Search

Depression is highly comorbid among individuals with Parkinson's Disease (PD), who often experience unique challenges to accessing and benefitting from empirically supported interventions like Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT). Given the role of reward processing in both depression and PD, this study analyzed a subset (N = 25) of participants who participated in a pilot telemedicine intervention of PD-informed CBT, and also completed a Reward- and Punishment-Learning Task (RPLT) at baseline. At the conclusion of CBT, participants were categorized into treatment responders (n = 14) and non-responders (n = 11). Responders learned more optimally from negative rather than positive feedback on the RPLT, while this pattern was reversed in non-responders. Computational modeling suggested group differences in learning rate to negative feedback may drive the observed differences. Overall, the results suggest that a within-subject bias for punishment-based learning might help to predict response to CBT intervention for depression in those with PD. Plain Language Summary Performance on a Computerized Task may predict which Parkinson's Disease Patients benefit from Cognitive Behavioral Treatment of Clinical Depression Why was the study done? Clinical depression regularly arises in individuals with Parkinson's Disease (PD) due to the neurobiological changes with the onset and progression of the disease as well as the unique psychosocial difficulties associated with living with a chronic condition. Nonetheless, psychiatric disorders among individuals with PD are often underdiagnosed and likewise undertreated for a variety of reasons. The results of our study have implications about how to improve the accuracy and specificity of mental health treatment recommendations in the future to maximize benefits for individuals with PD, who often face additional barriers to accessing quality mental health treatment. What did the researchers do? We explored whether performance on a computerized task called the Reward- and Punishment-Learning Task (RPLT) helped to predict response to Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) for depression better than other predictors identified in previous studies. Twenty-five individuals with PD and clinical depression that completed a 10-week telehealth CBT program were assessed for: Demographics (Age, gender, etc.); Clinical information (PD duration, mental health diagnoses, levels of anxiety/depression, etc.); Neurocognitive performance (Memory, processing speed, impulse control, etc.); and RPLT performance. What did the researchers find? A total of 14 participants significantly benefitted from CBT treatment while 11 did not significantly benefit from treatment. There were no differences before treatment in the demographics, clinical information, and neurocognitive performance of those participants who ended up benefitting from the treatment versus those who did not. There were, however, differences before treatment in RPLT performance so that those individuals that benefitted from CBT seemed to learn better from negative feedback. What do the findings mean? Our results suggest that the CBT program benefitted those PD patients with clinical depression that seemed to overall learn best from avoiding punishment rather than obtaining reward which was targeted in CBT by focusing on increasing engagement in rewarding activities. The Reward- and Punishment-Learning Task hence may be a useful tool to help predict treatment response and provide more individualized recommendations on how to best maximize the benefits of psychotherapy for individuals with PD that may struggle to connect to mental health care. Caution is recommended about interpretating these results beyond this study as the overall number of participants was small and the data for this study were collected as part of a previous study so there was no opportunity to include additional measurements of interest. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Dysregulation of habit formation has been recently proposed as pivotal to eating disorders. Here, we report that a subset of patients suffering from restrictive anorexia nervosa have enhanced habit formation compared with healthy controls. Habit formation is modulated by striatal cholinergic interneurons. These interneurons express vesicular transporters for acetylcholine (VAChT) and glutamate (VGLUT3) and use acetylcholine/glutamate cotransmission to regulate striatal functions. Using mice with genetically silenced VAChT (VAChT conditional KO, VAChTcKO) or VGLUT3 (VGLUT3cKO), we investigated the roles that acetylcholine and glutamate released by cholinergic interneurons play in habit formation and maladaptive eating. Silencing glutamate favored goal-directed behaviors and had no impact on eating behavior. In contrast, VAChTcKO mice were more prone to habits and maladaptive eating. Specific deletion of VAChT in the dorsomedial striatum of adult mice was sufficient to phenocopy maladaptive eating behaviors of VAChTcKO mice. Interestingly, VAChTcKO mice had reduced dopamine release in the dorsomedial striatum but not in the dorsolateral striatum. The dysfunctional eating behavior of VAChTcKO mice was alleviated by donepezil and by l-DOPA, confirming an acetylcholine/dopamine deficit. Our study reveals that loss of acetylcholine leads to a dopamine imbalance in striatal compartments, thereby promoting habits and vulnerability to maladaptive eating in mice., Introduction Eating disorders such as anorexia nervosa, bulimia nervosa, and binge eating disorder are severe psychiatric illnesses that are difficult to treat (1). Anorexia nervosa, in particular, has the highest [...]

Depression can occur due to common major life transitions, such as giving birth, menopause, retirement, empty-nest transition, and midlife crisis. Although some of these transitions are perceived as positive (e.g., giving birth), they may still lead to depression. We conducted a systematic literature review of the factors underlying the occurrence of depression following major life transition in some individuals. This review shows that major common life transitions can cause depression if they are sudden, major, and lead to loss (or change) of life roles (e.g., no longer doing motherly or fatherly chores after children leave family home). Accordingly, we provide a theoretical framework that explains depression caused by transitions in women. One of the most potential therapeutic methods of ameliorating depression associated with life transitions is either helping individuals accept their new roles (e.g., accepting new role as a mother to ameliorate postpartum depression symptoms) or providing them with novel life roles (e.g., volunteering after retirement or children leave family home) may help them overcome their illness. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In this review, we discuss the genetic etiologies of Alzheimer's disease (AD). Furthermore, we review genetic links to protein signaling pathways as novel pharmacological targets to treat AD. Moreover, we also discuss the clumps of AD-mediated genes according to their single nucleotide polymorphism mutations. Rigorous data mining approaches justified the significant role of genes in AD prevalence. Pedigree analysis and twin studies suggest that genetic components are part of the etiology, rather than only being risk factors for AD. The first autosomal dominant mutation in the amyloid precursor protein (APP) gene was described in 1991. Later, AD was also associated with mutated early-onset (presenilin 1/2, PSEN1/2 and APP) and late-onset (apolipoprotein E, ApoE) genes. Genome-wide association and linkage analysis studies with identified multiple genomic areas have implications for the treatment of AD. We conclude this review with future directions and clinical implications of genetic research in AD. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We recorded basolateral amygdala (BL) neurons in a seminaturalistic foraging task. Rats had to leave their nest to retrieve food in an elongated arena inhabited by a mechanical predator. There were marked trial-to-trial variations in behavior. After poking their head into the foraging arena and waiting there for a while, rats either retreated to their nest or initiated foraging. Before initiating foraging, rats waited longer on trials that followed failed than successful trials indicating that prior experience influenced behavior. Upon foraging initiation, most principal cells (Type-1) reduced their firing rate, while in a minority (Type-2) it increased. When rats aborted foraging, Type-1 cells increased their firing rates, whereas in Type-2 cells it did not change. Surprisingly, the opposite activity profiles of Type-1 and Type-2 units were also seen in control tasks devoid of explicit threats or rewards. The common correlate of BL activity across these tasks was movement velocity, although an influence of position was also observed. Thus depending on whether rats initiated movement or not, the activity of BL neurons decreased or increased, regardless of whether threat or rewards were present. Therefore, BL activity not only encodes threats or rewards, but is closely related to behavioral output. We propose that higher order cortical areas determine task-related changes in BL activity as a function of reward/threat expectations and internal states. Because Type-1 and Type-2 cells likely form differential connections with the central amygdala (controlling freezing), this process would determine whether movement aimed at attaining food or exploration is suppressed or facilitated. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background/aims: Levodopa and dopamine agonists have different effects on the motor, cognitive, and psychiatric aspects of Parkinson's disease (PD)., Methods: Using a computational model of basal ganglia (BG) and prefrontal cortex (PFC) dopamine, we provide a theoretical synthesis of the dissociable effects of these dopaminergic medications on brain and cognition. Our model incorporates the findings that levodopa is converted by dopamine cells into dopamine, and thus activates prefrontal and striatal D(1) and D(2) dopamine receptors, whereas antiparkinsonian dopamine agonists directly stimulate D(2) receptors in the BG and PFC (although some have weak affinity to D(1) receptors)., Results: In agreement with prior neuropsychological studies, our model explains how levodopa enhances, but dopamine agonists impair or have no effect on, stimulus-response learning and working memory., Conclusion: Our model explains how levodopa and dopamine agonists have differential effects on motor and cognitive processes in PD., (Copyright © 2012 S. Karger AG, Basel.)