Search

BackgroundObservational and experimental data support a potential breast cancer chemopreventive effect of green tea.MethodsWe conducted an ancillary study using archived blood/urine from a phase IB randomised, placebo-controlled dose escalation trial of an oral green tea extract, Polyphenon E (Poly E), in breast cancer patients. Using an adaptive trial design, women with stage I-III breast cancer who completed adjuvant treatment were randomised to Poly E 400 mg (n = 16), 600 mg (n = 11) and 800 mg (n = 3) twice daily or matching placebo (n = 10) for 6 months. Blood and urine collection occurred at baseline, and at 2, 4 and 6 months. Biological endpoints included growth factor [serum hepatocyte growth factor (HGF), vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)], lipid (serum cholesterol, triglycerides), oxidative damage and inflammatory biomarkers.ResultsFrom July 2007-August 2009, 40 women were enrolled and 34 (26 Poly E, eight placebo) were evaluable for biomarker endpoints. At 2 months, the Poly E group (all dose levels combined) compared to placebo had a significant decrease in mean serum HGF levels (-12.7% versus +6.3%, P = 0.04). This trend persisted at 4 and 6 months but was no longer statistically significant. For the Poly E group, serum VEGF decreased by 11.5% at 2 months (P = 0.02) and 13.9% at 4 months (P = 0.05) but did not differ compared to placebo. At 2 months, there was a trend toward a decrease in serum cholesterol with Poly E (P = 0.08). No significant differences were observed for other biomarkers.ConclusionsOur findings suggest potential mechanistic actions of tea polyphenols in growth factor signalling, angiogenesis and lipid metabolism.

Robust methods are needed to efficiently conduct large, multisite, randomized, controlled clinical trials of acupuncture protocols. The Southwest Oncology Group (SWOG) S1200 trial is a randomized, controlled (i.e., sham-controlled and waitlist-controlled) trial of a standardized acupuncture protocol for treating aromatase inhibitor (AI)-associated arthralgias in early-stage breast cancer patients (n=228). The primary objective of this study was to determine whether true acupuncture administered twice weekly for 6 weeks, as compared to sham acupuncture or a waitlist control, reduced AI-associated joint pain at 6 weeks as assessed by patient reports. The study was conducted at 11 institutions across the United States. The true acupuncture protocol was developed using a consensus-based process. The true acupuncture and the sham acupuncture protocols each consisted of 12 sessions administered for 6 weeks, followed by one weekly session for 6 weeks. The true acupuncture protocol used standardized protocol points, and the standardized acupoints were tailored to a patient's joint symptoms. The similarly standardized sham acupuncture protocol utilized superficial needling of nonacupoints. Standardized methods were developed to train and monitor acupuncturists and included online and in-person training, study manuals, monthly phone calls, and remote quality assurance monitoring throughout the study period. The research staff similarly received online and in-person training and monthly phone calls.

Abstract Background: Despite the well-proven efficacy of aromatase inhibitors(AIs) for the treatment of hormone-sensitive breast cancer, a significant number of women suffer from musculoskeletal side-effects which can result in early discontinuation of this important medication. Given the proposed anti-inflammatory effects of omega-3-fatty acid and the paucity of therapeutic options for AI-induced arthralgia, it is therefore reasonable to test the efficacy of omega-3-fatty acid in women with breast cancer who have developed moderate to severe joint symptoms after initiating AIs. Specific aims: To assess if omega-3-fatty acid as compared to placebo causes a reduction in worst joint pain/stiffness in women with AI-associated arthralgias at 12weeks as measured by the modified Brief Pain Inventory (BPI). Additional measures will include the WOMAC, M-SACRAH, FACT-ES and global rating of change, which will be assessed at baseline, 6, 12 and 24 weeks. We will evaluate fasting lipids, hormone levels, serum inflammatory markers (TNF, IL2, CRP), and markers of joint destruction (CTX-II) at baseline, 12 and 24 weeks. Eligibility criteria:Pts. must have histologically-confirmed stages I-III breast cancer, with no evidence of metastatic disease and undergone definitive breast cancer surgery. Pts must be post-menopausal and currently be taking a third-generation AI —anastrazole(Arimidex®), letrozole (Femara®), or exemestane (Aromasin®) for at least the previous 90 days prior to registration with plans to continue for at least an additional 180 days after registration.The patient must have a worse joint pain/stiffness score of 5 or greater on the 10-point scale of the BPI which started or increased after initiation of AI. Pts must not have taken omega-3-fatty acid supplements within the past 3 months prior to registration.Pts will be randomized to receive 6 capsules daily (at 1,000 mg each; ∼600mg combination of ethyl esters EPA/DHA) of omega-3-fattyacid or matching placebo daily for 24 weeks. Statistical methods:We stipulate an alpha=.05 two-sided test, with an estimated 5% non-adherenceand 20% dropout rate at the primary endpoint evaluation time of 12 weeks after randomization. For a two point difference in worst joint pain/stiffness and a 3.5 point SD at 12 weeks, 222 eligible patients would be required for 90% power under a two-arm normal design. To allow ineligibility rate of 10%, 246 total pts will be enrolled. The study should be activated September 2011. Funding: Supported by National Cancer Institute grant CA037429 Citation Information: Cancer Res 2011;71(24 Suppl):Abstract nr OT2-07-02.

Objective: While there are a number of benefits to minimally invasive surgery (MIS) for women with ovarian cysts, there is an increased risk of ovarian capsule rupture during the procedure, which could potentially seed the abdominal cavity with malignant cells. We developed a decision model to compare the risks, benefits, effectiveness and cost of MIS versus laparotomy in women with ovarian masses. Design: Cost‐effectiveness study Population: Hypothetical cohort of 10 000 women with ovarian masses who were undergoing surgical management. Methods: The initial decision point in the model was performance of surgery via laparotomy or a MIS approach. Model probabilities, costs and utility values were derived from published literature and administrative data sources. Extensive sensitivity analyses were conducted to assess the robustness of the findings. Main outcome measures: The primary outcome was the cost‐effectiveness of MIS versus laparotomy for women with a pelvic mass measured by incremental cost‐effectiveness ratios (ICERs). Results: MIS was the least costly strategy at $7,732 per women on average, compared with $17,899 for laparotomy. In our hypothetical cohort of 10 000 women, there were 64 cases of ovarian rupture in the MIS group and 53 in the laparotomy group, while there were 26 cancer‐related deaths in the MIS group and 25 in the laparotomy group. MIS was more effective than laparotomy (188 462 QALYs for MIS versus 187 631 quality adjusted life years [QALYs] for laparotomy). Thus, MIS was a dominant strategy, being both less costly and more effective than laparotomy. These results were robust in a variety of sensitivity analyses. Conclusion: MIS constitutes a cost‐effective management strategy for women with suspicious ovarian masses. MIS is a cost‐effective management strategy for women with suspicious ovarian masses. MIS is a cost‐effective management strategy for women with suspicious ovarian masses. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: Frailty is the loss of physical or mental reserve that impairs function, often in the absence of a defined comorbidity. Our aim was to determine whether a modified frailty index (mFI) correlates with morbidity and mortality in patients undergoing hysterectomy.Design: Retrospective cohort study.Setting: Hospitals across the USA participating in the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP).Sample: Patients who underwent hysterectomy from 2008 to 2012.Methods: An mFI was calculated using 11 variables in NSQIP. The associations between mFI and morbidity and mortality were assessed. Model fit statistics (c-statistics) were utilised to evaluate the ability of mFI to distinguish outcomes.Main Outcome Measure: Wound infection, severe complications and mortality.Results: A total of 66 105 patients were identified. Wound complications increased from 2.4% in patients with an mFI of zero to 4.8% in those with mFI ≥ 0.5 (P < 0.0001). Similarly, severe complications increased from 0.98% to 7.3% (P < 0.0001), overall complications rose from 3.7% to 14.5% (P < 0.0001) and mortality increased from 0.06% to 3.2% (P < 0.0001) for patients with a frailty index of zero compared with those with an index of ≥ 0.5. Versus chance, the goodness-of-fit c-statistics suggested that mFI increases the ability to detect wound complications by 11.4%, severe complications by 22.0% and overall complications by 11.0%.Conclusions: The mFI is easily reproducible from routinely collected clinical data and predictive of outcomes in patients undergoing hysterectomy. Frailty may be useful in the preoperative risk assessment of women undergoing gynaecological surgery.Tweetable Abstract: Frailty may be useful in the preoperative risk assessment of women undergoing gynaecological surgery. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]