Search

OBJECTIVE: To identify the frequency and factors associated with therapy noncompliance in type-2 diabetes mellitus patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A cross-sectional study was carried out in 79 patients with type-2 diabetes mellitus seen in major hospitals of Mexico City. Patients were visited at home, from March 1998 to August 1999, to measure compliance with prescribed therapy. Complying patients were defined as those taking at least 80% of their pills or 80% of their corresponding insulin dose. The degree of compliance with therapy components (diet, amount of exercise, and keeping appointments) was measured. RESULTS: The average age of study subjects was 59 years (SD 11 years); 73% (n=58) were female subjects. The overall frequency of noncompliance was 39%. Noncompliance rates were: 62% for dietary recommendations, 85% for exercise, 17% for intake of oral hypoglycemic medication, 13% for insulin application, and 3% for appointment keeping. Hypertension plus obesity was the only factor significantly associated with noncompliance (OR 4.58, CI 95% 1.0, 22.4, p=0.02). CONCLUSIONS: The frequency of therapy noncompliance was very high, especially for diet and exercise.

OBJETIVO: Determinar el impacto nutricio del consumo de leche entera fortificada con vitaminas y minerales en niños. MATERIAL Y MÉTODOS: Se hizo un estudio prospectivo, longitudinal, en 227 niños de entre 8 a 60 meses de edad. Se ofreció a los menores 500 ml diarios de leche entera fortificada por 90 días. Se registró ingestión, aceptación, peso, talla, hemoglobina (Hb), hierro (Fe), vitamina B12 y folatos séricos. El análisis estadístico se realizó con medidas de tendencia central y dispersión en variables dimensionales utilizando prueba t de Student para comparación de promedios y ji² para variables nominales. RESULTADOS: Al inicio de la suplementación 45 niños estaban desnutridos, y 36, anémicos. Al final de la misma estas cifras disminuyeron: 35 desnutridos (p< 0.21) y 18 niños anémicos (p< 0.01). Al inicio nueve niños tenían desnutrición severa y, al finalizar, sólo eran cinco los que la padecían. La comparación ingreso-egreso en los datos antropométricos fue como sigue (media±desviación estándar): Z peso/talla, -0.35±0.88 vs. -0.14±0.9 (p= 0.01); Hb en g/dl, 11±1.3 vs. 11.9±1.9 (p< 0.001); Fe en mg/dl, 108±44 vs. 115±31 (p= 0.06); vitamina B12 en pg/ml, 649±494 vs. 1 053±854 (p< 0.001). El apego y la aceptación fueron de 100 y 85%, respectivamente. CONCLUSIONES: El consumo de leche entera fortificada durante 90 días mejora significativamente el estado nutricio de los niños, reduce significativamente el número de niños con anemia e incrementa los niveles plasmáticos de Hb, Vitamina B12 y folatos.

Abstract Background The myasthenia gravis is twice as common in women as in men and frequently affects young women in the second and third decades of life, overlapping with the childbearing years. Generally, during pregnancy in one third of patients the disease exacerbates, whereas in two thirds it remains clinically unchanged. Complete remission can occur in some patients. Methods To describe the clinical course, delivery and neonatal outcome of 18 pregnant women with the diagnosis of myasthenia gravis. Retrospective chart review of pregnant patients with myasthenia gravis, followed at the National Institute of Perinatology in Mexico City over an 8-year period. Data was abstracted from the medical records on the clinical course during pregnancy, delivery and neonatal outcome. Results From January 1, 1996 to December 31, 2003 18 patients with myasthenia gravis were identified and included in the study. The mean ± SD maternal age was 27.4 ± 4.0 years. During pregnancy 2 women (11%) had an improvement in the clinical symptoms of myasthenia gravis, 7 women (39%) had clinical worsening of the condition of 9 other patients (50%) remained clinically unchanged. Nine patients delivered vaginally, 8 delivered by cesarean section and 1 pregnancy ended in fetal loss. Seventeen infants were born at mean ± SD gestational age of 37.5 ± 3.0 weeks and a mean birth weight of 2710 ± 73 g. Only one infant presented with transient neonatal myasthenia gravis. No congenital anomalies were identified in any of the newborns. Conclusions The clinical course of myasthenia gravis during pregnancy is variable, with a significant proportion of patients experiencing worsening of the clinical symptoms. However, neonatal transient myasthenia was uncommon in our patient population.

Background and Objective: To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of the ambulatory EEG (aEEG) at detecting interictal epileptiform discharges (IEDs)/seizures compared with routine EEG (rEEG) and repetitive/second rEEG in patients with a first single unprovoked seizure (FSUS). We also evaluated the association between IED/seizures on aEEG and seizure recurrence within 1 year of follow-up., Methods: We prospectively evaluated 100 consecutive patients with FSUS at the provincial Single Seizure Clinic. They underwent 3 sequential EEG modalities: first rEEG, second rEEG, and aEEG. Clinical epilepsy diagnosis was ascertained based on the 2014 International League Against Epilepsy definition by a neurologist/epileptologist at the clinic. An EEG-certified epileptologist/neurologist interpreted all 3 EEGs. All patients were followed up for 52 weeks until they had either second unprovoked seizure or maintained single seizure status. Accuracy measures (sensitivity, specificity, negative and positive predictive values, and likelihood ratios), receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, and area under the curve (AUC) were used to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of each EEG modality. Life tables and the Cox proportional hazard model were used to estimate the probability and association of seizure recurrence., Results: Ambulatory EEG captured IED/seizures with a sensitivity of 72%, compared with 11% for the first rEEG and 22% for the second rEEG. The diagnostic performance of the aEEG was statistically better (AUC: 0.85) compared with the first rEEG (AUC: 0.56) and second rEEG (AUC: 0.60). There were no statistically significant differences between the 3 EEG modalities regarding specificity and positive predictive value. Finally, IED/seizure on the aEEG was associated with more than 3 times the hazard of seizure recurrence., Discussion: The overall diagnostic accuracy of aEEG at capturing IED/seizures in people presenting with FSUS was higher than the first and second rEEGs. We also found that IED/seizures on the aEEG were associated with an increased risk of seizure recurrence., Classification of Evidence: This study provides Class I evidence supporting that, in adults with First Single Unprovoked Seizure (FSUS), 24-h ambulatory EEG has increased sensitivity when compared with routine and repeated EEG., Competing Interests: J.F. Tellez Zenteno is deceased; disclosures are not included for this author. N. Jette receives grant funding from her institution for grants unrelated to this work from NINDS (NIH U24NS107201, NIH IU54NS100064, 3R01CA202911-05S1, R21NS122389, R01HL161847). Also, she receives an honorarium for her work as an Associate Editor of Epilepsia. Other authors declare that they have no relevant or material financial interests that relate to the research described in this paper. Full disclosure form information provided by the authors is available with the full text of this article at Neurology.org/cp., (© 2023 American Academy of Neurology.)

Background: Less than one-third of people with epilepsy will develop drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE). Establishing the prognosis of each unique epilepsy case is an important part of evaluation and treatment.Most studies on DRE prognosis have been based on a pooled, heterogeneous group, including children, adults, and older adults, in the absence of clear recognition and control of important confounders, such as age group. Furthermore, previous studies were done before the 2010 definition of DRE by the International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE), so data based on the current definitions have not been entirely elucidated. This study aimed to explore the difference between 3 definitions of DRE and clinical predictors of DRE in adults and older adults. Methods: Patients with a new diagnosis of epilepsy ascertained at a Single Seizure Clinic (SSC) in Saskatchewan, Canada were included if they had at least 1 year of follow-up. The first study outcome was the diagnosis of DRE epilepsy at follow-up using the 2010 ILAE definition. This was compared with 2 alternative definitions of DRE by Kwan and Brodie and Camfield and Camfield. Finally, risk factors were analyzed using the ILAE definition. Results: In total, 95 patients with a new diagnosis of epilepsy and a median follow-up of 24 months were included. The median age of patients at the diagnosis of epilepsy was 33 years, and 51% were men. In the cohort, 32% of patients were diagnosed with DRE by the Kwan and Brodie definition, 10% by Camfield and Camfield definition, and 15% by the ILAE definition by the end of follow-up. The only statistically significant risk factor for DRE development was the failure to respond to the first anti-seizure medication (ASM). Conclusion: There were important differences in the percentage of patients diagnosed with DRE when using 3 concurrent definitions. However, the use of the ILAE definition appeared to be the most consistent through an extended follow-up. Finally, failure to respond to the first ASM was the sole significant risk factor for DRE in the cohort after considering the age group., Competing Interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2021 Denton, Thorpe, Carter, Angarita-Fonseca, Waterhouse and Hernandez Ronquillo.)

Epilepsy comprises more than 40 clinical syndromes affecting millions of patients and families worldwide. To decode the molecular and pathological framework of epilepsy researchers, need reliable human epilepsy and control brain samples. Brain bank organizations collecting and supplying well-documented clinically and pathophysiologically tissue specimens are important for high-quality neurophysiology and neuropharmacology studies for epilepsy and other neurological diseases. New development in molecular mechanism and new treatment methods for neurological disorders have evoked increased demands for human brain tissue. An epilepsy brain bank is a storage source for both the frozen samples as well as the formaldehyde fixed paraffin embedded (FFPE) tissue from epilepsy surgery resections. In 2014, the University of Saskatchewan have started collecting human epilepsy brain tissues for the first time in Canada. This review highlights the necessity and importance of Epilepsy Brain bank that provides unique access for research to valuable source of brain tissue and blood samples from epilepsy patients., (Copyright © 2020 Hernandez-Ronquillo, Miranzadeh Mahabadi, Moien-Afshari, Wu, Auer, Zherebitskiy, Borowsky, Mickleborough, Huntsman, Vrbancic, Cayabyab, Taghibiglou, Carter and Tellez-Zenteno.)

Purpose: The aim of this study was to determine and compare the waiting times for surgical assessment, neuropsychological testing and epilepsy surgery between people with epilepsy who live in cities with available neurologists vs not., Methods: We reviewed all cases referred for epilepsy surgery between 2007 and 2017 at the Saskatchewan Epilepsy Program Royal University Hospital (SEP) (n = 98; Saskatchewan, Canada). Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare wait times from first diagnosis of epilepsy to epilepsy surgery between patients who live in cities with neurologists (mainly urban areas) vs cities without neurologists (mainly rural areas)., Results: The mean age of patients who enrolled in SEP was 37.8 ± 12.8 years. The median wait time from date of epilepsy diagnosis to referral was 9.5 years in Saskatoon and Regina (cities with available neurologists) and 14 years in other areas of Saskatchewan (small cities and rural areas with no available neurologists) (p = 0.03). The median wait time from date of epilepsy diagnosis to first consult with the epileptologist was 10 years in Saskatoon and Regina and 15.5 years in other areas of Saskatchewan (p = 0.03). The median wait time from date of first diagnosis to epilepsy surgery was 13.2 years in Saskatoon and Regina and 18.2 years in other areas of Saskatchewan (p = 0.05)., Conclusion: A notable difference was observed in surgical wait times between patients who live in cities with available neurologists compared with people living in rural areas and cities with no neurologists. This suggests that delayed surgical treatment for epilepsy is related with the availability of neurologists., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors., (Copyright © 2020 British Epilepsy Association. All rights reserved.)

In recent years clinical and epidemiological research on cysticercosis has gained significant interest in some countries, especially in Latin American countries and some countries in Asia and Africa. For many years it has been proposed that the higher prevalence of epilepsy seen in some regions such as Latin-America could be explained by parasitic infections, particularly neurocysticercosis (NCC). In this review we discussed selected epidemiological topics of the association of NCC and epilepsy, such as global distribution around the world, identification of NCC in developed countries, drug resistant epilepsy and NCC. Finally this review presents a critical review of biases of the published literature in NCC. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled "Neurocysticercosis and Epilepsy"., (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Surface electroencephalogram (EEG) recording remains the gold standard for noninvasive assessment of electrical brain activity. It is the most efficient way to diagnose and classify epilepsy syndromes as well as define the localization of the epileptogenic zone. The EEG is useful for management decisions and for establishing prognosis in some types of epilepsy. Electroencephalography is an evolving field in which new methods are being introduced. The Canadian Society of Clinical Neurophysiologists convened an expert panel to develop new national minimal guidelines. A comprehensive evidence review was conducted. This document is organized into 10 sections, including indications, recommendations for trained personnel, EEG yield, paediatric and neonatal EEGs, laboratory minimal standards, requisitions, reports, storage, safety measures, and quality assurance.

Background: Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) therapy has been widely recognized as an alternative for the treatment of drug-resistant epilepsy, although modification of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) during VNS treatment could explain the improvement in patients., Methods: We retrospectively assessed the efficacy of VNS in 30 adult patients with epilepsy treated with >6 months of follow-up. The criteria for implantation were the following: (1) not a candidate for resective epilepsy surgery, (2) drug-resistant epilepsy, (3) impairment of quality of life, (4) no other option of treatment, and (5) patients with idiopathic generalized epilepsy who fail to be controlled with appropriate AEDs. We assessed sociodemographics, seizure etiology, seizure classification, and AEDs used during treatment with VNS. We assessed adverse effects and efficacy. Responder rate was defined as >50% seizure improvement from baseline., Results: Thirty patients (females, 18; males, 12; age, 35.1±13.3 years) were included. After 6, 12, 24, and 36 months of follow-up, the response rates were: 13/30 (43%), 13/27 (48%), 9/22 (41%), and 8/16 (50%), respectively; none was seizure free. Fifty-seven percent, 33%, 59%, and 81% of patients had changes of medication type or dose at 6, 12, 24, and 36 months respectively. In the majority of patients, the change of medication consisted of an increase in the dose of AEDs., Conclusions: Our study shows that VNS is an effective therapy, although significant changes in medications were done along with the therapy; therefore, the real effect of VNS could be controversial.

A single unprovoked seizure is a frequent phenomenon in the general population and the rate of seizure recurrence can vary widely. Individual risk prognostication is crucial in predicting patient outcomes and guiding treatment decisions. In this article, we review the most important risk factors associated with an increased likelihood of seizure recurrence after a single unprovoked seizure. In summary, the presence of focal seizure, nocturnal seizure, history of prior brain injury, family history of epilepsy, abnormal neurological exam, epileptiform discharges on electroencephalography and neuroimaging abnormalities, portend increased risk of seizure recurrence. Elucidation of these risk factors in patient assessment will augment clinical decision-making and may help determine the appropriateness of instituting anti-epilepsy treatment. We also discuss the Canadian model of single seizure clinics and the potential use to assess these patients., (Copyright © 2017. Published by Elsevier Ltd.)

Epileptic seizures are one of the main reasons for neurological visits in an emergency department. Convulsions represent a traumatic event for the patient and the family, with significant medical and social consequences. Due to their prevalence and impact, the initial management is of vital importance. Although following the first epileptic seizure, early recurrence diminishes after establishing treatment with antiepileptic drugs, the forecast for developing epilepsy and long-term outcomes are not altered by any early intervention. Detailed questioning based on the symptoms of the convulsions, the patient's medical history and a full electroencephalogram and neuroimaging study make it possible to define the risk of recurrence of the seizure and the possible diagnosis of epilepsy. Epileptic abnormalities, the presence of old or new potentially epileptogenic brain lesions, as well as nocturnal seizures, increase the risk of recurrence. Physicians must assess each patient on an individual basis to determine the most suitable treatment, and explain the risk of not being treated versus the risk that exists if treatment with antiepileptic drugs is established.

Introduction: The effect of the single seizure clinic (SSC) model on patient diagnose, work-up, wait-times, and clinical care is poorly characterized and its efficacy unclear. The present study assesses patient characteristics and evaluates the impact of a single seizure clinic (SSC) model on wait-times and access to care., Material and Methods: A prospective study of all patients (n=200) referred to our SSC for first seizure evaluation. Demographic, clinical, and paraclinicial variables were systematically collected and analyzed against a historical cohort. Binary logistic regression analysis was performed to predict impact of dichotomized variables on diagnosis of epilepsy. Diagnostic concordance between SSC nurses and epileptologists was also assessed., Results: Predominant referral sources were emergency department physicians and general practitioners. Mean wait-time for first assessment was significantly reduced by 70.5% employing the SSC model versus historical usual care. A diagnosis was established at first-contact in 80.5% of cases while 16.0% of patients required a second visit. Eighty-two patients (41.0%) were diagnosed with epilepsy. An abnormal EEG was found in 93.9% of patients diagnosed with epilepsy. Sixty-three patients were started on anti-epileptic drugs (63.5% lamotrigine, 7.0% levetiracetam, 5.0% phenytoin, and 5.0% topiramate). In 18% of cases driving restrictions were initiated by the SSC. The most common non-seizure diagnosis was syncope (24.0%)., Discussion: The SSC reduced wait-times for assessment and investigations, clarified diagnoses, affected management decisions with respect to further workup, pharmacotherapy, and driving. There was moderate correlation between SSC nurses and physicians (kappa=0.54; p<0.001) as physicians were significantly more likely to diagnose epilepsy. Key factors identified as predictors of epilepsy were: presence of abnormalities on electroencephalography and imaging studies, patients stratified as high or medium-risk for seizure recurrence, semiological characteristics such as amnesia and limb stiffening, and presence of tongue trauma, or incontinence., Conclusions: The SSC model reduces wait-times, streamlines assessments, and impacts clinical care decisions., (Copyright © 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Objective: No standard, widely accepted criteria exist to determine who should be referred for an epilepsy surgical evaluation. As a result, indications for epilepsy surgery evaluation vary significantly between centers. We review the literature to assess what criteria have been used to select patients for resective epilepsy surgery and examine whether these have changed since the publication of the first epilepsy surgery randomized controlled trial in 2001., Methods: A systematic review was conducted using PubMed and EMBASE, bibliographies of reviews and book chapters identifying focal epilepsy resective series. Abstract, full text review and data abstraction (i.e. indications for surgery) were performed independently by two reviewers. Descriptive historical analysis was done to examine indications over time., Results: Out of 5061 articles related to epilepsy surgery, 384 articles met all eligibility criteria. Most common criteria for selecting patients for evaluation for resective surgery were: AED resistance (n=303, most commonly >2 AEDs=46), epilepsy duration (n=53, most commonly >1 year=42) and seizure frequency (most commonly at least one seizure/month, n=29). Out of the prospective studies the most notable change over time (pre-2000 vs. post-2000) was failure of ≥2 AEDs (8% vs. 43% respectively, p<0.001)., Conclusions: Important variations between studies make it difficult to identify consistent criteria to guide surgical candidacy or changes in indications over time. With increasing evidence that earlier surgery is associated with better outcomes, it is recommended that patients be evaluated as soon as they have failed two AEDs, consistent with the new definition of drug resistant epilepsy. Furthermore, low seizure frequency should not be a barrier to epilepsy surgery. Anyone with drug resistant epilepsy should be promptly evaluated for possible surgery, regardless of seizure frequency., (Copyright © 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: The purpose of this study was to determine the diagnostic value of the palmomental reflex in order to identify frontal lesions in neurological outpatients., Methods: Two hundred twenty-six neurological patients with suspected intracranial lesion with an indication for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were included. All patients underwent the same MRI protocol. The reflex was elicited by trained and standardized nurses, and was evaluated by two neurologists. The evaluation was blind and independent. The test's accuracy was calculated. The Kappa coefficient was used to calculate the interobserver and intra-observer reliability., Results: The interobserver reliability between neurologists was 0.53 with 93% of agreement (p<0.001). The diagnostic accuracy measures were as follow: sensitivity of 19%, specificity of 93%, positive predictive value of 30%, negative predictive value of 88%, positive likelihood ratio of 2.7 and negative likelihood ratio of 0.87. The area under the curve was 0.56., Conclusion: The palmomental reflex is associated with frontal structural lesions but the sensitivity is low, indicating a high percentage of frontal lesions with a negative reflex. When the test is used on its own, it is insufficient to detect frontal damage., (Copyright © 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Video electroencephalographic monitoring (VEM) is used to record ictal and interictal epileptiform activity and to ascertain the level of concordance between the two. Often, taper or discontinuation of anti-epileptic (AED) therapy is needed to facilitate seizure occurrence. The safety of this practice is unclear and long-term sequelae have yet to be elucidated., Methods: This is a prospective study of 158 patients subjected to combined sleep-deprived VEM with rapid AED withdrawal, for evaluation of seizure-like episodes over 24 months under the care of an epileptologist with direct nursing observation and EEG technician support in our telemetry unit. In most cases, AEDs were discontinued within 24h of admission. We assessed the diagnostic yield and safety of VEM as well as epilepsy surgery outcomes., Results: VEM answered the study question in 90.5% of cases but failed to record ictal events in 9.5%. This diagnostic yield was achieved over a mean VEM duration of 4.53±1.44 days, with no benefit of longer monitoring. These findings improved quality of life by optimizing medical and surgical therapeutic planning, leading to improved seizure control. Overall, 32.9% of the cohort received epilepsy surgery. The complication rate was 5.06%, characterized largely by musculoskeletal pain secondary to clinical seizure activity, with no mortality observed. In the first month following VEM 2.5% of patients received emergency-room admission for seizure clustering., Conclusions: VEM with combined sleep deprivation and protocolized rapid AED withdrawal is a safe and effective investigative technique with no adverse long-term sequelae. It is a reliable strategy for therapeutic planning and can be used to determine candidacy for surgical treatment., (Copyright © 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Underutilization of epilepsy surgery remains a major problem and is in part due to physicians' misconceptions about the risks associated with epilepsy surgery. The purpose of this study was to systematically review the literature on complications of focal epilepsy surgery., Methods: A literature search was conducted using PubMed and Embase to identify studies examining epilepsy surgery complications. Abstract and full text review, along with data extraction, was done in duplicate. Minor medical and neurologic complications were defined as those that resolved completely within 3 months of surgery, whereas major complications persisted beyond that time frame. Descriptive statistics were used to report complication proportions., Key Findings: Invasive monitoring: Minor complications were reported in 7.7% of patients, whereas major complications were reported in only 0.6% of patients undergoing invasive monitoring. Resective surgery: Minor and major medical complications were reported in 5.1% and 1.5% of patients respectively, most common being cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak. Minor neurologic complications occurred in 10.9% of patients and were twice as frequent in children (11.2% vs. 5.5%). Minor visual field defects were most common (12.9%). Major neurologic complications were noted in 4.7% of patients, with the most common being major visual field defects (2.1% overall). Perioperative mortality was uncommon after epilepsy surgery, occurring in only 0.4% of temporal lobe patients (1.2%extratemporal)., Significance: The majority of complications after epilepsy surgery are minor or temporary as they tend to resolve completely. Major permanent neurologic complications remain uncommon. Mortality as a result of epilepsy surgery in the modern era is rare., (Wiley Periodicals, Inc. © 2013 International League Against Epilepsy.)

Surgery is a highly effective treatment for some specific types of refractory epilepsy and once seizure freedom is achieved many patients and clinicians have to ponder whether to taper or discontinue antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). However, there is no standard practice or guidelines and practices vary widely. The few studies that have addressed this question are retrospective and lack randomised, controlled comparisons, making it difficult to draw any solid inferences. This review examines this topic by analysing key data based on the following: controlled studies which compare outcomes in patients with either withdrawn or unmodified AEDs after epilepsy surgery, non-controlled studies, information from meta-analyses and systematic reviews, surveys of clinical practice, and other relevant reviews. Between 12 and 32% of patients had seizure relapse following tapering or discontinuation of AEDs, which was not significantly different from 7 to 45% in patients without AED modification. In the event of seizure relapse upon tapering of AEDs, 45-92.3% restarted AED treatment and regained seizure freedom. The most consistent risk factors for seizure relapse were: age older than 30 years at the time of surgery, persistent auras, early drug tapering, seizure recurrence before a reduction of drugs, normal MRI, a longer period with epilepsy, absence of hippocampal sclerosis, and the presence of interictal discharges on EEG after surgery.

Objectives: Despite evidence that epilepsy surgery is more effective than medical therapy, significant delays between seizure intractability and surgery exist. We aimed to develop a new Web-based methodology to assist physicians in identifying patients who might benefit from an epilepsy surgery evaluation., Methods: The RAND/UCLA appropriateness method was used. Clinical scenarios were developed based on eligibility criteria from previously published surgical series. Thirteen national experts rated the scenarios for their appropriateness for an epilepsy surgery evaluation based on published evidence. All scenarios were rerated after a face-to-face meeting following a modified Delphi process. Appropriate scenarios were rerated for necessity to determine referral priority., Results: Of the final 2646 scenarios, 20.6% (n = 544) were appropriate, 17.2% (n = 456) uncertain, and 61.5% (n = 1626) inappropriate for a surgical evaluation. Of the appropriate cases, 55.9% (n = 306) were rated as very high priority. Not attempting AED treatment was always rated as inappropriate for a referral. Trial of 2 AEDs was usually rated as appropriate unless seizure-free or not fully investigated Based on these data, a Web-based decision tool (www.epilepsycases.com) was created., Conclusions: Using the available evidence through 2008 and expert consensus, we developed a Web-based decision tool that provides a guide for determining candidacy for epilepsy surgery evaluations. The tool needs clinical validation, and will be updated and revised regularly. This rendition of the tool is most appropriate for those over age 12 years with focal epilepsy. The Rand/UCLA appropriate methodology might be considered in the development of guidelines in other areas of epilepsy care.

Introduction: Ambulatory electroencephalography (AEEG) is a monitoring technique that allows the recording of continuous EEG activity when patients are at home, without the necessity of admission to the hospital for prolonged video-EEG monitoring., Methods: This is a prospective cohort study performed in a Canadian academic centre in order to assess the yield and tolerability of AEEG in the adult population. Over a period of three years, 101 patients were included. The yield of AEEG was assessed by taking into account the questions asked by the clinician before and after the investigation., Results: One hundred and one patients undergoing AEEG were prospectively recruited during a three-year-period. Our population consisted of 45 males (44.6%) and 56 females (55.4%). The mean age of the group was 36.6 ± 16.1 years. Most of the patients had at least one previous routine EEG (93%). The primary reasons for the AEEGs were subdivided into four categories: a) to differentiate between seizures and non-epileptic events; b) to determine the frequency of seizures and epileptiform discharges; c) to characterize seizure type or localization; and d) to potentially diagnose epilepsy. The mean duration of AEEG recording was 32 ± 17 hours (15-96 hours). For 73 (72%) patients, the AEEG provided information that was useful for the management. For 28 (28%) patients, the AEEG did not provide information on diagnosis because no events or epileptiform activity occurred. In only 1 patient was the AEEG inconclusive due to non-physiological artefacts. Three patients were referred for epilepsy surgery without the necessity of video-EEG telemetry., Conclusion: In this study, we found that AEEG has a high diagnostic yield (72%) and believe that careful selection of patients is the most important factor for a high diagnostic yield. The main use of AEEG is the characterization of patients with non-epileptic events, in patients with a diagnosis of epilepsy that is not clear, and quantification of spikes and seizures to improve the medical management. Ambulatory EEG is a cost-effective solution for increasing demands for in-hospital video-EEG monitoring of adult patients.

Fatigue can be defined as extreme and persistent tiredness, weakness or exhaustion that could be mental, physical or both. The main objective of this study is to validate three instruments to measure fatigue (Fatigue Symptom Inventory--FSI, Fatigue Assessment Instrument--FAI, Fatigue Severity Scale--FSS) in patients with epilepsy (PWE). We used concurrent validity as a method of validation. Reliability of the fatigue scales was assessed in PWE. We applied the three selected questionnaires plus the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) in PWE, healthy volunteers (HV) and patients with other neurological conditions. We studied 67 PWE, 34 HV and 56 patients with different neurological conditions. The mean fatigue scores in each group were as follows: (a) for the FSS, the score in HV was 2.6±1.1, in PWE 4.2±1.5, in Patients with multiple Sclerosis (PMS) 4.8±1.4, in Patients with Migraine (PWM) 4.4±1.9, in Patients with radiculopathy (PR) 4.5±0.9. (b) For the FSI, the score in HV was 2.2±1.3, in PWE 3.9±2.3, in PMS 4.1±1.9, in PWM 4.5±2.5, and in PR 5.4±1.4. (c) For the FAI in HV was 3.0±1.1, in PWE 4.2±1.3, in PMS 4.5±0.9, PWM 4.3±1.5, and in PR 4.4±1.4. The correlation between the BDI and the FSS was 0.52 (p<0.001), between the BDI and the FSI was 0.62 (p<0.001), and between the BDI and the FAI was 0.54 (p<0.001). Patients with epilepsy have consistently higher fatigue scores compared healthy controls, and scores that are comparable with other neurological conditions. The FSI, FAI and FSS display concurrent validity and high intra-observer reliability in PWE, indicating that these scales could be utilized for further study of fatigue in epilepsy., (Copyright © 2011. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

Purpose: Epilepsy surgery is a safe surgical procedure, but it may be associated with cognitive changes. Estimates of the risk of decline in specific neuropsychological domains after epilepsy surgery would assist surgical decision making in clinical practice. The goal of this study was to conduct a systematic review to derive pooled estimates of the rate of losses and gains in neuropsychological functions after epilepsy surgery, using empirically based methods for quantifying cognitive change., Methods: An extensive literature search using PubMed, EmBase, and the Cochrane database was conducted, yielding 5,061 articles on epilepsy surgery, with 193 on neuropsychological outcomes (IQ, memory, language, executive functioning, attention, and subjective cognitive changes)., Key Findings: Of these, 23 met final eligibility criteria, with 22 studies involving temporal surgery only. Key aspects of inclusion criteria were N ≥ 20 and use of reliable change index or standardized regression-based change estimates. In addition to the proportion of patients experiencing losses and gains in each individual test, a single pooled estimate of gains and losses for each cognitive domain was derived using a random effects model. Weighted estimates indicated a risk to verbal memory with left-sided temporal surgery of 44%, twice as high as the rate for right-sided surgery (20%). Naming was reduced in 34% of left-sided temporal patients, with almost no patients with gains (4%). Pooled data on IQ, executive functioning, and attention indicated few patients show declines post surgery, but a substantial rate of improvement in verbal fluency with left-sided temporal surgery (27%) was found. Self-reported cognitive declines after epilepsy surgery were uncommon, and gains were reported in some domains where losses were found on objective tests (i.e., verbal memory and language). Variations in surgical techniques did not appear to have a large effect on cognitive outcomes, except for naming outcomes, which appeared better with more conservative resections. Sensitivity to postoperative changes differed across visual memory tests, but not verbal memory tests. Few conclusions could be made regarding cognitive risks and benefits of extratemporal epilepsy surgery, or of epilepsy surgery in children., Significance: In sum, epilepsy surgery is associated with specific cognitive changes, but may also improve cognition in some patients. The results provide base rate estimates of expected cognitive gains and losses associated with epilepsy surgery that may prove useful in clinical settings., (Wiley Periodicals, Inc. © 2011 International League Against Epilepsy.)

Purpose: The objective of this systematic review was to identify: (1) prevalence and severity of psychiatric conditions before and after resective epilepsy surgery, (2) incidence of postsurgical psychiatric conditions, and (3) predictors of psychiatric status after surgery., Methods: A literature search was conducted using PubMed, EmBase, and the Cochrane database as part of a larger project on the development of an appropriateness and necessity rating tool to identify patients of all ages with potentially resectable focal epilepsy. The search yielded 5,061 articles related to epilepsy surgery and of the 763 articles meeting the inclusion criteria and reviewed in full text, 68 reported psychiatric outcomes. Thirteen articles met the final eligibility criteria., Key Findings: The studies demonstrated either improvements in psychiatric outcome postsurgery or no changes in psychiatric outcome. Only one study demonstrated deterioration in psychiatric status after surgery, with higher anxiety in the context of continued seizures post-surgery. One study reported a significantly increased rate of psychosis after surgery. The two main predictors of psychiatric outcome were seizure freedom and presurgical psychiatric history. De novo psychiatric conditions occurred postsurgery at a rate of 1.1-18.2%, with milder psychiatric issues (e.g., adjustment disorder) being more common than more severe psychiatric issues (e.g., psychosis)., Significance: Overall, studies demonstrated either improvement in psychiatric outcomes postsurgery or no change. However, there is a need for more prospective, well-controlled studies to better delineate the prevalence and severity of psychiatric conditions occurring in the context of epilepsy surgery, and to identify specific predictors of psychiatric outcomes after epilepsy surgery., (Wiley Periodicals, Inc. © 2011 International League Against Epilepsy.)

Objective: To explore the prevalence of overweight and obesity in patients with migraine., Background: Previous studies support the concept that obesity is an exacerbating factor for migraine. Also, some studies have found an increased frequency of obesity and overweight in migraine patients compared to the normal population., Methods: We studied 1,371 patients with migraine and 612 controls. The migraine population was matched by gender with a healthy control group., Results: Mean age of patients with migraine was 38.0 +/- 13.3 years and in the controls it was 34.8 +/- 12.1 years. The percentage of females in both groups was similar (migraine 81.6% vs. control 83.3%, p = 0.40). The distribution of body mass index (BMI) in migraine patients and controls was as follows: underweight patients (BMI <18.5) 3.1% migraine versus controls 1.5%; normal (BMI 18.5-24.9) 44.8% migraine versus controls 47.1%; overweight (BMI 25-29.9) 38.3% migraine versus controls 33.7%; obese (BMI 30-34.5) 10.3% migraine versus controls 13.6%; morbidly obese (BMI 35) 3.4% migraine versus controls 4.2%. Overweight and obesity in migraine patients versus controls were statistically significant. No association was found between the disability and severity of migraine and BMI., Conclusions: This study did not find associations between severity or disability of migraine and BMI., (Copyright (c) 2010 S. Karger AG, Basel.)

Background: Video-electroencephalography (VEEG) telemetry is the simultaneous recording of ictal and interictal EEG pattern and paroxysmal behavior to investigate the nature of paroxysmal events., Methods: This is a prospective study performed to asses the safety and yield of early discontinuation of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) in the telemetry unit. Over a 2.5-year period, 50 patients that met the indications for VEEG monitoring were admitted by an epileptologist to neuro-observation units with continuous monitoring, nursing coverage and EEG technicians support during working hours and on-call thereafter. In most cases AEDs (except Phenobarbital) were discontinued in 24h. We prospectively assessed the yield and safety of the telemetry investigation as well as epilepsy surgery outcomes., Results: Our monitoring answered the study question in 88% of the patients. The question was not answered in 12% of cases due to the lack of recorded events. Our results changed the management in 74% of cases and potentially improved quality of life by decreasing the AEDs consumption and number of seizures per month. Over all, 22% received epilepsy surgery and became either seizure free or their seizures became non-disabling. Our method significantly decreased the duration of hospital admission for monitoring and minimal complications occurred only in 8% of patients., Conclusions: In conclusion, our method for short VEEG monitoring has a high yield for diagnosis, minimal complications and is cost effective. These qualities, together with good surgery results validate our method for the investigation and treatment of refractory seizure cases.