Search

Objective: To determine cutoff values for the diagnosis of atlantoaxial instability (AAI) based on cross-sectional imaging in small-breed dogs., Study Design: Retrospective multicenter study., Sample Population: Client-owned dogs (n = 123) and 28 cadavers., Methods: Dogs were assigned to three groups: a control group, a "potentially unstable" group, and an AAI-affected group, according to imaging findings and clinical signs. The ventral compression index (VCI), cranial translation ratio (CTR), C1-C2 overlap, C1-C2 angle, atlantoaxial distance, basion-dens interval, dens-to-axis length ratio (DALR), power ratio, and clivus canal angles were measured on CT or T2-weighted magnetic resonance (MR) images. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed to define cutoff values in flexed (≥25°) and extended (<25°) head positions., Results: Cutoff values for the VCI of ≥0.16 in extended and ≥0.2 in flexed head positions were diagnostic for AAI (sensitivity of 100% and 100%, specificity of 94.54% and 96.67%, respectively). Cutoff values for the other measurements were defined with a lower sensitivity (75%-96%) and specificity (70%-97%). A combination of the measurements did not increase the sensitivity and specificity compared with the VCI as single measurement., Conclusion: Cutoff values for several imaging measurements were established with good sensitivity and specificity. The VCI, defined as the ratio between the ventral and dorsal atlantodental interval, had the highest sensitivity and specificity in both head positions., Clinical Significance: The use of defined cutoff values allows an objective diagnosis of AAI in small-breed dogs. The decision for surgical intervention, however, should remain based on a combination of clinical and imaging findings., (© 2022 The Authors. Veterinary Surgery published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American College of Veterinary Surgeons.)

Objective:  The main purpose of this study was to define criteria to systemically describe craniovertebral junction (CVJ) anomalies and to report the prevalence of CVJ anomalies in small breed dogs with and without atlantoaxial instability (AAI)., Materials and Methods:  Retrospective multicentre matched case-control study evaluating magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomographic images of small breed dogs with and without AAI for the presence of CVJ anomalies., Results:  One hundred and twenty-two dogs were enrolled (61 with and 61 without AAI). Only dogs with AAI had dens axis anomalies such as separation ( n  = 20) or a short-rounded conformation ( n  = 35). Patients with AAI were more likely to have atlantooccipital overlapping based on transection of McRae's line by the dorsal arch of the atlas (odds ratio [OR] = 5.62, p  < 0.01), a transection of Wackenheim's clivus line (OR = 41.62, p  < 0.01) and rostral indentation of the occipital bone (OR = 2.79, p  < 0.05). Patients with AAI were less likely to have a larger clivus canal angle (OR = 0.94, p  < 0.01) and larger occipital bone lengths (OR = 0.89, p  < 0.05)., Clinical Significance:  Small breed dogs with AAI are more likely to have other CVJ anomalies such as atlantooccipital overlapping or dens anomalies. The grade of brachycephaly does not differ between patients with and without AAI. Certain objective criteria from human literature were found useful for the assessment of both AAI and atlantooccipital overlapping such as McRae's line, Wackenheim's clivus line, and clivus canal angle. The classification criteria used can help to evaluate CVJ anomalies in a more systematic way., Competing Interests: The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest in the research. Author Contribution Maja A. Waschk and Christina Precht contributed to conception of study, study design and acquisition of data and data analysis and interpretation. Beatriz Vidondo contributed to study design and data analysis and interpretation. Franck Forterre contributed to conception of study and study design. Inés Carrera, Angel M. Hernandez-Guerra, Pierre Moissonnier, Ioannis N. Plessas, Martin J. Schmidt and Dietmar Schnötzinger contributed to acquisition of data. All authors drafted, revised and approved the submitted manuscript., (Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.)