Search

Contains fulltext : 71393.pdf (Publisher’s version ) (Open Access) BACKGROUND: Chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) is transmitted by blood-blood contact and this leads to high HCV prevalence in risk populations such as haemophilia patients and intravenous drug users. The prevalence in the general Dutch population is unknown, although it appears to be very low in screened blood donors (0.0169%). AIM: The objective of this study is to estimate the prevalence of HCV in a general population sample living in an urbanized region in the Netherlands. METHODS: We randomly selected 2200 EDTA blood samples that had been submitted for analysis of biochemical parameters to a regional servicing laboratory for general practitioners (SHO, Arnhem/Nijmegen, the Netherlands). HCV antibody testing was performed using a three-step approach. For initial screening, an enzyme immunoassay (Bioelisa HCV 4.0, Biokit, Spain) was used. Positive samples were subjected to a second, microparticle enzyme-linked immunoassay (AxSYM HCV version 3.0, Abbott laboratories, IL , USA). Genotypes were determined by Line Probe Assay. RESULTS: A total of four persons (two females, two males) (0.2%) tested positive for HCV antibodies. The average OD/cut-off ratio of the screening assay was 2.9 (range 1.0 to 7.3) and serological findings were confirmed using a specific second immunoassay. HCV RNA (genotype 1b) was found in the sera of two persons. CONCLUSION: The HCV prevalence in our sample of the Dutch population was 0.2% which accords with earlier estimates from prevalence studies in the Netherlands.

Contains fulltext : 48256.pdf (Publisher’s version ) (Closed access) OBJECTIVES: To describe the variation in the numbers of imaging investigations requested by general practitioners (GPs) and to find likely explanations for this variation. METHODS: Cross-sectional survey of the use of eight imaging investigations by 229 GPs collaborating in 40 local GP groups from five regions in the Netherlands during 1997. A multivariable, multilevel regression analysis was used to link these data with survey data on professional characteristics such as knowledge about and attitude towards test ordering, and with data on contextual factors such as practice type or experience with feedback on test-ordering data. RESULTS: Data for 221 GPs (97%) were available. After adjustment for practice size and working time, the median number of imaging investigations ordered per GP was 148 (interquartile range 71 to 300), with large differences (up to twofold) between the regions (P