Search

The aim of our investigation was to obtain a well-characterized active apple extract suitable for both in vivo and in vitro diagnostics by a technically simple method. For this purpose, apple extracts were prepared by homogenization in potassium phosphate buffer or by precipitation in organic solvents and resolubilization in potassium phosphate buffer in the presence or in the absence of enzyme inhibitors. These extracts were comparatively investigated by means of SDS- PAGE, two-dimensional electrophoresis, immunoblotting, RAST inhibition, and prick test. The in vitro investigations indicated that extracts prepared by precipitation in organic solvents (diacetone alcohol) at -20°C have a higher allergen activity than those prepared by extraction in aqueous solutions. From the in vivo tests (prick test), it was concluded that application of inhibitors of cytoplasmic enzymes (phenol oxidases, peroxidases, proteases) already during extraction is an essential precondition for active prick test solutions. Correspondingly, the extract obtained by solvent precipitation in the presence of enzyme inhibitors appeared to be most suitable for clinical application. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the long-term safety and therapeutic effects of IFN-alpha in patients with severe persistent uncontrolled asthma on long-term oral glucocorticoid (GC) treatment., Patients and Methods: The study included 16 patients (2 male, 14 female; age 39 years [range: 24 - 63]) with severe persistent asthma. Diagnosis and severity classification of asthma were established according to the guidelines of the "Deutsche Atemwegsliga". Eight patients stopped the therapy within 7 months due to side effects (n = 3), costs not covered by health insurance (n = 2), non-compliance (n = 2), and change of residence (n = 1). 8 patients (8 female, age 49 years [range: 35 - 68], duration of disease 16 years [range: 5 - 24]) were treated for at least 12 months with IFN-alpha (9 microg) 3 times/week. All patients were on oral glucocorticoids (GCs) for more than 5 years (average dose 17.5 [range: 5.0 - 64.0] mg/d). Clinical signs, lung function, need for reliever medication, number of emergency visits and hospitalisations and diary were assessed prior to and after 12 months of treatment. Data are given as percent of normal or median [range]., Results: IFN-alpha improved lung function after 12 months: FEV1 64 vs. 75 %; FEV1/IVC 76 vs. 89 %; RV 153 % vs. 129 %; Rtot 193 vs. 111 % and morning PEF by 50 - 190 L/min. IFN-alpha also significantly reduced the use of reliever medication (10 [2 - 20] vs. 1 [0 - 3] puffs/d), nocturnal awakening (11 [4 - 30] vs. 1 [0 - 5]/month), emergency visits (7 [2 - 15] vs. 0 [0 - 5]/month) and hospitalisations (4 [1 - 8] vs. 0 [0 - 5]/year). In 5 patients the asthma attacks and nightly disturbances disappeared completely. The improvements were achieved despite a tapering of the oral GCs in all patients from 17.5 (5.0 - 64.0) to 2 (0 - 16) mg/d. In 5 patients GC treatment could be discontinued. The number of blood eosinophils decreased from 0.46 to 0.28 Gpt/L. Adverse events were transient and usually decreased within 3 to 4 weeks. Two patients developed an autoimmune thyreoiditis., Conclusion: In severe persistent, uncontrolled, and GC-dependent asthma, treatment with IFN-alpha leads to sustained clinical improvement and allows the reduction or discontinuation of oral GCs. Severe side effects may occur in isolated cases.

The following guideline of the "Arbeitsgruppe Nahrungsmittelallergie der DGAKI" (Task Force on Food Allergy of the German Society of Allergology and Clinical Immunology) and the ADA ("Arzteverband Deutscher Allergologen", Medical Association of German Allergologists) and the GPA (German Society of Pediatric Allergology) summarizes the approach to be taken when food allergy is suspected in patients with atopic dermatitis (neurodermatitis, atopic eczema). The problem is clinically relevant because many patients assume that allergic reactions against foods are responsible for triggering or worsening their eczema. It is important to identify those patients who will benefit from an elimination diet but also to avoid unnecessary diets. Elimination diets (especially in early childhood) are associated with the risk of malnutrition and additional emotional stress for the patients. The gold standard for the diagnosis of food-dependent reactions is to perform placebo-controlled, double-blind oral food challenges because specific IgE, prick tests and history often do not correlate with clinical reactivity. This is particularly true in the case of delayed eczematous skin reactions. Diagnostic elimination diets should be used before an oral provocation test. If multiple sensitizations against foods are discovered in a patient, an oligoallergenic diet and a subsequent stepwise supplementation of the nutrition should be performed. If a specific food is suspected of triggering food allergy, oral provocation should be performed after a diagnostic elimination diet. As eczema-tous skin reactions may develop slowly (i. e. within one or two day), the skin be inspected the day after the provocation test and that a repetitive test be performed if the patient has not reacted to a given food on the first day of oral provocation. The guideline discusses various clinical situations for patients with atopic dermatitis to facilitate differentiated diagnostic procedures.

Chronic urticaria, recurrent angioedema and non-allergic asthma have all been associated with pseudoallergic reactions to food ingredients. For atopic dermatitis and diseases of the gastrointestinal tract, this association is controversial. Pseudoallergic reactions can be elicited by additives as well as by natural food ingredients. An altered histamine metabolism may be associated with pseudoallergy. Acute urticaria or a short episode of angioedema is not an indication for exhaustive evaluation. If basic diagnostic screening is negative in chronic urticaria, a low-pseudoallergen diet can be considered. Skin and serological tests are not objective diagnostic parameters for pseudoallergic reactions. The severity of symptoms should be documented while the patient is on a low-pseudoaller-gen diet. Oral provocation with additives leads to reproducible symptoms only in a few cases. Therefore, if a low-pseudoallergen diet brings improvement, the patient is then exposed to a pseudoallergen-rich "super meal". After a positive reaction to the "super meal" the challenge with additives takes place in the form of collective group exposition. When the patient has asthma or a history of anaphylac-toid reactions, testing with individual substances in carefully increasing dosages is required. The suspicion of adverse reactions against histamine can be confirmed by a challenge with histamine dihydrochloride. In the case of respiratory symptoms, provocation by inhalation should be considered. Objectifying symptoms especially in gastrointestinal diseases is mandatory and should include double-blind placebo-controlled food challenge, if possible.

Skin testing has a central role in the diagnosis of food allergy. Prick testing is well- established as a routine diagnostic tool. Nonetheless, unstable allergens and the lack of standardized extracts create difficulties in the identification of sensitization to foods in patients with suspected food allergy. Therefore prick-to-prick tests with native (raw, fresh) foods are still recommended. The indications and contraindications are the same as those of routine skin testing in clinical allergology. We recommend a careful and restricted application of skin tests in patients with a history of severe anaphylaxis to foods.

Background: Aluminium-adsorbed six grass pollen allergoid therapy for 2 years was found to be efficacious and safe in patients with hay fever and seasonal asthma. Using high-dose, hypoallergenic allergen products (allergoids) enables a short-term pre-seasonal treatment regimen. However, it is not known whether further treatment beyond 2 yrs had any additional benefit., Methods: Following an initial 2-year randomized, double-blind, multi-centre, placebo-controlled clinical trial in 154 grass pollen-allergic patients, an additional short course of specific immunotherapy with the high-dose, hypoallergenic grass pollen preparation Allergovit was performed in 61 patients of the active treatment group during the 3rd open-label treatment year., Results: Further treatment of patients with the Allergovit 6-grass pollen preparation resulted in a further reduction of symptom medication score and improved quality of life in comparison to the first and second treatment year. Changes in allergen-specific IgG4 levels supported these results., Conclusions: Pre-seasonal short-term immunotherapy with the high-dose, hypoallergenic allergen preparation Allergovit has been shown to be efficacious and safe. A course of three years of 6-grass pollen SIT further improves allergic symptoms, quality of life and reduces the need for anti-allergic medication.

Guidelines for bronchial allergen provocation tests, first published in 1984, are updated by this paper. This version has been compiled in repeated meetings of a panel of experts after evaluation of the publications available. Precise statements regarding indications, contraindications, after safety measures are given. Three evidence-based protocols are submitted in detail.

The goal of asthma management is to achieve control of the condition. This essentially requires environmental control measures (allergen avoidance) and patient training and education. Drug treatment comprises anti-inflammatory (corticosteroids), and bronchodilatory controller therapy (long-acting beta 2-sympathomimetics, leukotriene receptor antagonists, retarded theophylline) as well as bronchodilatory medication as required (short-acting beta 2-sympathomimetics). The number and frequency of pharmacologic therapy relates to the severity of the clinical presentation. The combination of certain controller drugs (corticosteroids with long-acting beta 2-agonists, corticosteroids with leukotriene receptor antagonists, and beta 2-agonists with leukotriene receptor antagonists) yields a synergistic therapeutic effect as well as a compliance advantage.

Fruit allergy is frequently associated with birch pollinosis. The aim of this study was to investigate which kiwi allergens were involved in subjects allergic to fruit alone and in patients allergic to both fruit and birch pollen. Sera of nine patients (five with both kiwi and birch pollen allergy and four with isolated kiwi allergy) were studied by immunoblot of kiwi extract. Eight of the nine sera reacted with the 30 kDa protein. Furthermore, IgE-binding proteins were seen at approximately 23 kDa (detected by five sera), 43 kDa and 80 kDa (four sera), and > 80 kDa (two sera). One serum showed no IgE binding to any kiwi allergen. The 30 kDa is the major allergen in kiwi and was purified by anion-exchange chromatography and characterized by isoelectrofocusing and amino acid sequencing. The comparison of its partial amino acid sequence with data from the Swiss Protein Bank revealed that this protein is actinidine. The carbohydrate structures in kiwi and birch pollen extracts were investigated with seven lectins. On kiwi blot, Aleuria aurantia agglutinin showed strong reactivity (indicating fucose residues) to the components of 35 to 92 kDa, while concanavalin A (indicating mannose, glucose or N-acetylglucosamine residues) showed weak binding at 67 kDa. In contrast, strong binding of Galanthus nivalis agglutinin (indicating mannose residues) and concanavalin A was found on birch pollen blots. The presence of IgE against carbohydrate structures was determined by means of enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) after periodate treatment of kiwi extract. The IgE binding was reduced by periodate treatment of kiwi coated microtiter plates, but not by sera reacting exclusively with the 30 kDa protein. Furthermore, selected sera were treated with proteinase K-digested kiwi and birch pollen extracts as the sources of crossreactive carbohydrate determinants. In accordance with the results of sodium periodate treatment, significant levels of anti-cross-reactive carbohydrate determinant IgE were found in sera from patients allergic to both kiwi and birch pollen. Our results show that the major allergen for kiwi allergy is the 30 kDa protein and additionally that the cross-reaction between kiwi and birch pollen allergy is mainly due to carbohydrate moieties.