Search

The antiepileptic drug (AED) candidate, (4R)-4-(2-chloro-2,2-difluoroethyl)-1-{[2-(methoxymethyl)-6-(trifluoromethyl)imidazo[2,1-b][1,3,4]thiadiazol-5-yl]methyl}pyrrolidin-2-one (padsevonil), is the first in a novel class of drugs that bind to synaptic vesicle protein 2 (SV2) proteins and the GABAA receptor benzodiazepine site, allowing for pre- and postsynaptic activity, respectively. In acute seizure models, padsevonil provided potent, dose-dependent protection against seizures induced by administration of pilocarpine or 11-deoxycortisol, and those induced acoustically or through 6 Hz stimulation; it was less potent in the pentylenetetrazol, bicuculline, and maximal electroshock models. Padsevonil displayed dose-dependent protective effects in chronic epilepsy models, including the intrahippocampal kainate and Genetic Absence Epilepsy Rats from Strasbourg models, which represent human mesial temporal lobe and absence epilepsy, respectively. In the amygdala kindling model, which is predictive of efficacy against focal to bilateral tonic-clonic seizures, padsevonil provided significant protection in kindled rodents; in mice specifically, it was the most potent AED compared with nine others with different mechanisms of action. Its therapeutic index was also the highest, potentially translating into a favorable efficacy and tolerability profile in humans. Importantly, in contrast to diazepam, tolerance to padsevonil's antiseizure effects was not observed in the pentylenetetrazol-induced clonic seizure threshold test. Further results in the 6 Hz model showed that padsevonil provided significantly greater protection than the combination of diazepam with either 2S-(2-oxo-1-pyrrolidinyl)butanamide (levetiracetam) or 2S-2-[(4R)-2-oxo-4-propylpyrrolidin-1-yl] butanamide (brivaracetam), both selective SV2A ligands. This observation suggests that padsevonil's unique mechanism of action confers antiseizure properties beyond the combination of compounds targeting SV2A and the benzodiazepine site. Overall, padsevonil displayed robust efficacy across validated seizure and epilepsy models, including those considered to represent drug-resistant epilepsy. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Padsevonil, a first-in-class antiepileptic drug candidate, targets SV2 proteins and the benzodiazepine site of GABAA receptors. It demonstrated robust efficacy across a broad range of rodent seizure and epilepsy models, several representing drug-resistant epilepsy. Furthermore, in one rodent model, its efficacy extended beyond the combination of drugs interacting separately with SV2 or the benzodiazepine site. Padsevonil displayed a high therapeutic index, potentially translating into a favorable safety profile in humans; tolerance to antiseizure effects was not observed.

Summary Objective Brivaracetam (BRV) and levetiracetam (LEV) are antiepileptic drugs that bind synaptic vesicle glycoprotein 2A (SV2A). In vitro and in vivo animal studies suggest faster brain penetration and SV2A occupancy (SO) after dosing with BRV than LEV. We evaluated human brain penetration and SO time course of BRV and LEV at therapeutically relevant doses using the SV2A positron emission tomography (PET) tracer 11C‐UCB‐J (EP0074; NCT02602860). Methods Healthy volunteers were recruited into three cohorts. Cohort 1 (n = 4) was examined with PET at baseline and during displacement after intravenous BRV (100 mg) or LEV (1500 mg). Cohort 2 (n = 5) was studied during displacement and 4 hours postdose (BRV 50‐200 mg or LEV 1500 mg). Cohort 3 (n = 4) was examined at baseline and steady state after 4 days of twice‐daily oral dosing of BRV (50‐100 mg) and 4 hours postdose of LEV (250‐600 mg). Half‐time of 11C‐UCB‐J signal change was computed from displacement measurements. Half‐saturation concentrations (IC 50) were determined from calculated SO. Results Observed tracer displacement half‐times were 18 ± 6 minutes for BRV (100 mg, n = 4), 9.7 and 10.1 minutes for BRV (200 mg, n = 2), and 28 ± 6 minutes for LEV (1500 mg, n = 6). Estimated corrected half‐times were 8 minutes shorter. The SO was 66%‐70% for 100 mg intravenous BRV, 84%‐85% for 200 mg intravenous BRV, and 78%‐84% for intravenous 1500 mg LEV. The IC 50 of BRV (0.46 μg/mL) was 8.7‐fold lower than of LEV (4.02 μg/mL). BRV data fitted a single SO versus plasma concentration relationship. Steady state SO for 100 mg BRV was 86%‐87% (peak) and 76%‐82% (trough). Significance BRV achieves high SO more rapidly than LEV when intravenously administered at therapeutic doses. Thus, BRV may have utility in treating acute seizures; further clinical studies are needed for confirmation.

Purpose To understand the currently available post-marketing real-world evidence of the incidences of and discontinuations due to the BAEs of irritability, anger, and aggression in people with epilepsy (PWE) treated with the anti-seizure medications (ASMs) brivaracetam (BRV), levetiracetam (LEV), perampanel (PER), and topiramate (TPM), as well as behavioral adverse events (BAEs) in PWE switching from LEV to BRV. Methods A systematic review of published literature using the Cochrane Library, PubMed/MEDLINE, and Embase was performed to identify retrospective and prospective observational studies reporting the incidence of irritability, anger, or aggression with BRV, LEV, PER, or TPM in PWE. The incidences of these BAEs and the rates of discontinuation due to each were categorized by ASM, and where possible, weighted means were calculated but not statistically assessed. Behavioral and psychiatric adverse events in PWE switching from LEV to BRV were summarized descriptively. Results A total of 1500 records were identified in the searches. Of these, 44 published articles reporting 42 studies met the study criteria and were included in the data synthesis, 7 studies were identified in the clinical trial database, and 5 studies included PWE switching from LEV to BRV. Studies included a variety of methods, study populations, and definitions of BAEs. While a wide range of results was reported across studies, weighted mean incidences were 5.6% for BRV, 9.9% for LEV, 12.3% for PER, and 3.1% for TPM for irritability; 3.3%* for BRV, 2.5% for LEV, 2.0% for PER, and 0.2%* for TPM for anger; and 2.5% for BRV, 2.6% for LEV, 4.4% for PER, and 0.5%* for TPM for aggression. Weighted mean discontinuation rates were 0.8%* for BRV, 3.4% for LEV, 3.0% for PER, and 2.2% for TPM for irritability and 0.8%* for BRV, 2.4% for LEV, 9.2% for PER, and 1.2%* for TPM for aggression. There were no discontinuations for anger. Switching from LEV to BRV led to improvement in BAEs in 33.3% to 83.0% of patients (weighted mean, 66.6%). *Denotes only 1 study. Conclusions This systematic review characterizes the incidences of irritability, anger, and aggression with BRV, LEV, PER, and TPM, and it provides robust real-world evidence demonstrating that switching from LEV to BRV may improve BAEs. While additional data remain valuable due to differences in methodology (which make comparisons difficult), these results improve understanding of the real-world incidences of discontinuations due to these BAEs in clinical practice and can aid in discussions and treatment decision-making with PWE.

Brivaracetam (BRV) is a selective, high-affinity ligand for synaptic vesicle protein 2A (SV2A), recently approved as adjunctive treatment for drug-refractory partial-onset seizures in adults. BRV binds SV2A with higher affinity than levetiracetam (LEV), and was shown to have a differential interaction with SV2A. Because LEV was reported to interact with multiple excitatory and inhibitory ligand-gated ion channels and that may impact its pharmacological profile, we were interested in determining whether BRV directly modulates inhibitory and excitatory ionotropic receptors in central neurons. Voltage-clamp experiments were performed in primary cultures of mouse hippocampal neurons. At a supratherapeutic concentration of 100 mu m, BRV was devoid of any direct effect on currents gated by -aminobutyric acidergic type A, glycine, kainate, N-methyl-D-aspartate, and alpha-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid. Similarly to LEV, BRV reveals a potent ability to oppose the action of negative modulators on the inhibitory receptors. In conclusion, these results show that BRV contrasts with LEV by not displaying any direct action on inhibitory or excitatory postsynaptic ligand-gated receptors at therapeutic concentrations and thereby support BRV's role as a selective SV2A ligand. These findings add further evidence to the validity of SV2A as a relevant antiepileptic drug target and emphasize the potential for exploring further presynaptic mechanisms as a novel approach to antiepileptic drug discovery. G.M. and J.-M.R. have served as paid consultants for UCB. All other authors are employed by UCB.

SummaryObjective To evaluate acute and long-term effects of intravenous brivaracetam (BRV) and BRV + diazepam (DZP) combination treatment in a rat model of self-sustaining status epilepticus (SSSE). Methods Rats were treated with BRV (10 mg/kg) 10 min after initiation of perforant path stimulation (PPS) as early treatment; or BRV (10–300 mg/kg), DZP (1 mg/kg), or BRV (0.3–10 mg/kg) + DZP (1 mg/kg) 10 min after the end of PPS (established SSSE). Seizure activity was recorded electrographically for 24 h posttreatment (acute effects), and for 1 week at 6–8 weeks or 12 months' posttreatment (long-term effects). All treatments were compared with control rats using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Bonferroni's test, or Kruskal-–Wallis and Dunn's multiple comparison tests, when appropriate. Results Treatment of established SSSE with BRV (10–300 mg/kg) resulted in dose-dependent reduction in SSSE duration and cumulative seizure time, achieving statistical significance at doses ≥100 mg/kg. Lower doses of BRV (0.3–10 mg/kg) + low-dose DZP (1 mg/kg) significantly reduced SSSE duration and number of seizures. All control rats developed spontaneous recurrent seizures (SRS) 6–8 weeks after SSSE, whereas seizure freedom was noted in 2/10, 5/10, and 6/10 rats treated with BRV 200 mg/kg, 300 mg/kg, and BRV 10 mg/kg + DZP, respectively. BRV (10–300 mg/kg) showed a dose-dependent trend toward reduction of SRS frequency, cumulative seizure time, and spike frequency, achieving statistical significance at 300 mg/kg. Combination of BRV (10 mg/kg) + DZP significantly reduced SRS frequency, cumulative seizure time, and spike frequency. In the 12-month follow-up study, BRV (0.3–10 mg/kg) + low-dose DZP markedly reduced SRS frequency, cumulative seizure time, and spike frequency, achieving statistical significance at some doses. Early treatment of SSSE with BRV 10 mg/kg significantly reduced long-term SRS frequency. Significance These findings support clinical evaluation of BRV for treatment of status epilepticus or acute repetitive seizures.

Prevention of epilepsy is a great unmet need. Acute central nervous system (CNS) insults such as traumatic brain injury (TBI), cerebrovascular accidents (CVA), and CNS infections account for 15%-20% of all epilepsy. Following TBI and CVA, there is a latency of days to years before epilepsy develops. This allows treatment to prevent or modify postinjury epilepsy. No such treatment exists. In animal models of acquired epilepsy, a number of medications in clinical use for diverse indications have been shown to have antiepileptogenic or disease-modifying effects, including medications with excellent side effect profiles. These include atorvastatin, ceftriaxone, losartan, isoflurane, N-acetylcysteine, and the antiseizure medications levetiracetam, brivaracetam, topiramate, gabapentin, pregabalin, vigabatrin, and eslicarbazepine acetate. In addition, there are preclinical antiepileptogenic data for anakinra, rapamycin, fingolimod, and erythropoietin, although these medications have potential for more serious side effects. However, except for vigabatrin, there have been almost no translation studies to prevent or modify epilepsy using these potentially "repurposable" medications. We may be missing an opportunity to develop preventive treatment for epilepsy by not evaluating these medications clinically. One reason for the lack of translation studies is that the preclinical data for most of these medications are disparate in terms of types of injury, models within different injury type, dosing, injury-treatment initiation latencies, treatment duration, and epilepsy outcome evaluation mode and duration. This makes it difficult to compare the relative strength of antiepileptogenic evidence across the molecules, and difficult to determine which drug(s) would be the best to evaluate clinically. Furthermore, most preclinical antiepileptogenic studies lack information needed for translation, such as dose-blood level relationship, brain target engagement, and dose-response, and many use treatment parameters that cannot be applied clinically, for example, treatment initiation before or at the time of injury and dosing higher than tolerated human equivalent dosing. Here, we review animal and human antiepileptogenic evidence for these medications. We highlight the gaps in our knowledge for each molecule that need to be filled in order to consider clinical translation, and we suggest a platform of preclinical antiepileptogenesis evaluation of potentially repurposable molecules or their combinations going forward.

Translating preclinical epilepsy therapy research into clinical therapeutic products requires an understanding of the regulatory requirements pertaining to drug development. In this chapter, we discuss regulatory considerations in the development of new molecular entities, or the repurposing of approved drugs for the treatment of epilepsy, as an investigator moves a potential drug therapy through discovery, preclinical and clinical development, and approval. We provide an overview of relevant guidances and harmonization by regulatory agencies, and the regulatory process and requirements for studying drugs in humans. Specifically, this chapter summarizes the process for submitting and maintaining an investigation new drug (IND) application, and provides an overview of the required IND content, including preclinical pharmacology and toxicology study summaries; chemistry, manufacturing, and controls information; previous human experience; and the clinical investigation plan. These components are discussed with an emphasis on preclinical testing specific for epilepsy. Last, the topics of repurposing an approved drug and obtaining orphan drug designation are highlighted as special considerations that may be important for investigator-initiated research in epilepsy.

Aims Synaptic vesicle proteins 2 (SV2) are neuronal vesicles membrane glycoproteins that appear as important targets in the treatment of partial and generalized epilepsies. Therefore, we analysed the expression of SV2 isoforms in the hippocampus of patients with temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE). Methods SV2A, SV2B and SV2C immunostaining and QuantiGene branched DNA assay were performed on biopsies from 31 consecutive TLE patients with mesial temporal sclerosis (MTS) and compared with 10 autopsy controls. SV2 expression was further compared with Timm's staining, and synaptophysin, Zinc transporter 3 (ZnT3), dynorphin, vesicular glutamate transporter 1 (VGLUT1) and vesicular GABA transporter (VGAT) expression. Results In TLE patients, SV2A and SV2B expression was decreased in areas of synaptic loss. SV2C, which is weakly expressed or absent in the hippocampus of controls, was overexpressed in 10/11 cases with classical MTS1A and mossy fibre sprouting but not in cases with other types of MTS. SV2C staining was located in the inner molecular layer of the dentate gyrus and colocalized with dynorphin, ZnT3 and VGLUT1, suggesting selective expression in presynaptic glutamatergic Zn2+-rich terminals of abnormal sprouting fibres. SV2 expression patterns correlated with histological subtypes of MTS, but not with clinical features or therapeutic regimens in this patient cohort. Conclusion In classical MTS1A, the expression of SV2 isoforms is altered with a marked decrease of SV2A and SV2B paralleling synaptic loss and a selective increase of SV2C in sprouting mossy fibres. These findings suggest a different physiology of sprouting synapses and the possibility to target them with SV2C-specific strategies.

Despite the introduction of over 15 third-generation anti-epileptic drugs, current medications fail to control seizures in 20-30% of patients. However, our understanding of the mechanisms mediating the development of epilepsy and the causes of drug resistance has grown substantially over the past decade, providing opportunities for the discovery and development of more efficacious anti-epileptic and anti-epileptogenic drugs. In this Review we discuss how previous preclinical models and clinical trial designs may have hampered the discovery of better treatments. We propose that future anti-epileptic drug development may be improved through a new joint endeavour between academia and the industry, through the identification and application of tools for new target-driven approaches, and through comparative preclinical proof-of-concept studies and innovative clinical trials designs.

There is a pressing need to address the current major gaps in epilepsy treatment, in particular drug-resistant epilepsy, antiepileptogenic therapies, and comorbidities. A major concern in the development of new therapies is that current preclinical testing is not sufficiently predictive for clinical efficacy. Methodologic limitations of current preclinical paradigms may partly account for this discrepancy. Here we propose and discuss a strategy for implementing a "phase II" multicenter preclinical drug trial model based on clinical phase II/III studies designed to generate more rigorous preclinical data for efficacy. The goal is to improve the evidence resulting from preclinical studies for investigational new drugs that have shown strong promise in initial preclinical "phase I" studies. This should reduce the risk for expensive clinical studies in epilepsy and therefore increase the appeal for funders (industry and government) to invest in their clinical development.

On March 10 to March 12, 2015, the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke and the Tuberous Sclerosis Alliance sponsored a workshop in Bethesda, Maryland, to assess progress and new opportunities for research in tuberous sclerosis complex with the goal of updating the 2003 Research Plan for Tuberous Sclerosis (http://www.ninds.nih.gov/about_ninds/plans/tscler_research_plan.htm). In addition to the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke and Tuberous Sclerosis Alliance, participants in the strategic planning effort and workshop included representatives from six other Institutes of the National Institutes of Health, the Department of Defense Tuberous Sclerosis Complex Research Program, and a broad cross-section of basic scientists and clinicians with expertise in tuberous sclerosis complex along with representatives from the pharmaceutical industry. Here we summarize the outcomes from the extensive premeeting deliberations and final workshop recommendations, including (1) progress in the field since publication of the initial 2003 research plan for tuberous sclerosis complex, (2) the key gaps, needs, and challenges that hinder progress in tuberous sclerosis complex research, and (3) a new set of research priorities along with specific recommendations for addressing the major challenges in each priority area. The new research plan is organized around both short-term and long-term goals with the expectation that progress toward specific objectives can be achieved within a five to ten year time frame.

Despite availability of effective antiepileptic drugs (AEDs), many patients with epilepsy continue to experience refractory seizures and adverse events. Achievement of better seizure control and fewer side effects is key to improving quality of life. This review describes the rationale for the discovery and preclinical profile of brivaracetam (BRV), currently under regulatory review as adjunctive therapy for adults with partial-onset seizures. The discovery of BRV was triggered by the novel mechanism of action and atypical properties of levetiracetam (LEV) in preclinical seizure and epilepsy models. LEV is associated with several mechanisms that may contribute to its antiepileptic properties and adverse effect profile. Early findings observed a moderate affinity for a unique brain-specific LEV binding site (LBS) that correlated with anticonvulsant effects in animal models of epilepsy. This provided a promising molecular target and rationale for identifying selective, high-affinity ligands for LBS with potential for improved antiepileptic properties. The later discovery that synaptic vesicle protein 2A (SV2A) was the molecular correlate of LBS confirmed the novelty of the target. A drug discovery program resulted in the identification of anticonvulsants, comprising two distinct families of high-affinity SV2A ligands possessing different pharmacologic properties. Among these, BRV differed significantly from LEV by its selective, high affinity and differential interaction with SV2A as well as a higher lipophilicity, correlating with more potent and complete seizure suppression, as well as a more rapid brain penetration in preclinical models. Initial studies in animal models also revealed BRV had a greater antiepileptogenic potential than LEV. These properties of BRV highlight its promising potential as an AED that might provide broad-spectrum efficacy, associated with a promising tolerability profile and a fast onset of action. BRV represents the first selective SV2A ligand for epilepsy treatment and may add a significant contribution to the existing armamentarium of AEDs.

The antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) introduced during the past two decades have provided several benefits: they offered new treatment options for symptomatic treatment of seizures, improved ease of use and tolerability, and lowered risk for hypersensitivity reactions and detrimental drug-drug interactions. These drugs, however, neither attenuated the problem of drug-refractory epilepsy nor proved capable of preventing or curing the disease. Therefore, new preclinical screening strategies are needed to identify AEDs that target these unmet medical needs. New therapies may derive from novel targets identified on the basis of existing hypotheses for drug-refractory epilepsy and the biology of epileptogenesis; from research on genetics, transcriptomics, and epigenetics; and from mechanisms relevant for other therapy areas. Novel targets should be explored using new preclinical screening strategies, and new technologies should be used to develop medium- to high-throughput screening models. In vivo testing of novel drugs should be performed in models mimicking relevant aspects of drug refractory epilepsy and/or epileptogenesis. To minimize the high attrition rate associated with drug development, which arises mainly from a failure to demonstrate sufficient clinical efficacy of new treatments, it is important to define integrated strategies for preclinical screening and experimental trial design. An important tool will be the discovery and implementation of relevant biomarkers that will facilitate a continuum of proof-of-concept approaches during early clinical testing to rapidly confirm or reject preclinical findings, and thereby lower the risk of the overall development effort. In this review, we overview some of the issues related to these topics and provide examples of new approaches that we hope will be more successful than those used in the past.

Seletracetam is a pyrrolidone derivative with a one-log-unit higher affinity for the synaptic vesicle protein 2A (SV2A) than levetiracetam (Keppra ® ). This study explored its anticonvulsant properties in animal models of epilepsy. Seletracetam reduced both the amplitude and repetitive firing of population spikes induced by a high K + /low Ca 2+ concentration fluid (HKLCF) in rat hippocampal slices. The reduction of HKLCF-induced increases in population spike amplitude was particularly pronounced, and occurred at ~ 10 times lower seletracetam concentrations than previously observed for levetiracetam. These in vitro data suggest that desynchronisation of epileptiform activity may contribute significantly to the antiepileptic properties of seletracetam. Seletracetam also showed a potent anti-seizure activity in animal models mimicking partial-onset (kindled animals) and generalized epilepsy (audiogenic seizure susceptible mice and genetic absence epilepsy rats from Strasbourg (GAERS)). In amygdala-kindled rats, seletracetam increased the generalized seizure threshold current and decreased the duration of the after-discharge and the seizure severity observed at the after-discharge threshold current, and generally had a much more potent effect than previously observed for levetiracetam. Seletracetam showed no psychomimetic effects and a very high central nervous system (CNS) tolerability in both kindled and GAERS rats, markedly superior to that of levetiracetam and other antiepileptic drugs. These results suggest that seletracetam may represent an effective and very well tolerated broad-spectrum agent for the symptomatic treatment of epilepsy.

Epilepsy, the most common chronic neurological pathology, is symptomatically treated by present antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) in about two-thirds of the cases. Unfortunately, this proportion has not been significantly reduced despite the introduction of several new-generation AEDs.This review challenges the utility of the paradigm of the excitation-inhibition imbalance for AED discovery and review mechanisms, presumed to be involved in drug-resistant epilepsy, with the purpose of discussing their relevance as targets for future AED discovery.Considering epilepsy as a mere imbalance between excitation and inhibition seems incapable of providing any proper basis for enabling future AED discovery to combat drug-resistant epilepsy as it oversimplifies a complex pathology, yet insufficiently understood. Two current hypotheses on the mechanisms of drug resistance in epilepsy highlight the roles of increased activity of blood-brain barrier multidrug transporter proteins and of alterations in the drug targets rendering them drug-insensitive. Both mechanisms are relevant but seem insufficient to account for the complexity of brain changes involved in drug-resistant epilepsy. Recent studies of drug-resistant epilepsy have revealed the involvement of inflammation processes, functional glia changes and altered intercellular communication related to gap junctions. This provides further, albeit not exhaustive, examples of targets to consider for future AED discovery. A successful strategy aimed at overcoming resistance to AEDs necessitates an integrated vision encompassing the basic features of intractable epilepsies.

Levetiracetam ( Keppra ® ) is a new generation antiepileptic drug characterized by a unique profile of activity in experimental models of epilepsy. It also has a distinct binding site in the brain, i.e. the synaptic vesicle protein type 2 (SV2A). Levetiracetam has been reported to have antiepileptogenic and disease-modifying properties. In the present study the effects of chronic treatment with levetiracetam were assessed in rats that sustained pilocarpine-induced status epilepticus (SE). Hippocampal field potentials were recorded in vivo in anesthetized animals after 3-day washout period that followed 21-day treatment with different doses of levetiracetam (50, 150 or 300 mg/kg / day) administered via ALZET ® osmotic mini-pumps. Vehicle treated rats together with naive animals (not subjected to SE) were used as control groups. Chronic treatment with levetiracetam yielded clinically relevant plasma concentrations throughout the experiment with complete washout of the drug 3 days after treatment cessation. At this point in time post-SE rats chronically treated with vehicle developed clear signs of hippocampal hyperexcitability, i.e. increased amplitude of population spike (PS) recorded in the dentate gyrus and reduced paired-pulse inhibition in the CA1 area. Levetiracetam treatment dose-dependently counteracted these long-term effects of pilocarpine-induced SE. Furthermore, at the dose of 300 mg/kg / day levetiracetam restored these parameters back to control level. The present results indicate that chronic treatment with levetiracetam completely inhibits the development of hippocampal hyperexcitability following pilocarpine-induced SE.

Background and purpose: Screening of 12 000 compounds for binding affinity to the synaptic vesicle protein 2A (SV2A), identified a high-affinity pyrrolidone derivative, brivaracetam (ucb 34714). This study examined its pharmacological profile in various in vitro and in vivo models of seizures and epilepsy, to evaluate its potential as a new antiepileptic drug.

The in vivo anticonvulsant effects and in vitro metabotropic glutamate receptor selectivity of (S)-4-carboxy-3-hydroxy-phenylglycine [(S)-4C3HPG] were examined. Intracerebroventricular injection of (S)-4C3HPG dose-dependently antagonized audiogenic-induced clonic and tonic convulsions in DBA/2 mice with ED50 values of 76 and 110-nmol per mouse, respectively. (S)-4C3HPG dose-dependently inhibited the spontaneously evoked epileptic spikes in a cingulate cortex-corpus callosum slice preparation. (S)-4C3HPG displaced the binding of [3H]glutamate in membranes prepared from baby hamster kidney (BHK) cells expressing the metabotropic glutamate receptor mGluR1a with an EC50 of 5 +/- 1 microM. (S)-4C3HPG dose-dependently antagonized glutamate-stimulated phosphoinositide hydrolysis in BHK cells expressing mGluR1a with an IC50 of 15 +/- 3 microM. (S)-4C3HPG was, however, an agonist at mGluR2 with an EC50 of 21 +/- 4 microM for inhibition of forskolin-stimulated cyclic AMP formation in BHK cells expressing the mGluR2. (S)-4C3HPG had no effects at mGluR4a. These data suggest that the anticonvulsant action of (S)-4C3HPG is mediated by combined antagonism of mGluR1a and agonism of mGluR2. These results suggest the importance of mGluR1a and/or mGluR2 in the control of epileptic activity.

SummaryObjective Rapid distribution to the brain is a prerequisite for antiepileptic drugs used for treatment of acute seizures. The preclinical studies described here investigated the high-affinity synaptic vesicle glycoprotein 2A (SV2A) antiepileptic drug brivara-cetam (BRV) for its rate of brain penetration and its onset of action. BRV was compared with levetiracetam (LEV). Methods In vitro permeation studies were performed using Caco-2 cells. Plasma and brain levels were measured over time after single oral dosing to audiogenic mice and were correlated with anticonvulsant activity. Tissue distribution was investigated after single dosing to rat (BRV and LEV) and dog (LEV only). Positron emission tomography (PET) displacement studies were performed in rhesus monkeys using the SV2A PET tracer [11C]UCB-J. The time course of PET tracer displacement was measured following single intravenous (IV) dosing with LEV or BRV. Rodent distribution data and physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling were used to compute blood–brain barrier permeability (permeability surface area product, PS) values and then predict brain kinetics in man. Results In rodents, BRV consistently showed a faster entry into the brain than LEV; this correlated with a faster onset of action against seizures in audiogenic susceptible mice. The higher permeability of BRV was also demonstrated in human cells in vitro. PBPK modeling predicted that, following IV dosing to human subjects, BRV might distribute to the brain within a few minutes compared with approximately 1 h for LEV (PS of 0.315 and 0.015 ml/min/g for BRV and LEV, respectively). These data were supported by a nonhuman primate PET study showing faster SV2A occupancy by BRV compared with LEV. Significance These preclinical data demonstrate that BRV has rapid brain entry and fast brain SV2A occupancy, consistent with the fast onset of action in the audiogenic seizure mice assay. The potential benefit of BRV for treatment of acute seizures remains to be confirmed in clinical studies.

Since electrophysiological correlates of l -dopa-induced dyskinesia (LID) are almost unknown, changes of striatal dopamine (DA) transmission and electrophysiological activity of the substantia nigra pars reticulata (SNr) were recorded before and after acute l -dopa administration in sham-operated and 6-hydroxydopamine (6-OHDA)-lesioned rats that were previously treated with vehicle or l -dopa for 10 days. Abnormal involuntary movements occurred only in the l -dopa-primed 6-OHDA-lesioned rats that showed after acute l -dopa administration a decrease in firing rate, the highest local field potential power in the theta/alpha band, a consequent oscillatory activity in the same frequency band at the single neuron level and an excessive increase in striatal DA release associated with the lowest level of DA metabolism. These results suggest that increased synchronised afferent activity may drive SNr oscillations in the same frequency band and is associated with abnormal involuntary movements, further suggesting the potential use of desynchronising drugs for managing LID in Parkinson's disease.

The cation-Cl − co-transport-blocking loop diuretics have clinically known anticonvulsant activity, though they can also induce seizures. We explored the effects of ethacrynic acid (ETA), furosemide (FUR) and bumetanide (BUM), prototypical blockers of cation-Cl − co-transport, on the epileptiform field potentials induced in CA3 area of hippocampal slices from 5-weeks-old rats by a high K + –low Ca 2+ perfusion fluid. That milieu induces frequent spontaneous field bursts, making single fimbrial stimuli to evoke several repetitive population spikes, of increased amplitude. ETA (0.25–1mM) concentration-dependently reduced spontaneous field bursting, up to terminating it. FUR, 5mM also inhibited spontaneous field bursting, while BUM (12.5–100μM) only presented an inconsistent tendency. Both ETA and FUR showed a less marked ability to depress the evoked responses, but ∼mM concentrations significantly reduced the number of repetitive population spikes and their amplitude. BUM only modestly reduced population spike amplitude, without concentration-dependence. This study shows that K + –Cl − co-transport-blocking diuretics ETA and FUR inhibit high K + -induced epileptiform activity in hippocampal slices from (nearly) adult rats, while the Na + –K + –2Cl − co-transport-preferring diuretic BUM had only negligible activity. These results support that neuronal K + –Cl − co-transport-blockade provides antiepileptic effects.

The persistent Na+ current (INaP) has been proposed as the putative target of the anti-absence antiepileptic drugs. Accordingly, the effect of reference anti-absence drugs ethosuximide (ESM) and valproate (VPA), and of the new antiepileptic drug levetiracetam (LEV), on INaP have been tested in CA1 hippocampal neurons and compared to the classic anticonvulsant phenytoin (PHT) and the neuroprotective agent riluzole (RIL). Whole-cell patch-clamp recordings of the slowly inactivating current, fully characterized as INaP, were performed with a standard voltage-step protocol on thin hippocampal slices prepared from rat brain. Both PHT (100 microM) and RIL (10 microM) strongly depressed INaP, whereas ESM (1 mM) induced a slight decrease of INaP and VPA (1 mM) had no effect. Likewise, 60-min perfusion with relevant concentrations of LEV (10, 32 or 100 microM) did not modify INaP. In conclusion, these data question the impact of INaP depression as an anti-absence mechanism, and also disclaim the involvement of INaP in the antiepileptic mechanism of LEV.

Levetiracetam (LEV) (Keppra; UCB Pharma, Brussels, Belgium) has recently been reported to have antidyskinetic activity against levodopa (l-DOPA)-induced dyskinesia in the 1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine (MPTP)-lesioned marmoset and macaque models of Parkinson's disease. Amantadine is frequently used as adjunctive therapy for l-DOPA-induced dyskinesia, but adverse effects limit its clinical utility. The current study was designed to investigate whether LEV can potentiate the antidyskinetic action of amantadine. The antiparkinsonian and antidyskinetic effects of LEV (13 and 60 mg/kg) and amantadine (0.01, 0.03, 0.1, and 0.3 mg/kg), administered alone and in combination, were assessed in the MPTP-lesioned marmoset model of l-DOPA-induced dyskinesia ( n = 12). LEV (60 mg/kg) and amantadine (0.3 mg/kg) administered alone significantly reduced l-DOPA-induced dyskinesia without compromising the antiparkinsonian action of l-DOPA. Lower doses were without any significant effects. The combination of LEV (60 mg/kg) and amantadine (0.01, 0.03, 0.1, and 0.3 mg/kg) significantly decreased dyskinesia severity, without compromising the antiparkinsonian action of l-DOPA, more efficaciously than LEV or amantadine monotherapy. These results support the concept that normalization of different pathophysiological mechanisms (i.e., altered synchronization between neurons and enhanced N -methyl-d-aspartate transmission) has a greater efficacy. Combined LEV/amantadine therapy might be useful as an adjunct to l-DOPA to treat dyskinetic side effects and to expand the population of Parkinson's disease patients who benefit from treatment with amantadine alone.

Gene expression profiling by microarrays is a powerful tool for identification of genes that may encode key proteins involved in molecular mechanisms underlying epileptogenesis. Using the Affymetrix oligonucleotide microarray, we have surveyed the expression levels of more than 26,000 genes and expressed sequence tags (ESTs) in the amygdala-kindling model of temporal lobe epilepsy. Furthermore, the effect of the antiepileptic drug levetiracetam (LEV) on kindling-induced alterations of gene expression was studied. Treatment of rats with LEV during kindling acquisition significantly suppressed kindling development. For gene expression profiling, six groups of rats were included in the present study: (i) and (ii) sham-operated rats treated with saline or LEV; (iii) and (iv) electrode-implanted but non-kindled rats treated with saline or LEV; (v) and (vi) kindled rats treated with saline or LEV. Treatment was terminated after 11 or 12 daily amygdala stimulations, when all vehicle-treated rats had reached kindling criterion, i.e. a stage 5 seizure. Twenty-four hours later, the ipsilateral temporal lobe was dissected for mRNA preparation. Six temporal lobe preparations from each group were analysed for differential gene expression. In control (non-kindled) rats, LEV treatment was devoid of any significant effect on gene expression. In saline-treated kindled rats, a large number of genes were observed to display mRNA expression alterations compared with non-kindled rats. LEV treatment induced marked effects on gene expression from kindled rats. Previously described epilepsy-related genes, such as neuropeptide Y (NPY), thyrotropin-releasing hormone (TRH) and glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) were confirmed to be up-regulated by kindling and partially normalized by LEV treatment. Real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction confirmed NPY, TRH and GFAP expression data from chip experiments. Furthermore, a number of novel genes were identified from the gene chip experiments. A subgroup of these genes demonstrated correlation between expression changes and kindled phenotype measurements. In summary, this study identified many genes with potentially important roles in epileptogenesis and highlighted several important issues in using the gene chip technology for the study of animal models of CNS disorders.

Levetiracetam (ucb L059; Keppra) is a novel antiepileptic drug. Its effects on action potential generation and voltage-operated potassium currents were studied in acutely isolated hippocampal CA1 neurones from rat and guinea pig, using the patch-clamp technique in the whole-cell configuration. (i) Levetiracetam reduced repetitive action potential generation and affected the single action potential. Levetiracetam, 100 microM, decreased the total number of action potentials and reduced the total depolarisation area of repetitive action potentials by 21%. Furthermore, levetiracetam increased the duration of the first action potential slightly, prolonged that of the second action potential by 13% and decreased the slope of rise by 23%. (ii) Levetiracetam decreased the voltage-operated potassium current. Without effect on sodium and A-type potassium currents, levetiracetam, 100 microM, reduced the delayed rectifier current by 26%. The concentration of half-maximal block was 47 microM for guinea pig and 6 microM for rat neurones. Thus, the reduction of repetitive action potential generation by levetiracetam can be attributed, unexpectedly, to a moderate reduction of the delayed rectifier potassium current, as supported by a simulation of action potential generation. This suggests that a reduction of potassium currents may contribute to the antiepileptic effect(s) of levetiracetam.

Long-term dopamine replacement therapy of Parkinson's disease leads to the occurrence of dyskinesias. Altered firing patterns of neurons of the internal globus pallidus, involving a pathological synchronization/desynchronization process, may contribute significantly to the genesis of dyskinesia. Levetiracetam, an antiepileptic drug that counteracts neuronal (hyper)synchronization in animal models of epilepsy, was assessed in the MPTP-lesioned marmoset model of Parkinson's disease, after coadministration with (1) levodopa (L-dopa) or (2) ropinirole/L-dopa combination. Oral administration of levetiracetam (13-60 mg/kg) in combination with either L-dopa (12 mg/kg) alone or L-dopa (8 mg/kg)/ropinirole (1.25 mg/kg) treatments was associated with significantly less dyskinesia, in comparison to L-dopa monotherapy during the first hour after administration. Thus, new nondopaminergic treatment strategies targeting normalization of abnormal firing patterns in basal ganglia structures may prove useful as an adjunct to reduce dyskinesia induced by dopamine replacement therapy without affecting its antiparkinsonian action.

Presynaptic H3 receptors exert negative control on brain histamine synthesis and release and may thereby play a key role in the control of the sleep/wake cycle. This suggests that pharmacological stimulation by H3 receptor agonists may potentially decrease wakefulness and induce sleep. This study reports the effect of a potent and selective H3 agonist, immepip, on EEG assessed sleep/wake phases in Sprague–Dawley rats at doses that significantly modulate brain histamine release. Immepip injected intraperitoneally (i.p.) at 5 or 10 mg kg −1 induced a sustained decrease in cortical histamine efflux as measured by in vivo microdialysis. In a separate experiment, rats were prepared for EEG/EMG recording and evaluated during the dark phase of their light/dark cycle. The results showed that the same i.p. doses of 5 and 10 mg kg −1 of immepip was devoid of any significant impact on the sleep/wake phases (active awake, drowsiness and slow wave sleep), except for a slight, albeit significant, decrease in sleep onset latency. These results reveal that a marked H3 receptor agonist-mediated reduction in cortical histamine release is not corroborated by a significant sleep promoting effect and therefore question the hypnotic potential of H3 agonists.

The effect of levetiracetam on neuronal hypersynchrony and hyperexcitability was examined using simultaneous extra- and intracellular recordings in rat brain slices perfused with a high K + /low Ca 2+ (HKLC) fluid. These findings were compared to results obtained with carbamazepine, valproate and clonaze-pam. The HKLC milieu induces in hippocampal CA3 area, spontaneous interictal bursts and epileptiform responses. Levetiracetam decreased the number of population spikes per extracellular response but did not affect the number of action potentials per intracellular burst. This contrasts the effects of the reference antiepileptic drugs, which depressed both the extracellular and the intracellular bursts. These results indicate that levetiracetam is distinct from classical antiepileptic drugs by a relatively selective effect on collective neuronal responses, rather than on single neuron activity and suggests a potentially novel desynchronizing effect that probably contributes to its antiepileptic action.

The purpose of this study was to assess, in rats, the antinociceptive effects of levetiracetam (i.p.), a novel antiepileptic drug, in acute pain tests and in two models of human neuropathic pain. Levetiracetam and carbamazepine contrasted morphine by an absence of effect in the tail flick and hot plate tests. In normal rats, carbamazepine failed to modify the vocalisation thresholds to paw pressure whereas levetiracetam slightly increased this threshold only at the highest dose (540 mg/kg) for 30 min. In the sciatic nerve with chronic constriction injury model, the highest dose of levetiracetam (540 mg/kg) and carbamazepine (30 mg/kg) reversed the hyperalgesia. In streptozocin-induced diabetic rats, levetiracetam dose-dependently increased the vocalization threshold from 17 to 120 mg/kg reaching a similar effect as 10 mg/kg of carbamazepine. These results indicate that levetiracetam induces an antihyperalgesic effect in two models of human neuropathic pain, suggesting a therapeutic potential in neuropathic pain patients.

The novel antiepileptic drug levetiracetam has been shown to reverse anxiogenic effects of benzodiazepine withdrawal in mice tested in an elevated plus-maze without altering the behaviour of normal mice in this model. This could suggest that the effect of levetiracetam is dependent upon the level of stress/anxiety of the animals. Levetiracetam was therefore further examined in another widely used animal model of anxiety, the Vogel conflict test. In the first experiment, water-deprived rats were submitted to a free drinking period (habituation) in a chamber equipped with a bottle of water. Twenty-four hours later, animals were returned to the same chamber but the licks to the water bottle were then punished with a foot shock (0.5 mA, 90 ms). In the second experiment, the procedure was modified by administering a foot shock at the end of the habituation period in order to induce a state of stress/anxiety (conditioned fear/ anticipatory anxiety) for subsequent testing. Levetiracetam (17 and 54 mg/kg) and chlordiazepoxide (5 mg/kg) were administered via the intraperitoneal route. The results indicated that in the first experiment only chlordiazepoxide showed a statistically significant anxiolytic effect. In contrast, in the second experiment, where the shock was given at the end of the habituation period, levetiracetam (54 mg/kg) revealed significant anxiolytic activity similar to chlordiazepoxide. This suggests that levetiracetam may have potential anxiolytic effects and may provide therapeutic benefits to individual with anxiety spectrum disorders.

This study compared levetiracetam (Keppra) with reference antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) in the rat pilocarpine model of temporal lobe epilepsy. Electroencephalogram (EEG) recordings showed that i.p. administration of valproate (300 mg/kg), phenobarbital (5 mg/kg) and clonazepam (0.5 mg/kg) all significantly delayed the appearance of the first epileptic spike discharge in hippocampus as well as synchronous epileptiform activity in hippocampus and cortex. In contrast, i.p. administration of levetiracetam (17 mg/kg) only significantly delayed the appearance of the latter. This was corroborated by findings showing that i.p. administration of levetiracetam (17 mg/kg) significantly opposed pilocarpine-induced increases in the amplitude of the orthodromic population spike in the hippocampal CA3 area of urethane-anaesthetised rats, while valproate (200 mg/kg), phenobarbital (10 mg/kg) and clonazepam (1 mg/kg) had no effect. Pre-treatment i.p. with phenobarbital (10 mg/kg) and clonazepam (0.5 mg/kg) significantly reversed seizure-induced changes in aspartate and GABA concentrations while valproate (300 mg/kg) significantly reduced aspartate concentrations further. In contrast, levetiracetam (34 mg/kg) significantly counteracted all seizure-induced alterations in amino acid concentrations. Midazolam induced significant seizure protection after microinjection into substantia nigra pars reticulata (SNR, 50 nmol), nucleus accumbens (NA, 25 nmol) and caudate putamen (CP, 25 nmol), whereas phenytoin (50 nmol) only showed significant seizure protection after injection into the latter area. Levetiracetam differed by significant seizure protection after injection into SNR (1,000 nmol) and NA (3,000 nmol). These results suggest that levetiracetam is distinct from other AEDs by its ability to selectively suppress synchronisation of neuronal spike and burst firing in hippocampus.

This study characterized the electrophysiological and neuropathological changes in rat brains caused by pilocarpine (PILO)-induced status epilepticus (SE) of different duration. SE induced by PILO (375 mg/kg, i.p. adm.) were terminated with a bolus dose of diazepam (10 mg/kg, i.v. adm.) injected 7.5, 15, 30, 60 or 120 min after initiation of the secondary generalization of the SE. Three weeks later, the gain in body weight was significantly reduced in the rats exposed to PILO-induced SE lasting 30 min or more, when compared to controls. Spontaneous seizures were not detected in rats with PILO-induced SE of 7.5 min duration whereas 50 and 25% of the rats exposed to seizure durations of 30 and 120 min expressed motor seizures. Significant alterations reflecting hyperexcitability (increased number of population spikes (PSs)) and reduced paired-pulse inhibition were observed in recordings of hippocampal field potentials from rats with PILO-induced SE of at least 30 min duration. This was substantiated by brain lesions (necrosis in olfactory cortex, hippocampus, amygdala and thalamus) in all rats manifesting a SE of at least 30 min duration. Thus, the results of the present study demonstrate that rats exposed to PILO-induced SE of at least 30 min duration manifest an epileptogenic process, revealed 3 weeks later by several parameters. Among these, hippocampal field potentials appear to represent the most sensitive marker, potentially useful for pharmacological evaluation of drugs with putative antiepileptogenic properties.

1. In this study in vitro and in vivo approaches were combined in order to investigate if the anti-epileptic mechanism(s) of action of levetiracetam (LEV; Keppra) may involve modulation of inhibitory neurotransmission. 2. GABA- and glycine-gated currents were studied in vitro using whole-cell patch-clamp techniques applied on cultured cerebellar granule, hippocampal and spinal neurons. Protection against clonic convulsions was assessed in vivo in sound-susceptible mice. The effect of LEV was compared with reference anti-epileptic drugs (AEDs): carbamazepine, phenytoin, valproate, clonazepam, phenobarbital and ethosuximide. 3. LEV contrasted the reference AEDs by an absence of any direct effect on glycine-gated currents. At high concentrations, beyond therapeutic relevance, it induced a small reduction in the peak amplitude and a prolongation of the decay phase of GABA-gated currents. A similar action on GABA-elicited currents was observed with the reference AEDs, except ethosuximide. 4. These minor direct effects contrasted with a potent ability of LEV (EC(50)=1 - 10 microM) to reverse the inhibitory effects of the negative allosteric modulators zinc and beta-carbolines on both GABA(A) and glycine receptor-mediated responses. 5. Clonazepam, phenobarbital and valproate showed a similar ability to reverse the inhibition of beta-carbolines on GABA-gated currents. Blockade of zinc inhibition of GABA responses was observed with clonazepam and ethosuximide. Phenytoin was the only AED together with LEV that inhibited the antagonism of zinc on glycine-gated currents and only clonazepam and phenobarbital inhibited the action of DMCM. 6. LEV (17 mg kg(-1)) produced a potent suppression of sound-induced clonic convulsions in mice. This protective effect was significantly abolished by co-administration of the beta-carboline FG 7142, from a dose of 5 mg kg(-1). In contrast, the benzodiazepine receptor antagonist flumazenil (up to 10 mg kg(-1)) was without any effect on the protection afforded by LEV. 7. The results of the present study suggest that a novel ability to oppose the action of negative modulators on the two main inhibitory ionotropic receptors may be of relevance for the anti-epileptic mechanism(s) of action of LEV.

A major goal of contemporary epilepsy research is the identification of therapies to prevent the development of recurrent seizures in individuals at risk, including those with brain injuries, infections, or neoplasms; status epilepticus; cortical dysplasias; or genetic epilepsy susceptibility. In this review we consider the evidence largely from preclinical models for the antiepileptogenic activity of a diverse range of potential therapies, including some marketed antiseizure drugs, as well as agents that act by immune and inflammatory mechanisms; reduction of oxidative stress; activation of the mammalian target of rapamycin or peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors γ pathways; effects on factors related to thrombolysis, hematopoesis, and angiogenesis; inhibition of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A reducatase; brain-derived neurotrophic factor signaling; and blockade of α2 adrenergic and cannabinoid receptors. Antiepileptogenesis refers to a therapy of which the beneficial action is to reduce seizure frequency or severity outlasting the treatment period. To date, clinical trials have failed to demonstrate that antiseizure drugs have such disease-modifying activity. However, studies in animal models with levetiracetam and ethosuximide are encouraging, and clinical trials with these agents are warranted. Other promising strategies are inhibition of interleukin 1β signaling by drugs such as VX-765; modulation of sphingosine 1-phosphate signaling by drugs such as fingolimod; activation of the mammalian target of rapamycin by drugs such as rapamycin; the hormone erythropoietin; and, paradoxically, drugs such as the α2 adrenergic receptor antagonist atipamezole and the CB1 cannabinoid antagonist SR141716A (rimonabant) with proexcitatory activity. These approaches could lead to a new paradigm in epilepsy drug therapy where treatment for a limited period prevents the occurrence of spontaneous seizures, thus avoiding lifelong commitment to symptomatic treatment.

Levetiracetam is a new antiepileptic drug (AED) devoid of anticonvulsant activity in the two classic screening models for AEDs, the maximal electroshock and pentylenetetrazol seizure tests in both mice and rats. This contrasts a potent seizure suppression in genetic and kindled mice and rats and against chemoconvulsants inducing partial seizures in rats. The highly selective action in "epileptic" animals distinguishes levetiracetam from classic and other new AEDs that have nearly equipotent effects in normal and "epileptic" animals. Levetiracetam induces minor behavioral alterations in normal and in kindled mice and rats. This results in an unusually high safety margin in animal models reflecting both partial and primary generalized epilepsy. Furthermore, experiments in the kindling model suggest that levetiracetam may possess antiepileptogenic properties due to a potent ability to prevent the development of kindling in mice and rats at doses devoid of adverse effects. Electrophysiologic recordings from different experimental models suggest that levetiracetam exerts a selective action against abnormal patterns of neuronal activity, which probably explains its selective protection in epileptic animals and its unique tolerability. This effect appears to derive from one or more novel mechanisms of action that do not involve a conventional interaction with traditional drug targets implicated in the modulation of inhibitory and excitatory neurotransmission. Instead, ligand-binding assays have disclosed a brain-specific binding site for levetiracetam. These studies reveal a unique preclinical profile of levetiracetam, distinct from that of all known AEDs, suggesting that levetiracetam could represent the first agent in a new class of AEDs.

The effect of the new antiepileptic drug levetiracetam (LEV; KEPPRA) on the neuronal high-voltage-activated (HVA) Ca(2+) current was investigated on pyramidal neurones, visually identified in the CA1 area of rat hippocampal slices. Nystatin-perforated patch clamp recordings were made under experimental conditions designed to study HVA Ca(2+) currents. The HVA current, activated by steadily increasing voltage-ramps, was reversibly eliminated by Cd(2+) and depressed by either nimodipine, or omega-Conotoxin GVIA. After 30 min perfusion of the slices with LEV 32 microM, the current decayed to 55+/-9% (mean+/-SEM; n=9) of the initial value, which is significantly (P0.05, two-tailed t-test) lower than the rundown to 84+/-10% in a control group (n=10) of neurones. The limited, but significant depression of the neuronal HVA Ca(2+) current, produced by LEV at a clinically relevant concentration, might contribute to the antiepileptic action of the drug.

A new diaryl-methylene piperidine derivative, 2, displayed an atypical antipsychotic profile both in vitro and in vivo. The main pharmacological characteristics of this compound appears to reside in a more potent antagonism of the 5-HT2 serotonergic receptor than of the D2 dopaminergic receptor. This confirms that molecules displaying a D2/5-HT2 binding ratio1 possess clozapine-like antipsychotic activity.

Various agents have been used for the treatment of epilepsy. Standard antiepileptics (AEDs) have been available in the United States for many years and although they continue to play an important role in the treatment of epilepsy, these agents have limitations. Many have a lack of efficacy, side effects or toxicities, or potentially cause interactions with other agents. While the mechanism of action for AEDs is still not entirely clear, most experts agree that it is related to ion channels and ultimately to the balance between neural inhibition and excitation. The ultimate goal of all AEDs is to either reduce excitation or promote inhibition. There is an opportunity for newer AEDs to be developed and marketed; these newer agents have the promise of fewer adverse effects and greater efficacy. A challenge for the new AEDs is to actually prevent the initiation of epileptiform activity and prophylactically suppress seizure induction.

The effect of the new antiepileptic drug (AED) levetiracetam (LEV, Keppra) on cognitive function was studied in normal and amygdala-kindled rats by using the Morris water maze test. In addition, we investigated the effect of LEV on long-term potentiation (LTP) in rat hippocampal slices. Sodium valproate (VPA) was used as comparator in all studies. Clonazepam (CZP) and carbamazepine (CBZ) were used in normal rats. The results indicated that doses of LEV known to suppress motor seizures did not alter cognitive performance. In contrast, similar doses of the classic AEDs all decreased learning performance of the rats. Likewise, VPA did alter LTP but LEV was inactive. Amygdala-kindled rats were more sensitive than normal rats to the effects of VPA. These results suggest that LEV may be devoid of negative impact on cognition in epileptic patients.

A working group was created to address clinical "gaps to care" as well as opportunities for development of new treatment approaches for epilepsy. The working group primarily comprised clinicians, trialists, and pharmacologists. The group identified a need for better animal models for both efficacy and tolerability, and noted that animal models for potential disease-modifying or antiepileptogenic effect should mirror conditions in human trials. For antiseizure drugs (ASDs), current animal models have not been validated with respect to their relationship to efficacy in common epilepsy syndromes. The group performed an "expert opinion" survey of perceived efficacy of the available ASDs, and identified a specific unmet need for ASDs to treat tonic-atonic and myoclonic seizures. No correlation has as yet been demonstrated between animal models of tolerability and adverse effects (AEs), versus tolerability in humans. There is a clear opportunity for improved therapies in relation to dose-related AEs. The group identified common and rare epilepsy syndromes that could represent opportunities for clinical trials. They identified opportunities for antiepileptogenic (AEG) therapies in both adults and children, acknowledging that the presence of a biomarker would substantially improve the chances of a successful trial. However, the group acknowledged that disease-modifying therapies (given after the first seizure or after the development of epilepsy) would be easier to study than AEG therapies.

Several preclinical proof-of-concept studies have provided evidence for positive treatment effects on epileptogenesis. However, none of these hypothetical treatments has advanced to the clinic. The experience in other fields of neurology such as stroke, Alzheimer's disease, or amyotrophic lateral sclerosis has indicated several problems in the design of preclinical studies, which likely contribute to failures in translating the positive preclinical data to the clinic. The Working Group on "Issues related to development of antiepileptogenic therapies" of the International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE) and the American Epilepsy Society (AES) has considered the possible problems that arise when moving from proof-of-concept antiepileptogenesis (AEG) studies to preclinical AEG trials, and eventually to clinical AEG trials. This article summarizes the discussions and provides recommendations on how to design a preclinical AEG monotherapy trial in adult animals. We specifically address study design, animal and model selection, number of studies needed, issues related to administration of the treatment, outcome measures, statistics, and reporting. In addition, we give recommendations for future actions to advance the preclinical AEG testing.

Levetiracetam is a multiple action drug that primarily acts through an interaction with the synaptic vesicle protein 2A. Levetiracetam is the first drug of its kind to be approved for the treatment of epilepsy and is now the most prescribed among the newer antiepileptic drugs. The discovery process identifying levetiracetam's antiepileptic potential was unique because it challenged several dogmas of antiepileptic drug discovery, and thereby encountered skepticism from the epilepsy community. This was contrasted by a very successful development programme leading to rapid regulatory approval by the FDA. The history of levetiracetam proves that a small core group of committed scientists and physicians, who dare to challenge the conventional scientific doctrine, can be successful in bringing to market a truly novel therapy for epilepsy patients.

Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (RTMS) has been reported to induce epileptic seizures in normal control and in epileptic patients. Therefore we characterized the effect of acute or chronic stimulations with RTMS on the induction of pentylenetetrazole (PTZ)-induced clonic seizures in the rat. Male Wistar rats were stimulated with a 13-cm coil with a stimulus frequency of 50 Hz. The motor threshold (Tm) was determined by a single transcranial stimulus. Acute stimulation was performed with a stimulus intensity of 0.9 x Tm and 1.5 x Tm using a duration of the train of stimuli of five seconds. Chronic stimulation was performed with a duration of the train of stimuli of one and five seconds using a stimulus intensity of 1.8 x Tm, every day for 30 days. Time to onset of PTZ-induced clonic seizure was determined after the acute stimulation or the last stimulation in chronic RTMS. In the groups of rats receiving acute RTMS (0.9 and 1.5 x Tm) no seizures developed. No differences were observed in time to onset of clonic seizures after PTZ injection compared to control rats. In the group of rats receiving chronic RTMS some rats showed facial contractions, chewing or head movements during or immediately after the stimulations. None of the rats developed tonic or clonic seizures in relation to RTMS. Time to onset of PTZ clonic seizures was reduced in both groups receiving RTMS with a stimulus duration of one (P < 0.01) and five (P < 0.05) seconds compared to control rats. The results from this study suggest that acute suprathreshold stimulation with a stimulus frequency of 50 Hz does not affect the induction of clonic PTZ seizures, whereas chronic (daily) stimulations have a facilitatory effect. This indicates that chronic stimulation with RTMS may induce a kindling process in the rat. Chronic RTMS stimulation may therefore represent an interesting alternative non-invasively kindling model to chemical and electrical stimulations.