Search

Background: Acute liver failure (ALF) occurs as a rare, sudden, extensive loss of liver function in a previously healthy liver. In advanced cases, ALF may require liver transplantation (LT). Available prognostic parameters have limited accuracy to decide, which patient to consider for LT. The liver maximum function capacity test (LiMAx) can accurately determine liver function and was assessed as predictor of survival, along with coagulation parameters and liver stiffness in nonacetaminophen-induced ALF. Methods: Various liver function tests, including LiMAx measurements, coagulation factors, and transient elastography (TE), were analyzed retrospectively for associations with clinical outcome in 34 patients with ALF or acute hepatitis (AH). Data were compared between patients with spontaneous recovery (SR) and non-SR (3-month mortality/LT; NSR). Results: The analysis included 34 patients (22 ALF, 12 AH; 19 males, 15 females; age 36.7 ± 14.6 years) with drug-induced liver injury (DILI) (n = 12), autoimmune hepatitis (AIH; n = 13), AIH-DILI overlap (n = 1), viral (n = 9), or cryptogenic liver failure (n = 1). Thirty-one patients recovered spontaneously, 2 patients died, and 1 patient underwent LT. The LiMAx was 197.6 (±68.4) for SR versus 92.33 (±65.0) for NSR (p = 0.0157). Fibrinogen was significantly lower in patients with NSR than in SR patients (209.0 vs. 106.3; p = 0.02). Mean liver stiffness measured by TE was 39.3 for NSR and 17.3 for SR (p = 0.26). KCC was fulfilled in only 4 patients (3 SR, 1 NSR). LiMAx results correlated positively with serum fibrinogen and antithrombin III concentrations and correlated negatively with liver stiffness. No other analyzed factor could differentiate between SR and NSR. Conclusion: Decision-making in ALF remains challenging. LiMAx and fibrinogen might predict the prognosis in patients with nonacetaminophen-induced ALF and in combination could be feasible tools to decide if LT is necessary.

Background Acute liver failure (ALF) occurs as a rare, sudden, extensive loss of liver function in a previously healthy liver. In advanced cases, ALF may require liver transplantation (LT). Available prognostic parameters have limited accuracy to decide, which patient to consider for LT. The liver maximum function capacity test (LiMax) can accurately determine liver function and was assessed as predictor of survival, along with coagulation parameters and liver stiffness in non-acetaminophen-induced ALF. Methods Various liver function tests, including LiMAx measurements, coagulation factors, and transient elastography (TE) were analyzed retrospectively for associations with clinical outcome in 34 patients with ALF or acute hepatitis (AH). Data were compared between patients with spontaneous recovery (SR) and non-spontaneous recovery (3-month mortality/LT;NSR) Results The analysis included 34 patients (22 ALF, 12 AH; 19 male, 15 female; age 36.7±14.6y) with various causes of liver failure. Thirty-one patients recovered spontaneously, two patients died, and one patient underwent LT. The LiMax was 197.6 for SR vs. 92.33 for NSR (p = 0.0157). Fibrinogen was significantly lower in patients with NSR than in SR patients (209.0 vs. 106.3; p = 0.02). Mean liver stiffness measured by TE was 39.3 for NSR and 17.3 for SR (p = 0.26). KCC were fulfilled in only four patients (3 SR, 1 NSR). LiMAx results correlated positively with serum fibrinogen and antithrombin III concentrations and correlated negatively with liver stiffness. No other analyzed factor could differentiate between SR and NSR. Conclusion Decision-making in ALF remains challenging. LiMAx and fibrinogen might predict the prognosis in patients with non-acetaminophen-induced ALF and in combination could be feasible tools to decide if LT is necessary.

We integrated molecular data with available prognostic factors in patients undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT) for myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) or secondary acute myeloid leukemia (sAML) from MDS to evaluate their impact on prognosis. Three hundred four patients were sequenced for mutations in 54 genes. We used a Cox multivariate model and competing risk analysis with internal and cross validation to identify factors prognostic of overall survival (OS), cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR), and non-relapse mortality (NRM). In multivariate analysis, mutated NRAS, U2AF1, IDH2, and TP53 and/or a complex karyotype were significant prognostic markers for OS besides age above 60 years, remission status, IPSS-R cytogenetic risk, HCT-CI > 2 and female donor sex. Mutated NRAS, IDH1, EZH2, and TP53 and/or a complex karyotype were genetic aberrations with prognostic impact on CIR. No molecular markers were associated with the risk of NRM. The inclusion of molecular information results in better risk prediction models for OS and CIR when assessed by the Akaike information criterion. Internal cross validation confirmed the robustness of our comprehensive risk model. In summary, we propose to combine molecular, cytogenetic, and patient- and transplantation-associated risk factors into a comprehensive risk model to provide personalized predictions of outcome after alloHCT.