Search

Drug development for Alzheimer disease and other neurodegenerative dementias, including frontotemporal dementia, has experienced a long history of phase 2 and phase 3 clinical trials that failed to show efficacy of investigational drugs. Despite differences in clinical and behavioral characteristics, these disorders have shared pathologies and face common challenges in designing early-phase trials that are predictive of late-stage success. Here, we discuss exploratory clinical trials in neurodegenerative dementias. These are generally phase 1b or phase 2a trials that are designed to assess pharmacologic effects and rely on biomarker outcomes, with shorter treatment durations and fewer patients than traditional phase 2 studies. Exploratory trials can establish go/no-go decision points, support proof of concept and dose selection, and terminate drugs that fail to show target engagement with suitable exposure and acceptable safety profiles. Early failure saves valuable resources including opportunity costs. This is especially important for programs in academia and small biotechnology companies but may be applied to high-risk projects in large pharmaceutical companies to achieve proof of concept more rapidly at lower costs than traditional approaches. Exploratory studies in a staged clinical development program may provide promising data to warrant the substantial resources needed to advance compounds through late-stage development. To optimize the design and application of exploratory trials, the Alzheimer's Drug Discovery Foundation and the Association for Frontotemporal Degeneration convened an advisory panel to provide recommendations on outcome measures and statistical considerations for these types of studies and study designs that can improve efficiency in clinical development.

Background: Informative, readily accessible plasma biomarkers of pathology, neuroinflammation, and neurodegeneration in Alzheimer's disease (AD) could enhance targeted approaches to AD trial design and treatment. In post‐hoc analyses, we examined whether plasma biomarkers (Aβ1‐40, Aβ1‐42, total tau, p‐tau‐181, NfL, and GFAP) predicted 48‐week change in cognitive (ADAS‐Cog11), global function (CDR‐SB), and volumetric MRI (6 cortical regions and 2 whole brain measures) outcomes in T2 Protect AD, a phase‐2 placebo‐controlled RCT of troriluzole in mild‐to‐moderate AD (NCT03605667). Method: At least one baseline biomarker measurement was available for 319 of 350 trial participants, forming the analytic sample. No significant treatment effects were found in T2 Protect AD (Feldman 2021, JPAD 8(4):s46); thus, treatment arms were pooled for this analysis. Baseline levels of, and 48‐week changes in, plasma biomarkers were assessed for association with 48‐week change in outcomes using linear regression adjusted for relevant covariates. Combinations of baseline plasma biomarkers that best predicted 48‐week decline on the ADAS‐Cog11 and CDR‐SB were identified using LASSO regression. Statistical significance level was 5%; p‐values were Bonferroni corrected for multiple comparisons. Result: Participant characteristics are presented in Table 1. Higher baseline plasma NfL predicted greater 48‐week decline on ADAS‐Cog11 (p = 0.026) and CDR‐SB (p = 0.048; Fig. 1A). LASSO revealed that the combination of baseline plasma NfL, total tau, and Aβ42/40 ratio best predicted 48‐week decline on ADAS‐Cog11, whereas baseline NfL alone best predicted 48‐week decline on CDR‐SB. Regarding MRI outcomes, baseline NfL predicted increase in ventricular volume (p = 0.018; Fig 1A). Baseline NfL, GFAP, and p‐tau‐181 each predicted 48‐week decline in mid‐temporal cortical volume (all p<0.02; Fig.1B); LASSO results were similar. The only significant association between 48‐week biomarker change and clinical outcomes was between increased plasma NfL and worsening CDR‐SB. Conclusion: Elevated baseline plasma NfL predicted greater 48‐week decline on cognitive, global function, and MRI measures in a clinical trial of mild‐to‐moderate AD. Furthermore, greater increase in plasma NfL over time was associated with greater clinical decline. Plasma NfL is an easily accessible biomarker that may enhance AD clinical trial design and treatment strategies. Acknowledgement: Trial funding by Biohaven Pharmaceuticals; data and trial coordination by the Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study (ADCS). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The violent and peaceful behaviors of 115 children who had or had not witnessed domestic violence were measured in five types of simulated conflict. Witnesses did not differ from nonwitnesses in conflicts involving limited resources, jealousy over possessions, or intimidation; witnesses were significantly more violent in conflicts involving aggression and exclusion. The most violent responses were found among abusers' sons who had been excluded by peers. Keywords: children, peace, peer conflicts, spouse abuse, violence, child witnesses

Child witnesses' use of violent or peaceful strategies to resolve conflicts with peers were compared with strategies used by nonwitnesses. Stories depicting 5 types of peer conflicts were presented to each child, and the strategies used by the child to reach peaceful resolutions were scored. Findings include differences between witnesses and nonwitnesses, differences between genders, differences according to types of conflicts, and individual differences.

Introduction: The LipiDiDiet trial investigates the effects of the specific multinutrient combination Fortasyn Connect on cognition and related measures in prodromal Alzheimer's disease (AD). Based on previous results we hypothesized that benefits increase with long‐term intervention. Methods: In this randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled trial, 311 people with prodromal AD were recruited using the International Working Group‐1 criteria and assigned to active product (125 mL once‐a‐day drink) or an isocaloric, same tasting, placebo control drink. Main outcome was change in cognition (Neuropsychological Test Battery [NTB] 5‐item composite). Analyses were by modified intention‐to‐treat, excluding (ie, censoring) data collected after the start of open‐label active product and/or AD medication. Results: Of the 382 assessed for eligibility, 311 were randomized, of those 162 participants completed the 36‐month study, including 81 with 36‐month data eligible for efficacy analysis. Over 36 months, significant reductions in decline were observed for the NTB 5‐item composite (−60%; between‐group difference 0.212 [95% confidence interval: 0.044 to 0.380]; P = 0.014), Clinical Dementia Rating‐Sum of Boxes (−45%; P = 0.014), memory (−76%; P = 0.008), and brain atrophy measures; small to medium Cohen's d effect size (0.25–0.31) similar to established clinically relevant AD treatment. Discussion: This multinutrient intervention slowed decline on clinical and other measures related to cognition, function, brain atrophy, and disease progression. These results indicate that intervention benefits increased with long‐term use. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Recent clinical trials are considering inclusion of more than just apolipoprotein E (APOE) ε4 genotype as a way of reducing variability in analysis of outcomes. Methods: Case‐control data were used to compare the capacity of age, sex, and 58 Alzheimer's disease (AD)–associated single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) to predict AD status using several statistical models. Model performance was assessed with Brier scores and tenfold cross‐validation. Genotype and sex × age estimates from the best performing model were combined with age and intercept estimates from the general population to develop a personalized genetic risk score, termed age, and sex‐adjusted GenoRisk. Results: The elastic net model that included age, age x sex interaction, allelic APOE terms, and 29 additional SNPs performed the best. This model explained an additional 19% of the heritable risk compared to APOE genotype alone and achieved an area under the curve of 0.747. Discussion: GenoRisk could improve the risk assessment of individuals identified for prevention studies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]