Search

Your search keyword '"Hemon, D."' showing total 203 results
Start Over Author "Hemon, D."
203 results on '"Hemon, D."'

21. Proximity to overhead power lines and childhood leukaemia: an international pooled analysis

Author

Amoon, Aryana T., Crespi, Catherine M., Ahlbom, Anders, Bhatnagar, Megha, Bray, Isabelle, Bunch, Kathryn J., Clavel, Jacqueline, Feychting, Maria, Hemon, D, Johansen, Christoffer, Kreis, Christian, Malagoli, Carlotta, Marquant, Fabienne, Pederson, C, Raaschou-Nielsen, Ole, Röösli, Martin, Spycher, Ben D., Sudan, Madhuri, Swanson, John, Tittarelli, Andrea, Tuck, Deirdre M., Tynes, Tore, Vergara, Ximena, Vinceti, Marco, Wünsch-Filho, Victor, Kheifets, Leeka, Hémon, Denis, and Pedersen, Camilla

Subjects
Formerly Health & Social Sciences, Centre for Public Health and Wellbeing, power lines, childhood leukaemia, electro-magnetic fields, meta-analysis
Abstract

© 2018, Cancer Research UK. Background: Although studies have consistently found an association between childhood leukaemia risk and magnetic fields, the associations between childhood leukaemia and distance to overhead power lines have been inconsistent. We pooled data from multiple studies to assess the association with distance and evaluate whether it is due to magnetic fields or other factors associated with distance from lines. Methods: We present a pooled analysis combining individual-level data (29,049 cases and 68,231 controls) from 11 record-based studies. Results: There was no material association between childhood leukaemia and distance to nearest overhead power line of any voltage. Among children living < 50 m from 200 + kV power lines, the adjusted odds ratio for childhood leukaemia was 1.33 (95% CI: 0.92–1.93). The odds ratio was higher among children diagnosed before age 5 years. There was no association with calculated magnetic fields. Odds ratios remained unchanged with adjustment for potential confounders. Conclusions: In this first comprehensive pooled analysis of childhood leukaemia and distance to power lines, we found a small and imprecise risk for residences < 50 m of 200 + kV lines that was not explained by high magnetic fields. Reasons for the increased risk, found in this and many other studies, remains to be elucidated.

Published
2018

28. IARC monographs: 40 years of evaluating carcinogenic hazards to humans

Author

Pearce, N., Blair, A., Vineis, P., Ahrens, W., Andersen, A., Anto, J., Armstrong, B., Baccarelli, A., Beland, F., Berrington, A., Bertazzi, P., Birnbaum, L., Brownson, R., Bucher, J., Cantor, K., Cardis, E., Cherrie, J., Christiani, D., Cocco, P., Coggon, D., Comba, P., Demers, P., Dement, J., Douwes, J., Eisen, E., Engel, L., Fenske, R., Fleming, L., Fletcher, T., Fontham, E., Forastiere, F., Frentzel-Beyme, R., Fritschi, Lin, Gerin, M., Goldberg, M., Grandjean, P., Grimsrud, T., Gustavsson, P., Haines, A., Hartge, P., Hansen, J., Hauptmann, M., Heederik, D., Hemminki, K., Hemon, D., Hertz-Picciotto, I., Hoppin, J., Huff, J., Jarvholm, B., Kang, D., Karagas, M., Kjaerheim, K., Kjuus, H., Kogevinas, M., Kriebel, D., Kristensen, P., Kromhout, H., Laden, F., Lebailly, P., Lemasters, G., Lubin, J., Lynch, C., Lynge, E., Mannetje, A., McMichael, A., McLaughlin, J., Marrett, L., Martuzzi, M., Merchant, J., Merler, E., Merletti, F., Miller, A., Mirer, F., Monson, R., Nordby, K., Olshan, A., Parent, M., Perera, F., Perry, M., Pesatori, A., Pirastu, R., Porta, M., Pukkala, E., Rice, C., Richardson, D., Ritter, L., Ritz, B., Ronckers, C., Rushton, L., Rusiecki, J., Rusyn, I., Samet, J., Sandler, D., de Sanjose, S., Schernhammer, E., Costantini, A., Seixas, N., Shy, C., Siemiatycki, J., Silverman, D., Simonato, L., Smith, A., Smith, M., Spinelli, J., Spitz, M., Stallones, L., Stayner, L., Steenland, K., Stenzel, M., Stewart, B., Stewart, P., Symanski, E., Terracini, B., Tolbert, P., Vainio, H., Vena, J., Vermeulen, R., Victora, C., Ward, E., Weinberg, C., Weisenburger, D., Wesseling, C., Weiderpass, E., Zahm, S., Pearce, N., Blair, A., Vineis, P., Ahrens, W., Andersen, A., Anto, J., Armstrong, B., Baccarelli, A., Beland, F., Berrington, A., Bertazzi, P., Birnbaum, L., Brownson, R., Bucher, J., Cantor, K., Cardis, E., Cherrie, J., Christiani, D., Cocco, P., Coggon, D., Comba, P., Demers, P., Dement, J., Douwes, J., Eisen, E., Engel, L., Fenske, R., Fleming, L., Fletcher, T., Fontham, E., Forastiere, F., Frentzel-Beyme, R., Fritschi, Lin, Gerin, M., Goldberg, M., Grandjean, P., Grimsrud, T., Gustavsson, P., Haines, A., Hartge, P., Hansen, J., Hauptmann, M., Heederik, D., Hemminki, K., Hemon, D., Hertz-Picciotto, I., Hoppin, J., Huff, J., Jarvholm, B., Kang, D., Karagas, M., Kjaerheim, K., Kjuus, H., Kogevinas, M., Kriebel, D., Kristensen, P., Kromhout, H., Laden, F., Lebailly, P., Lemasters, G., Lubin, J., Lynch, C., Lynge, E., Mannetje, A., McMichael, A., McLaughlin, J., Marrett, L., Martuzzi, M., Merchant, J., Merler, E., Merletti, F., Miller, A., Mirer, F., Monson, R., Nordby, K., Olshan, A., Parent, M., Perera, F., Perry, M., Pesatori, A., Pirastu, R., Porta, M., Pukkala, E., Rice, C., Richardson, D., Ritter, L., Ritz, B., Ronckers, C., Rushton, L., Rusiecki, J., Rusyn, I., Samet, J., Sandler, D., de Sanjose, S., Schernhammer, E., Costantini, A., Seixas, N., Shy, C., Siemiatycki, J., Silverman, D., Simonato, L., Smith, A., Smith, M., Spinelli, J., Spitz, M., Stallones, L., Stayner, L., Steenland, K., Stenzel, M., Stewart, B., Stewart, P., Symanski, E., Terracini, B., Tolbert, P., Vainio, H., Vena, J., Vermeulen, R., Victora, C., Ward, E., Weinberg, C., Weisenburger, D., Wesseling, C., Weiderpass, E., and Zahm, S.

Abstract

Background: Recently, the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) Programme for the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans has been criticized for several of its evaluations, and also for the approach used to perform these evaluations. Some critics have claimed that failures of IARC Working Groups to recognize study weaknesses and biases of Working Group members have led to inappropriate classification of a number of agents as carcinogenic to humans. oBjectives: The authors of this Commentary are scientists from various disciplines relevant to the identification and hazard evaluation of human carcinogens. We examined criticisms of the IARC classification process to determine the validity of these concerns. Here, we present the results of that examination, review the history of IARC evaluations, and describe how the IARC evaluations are performed. discussion: We concluded that these recent criticisms are unconvincing. The procedures employed by IARC to assemble Working Groups of scientists from the various disciplines and the techniques followed to review the literature and perform hazard assessment of various agents provide a balanced evaluation and an appropriate indication of the weight of the evidence. Some disagreement by individual scientists to some evaluations is not evidence of process failure. The review process has been modified over time and will undoubtedly be altered in the future to improve the process. Any process can in theory be improved, and we would support continued review and improvement of the IARC processes. This does not mean, however, that the current procedures are flawed. conclusions: The IARC Monographs have made, and continue to make, major contributions to the scientific underpinning for societal actions to improve the public’s health.

Published
2015

33. Childhood Acute Leukemia, Early Common Infections, and Allergy: The ESCALE Study

Author

Rudant, J., primary, Orsi, L., additional, Menegaux, F., additional, Petit, A., additional, Baruchel, A., additional, Bertrand, Y., additional, Lambilliotte, A., additional, Robert, A., additional, Michel, G., additional, Margueritte, G., additional, Tandonnet, J., additional, Mechinaud, F., additional, Bordigoni, P., additional, Hemon, D., additional, and Clavel, J., additional

Published
2010
Full Text
View/download PDF

49. Leukaemia near La Hague nuclear plant

Author

Clavel, J., primary, Hemon, D., additional, Law, G., additional, Roman, E., additional, Wakeford, R., additional, Barton, C., additional, Ryder, H., additional, Hesse-Honegger, C., additional, and Viel, J.-F., additional

Published
1997
Full Text
View/download PDF

Catalog

Books, media, physical & digital resources
See catalog results