Search

Objective: To analyse the clinical efficacy and adverse drug reactions (ADRs) of iron preparations., Methods: A total of 374 patients with iron deficiency anaemia admitted to our hospital between 1 January and 31 December 2020 were included in this study. They were divided into 2 groups based on their medication regimens: Group A (n = 187) took oral ferrous succinate tablets, and Group B (n = 187) received intravenous iron sucrose. The remission of major symptoms, laboratory test results, ADRs and other related data were collected after 4 weeks of treatment., Results: Compared with the pre-treatment baseline, haemoglobin (Hb), serum iron (SI), serum ferritin (SF) and the mean corpuscular volume (MCV) increased in both groups at 4 weeks of treatment (P < 0.05). After treatment, Group A had lower levels of Hb (108.41 ± 8.39 vs. 122.31 ± 6.04 g/L, t = 6.293, P < 0.001), SI (9.72 ± 4.24 vs. 15.62 ± 5.41 µmol/L, t = 5.482, P < 0.001) and SF (27.1 ± 10.82 vs. 39.82 ± 10.44 ug/L, t = 6.793, P < 0.001) compared with Group B. In contrast, there was no significant difference in the post-treatment level of MCV (P > 0.05). The overall response rate significantly differed between the 2 groups (78.61% vs. 90.91%, χ 2  = 10.949, P < 0.001). The incidence of ADRs of both groups were similar, and the difference was not statistically significant (χ 2  = 0.035, P = 0.851)., Conclusion: Iron sucrose demonstrates favourable efficacy and safety in treating iron deficiency anaemia., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: Hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF) prolyl hydroxylase inhibitors are an oral treatment for anemia of chronic kidney disease (CKD). In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we assessed long-term safety of HIF prolyl hydroxylase inhibitors., Methods: We searched MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane databases for randomized trials comparing HIF prolyl hydroxylase inhibitors with an erythropoiesis-stimulating agent (ESA) or placebo with greater than or equal to 48 weeks of follow-up. The primary outcome was major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE), defined as a composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, or stroke. Treatment effects were pooled using random-effects models., Results: Twenty-five trials involving 26,478 participants were included. Of these, 13 trials enrolled 13,230 participants with dialysis-dependent CKD, and 12 trials enrolled 13,248 participants with nondialysis-dependent CKD. There was no evidence that HIF prolyl hydroxylase inhibitors and ESA had different effects on MACE in people with dialysis-dependent CKD (risk ratio, 0.99; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.92 to 1.08) or people with nondialysis-dependent CKD (risk ratio, 1.08; 95% CI, 0.95 to 1.22). Similarly, there was no evidence that HIF prolyl hydroxylase inhibitors and placebo had different effects on MACE (risk ratio, 1.10; 95% CI, 0.96 to 1.27) in people with nondialysis-dependent CKD. The lack of difference between HIF prolyl hydroxylase inhibitors and ESA or placebo was observed for individual components of MACE and cardiovascular death. Safety of HIF prolyl hydroxylase inhibitors for other outcomes was comparable with ESA in dialysis-dependent CKD. In nondialysis-dependent CKD, dialysis access thrombosis, venous thromboembolism, infections, and hyperkalemia occurred more frequently with HIF prolyl hydroxylase inhibitors in placebo-controlled trials but not in ESA-controlled trials., Conclusions: There was no evidence of a difference in the long-term cardiovascular safety profile of HIF prolyl hydroxylase inhibitors and ESA in adults with dialysis-dependent CKD and adults with nondialysis-dependent CKD. (PROSPERO registration number, CRD42021278011.).

Competing Interests: YFM has received honoraria or consulting fees from BMS, Kura Oncology, BluePrint Medicines, Geron, OncLive and MD Education, VJHemOnc, and Medscape Live; has participated in advisory boards and received honoraria from Sierra Oncology, Stemline Therapeutics, Blueprint Medicines, Morphosys, Taiho Oncology, SOBI, Rigel Pharmaceuticals, Geron, Cogent Biosciences, and Novartis; and has received travel reimbursement from Blueprint Medicines, MD Education, and Morphosys. AED has participated in advisory boards or had a consultancy with and received honoraria from Celgene/BMS, Agios, Novartis, Appellis, and Gilead; and has served on clinical trial committees or data safety and monitoring boards for Novartis, AbbVie, Kura, Geron, Servier, Keros, Shuattuck Labs, and Celgene/BMS.

Background: The preplanned interim analysis of the COMMANDS trial showed greater efficacy of luspatercept than epoetin alfa for treating anaemia in erythropoiesis-stimulating agent (ESA)-naive patients with transfusion-dependent, lower-risk myelodysplastic syndromes. In this Article, we report the results of the primary analysis of the trial., Methods: COMMANDS is a phase 3, open-label, randomised, controlled trial conducted at 142 sites in 26 countries. Eligible patients were those aged 18 years or older, with myelodysplastic syndromes of very low risk, low risk, or intermediate risk (as defined by the Revised International Prognostic Scoring System), who were ESA-naive and transfusion dependent, and had a serum erythropoietin concentration of less than 500 U/L. Patients were stratified by baseline red blood cell transfusion burden, serum erythropoietin concentration, and ring sideroblast status, and randomly allocated (1:1) to receive luspatercept (1·0-1·75 mg/kg body weight, subcutaneously, once every 3 weeks) or epoetin alfa (450-1050 IU/kg body weight, subcutaneously, once a week; maximum total dose 80 000 IU) for at least 24 weeks. The primary endpoint was red blood cell transfusion independence lasting at least 12 weeks with a concurrent mean haemoglobin increase of at least 1·5 g/dL (weeks 1-24), evaluated in the intention-to-treat population. The safety population included all patients who received at least one dose of treatment. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03682536; active, not recruiting)., Findings: Between Jan 2, 2019, and Sept 29, 2022, 363 patients were screened and randomly allocated: 182 (50%) to luspatercept and 181 (50%) to epoetin alfa. Median age was 74 years (IQR 69-80), 162 (45%) patients were female, and 201 (55%) were male. 289 (80%) were White, 44 (12%) were Asian, and two (1%) were Black or African American. 23 (6%) were Hispanic or Latino and 311 (86%) were not Hispanic or Latino. Median follow-up for the primary endpoint was 17·2 months (10·4-27·7) for the luspatercept group and 16·9 months (10·1-26·6) for the epoetin alfa group. A significantly greater proportion of patients in the luspatercept group reached the primary endpoint (110 [60%] vs 63 [35%]; common risk difference on response rate 25·4% [95% CI 15·8-35·0]; p<0·0001). Median follow-up for safety analyses was 21·4 months (IQR 14·2-32·4) for the luspatercept group and 20·3 months (12·7-30·9) for the epoetin alfa group. Common grade 3-4 treatment-emergent adverse events occurring among luspatercept recipients (n=182) were hypertension (19 [10%] patients), anaemia (18 [10%]), pneumonia (ten [5%]), syncope (ten [5%]), neutropenia (nine [5%]), thrombocytopenia (eight [4%]), dyspnoea (eight [4%]), and myelodysplastic syndromes (six [3%]); and among epoetin alfa recipients (n=179) were anaemia (14 [8%]), pneumonia (14 [8%]), neutropenia (11 [6%]), myelodysplastic syndromes (ten [6%]), hypertension (eight [4%]), iron overload (seven [4%]), and COVID-19 pneumonia (six [3%]). The most common serious treatment-emergent adverse events in both groups were pneumonia (nine [5%] luspatercept recipients and 13 [7%] epoetin alfa recipients) and COVID-19 (eight [4%] luspatercept recipients and ten [6%] epoetin alfa recipients). One death (due to acute myeloid leukaemia) considered to be luspatercept-related was reported at the interim analysis., Interpretation: Luspatercept represents a new standard of care for ESA-naive patients with transfusion-dependent, lower-risk myelodysplastic syndromes. Significantly more patients had red blood cell transfusion independence and haematological improvement with luspatercept than with epoetin alfa, with benefits observed across patient subgroups., Funding: Celgene and Acceleron Pharma., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests Editorial and medical writing support were funded by Bristol Myers Squibb. MGDP reports receiving honoraria from and advisory or data safety monitoring board fees from Bristol Myers Squibb. GG-M reports receiving consulting fees from Bristol Myers Squibb; research support from AbbVie, Astex, Bristol Myers Squibb, Chordia, Curis, Genentech, Novartis, Rigel Pharmaceuticals, and Zentalis; and honoraria from Astex and Curis. VS reports receiving honoraria from AbbVie, Bristol Myers Squibb, and Novartis; travel support from AbbVie and Jazz Pharmaceuticals; and advisory or data safety monitoring board fees from AbbVie, Bristol Myers Squibb, CTI BioPharma, Curis, Geron, Gilead, Keros, Menarini, Novartis, Servier, and Syros. AMZ reports receiving grant support from AbbVie, Amgen, Astex, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, Geron, Kura, Novartis, Otsuka, Shattuck Labs, and Syros; and consulting fees and honoraria from AbbVie, Agios, Akeso Pharma, ALX Oncology, Amgen, Astellas Pharma, BeiGene, BioCryst, Bristol Myers Squibb, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celgene, Chiesi, Daiichi Sankyo, Epizyme, Faron, Genentech, Geron, Gilead, Glycomimetics, Hikma, Janssen, Karyopharma, Keros, Kura, Kyowa Kirin, Lava Therapeutics, Medus, Notable, Novartis, Orum, Otsuka, Pfizer, Regeneron, Rigel Pharmaceuticals, Schrodinger, Servier, Sumitomo Pharma, Syndax, Syros, Taiho, Takeda, Treadwell, Vincerx, and Zentalis. RSK reports receiving grant support from Bristol Myers Squibb; consulting fees from Geron, Janssen, and Sumitomo Pharma; speakers bureau fees from AbbVie, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Pharma Essentia, Rigel Pharmaceuticals, Servio, and Sobi; and advisory or data safety monitoring board fees from AbbVie, Bristol Myers Squibb, DSI, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Pharma Essentia, Rigel Pharmaceuticals, Servio, Sobi, and Sumitomo Pharma. JS reports receiving grant support from Amgen Australia, Astex Pharmaceuticals, and Bristol Myers Squibb; consulting fees paid to himself from Astellas Pharma, Mundipharma, Novartis, Otsuka, and Pfizer; speakers bureau fees paid to himself and his institution from Mundipharma and Novartis; support for meeting attendance from AstraZeneca (no payment to healthcare provider); being a named investigator on patent PCT/AU2021/050562 assigned to his institution; trial steering committee fees paid to his institution from Bristol Myers Squibb; and serving an unpaid appointment on the Australasia Leukaemia and Lymphoma Group Scientific Advisory Committee. DV reports receiving consulting fees from Amgen, Astellas Pharma, Bristol Myers Squibb, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Kite Pharma, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Sanofi, and Sobi; honoraria from Agios, Amgen, Astellas Pharma, Bristol Myers Squibb, Gebro, Grifols, Janssen, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Kite Pharma, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Pfizer, Sanofi, and Sobi; travel support from Bristol Myers Squibb, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Novartis, Sanofi, and Sobi; and advisory or data safety monitoring board fees from Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Grifols, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Novartis, Servier, and Sobi. AJ reports receiving support for study materials from Bristol Myers Squibb; consulting fees from Bristol Myers Squibb; honoraria from AbbVie, Bristol Myers Squibb, and Novartis; travel support from AbbVie and Novartis; advisory or data safety monitoring board fees from AbbVie, Bristol Myers Squibb, GSK, and Novartis; and a leadership or fiduciary role as the head of the Czech MDS Group. JL, RP, SK, KLK, TP, and YL are employed by and own stock in Bristol Myers Squibb. JZ is employed by Bristol Myers Squibb. VP is employed by and owns stock in Bristol Myers Squibb and owns stock in Merck. SR is employed by, owns stock in, and has received travel support from Bristol Myers Squibb and owns stock in Celgene. AD reports receiving honoraria from Bristol Myers Squibb; travel support from Johnson & Johnson; and advisory or data safety monitoring board fees from Swixx BioPharma. TC reports receiving consulting fees from AbbVie, Agios, BluePrint, Bristol Myers Squibb/Celgene, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Novartis, and Servier; honoraria from Astellas, Bristol Myers Squibb/Celgene, Incyte, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Novartis, Servier, and Takeda; travel support from AbbVie, Bristol Myers Squibb/Celgene, Gilead, Novartis, Pfizer, and Servier; and advisory or data safety monitoring board fees from Astellas, Bristol Myers Squibb/Celgene, Incyte, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Novartis, Servier, and Takeda. PF reports receiving grant support from AbbVie, Agios, Bristol Myers Squibb, and Novartis; and honoraria from AbbVie, Agios, Bristol Myers Squibb, and Novartis. UP reports receiving grant support paid to GWT-TUD, from Amgen and Janssen; grant support, paid to University of Leipzig, from Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck, and Novartis; consulting fees from AbbVie, Bristol Myers Squibb, Curis, Geron, Janssen, and Novartis; honoraria from Bristol Myers Squibb and Novartis; and fees for serving on a steering committee and travel support from Bristol Myers Squibb. All other authors declare no competing interests., (2024 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies.)

Introduction: Real-world studies of lower-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (LR-MDS) are limited. We evaluated treatment patterns, clinical outcomes, and healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) among patients with LR-MDS treated with erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) in the United States., Patients and Methods: This retrospective study included patients with LR-MDS who initiated treatment with ESAs between January 1, 2016 and June 30, 2019. The primary analysis assessed patient demographic and clinical characteristics, treatment patterns, clinical outcomes (hematologic response, transfusion requirements, disease progression), and HCRU (medical encounters, laboratory tests, and medication use). Subgroup analyses of patients repeatedly treated with ESA therapy evaluated selected clinical outcomes and primary ESA failure by SF3B1 mutational status, per recently updated NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines©)., Results: A total of 142 patients were included with a median follow-up time of 17 months (interquartile range [IQR], 7-33). Median age at ESA initiation was 79 years (IQR, 73-85). Patients were predominantly male (54%), overweight or obese (32% and 23%, respectively), of White race (96%) and non-Hispanic ethnicity (89%). Overall, 57% patients were initially treated with darbepoetin alfa and 43% with epoetin alfa. Clinical outcomes were poor, and there was a significant burden on both the health system and individual patients treated with ESA therapies. Hematologic improvement- erythroid was only seen in 26% of 142 patients treated with ESAs, and 65% of 82 retreated patients experienced primary ESA failure., Conclusion: Our results indicate that primary ESA failure is largely unrecognized and that many patients should be considered for alternative treatments., Competing Interests: Disclosure Guillermo Garcia-Manero received research support from Bristol Myers Squibb. Rayna K. Matsuno, Hina Mohammed, Danny Idryo, Ronda Broome, Autumn Herriman, Tiffany Johnson, Kristiana Wilkinson, Andrew Schrag, and Monika Izano are employees of Syapse. Rayna K. Matsuno, Hina Mohammed, Ronda Broome, Kristiana Wilkinson, and Monika Izano report divested equity in a private or publicly traded company in the past 24 months at Syapse. Rayna K. Matsuno, Hina Mohammed, Tiffany Johnson, and Colden Johanson also report research funding from Bristol Myers Squibb. Ali McBride and Adeola Makinde are employees of Bristol Myers Squibb. Sudipto Mukherjee participated in advisory boards for AbbVie, Blueprint Medicines, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene/Acceleron, EUSA Pharma, Genentech, and Novartis; received honoraria from the Aplastic Anemia and MDS International Foundation, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, McGraw Hill Hematology Oncology Board Review, Partnership for Health Analytic Research, and EUSA Pharma; reports consultancy from BioPharm, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, EUSA Pharma, and Novartis; and research funding to the institution from Celgene, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, and Novartis., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Anemia is a common but often underdiagnosed and undertreated geriatric syndrome in hospitalized older patients. In this retrospective multicenter study, we aimed at characterizing the prevalence, risk factors, diagnostic and treatment approach to anemia in older patients admitted to acute care hospitals, focusing on differences between nephrology and geriatrics units. Prevalence and risk factors for anemia, diagnostic inertia (lack of iron, vitamin B12, and folate status assessment), replacement inertia (omitted treatment with iron, vitamin B12 or folic acid), and erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESA) inertia were explored. 1963 patients aged 82.7 (6.8) years were included in the study; 66.7% of the study population had anemia; among anemic patients, diagnostic inertia and replacement inertia were common with rates of 22-31% and 50-87%, respectively; omitted treatment with ESA affected 67.2% of patients and was more prevalent in geriatric units. In most cases, patients with ESA inertia were not routinely screened for iron tests. COPD, cancer, eGFR 45-60 ml/min were associated with increased tendency to ESA inertia. In conclusion, anemia had a high prevalence in older patients discharged from acute care units, but it is often underdiagnosed and undertreated., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Introduction: Postpartum anaemia is often caused by iron deficiency with onset during the antepartum period and can be exacerbated by excessive blood loss at birth. Its prevalence is estimated as 50-80% in low-income and middle-income countries. It poses adverse consequences on the mother and negatively impacts her ability to care for her newborn. Prompt treatment of postpartum anaemia is thus important. Adherence to oral iron is reportedly low in Nigeria due to its side effects and forgetfulness by the mothers. Intravenous iron such as ferric carboxymaltose, given as a single dose, might help overcome adherence issues, but investigation in a high-quality randomised control trial in Nigeria is first required while evaluation of challenges around its implementation is also warranted., Objective: To determine the clinical effectiveness, tolerability and safety, of using intravenous ferric carboxymaltose (intervention) vs oral ferrous sulphate (control) for treating moderate to severe iron deficiency anaemia in postpartum women and to evaluate implementation of ferric carboxymaltose in treating postpartum anaemia in Nigeria., Methods and Analysis: This study is an open-label randomised controlled trial with a concurrent implementation study. It is a hybrid type 1 effectiveness-implementation design conducted in four states across Northern and Southern Nigeria. A total of 1400 eligible and consenting women with postpartum moderate to severe anaemia (haemoglobin concentration <100 g/L) will be randomised to intravenous ferric carboxymaltose; a single dose at 20 mg/kg to a maximum of 1000 mg infusion administered at enrolment (intervention) or oral ferrous sulphate; 200 mg (65 mg elemental iron) two times per day from enrolment until 6 weeks postpartum (control). The primary outcome, proportion of participants who are anaemic (Hb <110 g/L) at 6 weeks postpartum will be analysed by intention-to-treat. Haemoglobin concentration, full blood count, serum iron, serum ferritin, transferrin saturation and total iron binding capacity will be measured at specific intervals. Implementation outcomes such as acceptability and feasibility of using ferric carboxymaltose for postpartum anaemia treatment in Nigeria will be assessed., Ethics and Dissemination: This study is approved by the ethics committee of the teaching hospitals, Ministry of Health of the four states as required, National Health Research Ethics Committee and the drug regulatory agency, National Agency for Food and Drug Administration and Control (NAFDAC). Findings of this research will be presented at conferences and will be published in international peer-reviewed journals and shared with stakeholders within and outside Nigeria., Trial Registration Number: International standard randomised controlled trial number: ISRCTN51426226., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ.)

Objective: Chronic kidney disease (CKD)-associated anaemia has substantial biopsychosocial impacts. This study explores the impact of CKD-associated anaemia and treatment preferences from the patient perspective., Design: Cross-sectional survey., Setting: Anonymised online survey implemented by Ipsos UK on behalf of the National Kidney Federation and GSK from October 2022 to January 2023., Participants: Data were collected from UK adults living with CKD (self-reported)., Primary and Secondary Outcome Measures: Outcome measures were exploratory and not predefined. The cross-sectional survey was designed to explore the biopsychosocial impact of living with anaemia on individuals with CKD; their unmet needs; the treatment strategies typically implemented and the associated barriers/facilitators to adherence; the healthcare professional-patient relationship with regard to anaemia diagnosis and management., Results: Of 101 participants, 90 (89%) were patients with CKD and 11 (11%) were informal carers. 96 (95%) participants reported symptom(s) relevant to their experience of CKD. 88 (87%) participants reported symptom(s) associated with anaemia and 61 (64%) expressed an impact on daily life including 18 (19%) unable to perform daily activities, 13 (14%) unable to go to work and 9 (9%) reporting poor social life/interactions. 85 (84%) participants reported they have received treatment for anaemia: intravenous iron (n=55, 54%), iron tablets (n=29, 29%), erythropoietin-stimulating agents (ESAs) via an autoinjector (n=28, 28%), ESA injections via a syringe (n=24, 24%), ESA injections via a dialysis machine (n=17, 17%), folic acid (n=22, 22%) and blood transfusion (n=17, 17%). Six of seven (86%) participants who received their ESA from a healthcare professional at home preferred injections whereas 13/27 (48%) participants who injected themselves at home preferred oral tablets., Conclusions: There is not a 'one-size-fits-all' approach to the management of CKD-associated anaemia. A personalised approach incorporating the treatment preferences of the individual should be explored when discussing treatment options., Competing Interests: Competing interests: KLH and PR declare no conflicts of interest. JR is an employee of Ipsos and received honoraria for speaking as part of a GSK panel at UK Kidney Week 2023 congress and for an internal seminar delivered to Astellas. CC and MM are employees of and hold shares in GSK. JK was an employee of GSK at the time of the study and is currently an employee of Medice UK Ltd. SP is an employee of Ipsos. JOB received payment for participating in speaker’s bureaus for GSK and CSL Vifor., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Rationale: Pharmacological mechanism of Roxadustat in the treatment of renal anemia., Patient Concerns: To investigate the efficacy and safety of combined Roxadustat and erythropoiesis stimulator (ESA) treatment of renal anemia in hemodialysis patients with secondary hyperparathyroidism., Diagnoses: A retrospective analysis was conducted on hemodialysis patients with renal anemia and secondary hyperparathyroidism treated with ESAs alone, who were admitted to our hospital from March 2022 to December 2022., Interventions: The patients were treated with Roxadustat combined with ESAs for 3 months, during which oral iron supplementation was given, and the changes in Hb levels and laboratory-related indicators before and after the combined treatment were analyzed., Outcomes: The results showed that a total of 13 patients received combination therapy, with a significant increase in Hb compared to ESAs alone (t = -3.955, P = .002). The Hb qualification rate was 38.46%, and the ∆Hb response rate was 76.92%. The parathyroid hormone significantly decreased with a statistically significant difference (Z = -2.062b, P = .039). Hemoglobin (RBC), total iron binding capacity, and serum ferritin (male) were significantly increased compared to ESAs alone. Total cholesterol and low-density lipoprotein were significantly lower than ESAs alone. The differences in the changes in the above indicators were statistically significant (P < .05). There was no statistically significant difference in changes in other laboratory-related indicators (P > .05). No adverse reactions were observed during the combined treatment of 13 patients., Lessons Subsections: The combination of Roxadustat and ESAs can effectively improve renal anemia in hemodialysis patients with secondary hyperparathyroidism, as well as improve indicators of hyperparathyroidism and blood lipid levels with high levels of safety. This combined treatment thus provides a new and safe treatment method for these patients., Competing Interests: The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose., (Copyright © 2024 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.)

We aimed to compare the clinical efficacy and safety of roxadustat with erythropoiesis-stimulating agents, particularly erythropoietin (EPO), in the treatment of maintenance hemodialysis patients with renal anemia. A prospective cohort study was carried out at the Nephrology Department of the Nantong First People's Hospital and Nantong University Affiliated Hospital from December 2020 to December 2021. We compared hemoglobin (Hb) levels, serum ferritin (SF) levels, and adverse cardiovascular events between the roxadustat and EPO groups at 1, 3, and 6 months into the treatment. A total of 209 patients participated in the study, with 112 in the roxadustat group and 97 in the EPO group. At baseline, no statistically significant differences were observed between the 2 groups in terms of age, gender, weight, dialysis modality and duration, previous EPO dosage, Hb levels, SF levels, transferrin saturation, heart function classification, and blood pressure levels (P > .05). After 1 month, Hb levels in the roxadustat group were significantly higher than those in the EPO group (P < .05). However, no statistically significant differences were found between the 2 groups at 3 and 6 months (P > .05). Additionally, there were no significant differences in SF levels and the occurrence of adverse cardiovascular events between the 2 groups after treatment (P > .05). Roxadustat was superior to EPO in the initial treatment phase, while its cardiovascular safety was comparable to that of EPO., Competing Interests: The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose., (Copyright © 2024 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.)

Chronic anemia is an independent risk factor for mortality in patients with heart failure (HF). Restoring physiological hemoglobin (Hb) levels is essential to increase oxygen transport capacity to tissues and improve cell metabolism as well as physical and cardiac performance. Nutritional deficits and iron deficiency are the major causes of chronic anemia, but other etiologies include chronic kidney disease, inflammatory processes, and unexplained anemia. Hormonal therapy, including erythropoietin (EPO) and anabolic treatment in chronic anemia HF patients, may contribute to improving Hb levels and clinical outcomes. Although preliminary studies showed a beneficial effect of EPO therapy on cardiac efficiency and in HF, more recent studies have not confirmed this positive impact of EPO, alluding to its side effect profile. Physical exercise significantly increases Hb levels and the response of anemia to treatment. In malnourished patients and chronic inflammatory processes, low levels of anabolic hormones, such as testosterone and insulin-like growth factor-1, contribute to the development of chronic anemia. This paper aims to review the effect of nutrition, EPO, anabolic hormones, standard HF treatments, and exercise as regulatory mechanisms of chronic anemia and their cardiovascular consequences in patients with HF., (© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany.)

Previous studies have demonstrated that erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) can reduce anemia and improve quality of life in cancer patients, but ESAs may increase mortality. Therefore, we conducted a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCT) comparing the effect and risk of ESAs about the prevention or treatment of anemia in cancer patients. Four databases including PubMed, Embase, Web of science and Cochrane Library were searched for published RCTS on ESAs in the treatment of anemia in lung cancer patients from 2000 to 2023. Endpoints including mortality, incidence of thrombotic vascular events, blood transfusion requirement, and incidence of adverse events. Our meta-analysis included 8 studies, with a sample size of 4240 patients, including 2548 patients in the ESAs group and 1692 patients in the control group. The risk of mortality was lower in patients using ESAs than control group (RR 0.96, 95% CI 0.92-0.99, P = 0.02). But there was no significant difference in the risk of mortality between the patients using ESAs and controls (RR 0.99, 95% CI 0.92-1.06, P = 0.69) after removing Pere 2020. Subgroup analysis found that patients diagnosed with small cell lung cancer (SCLC) (RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.92-1.08, P = 0.16) or non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) (RR 1.01, 95% CI 0.87-1.17, P = 0.13) were no significant difference in mortality rate. The thrombotic vascular events increase in patients using ESAs than control group (RR 1.40, 95% CI 1.13-1.72, P = 0.002). The blood transfusion requirement of ESAs group was lower than control group (RR 0.56, 95% CI 0.44-0.72, P < 0.00001). And the subgroups of Darbepoetin alfa (RR 0.57, 95% CI 0.41-0.79, P = 0.003) and Epoetin alfa (RR 0.68, 95% CI 0.47-0.99, P = 0.01) had lower transfusion requirements than the control group. In the SCLC subgroup (RR 0.51, 95% CI 0.40-0.65, P = 0.34), blood transfusion requirements were lower in the ESAs group, but there was no significant difference between the subgroup of patients with NSCLC (RR 0.61, 95% CI 0.36-1.04, P = 0.009). There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in the incidence of adverse reactions (RR 0.98, 95% CI 0.95-1.00, P = 0.10). In conclusion, ESAs does not increase the mortality of lung cancer patients or may reduce the risk of death, and can reduce the need for blood transfusion, although ESA can increase the incidence of thrombotic vascular adverse events.Registration PROSPERO CRD42023463582., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Traditionally, the treatment of anemia associated with chronic kidney disease (CKD) involves prescribing erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) or iron preparations. The effectiveness and safety of ESAs and iron have been established. However, several clinical issues, such as hyporesponsiveness to ESAs or defective iron utilization for erythropoiesis, have been demonstrated. Recently, a new class of therapeutics for renal anemia known as hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF)/proline hydroxylase (PH) inhibitors has been developed. Several studies have reported that HIF-PH inhibitors have unique characteristics compared with those of ESAs. In particular, the use of HIF-PH inhibitors may maintain target Hb concentration in patients treated with a high dose of ESAs without increasing the dose. Furthermore, several recent studies have demonstrated that patients with CKD with defective iron utilization for erythropoiesis had a high risk of cardiovascular events or premature death. HIF-PH inhibitors increase iron transport and absorption from the gastrointestinal tract; thus, they may ameliorate defective iron utilization for erythropoiesis in patients with CKD. Conversely, several clinical problems, such as aggravation of thrombotic and embolic complications, diabetic retinal disease, and cancer, have been noted at the time of HIF-PH inhibitor administration. Recently, several pooled analyses of phase III trials have reported the non-inferiority of HIF-PH inhibitors regarding these clinical concerns compared with ESAs. The advantages and issues of anemia treatment by ESAs, iron preparations, and HIF-PH inhibitors must be fully understood. Moreover, patients with anemia and CKD should be treated by providing a physiological erythropoiesis environment that is similar to that of healthy individuals.

We report a case series of two patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) who developed erythropoietin-induced pure red cell aplasia following a change in erythropoietin preparation. Both patients responded well to immunosuppressive treatments, but unfortunately developed severe infections as a result of being immunosuppressed., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest None., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Background: Erythropoietin resistance is present in some patients with chronic kidney disease, especially in those undergoing hemodialysis, and is often treated using roxadustat rather than iron supplements and erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs). However, some patients cannot afford full doses of roxadustat. This retrospective study investigated the efficacy of low-dose roxadustat combined with recombinant human erythropoietin (rhuEPO) therapy in 39 patients with erythropoietin-resistant renal anemia undergoing maintenance hemodialysis (3-4 sessions/week)., Methods: The ability of the combination of low-dose roxadustat and rhuEPO to increase the hemoglobin concentration over 12 weeks was assessed. Markers of iron metabolism were evaluated. Eligible adults received 50-60% of the recommended dose of roxadustat and higher doses of rhuEPO., Results: The mean hemoglobin level increased from 77.67 ± 11.18 g/dL to 92.0 ± 8.35 g/dL after treatment, and the hemoglobin response rate increased to 72%. The mean hematocrit level significantly increased from 24.26 ± 3.99% to 30.04 ± 3.69%. The soluble transferrin receptor level increased (27.29 ± 13.60 mg/L to 38.09 ± 12.78 mg/L), while the total iron binding capacity (49.22 ± 11.29 mg/L to 43.91 ± 12.88 mg/L) and ferritin level (171.05 ± 54.75 ng/mL to 140.83 ± 42.03 ng/mL) decreased., Conclusion: Therefore, in patients with ESA-resistant anemia who are undergoing hemodialysis, the combination of low-dose roxadustat and rhuEPO effectively improves renal anemia and iron metabolism., Competing Interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2024 Xu, Huang, Liu, Wang, Liu, Song, Dou, Lv and Liu.)

Introduction: Erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) together with iron supplementation had been the standard treatment for anemia in chronic kidney disease (CKD) for the past decades. Recently, hypoxia-inducible factor-prolyl hydroxylase inhibitors (HIF-PHIs) have attracted attention as a novel treatment option., Areas Covered: This review summarizes the effectiveness and the safety of HIF-PHIs based on previous clinical trials and discusses points to consider for their clinical use., Expert Opinion: The results from clinical trials demonstrate that HIF-PHIs are non-inferior to ESAs in terms of the efficacy to maintain or improve blood hemoglobin levels. However, concerns about adverse events including cardiovascular outcomes, thrombotic events, and tumor progression have prevented HIF-PHIs from being widely approved for clinical use. Also, long-term safety has not been demonstrated yet. Practically, HIF-PHIs should be used with caution in patients with a history of thrombosis or active malignancy. Patients without them may be preferable for HIF-PHIs if those are bothered with regular injections of ESAs or are hyporesponsive to ESAs without obvious reasons, provided that the drugs were approved in the country. Even so, clinicians must take caution for signs of adverse events such as heart failure after prescribing the drugs.

This updated British Society for Haematology guideline provides an up-to-date literature review and recommendations regarding the identification and management of preoperative anaemia. This includes guidance on thresholds for the diagnosis of anaemia and the diagnosis and management of iron deficiency in the preoperative context. Guidance on the appropriate use of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents and preoperative transfusion is also provided., (© 2024 British Society for Haematology and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Background: Iron deficiency anemia (IDA) increases levels of C-terminal fibroblast growth factor 23 (cFGF23) and platelet count (PLT), each of which is associated with cardiovascular events. Therefore, we hypothesized that iron replacement with ferric citrate hydrate (FC) would decrease cFGF23 levels and PLT in patients with IDA., Methods: In a randomized, open-label, multicenter, 24-week clinical trial, patients with non-dialysis-dependent chronic kidney disease (CKD) and non-CKD complicated by IDA (8.0 ≤ hemoglobin < 11.0 g/dL; and serum ferritin < 50 ng/mL [CKD]; < 12 ng/mL [non-CKD]) were randomized 1:1 to FC-low (500 mg: approximately 120 mg elemental iron/day) or FC-high (1000 mg: approximately 240 mg elemental iron/day). If sufficient iron replacement had been achieved after week 8, further treatment was discontinued., Results: Seventy-three patients were allocated to FC-low (CKD n = 21, non-CKD n = 15) and FC-high (CKD n = 21, non-CKD n = 16). Regardless of CKD status, FC increased serum ferritin and transferrin saturation, did not change intact FGF23 or serum phosphorus, but decreased cFGF23. In FC-low group, median changes in cFGF23 from baseline to week 8 were -58.00 RU/mL in CKD and -725.00 RU/mL in non-CKD; in FC-high group, the median changes were -66.00 RU/mL in CKD and -649.50 RU/mL in non-CKD. By week 8, FC treatment normalized PLT in all patients with high PLT at baseline (>35.2 × 10 4 /µL; FC-low: 1 CKD, 8 non-CKD; FC-high: 3 CKD, 8 non-CKD)., Conclusion: Regardless of CKD status, iron replacement with FC decreased elevated cFGF23 levels and normalized elevated PLT in patients with IDA., Clinical Trial Registration Number: jRCT2080223943., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Both short-acting (epoetin alfa or beta) and long-acting (darbepoetin alfa or PEG-epoetin) erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) are commonly prescribed for patients with kidney failure undergoing maintenance hemodialysis. We compared the risks of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and of all-cause mortality associated with receipt of short- vs. long-acting ESAs. This retrospective cohort analysis included Medicare hemodialysis beneficiaries aged ≥ 18 years in the United States Renal Data System from January 2015 to December 2017. We included adults who survived > 90 days after initiating hemodialysis and received either short- or long-acting ESAs. Outcomes were MACE (first occurrence of stroke, acute myocardial infarction, or cardiovascular-related mortality) and all-cause mortality. After stabilized inverse probability of treatment weighting, Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to estimate the hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) for each outcome. Of 68,607 patients (mean age: 65 years, 45% females), 33,658 (49%) received long-acting ESAs and 34,949 (51%) received short-acting ESAs. There was no difference in the risk of MACE associated with receipt of short- vs. long-acting ESAs (HR: 1.02 (95% CI: 0.98-1.08)). However, long-acting (vs. short-acting) ESA receipt was associated with a lower risk of all-cause mortality (HR: 0.91 (95% CI: 0.87-0.96)). Compared with short-acting ESAs, long-acting ESAs were associated with a lower risk of all-cause mortality, with no difference in the risk of MACE. Future studies with a longer follow-up are needed to confirm these findings., (© 2024 The Authors. Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics © 2024 American Society for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics.)

Anemia is a common complication of chronic kidney disease with major option treatment of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs). This study aimed to investigate the influencing factors of erythropoietin resistance index (ERI) and its association with mortality in maintenance hemodialysis (MHD) patients. Patients enrolled from China Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study (DOPPS) 5 were included. ERI was calculated as follows: ESA (IU/week)/weight (kg, post-dialysis)/hemoglobin level (g/dL). The Cox regression model was used to analyze the influencing factors on survival outcomes. Stepwise multivariate logistic regression was used to identify the related risk factors, and subgroup analyses were performed. A total of 1270 MHD subjects (687 males and 583 females) were included, with an average age of 60 (49.0, 71.0) years. All subjects were divided into two groups by the median ERI of 14.03. Multivariate logistic regression showed that dialysis vintage (OR 0.957, 95% CI: 0.929-0.986), white blood cells (OR 0.900, 95% CI: 0.844-0.960), high flux dialyzer use (OR 0.866, 95% CI: 0.755-0.993), body mass index (OR 0.860, 95% CI: 0.828-0.892), males (OR 0.708, 95% CI: 0.625-0.801), and albumin (OR 0.512, 95% CI: 0.389-0.673) had a negative association with high ERI baseline (all p  < 0.05). There were 176 (13.9%) deaths in total including 89 cardiac/vascular deaths during follow-up. Cox regression analysis showed that ERI was positively associated with all-cause mortality, especially in some subgroups. ERI was associated with increased all-cause mortality in MHD patients, indicating the possibility of death prediction by ERI. Patients with high ERI warrant more attention.

Objective: To evaluate the effects of darbepoetin on platelet population and reactivity in healthy cats (HCs) and azotemic cats with remnant kidney (RK) model-induced chronic kidney disease., Animals: 12 purpose-bred domestic shorthair cats (n = 6 HCs and n = 6 RK)., Methods: In this pilot study, all cats received darbepoetin (1 µg/kg, SC) on days 0, 7, and 14. Blood was sampled at baseline and on days 3, 10, 15, 17, 20, and 21. At each time point, a CBC was performed, platelet aggregometry was assessed by impedance and optical methods, and platelet P-selectin (CD62P) was quantified before and after thrombin stimulation. Additionally, reticulated platelets were quantified using both thiazole orange staining and proprietary analysis by the CBC analyzer. For RK cats, systemic blood pressure (BP) was serially measured., Results: No adverse effects of darbepoetin were seen. There was no statistically significant change in platelet count between or within groups at any time point. Hematocrit increased significantly over time in the RK but not the HC group. RBC reticulocyte numbers in both groups increased over time. Reticulated platelet percentage did not increase in either group. Differences in platelet reactivity within or between groups were not seen in the aggregometry or flow cytometric assessments. In RK cats, indirect BP did not significantly change during the study., Clinical Relevance: This preliminary investigation did not find evidence that darbepoetin administration impacted platelet number, reactivity, nor reticulated platelet count. Anemic RK cats experienced increased hematocrit and RBC reticulocytes as expected with darbepoetin therapy.

Background: Hemodialysis patients are common to have renal anemia in the nephrology practice. For the renal anemia, the high-dose iron from the intravenous route is an important treatment option. We can understand the treatment effects and cardiovascular events of high-dose intravenous iron reviewing the randomized clinical trials., Methods: We compared the high-dose and low-dose iron treatments to find if the high-dose intravenous iron can influence the hematological parameters more significantly than the low-dose iron. The cardiovascular events were also analyzed for the high-dose iron treatment. Six studies with a total of 2422 renal anemia patients under hemodialysis were enrolled. We focused the outcomes of hemoglobin, transferrin saturation percentage, ferritin, erythropoietin dose, and cardiovascular events., Results: The high-dose intravenous iron might be associated with a greater number of ferritin, transferrin saturation percentage, and hemoglobin. In addition, the erythropoietin dose was less needed to maintain the ideal hemoglobin range in the high-dose intravenous iron group., Conclusions: In current meta-analysis, the high-dose intravenous iron might show the superior effects on the ferritin, transferrin saturation percentage, and hemoglobin levels and needed dose of erythropoietin when compared to low-dose iron treatment., Competing Interests: Declaration of conflicting interestsThe author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Background: To date, there is limited evidence on patients utilizing both voxelotor and darbepoetin alfa and its impact on hemoglobin levels. The objective is to evaluate the effect of voxelotor and darbepoetin alfa on hemoglobin levels in patients with SCD., Research Design and Methods: This was a retrospective chart review study that assessed the primary independent variable as the utilization of either voxelotor alone, darbepoetin alfa alone, or the concurrent administration of voxelotor and darbepoetin alfa. Descriptive statistics were utilized to obtain the mean standard deviation for numerical variables and proportions for categorical variables., Results: A total of 23 participants were included in this study. When comparing baseline to 2 months and 3 months, participants on voxelotor alone experienced a 3% decrease and a 6.6% increase in hemoglobin, darbepoetin alfa alone group a 4.3% decrease and a 0.6% increase in hemoglobin and voxelotor and darbepoetin group a 4.4% decrease and a 0.5% decrease in hemoglobin levels. Fifty percent of the participants in the voxelotor group and 6 (66.7%) participants in the voxelotor plus darbepoetin alfa group experienced adverse drug events., Conclusions: Voxelotor resulted in a clinically significant difference in the percent change of hemoglobin from baseline to 3 months.

Purpose: Animal studies have suggested that Erythropoiesis-Stimulating Agents (ESAs) may increase vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-related retinopathies, but this effect is unclear in humans. This study evaluates the risk of vision-threatening diabetic retinopathy (VTDR), defined as either diabetic macular edema (DME) or proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR), in patients exposed to an ESA., Methods: Two analyses were performed. First, a retrospective matched-cohort study was designed using a de-identified commercial and Medicare Advantage medical claims database. The ESA cohort of non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy patients who were new users of an ESA from 2000 to 2022 was matched to controls up to a 3:1 ratio. Exclusion criteria included less than 2 years in the plan, history of VTDR or history of other retinopathy. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression with inverse proportional treatment weighting (IPTW) was used to assess the hazard of developing VTDR, DME, and PDR. The second analysis was a self-controlled case series (SCCS) evaluating the incidence rate ratios (IRR) of VTDR during 30-day periods before and after initiating an ESA., Results: After inclusion of 1502 ESA-exposed patients compared with 2656 controls, IPTW-adjusted hazard ratios found the ESA cohort had an increased hazard of progressing to VTDR (HR = 3.0 95%CI:2.3-3.8; p  < .001) and DME (HR = 3.4,95%CI:2.6-4.4, p  < .001), but not PDR (HR = 1.0,95%CI:0.5-2.3, p  = .95). Similar results were found within the SCCS which demonstrated higher IRRs for VTDR (IRRs = 1.09-1.18; p  < .001) and DME (IRRs = 1.16-1.18; p  < .001), but not increased IRRs in PDR (IRR = 0.92-0.97, p  = .02-0.39)., Conclusion: ESAs are associated with higher risks for VTDR and DME, but not PDR. Those studying ESAs as adjunctive therapy for DR should be cautious of possible unintended effects.

Introduction: The breakthrough in erythropoietin-stimulating agents in the 1990s improved the prognosis and treatment of complications in chronic kidney disease patients and renal anemia. Discovery of the novel molecular mechanisms for hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF) transcription factor under hypoxic conditions has led to the development of oral drugs, HIF-Prolyl Hydroxylase inhibitors (HIF-PHIs), that constantly activate erythropoietin by inhibiting prolyl hydroxylase. HIF-PHIs have gained rapid approval in Asian countries, including Japan, with six distinct types entering clinical application., Areas Covered: This article provides a comprehensive review of the latest literature, with a particular focus on the effectiveness and safety of vadadustat., Expert Opinion: A phase 3, randomized, open-label, clinical trial (PRO 2 TECT) demonstrated that vadadustat had the prespecified non-inferiority for hematologic efficacy as compared with darbepoetin alfa in non-dialysis-dependent patients not previously treated with ESA. However, vadadustat did not show non-inferiority in major adverse cardiovascular events in the non-US/non-Europe patients. It may partly because of imbalances of the baseline eGFR level in those countries. In dialysis-dependent patients, a phase 3 clinical trial (INNO 2 VATE) showed vadadustat was non-inferior to darbepoetin alfa in cardiovascular safety and maintenance of hemoglobin levels. Adverse events including cancer, retinopathy, thrombosis, and vascular calcification should be evaluated in future clinical studies.

Objective: Anemia is a common condition in end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients. Erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) are commonly used to treat anemia in these patients. However, concerns have been raised regarding their potential effects on blood pressure. This systematic review and meta-analysis aim to investigate the relationship between ESAs and changes in systolic and diastolic blood pressure in hemodialysis patients., Method: This study is a systematic review and meta-analysis based on clinical trial studies published in various databases, including Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Science Direct, PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Google Scholar, between 1980 and the end of 2022. We evaluated the quality of articles using the Jadad scale checklist and analyzed the data using Stata 15 software., Results: Our meta-analysis included 34 clinical trial studies. The results showed a significant increase in both systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) after the consumption of ESAs compared to before consumption. The mean difference in SBP was 4.84mmHg (95% CI: 2.74-6.94; p-value<0.001) and in DBP was 4.69mmHg (95% CI: 2.67-6.71; p-value<0.001). No publication bias was observed. Our meta-regression analysis showed that sample size, quality assessment score, and geographical location of the study were significant factors related to observed heterogenicity in to mean difference of SBP (p-value≤0.20). For DBP, the sample size, quality assessment score and follow-up duration were significant variables (p-value≤0.20)., Conclusion: Based on the findings of our study, it appears that receiving ESAs is associated with a significant increase in both SBP and DBP in hemodialysis patients, with an increase of about 5mmHg., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier España, S.L.U. All rights reserved.)

Anemia is a frequent and early chronic kidney disease (CKD) complication. Its management is currently based on oral or intravenous iron supplements, erythropoiesis-stimulating agents, and red blood cell transfusions, when the benefits of transfusion outweigh the risks. Anemia in CKD patients is underdiagnosed and undertreated. Current standard of care is associated with challenges and therefore new treatment approaches have been sought. Hypoxia-inducible factor-prolyl-hydroxylase enzyme inhibitors are a new class of orally administered drugs used to treat anemia associated with CKD. Small-molecule hypoxia-inducible factor-prolyl-hydroxylase inhibitors have a novel mechanism of action that activates the hypoxia-inducible factor (oxygen-sensing) pathway resulting in a coordinated erythropoietic response, leading to increased endogenous erythropoietin production, improved iron absorption and transport, and reduced hepcidin. Roxadustat is the first hypoxia-inducible factor-prolyl-hydroxylase inhibitor approved by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) and reimbursed in Italy by the Italian Medicines Agency (AIFA) for the treatment of adult patients with symptomatic CKD-related anemia. This authorization was based on the outcome of a globally-conducted phase 3 clinical trial program comprising eight pivotal multicenter randomized studies. In the absence of up-to-date guidelines, we performed a critical appraisal of the placement and use of roxadustat in this therapeutic context., (© 2024. The Author(s) under exclusive licence to Italian Society of Nephrology.)

Background/aims: Roxadustat, an oral medication for treating renal anemia, is a hypoxia-inducible factor prolyl hydroxylase inhibitor used for regulating iron metabolism and promoting erythropoiesis. To investigate the efficacy and safety of roxadustat in patients undergoing peritoneal dialysis (PD) with erythropoietin hyporesponsiveness., Methods: Single-center, retrospective study, 81 PD patients (with erythropoietin hyporesponsiveness) were divided into the roxadustat group (n = 61) and erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) group (n = 20). Hemoglobin (Hb), total cholesterol, intact parathyroid hormone (iPTH), brain natriuretic peptide (BNP), related indicators of cardiac function and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) were collected. Additionally, adverse events were also recorded. The follow-up period was 16 weeks., Results: The two groups exhibited similar baseline demographic and clinical characteristics. At baseline, the roxadustat group had a mean Hb level of 89.8 ± 18.9 g/L, while the ESAs group had a mean Hb level of 95.2 ± 16.0 g/L. By week 16, the Hb levels had increased to 118 ± 19.8 g/L (p < 0.05) in the roxadustat group and 101 ± 19.3 g/L (p > 0.05) in the ESAs group. The efficacy of roxadustat in improving anemia was not influenced by baseline levels of hs-CRP and iPTH. Cholesterol was decreased in the roxadustat group without statin use. An increase in left ventricular ejection fraction and stabilization of BNP were observed in the roxadustat group., Conclusion: For PD patients with erythropoietin hyporesponsiveness, roxadustat can significantly improve renal anemia. The efficacy of roxadustat in improving renal anemia was not affected by baseline levels of hs-CRP0 and iPTH.

Background: Acute gastrointestinal bleeding (AGIB) is common in older patients but the use of iron in this context remains understudied., Aims: This study aimed to evaluate prospectively the efficacy of ferric carboxymaltose to treat anaemia in older patients after AGIB., Methods: This randomised double-blinded placebo-controlled clinical trial was conducted in 10 French centres. Eligible patients were 65 years or more, had controlled upper or lower gastrointestinal bleeding and a haemoglobin level of 9-11 g/dl. Patients were randomly assigned, in a 1:1 ratio, to receive either one intravenous iron injection of ferric carboxymaltose or one injection of saline solution. The primary endpoint was the difference in haemoglobin level between day 0 and day 42. Secondary endpoints were treatment-emergent adverse events, serious adverse events, rehospitalisation and improvement of quality of life (QOL) at day 180., Results: From January 2013 to January 2017, 59 patients were included. The median age of patients was 81.9 [75.8, 87.3] years. At day 42, a significant difference in haemoglobin level increase was observed (2.49 g/dl in the ferric carboxymaltose group vs. 1.56 g/dl in the placebo group, P = 0.02). At day 180, QOL, measured on European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30, improved by 10.5 points in the ferric carboxymaltose group and by 8.2 points in the placebo group (P = 0.56). Rates of adverse events and rehospitalisation were similar in the two groups., Conclusions: Intravenous iron seems safe and effective to treat anaemia in older patients after AGIB and should be considered as a standard-of-care treatment. ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01690585)., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Geriatrics Society. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Background: Vadadustat is an oral hypoxia-inducible factor prolyl hydroxylase inhibitor developed for treating anemia in chronic kidney disease (CKD). The purpose of this post-hoc analysis was to investigate the factors affecting the responsiveness to vadadustat in anemia patients with nondialysis-dependent (NDD) or hemodialysis-dependent (HDD) CKD in two Japanese phase 3 studies., Methods: Of 151 and 162 patients enrolled in NDD-CKD and HDD-CKD studies, 136 and 140 patients, respectively, were included and divided into subgroups for the analysis. To assess vadadustat responsiveness, the resistance index was defined as the mean body weight-adjusted dose of vadadustat (mg/kg) at weeks 20-24 divided by the mean hemoglobin (g/dL) at weeks 20-24. Multivariate analysis was performed to identify the variables affecting the resistance index., Results: Independent factors identified as determinants for better response to vadadustat were as follows: high baseline hemoglobin, low baseline eGFR, high week-20-24 ferritin, and CKD not caused by autoimmune disease/glomerulonephritis/vasculitis in NDD-CKD; and male sex, high baseline C-reactive protein, and low baseline erythropoiesis-stimulating agent resistance index (ERI) in HDD-CKD., Conclusions: In this post-hoc analysis, several factors were identified as affecting the response to vadadustat. These results may provide useful information leading to an appropriate dose modification for vadadustat., Clinical Trial Registration: NCT03329196 (MT-6548-J01) and NCT03439137 (MT-6548-J03)., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Anaemia is one of the most common complications of chronic kidney disease (CKD), having a significant impact on quality of life, and is also associated with a number of adverse clinical outcomes. Its pathogenesis is multifactorial, caused largely by an inadequate production of erythropoietin from the diseased kidneys, with iron deficiency, inflammation, shortened red cell lifespan and enhanced blood loss also being contributory factors. The management of this condition was transformed in the late 1980s by the advent of recombinant human erythropoietin (epoetin), and treatment paradigms have developed over the last three decades, largely focusing on a combination of epoetin or its analogues (erythropoiesis-stimulating agents; ESAs) along with iron supplementation, often administered intravenously due to increased hepcidin levels limiting iron absorption from the gut. Indeed, in patients with early CKD and iron deficiency, iron per se may be sufficient to improve the anaemia, delaying the need for ESA therapy. Other causes of anaemia should be excluded and corrected (if possible) before resorting to treatment with ESAs and iron. More recently, the hypoxia-inducible factor-prolyl hydroxylase inhibitors have entered the therapeutic arena; these are orally active agents that upregulate endogenous erythropoietin production as well as a number of iron-regulatory genes which may also enhance erythropoiesis. The latter drugs are highly efficacious, and may have advantages in inflammatory conditions causing resistance to conventional ESA therapy, but concerns exist regarding their safety, particularly in the longer term. This article reviews the current standards of treatment, as well as recent novel developments in the management of anaemia in CKD., (© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the ERA.)

Introduction: Treatment with erythropoietin-stimulating agents (ESAs) is widely used in anemia of chronic kidney disease (CKD). Acquired ESA resistance is an important problem. The aim of this study is to examine the bone marrow findings in hemodialysis patients with ESA-resistant anemia., Methods: The data of 210 patients with acquired ESA resistance were reviewed retrospectively. The patients were divided into groups according to having diagnosis of dysplasia and hematological disease, and survival analysis was performed., Results: A total of 26 patients were included in the study. While dysplasia was present in 10 (38.5%) patients, five of them were diagnosed hematologically. When survival analysis was performed between those with and without a hematological diagnosis, a difference in survival was observed against the group with the diagnosis (24.4 vs. 72 months, p = 0.045)., Conclusion: Unresponsiveness to ESA treatment in CKD patients or a decrease in one of the other cell lines along with hemoglobin, it would be appropriate to perform early bone marrow examination., (© 2023 International Society for Apheresis and Japanese Society for Apheresis.)

Introduction: In patients with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS), anemia is prevalent affecting 80%-85% of low-risk (LR-MDS) patients, with 40% eventually requiring red blood cell (RBC) transfusions. Except forlenalidomide, exclusively approved for those with deletion of chromosome 5q,erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) are the primary treatment choice for low-risk patients. Those unresponsive to ESAs face limited alternatives, eventually necessitating long-term RBC transfusions, leading to secondary iron overload and adversely affecting quality of life (QoL)., Area Covered: Luspatercept is a pioneering erythroid maturation agent. It received approval by both the European Medicines Agency (EMA) and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for treating adults experiencing transfusion-dependent anemia associated with LR-MDS or β-thalassemia. Recently, the FDA approved luspatercept as first- line therapy in patients with very low- to intermediate-risk MDS who require RBC transfusions and have not previously received ESAs. This review summarizes the historical impact of luspatercept intreating LR-MDS unresponsive to ESAs and illustrates its potential benefit asfrontline therapy in MDS and its employment in patients with myelofibrosis-induced anemia., Expert Opinion: Luspatercept has revolutionized the therapeutic paradigm of LR-MDS, for which there was a limited therapeutic arsenal, especially in the setting of patients who did not respond or fail after ESA treatment.

Hypoxia-inducible factor prolyl hydroxylase inhibitors (HIF-PHIs) are new drugs developed for the treatment of anemia associated with chronic kidney disease (CKD). This class of drugs stimulates endogenous erythropoietin production and, at the same time, improves iron absorption and mobilization of iron stores (less evident with daprodustat, vadadustat and enarodustat). Several studies have been published in the last few years showing that these agents are not inferior to standard therapy in correcting anemia associated with CKD. The efficacy of HIF-PHIs is coupled with a safety profile comparable to that of standard erythropoiesis stimulating agent (ESA) treatment. However, studies with HIF-PHIs were not long enough to definitively exclude the impact of new drugs on adverse events, such as cancer, death and possibly cardiovascular events, that usually occur after a long follow-up period. Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) recently reported the conclusions of the Controversies Conference on HIF-PHIs held in 2021. The goal of the present position paper endorsed by the Italian Society of Nephrology is to better adapt the conclusions of the latest KDIGO Conference on HIF-PHIs to the Italian context by reviewing the efficacy and safety of HIF-PHIs as well as their use in subpopulations of interest as emerged from more recent publications not discussed during the KDIGO Conference., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: Middle uremic toxins (MUTs) can cause anemia and erythropoietin hyporesponsiveness. Theranova dialyzers may improve anemia management by removing MUTs. Hence, the impact of Theranova dialyzers on erythropoietin responsiveness was studied., Methods: This exploratory single-center prospective observational study, encompassing 50 patients undergoing dialysis with either the Theranova-400 or FX80 membrane for 6 months, involved monthly tracking of hemoglobin levels, weight-adjusted erythropoiesis-stimulating agent (w-ESA) dosing, and erythropoietin resistance index (ERI), with ESA treatment decisions guided by a proprietary algorithm., Results: The groups were similar in terms of demographics and baseline laboratory test results. The median hemoglobin levels, w-ESA and ERI, were found to be similar between FX80 and Theranova-400 groups at both baseline (11.06 vs 10.57, p  = 0.808; 92.3 vs 105.2, p  = 0.838; 8.1 vs 10.48, p  = 0.876) and the end of the study (11.43 vs 11.03, p  = 0.076; 48.7 vs 71.5; 4.48 vs 6.41, p  = 0.310), respectively. There was a trend toward lower w-ESA and ERI at the end of the study compared to baseline in both groups, but the difference was non-significant., Conclusions: Based on this study of 50 patients undergoing high-flux dialysis with near-target hemoglobin levels, switching to Theranova 400 dialyzers compared to FX80 dialyzers did not show statistically significant differences in maintaining hemoglobin levels, reducing ESA dose, or lowering ERI. The non-randomized design and small sample size limit the study's power to detect true differences. Larger, randomized trials are needed to confirm findings and definitively assess Theranova 400's benefits., Competing Interests: Declaration of conflicting interestsThe author(s) declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: TS has received speaker honorariums from AstraZeneca, Amgen, Sanofi, Nobel Ilac, Baxter, Boehringer Ingelheim, Astellas, and Abdi Ibrahim-Otsuka, none of which are associated with this work.

Anemia is common in critically ill patients undergoing continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT). We investigated the impact of anemia requiring red blood cell (RBC) transfusion or erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) on patient outcomes after hospital discharge in critically ill patients with acute kidney injury (AKI) requiring CRRT. In this retrospective cohort study using the Health Insurance Review and Assessment database of South Korea, 10,923 adult patients who received CRRT for 3 days or more between 2010 and 2019 and discharged alive were included. Anemia was defined as the need for RBC transfusion or ESAs. Outcomes included cardiovascular events (CVEs) and all-cause mortality after discharge. The anemia group showed a tendency to be older with more females and had more comorbidities compared to the control group. Anemia was not associated with an increased risk of CVEs (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR]: 1.05; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.85-1.29), but was associated with an increased risk of all-cause mortality (aHR: 1.41; 95% CI 1.30-1.53). For critically ill patients with AKI requiring CRRT, anemia, defined as requirement for RBC transfusion or ESAs, may increase the long-term risk of all-cause mortality., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Anemia is the most common modifiable risk factor for postoperative morbidity and mortality. Early identification and optimal management are key to restore iron stores and ensure its resolution before surgery. Several therapies have been proposed to treat anemia in the perioperative period, such as iron supplementation and erythropoiesis-stimulating agents, though it remains unclear which is the most optimal to improve clinical outcomes. This article summarizes the most updated evidence on perioperative management of anemia and denotes differences among the international guidelines to reflect the conflicting evidence in this field and the need for further research in specific areas., Competing Interests: Disclosure D.L. Hepner: Grant/Research/Clinical Trial Support: Pharmacosmos [ERAS-driven Elective Surgery]. Consultant/Advisory Boards: Pharmacosmos [IV Iron-Associated Hypophosphatemia]. All the relevant financial relationships listed have been mitigated., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Since zinc is involved in many aspects of the hematopoietic process, zinc supplementation can reduce erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) in patients undergoing hemodialysis. However, it remains unclear whether hypoxia-inducible factor-prolyl hydroxylase inhibitors (HIF-PHIs) have similar reduction effects. HIF-PHI stabilizes HIF, which promotes hematopoiesis, although HIF-1α levels are downregulated by zinc. This study aimed to investigate the effect of zinc supplementation on the hematopoietic effect of HIF-PHI in patients undergoing hemodialysis. Thirty patients undergoing maintenance hemodialysis who underwent periods of treatment with roxadustat or darbepoetin alfa during the past 3 years were retrospectively observed. Participants who underwent periods with and without zinc supplementation were selected, with nine treated with darbepoetin alfa and nine treated with roxadustat. Similarly to the ESA responsiveness index (ERI), the hematopoietic effect of zinc supplementation was determined by the HIF-PHI responsiveness index (HRI), which was calculated by dividing the HIF-PHI dose (mg/week) by the patient's dry weight (kg) and hemoglobin level (g/L). Zinc supplementation significantly increased ERI ( p < 0.05), but no significant change was observed ( p = 0.931) in HRI. Although zinc supplementation did not significantly affect HRI, adequate zinc supplementation is required to alleviate concerns such as vascular calcification and increased serum copper during the use of HIF-PHI.

Background: Chronic inflammation, reflected by an increased blood C-reactive protein (CRP) level, is common in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and is involved in the development of renal anemia. This systematic review aims to investigate the impacts of CRP on the efficacy of hypoxia-inducible factor-prolyl hydroxylase inhibitors (HIF-PHIs) in the treatment of renal anemia in patients with CKD., Methods: We conducted a comprehensive search of electronic databases including Pubmed, Web of Science, Embase, Cochrane Library, CNKI, Wanfang, and the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP), from their inception to May 19, 2022. We systematically reviewed evidence from randomized controlled trials using HIF-PHIs for renal anemia treatment. The mean difference (MD) in changes in hemoglobin concentration (∆Hb) before and after treatment served as the meta-analysis outcome, utilizing a random-effects model. We compared groups with CRP levels greater than or equal to the upper limit of normal (ULN) and less than the ULN. Additionally, further analysis was conducted in the CRP ≥ ULN group comparing HIF-PHIs and erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESA)., Results: A total of 7 studies from 6 publications were included in the analysis. In the comparison between the CRP ≥ ULN group and the CRP < ULN group, 524 patients from 4 studies were incorporated into the analysis. All patients received roxadustat as the primary intervention. The pooled results revealed no significant difference in ΔHb between patients with CRP ≥ ULN and CRP < ULN at baseline (Mean Difference: 0.00, 95% Confidence Interval: -0.32 to 0.33, P = 0.99). Moreover, within the CRP ≥ ULN group, three studies involving 1399 patients compared the efficacy of roxadustat and erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs). The results indicated no significant difference in ΔHb between patients treated with ESAs and HIF-PHIs (Mean Difference: 0.24, 95% Confidence Interval: -0.08 to 0.56, P = 0.14). In terms of medication dosage, an increase in ESA dose over time was observed across various studies, particularly evident in the CRP ≥ ULN group, while the dose of roxadustat remains constant over time and is not influenced by the baseline levels of CRP., Conclusions: Our systematic review demonstrates that roxadustat exhibits similar efficacy across different CRP levels. Moreover, within the CRP ≥ ULN group, roxadustat can maintain efficacy comparable to ESA without the necessity for dose escalation., Trial Registration: CRD42023396704., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: Evidence for the management of moderate-to-severe postpartum anemia is limited. A randomized trial is needed; recruitment may be challenging., Study Design and Methods: Randomized pilot trial with feasibility surveys., Inclusion: hemoglobin 65-79 g/L, ≤7 days of birth, hemodynamically stable., Exclusion: ongoing heavy bleeding; already received, or contraindication to intravenous (IV)-iron or red blood cell transfusion (RBC-T). Intervention/control: IV-iron; RBC-T; or IV-iron and RBC-T., Primary Outcome: number of recruits; proportion of those approached; proportion considered potentially eligible., Secondary Outcomes: fatigue, depression, baby-feeding, and hemoglobin at 1, 6 and 12 weeks; ferritin at 6 and 12 weeks. Surveys explored attitudes to trial participation., Results: Over 16 weeks and three sites, 26/34 (76%) women approached consented to trial participation, including eight (31%) Māori women. Of those potentially eligible, 26/167 (15.6%) consented to participate. Key participation enablers were altruism and study relevance. For clinicians and stakeholders the availability of research assistance was the key barrier/enabler. Between-group rates of fatigue and depression were similar. Although underpowered to address secondary outcomes, IV-iron and RBC-T compared with RBC-T were associated with higher hemoglobin concentrations at 6 (mean difference [MD] 11.7 g/L, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.7-20.7) and 12 (MD 12.8 g/L, 95% CI 1.5-24.2) weeks, and higher ferritin concentrations at 6 weeks (MD 136.8 mcg/L, 95% CI 76.6-196.9)., Discussion: Willingness to participate supports feasibility for a future trial assessing the effectiveness of IV-iron and RBC-T for postpartum anemia. Dedicated research assistance will be critical to the success of an appropriately powered trial including women-centered outcomes., (© 2023 The Authors. Transfusion published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of AABB.)

Purpose: Anemia in cancer should be diagnosed and treated according to guideline recommendations. The implementation of ESMO and German guidelines and their effect on anemia correction was analyzed., Methods: This retrospective epidemiological study, representative for Germany, analyzed data on anemia management of cancer patients with anemia ≥ grade 2. The Guideline Adherence Score (GLAD) for diagnosis (GLAD-D) and therapy (GLAD-T) was defined as follows: 2 points for complete, 1 point for partial, 0 point for no adherence., Results: Data were analyzed for 1046 patients. Hb levels at diagnosis of anemia were 8-10 g/dL in 899 (85.9%) patients, 7-8 g/dL in 92 (8.7%), and < 7 g/dL (5.0%) in 52. Transferrin saturation was determined in 19% of patients. Four hundred fifty-six patients received RBC (43.6%), 198 (18.9%) iron replacement, 106 (10.1%) ESA, and 60 (5.7%) vitamin B12 replacement. 60.6% of patients receiving iron replacement were treated intravenously and 39.4% were treated orally. Two hundred eighty-eight (36.6%) of 785 patients receiving transfusions had no guideline-directed indication. GLAD-D was 2 in 310 patients (29.6%), 1 in 168 (16.1%), and 0 in 568 (54.3%). GLAD-T was 2 in 270 patients (25.8%), 1 in 320 patients (30.6%), and 0 in 456 patients (43.6%). Higher GLAD-D significantly correlated with higher GLAD-T (τB = 0.176, p < 0.001). GLAD-T 2 was significantly associated with greater Hb increase than GLAD-T 0/1 (p < 0.001) at 28 days (10.2 vs. 9.7 g/dL) and at 2 months (10.4 vs. 9.9 g/dL)., Conclusions: Anemia assessment is inadequate, transfusion rates too high, and iron and ESA therapy too infrequent., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05190263, date: 2022-01-13., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) have been a common treatment for anemia associated with chronic kidney disease (CKD), while 10-20 % of patients continue to suffer from persistent anemia despite receiving ESA treatments. Our previous findings suggested that intensive ESA usage can cause resistance by depleting the erythroid precursor cells. Here, we used a mechanism-based pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) model of ESAs and conducted simulations to evaluate the influence of dose regimens and other factors (such as administration route, individual PK/PD parameters, types of ESAs, and disease status) on ESA resistance with instantaneous dose adaptations in healthy populations and anemic patients. The simulated results show that instantaneous dose-adaptation can reduce ESA resistance, but up to 30 % of subjects still ended up developing ESA resistance in healthy populations. The S max is markedly higher in hypo-responders than in normal-responders, while hypo-responders possess fewer precursors and experience a faster decline compared to normal-responders. There is a ceiling effect of increasing ESA dosage to improve HGB responses and reduce ESA resistance, and the limit is lower in anemic patients compared to healthy populations. Subcutaneous administrations and ESAs with longer half-lives lead to stronger HGB responses and less resistance at equivalent doses. Taken together, this study indicates that precursor depletion contributes to ESA resistance and dose regimens can greatly influence the occurrence of ESA resistance. Furthermore, ESA treatment for patients showing ESA resistance should avoid continuously increasing doses and instead consider stimulating the renewal of precursors., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2023 American Pharmacists Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Renal anemia is one of the most common complications of chronic kidney disease (CKD). This real-life study assessed the effectiveness of methoxy polyethylene glycol-epoetin beta, a continuous erythropoietin receptor activator (C.E.R.A.), for the treatment of CKD-associated anemia in patients receiving dialysis in daily clinical practice., Methods: 247 patients receiving chronic intermitted dialysis in 26 centers in Poland with CKD-associated symptomatic anemia, ESA-naïve, and with balanced iron stores in the investigators' opinion were enrolled this real-life study. Over 12 months, the following data were collected: hemoglobin (Hb) concentration and dosage, route of administration and dosing scheme of C.E.R.A., dialysis adequacy, adverse events, iron therapy, and blood transfusions., Results: During the treatment, a Hb concentration of ≥10 g/dL was noted in 90.9% of hemodialysis patients (n = 224) and 96.0% of peritoneal dialysis patients (n = 23). At baseline, 7.8% of patients had a Hb concentration of 10-12 g/dL, which increased to 63.3% after 12 months. The median time when Hb concentration was maintained within 10-12 g/dL was 115.2 (interquartile range 49.1-188.7) days. A Hb concentration ≥12 g/dL was observed after 7 months of treatment in a maximum of 24.1% of hemodialysis patients, and 31.8% of peritoneal dialysis patients. The median time elapsed between the start of treatment and the first Hb concentration &gt;10 g/dL was 42.0 (21.0-78.2) days. C.E.R.A. was well tolerated., Conclusions: C.E.R.A. corrects CKD-associated anemia in dialysis patients, and maintains Hb levels within the recommended target range. The study also confirmed the acceptable safety profile of the drug., (© 2023 The Author(s). Published by S. Karger AG, Basel.)

Introduction: The Anemia Control Model (ACM) is a certified medical device suggesting the optimal ESA and iron dosage for patients on hemodialysis. We sought to assess the effectiveness and safety of ACM in a large cohort of hemodialysis patients., Methods: This is a retrospective study of dialysis patients treated in NephroCare centers between June 1, 2013 and December 31, 2019. We compared patients treated according to ACM suggestions and patients treated in clinics where ACM was not activated. We stratified patients belonging to the reference group by historical target achievement rates in their referral centers (tier 1: &lt;70%; tier 2: 70-80%; tier 3: &gt;80%). Groups were matched by propensity score., Results: After matching, we obtained four groups with 85,512 patient-months each. ACM had 18% higher target achievement rate, 63% smaller inappropriate ESA administration rate, and 59% smaller severe anemia risk compared to Tier 1 centers (all p &lt; 0.01). The corresponding risk ratios for ACM compared to Tier 2 centers were 1.08 (95% CI: 1.08-1.09), 0.49 (95% CI: 0.47-0.51), and 0.64 (95% CI: 0.61-0.68); for ACM compared to Tier 3 centers, 1.01 (95% CI: 1.01-1.02), 0.66 (95% CI: 0.63-0.69), and 0.94 (95% CI: 0.88-1.00), respectively. ACM was associated with statistically significant reductions in ESA dose administration., Conclusion: ACM was associated with increased hemoglobin target achievement rate, decreased inappropriate ESA usage and a decreased incidence of severe anemia among patients treated according to ACM suggestion., (© 2024 S. Karger AG, Basel.)

Introduction: The aim of the study was to explore the association between urate-lowering agents and reduced response to erythropoietin-stimulating agents in patients suffering from chronic kidney disease G5., Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional, multicenter study in Japan between April and June 2013, enrolling patients aged 20 years or older with an estimated glomerular filtration rate of ≤15 mL/min/1.73 m2. Exclusion criteria encompassed patients with a history of hemodialysis, peritoneal dialysis, or organ transplantation. The patients were categorized into four groups based on the use of urate-lowering drugs: high-dose allopurinol (&gt;50 mg/day), low-dose allopurinol (≤50 mg/day), febuxostat, and no-treatment groups. We used a multivariable logistic regression model, adjusted for covariates, to determine the odds ratio (OR) for erythropoietin hyporesponsiveness, defined by an erythropoietin resistance index (ERI) of ≥10, associated with urate-lowering drugs., Results: A total of 542 patients were included in the analysis, with 105, 36, 165, and 236 patients in the high-dose allopurinol, low-dose allopurinol, febuxostat, and no-treatment groups, respectively. The median and quartiles of ERIs were 6.3 (0, 12.2), 3.8 (0, 11.2), 3.4 (0, 9.8), and 4.8 (0, 11.2) in the high-dose allopurinol, low-dose allopurinol, febuxostat, and no-treatment groups, respectively. The multivariate regression model showed a statistically significant association between the high-dose allopurinol group and erythropoietin hyporesponsiveness, compared to the no-treatment group (OR = 1.98, 95% confidence interval: 1.10-3.57)., Conclusions: Our study suggests that the use of high-dose allopurinol exceeding the optimal dose may lead to hyporesponsiveness to erythropoiesis-stimulating agents., (© 2024 S. Karger AG, Basel.)