Search

Objective The interplay between atrial fibrillation and blood pressure (BP) is insufficiently studied. In symptomatic patients with persistent atrial fibrillation, electrical cardioversion (ECV) is often used to restore sinus rhythm. In this prospective study, we investigated how restoration of sinus rhythm affected 24-h ambulatory BP. Methods Ninety-eight patients with persistent atrial fibrillation were examined with 24-h ambulatory BP monitoring before and approximately a week after ECV. Results Sixty-two patients remained in sinus rhythm at the time of the second ambulatory BP monitoring (AF-SR group), whereas 36 patients had relapsed into atrial fibrillation (AF-AF group). In the AF-SR group, there was a significant increase in mean systolic 24-h BP (5.6 mmHg), a significant decrease in mean diastolic 24-h BP (-4.7 mmHg) and accordingly, a significant 25% (10.4 mmHg) increase in mean 24-h pulse pressure. Conclusion These findings may reflect the haemodynamic conditions that are prevalent in atrial fibrillation, ambulatory BP measurement bias in atrial fibrillation or a combination of both factors. From a clinical standpoint, our results suggest that an increased attention to BP is needed when sinus rhythm is restored, as underlying hypertension may be masked by BP changes during atrial fibrillation. From a general standpoint, it may be speculated that BP, as indicated by the relatively large difference in pulse pressure, may be inherently different in atrial fibrillation and may therefore not be interpretable in the equivalent manner as BP in sinus rhythm.

Background Many patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) experience severe or disabling symptoms and suffer from impaired quality of life (QoL). AF symptoms are often not sufficiently alleviated by current treatments. Symptom preoccupation (fear of AF episodes, hypervigilance towards cardiac symptoms, worry about complications, avoidance of physical and social activities) plays an important role in AF disability and can be targeted by cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT). This is the first randomized controlled trial (RCT) evaluating internet-delivered CBT in patients with AF. Methods We randomized patients to 10 weeks of CBT or routine care with AF-education (EDU) only. Inclusion criteria were ECG documented paroxysmal AF (≥1 episode/month); AF-care according to ESC guidelines; symptoms ≥EHRA IIb. Exclusion criteria were recent or planned ablation and severe medical or psychiatric illness. CBT was delivered over the internet by clinical psychologists. Main components were exposure to cardiac-related physical sensations and reduction of AF-related avoidance behavior. Patients were evaluated at baseline, post-CBT and 3 months (3M) post-CBT. The primary endpoint was AF-specific QoL (AFEQT) at 3M. Secondary endpoints were symptom preoccupation (CAQ), symptom frequency (SCL), symptom severity (SCL), general QoL (WHODAS) and AF-specific healthcare (AFSS) (abbreviations: see table legend). AF burden was measured by 5-day continuous ECG recording. After 3M, patients in the EDU group were offered CBT. The CBT group was further evaluated at 6M and 12M. Results 127 patients (age 65.4±8.3; 58% female; AF duration 5.6±6.1 years) were randomized to CBT (n=65) or EDU (n=62). CBT significantly improved AF-specific QoL. The AFEQT score was 62.5±16.7 at baseline and increased by 21.0 in the CBT group compared to 6.0 in the EDU group resulting in an 15.0 points improvement (95% CI: 10.1–19.8; P Conclusion Internet delivered CBT significantly improved AF-specific QoL in patients with symptomatic paroxysmal AF already receiving routine AF care. The magnitude of QoL improvement was comparable to that obtained in recent rhythm control trials and the effects were sustained over 12 months. AF-specific CBT delivered via the internet has the potential to improve the well-being of a large group of patients who do not sufficiently improve from current treatment methods. Our data support the integration of psychological evaluation and treatment in a multifactorial approach to AF management. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: Public grant(s) – National budget only. Main funding source(s): The study was supported by grants from theSwedish Research Council (2016-01379), RegionStockholm (ALF project). Change in AFEQT score over study periodBetween group improvements

BACKGROUND Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common cardiac arrhythmia in the adult population. AF is associated with a poor quality of life (QoL) and, in many patients, current medical treatments are inadequate in alleviating AF symptoms (eg, palpitations). Patients often present with symptom preoccupation in terms of symptom fear, avoidance, and control behaviors. Internet-delivered cognitive behavior therapy is effective for treating other somatic disorders but has never been evaluated in patients with AF. OBJECTIVE The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and feasibility of AF-specific internet-delivered cognitive behavior therapy. METHODS We conducted an uncontrolled pilot study in which 19 patients with symptomatic paroxysmal AF underwent internet-delivered cognitive behavior therapy. Participants completed self-assessments at pretreatment, posttreatment, and at a 6-month follow-up along with handheld electrocardiogram measurements with symptom registration. The treatment lasted 10 weeks and included exposure to physical sensations, reduction in avoidance behavior, and behavioral activation. RESULTS We observed large within-group improvements in the primary outcome, AF-specific QoL (Cohen d=0.80; Pd=1.24; P CONCLUSIONS This study presents preliminary evidence for the potential efficacy and feasibility of a novel approach in treating patients with symptomatic AF with internet-delivered cognitive behavior therapy. CLINICALTRIAL ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02694276; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02694276

Background Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common cardiac arrhythmia in the adult population. AF is associated with a poor quality of life (QoL) and, in many patients, current medical treatments are inadequate in alleviating AF symptoms (eg, palpitations). Patients often present with symptom preoccupation in terms of symptom fear, avoidance, and control behaviors. Internet-delivered cognitive behavior therapy is effective for treating other somatic disorders but has never been evaluated in patients with AF. Objective The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and feasibility of AF-specific internet-delivered cognitive behavior therapy. Methods We conducted an uncontrolled pilot study in which 19 patients with symptomatic paroxysmal AF underwent internet-delivered cognitive behavior therapy. Participants completed self-assessments at pretreatment, posttreatment, and at a 6-month follow-up along with handheld electrocardiogram measurements with symptom registration. The treatment lasted 10 weeks and included exposure to physical sensations, reduction in avoidance behavior, and behavioral activation. Results We observed large within-group improvements in the primary outcome, AF-specific QoL (Cohen d=0.80; P Conclusions This study presents preliminary evidence for the potential efficacy and feasibility of a novel approach in treating patients with symptomatic AF with internet-delivered cognitive behavior therapy. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02694276; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02694276

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common cardiac arrhythmia. Patients often experience a range of symptoms resulting in a markedly reduced quality of life, and commonly show symptom preoccupation in terms of avoidance and control behaviors. Cognitive behavior therapy (CBT) has been shown to improve symptom burden and quality of life in other somatic disorders, but has never been evaluated in patients with AF. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the potential efficacy and feasibility of an AF-specific CBT protocol in an uncontrolled pilot study. The study included 19 patients with symptomatic paroxysmal (intermittent) atrial fibrillation who were assessed pre- and posttreatment and at 6-month follow-up. The CBT lasted 10 weeks and included exposure to physical sensations similar to AF symptoms, exposure to avoided situations or activities, and behavioral activation. We observed large within-group improvements on the primary outcome AF-specific quality of life measurement AFEQT posttreatment (Cohen's d = 1.54; p < . 001) and at 6-month follow-up (d = 1.15; p < . 001). We also observed improvements in self-reported frequency and severity of AF symptoms. All participants completed the treatment and treatment satisfaction was high. This study demonstrates the potential efficacy and feasibility of a novel CBT approach to reduce symptoms and increase quality of life in AF patients.