Search

Our purpose was to report 5-year efficacy and toxicity of intraprostatic lesion boosting using standard and hypofractionated radiation therapy.DELINEATE (ISRCTN 04483921) is a single center phase 2 multicohort study including standardly fractionated (cohort A: 74 Gy/37F to prostate and seminal vesicles [PSV]; cohort C 74 Gy/37F to PSV plus 60 Gy/37F to pelvic lymph nodes) and moderately hypofractionated (cohort B: 60 Gy/20F to PSV) prostate intensity-modulated radiation therapy patients with National Comprehensive Cancer Network intermediate/high-risk disease. Patients received an integrated boost of 82 Gy (cohorts A and C) or 67 Gy (cohort B) to multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging identified lesion(s). Primary endpoint was late Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity at 1 year. Secondary endpoints were acute and late toxicity (clinician and patient reported) and freedom from biochemical/clinical failure at 5 years.Two hundred and sixty-five men were recruited and 256 were treated (55 cohort A, 153 cohort B, and 48 cohort C). Median follow-up for each cohort was5 years. Cumulative late RTOG grade 2+ GI toxicity at 1 year was 3.6% (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.9%-13.8%) (cohort A), 7.2% (95% CI, 4%-12.6%) (cohort B), and 8.4% (95% CI, 3.2%-20.8%) (cohort C). Cumulative late RTOG grade 2+ GI toxicity to 5 years was 12.8% (95% CI, 6.3%-25.1%) (cohort A), 14.6% (95% CI, 9.9%-21.4%) (cohort B), and 20.7% (95% CI, 11.2%-36.2%) (cohort C). Cumulative RTOG grade 2+ genitourinary toxicity to 5 years was 12.9% (95% CI, 6.4%-25.2%) (cohort A), 18.2% (95% CI, 12.8%-25.4%) (cohort B), and 18.2% (95% CI, 9.5%-33.2%) (cohort C). Five-year freedom from biochemical/clinical failure was 98.2% (95% CI, 87.8%-99.7%) (cohort A), 96.7% (95% CI, 91.3%- 98.8%) (cohort B), and 95.1% (95% CI, 81.6-98.7%) (cohort C).The DELINEATE trial has shown safety, tolerability, and feasibility of focal boosting in 20 or 37 fractions. Efficacy results indicate a low chance of prostate cancer recurrence 5 years after radiation therapy. Evidence from ongoing phase 3 randomized trials is awaited.

Radiation therapy is the key treatment for locally advanced cervical cancer. Organ motion presents a challenge to accurate targeting of external beam radiation therapy. The plan-of-the-day (PotD) adaptive approach is therefore an attractive option. We present our experience and the procedural steps required to implement PotD for cervix cancer.We reviewed relevant studies on organ motion and adaptive radiation therapy identified through a literature search and cross referencing. These included 10 dosimetric and 3 quality of life studies directly assessing the PotD approach to radiation therapy in cervix cancer.Studies show improvements in target coverage and reduction of dose received by normal tissues and suggest improved toxicity. Clinical implementation of PotD has been slow because of a number of difficulties and uncertainties, which we discuss with the aim of helping teams to implement PotD at their center.The PotD approach improves dosimetry and may improve toxicity. We describe a framework to assist with practical implementation.

PURPOSE: Hypofractionated radiation therapy can be used to treat patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer unable to have radical therapy. Toxicity is a key concern, but adaptive plan-of the day (POD) image-guided radiation therapy delivery could improve outcomes by minimizing the volume of normal tissue irradiated. The HYBRID trial assessed the multicenter implementation, safety, and efficacy of this strategy.METHODS: HYBRID is a Phase II randomized trial that was conducted at 14 UK hospitals. Patients with T2-T4aN0M0 muscle-invasive bladder cancer unsuitable for radical therapy received 36 Gy in 6 weekly fractions, randomized (1:1) to standard planning (SP) or adaptive planning (AP) using a minimization algorithm. For AP, a pretreatment cone beam computed tomography (CT) was used to select the POD from 3 plans (small, medium, and large). Follow-up included standard cystoscopic, radiologic, and clinical assessments. The primary endpoint was nongenitourinary Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade ≥ 3 (≥G3) toxicity within 3 months of radiation therapy. A noncomparative single stage design aimed to exclude ≥30% toxicity rate in each planning group in patients who received ≥1 fraction of radiation therapy. Local control at 3-months (both groups combined) was a key secondary endpoint.RESULTS: Between April 15, 2014, and August 10, 2016, 65 patients were enrolled (SP, n = 32; AP, n = 33). The median follow-up time was 38.8 months (interquartile range [IQR], 36.8-51.3). The median age was 85 years (IQR, 81-89); 68% of participants (44 of 65) were male; and 98% of participants had grade 3 urothelial cancer. In 63 evaluable participants, CTCAE ≥G3 nongenitourinary toxicity rates were 6% (2 of 33; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.7%-20.2%) for the AP group and 13% (4 of 30; 95% CI, 3.8%-30.7%) for the SP group. Disease was present in 9/48 participants assessed at 3 months, giving a local control rate of 81.3% (95% CI, 67.4%-91.1%).CONCLUSIONS: POD adaptive radiation therapy was successfully implemented across multiple centers. Weekly ultrahypofractionated 36 Gy/6 fraction radiation therapy is safe and provides good local control rates in this older patient population.

Introduction Pelvic lymph nodes move independently to the prostate. When delivering radiotherapy to prostate and pelvic lymph nodes, daily inter- and intra-fraction anatomical changes need to be accounted for. Planning target volume (PTV) margins, grown from the pelvic lymph node clinical target volume need to be determined, to account for this variation in position. Methods Twenty patients who had daily online image guided radiotherapy to prostate and pelvic lymph nodes between April and December 2018 were selected. Ten pre-treatment verification images using cone beam CT from each patient were registered to pelvic bone anatomy, prostate soft tissue or fiducial markers and pelvic lymph node soft tissue to assess the accuracy of treatment delivery. Population systematic and random errors and PTV margins were calculated. Results PTV margins of 0.4 cm, 0.4 cm and 0.7 cm left–right (LR), superior–inferior (SI) and anterior–posterior (AP) respectively were derived for the pelvic lymph nodes when registering to prostate. PTV margins of 0.3 cm, 0.2 cm and 0.4 cm LR, SI and AP respectively were derived for the pelvic lymph nodes when registering to bone. There was a posterior systematic shift of the prostate during the treatment course. Conclusion There is differential motion of pelvic lymph nodes to prostate and in the era of prostate and pelvic radiotherapy for patients with node positive prostate cancer; there is increasing importance in the accuracy of dose delivery to the involved lymph node. Hence, this group of patients may benefit from personalised radiotherapy PTV margins, especially if the involved pelvic lymph node is within the anterior part of the clinical target volume. Implications for practice Optimisation of dose delivery to the pelvic lymph nodes when prioritising the prostate in prostate and pelvic lymph node image guided radiotherapy.

Background and purpose Transperineal ultrasound (TPUS) is used clinically for directly assessing prostate motion. Factors affecting accuracy and precision in TPUS motion estimation must be assessed to realise its full potential. Methods and materials Patients were imaged using volumetric TPUS during the Clarity-Pro trial (NCT02388308). Prostate motion was measured online at patient set-up and offline by experienced observers. Cone beam CT with markers was used as a comparator and observer performance was also quantified. The influence of different clinical factors was examined to establish specific recommendations towards efficacious ultrasound guided radiotherapy. Results From 330 fractions in 22 patients, offline observer random errors were 1.5 mm, 1.3 mm, 1.9 mm (left–right, superior-inferior, anteroposterior respectively). Errors increased in fractions exhibiting poor image quality to 3.3 mm, 3.3 mm and 6.8 mm. Poor image quality was associated with inconsistent probe placement, large anatomical changes and unfavourable imaging conditions within the patient. Online matching exhibited increased observer errors of: 3.2 mm, 2.9 mm and 4.7 mm. Four patients exhibited large systematic residual errors, of which three had poor quality images. Patient habitus showed no correlation with observer error, residual error, or image quality. Conclusions TPUS offers the unique potential to directly assess inter- and intra-fraction motion on conventional linacs. Inconsistent image quality, inexperienced operators and the pressures of the clinical environment may degrade precision and accuracy. Experienced operators are essential and cross-centre standards for training and QA should be established that build upon current guidance. Greater use of automation technologies may further minimise uncertainties.

Highlights • VMAT in combination with voluntary deep inspiratory breath hold is a feasible alternative to machine operated techniques. • Voluntary deep inspiration breath hold (vDIBH) can be used in combination with wax bolus. • A novel low cost couch mounted laser offers a reliable method for monitoring vDIBH. • Intrafraction and interfraction reproducibility is equivalent between vDIBH and ABC™ breath hold in combination with VMAT with or without wax bolus., Background Deep-inspiration breath-hold (DIBH) reduces radiation dose to the heart in patients undergoing locoregional breast radiotherapy. In the context of tangential irradiation of the breast/ chest wall, a voluntary breath hold (vDIBH) technique has been shown to be as reproducible as a machine-assisted breath hold technique using the active breathing co-ordinator (ABC™, Elekta, Crawley, UK, ABC_DIBH). This study compares set-up reproducibility for vDIBH versus ABC_DIBH in patients undergoing volumetric-modulated arc radiotherapy (VMAT) for breast cancer, both with and without wax bolus. Method Patients with breast cancer requiring pan regional lymph node VMAT +/− wax bolus in breath-hold were CT scanned in vDIBH and ABC_DIBH. Patients were randomised to receive one technique for fractions 1–7 and the other for fractions 8–15. Daily cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) was performed and registered to planning-CT using bony anatomy. Within-patient comparisons of mean daily chest wall position were made using a paired t-test. Population, systematic (∑) and random errors (α) were estimated. Intrafraction reproducibility was assessed by comparing chest wall position and diaphragm movement between consecutive breath holds on CBCT. Results 16 patients were recruited. All completed treatment with both techniques (9 patients with wax bolus, 7 patients without). CBCT derived ∑ were 2.1–6.4 mm (ABC_DIBH) and 2.1–4.9 mm (vDIBH), α were 1.7–2.6 mm (ABC_DIBH) and 2.2–2.7 mm (vDIBH) and mean daily chest wall displacements (MD) were 0.0–1.5 mm (ABC_DIBH) and -0.1–1.6 vDIBH (all p non-significant). Chest wall and diaphragm position was equivalent between consecutive breath holds in ABC and vDIBH (median difference 1.0 mm and 0.8 mm respectively, non p significant) demonstrating equivalent intrafraction reproducibility. Conclusion This study demonstrates that a simple voluntary breath hold technique is feasible in combination with VMAT (+/− bolus) and is as reproducible as ABC_DIBH with VMAT for the irradiation of the breast and axillary and IMC lymph nodes in breast cancer patients.

Highlights • Prostate and oligometastases patients were most common first sites treated. • Conventional professional roles and responsibilities will evolve in the future. • Thresholds for on-line adaptive radiotherapy remain undefined., Background and purpose The uptake of new technologies has varied internationally and there have often been barriers to implementation. On-line adaptive radiotherapy (ART) promises to improve patient outcome. This survey focuses on the implementation phase of delivering ART and professional roles and responsibilities currently involved in the workflow and changes which may be expected in the future. Materials and methods A 38 question survey included aspects on current practice; professional responsibilities; benefits and barriers; and decision making and responsibilities. For the purposes of the questionnaire and paper, ART was considered where tumour and /or organs at risk were contoured and re-planning was performed on-line. The questionnaire was electronically distributed via radiotherapy networks. Results Nineteen international responses were received. Europe (n = 11), United States of America (n = 4); Canada (n = 2), Australia (n = 1) and Hong Kong (n = 1). The majority of centres started using ART in either 2018 (n = 7) or 2019 (n = 6). Four centres started treating with ART between 2015 and 2017, and the first was in 2014. Centres initially treated prostate and oligometastases patients, expanding to treat prostate, oligometastases, pancreas and rectum. The majority of centres were working in conventional roles, however moving towards radiographers taking more responsibility in contouring organs at risk (OAR), target and dosimetry. The three most important criteria chosen by medical doctors to determine if ART should be used were overall gross anatomy changes of target and OAR, target not covered by planning target volume (PTV) and OAR close to the high dose area. There was no clear consensus on the minimum improvement in dose to target or reduction in dose to OAR to warrant adaption. Conclusion On-line ART has been implemented successfully internationally. Initial practice maintains conventional professional roles and responsibilities, however there is trend to changing roles for the future. There is little consensus regarding the triggers of adaption.

Highlights • First report of online MR-guided radiotherapy of liver metastases at a high-field MR-Linac. • Online MR-guided SBRT facilitates marker-less treatment of liver metastases. • Nine of ten tumors were visible in the online workflow. • No treatment had to be interrupted on patient request., Introduction Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is an established ablative treatment for liver tumors with excellent local control rates. Magnetic resonance imaging guided radiotherapy (MRgRT) provides superior soft tissue contrast and may therefore facilitate a marker-less liver SBRT workflow. The goal of the present study was to investigate feasibility, workflow parameters, toxicity and patient acceptance of MRgSBRT on a 1.5 T MR-Linac. Methods Ten consecutive patients with liver metastases treated on a 1.5 T MR-Linac were included in this prospective trial. Tumor delineation was performed on four-dimensional computed tomography scans and both exhale triggered and free-breathing T2 MRI scans from the MR-Linac. An internal target volume based approach was applied. Organ at risk constraints were based on the UKSABR guidelines (Version 6.1). Patient acceptance regarding device specific aspects was assessed and toxicity was scored according to the common toxicity criteria of adverse events, version 5. Results Nine of ten tumors were clearly visible on the 1.5 T MR-Linac. No patient had fiducial markers placed for treatment. All patients were treated with three or five fractions. Median dose to 98% of the gross tumor volume was 38.5 Gy. The median time from “patient identity check” until “beam-off” was 31 min. Median beam on time was 9.6 min. Online MRgRT was well accepted in general and no treatment had to be interrupted on patient request. No event of symptomatic radiation induced liver disease was observed after a median follow-up of ten month (range 3–17 months). Conclusion Our early experience suggests that online 1.5 T MRgSBRT of liver metastases represents a promising new non-invasive marker-free treatment modality based on high image quality, clinically reasonable in-room times and high patient acceptance. Further studies are necessary to assess clinical outcome, to validate advanced motion management and to explore the benefit of online response adaptive liver SBRT.

Highlights • Automated matching improves accuracy and precision of ultrasound guided radiotherapy. • Image registration software lowers setup errors and sonography training requirements. • Spatial regularisation improves registration algorithm performance., Background and purpose Daily image guidance is standard care for prostate radiotherapy. Innovations which improve the accuracy and efficiency of ultrasound guidance are needed, particularly with respect to reducing interobserver variation. This study explores automation tools for this purpose, demonstrated on the Elekta Clarity Autoscan®. The study was conducted as part of the Clarity-Pro trial (NCT02388308). Materials and methods Ultrasound scan volumes were collected from 32 patients. Prostate matches were performed using two proposed workflows and the results compared with Clarity’s proprietary software. Gold standard matches derived from manually localised landmarks provided a reference. The two workflows incorporated a custom 3D image registration algorithm, which was benchmarked against a third-party application (Elastix). Results Significant reductions in match errors were reported from both workflows compared to standard protocol. Median (IQR) absolute errors in the left–right, anteroposterior and craniocaudal axes were lowest for the Manually Initiated workflow: 0.7(1.0) mm, 0.7(0.9) mm, 0.6(0.9) mm compared to 1.0(1.7) mm, 0.9(1.4) mm, 0.9(1.2) mm for Clarity. Median interobserver variation was ≪0.01 mm in all axes for both workflows compared to 2.2 mm, 1.7 mm, 1.5 mm for Clarity in left–right, anteroposterior and craniocaudal axes. Mean matching times was also reduced to 43 s from 152 s for Clarity. Inexperienced users of the proposed workflows attained better match precision than experienced users on Clarity. Conclusion Automated image registration with effective input and verification steps should increase the efficacy of interfraction ultrasound guidance compared to the current commercially available tools.

446 Background: The bladder is a mobile, deformable structure which makes radiotherapy (RT) delivery challenging. Plan of the day (POD) adaptive image guided RT and tumour boost dose escalation can optimise treatment. We aimed to define a feasible, safe schedule for muscle invasive bladder cancer (BC) using these techniques. Methods: RAIDER (ISRCTN 26779187) is a 3-arm, international phase II trial. Participants (pts) had unifocal T2-T4a urothelial BC and were randomized (1:1:2) to: standard whole bladder RT (WBRT), standard dose adaptive tumour focused RT (SART) or dose escalated adaptive tumour boost RT (DART). Two fractionation (f) schedules recruited independently. WBRT and SART dose was 64Gy/32f or 55Gy/20f and DART was 70Gy/32f or 60Gy/20f. For SART and DART, POD (small, medium, large) was chosen daily. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) and concomitant radiosensitising therapy (CTh) were permitted. Primary endpoint is proportion of pts with RT related CTCAE grade≥3 (G≥3) toxicity 6-18 months (m) after RT. A non-comparative design to rule out >20% G≥3 toxicity in DART pts required 57 evaluable DART pts in each fractionation cohort (90% power, 5% 1-sided alpha). Adverse events (AE) are treatment emergent with RT relatedness assessed blind to treatment allocation. In each fractionation cohort, toxicity analysis is by treatment received in the evaluable population (pts with at ≥1 toxicity assessment between 6-18m). 3m local control was assessed by cystoscopic biopsy. Cancer outcomes are analysed by intention-to-treat with fractionation cohorts combined. Results: 345 pts were randomised (Oct 2015 - Apr 2020): 46/41 WBRT, 46/41 SART and 90/81 DART pts in 32f/20f cohorts respectively. Baseline characteristics for 32f/20f were median age 73 years (IQR 67, 79)/ 72 (67, 79); 83%/ 78% T2; 46%/ 52% had NAC and 71%/ 70% CTh. Median follow-up was 32f: 38.2m (IQR 26.2, 50.2), 20f: 42.1m (35.6, 50.1). 3588/6222 (58%) fractions delivered to SART and DART pts used small or large POD. Late toxicity outcomes are shown in table. RT related G≥3 in 20f DART was 1/58 (90% CI 0.1, 7.9) and in 32f DART was 0/57. 3m local control was achieved in 44/51 (86%) WBRT, 45/53 (85%) SART and 82/92(89%) DART. 2 year survival was 79% (95% CI: 69, 86) WBRT, 74% (63, 82) SART and 80% (73, 85) DART. Conclusions: Late G≥3 toxicity was low in all treatment groups. 20f and 32f DART was safe and feasible to deliver with toxicity rates below predefined thresholds. Local control for image guided (chemo)RT was good. CTCAE G≥3 and G≥2 treatment emergent toxicity 6-18m after RT. Clinical trial information: 26779187 . [Table: see text]

Hybrid magnetic resonance (MR)-guided linear accelerators represent a new horizon in the field of radiation oncology. By harnessing the favorable combination of on-board MR-imaging with the possibility to daily recalculate the treatment plan based on real-time anatomy, the accuracy in target and organs-at-risk identification is expected to be improved, with the aim to provide the best tailored treatment. To date, two main MR-linac hybrid machines are available, Elekta Unity and Viewray MRIdian. Of note, compared to conventional linacs, these devices raise practical issues due to the positioning phase for the need to include the coil in the immobilization procedure and in order to perform the best reproducible positioning, also in light of the potentially longer treatment time. Given the relative novelty of this technology, there are few literature data regarding the procedures and the workflows for patient positioning and immobilization for MR-guided daily adaptive radiotherapy. In the present narrative review, we resume the currently available literature and provide an overview of the positioning and setup procedures for all the anatomical districts for hybrid MR-linac systems. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13014-021-01910-6.

Highlights • Questionnaires are important tools in assessing the tolerability of new technology. • Patient reported experience of treatment on the MR-Linac is consistently high. • The MR-Linac questionnaire has been validated as relevant and appropriate for use., Introduction With the implementation of new radiotherapy technology, it is imperative that patient experience is investigated alongside efficacy and outcomes. This paper presents the development of a specifically designed validated questionnaire and a first report of international multi-institutional preliminary patient experience of MRI-guided adaptive radiotherapy (MRgART) on the 1.5 T MR-Linac (MRL). Methods A patient experience questionnaire was developed and validated before being distributed to the Elekta MRL Consortium, to gather first patient-reported experience from participating centres worldwide. The final version of the questionnaire contains 18 questions covering a range of themes and was scored on a Likert scale of 0–3. Responses were post-processed so that a score of 0 represents a negative response and 3 represents the most favourable response. These results were analysed for patient-reported experience of treatment on the MRL. Results were also analysed for internal consistency of the questionnaire using Chronbach’s Alpha and the questionnaire contents were validated for relevance using content validity indexes (CVI). Results 170 responses were received from five centres, representing patients with a wide range of tumour treatment sites from four different countries. MRgART was well tolerated with an 84% favourable response across all questions and respondents. When analysed by theme, all reported the highest percentage of results in the favourable categories (2 and 3). Internal consistency in the questionnaire was high (Cronbach’s α = 0.8) and the item-level CVI for each question was 0.78 or above and the Scale-level CVI was 0.93, representing relevant content. Conclusion The developed questionnaire has been validated as relevant and appropriate for use in reporting experience of patients undergoing treatment on the MRL. The overall patient-reported experience and satisfaction from multiple centres within the Elekta MRL Consortium was consistently high. These results can reinforce user confidence in continuing to expand and develop MRL use in adaptive radiotherapy.

Aims Adaptive radiotherapy (ART) is an emerging advanced treatment option for bladder cancer patients. Therapeutic radiographers (RTTs) are central to the successful delivery of this treatment. The purpose of this work was to evaluate the image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT) and ART experience of RTTs before participating in the RAIDER trial. A plan of the day (PoD) quality assurance programme was then implemented. Finally, the post-trial experience of RTTs was evaluated, together with the impact of trial quality assurance participation on their routine practice. Materials and methods A pre-trial questionnaire to assess the experience of the RTT staff group in IGRT and ART in bladder cancer was sent to each centre. Responses were grouped according to experience. The PoD quality assurance programme was implemented, and the RAIDER trial commenced. During stage 1 of the trial, RTTs reported difficulties in delivering PoD and the quality assurance programme was updated accordingly. A follow-up questionnaire was sent assessing experience in IGRT and ART post-trial. Any changes in routine practice were also recorded. Results The experience of RTTs in IGRT and ART pre-trial varied. For centres deemed to have RTTs with more experience, the initial PoD quality assurance programme was streamlined. For RTTs without ART experience, the full quality assurance programme was implemented, of which 508 RTTs completed. The quality assurance programme was updated (as the trial recruited) and it was mandated that at least one representative RTT (regardless of pre-trial experience) participated in the update in real-time. The purpose of the updated quality assurance programme was to provide further support to RTTs in delivering a complex treatment. Engagement with the updated quality assurance programme was high, with RTTs in 24/33 centres participating in the real-time online workshop. All 33 UK centres reported all RTTs reviewed the updated training offline. Post-trial, the RTTs' experience in IGRT and ART was increased. Conclusion Overall, 508 RTTs undertook the PoD quality assurance programme. There was a high engagement of RTTs in the PoD quality assurance programme and trial. RTTs increased their experience in IGRT and ART and subsequently updated their practice for bladder cancer and other treatment sites.

Online magnetic resonance-guided radiotherapy (oMRgRT) represents one of the most innovative applications of current image-guided radiation therapy (IGRT). The revolutionary concept of oMRgRT systems is the ability to acquire MR images for adaptive treatment planning and also online imaging during treatment delivery. The daily adaptive planning strategies allow to improve targeting accuracy while avoiding critical structures. This ESTRO-ACROP recommendation aims to provide an overview of available systems and guidance for best practice in the implementation phase of hybrid MR-linac systems. Unlike the implementation of other radiotherapy techniques, oMRgRT adds the MR environment to the daily practice of radiotherapy, which might be a new experience for many centers. New issues and challenges that need to be thoroughly explored before starting clinical treatments will be highlighted.

Highlights • Reusable water bottles reduce the amount of single-use plastic cups used in a radiotherapy department. • Reusable bottles are an effective way of helping patients prepare a full bladder for radiotherapy. • Reusable bottles are a helpful aid for maintaining hydration levels., More than 60,000 plastic cups were used annually for bladder preparation in one radiotherapy centre. As an alternative, patients were provided with a specifically designed reusable water bottle, aiming to reduce waste and improve bladder filling compliance. Cup usage and bladder volume at treatment were calculated pre- and post-implementation. Bladder volume was measured as a percentage of the planned volume and grouped for analysis. Cup usage halved from 12,000 cups to 6000 cups. Percentage of bladder volumes in the optimal group increased from 47% to 54%. The introduction of water bottles reduced plastic cup usage and increased bladder filling compliance.

Introduction Online MRI guided adaptive radiotherapy (MRIgRT) is resource intensive. To maintain and increase uptake traditional roles and responsibilities may need refining. This novel study aims to provide an in-depth understanding and subsequent impact of the roles required to deliver on-line adaptive MRIgRT by exploring the current skills and knowledge of radiographers. Method A purposive sampling approach was used to invite radiographers, clinicians and physicists from centres with experience of MRIgRT to participate. Focus Group Interviews were conducted with two facilitators using a semi-structure interview guide (Appendix 1). Four researchers independently familiarised themselves and coded the data using framework analysis. A consensus thematic framework of ptive Radiotherapy codes and categories was agreed and systematically applied. Results Thirty participants took part (Radiographers: N = 18, Physicists: N = 9 and Clinicians: N = 3). Three key themes were identified: ‘Current MRIgRT’, ‘Training’ and ‘Future Practice’. Current MRIgRT identified a variation in radiographers' roles and responsibilities with pathways ranging from radiographer-led, clinician-light-led and MDT-led. The consensus was to move towards radiographer-led with the need to have a robust on-call service heavily emphasised. Training highlighted the breadth of knowledge required by radiographers including MRI, contouring, planning and dosimetry, and treatment experience. Debate was presented over timing and length of training required. Future Practice identified the need to have radiographers solely deliver MRIgRT, to reduce staff present which was seen as a main driver, and time and resources to train radiographers seen as the main barriers. Conclusion Radiographer-led MRIgRT is an exciting development because of the potential radiographer role development. A national training framework created collaboratively with all stakeholders and professions involved would ensure consistency in skills and knowledge. Implications for practice Role development and changes in education for therapeutic radiographers.

Radiotherapy for cancer is an effective treatment but requires precise delivery. Patients are required to remain still in the same position during procedure which may be uncomfortable. This combined with high anxiety experienced by patients, and feelings of isolation, have indicated a need for comfort interventions. Care conveyed through empathetic touch promotes comfort, individual attention and presence and provides both psychological and physical comfort at the same time. Evidence in nursing and care literature showed that empathetic touch interventions have a significant role in promoting comfort, facilitating communication between care recipients and caregivers. However, the application of empathetic touch interventions may be challenging to administer due to the safety concern in the radiotherapy environment. The emergence of haptic technologies that enable the communication of touch remotely may have a potential to fill this gap. We take inspiration from both clinical empathetic touch in radiotherapy practice, as well as affective haptic technologies to envision the opportunities for haptic technologies as a complimentary comfort intervention to supplement human empathetic touch during radiotherapy.

IntroductionPatients with muscle invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) who are unfit and unsuitable for standard radical treatment with cystectomy or daily radiotherapy present a large unmet clinical need. Untreated, they suffer high cancer specific mortality and risk significant disease-related local symptoms. Hypofractionated radiotherapy (delivering higher doses in fewer fractions/visits) is a potential treatment solution but could be compromised by the mobile nature of the bladder, resulting in target misses in a significant proportion of fractions. Adaptive ‘plan of the day’ image-guided radiotherapy delivery may improve the precision and accuracy of treatment. We aim to demonstrate within a randomised multicentre phase II trial feasibility of plan of the day hypofractionated bladder radiotherapy delivery with acceptable rates of toxicity.Methods and analysisPatients with T2-T4aN0M0 MIBC receiving 36 Gy in 6-weekly fractions are randomised (1:1) between treatment delivered using a single-standard plan or adaptive radiotherapy using a library of three plans (small, medium and large). A cone beam CT taken prior to each treatment is used to visualise the anatomy and select the most appropriate plan depending on the bladder shape and size. A comprehensive radiotherapy quality assurance programme has been instituted to ensure standardisation of radiotherapy planning and delivery. The primary endpoint is to exclude >30% acute grade >3 non-genitourinary toxicity at 3 months for adaptive radiotherapy in patients who received >1 fraction (p0=0.7, p1=0.9, α=0.05, β=0.2). Secondary endpoints include local disease control, symptom control, late toxicity, overall survival, patient-reported outcomes and proportion of fractions benefiting from adaptive planning. Target recruitment is 62 patients.Ethics and disseminationThe trial is approved by the London-Surrey Borders Research Ethics Committee (13/LO/1350). The results will be disseminated via peer-reviewed scientific journals, conference presentations and submission to regulatory authorities.Trial registration numberNCT01810757.

Effective transperineal ultrasound image guidance in prostate external beam radiotherapy requires consistent alignment between probe and prostate at each session during patient set-up. Probe placement and ultrasound image interpretation are manual tasks contingent upon operator skill, leading to interoperator uncertainties that degrade radiotherapy precision. We demonstrate a method for ensuring accurate probe placement through joint classification of images and probe position data. Using a multi-input multi-task algorithm, spatial coordinate data from an optically tracked ultrasound probe is combined with an image classifier using a recurrent neural network to generate two sets of predictions in real-time. The first set identifies relevant prostate anatomy visible in the field of view using the classes: outside prostate, prostate periphery, prostate centre. The second set recommends a probe angular adjustment to achieve alignment between the probe and prostate centre with the classes: move left, move right, stop. The algorithm was trained and tested on 9,743 clinical images from 61 treatment sessions across 32 patients. We evaluated classification accuracy against class labels derived from three experienced observers at 2/3 and 3/3 agreement thresholds. For images with unanimous consensus between observers, anatomical classification accuracy was 97.2% and probe adjustment accuracy was 94.9%. The algorithm identified optimal probe alignment within a mean (standard deviation) range of 3.7° (1.2°) from angle labels with full observer consensus, comparable to the 2.8° (2.6°) mean interobserver range. We propose such an algorithm could assist radiotherapy practitioners with limited experience of ultrasound image interpretation by providing effective real-time feedback during patient set-up.

ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to elicit the views of relevant stakeholders on the design of a device using simulated affective touch to reduce procedural anxiety surrounding radiotherapy and imaging.DesignThis qualitative study collected data from focus groups which were then analysed using inductive thematic analysis in line with Braun and Clarke’s methods.Participants and settingTwenty patients and carers were recruited, as well as 10 healthcare practitioners involved in either delivering radiotherapy or imaging procedures.ResultsPatients, carers and healthcare practitioners agreed on some aspects of the device design, such as ensuring the device is warm and flexible in where it can be used on the body. However, patient and healthcare practitioner cohorts had at times differing viewpoints. For example, healthcare practitioners provided professional perspectives and required easy cleaning of the device. Meanwhile patients focused on anxiety-relieving factors, such as the tactile sensation of the device being either a vibration or pulsation. There was no consensus on who should control the device.ConclusionsThe desired features of a simulated affective touch device have been investigated. Different priorities of patients and their carers and healthcare practitioners were evident. Any design must incorporate such features as to appease both groups. Areas where no consensus was reached could be further explored, alongside including further patient and public involvement in the form of a project advisory group.

Aims To evaluate the feasibility and heart-sparing ability of the voluntary breath-hold (VBH) technique in a multicentre setting. Materials and methods Patients were recruited from 10 UK centres. Following surgery for early left breast cancer, patients with any heart inside the 50% isodose from a standard free-breathing tangential field treatment plan underwent a second planning computed tomography (CT) scan using the VBH technique. A separate treatment plan was prepared on the VBH CT scan and used for treatment. The mean heart, left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD) and lung doses were calculated. Daily electronic portal imaging (EPI) was carried out and scanning/treatment times were recorded. The primary end point was the percentage of patients achieving a reduction in mean heart dose with VBH. Population systematic (Σ) and random errors (σ) were estimated. Within-patient comparisons between techniques used Wilcoxon signed-rank tests. Results In total, 101 patients were recruited during 2014. Primary end point data were available for 93 patients, 88 (95%) of whom achieved a reduction in mean heart dose with VBH. Mean cardiac doses (Gy) for free-breathing and VBH techniques, respectively, were: heart 1.8 and 1.1, LAD 12.1 and 5.4, maximum LAD 35.4 and 24.1 (all P

Highlights • MR-guided radiotherapy for prostate cancer can be delivered using a high filed MR-linac. • Comparison of estimated delivered dose between MR-guided adapted radiotherapy and conventional C-arm techniques. • MR-guided adaptive radiotherapy demonstrates improved target coverage for a subset of prostate cancer patients., Introduction MR-guided adapted radiotherapy (MRgART) using a high field MR-linac has recently become available. We report the estimated delivered fractional dose of the first five prostate cancer patients treated at our centre using MRgART and compare this to C-Arm linac daily Image Guided Radiotherapy (IGRT). Methods Patients were treated using adapted treatment plans shaped to their daily anatomy. The treatments were recalculated on an MR image acquired immediately prior to treatment delivery in order to estimate the delivered fractional dose. C-arm linac non-adapted VMAT treatment plans were recalculated on the same MR images to estimate the fractional dose that would have been delivered using conventional radiotherapy techniques using a daily IGRT protocol. Results 95% and 93% of mandatory target coverage objectives and organ at risk dose constraints were achieved by MRgART and C-arm linac delivered dose estimates, respectively. Both delivery techniques were estimated to have achieved 98% of mandatory Organ At Risk (OAR) dose constraints whereas for the target clinical goals, 86% and 80% were achieved by MRgART and C-arm linac delivered dose estimates. Conclusions Prostate MRgART can be delivered using the a high field MR-linac. Radiotherapy performed on a C-arm linac offers a good solution for prostate cancer patients who present with favourable anatomy at the time of reference imaging and demonstrate stable anatomy throughout the course of their treatment. For patients with critical OARs abutting target volumes on their reference image we have demonstrated the potential for a target dose coverage improvement for MRgART compared to C-arm linac treatment.

Objectives The aim of this review was to search existing literature to identify comfort interventions that can be used to assist an adult patient to undergo complex radiotherapy requiring positional stability for periods greater than 10 min. The objectives of this review were to; 1) identify comfort interventions used for clinical procedures that involve sustained inactivity similar to radiotherapy; 2) define characteristics of comfort interventions for future practice; and 3) determine the effectiveness of identified comfort interventions. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and meta-analyses statement and the Template-for-Intervention-Description-and Replication guide were used. Key findings The literature search was performed using PICO criteria with five databases (AMED, CINAHL EMBASE, MEDLINE, PsycINFO) identifying 5269 titles. After screening, 46 randomised controlled trials met the inclusion criteria. Thirteen interventions were reported and were grouped into four categories: Audio–visual, Psychological, Physical, and Other interventions (education/information and aromatherapy). The majority of aromatherapy, one audio–visual and one educational intervention were judged to be clinically significant for improving patient comfort based on anxiety outcome measures (effect size ≥ 0.4, mean change is greater than the Minimal-Important-Difference and low-risk-of-bias). Medium to large effect sizes were reported in many interventions where differences did not exceed the Minimal-Important-Difference for the measure. These interventions were deemed worthy of further investigation. Conclusion Several interventions were identified that may improve comfort during radiotherapy assisting patients to sustain and endure the same position over time. This is crucial for the continual growth of complex radiotherapy requiring a need for comfort to ensure stability for targeted treatment. Implications for practice Further investigation of comfort interventions is warranted, including tailoring interventions to patient choice and determining if multiple interventions can be used concurrently to improve effectiveness.