Search

For most proteins in the genome databases, function is predicted via sequence comparison. In spite of the popularity of this approach, the extent to which it can be reliably applied is unknown. We address this issue by systematically investigating the relationship between protein function and structure. We focus initially on enzymes classified by the Enzyme Commission (EC) and relate these to structurally classified proteins in the SCOP database. We find that the major SCOP fold classes have different propensities to carry out certain broad categories of functions. For instance alpha/beta folds are disproportionately associated with enzymes, especially transferases and hydrolases, and all-alpha and small folds with non-enzymes, while alpha+beta folds have an equal tendency either way. These observations for the database overall are largely true for specific genomes. We focus, in particular, on yeast, analyzing it with many classifications in addition to SCOP and EC 9i.e. COGs, CATH, MIPS), and find clear tendencies for fold-function association, across a broad spectrum of functions. Analysis with the COGs scheme also suggests that the functions of the most ancient proteins are more evenly distributed among different structural classes than those of more modern ones. For the database overall, we identify both most versatile functions, i.e. those that are associated with the most folds, and most versatile folds, associated with the most functions. The two most versatile enzymatic functions (hydro-lvases and O-glycosyl glucosidases) are associated with 7 folds each. The five most versatile folds (TIM-barrel, Rossmann, ferredoxin, alpha-beta hydrolase, and P-loop NTP hydrolase) are all mixed alpha-beta structures. They stand out as generic scaffolds, accommodating from 6 to as many as 16 functions (for the exceptional TIM-barrel).

For most proteins in the genome databases, function is predicted via sequence comparison. In spite of the popularity of this approach, the extent to which it can be reliably applied is unknown. We address this issue by systematically investigating the relationship between protein function and structure. We focus initially on enzymes classified by the Enzyme Commission (EC) and relate these to structurally classified proteins in the SCOP database. We find that the major SCOP fold classes have different propensities to carry out certain broad categories of functions. For instance, alpha/beta folds are disproportionately associated with enzymes, especially transferases and hydrolases, and all-alpha and small folds with non-enzymes, while alpha + beta folds have an equal tendency either way. These observations for the database overall are largely true for specific genomes. We focus, in particular, on yeast, analyzing it with many classifications in addition to SCOP and EC (i.e. COGs, CATH, MIPS), and find clear tendencies for fold-function association, across a broad spectrum of functions. Analysis with the COGs scheme also suggests that the functions of the most ancient proteins are more evenly distributed among different structural classes than those of more modern ones. For the database overall, we identify the most versatile functions, i.e. those that are associated with the most folds, and the most versatile folds, associated with the most functions. The two most versatile enzymatic functions (hydro-Ivases and O-glycosyl glucosidases) are associated with seven folds each. The ve most versatile folds (TIM-barrel, Rossmann, ferredoxin, alpha-beta hydrolase, and P-loop NTP hydrolase) are all mixed alpha-beta structures. They stand out as generic scaffolds, accommodating from six to as many as 16 functions (for the exceptional TIM-barrel)., Pub. in Journal Molecular Biology, p1-18, 1999

We give an overview of the emerging field of structural genomics, describing how genomes can be compared in terms of protein structure. As the number of genes in a genome and the total number of protein folds are both quite limited, these comparisons take the form of surveys of a finite parts list, similar in respects to demographic censuses. Fold surveys have many similarities with other whole-genome characterizations, e.g. analyses of motifs or pathways. However, structure has a number of aspects that make it particularly suitable for comparing genomes, namely the way it allows for the precise definition of a basic protein module and the fact that it has a better defined relationship to sequence similarity than does protein function. An essential requirement for a structure survey is a library of folds, which groups the known structures into "fold families." This library can be built up automatically using a structure-comparison program, and we described how important objective statistical measures are for assessing similarities within the library and between the library and genome sequences. After building the library, one can use it to count the number of folds in genomes, expressing the results in the form of Venn diagrams and "top-10" statistics for shared and common folds. Depending on the counting methodology employed, these statistics can reflect different aspects of the genome, such as the amount of internal duplication or gene expression. Previous analyses have shown that the common folds shared between very different microorganisms - i.e. in different kingdoms - have a remarkably similar structure, being comprised of repeated strand-helix-strand super-secondary structure units. A major difficulty with this sort of "fold-counting" is that only a small subset of the structures in a complete genome are currently known and this subset is prone to sample bias., Submitted to FEMS Microbiology Reviews for publication.