53 results on '"Hegeman JH"'
Search Results
2. Augmented pin fixation with Cortoss((R)) for an unstable AO-A3 type distal radius fracture in a patient with a manifest osteoporosis.
- Author
-
Smit RS, van der Velde D, and Hegeman JH
- Published
- 2008
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
3. Variability in Care Pathways for Hip Fracture Patients in The Netherlands.
- Author
-
Bremen HV, Kroes T, Seppala LJ, Gans EA, Hegeman JH, van der Velde N, and Willems HC
- Abstract
Background/Objectives : Integrated orthogeriatric care has demonstrated benefits in hip fracture management for older patients. Comprehensive care pathways are essential for effective integrated care delivery, yet local variability in care pathways persists. We assessed the current hip fracture care pathways in the Netherlands, focusing on the variability between these care pathways and the degree of implementation of orthogeriatric care. Methods : A nationwide inventory study was conducted. A survey was sent to all hospitals in the Netherlands to collect the care pathways or local protocols for hip fracture care. All care elements reported in the care pathways and protocols were systematically analyzed by two independent researchers. Furthermore, an assessment was performed to determine which model of orthogeriatric care was applied. Results : All 71 Dutch hospitals were contacted, and 56 hospitals responded (79%), of which 46 (82%) provided a care pathway or protocol. Forty-one care elements were identified in total. In the care pathways and protocols, the variability in the description of these individual care elements ranged from 7% to 87%. Twenty-one hospitals had an integrated care model with shared responsibility, while an equal number followed an orthopedic trauma surgeon-led care model. Conclusions : These findings provide a detailed description of the hip fracture care pathways in the Netherlands. Variations were observed concerning the care elements described in the care pathways, the structure of the care pathway, and the specification of several elements. The implementation of integrated care with shared responsibilities, as recommended by the international literature, has not been achieved nationwide. The clinical implications of the variability between care pathways, such as the influence on the quality of care, need to be further investigated.
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
4. Rehabilitation of Frail Older Adults after Hip Fracture Surgery: Predictors for the Length of Geriatric Rehabilitation Stay at a Skilled Nursing Home.
- Author
-
Krakers SM, Woudsma S, van Dartel D, Vermeer M, Vollenbroek-Hutten MMR, Hegeman JH, and On Behalf Of The Up Amp Go After A Hip Fracture Group
- Abstract
Background: Approximately 50% of older patients hospitalized for hip fractures are admitted to a geriatric rehabilitation department at a skilled nursing home. Given the wide variation in rehabilitation stay lengths, predicting the length of stay upon hospital discharge would help manage patients' recovery expectations and create appropriate therapy schedules. Existing literature on length of stay predictors included both acute hospital and in-hospital rehabilitation phases or involved small sample sizes. The present study aims to identify predictors for the length of geriatric rehabilitation stay in skilled nursing homes for older patients after hip fracture surgery upon hospital discharge. Methods: This retrospective cohort study was conducted from 1 October 2017 to 1 July 2023, including 561 patients. Potential predictors of the length of geriatric rehabilitation stay were first tested univariately, with variables showing p < 0.15 entered into a multivariate forward linear regression model. Results: This model identified the following independent predictors of a longer length of geriatric rehabilitation stay: Functional Ambulation Categories (FACs) 0 (B = 29.9, 95% CI 24.1-35.7), 1 (B = 18.0, 95% CI 11.8-24.2), 2 (B = 12.0, 95% CI 7.1-17.0), or 3 (B = 3.6, 95% CI -1.2-9.4) at hospital discharge vs. FAC 4, living independently with home care services (B = 5.9, 95% CI 2.5-9.3) or in a residential home prior to the hip fracture (B = 0.2, 95% CI -7.4-7.8) vs. living independently without home care services, non- or partial weight-bearing mobilization vs. full weight-bearing mobilization (B = 15.4, 95% CI 8.5-22.2), internal fixation vs. hemiarthroplasty (B = 4.7, 95% CI 1.4-7.9), in-hospital delirium (B = 7.0, 95% CI 2.2-11.7), and in-hospital heart failure (B = 7.9, 95% CI 0.5-15.3). The explained variance was 32.0%. Conclusions: This study identified FAC at hospital discharge, premorbid living situation, postoperative weight-bearing protocol, surgery type, in-hospital delirium, and in-hospital heart failure as independent predictors of the length of geriatric rehabilitation stay. Future investigations are needed to identify additional predictors, such as cognitive functioning, to better predict the length of geriatric rehabilitation stay upon hospital discharge.
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
5. Characteristics and Outcomes of Nonoperatively Managed Patients With Hip Fracture Using the Dutch Hip Fracture Audit.
- Author
-
van Bremen HE, Seppala LJ, Hegeman JH, van der Velde N, and Willems HC
- Subjects
- Adult, Humans, Activities of Daily Living, Retrospective Studies, Odds Ratio, Treatment Outcome, Hip Fractures surgery, Dementia
- Abstract
Objectives: To identify and compare characteristics of patients with hip fracture treated nonoperatively versus those treated operatively., Design: Retrospective cohort study., Setting: Hip fracture population-based study., Patient Selection Criteria: All adult patients with hip fractures (OTA/AO 31A and 31B) were included. Patients with pathological or periprosthetic hip fractures were excluded., Outcome Measures and Comparisons: Patients were categorized according to the type of management (operative vs. nonoperative) and type of fracture (nondisplaced vs. other). Patient and fracture characteristics associated with nonoperative management (NOM) were analyzed., Results: A total of 94,930 patients with hip fracture were included. Of these, 3.2% were treated nonoperatively. Patients receiving NOM were older [86 years (interquartile range, 79-91 years) vs. 81 years (interquartile range, 72-87 years); P < 0.001], more frequently institutionalized (42.4% vs. 17.6%), and were more dependent in activities of daily living (22.2% vs. 55.0%). Various clinical characteristics, including dementia [odds ratio (OR) 1.31 (95% confidence interval, CI, 1.18-1.45) P < 0.001], no functional mobility [OR 4.39 (95% CI, 3.14-3.68) P < 0.001], and activities of daily living (ADL) measured as KATZ-6-ADL [OR 1.17 (95% CI, 1.14-1.20) P < 0.001] were independently associated with NOM. Seven-day mortality was 37.6%, and 30-day mortality was 57.1% in patients treated nonoperatively., Conclusions: The first step in understanding patients who potentially benefit from NOM is evaluating the current standard of care. This study provides insight into the current hip fracture population treated nonoperatively. These patients are older, have higher percentage of dementia, more dependent, and show higher short-term mortality rates., Level of Evidence: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence., Competing Interests: The authors report no conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.)
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
6. Systematic review and meta-analysis of preoperative predictors for early mortality following hip fracture surgery.
- Author
-
Bui M, Nijmeijer WS, Hegeman JH, Witteveen A, and Groothuis-Oudshoorn CGM
- Subjects
- Humans, Risk Factors, Prognosis, Age Factors, Risk Assessment methods, Sex Factors, Preoperative Period, Comorbidity, Hip Fractures surgery, Hip Fractures mortality, Osteoporotic Fractures mortality, Osteoporotic Fractures surgery
- Abstract
Hip fractures are a global health problem with a high postoperative mortality rate. Preoperative predictors for early mortality could be used to optimise and personalise healthcare strategies. This study aimed to identify predictors for early mortality following hip fracture surgery. Cohort studies examining independent preoperative predictors for mortality following hip fracture surgery were identified through a systematic search on Scopus and PubMed. Predictors for 30-day mortality were the primary outcome, and predictors for mortality within 1 year were secondary outcomes. Primary outcomes were analysed with random-effects meta-analyses. Confidence in the cumulative evidence was assessed using the GRADE criteria. Secondary outcomes were synthesised narratively. Thirty-three cohort studies involving 462,699 patients were meta-analysed. Five high-quality evidence predictors for 30-day mortality were identified: age per year (OR: 1.06, 95% CI: 1.04-1.07), ASA score ≥ 3 (OR: 2.69, 95% CI: 2.12-3.42), male gender (OR: 2.00, 95% CI: 1.85-2.18), institutional residence (OR: 1.81, 95% CI: 1.31-2.49), and metastatic cancer (OR: 2.83, 95% CI: 2.58-3.10). Additionally, six moderate-quality evidence predictors were identified: chronic renal failure, dementia, diabetes, low haemoglobin, heart failures, and a history of any malignancy. Weak evidence was found for non-metastatic cancer. This review found relevant preoperative predictors which could be used to identify patients who are at high risk of 30-day mortality following hip fracture surgery. For some predictors, the prognostic value could be increased by further subcategorising the conditions by severity., (© 2023. The Author(s).)
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
7. Palliative Non-Operative Management in Geriatric Hip Fracture Patients: When Would Surgeons Abstain from Surgery?
- Author
-
Bui M, Groothuis-Oudshoorn CGM, Witteveen A, and Hegeman JH
- Abstract
Background: For hip fracture patients with a limited life expectancy, operative and palliative non-operative management (P-NOM) can yield similar quality of life outcomes. However, evidence on when to abstain from surgery is lacking. The aim of this study was to quantify the influence of patient characteristics on surgeons' decisions to recommend P-NOM. Methods: Dutch surgical residents and orthopaedic trauma surgeons were enrolled in a conjoint analysis and structured expert judgement (SEJ). The participants assessed 16 patient cases comprising 10 clinically relevant characteristics. For each case, they recommended either surgery or P-NOM and estimated the 30-day postoperative mortality risk. Treatment recommendations were analysed using Bayesian logistic regression, and perceived risks were pooled with equal and performance-based weights using Cooke's Classical Model. Results: The conjoint analysis and SEJ were completed by 14 and 9 participants, respectively. Participants were more likely to recommend P-NOM to patients with metastatic carcinomas (OR: 4.42, CrI: 2.14-8.95), severe heart failure (OR: 4.05, CrI: 1.89-8.29), end-stage renal failure (OR: 3.54, CrI: 1.76-7.35) and dementia (OR: 3.35, CrI: 1.70-7.06). The patient receiving the most P-NOM recommendations (12/14) had a pooled perceived risk of 30-day mortality between 50.8 and 62.7%. Conclusions: Overall, comorbidities had the strongest influence on participants' decisions to recommend P-NOM. Nevertheless, practice variation and heterogeneity in risk perceptions were substantial. Hence, more decision support for considering P-NOM is needed.
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
8. Prediction of Physical Activity Patterns in Older Patients Rehabilitating After Hip Fracture Surgery: Exploratory Study.
- Author
-
van Dartel D, Wang Y, Hegeman JH, and Vollenbroek-Hutten MMR
- Abstract
Background: Building up physical activity is a highly important aspect in an older patient's rehabilitation process after hip fracture surgery. The patterns of physical activity during rehabilitation are associated with the duration of rehabilitation stay. Predicting physical activity patterns early in the rehabilitation phase can provide patients and health care professionals an early indication of the duration of rehabilitation stay as well as insight into the degree of patients' recovery for timely adaptive interventions., Objective: This study aims to explore the early prediction of physical activity patterns in older patients rehabilitating after hip fracture surgery at a skilled nursing home., Methods: The physical activity of patients aged ≥70 years with surgically treated hip fracture was continuously monitored using an accelerometer during rehabilitation at a skilled nursing home. Physical activity patterns were described in our previous study, and the 2 most common patterns were used in this study for pattern prediction: the upward linear pattern (n=15) and the S-shape pattern (n=23). Features from the intensity of physical activity were calculated for time windows with different window sizes of the first 5, 6, 7, and 8 days to assess the early rehabilitation moment in which the patterns could be predicted most accurately. Those features were statistical features, amplitude features, and morphological features. Furthermore, the Barthel Index, Fracture Mobility Score, Functional Ambulation Categories, and the Montreal Cognitive Assessment score were used as clinical features. With the correlation-based feature selection method, relevant features were selected that were highly correlated with the physical activity patterns and uncorrelated with other features. Multiple classifiers were used: decision trees, discriminant analysis, logistic regression, support vector machines, nearest neighbors, and ensemble classifiers. The performance of the prediction models was assessed by calculating precision, recall, and F
1 -score (accuracy measure) for each individual physical activity pattern. Furthermore, the overall performance of the prediction model was calculated by calculating the F1 -score for all physical activity patterns together., Results: The amplitude feature describing the overall intensity of physical activity on the first day of rehabilitation and the morphological features describing the shape of the patterns were selected as relevant features for all time windows. Relevant features extracted from the first 7 days with a cosine k-nearest neighbor model reached the highest overall prediction performance (micro F1 -score=1) and a 100% correct classification of the 2 most common physical activity patterns., Conclusions: Continuous monitoring of the physical activity of older patients in the first week of hip fracture rehabilitation results in an early physical activity pattern prediction. In the future, continuous physical activity monitoring can offer the possibility to predict the duration of rehabilitation stay, assess the recovery progress during hip fracture rehabilitation, and benefit health care organizations, health care professionals, and patients themselves., (©Dieuwke van Dartel, Ying Wang, Johannes H Hegeman, Miriam M R Vollenbroek-Hutten, Up&Go After a Hip Fracture Group. Originally published in JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technology (https://rehab.jmir.org), 30.11.2023.)- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
9. Cost-effectiveness analysis of the Geriatric Fracture Center (GFC) concept: a prospective multicentre cohort study.
- Author
-
Joeris A, Sprague S, Blauth M, Gosch M, Wattanapanom P, Jarayabhand R, Poeze M, Wong MK, Kwek EBK, Hegeman JH, Perez-Uribarri C, Guerado E, Revak TJ, Zohner S, Joseph D, and Phillips MR
- Subjects
- Humans, Aged, Prospective Studies, Cost-Benefit Analysis, Austria, Quality-Adjusted Life Years, Quality of Life, Cost-Effectiveness Analysis, Hip Fractures therapy
- Abstract
Introduction: Geriatric Fracture Centers (GFCs) are dedicated treatment units where care is tailored towards elderly patients who have suffered fragility fractures. The primary objective of this economic analysis was to determine the cost-utility of GFCs compared with usual care centres., Methods: The primary analysis was a cost-utility analysis that measured the cost per incremental quality-adjusted life-year gained from treatment of hip fracture in GFCs compared with treatment in usual care centres from the societal perspective over a 1-year time horizon. The secondary analysis was a cost-utility analysis from a societal perspective over a lifetime time horizon. We evaluated these outcomes using a cost-utility analysis using data from a large multicentre prospective cohort study comparing GFCs versus usual care centres that took place in Austria, Spain, the USA, the Netherlands, Thailand and Singapore., Results: GFCs may be cost-effective in the long term, while providing a more comprehensive care plan. Patients in usual care centre group were slightly older and had fewer comorbidities. For the 1-year analysis, the costs per patient were slightly lower in the GFC group (-$646.42), while the quality-adjusted life-years were higher in the usual care centre group (+0.034). The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was $18 863.34 (US$/quality-adjusted life-year). The lifetime horizon analysis found that the costs per patient were lower in the GFC group (-$7210.35), while the quality-adjusted life-years were higher in the usual care centre group (+0.02). The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was $320 678.77 (US$/quality-adjusted life-year)., Conclusions: This analysis found that GFCs were associated with lower costs compared with usual care centres. The cost-savings were greater when the lifetime time horizon was considered. This comprehensive cost-effectiveness analysis, using data from an international prospective cohort study, found that GFC may be cost-effective in the long term, while providing a more comprehensive care plan. A greater number of major adverse events were reported at GFC, nevertheless a lower mortality rate associated with these adverse events at GFC. Due to the minor utility benefits, which may be a result of greater adverse event detection within the GFC group and much greater costs of usual care centres, the GFC may be cost-effective due to the large cost-savings it demonstrated over the lifetime time horizon, while potentially identifying and treating adverse events more effectively. These findings suggest that the GFC may be a cost-effective option over the lifetime of a geriatric patient with hip fracture, although future research is needed to further validate these findings., Level of Evidence: Economic, level 2., Trial Registration Number: NCT02297581., Competing Interests: Competing interests: AJ—employed by AO Foundation. SS—paid employee of Global Research Solutions. JHH—board member of the Dutch Society for Trauma Surgery; chairman of the Dutch Hip Fracture Audit. EG—fees to institution to support research by AO Foundation; member of the EFFORT European Federation Orthopaedic and Trauma; former president of SECOT Spanish Orthopaedic and Trauma Society. TJR—support for presenting manuscript by AO Foundation. RJ—honoraria from regional faculty for AO Trauma. MB—grants and fees from Depuy Synthes. MG—honoraria from Amgen, advisory board with UCB Pharma, president elect of the German Geriatric Society. MP—paid employee of Global Research Solutions. PW, MP, EBKK, MKW, CP-U, SZ, DJ—no conflicts., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
10. Transparency in hip fracture recovery over institutional boundaries: The transmural monitoring pathway.
- Author
-
Nijmeijer WS, van Dartel D, de Groot R, Woudsma S, Folbert EC, den Braber N, Vermeer M, Hegeman JH, and Vollenbroek-Hutten MM
- Subjects
- Humans, Aged, Prospective Studies, Recovery of Function, Longitudinal Studies, Activities of Daily Living, Hip Fractures rehabilitation
- Abstract
Objectives: To develop a transmural pathway for healthcare professionals across institutions to monitor the recovery of hip fracture patients. The secondary objectives were to evaluate the pathway's feasibility and initial outcomes., Design: Prospective cohort study., Method: Stakeholders of the hospital and geriatric rehabilitation institutions implemented a transmural monitoring pathway in which different geriatric health domains were monitored during three phases: The in-hospital, inpatient rehabilitation, and outpatient follow-up phase. The outcomes for the first 291 patients and the feasibility of the pathway were evaluated. If the outcomes of the clinimetrics significantly improved over time, progress in functional recovery was assumed. Feasibility was assessed according to the rate of adherence to the clinimetric tests., Results: During the in-hospital phase, patients showed a decline in functional level (the Katz index of independence in Activities of Daily Living (Katz-ADL) pre-fracture vs. discharge: 0 (0-2) vs. 4 (4-5), P < 0.001). Patients, in which 78.6% (n = 140) had cognitive impairment and 41.2% had malnutrition, showed the most progress (Katz-ADL 2 (1-3)) during the inpatient rehabilitation phase. In the outpatient follow-up phase, recovery remained ongoing, but most patients had not returned to their pre-fracture functional levels (Katz-ADL 1 (1-3)). The pathway feasibility during the first phase was excellent (>85%), whereas room for improvement existed during other phases (<85%)., Conclusion: The transmural monitoring pathway provides insight into the entire recovery process for all involved healthcare professionals. Patients showed the most progress during the rehabilitation phase. The pathway feasibility was excellent during the in-hospital phase, but improvements could be made during other phases.
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
11. Early Warning Scores to Support Continuous Wireless Vital Sign Monitoring for Complication Prediction in Patients on Surgical Wards: Retrospective Observational Study.
- Author
-
van Rossum MC, Bekhuis REM, Wang Y, Hegeman JH, Folbert EC, Vollenbroek-Hutten MMR, Kalkman CJ, Kouwenhoven EA, and Hermens HJ
- Abstract
Background: Wireless vital sign sensors are increasingly being used to monitor patients on surgical wards. Although early warning scores (EWSs) are the current standard for the identification of patient deterioration in a ward setting, their usefulness for continuous monitoring is unknown., Objective: This study aimed to explore the usability and predictive value of high-rate EWSs obtained from continuous vital sign recordings for early identification of postoperative complications and compares the performance of a sensor-based EWS alarm system with manual intermittent EWS measurements and threshold alarms applied to individual vital sign recordings (single-parameter alarms)., Methods: Continuous vital sign measurements (heart rate, respiratory rate, blood oxygen saturation, and axillary temperature) collected with wireless sensors in patients on surgical wards were used for retrospective simulation of EWSs (sensor EWSs) for different time windows (1-240 min), adopting criteria similar to EWSs based on manual vital signs measurements (nurse EWSs). Hourly sensor EWS measurements were compared between patients with (event group: 14/46, 30%) and without (control group: 32/46, 70%) postoperative complications. In addition, alarms were simulated for the sensor EWSs using a range of alarm thresholds (1-9) and compared with alarms based on nurse EWSs and single-parameter alarms. Alarm performance was evaluated using the sensitivity to predict complications within 24 hours, daily alarm rate, and false discovery rate (FDR)., Results: The hourly sensor EWSs of the event group (median 3.4, IQR 3.1-4.1) was significantly higher (P<.004) compared with the control group (median 2.8, IQR 2.4-3.2). The alarm sensitivity of the hourly sensor EWSs was the highest (80%-67%) for thresholds of 3 to 5, which was associated with alarm rates of 2 (FDR=85%) to 1.2 (FDR=83%) alarms per patient per day respectively. The sensitivity of sensor EWS-based alarms was higher than that of nurse EWS-based alarms (maximum=40%) but lower than that of single-parameter alarms (87%) for all thresholds. In contrast, the (false) alarm rates of sensor EWS-based alarms were higher than that of nurse EWS-based alarms (maximum=0.6 alarm/patient/d; FDR=80%) but lower than that of single-parameter alarms (2 alarms/patient/d; FDR=84%) for most thresholds. Alarm rates for sensor EWSs increased for shorter time windows, reaching 70 alarms per patient per day when calculated every minute., Conclusions: EWSs obtained using wireless vital sign sensors may contribute to the early recognition of postoperative complications in a ward setting, with higher alarm sensitivity compared with manual EWS measurements. Although hourly sensor EWSs provide fewer alarms compared with single-parameter alarms, high false alarm rates can be expected when calculated over shorter time spans. Further studies are recommended to optimize care escalation criteria for continuous monitoring of vital signs in a ward setting and to evaluate the effects on patient outcomes., (©Mathilde C van Rossum, Robin E M Bekhuis, Ying Wang, Johannes H Hegeman, Ellis C Folbert, Miriam M R Vollenbroek-Hutten, Cornelis J Kalkman, Ewout A Kouwenhoven, Hermie J Hermens. Originally published in JMIR Perioperative Medicine (http://periop.jmir.org), 30.08.2023.)
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
12. Patterns of physical activity over time in older patients rehabilitating after hip fracture surgery: a preliminary observational study.
- Author
-
van Dartel D, Wang Y, Hegeman JH, Vermeer M, and Vollenbroek-Hutten MMR
- Subjects
- Humans, Aged, Length of Stay, Treatment Outcome, Hospitalization, Exercise, Hip Fractures surgery, Hip Fractures rehabilitation
- Abstract
Background: To investigate patterns of continuously monitored physical activity in older patients rehabilitating after hip fracture surgery and the association with patient characteristics., Methods: Physical activity of surgically treated hip fracture patients aged 70 years or older, who were rehabilitating at a skilled nursing home, was continuously monitored using a tri-axial accelerometer. The intensity of physical activity per day was calculated from the accelerometer signals to describe the daily physical activity levels of the enrolled patients. The patterns of three different aspects of physical activity were investigated: overall physical activity, overall variability, and day-to-day variability. Two experts in the geriatric rehabilitation field helped identifying unique physical activity patterns for each aspect based on visual analysis. Eighteen healthcare professionals independently classified each patient in one of the predefined patterns for each aspect. Differences between physical activity patterns and patient characteristics were assessed using a Kruskal-Wallis or Fisher's Exact Test., Results: Physical activity data from 66 older patients were used in this preliminary study. A total of six unique patterns were identified for overall physical activity and overall variability, and five unique patterns for the day-to-day variability. The most common pattern found for the overall physical activity and day-to-day variability had a S-shape, which first slowly increased, then steeply increased, and subsequently flattened (n = 23, 34.8%). A N-shape pattern was found the most common pattern for overall variability, which first slowly increased, then steeply increased, then decreased and lastly increased (n = 14, 21.2%). The functionality at admission to rehabilitation, measured with the Barthel Index, and the duration of rehabilitation stay differed between the patterns of physical activity., Conclusions: Multiple patterns of physical activity among older patients during hip fracture rehabilitation were found in this preliminary study. The functionality at admission to rehabilitation and the duration of rehabilitation stay were associated with the different patterns found in this study. Results of this study highlight the importance of personalized hip fracture treatment., (© 2023. The Author(s).)
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
13. Is hospital volume related to quality of hip fracture care? Analysis of 43,538 patients and 68 hospitals from the Dutch Hip Fracture Audit.
- Author
-
Würdemann FS, van Zwet EW, Krijnen P, Hegeman JH, and Schipper IB
- Subjects
- Humans, Hospitals, Length of Stay, Hip Fractures surgery
- Abstract
Purpose: Evidence for a hospital volume-outcome relationship in hip fracture surgery is inconclusive. This study aimed to analyze the association between hospital volume as a continuous parameter and several processes and outcomes of hip fracture care., Methods: Adult patients registered in the nationwide Dutch Hip Fracture Audit (DHFA) between 2018 and 2020 were included. The association between annual hospital volume and turnaround times (time on the emergency ward, surgery < 48 h and length of stay), orthogeriatric co-treatment and case-mix adjusted in-hospital and 30 days mortality was evaluated with generalized linear mixed models with random effects for hospital and treatment year. We used a fifth-degree polynomial to allow for nonlinear effects of hospital volume. P-values were adjusted for multiple comparisons using the Bonferoni method., Results: In total, 43,258 patients from 68 hospitals were included. The median annual hospital volume was 202 patients [range 1-546]. Baseline characteristics did not differ with hospital volume. Provision of orthogeriatric co-treatment improved with higher volumes but decreased at > 367 patients per year (p < 0.01). Hospital volume was not significantly associated with mortality outcomes. No evident clinical relation between hospital volume and turnaround times was found., Conclusion: This is the first study analyzing the effect of hospital volume on hip fracture care, treating volume as a continuous parameter. Mortality and turnaround times showed no clinically relevant association with hospital volume. The provision of orthogeriatric co-treatment, however, increased with increasing volumes up to 367 patients per year, but decreased above this threshold. Future research on the effect of volume on complications and functional outcomes is indicated., (© 2023. The Author(s).)
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
14. The prediction of early mortality following hip fracture surgery in patients aged 90 years and older: the Almelo Hip Fracture Score 90 (AHFS 90 ).
- Author
-
Nijmeijer WS, Voorthuis BJ, Groothuis-Oudshoorn CGM, Würdemann FS, van der Velde D, Vollenbroek-Hutten MMR, and Hegeman JH
- Subjects
- Humans, Aged, 80 and over, Risk Factors, Prognosis, Retrospective Studies, Hip Fractures surgery
- Abstract
The AHFS
90 was developed for the prediction of early mortality in patients ≥ 90 years undergoing hip fracture surgery. The AHFS90 has a good accuracy and in most risk categories a good calibration. In our study population, the AHFS90 yielded a maximum prediction of early mortality of 64.5%., Purpose: Identifying hip fracture patients with a high risk of early mortality after surgery could help make treatment decisions and information about the prognosis. This study aims to develop and validate a risk score for predicting early mortality in patients ≥ 90 years undergoing hip fracture surgery (AHFS90 )., Methods: Patients ≥ 90 years, surgically treated for a hip fracture, were included. A selection of possible predictors for mortality was made. Missing data were subjected to multiple imputations using chained equations. Logistic regression was performed to develop the AHFS90 , which was internally and externally validated. Calibration was assessed using a calibration plot and comparing observed and predicted risks., Results: One hundred and two of the 922 patients (11.1%) died ≤ 30 days following hip fracture surgery. The AHFS90 includes age, gender, dementia, living in a nursing home, ASA score, and hemoglobin level as predictors for early mortality. The AHFS90 had good accuracy (area under the curve 0.72 for geographic cross validation). Predicted risks correspond with observed risks of early mortality in four risk categories. In two risk categories, the AHFS90 overestimates the risk. In one risk category, no mortality was observed; therefore, no analysis was possible. The AHFS90 had a maximal prediction of early mortality of 64.5% in this study population., Conclusion: The AHFS90 accurately predicts early mortality after hip fracture surgery in patients ≥ 90 years of age. Predicted risks correspond to observed risks in most risk categories. In our study population, the AHFS90 yielded a maximum prediction of early mortality of 64.5%., (© 2023. The Author(s).)- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
15. Data-driven development of the nationwide hip fracture registry in the Netherlands.
- Author
-
Würdemann FS, Voeten SC, Wilschut JA, Schipper IB, and Hegeman JH
- Subjects
- Humans, Netherlands epidemiology, Prospective Studies, Registries, Hip Fractures epidemiology, Delirium epidemiology
- Abstract
Additional variables for a nationwide hip fracture registry must be carefully chosen to prevent unnecessary registry load. A registry pilot in seven hospitals resulted in recommending polypharmacy, serum hemoglobin at admittance, and questions screening for risk of delirium to be used in case-mix correction and for development of quality indicators., Purpose: Clinical registries help improve the quality of care but come at the cost of registration load. Datasets should therefore be as compact as possible; however, variables are usually chosen empirically. This study aims to evaluate potential variables with additional value to improve the nationwide Dutch Hip Fracture Audit (DHFA)., Methods: An expert panel selected eleven new variables for the DHFA, which were tested in a prospective cohort of all hip fracture patients treated in 2018 and 2019 in seven pilot hospitals participating in the DHFA. The association of these eleven variables with complications, mortality, and functional outcomes at 3 months was analyzed using multivariable logistic regression analysis. Based on the results, a proposal for variables to add to the dataset of the DHFA was made., Results: In 4.904 analyzed patients, three tested variables had significant associations (p < 0.01) with outcomes: polypharmacy with complications (aOR 1.34), serum hemoglobin at admittance with complications (aOR 0.63) and mortality (aOR for 30-day mortality 0.78), and a set of questions screening for risk of delirium with complications in general (aOR 1.55), e.g., delirium (aOR 2.98), and decreased functional scores at three months (aOR 1.98)., Conclusion: This study assesses potential new variables for a hip fracture registry. Based on the results of this study, we recommend polypharmacy, serum hemoglobin at admittance, and questions screening for risk of delirium to be used in case-mix correction and for the development of quality indicators. Incorporating these variables in the DHFA dataset may contribute to better and clinically relevant quality indicators., (© 2022. The Author(s).)
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
16. Trends in data quality and quality indicators 5 years after implementation of the Dutch Hip Fracture Audit.
- Author
-
Würdemann FS, Krijnen P, van Zwet EW, Arends AJ, Heetveld MJ, Trappenburg MC, Hegeman JH, and Schipper IB
- Subjects
- Humans, Quality Indicators, Health Care, Data Accuracy, Registries, Hip Fractures surgery, Osteoporosis
- Abstract
Purpose: The Dutch Hip Fracture Audit (DHFA), a nationwide hip fracture registry in the Netherlands, registers hip fracture patients and aims to improve quality of care since 2016. This study shows trends in the data quality during the first 5 years of data acquisition within the DHFA, as well as trends over time for designated quality indicators (QI)., Methods: All patients registered in the DHFA between 1-1-2016 and 31-12-2020 were included. Data quality-registry case coverage and data completeness-and baseline characteristics are reported. Five QI are analysed: Time to surgery < 48 h, assessment for osteoporosis, orthogeriatric co-management, registration of functional outcomes at three months, 30-day mortality. The independent association between QI results and report year was tested using mixed-effects logistic models and in the case of 30-day mortality adjusted for casemix., Results: In 2020, the case capture of the DHFA comprised 85% of the Dutch hip fracture patients, 66/68 hospitals participated. The average of missing clinical values was 7.5% in 2016 and 3.2% in 2020. The 3 months follow-up completeness was 36.2% (2016) and 46.8% (2020). The QI 'time to surgery' was consistently high, assessment for osteoporosis remained low, orthogeriatric co-management scores increased without significance, registration of functional outcomes improved significantly and 30-day mortality rates remained unchanged., Conclusion: The DHFA has successfully been implemented in the past five years. Trends show improvement on data quality. Analysis of several QI indicate points of attention. Future perspectives include lowering the burden of registration, whilst improving (registration of) hip fracture patients outcomes., (© 2022. The Author(s).)
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
17. Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on surgical care in the Netherlands.
- Author
-
de Graaff MR, Hogenbirk RNM, Janssen YF, Elfrink AKE, Liem RSL, Nienhuijs SW, de Vries JPM, Elshof JW, Verdaasdonk E, Melenhorst J, van Westreenen HL, Besselink MGH, Ruurda JP, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Klaase JM, den Dulk M, van Heijl M, Hegeman JH, Braun J, Voeten DM, Würdemann FS, Warps AK, Alberga AJ, Suurmeijer JA, Akpinar EO, Wolfhagen N, van den Boom AL, Bolster-van Eenennaam MJ, van Duijvendijk P, Heineman DJ, Wouters MWJM, and Kruijff S
- Subjects
- Humans, Netherlands, Pandemics, Hospitals, Hospitalization, COVID-19
- Abstract
Background: The COVID-19 pandemic caused disruption of regular healthcare leading to reduced hospital attendances, repurposing of surgical facilities, and cancellation of cancer screening programmes. This study aimed to determine the impact of COVID-19 on surgical care in the Netherlands., Methods: A nationwide study was conducted in collaboration with the Dutch Institute for Clinical Auditing. Eight surgical audits were expanded with items regarding alterations in scheduling and treatment plans. Data on procedures performed in 2020 were compared with those from a historical cohort (2018-2019). Endpoints included total numbers of procedures performed and altered treatment plans. Secondary endpoints included complication, readmission, and mortality rates., Results: Some 12 154 procedures were performed in participating hospitals in 2020, representing a decrease of 13.6 per cent compared with 2018-2019. The largest reduction (29.2 per cent) was for non-cancer procedures during the first COVID-19 wave. Surgical treatment was postponed for 9.6 per cent of patients. Alterations in surgical treatment plans were observed in 1.7 per cent. Time from diagnosis to surgery decreased (to 28 days in 2020, from 34 days in 2019 and 36 days in 2018; P < 0.001). For cancer-related procedures, duration of hospital stay decreased (5 versus 6 days; P < 0.001). Audit-specific complications, readmission, and mortality rates were unchanged, but ICU admissions decreased (16.5 versus 16.8 per cent; P < 0.001)., Conclusion: The reduction in the number of surgical operations was greatest for those without cancer. Where surgery was undertaken, it appeared to be delivered safely, with similar complication and mortality rates, fewer admissions to ICU, and a shorter hospital stay., (© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of BJS Society Ltd.)
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
18. Implementation of a pneumonia prevention protocol to decrease the incidence of postoperative pneumonia in patients after hip fracture surgery.
- Author
-
Geerds MAJ, Folbert EC, Visschedijk SFM, Klunder MB, Vollenbroek-Hutten MMR, and Hegeman JH
- Subjects
- Aged, Humans, Incidence, Postoperative Complications epidemiology, Postoperative Complications etiology, Postoperative Complications prevention & control, Retrospective Studies, Risk Factors, Hip Fractures complications, Hip Fractures surgery, Pneumonia epidemiology, Pneumonia prevention & control
- Abstract
Objective: Postoperative pneumonia is among the most common complications in elderly patients after hip fracture surgery. We implemented a proactive postoperative pneumonia prevention protocol and analyzed the incidence of postoperative pneumonia in elderly patients (≥70 years of age) receiving this protocol after hip fracture surgery versus those receiving usual care before the protocol's implementation at our institution., Materials and Methods: From November 2018 to October 2019, the proactive postoperative pneumonia prevention protocol was implemented. The treatment included intensified physical therapy, postoperative pulmonary exercises and oral care, in addition to the usual surgical treatment for elderly patients with hip fracture. The intervention cohort data were compared with a historical control cohort treated from July 2017 to June 2018. The primary outcome of this study was the incidence of postoperative pneumonia in both groups, diagnosed according to the presence of two of three of the following: elevated infection parameters, radiologic examination confirmation of pneumonia of the chest or clinical suspicion., Results: A total of 494 patients (n= 249 in the historical control cohort and n=245 in the intervention cohort) were included. A total of 69 patients developed postoperative pneumonia. The incidence of postoperative pneumonia was significantly lower (6.7 percentage points) in the group receiving the proactive postoperative pneumonia prevention protocol (17.3% in the historical control cohort vs 10.6% in the intervention cohort; p=0.033)., Discussion and Conclusion: A proactive postoperative pneumonia prevention protocol showed promise in decreasing the occurrence of postoperative pneumonia after hip fracture surgery in elderly patients., Competing Interests: Conflicts of Interest None declared., (Copyright © 2022. Published by Elsevier Ltd.)
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
19. Correction to: Development of a data-driven case-mix adjustment model for comparison of hospital performance in hip fracture care.
- Author
-
Würdemann FS, Elfrink AKE, Wilschut JA, van den Brand CL, Schipper IB, and Hegeman JH
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
20. Radiology report generation for proximal femur fractures using deep classification and language generation models.
- Author
-
Paalvast O, Nauta M, Koelle M, Geerdink J, Vijlbrief O, Hegeman JH, and Seifert C
- Subjects
- Aged, Femur, Humans, Language, Radiography, Hip Fractures diagnostic imaging, Radiology
- Abstract
Proximal femur fractures represent a major health concern, and substantially contribute to the morbidity of elderly. Correct classification and diagnosis of hip fractures has a significant impact on mortality, costs and hospital stay. In this paper, we present a method and empirical validation for automatic subclassification of proximal femur fractures and Dutch radiological report generation that does not rely on manually curated data. The fracture classification model was trained on 11,000 X-ray images obtained from 5000 electronic health records in a general hospital. To generate the Dutch reports, we first trained an embedding model on 20,000 radiological reports of pelvic region fractures, and used its embeddings in the report generation model. We trained the report generation model on the 5000 radiological reports associated with the fracture cases. Our report generation model is on par with state-of-the-art in terms of BLEU and ROUGE scores. This is promising, because in contrast to those earlier works, our approach does not require manual preprocessing of either images or the reports. This boosts the applicability of automatic clinical report generation in practice. A quantitative and qualitative user study among medical students found no significant difference in provenance of real and generated reports. A qualitative, in-depth clinical relevance study with medical domain experts showed that from a human perspective the quality of the generated reports approximates the quality of the original reports and highlights challenges in creating sufficiently detailed and versatile training data for automatic radiology report generation., (Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
21. Development of a data-driven case-mix adjustment model for comparison of hospital performance in hip fracture care.
- Author
-
Würdemann FS, Elfrink AKE, Wilschut JA, van den Brand CL, Schipper IB, and Hegeman JH
- Subjects
- Diagnosis-Related Groups, Hospital Mortality, Hospitals, Humans, Male, Hip Fractures, Risk Adjustment
- Abstract
To compare hospitals' hip fracture patient mortality in a quality of care registry, correction for patient characteristics is needed. This study evaluates in 39,374 patients which characteristics are associated with 30 and 90-day mortality, and showed how using these characteristics in a case mix-model changes hospital comparisons within the Netherlands., Purpose: Mortality rates after hip fracture surgery are considerable and may be influenced by patient characteristics. This study aims to evaluate hospital variation regarding patient demographics and disease burden, to develop a case-mix adjustment model to analyse differences in hip fracture patients' mortality to calculate case-mix adjusted hospital-specific mortality rates., Methods: Data were derived from 64 hospitals participating in the Dutch Hip Fracture Audit (DHFA). Adult hip fracture patients registered in 2017-2019 were included. Variation of case-mix factors between hospitals was analysed, and the association between case-mix factors and mortality at 30 and 90 days was determined through regression models., Results: There were 39,374 patients included. Significant variation in case-mix factors amongst hospitals was found for age ≥ 80 (range 25.8-72.1% p < 0.001), male gender (12.0-52.9% p < 0.001), nursing home residents (42.0-57.9% p < 0.001), pre-fracture mobility aid use (9.9-86.7% p < 0,001), daily living dependency (27.5-96.5% p < 0,001), ASA-class ≥ 3 (25.8-83.3% p < 0.001), dementia (3.6-28.6% p < 0.001), osteoporosis (0.0-57.1% p < 0.001), risk of malnutrition (0.0-29.2% p < 0.001) and fracture types (all p < 0.001). All factors were associated with 30- and 90-day mortality. Eight hospitals showed higher and six showed lower 30-day mortality than expected based on their case-mix. Six hospitals showed higher and seven lower 90-day mortality than expected. The specific outlier hospitals changed when correcting for case-mix factors., Conclusions: Dutch hospitals show significant case-mix variation regarding hip fracture patients. Case-mix adjustment is a prerequisite when comparing hospitals' 30-day and 90-day hip fracture patients' mortality. Adjusted mortality may serve as a starting point for improving hip fracture care., (© 2022. The Author(s).)
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
22. Early Predictors for Discharge to Geriatric Rehabilitation after Hip Fracture Treatment of Older Patients.
- Author
-
van Dartel D, Vermeer M, Folbert EC, Arends AJ, Vollenbroek-Hutten MMR, and Hegeman JH
- Subjects
- Aged, Humans, Patient Discharge, Retrospective Studies, Skilled Nursing Facilities, Activities of Daily Living, Hip Fractures surgery
- Abstract
Objective: To investigate early predictors for discharge to a geriatric rehabilitation department at a skilled nursing home in older patients after hospitalization for hip fracture surgery., Design: Retrospective cohort study., Setting and Participants: Data from 21,176 patients with hip fracture aged ≥70 years, who were registered in the Dutch Hip Fracture Audit database between January 1, 2017, and December 31, 2019, were included., Methods: Patients were categorized into 3 discharge groups: home (n=7326), rehabilitation (n=11,738), and nursing home (n=2112). Age, gender, Pre-Fracture Mobility Score (PFMS), premorbid Katz index of independence in Activities of Daily Living (Katz-ADL), history of dementia, American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status classification (ASA score), type of anesthesia, fracture type, surgical treatment, and cotreatment by a geriatrician were gathered. Multinomial regression analysis was used to assess for early predictors., Results: Higher age, poor premorbid mobility, lower premorbid Katz-ADL, no history of dementia, ASA score 3-5, general anesthesia, intramedullary implant, and cotreatment by a geriatrician were independent predictors for discharge to geriatric rehabilitation vs discharge home. Identical predictors were found for discharge to a nursing home vs discharge home. History of dementia and premorbid Katz-ADL were distinguishing factors; a higher premorbid Katz-ADL and a history of dementia were associated with a higher risk of discharge to a nursing home vs discharge home. The multinomial regression model correctly predicted 86%, 38.6%, and 2.4% of the patients in the rehabilitation group, home group, and nursing home group, respectively., Conclusions and Implications: This study showed that age, PFMS, premorbid Katz-ADL, surgical treatment, ASA score, type of anesthesia, history of dementia, and cotreatment by a geriatrician were independent early predictors for discharge to geriatric rehabilitation vs discharge home in older patients after hip fracture surgery. Identical predictors were found as predictors for discharge to a nursing home vs discharge home, except for history of dementia and premorbid Katz-ADL., (Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
23. [Are the older patients with a hip fracture better off with a multidisciplinary approach?]
- Author
-
Folbert EC, Hegeman JH, and Vollenbroek-Hutten M
- Subjects
- Aged, Humans, Length of Stay, Health Services for the Aged, Hip Fractures therapy
- Abstract
Integrated orthogeriatric treatment, led by a nurse practitioner, is an important step forward in the improvement of care for older people with a hip fracture. In this paper we reflect on the study of Van Leendert et al. Their main findings are similar to the literature with a significantly reduced 1-year mortality rate in the orthogeriatric group compared to the standard care group. However, there are some remarks to be made regarding the patient characteristics that are unbalanced in favor of the orthogeriatric group, with an overrepresentation of a certain type of fracture, indicating potentially more vulnerable patients in the standard care group. Although a significant step forward, we also address that still face major challenges, that technology might be an enabler for further improvement but that it might also be time to introduce a new perspective on recovery that makes better use of the dynamics of the system.
- Published
- 2021
24. Geriatric fracture centre vs usual care after proximal femur fracture in older patients: what are the benefits? Results of a large international prospective multicentre study.
- Author
-
Blauth M, Joeris A, Rometsch E, Espinoza-Rebmann K, Wattanapanom P, Jarayabhand R, Poeze M, Wong MK, Kwek EBK, Hegeman JH, Perez-Uribarri C, Guerado E, Revak TJ, Zohner S, Joseph D, and Gosch M
- Subjects
- Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Cohort Studies, Femur, Humans, Prospective Studies, Hip Fractures surgery, Quality of Life
- Abstract
Objective: The aim of this study was to determine the effect of treatment in geriatric fracture centres (GFC) on the incidence of major adverse events (MAEs) in patients with hip fractures compared with usual care centres (UCC). Secondary objectives included hospital-workflow and mobility-related outcomes., Design: Cohort study recruiting patients between June 2015 and January 2017. Follow-up was 1 year., Setting: International (six countries, three continents) multicentre study., Participants: 281 patients aged ≥70 with operatively treated proximal femur fractures., Interventions: Treatment in UCCs (n=139) or GFCs (n=142), that is, interdisciplinary treatment including regular geriatric consultation and daily physiotherapy., Outcome Measures: Primary outcome was occurrence of prespecified MAEs, including delirium. Secondary outcomes included any other adverse events, time to surgery, time in acute ward, 1-year mortality, mobility, and quality of life., Results: Patients treated in GFCs (n=142) had a mean age of 81.9 (SD, 6.6) years versus 83.9 (SD 6.9) years in patients (n=139) treated in UCCs (p=0.013) and a higher mean Charlson Comorbidity Index of 2.0 (SD, 2.1) versus 1.2 (SD, 1.5) in UCCs (p=0.001). More patients in GFCs (28.2%) experienced an MAE during the first year after surgery compared with UCCs (7.9%) with an OR of 4.56 (95% CI 2.23 to 9.34, p<0.001). Analysing individual MAEs, this was significant for pneumonia (GFC: 9.2%; UCC: 2.9%; OR, 3.40 (95% CI 1.08 to 10.70), p=0.027) and delirium (GFC: 11.3%; UCC: 2.2%, OR, 5.76 (95% CI 1.64 to 20.23), p=0.002)., Conclusions: Contrary to our study hypothesis, the rate of MAEs was higher in GFCs than in UCCs. Delirium was revealed as a main contributor. Most likely, this was based on improved detection rather than a truly elevated incidence, which we interpret as positive effect of geriatric comanagement., Trial Registration Number: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02297581., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
25. Textbook process as a composite quality indicator for in-hospital hip fracture care.
- Author
-
Voeten SC, Wouters MWJM, Würdemann FS, Krijnen P, Schipper IB, and Hegeman JH
- Subjects
- Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Hospitalization, Hospitals, Humans, Length of Stay, Hip Fractures epidemiology, Hip Fractures therapy, Quality Indicators, Health Care
- Abstract
Individual process indicators often do not enable the benchmarking of hospitals and often lack an association with outcomes of care. The composite hip fracture process indicator, textbook process, might be a tool to detect hospital variation and is associated with better outcomes during hospital stay., Purpose: The aim of this study was to determine hospital variation in quality of hip fracture care using a composite process indicator (textbook process) and to evaluate at patient level whether fulfilment of the textbook process indicator was associated with better outcomes during hospital stay., Methods: Hip fracture patients aged 70 and older operated in five hospitals between 1 January 2018 and 31 December 2018 were included. Textbook process for hip fracture care was defined as follows: (1) assessment of malnutrition (2) surgery within 24 h, (3) orthogeriatric management during admission and (4) operation by an orthopaedic trauma certified surgeon. Hospital variation analysis was done by computing an observed/expected ratio (O/E ratio) for textbook process at hospital level. The expected ratios were derived from a multivariable logistic regression analysis including all relevant case-mix variables. The association between textbook process compliance and in-hospital complications and prolonged hospital stay was determined at patient level in a multivariable logistic regression model, with correction for patient, treatment and hospital characteristics. In-hospital complications were anaemia, delirium, pneumonia, urinary tract infection, in-hospital fall, heart failure, renal insufficiency, pulmonary embolism, wound infection and pressure ulcer., Results: Of the 1371 included patients, 753 (55%) received care according to textbook process. At hospital level, the textbook compliance rates ranged from 38 to 76%. At patient level, textbook process compliance was significantly associated with fewer complications (38% versus 46%) (OR 0.66, 95% CI 0.52-0.84), but not with hospital stay (median length of hospital stay was 5 days in both groups) (OR 1.01, 95% CI 0.78-1.30)., Conclusion: The textbook process indicator for hip fracture care might be a tool to detect hospital variation. At patient level, this quality indicator is associated with fewer complications during hospital stay.
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
26. Comparing three machine learning approaches to design a risk assessment tool for future fractures: predicting a subsequent major osteoporotic fracture in fracture patients with osteopenia and osteoporosis.
- Author
-
de Vries BCS, Hegeman JH, Nijmeijer W, Geerdink J, Seifert C, and Groothuis-Oudshoorn CGM
- Subjects
- Aged, Bone Density, Humans, Machine Learning, Retrospective Studies, Risk Assessment, Risk Factors, Hip Fractures, Osteoporosis complications, Osteoporosis epidemiology, Osteoporotic Fractures epidemiology, Osteoporotic Fractures etiology
- Abstract
Four machine learning models were developed and compared to predict the risk of a future major osteoporotic fracture (MOF), defined as hip, wrist, spine and humerus fractures, in patients with a prior fracture. We developed a user-friendly tool for risk calculation of subsequent MOF in osteopenia patients, using the best performing model., Introduction: Major osteoporotic fractures (MOFs), defined as hip, wrist, spine and humerus fractures, can have serious consequences regarding morbidity and mortality. Machine learning provides new opportunities for fracture prediction and may aid in targeting preventive interventions to patients at risk of MOF. The primary objective is to develop and compare several models, capable of predicting the risk of MOF as a function of time in patients seen at the fracture and osteoporosis outpatient clinic (FO-clinic) after sustaining a fracture., Methods: Patients aged > 50 years visiting an FO-clinic were included in this retrospective study. We compared discriminative ability (concordance index) for predicting the risk on MOF with a Cox regression, random survival forests (RSF) and an artificial neural network (ANN)-DeepSurv model. Missing data was imputed using multiple imputations by chained equations (MICE) or RSF's imputation function. Analyses were performed for the total cohort and a subset of osteopenia patients without vertebral fracture., Results: A total of 7578 patients were included, 805 (11%) patients sustained a subsequent MOF. The highest concordance-index in the total dataset was 0.697 (0.664-0.730) for Cox regression; no significant difference was determined between the models. In the osteopenia subset, Cox regression outperformed RSF (p = 0.043 and p = 0.023) and ANN-DeepSurv (p = 0.043) with a c-index of 0.625 (0.562-0.689). Cox regression was used to develop a MOF risk calculator on this subset., Conclusion: We show that predicting the risk of MOF in patients who already sustained a fracture can be done with adequate discriminative performance. We developed a user-friendly tool for risk calculation of subsequent MOF in patients with osteopenia.
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
27. Development and Internal Validation of a Prediction Model for In-Hospital Mortality in Geriatric Patients With a Hip Fracture.
- Author
-
Schuijt HJ, Smeeing DPJ, Würdemann FS, Hegeman JH, Geraghty OC, Houwert RM, Weaver MJ, and van der Velde D
- Subjects
- Aged, 80 and over, Cohort Studies, Female, Hospital Mortality, Humans, Male, Prospective Studies, Retrospective Studies, Risk Factors, Hip Fractures surgery
- Abstract
Objective: To develop and validate a prediction model for in-hospital mortality in patients with hip fracture 85 years of age or older undergoing surgery., Design: A multicenter prospective cohort study., Setting: Six Dutch trauma centers, level 2 and 3., Participants: Patients with hip fracture 85 years of age or older undergoing surgery., Intervention: Hip fracture surgery., Main Outcome Measurements: In-hospital mortality., Results: The development cohort consisted of 1014 patients. In-hospital mortality was 4%. Age, male sex, American Society of Anesthesiologists classification, and hemoglobin levels at presentation were independent predictors of in-hospital mortality. The bootstrap adjusted performance showed good discrimination with a c-statistic of 0.77., Conclusion: Age, male sex, higher American Society of Anesthesiologists classification, and lower hemoglobin levels at presentation are robust independent predictors of in-hospital mortality in patients with geriatric hip fracture and were incorporated in a simple prediction model with good accuracy and no lack of fit., Level of Evidence: Prognostic Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence., Competing Interests: The authors report no conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2020 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
28. Clockwise Torque of Sliding Hip Screws: Is There a Right Side?
- Author
-
Würdemann FS, Poolman RW, Krijnen P, Bzovsky S, Sprague S, Kaptein BL, Hegeman JH, Schemitsch EH, Bhandari M, Swiontkowski M, and Schipper IB
- Subjects
- Bone Screws, Female, Fracture Fixation, Internal, Humans, Torque, Femoral Neck Fractures surgery, Hip Fractures surgery
- Abstract
Objectives: This study evaluated whether patients with a left-sided femoral neck fracture (FNF) treated with a sliding hip screw (SHS) had a higher implant failure rate than patients treated for a right-sided FNF. This was performed to determine the clinical relevance of the clockwise rotational torque of the femoral neck lag screw in a SHS, in relation to the rotational stability of left and right-sided FNFs after fixation., Methods: Data were derived from the FAITH trial and Dutch Hip Fracture Audit (DHFA). Patients with a FNF, aged ≥50, treated with a SHS, with at least 3-month follow-up data available, were included. Implant failure was analyzed in a multivariable logistic regression model adjusted for age, sex, fracture displacement, prefracture living setting and functional mobility, and American Society for Anesthesiologists Class., Results: One thousand seven hundred fifty patients were included, of which 944 (53.9%) had a left-sided and 806 (46.1%) a right-sided FNF. Implant failure occurred in 60 cases (3.4%), of which 31 were left-sided and 29 right-sided. No association between fracture side and implant failure was found [odds ratio (OR) for left vs. right 0.89, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.52-1.52]. Female sex (OR 3.02, CI: 1.62-6.10), using a mobility aid (OR 2.02, CI 1.01-3.96) and a displaced fracture (OR 2.51, CI: 1.44-4.42), were associated with implant failure., Conclusions: This study could not substantiate the hypothesis that the biomechanics of the clockwise screw rotation of the SHS contributes to an increased risk of implant failure in left-sided FNFs compared with right-sided fractures., Level of Evidence: Therapeutic Level II.See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
29. Mobile App for Monitoring 3-Month Postoperative Functional Outcome After Hip Fracture: Usability Study.
- Author
-
Geerds MAJ, Nijmeijer WS, Hegeman JH, and Vollenbroek-Hutten MMR
- Abstract
Background: As a result of an aging population, there has been an increasing incidence of hip fractures worldwide. In the Netherlands, in order to improve the quality of care for elderly patients with hip fractures, the multidisciplinary Centre for Geriatric Traumatology was established in 2008 at the Department of Trauma Surgery at Ziekenhuisgroep Twente hospital (located in Almelo and Hengelo in the Netherlands)., Objective: Though the Dutch Hip Fracture audit is used to monitor the quality of care for patients with fractures of the hip, only 30.7% of patients complete registration in the 3-month follow-up period. Mobile apps offer an opportunity for improvement in this area. The aim of this study was to investigate the usability and acceptance of a mobile app for gathering indicators of quality of care in a 3-month follow-up period after postoperative treatment of hip fracture., Methods: From July 2017 to December 2017, patients who underwent surgical treatment for hip fracture were recruited. Patients and caregivers, who were collectively considered the participant cohort, were asked to download the app and answer a questionnaire. Participants were divided into two groups-those who downloaded the app and those who did not download the app. A telephone interview that was based upon the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology was conducted with a subset of participants from each group (1:1 ratio). This study was designated as not being subject to the Dutch Medical Research Involving Human Subjects Act according to the appropriate medical research ethics committees., Results: Of the patients and caregivers who participated, 26.4% (29/110) downloaded the app, whereas 73.6% (81/110) did not. Telephone interviews with the subset of participants (n=24 per group) revealed that 54.0% (13/24) of the group of participants who did not download the app had forgotten the study. Among the group who downloaded the app, 95.8% (23/24) had the intention of completing the questionnaire, but only 4.2% (1/24) did so. The reasons for not completing the questionnaire included technical problems, cognitive disorders, or patient dependency on caregivers. Most participants in the group who downloaded the app self-reported a high level of expertise in using a smartphone (22/24, 91.7%), and sufficient facilitating conditions for using a smartphone were self-reported in both groups (downloaded the app: 23/24, 95.8%; did not download the app: 21/24, 87.5%), suggesting that these factors were not barriers to completion., Conclusions: Despite self-reported intention to use the app, smartphone expertise, and sufficient facilitating conditions for smartphone use, implementation of the mobile app was infeasible for daily practice. This was due to a combination of technical problems, factors related to the implementation process, and the population of interest having cognitive disorders or a dependency on caregivers for mobile technology., (©Merle A J Geerds, Wieke S Nijmeijer, J H Hegeman, Miriam M R Vollenbroek-Hutten. Originally published in JMIR Human Factors (http://humanfactors.jmir.org), 14.09.2020.)
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
30. Hip fracture systems-European experience.
- Author
-
Chesser TJS, Inman D, Johansen A, Belluati A, Pari C, Contini A, Voeten SC, Hegeman JH, Ponsen KJ, Montero-Fernández N, Delgado-Martínez A, and Chana-Rodríguez F
- Abstract
European countries have established health care systems but are struggling with the increasing rise of fragility fractures in their aging population. In trying to address this significant burden, countries are establishing national guidelines and standards, focusing on hip fractures, which represent the significant cost for this patient group. This has evolved with the establishment of national audits and guidelines. Reports from 4 European countries (England, Italy, Netherlands, and Spain) are presented. All nations have identified both deficiencies in their systems, and protocols to improve these deficiences. When standards are introduced, there has been evidence of improved results. Significantly more work is needed to understand the key components of the systems and pathways, and efforts to study and standardize care are ongoing., Competing Interests: The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose., (Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the Orthopaedic Trauma Association.)
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
31. 'Nonagenarians' with a hip fracture: is a different orthogeriatric treatment strategy necessary?
- Author
-
de Groot R, Nijmeijer WS, Folbert EC, Vollenbroek-Hutten MMR, and Hegeman JH
- Subjects
- Activities of Daily Living, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Female, Geriatric Assessment, Hip Fractures physiopathology, Hip Fractures therapy, Humans, Male, Risk Factors, Severity of Illness Index, Treatment Outcome, Age Factors, Hip Fractures mortality, Hospitalization statistics & numerical data
- Abstract
Nonagenarians differ from patients aged 70-79 and 80-89 years in baseline characteristics, complication and mortality rates. Differences increased gradually with age. The results of this study can be used, in combination with the Almelo Hip Fracture Score, to deliver efficiently targeted orthogeriatric treatment to the right patient group., Purpose: In previous literature, elderly with a hip fracture are frequently defined as ≥ 70 years. However, given the ageing population and the rapidly increasing number of 'nonagenarians' (aged ≥ 90 years), the question rises whether this definition is still actual. The aim of this study is to determine whether nonagenarians show differences compared to patients aged 70-79 years and patients aged 80-89 years in terms of patient characteristics, complications and mortality rate., Methods: From April 2008 until December 2016, hip fracture patients aged ≥ 70 years treated according to our orthogeriatric treatment model were included. Patients were divided into three different groups based on age at admission: 70-79 years, 80-89 years and ≥ 90 years. Patient characteristics, risk of early mortality, complications and outcomes were analysed. Risk factors for 30-day mortality in nonagenarians were determined., Results: A total of 1587 patients were included: 465 patients aged 70-80 years, 867 patients aged 80-90 years and 255 patients aged ≥ 90 years. Nonagenarians were more often female and had a lower haemoglobin level at admission. Prefracture, they were more often living in a nursing home, were more dependent in activities of daily living and mobility and had a higher risk of early mortality calculated with the Almelo Hip Fracture Score (AHFS). Post-operative, nonagenarians suffer significantly more often from delirium and anaemia. The 30-day mortality and 1-year mortality were significantly higher. Differences increased gradually with age., Conclusion: Nonagenarians differ from patients aged 70-79 and 80-89 years in baseline characteristics, complication and mortality rates. Differences increased gradually with age. The results of this study can be used, in combination with the Almelo Hip Fracture Score, to deliver efficiently targeted orthogeriatric treatment to the right patient group.
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
32. Validation of the Fracture Mobility Score against the Parker Mobility Score in hip fracture patients.
- Author
-
Voeten SC, Nijmeijer WS, Vermeer M, Schipper IB, and Hegeman JH
- Subjects
- Activities of Daily Living, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Commission on Professional and Hospital Activities standards, Dementia epidemiology, Female, Hip Fractures surgery, Hospitalization, Humans, Male, Netherlands epidemiology, Nutritional Status, Reproducibility of Results, Research Design trends, Hip Fractures physiopathology, Hip Fractures rehabilitation, Range of Motion, Articular physiology, Research Design statistics & numerical data
- Abstract
Introduction: The Parker Mobility Score has proven to be a valid and reliable measurement of hip fracture patient mobility. For hip fracture registries the Fracture Mobility Score is advised and used, although this score has never been validated. This study aims to validate the Fracture Mobility Score against the Parker Mobility Score., Patients and Methods: The Dutch Hip Fracture Audit uses the Fracture Mobility Score (categorical scale). For the purpose of this study, five hospitals registered both the Fracture Mobility Score and the Parker Mobility Score (0-9 scale) for every admitted hip fracture patient in 2018. The Spearman correlation between the two scores was calculated. To test whether the correlation coefficient remained stable among different patient subgroups, analyses were stratified according to baseline patient characteristics., Results: In total 1,201 hip fracture patients were included. The Spearman correlation between the Fracture Mobility Score and Parker Mobility Score was strong: 0.73 (p = < 0.001). Stratified for gender, age, ASA score, dementia, Index of Activities of Daily Living (KATZ-6 ADL score), living situation and nutritional status, the correlation coefficient varied between 0.40-0.84. For patients aged 90 and over and having an ASA score of III-IV who suffered from dementia, had a KATZ-6 ADL score of 1-6, lived in an institution and/or were malnourished, the correlation was moderate., Conclusion: The Fracture Mobility Score is overall strongly correlated with the Parker Mobility Score and can be considered as a valid score to measure hip fracture patient mobility. This may encourage other hip fracture audits to also use the Fracture Mobility Score, which would increase the uniformity of mobility score results among national hip fracture audits and decrease the overall registration load., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest Stijn C Voeten, Wieke S. Nijmeijer, Marloes Vermeer, Inger B. Schipper and J.H (Hegeman) certify that he or she has no commercial associations (eg. consultancies, stock ownership, equity interest, patent/licensing arrangements, etc.) that might pose a conflict of interest in connection with the submitted article., (Copyright © 2019 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
33. Hospital staff participation in a national hip fracture audit: facilitators and barriers.
- Author
-
Voeten SC, van Bodegom-Vos L, Hegeman JH, Wouters MWJM, Krijnen P, and Schipper IB
- Subjects
- Clinical Competence, Female, Health Services Research organization & administration, Humans, Male, Netherlands, Odds Ratio, Postoperative Complications, Surveys and Questionnaires, Hip Fractures surgery, Medical Audit organization & administration, Personnel, Hospital, Work Engagement
- Abstract
To ensure meaningful results in a clinical audit, as many hospitals as possible should participate. To optimise participation, the data collection process should either be performed by additional staff or be automated. Active participation may be promoted by offering relevant external parties insight into the actual quality of care., Purpose: The aim of the study was to identify which facilitators and barriers experienced by hospital staff are associated with participation in the ongoing nationwide multidisciplinary Dutch Hip Fracture Audit (DHFA)., Methods: A survey including questions about the respondents' characteristics, hospital level of participation and factors of influence on DHFA participation was sent to hip fracture surgeons. The factors were based on results of semi-structured interviews held with hospital staff involved in hip fracture care. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to establish which respondent characteristics and factors were associated with participation and active participation (≥ 80% of patients registered) in the DHFA. Factors significantly increasing the (active) participation in the DHFA were classified as facilitators, and factors significantly decreasing the (active) participation in the DHFA as barriers., Results: One hundred nine surgeons filled out the questionnaire. The factors most agreed on were availability of staffing capacity for data collection and automated data import. A lower intention to participate was associated with being an academic surgeon (odds ratio, 0.15; 95% confidence interval, 0.04-0.52) and an orthopaedic surgeon (odds ratio, 0.30; 95% confidence interval, 0.10-0.90). Data sharing with relevant external parties was associated with active participation (odds ratio, 3.19; 95% confidence interval, 1.14-8.95)., Conclusions: To improve participation in a nationwide clinical audit, it seems that the data collection should either be performed by additional staff or be automated. Active participation is facilitated if audit data is made available to other parties, such as insurers, healthcare authorities or policymakers.
- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
34. The consistency of care for older patients with a hip fracture: are the results of the integrated orthogeriatric treatment model of the Centre of Geriatric Traumatology consistent 10 years after implementation?
- Author
-
Nijmeijer WS, Folbert EC, Vermeer M, Vollenbroek-Hutten MMR, and Hegeman JH
- Subjects
- Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Delivery of Health Care, Integrated methods, Delivery of Health Care, Integrated standards, Female, Health Services for the Aged standards, Hip Fractures therapy, Humans, Length of Stay, Male, Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care, Traumatology methods, Traumatology standards, Delivery of Health Care, Integrated statistics & numerical data, Health Plan Implementation statistics & numerical data, Health Services for the Aged statistics & numerical data, Hip Fractures mortality, Traumatology statistics & numerical data
- Abstract
In the past 10 years after implementation, the orthogeriatric treatment model led in general to consistent outcomes for 1555 older adults in terms of most of the complications and mortality. Surgery was more often delayed to 24-48 h after arrival at the hospital, while the length of hospital stay shortened., Introduction: Since 1 April 2008, patients aged ≥ 70 years presenting themselves with a hip fracture at Ziekenhuisgroep Twente (ZGT) have been treated according to the orthogeriatric treatment model. The aim of this study was to investigate if outcomes of the orthogeriatric treatment model are consistent over the first 10 years after implementation., Methods: Between 1 April 2008 and 31 December 2016, patients aged ≥ 70 years who were surgically treated at ZGT for a hip fracture were included and divided into three periods equally distributed in time. Patient characteristics, in-hospital logistics, complications, and mortality data were compared between the three periods., Results: A total of 1555 patients were included. There was a shift in the surgical treatment for the fractured neck of femur from dynamic hip screw/cannulated screws to hemiarthroplasty (p < 0.001). Surgery within 24 h after arrival to the hospital decreased (p < 0.001), while surgery within 48 h stayed the same (p = 0.085). Length of hospital stay significantly decreased over time (p < 0.001). Complication rates were consistent except for the number of postoperative anemia, delirium, and urinary tract infections. Mortality rates did not change over the years., Conclusions: The orthogeriatric treatment model leads in general to consistent outcomes concerning mortality and most of the complications, except for postoperative anemia, delirium, and urinary tract infections. Inconsistent complication rates were influenced by altered diagnosis and treatment protocols. Length of hospital stay reduced, while time to surgery was more often delayed to 24-48 h. Monitoring clinical outcomes of the orthogeriatric treatment model over time is recommended in order to optimize and maintain the quality of care for this frail patient population.
- Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
35. Quality indicators for hip fracture care, a systematic review.
- Author
-
Voeten SC, Krijnen P, Voeten DM, Hegeman JH, Wouters MWJM, and Schipper IB
- Subjects
- Benchmarking, Evidence-Based Medicine methods, Humans, Medical Audit, Outcome Assessment, Health Care methods, Practice Guidelines as Topic, Delivery of Health Care standards, Hip Fractures therapy, Osteoporotic Fractures therapy, Quality Indicators, Health Care
- Abstract
Quality indicators are used to measure quality of care and enable benchmarking. An overview of all existing hip fracture quality indicators is lacking. The primary aim was to identify quality indicators for hip fracture care reported in literature, hip fracture audits, and guidelines. The secondary aim was to compose a set of methodologically sound quality indicators for the evaluation of hip fracture care in clinical practice. A literature search according to the PRISMA guidelines and an internet search were performed to identify hip fracture quality indicators. The indicators were subdivided into process, structure, and outcome indicators. The methodological quality of the indicators was judged using the Appraisal of Indicators through Research and Evaluation (AIRE) instrument. For structure and process indicators, the construct validity was assessed. Sixteen publications, nine audits and five guidelines were included. In total, 97 unique quality indicators were found: 9 structure, 63 process, and 25 outcome indicators. Since detailed methodological information about the indicators was lacking, the AIRE instrument could not be applied. Seven indicators correlated with an outcome measure. A set of nine quality indicators was extracted from the literature, audits, and guidelines. Many quality indicators are described and used. Not all of them correlate with outcomes of care and have been assessed methodologically. As methodological evidence is lacking, we recommend the extracted set of nine indicators to be used as the starting point for further clinical research. Future research should focus on assessing the clinimetric properties of the existing quality indicators.
- Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
36. Author's reply to 'Letter to the Editor: Use of Almelo Hip Fracture Score to predict early mortality following hip fracture surgery'.
- Author
-
Nijmeijer WS, Folbert EC, and Hegeman JH
- Subjects
- Humans, Hip Fractures, Pelvic Bones
- Published
- 2017
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
37. Complications during hospitalization and risk factors in elderly patients with hip fracture following integrated orthogeriatric treatment.
- Author
-
Folbert EC, Hegeman JH, Gierveld R, van Netten JJ, Velde DV, Ten Duis HJ, and Slaets JP
- Subjects
- Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Arrhythmias, Cardiac epidemiology, Female, Geriatrics, Heart Failure epidemiology, Hospitalization, Humans, Incidence, Logistic Models, Male, Multivariate Analysis, Myocardial Infarction, Netherlands epidemiology, Orthopedics, Patient Care Team, Pneumonia epidemiology, Pulmonary Embolism epidemiology, Renal Insufficiency epidemiology, Risk Factors, Stroke epidemiology, Surgical Wound Infection epidemiology, Anemia epidemiology, Catheter-Related Infections epidemiology, Delirium epidemiology, Hip Fractures surgery, Hospital Mortality, Postoperative Complications epidemiology, Urinary Tract Infections epidemiology
- Abstract
Introduction: This study aimed to evaluate the incidence of complications in elderly patients with a hip fracture following integrated orthogeriatric treatment. To discover factors that might be adjusted, in order to improve outcome in those patients, we examined the association between baseline patient characteristics and a complicated course., Methods: We included patients aged 70 years and older with a hip fracture, who were treated at the Centre for Geriatric Traumatology (CvGT) at Ziekenhuisgroep Twente (ZGT) Almelo, the Netherlands between April 2011 and October 2013. Data registration was carried out using the clinical pathways of the CvGT database. Based on the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score, patients were divided into high-risk (HR, ASA 3 ≥, n = 341) and low-risk (LR, ASA 1-2, n = 111) groups and compared on their recovery. Multivariate logistic regression was used to identify risk factors for a complicated course., Results: The analysis demonstrated that 49.6% (n = 224) of the patients experienced a complicated course with an in-hospital mortality rate of 3.8% (n = 17). In 57.5% (n = 196) of the HR patients, a complicated course was seen compared to 25.2% (n = 28) of the LR patients. The most common complications in both groups were the occurrence of delirium (HR 25.8% vs. LR 8.1%, p ≤ 0.001), anemia (HR 19.4% vs. LR 6.3%, p = 0.001), catheter-associated urinary tract infections (CAUTIs) (HR 10.6% vs. LR 7.2%, p = 0.301) and pneumonia (HR 10.9% vs. LR 5.4%, p = 0.089). Independent risk factors for a complicated course were increasing age (OR 1.04, 95% CI 1.01-1.07, p = 0.023), delirium risk VMS Frailty score (OR 1.57, 95% CI 1.04-2.37, p = 0.031) and ASA score ≥3 (OR 3.62, 95% CI 2.22-5.91, p ≤ 0.001)., Conclusions: After integrated orthogeriatric treatment, a complicated course was seen in 49.6% of the patients with a hip fracture. The in-hospital mortality rate was 3.8%. Important risk factors for a complicated course were increasing age, poor medical condition and delirium risk VMS Frailty score. Awareness of risk factors that affect the course during admission can be useful in optimizing care and outcomes. In the search for possible areas for improvement in care, targeted preventive measures to mitigate delirium, and healthcare-associated infections (HAIs), such as CAUTIs and pneumonia are important.
- Published
- 2017
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
38. Improved 1-year mortality in elderly patients with a hip fracture following integrated orthogeriatric treatment.
- Author
-
Folbert EC, Hegeman JH, Vermeer M, Regtuijt EM, van der Velde D, Ten Duis HJ, and Slaets JP
- Subjects
- Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Delivery of Health Care, Integrated standards, Female, Fracture Fixation methods, Frail Elderly, Geriatric Assessment, Health Services for the Aged standards, Hip Fractures therapy, Humans, Male, Netherlands epidemiology, Osteoporotic Fractures therapy, Prospective Studies, Quality Improvement organization & administration, Risk Factors, Trauma Centers organization & administration, Trauma Centers standards, Treatment Outcome, Delivery of Health Care, Integrated organization & administration, Health Services for the Aged organization & administration, Hip Fractures mortality, Osteoporotic Fractures mortality
- Abstract
To improve the quality of care and reduce the healthcare costs of elderly patients with a hip fracture, surgeons and geriatricians collaborated intensively due to the special needs of these patients. After treatment at the Centre for Geriatric Traumatology (CvGT), we found a significant decrease in the 1-year mortality rate in frail elderly patients compared to the historical control patients who were treated with standard care., Introduction: The study aimed to evaluate the effect of an orthogeriatric treatment model on elderly patients with a hip fracture on the 1-year mortality rate and identify associated risk factors., Methods: This study included patients, aged 70 years and older, who were admitted with a hip fracture and treated in accordance with the integrated orthogeriatric treatment model of the CvGT at the Hospital Group Twente (ZGT) between April 2008 and October 2013. Data registration was carried out by several disciplines using the clinical pathways of the CvGT database. A multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to identify independent risk factors for 1-year mortality. The outcome measures for the 850 patients were compared with those of 535 historical control patients who were managed under standard care between October 2002 and March 2008., Results: The analysis demonstrated that the 1-year mortality rate was 23.2 % (n = 197) in the CvGT group compared to 35.1 % (n = 188) in the historical control group (p < 0.001). Independent risk factors for 1-year mortality were male gender (odds ratio (OR) 1.68), increasing age (OR 1.06), higher American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score (ASA 3 OR 2.43, ASA 4-5 OR 7.05), higher Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) (CCI 1-2 OR 1.46, CCI 3-4 OR 1.59, CCI 5 OR 2.71), malnutrition (OR 2.01), physical limitations in activities of daily living (OR 2.35), and decreasing Barthel Index (BI) (OR 0.96)., Conclusion: After integrated orthogeriatric treatment, a significant decrease was seen in the 1-year mortality rate in the frail elderly patients with a hip fracture compared to the historical control patients who were treated with standard care. The most important risk factors for 1-year mortality were male gender, increasing age, malnutrition, physical limitations, increasing BI, and medical conditions. Awareness of risk factors that affect the 1-year mortality can be useful in optimizing care and outcomes. Orthogeriatric treatment should be standard for elderly patients with hip fractures due to the multidimensional needs of these patients.
- Published
- 2017
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
39. Prediction of early mortality following hip fracture surgery in frail elderly: The Almelo Hip Fracture Score (AHFS).
- Author
-
Nijmeijer WS, Folbert EC, Vermeer M, Slaets JP, and Hegeman JH
- Subjects
- Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Comorbidity, Female, Hip Fractures physiopathology, Hospital Mortality, Humans, Male, Netherlands epidemiology, Predictive Value of Tests, Risk Assessment, Risk Factors, Fracture Fixation, Internal mortality, Frail Elderly, Hip Fractures mortality, Hip Fractures surgery, Postoperative Complications mortality
- Abstract
Background: Hip fractures are common in the elderly and have a high risk of early mortality. Identification of patients at high risk of early mortality could contribute to enhanced quality of care. A simple scoring system is essential for preoperative identification of patients at high risk of early mortality in clinical practice. Of risk models published, The Nottingham Hip Fracture Score (NHFS) shows the most promising results so far. However, there is still room for improvement., Methods: A cohort study including 850 patients was conducted over a period of 5,5 yr. The NHFS was adjusted for cognitive impairment (NHFS-a) and tested. Patients who died within 30days following hip fracture surgery (early mortality group) were compared to survivors. Independent risk factors for early mortality were assessed. A new hip fracture score for frail elderly was developed: the Almelo Hip Fracture Score (AHFS). The NHFS-a and the AHFS were compared for accuracy and predictive validity., Results: Sixty-four (7.5%) patients died within 30days following hip fracture surgery. The AHFS predicts the risk of early mortality better than the NHFS-a (p<0.05). Using cut-off points of AHFS ≤ 9 and AHFS ≥ 13, patients could be divided into a low, medium or high risk group. The area under the curve improved with the AHFS compared to the NHFS-a (0.82 versus 0.72). The likelihood ratio test reveals a significantly better fit of the AHFS in comparison with the NHFS-a (p<0.001)., Conclusions: The AHFS can identify frail elderly at high risk of early mortality following hip fracture surgery accurately. With the AHFS, the patient can be classified into the low, medium or high risk group, which contributes to enhanced quality of care in clinical practice., (Copyright © 2016. Published by Elsevier Ltd.)
- Published
- 2016
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
40. Use of Calscan for improving osteoporosis care in the older patient admitted with hip fracture.
- Author
-
De Klerk G, Hegeman JH, Van Der Velde D, Van Der Palen J, and Ten Duis HJ
- Subjects
- Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Bone Density, Female, Humans, Male, Mass Screening methods, Osteoporotic Fractures surgery, Absorptiometry, Photon methods, Calcaneus diagnostic imaging, Hip Fractures surgery, Osteoporosis diagnosis, Radiography methods
- Abstract
To determine whether bone mineral density measurement using the Calscan successfully predicts the actual bone mineral density, as measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. We included all patients≥65 years with a hip fracture screened on osteoporosis by both dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and the Calscan during the period April 2008 to April 2011. The bone mineral density was expressed as a T-score. For the Calscan T-score, thresholds were defined such that patients with and without osteoporosis could be identified with 90% certainty. Patients with a Calscan T-score above the upper threshold were considered to be non-osteoporotic and those with a Calscan T-score below the lower threshold considered osteoporotic. Patients whose Calscan T-score lay between the two thresholds could only be classified by means of DXA. The correlation between dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and the Calscan was 0.61. The Calscan identified approximately 25% of patients as osteoporotic and 25% as non-osteoporotic. The upper threshold was found to be -1.8SD and the lower threshold -3.5SD. Osteoporosis screening by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry had been carried out in 44% of patients. This percentage could theoretically rise to >70% if the Calscan is implemented in osteoporosis screening, while costs of such screening appear to be lower, as long as a sufficient number of patients are screened.
- Published
- 2015
41. Thoracolumbar spine fractures in the geriatric fracture center: early ambulation leads to good results on short term and is a successful and safe alternative compared to immobilization in elderly patients with two-column vertebral fractures.
- Author
-
Weerink LB, Folbert EC, Kraai M, Smit RS, Hegeman JH, and van der Velde D
- Abstract
Introduction: Thoracolumbar spine fractures are common osteoporotic fractures among elderly patients. Several studies suggest that these fractures can be treated successfully with a nonoperative management. The aim of this study is to evaluate the conservative treatment of elderly patients with a vertebral fracture., Methods: This study is a retrospective cohort study, which included all patients with an age of 65 years and older, who were diagnosed with a vertebral fracture and where therefore admitted to the Geriatric Fracture Center over a period of 2 years. Primary outcome was the level of functioning 6 weeks and 3 months after admission., Results: We included 106 patients with 143 vertebral fractures, of which 61 patients were evaluated after 3 months. In our population, 53% of the patients had a fracture involving both middle and anterior columns. The majority of the patients functioned sufficiently 6 weeks and 3 months after admission. Analysis showed that age <80 years is an independent predictor of a sufficient level of functioning after 6 weeks., Discussion: The nonoperative treatment of elderly patients with a vertebral fracture leads to a sufficient level of functioning 6 weeks and 3 months after admission. In our population, only age <80 years is an independent predictor for a sufficient level of functioning 6 weeks after admission. The level of functioning at 6 weeks predicts the level of functioning 3 months after admission. On comparison, the level of functioning after early ambulation is equal to the level of functioning after immobilization. Where immobilization may lead to complications, early ambulation was not associated with new complications or neurological damage. Based on these advantages, the treatment of elderly patients with a fracture involving both middle and anterior columns may be altered from immobilization to mobilization in the future.
- Published
- 2014
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
42. The value of laboratory tests in diagnosing secondary osteoporosis at a fracture and osteoporosis outpatient clinic.
- Author
-
de Klerk G, Hegeman JH, van der Velde D, van der Palen J, van Bergeijk L, and Duis HJ
- Abstract
Background: As more and more patients meeting the criteria for osteoporosis are referred to a fracture and osteoporosis outpatient clinic (FO clinic), the laboratory costs to screen for secondary osteoporosis also increases. This study was conducted to determine the value of screening on underlying diseases at an FO clinic by obtaining a standard set of laboratory tests., Methods: We included all 541 patients ≥50 years with a fracture referred to our FO clinic, during the period January 2005 to January 2007. The bone mineral density (BMD) was measured by dual energy x-ray absorptiometry and expressed as a T score. A standard set of laboratory tests was obtained to screen on underlying diseases., Results: Laboratory results were as often abnormal in patients with a normal BMD compared to patients with a low BMD. Underlying diseases were infrequently diagnosed. However, the prevalence of secondary osteoporosis in men was quite high, up to 18.2%. The costs to diagnose 1 patient with an underlying disease did vary between €92 and €972 depending on the group of patients described., Conclusion: Screening all patients, referred to an FO clinic, for underlying diseases by obtaining a standard set of laboratory tests is probably not useful since laboratory tests are as often abnormal in patients with a normal BMD compared to patients with a low BMD. Moreover, the prevalence of secondary osteoporosis is low, while laboratory costs are substantial.
- Published
- 2013
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
43. Geriatric fracture center: a multidisciplinary treatment approach for older patients with a hip fracture improved quality of clinical care and short-term treatment outcomes.
- Author
-
Folbert EC, Smit RS, van der Velde D, Regtuijt EM, Klaren MH, and Hegeman JH
- Abstract
Objective: Since April 1, 2008, patients aged ≥65 years presenting with a hip fracture at Ziekenhuisgroep Twente, Almelo (ZGT-A), The Netherlands, have been admitted to the geriatric fracture center (GFC) and treated according to the multidisciplinary treatment approach. The objective of this study was to evaluate how implementation of the treatment approach has influenced the quality of care given to older patients with hip fracture., Design: Prospective cohort study with historical control group., Method: Two groups of patients with hip fracture were compared, 1 group was treated according to the new multidisciplinary treatment approach in 2009-2010, and the other group received the usual treatment in 2007-2008. The number of readmissions within 30 days after discharge was compared, and an analysis was carried out regarding the number of complications, the number of consultations with various specialists and with the geriatrician, and the duration of hospital stay., Results: In all, 140 patients from 2009 to 2010 group and 90 patients from 2007 to 2008 group were included. In 2009-2010 group, the number of readmissions within 30 days dropped by 11 percentage points (P = .001). The incidence of the number of complications decreased with a median of 1 compared with 2007-2008 (P = .017) group. Delirium was diagnosed to be 6 percentage points more frequent. The median number of consultations with various specialists per patient decreased by 1 percentage point as a result of geriatrician cotreatment (P = .002). The median duration of hospital stay was 1 day shorter than that in 2007-2008 group., Conclusion: The use of the multidisciplinary treatment approach led to a significant reduction in the number of readmissions within 30 days after discharge. It appears to be associated with improved short-term treatment outcomes for older patients with a hip fracture.
- Published
- 2012
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
44. The (a)-Symptomatic Vertebral Fracture: A Frequently Discovered Entity With Clinical Relevance in Fracture Patients Screened on Osteoporosis.
- Author
-
de Klerk G, Hegeman JH, Bronkhorst P, van der Palen J, van der Velde D, and Duis HJ
- Abstract
Objective: Description of the prevalence of vertebral fractures in a fracture and osteoporosis outpatient clinic (FO-Clinic) and evaluation of the value of spinal radiographs by screening on osteoporosis., Design: Retrospective data collection, description, and analysis., Methods: All patients admitted to the FO-Clinic during the period of December 2005 until October 2006 were enrolled in this study. At the FO-Clinic spinal radiographs were obtained and bone mineral density (BMD) was measured by Dual energy X-ray-Absorptiometry (DXA)., Results: During the study period, a total of 176 patients were screened at our FO-Clinic. In 41.5% of these patients, a vertebral fracture was diagnosed. There appeared to be an indication for anti-osteoporotic medication in 95 of the 176 patients. Of these 95 patients, 77% could be identified by spinal radiographs. Moreover, only 36% of all patients with a vertebral fracture did suffer from osteoporosis., Conclusion: The prevalence of vertebral fractures in patients screened at an FO-Clinic is high and spinal radiographs can identify up to 77% of patients in which anti-osteoporotic medication should be considered. However, fracture risk is not only dependent on bone quality but also on bone density. Therefore, the preferred method of screening on osteoporosis is DXA with vertebral fracture assessment and, if necessary, spinal radiographs. If DXA is not available, spinal radiographs might be used as a first step in osteoporosis screening.
- Published
- 2012
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
45. Implementation of osteoporosis guidelines: a survey of five large fracture liaison services in the Netherlands.
- Author
-
Huntjens KM, van Geel TA, Blonk MC, Hegeman JH, van der Elst M, Willems P, Geusens PP, Winkens B, Brink P, and van Helden SH
- Subjects
- Aged, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Netherlands, Practice Guidelines as Topic, Preventive Health Services statistics & numerical data, Prospective Studies, Risk Factors, Guideline Adherence statistics & numerical data, Osteoporosis complications, Osteoporotic Fractures prevention & control, Preventive Health Services standards
- Abstract
Summary: Implementation of case findings according to guidelines for osteoporosis in fracture patients presenting at a Fracture Liaison Service (FLS) was evaluated. Despite one guideline, all FLSs differed in the performance of patient selection and prevalence of clinical risk factors (CRFs) indicating the need for more concrete and standardised guidelines., Introduction: The aim of the study was to evaluate the implementation of case findings according to guidelines for osteoporosis in fracture patients presenting at FLSs in the Netherlands., Methods: Five FLSs were contacted to participate in this prospective study. Patients older than 50 years with a recent clinical fracture who were able and were willing to participate in fracture risk evaluation were included. Performance was evaluated by criteria for patient recruitment, patient characteristics, nurse time, evaluated clinical risk factors (CRFs), bone mineral density (BMD) and laboratory testing and results of CRFs and BMD are presented. Differences between FLSs were analysed for performance (by chi-square and Student's t test) and for prevalence of CRFs (by relative risks (RR))., Results: All FLSs had a dedicated nurse spending 0.9 to 1.7 h per patient. During 39 to 58 months follow-up, 7,199 patients were evaluated (15 to 47 patients/centre/month; mean age, 67 years; 77% women). Major differences were found between FLSs in the performance of patient recruitment, evaluation of CRFs, BMD and laboratory testing, varying between 0% and 100%. The prevalence of CRFs and osteoporosis varied significantly between FLSs (RR between 1.7 and 37.0, depending on the risk factor)., Conclusion: All five participating FLSs with a dedicated fracture nurse differed in the performance of patient selection, CRFs and in the prevalence of CRFs, indicating the need for more concrete and standardised guidelines to organise evaluation of patients at the time of fracture in daily practice.
- Published
- 2011
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
46. [Multidisciplinary integrated care pathway for elderly patients with hip fractures: implementation results from Centre for Geriatric Traumatology, Almelo, The Netherlands].
- Author
-
Folbert E, Smit R, van der Velde D, Regtuijt M, Klaren H, and Hegeman JH
- Subjects
- Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Cohort Studies, Female, Hip Fractures complications, Hip Fractures mortality, Hip Fractures rehabilitation, Hospitalization, Humans, Length of Stay, Male, Netherlands, Retrospective Studies, Treatment Outcome, Health Services for the Aged standards, Hip Fractures therapy, Interdisciplinary Communication, Patient Care Team
- Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the effects of the implementation of a multidisciplinary treatment approach at Hospital Group Twente in Almelo, Netherlands, of hip fracture patients aged 65 years and older., Design: Historical comparative cohort study., Method: Two groups of patients with hip fractures were retrospectively compared. One of these groups had been treated in 2009 according to the new, multidisciplinary treatment approach; the other in 2007 by usual means. Observations included the duration of hospital stay, as well as the numbers of complications, readmissions and consultations by other specialities., Results: Included were 101 patients from 2009 and 69 from 2007. In 2009, the mean duration of hospital stay was 1 day longer than in 2007. Patients admitted to a nursing home for rehabilitation increased by 16 percentage points. The incidence of minor complications decreased by 7 percentage points; that of severe complications, 5 percentage points. The diagnosis of delirium was made significantly more often (15 percentage points more; p-value: 0.051). The rate of death decreased by 5 percentage points. The number of readmissions within 30 days declined by 14 percentage points (p-value: 0.001). Due to geriatric co-treatment (co-managed care), consultations by various specialities were fewer per patient., Conclusion: No reduction in the duration of hospital stay was achieved by implementation of the multidisciplinary treatment approach. It did appear that a relationship with better short-term treatment outcomes for the elderly with hip fractures existed.
- Published
- 2011
47. The usefulness of dual energy X-ray and laser absorptiometry of the calcaneus versus dual energy X-ray absorptiometry of hip and spine in diagnosing manifest osteoporosis.
- Author
-
de Klerk G, van der Velde D, van der Palen J, van Bergeijk L, and Hegeman JH
- Subjects
- Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Predictive Value of Tests, Absorptiometry, Photon methods, Calcaneus, Hip, Osteoporosis diagnosis, Spine
- Abstract
Introduction: Osteoporosis is a major health problem. Dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) of the hip and spine is the worldwide standard in diagnosing osteoporosis. Measurement of bone mineral density (BMD) with dual energy X-ray and laser absorptiometry of the calcaneus (Calscan) might be a good alternative. Advantages of the Calscan are that it is quick, widely available and manageable. In this study we compared BMD expressed in T-scores measured by DXA and Calscan. The aim of this study was to define threshold T-scores on the Calscan that could exclude or predict osteoporosis correctly in comparison with DXA., Materials and Methods: Patients > or =50 years attending our emergency department with a fracture were offered osteoporosis screening at our fracture and osteoporosis outpatient clinic (FO-Clinic) and enrolled in this study. BMD was measured at the hip and spine using DXA and at the calcaneus using Calscan. A T-score measured by DXA < or =-2 standard deviations (SD) below the reference population was defined as manifest osteoporosis and was the treatment threshold., Results: During a 10-month study period, 182 patients were screened with both devices. The mean DXA-T-score was -1.63 SD (range -4.9 to 2.1) and Calscan T-score -1.91 SD (range -5.3 to 1.4). There was a significant correlation between both devices (r = 0.47, P < 0.01). Using an upper threshold for the Calscan T-score of -1.3 SD, 47 patients could be classified as non-osteoporotic with 89.3% sensitivity (95% CI 80.0-95.3%). Using a lower threshold for the Calscan T-score of -2.9 SD, 34 patients could be classified by the Calscan as osteoporotic with 90.7% specificity (95% CI 83.5-95.4). The remaining 101 patients could only be correctly classified by DXA-T-scores., Conclusion: Although DXA is the established modality worldwide in measuring BMD it is restricted to specialized centres. Peripheral bone densitometers like the Calscan are widely available. When BMD measurements with DXA were compared to Calscan measurements it was possible to correctly classify 81 of 182 patients based on the Calscan T-score. Of these 81 patients 34 could be classified as manifest osteoporotic and 47 as non-osteoporotic. Therefore the Calscan seems to be a promising technique which might be used as a screening device at a FO-Clinic, especially when DXA is not easily available.
- Published
- 2009
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
48. Follow-up for osteoporosis in older patients three years after a fracture.
- Author
-
Schurink M, Hegeman JH, Kreeftenberg HG, and Ten Duis HJ
- Subjects
- Absorptiometry, Photon, Age Factors, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Bone Density, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Fractures, Bone prevention & control, Health Surveys, Humans, Male, Mass Screening, Middle Aged, Netherlands, Osteoporosis diagnosis, Osteoporosis prevention & control, Prospective Studies, Risk Factors, Surveys and Questionnaires, Time Factors, Fractures, Bone etiology, Osteoporosis complications, Practice Guidelines as Topic
- Abstract
Background: Recently a Fracture and Osteoporosis outpatient clinic (FO clinic) was set up at the University Medical Centre groningen (UMCG) with the aim to optimise case-finding of osteoporosis in older patients with a low-energy fracture. To provide a diagnostic setting before the start of our fo clinic, case-finding was carried out in patients who suffered an 'osteoporotic' fracture in the year prior to the foundation of the FO clinic. During a three years follow up project, osteoporotic patients who needed therapy were identified., Methods: Patients aged 50 years or older who were seen in the UMCG for a low-energy fracture (shoulder, wrist or hip) one year before that period were asked to participate. The study was carried out in two parts - a telephone questionnaire and measurement of the bone mineral density (BMD). The data were compared with the results of the FO clinic., Results: Of the 191 patients, 88 could be contacted and were analysed. of these 88 patients only 12 had undergone additional investigations for the presence of osteoporosis in the year of the fracture, and only six patients were on antiosteoporosis medication; 45 patients had already suffered an earlier fracture and ten had a more recent subsequent fracture. Measurements three years after their fracture revealed that 55% of the 88 patients had osteoporosis (T-score less than -2.5 SD)., Conclusion: After a fracture, case-finding for osteoporosis is good clinical practice. In our study more than half of the patients were lost for follow-up after three years. But it is still worthwhile to check whether patients with fractures in the past had the necessary diagnostics and proper therapy. Comparing these results with those of the FO clinic, it is evident, however, that case-finding of osteoporosis after a fracture can be organised most effectively at the location where the patient first attends for treatment of the fracture, namely in the emergency department of the hospital.
- Published
- 2007
49. External fixation for unstable intra-articular distal radial fractures in women older than 55 years. Acceptable functional end results in the majority of the patients despite significant secondary displacement.
- Author
-
Hegeman JH, Oskam J, Vierhout PA, and Ten Duis HJ
- Subjects
- Accidental Falls, Aged, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Fracture Fixation adverse effects, Fractures, Comminuted diagnostic imaging, Fractures, Comminuted rehabilitation, Fractures, Malunited etiology, Humans, Middle Aged, Radiography, Radius Fractures diagnostic imaging, Radius Fractures rehabilitation, Range of Motion, Articular, Treatment Outcome, Wrist Injuries diagnostic imaging, Wrist Injuries rehabilitation, Wrist Joint physiopathology, External Fixators, Fracture Fixation methods, Fractures, Comminuted surgery, Radius Fractures surgery, Wrist Injuries surgery
- Abstract
Unlabelled: Unstable intra-articular distal radial fractures in women older than 55 years were treated by closed reduction and external fixation to achieve the best functional outcome. Sixteen women had radiographic and functional assessment. Despite initial good alignment secondary displacement occurred in 11 patients, probably due to the comminution of the fracture and possibly influenced by osteoporosis. Malunion of the distal radius was seen in two patients and intra-articular incongruity with an intra-articular step exceeding 1 mm was observed in two other patients. The functional outcome was excellent or good in 10 and fair in two patients. Four patients had a poor functional outcome. Two of these patients had a significant loss of reduction, one resulting in a malunion. The other two had an intra-articular incongruity of more than 1 mm. Three of the four patients with a poor functional outcome had clinical signs of reflex sympathetic dystrophy., Conclusion: Closed reduction and external fixation of "bad case" severely comminuted unstable distal radial fractures in the elderly may result in an acceptable functional outcome in the majority of the cases, although significant secondary displacement occurred in eleven of the sixteen patients.
- Published
- 2005
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
50. [Effective tracing of osteoporosis at a fracture and osteoporosis clinic in Groningen; an analysis of the first 100 patients].
- Author
-
Hegeman JH, Willemsen G, van Nieuwpoort J, Kreeftenberg HG, van der Veer E, Slaets JP, and ten Duis HJ
- Subjects
- 25-Hydroxyvitamin D 2 blood, Absorptiometry, Photon, Fractures, Bone pathology, Humans, Middle Aged, Netherlands epidemiology, Osteoporosis blood, Osteoporosis epidemiology, Prevalence, Risk Factors, Bone Density, Fractures, Bone diagnostic imaging, Osteoporosis diagnosis
- Abstract
Objective: To analyse the results from a fracture and osteoporosis (FO) outpatient clinic in order to achieve efficient case-finding for osteoporosis in patients of 50 years and older with a fracture due to low-energy trauma., Design: Descriptive., Method: Following the publication of new professional guidelines for case-finding and treatment of osteoporosis, an FO outpatient clinic was opened at the University Hospital of Groningen, The Netherlands, to which patients of 50 years and older with a fracture due to low-energy trauma could be referred for further diagnosis and treatment after initial treatment for trauma. Bone-mineral density of the lumbar spine, hip and distal radius was assessed with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA). Patients with manifest osteoporosis, defined as having a fracture and a T-score < or = -2 SD at one of the measured sites, were put on medication. The results from the first 100 patients were analysed., Results: In the first five months 74% (116/156) of the patients were seen in the FO clinic. In January 2004 the first 100 patients completed the diagnostic process. A total of 67 patients had manifest osteoporosis, 20 osteopenia and 13 had normal bone density. Furthermore, 48% of the patients between 50 and 60 years old had manifest osteoporosis. Unrecognised vertebral fractures were found in 21 patients. Forty-three percent of patients with manifest osteoporosis had low 25-OH-vitamine D levels (< 30 nmol/l). Eleven patients were sent to the Department of Internal Medicine on indication of secondary osteoporosis., Conclusion: The FO outpatient clinic proved to be effective and useful for identifying and treating a population at risk of osteoporosis.
- Published
- 2004
Catalog
Discovery Service for Jio Institute Digital Library
For full access to our library's resources, please sign in.