Search

Purpose The purpose of this study was to outline the feasibility of continuous epidural analgesia in the treatment of failed back surgery syndrome (FBSS) or spinal stenosis. Methods We queried our prospective collected institutional database to include all consecutive patients, who underwent continuous epidural analgesia with accompanying intensive physiotherapeutic exercise within a timeframe of 4 years. Patients suffered from FBSS or spinal stenosis; protocolled continuous epidural analgesia was planned for 4 days within the framework of an inpatient multimodal pain therapy concept. The instillation technique of the epidural catheter, the capability to attend in accompanying physiotherapy, and the peri-interventional complications were evaluated. Results 153 patients with an average age of 57.4 years (± 11.9) were enrolled in this study. 105 patients suffered from FBSS and 48 patients had spinal stenosis. Overall, 148 patients (96.7%) reported the pain reduction and were able to perform daily intensified physiotherapeutic exercise. There were no serious adverse events, neither infection nor bleeding, no cardiopulmonary complication or permanent neurological deficits. The most common side effect was neurological impairment, such as numbness, dysesthesia, or weakness of the lower limbs with complete regression after flow rate adjustment. Patients with FBSS were more likely to develop dysesthesia (p = 0.007). Conclusions Continuous epidural analgesia is feasible in patients with FBSS or spinal stenosis. This treatment enables extensive physiotherapeutic treatment even in patients with severe pain conditions and can be considered as an alternative to epidural injections. An increased complication rate in comparison to short-term perioperative or perinatal application was not observed., Author(s): Vincent J. Heck [sup.1] [sup.2], Bastian Himpe [sup.1] [sup.3], Paul Kessler [sup.1] [sup.4], Asem Almajali [sup.5], Tobias Prasse [sup.2], Sven Schmidt [sup.1] [sup.6], Michael Rauschmann [sup.1] [sup.6] Author Affiliations: [...]

Study Design: A prospective experimental study. Purpose: This biomechanical in vitro study aimed to examine the extent to which the use of a rod persuader (RP) leads to additional mechanical stress on the screw–rod system and determine its influence on the bony anchoring of primary pedicle screws. Overview of Literature: Degenerative spine diseases and deformities are the most common indications for the stabilization and fusion of spinal segments. The pedicle screw–rod system is considered the gold standard for dorsal stabilization, and an RP is also increasingly being considered to fit the spondylodesis material. Methods: Ten lumbar spines from body donors were examined. Bisegmental dorsal spinal lumbar interbody fusion of the L3–L5 segments was performed using a pedicle screw–rod system (ROCCIA Multi-LIF Cage; Silony Medical, Germany). In group 1, the titanium rod was inserted without tension, whereas in group 2, the rod was attached to the pedicle screws at the L4 and L5 levels, creating a 5-mm gap. To attach the rod, the RP was used to press the rod into the pedicle screw. The rod was left in place for 30 minutes and then removed. Results: The rod reduction technique significantly increased the mechanical load on the overall construct measured by strain gauges (p<0.05) and resulted in outright implant failure with pedicle screw pullout in 88.9%. Conclusions: In cases where the spondylodesis material is not fully attached within the pedicle screw, an RP can be used with extreme caution, particularly in osteoporotic bones, to avoid pedicle screw avulsion and screw anchor failure. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Overview of the literature - Fractures of the C1 constitute 3%-13% of all cervical spine injuries in adults. Most isolated C1 fractures are stable and can be treated nonoperatively with external immobilization. Traditional surgical options for C1 fracture treatment are occiput-to-C2 fusion or C1 with lateral mass screws (LMSs). Purpose - The aim is to assess the management and perioperative complications of C1 fractures undergoing LMS fusion between fluoroscopy and computed tomography (CT)-guided navigation. Methods: This was a retrospective multicenter study of data from the DWG-Register of patients who underwent operative treatment for C1 traumatic fracture with LMSs from January 2017 to September 2022. Inclusion criteria - traumatic injury and age > 18 years old. Results: In total, 202 patients with traumatic C1 fracture requiring spinal surgery were identified in the registry; n = 175 (Group 1) were treated conventionally without CT-guided navigation and n = 27 were treated with CT-guided navigation (Group 2). C1-LMS was principally performed by spine surgeons n = 90 (53.4%) and n = 72 (18.5%) by neurosurgeons in both the groups. Intraoperative adverse events were as follows: dural tear in group 1 n = 0 and in group 2 n = 1, vascular injury, with one case in group 1 and no cases in group 2. General complications were: cardiovasculars in group 1 n = 6 (3.4%) and Group 2 n = 4 (14.8%) (P = 0.03), pulmonary complications in group1 n = 2 (1.1%) and n = 9 in group 2 (33.3%) (P < 0.001), stroke n = 1 (0.57%) in group1 and n = 4 in group 2 (14.8%) (P < 0.001), gastrointestinal bleeding n = 1 (0.57%) in group1 and no cases in group 2, renal insufficiency n = 2 (1.1%) in group 1 and n = 3 (11.1%) in group 2 (P = 0.01). One death was recorded in group 2 (3.7%). Conclusion: This series of 404 screws placed in 202 patients over 5 years who underwent two types of C1 fracture fixation had a considerably lower incidence of screw malposition and vertebral artery injury than has previously been reported in the literature. C1 screws can be safely placed with a low risk of vertebral artery and neurologic injury with and without CT-guided navigation support. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Pedicle screw instrumentation has become "state of the art" in surgical treatment of many spinal disorders. Loosening of pedicle screws due to poor bone mineral density is a frequent complication in osteoporotic patients. As prevalence of osteoporosis and spinal disorders are increasing with an aging demographic, optimizing the biomechanical properties of pedicle screw constructions and therefore outcome after spinal surgery in osteoporotic patients is a key factor in future surgical therapy. Therefore, this biomechanical study investigated the stability of polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA)‐augmented pedicle screw‐rod constructions under a deviating distribution of PMMA applied to the instrumentation in osteoporotic human cadaveric vertebrae. We showed that PMMA‐augmented pedicle screw‐rod constructions tend to be more stable than those with non‐augmented pedicle screws. Further, there appears to be a larger risk of screw loosening in unilateral augmented pedicle screws than in non‐augmented, therefore a highly asymmetrically distributed PMMA should be avoided. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Overview of the literature - Fractures of the C1 constitute 3%-13% of all cervical spine injuries in adults. Most isolated C1 fractures are stable and can be treated nonoperatively with external immobilization. Traditional surgical options for C1 fracture treatment are occiput-to-C2 fusion or C1 with lateral mass screws (LMSs). Purpose - The aim is to assess the management and perioperative complications of C1 fractures undergoing LMS fusion between fluoroscopy and computed tomography (CT)-guided navigation., Methods: This was a retrospective multicenter study of data from the DWG-Register of patients who underwent operative treatment for C1 traumatic fracture with LMSs from January 2017 to September 2022. Inclusion criteria - traumatic injury and age > 18 years old., Results: In total, 202 patients with traumatic C1 fracture requiring spinal surgery were identified in the registry; n = 175 (Group 1) were treated conventionally without CT-guided navigation and n = 27 were treated with CT-guided navigation (Group 2). C1-LMS was principally performed by spine surgeons n = 90 (53.4%) and n = 72 (18.5%) by neurosurgeons in both the groups. Intraoperative adverse events were as follows: dural tear in group 1 n = 0 and in group 2 n = 1, vascular injury, with one case in group 1 and no cases in group 2. General complications were: cardiovasculars in group 1 n = 6 (3.4%) and Group 2 n = 4 (14.8%) ( P = 0.03), pulmonary complications in group1 n = 2 (1.1%) and n = 9 in group 2 (33.3%) ( P < 0.001), stroke n = 1 (0.57%) in group1 and n = 4 in group 2 (14.8%) ( P < 0.001), gastrointestinal bleeding n = 1 (0.57%) in group1 and no cases in group 2, renal insufficiency n = 2 (1.1%) in group 1 and n = 3 (11.1%) in group 2 ( P = 0.01). One death was recorded in group 2 (3.7%)., Conclusion: This series of 404 screws placed in 202 patients over 5 years who underwent two types of C1 fracture fixation had a considerably lower incidence of screw malposition and vertebral artery injury than has previously been reported in the literature. C1 screws can be safely placed with a low risk of vertebral artery and neurologic injury with and without CT-guided navigation support., Competing Interests: All authors certify that they have no affiliations with or involvement in any organization or entity with any financial interest (such as honoraria; educational grants; participation in speakers’ bureaus; membership, employment, consultancies, stock ownership, or other equity interest; and expert testimony or patent-licensing arrangements) or nonfinancial interest (such as personal or professional relationships, affiliations, knowledge or beliefs) in the subject matter or materials discussed in this manuscript., (Copyright: © 2024 Journal of Craniovertebral Junction and Spine.)