Search

A novel enoxaparin regimen consisting of intra-arterial bolus (0.75 mg/kg) followed by intravenous infusion (0.75 mg/kg/6 hours) has been developed as a possible solution to the delayed absorption of oral P2Y12 inhibitors in opiate-treated ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients undergoing primary angioplasty. We aimed to study the feasibility of this regimen as an alternative to standard-of-care treatment (SOC) with unfractionated heparin ± glycoprotein IIb/IIIa antagonist (GPI). One hundred opiate-treated patients presenting with STEMI and accepted for primary angioplasty were randomized (1:1) to either enoxaparin or SOC. Fifty patients were allocated enoxaparin (median age 61, 40% females) and 49 allocated SOC (median age 62, 22% females). One developed stroke before angiography and was withdrawn. One SOC patient had a gastrointestinal bleed resulting in 1 g drop in hemoglobin and early cessation of GPI infusion. Two enoxaparin patients had transient minor bleeding: one transient gingival bleed and one episode of coffee ground vomit with no hemoglobin drop or hemodynamic instability. Two SOC and no enoxaparin group patients had acute stent thrombosis. These preliminary data support further study of this novel 6-hour enoxaparin regimen in opiate-treated PPCI patients.

Ticagrelor is an antagonist of both platelet adenosine diphosphate (ADP) receptor P2Y12 and equilibrative nucleoside transporter-1. Optimal timing of ticagrelor cessation prior to coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) remains unclear. We characterized the offset of ticagrelor's effects on platelets and cellular adenosine uptake in ticagrelor-treated patients (n = 13) awaiting CABG. Blood was drawn prior to CABG at multiple timepoints 2 to 120 (h) after the last dose of ticagrelor. Platelet function (n = 13) was assessed with multiple electrode aggregometry (MEA), expressed as arbitrary units (U) derived from area-under-the-curve (AUC) in response to ADP, and inhibition of adenosine uptake by high-performance liquid chromatography (n = 7). Mean±SD AUC was 20.3 ± 8.2 U (2 h post-ticagrelor), 33.0 ± 18.3U (24 h), 56.6 ± 30.6U (48 h), 61.4 ± 20.2U (72 h), 82.8 ± 24.2U (96 h) and 96.0 ± 15.3U (120 h). There was a significant difference between 72 h and 120 h (p = .007), but not between 96 h and 120 h (p > .99). By 96 h, all patients had AUC >31U, an accepted cutoff below which surgical bleeding risk is increased. Adenosine uptake showed no significant differences between the timepoints. These data suggest it takes 4 days for platelet reactivity to recover sufficiently after cessation of ticagrelor to avoid the excess risk of CABG-related bleeding. Discontinuing ticagrelor had no measurable effect on cellular adenosine uptake.

Higher aspirin doses may be inferior in ticagrelor-treated acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients and reducing bleeding risk whilst maintaining antithrombotic benefits could improve outcomes. We characterized the pharmacodynamics of a novel dual-antiplatelet-therapy regimen consisting of very-low-dose twice-daily (BD) aspirin with standard-dose ticagrelor. A total of 20 ticagrelor-treated ACS patients entered a randomized crossover to take aspirin 20 mg BD (12-hourly) during one 14-day period and 75 mg once-daily (OD) in the other. After 14 days of treatment, serum thromboxane (TX)B2 and light-transmittance aggregometry were assessed pre- and 2 h post-morning-dose, bleeding time was measured post-dose, and TXA2 and prostacyclin stable metabolites were measured in urine collected 2 h post-morning-dose. Data are expressed as mean ± SD. After 14 days treatment, serum TXB2 levels were significantly greater 2 h post-dosing with aspirin 20 mg BD vs. 75 mg OD (3.0 ± 3.6 ng/mL vs. 0.8 ± 1.9 ng/mL; p = 0.018) whereas pre-dosing levels were not significantly different (3.5 ± 4.1 ng/mL vs. 2.5 ± 3.1 ng/mL, p = 0.23). 1-mmol/L arachidonic acid-induced platelet aggregation was similarly inhibited by both regimens pre-dose (8.5 ± 14.3% vs. 5.1 ± 3.6%, p = 0.24) and post-dose (8.7 ± 14.2% vs. 6.6 ± 5.3%; p = 0.41). Post-dose bleeding time was shorter with 20 mg BD (680 ± 306 s vs. 834 ± 386 s, p = 0.02). Urinary prostacyclin and TX metabolite excretion were not significantly different. In conclusion, compared to aspirin 75 mg OD, aspirin 20 mg BD provided consistent inhibition of platelet TXA2 release and aggregation, and improved post-dose hemostasis, in ticagrelor-treated ACS patients. Further studies are warranted to assess whether this regimen improves the balance of clinical efficacy and safety.

There is evidence for the effects of platelet inhibition on innate immune activation. Circulating microRNAs (miRNAs) have been implicated as markers of platelet and leukocyte activation. In the present study, we assessed the effects of P2Y12 inhibitors on platelet and leukocyte miRNAs during endotoxemia. Healthy volunteers were randomly assigned to receive oral ticagrelor (n = 10), clopidogrel (n = 8) or no drug (n = 8) for one week, followed by an intravenous bolus of 2 ng/kg endotoxin. Serum was collected at baseline, after one week of antiplatelet treatment and 6 and 24 h after endotoxin administration. MiRNAs were screened using LNA-based qPCR, followed by TaqMan-qPCR validation of candidates. Clinical validation was performed in 41 sepsis patients. Platelet-enriched miR-197, miR-223 and miR-223* were decreased in volunteers following antiplatelet therapy. Endotoxin increased platelet miRNAs, whilst the opposite effect was seen for leukocyte-enriched miR-150. Neither of these endotoxin-mediated effects were altered by P2Y12 inhibitors. Sepsis patients with fatal outcomes (n = 12) had reduced miR-150 levels compared with survivors (n = 29). In conclusion, we show that miR-150 is downregulated in experimental endotoxemia and can predict survival in sepsis but is unaffected by P2Y12 inhibition. While P2Y12 inhibition reduces platelet-associated miRNAs in healthy volunteers, it fails to attenuate the response of platelet miRNAs to endotoxemia.

The increasing use of antiplatelet therapy, particularly aspirin and oral P2Y12 inhibitors, in the prevention and management of arterial thrombosis, has stimulated extensive pharmacodynamic studies and research into tailored antiplatelet regimens. Many different methodologies have been studied for monitoring antiplatelet drugs and some are now well validated and used in clinical practice. However, clinical studies of tailored antiplatelet therapy have not convincingly demonstrated a benefit of this approach in patients treated with aspirin and clopidogrel, coupled with the fact that more potent antiplatelet therapies have more consistent effects compared with clopidogrel and so may reduce the rationale for monitoring. On the other hand, the optimum timing of urgent surgery after cession of oral antiplatelet therapy may be informed by platelet function testing. This review discusses the different methodologies that have been used to monitor the effects of antiplatelet therapy and highlights the current position of platelet function testing in clinical practice.

SummaryDiabetes increases cardiovascular risk and reduces pharmacodynamic response to some oral antiplatelet drugs. This study aimed to determine whether ticagrelor 60 mg twice daily (bid) provided potent and consistent platelet inhibition in patients with vs without diabetes in the PEGASUS-TIMI 54 platelet function substudy. Out of 180 patients studied, 58 patients were randomised to and had received at least four weeks of ticagrelor 60 mg bid, with 20 (34 %) having diabetes, 58 patients received ticagrelor 90 mg bid, with 12 (21 %) having diabetes, and 64 patients received placebo, with 18 (28 %) having diabetes. Blood was sampled pre- and 2 hours post-maintenance dose. In patients treated with ticagrelor 60 mg bid, on-treatment platelet reactivity to ADP, as determined by light transmission aggregometry (LTA), VerifyNow and VASP, was similar in patients with vs without diabetes (LTA post-dose, ADP 20 ?M: 29 ± 14 vs 34 ± 10 %, respectively; p = 0.19). A consistent inhibitory effect of ticagrelor 60 mg bid was observed pre- and post-dose regardless of diabetes status, even in insulin-treated patients. Patients with diabetes did not have an increased incidence of high platelet reactivity in either ticagrelor group. Platelet reactivity was similar in patients with diabetes treated with ticagrelor 60 mg vs 90 mg bid. Pharmacokinetics of ticagrelor were not affected by diabetes status. In conclusion, ticagrelor 60 mg bid is equally effective at reducing platelet reactivity in patients with and without diabetes, yielding a consistently high level of platelet inhibition regardless of diabetes status.

Background The PEGASUS-TIMI 54 (Prevention of Cardiovascular Events in Patients with Prior Heart Attack Using Ticagrelor Compared to Placebo on a Background of Aspirin–Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction 54) trial studied 2 doses of ticagrelor, 90 mg twice a day (bid) and 60 mg bid, for long-term prevention of ischemic events in patients with prior myocardial infarction. Both doses similarly reduced the rate of ischemic events versus placebo. The pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of ticagrelor 60 mg bid have not been studied. Objectives In this study, the authors sought to study the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics for ticagrelor 60 mg compared with 90 mg bid. Methods A total of 180 patients who received >4 weeks of study medication had blood sampling in the morning pre-maintenance dose and again 2 h post-dose. All patients received aspirin. Plasma levels of ticagrelor and its active metabolite AR-C124910XX were determined. P2Y12 inhibition was assessed by the VerifyNow P2Y12 assay (Accumetrics, Inc., San Diego, California) (P2Y12 reaction units [PRU]), light transmittance aggregometry (adenosine diphosphate 5 and 20 μmol/l and arachidonic acid), and vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein phosphorylation assays. VerifyNow Aspirin assays and serum thromboxane B2 measurements were performed. Results Mean pre- and post-dose plasma levels of ticagrelor were 35% and 38% lower, respectively, with 60 mg versus 90 mg. Both doses achieved high levels of platelet inhibition pre- and post-dose, with numerically slightly more variability with 60 mg: mean (SD) pre-dose PRU values were 59 ± 63 and 47 ± 43 for ticagrelor 60 and 90 mg, respectively (p = 0.34). High platelet reactivity, determined as PRU >208, was rare with the 60-mg pre-dose and was absent post-dose. Platelet reactivity pre- and post-dose, as measured by light transmittance aggregometry or vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein assays, was numerically but not significantly lower with 90 mg than with 60 mg. Aspirin response was not affected by either dose. Conclusions Ticagrelor 60 mg bid achieved high levels of peak and trough platelet inhibition in nearly all patients, similar to that with 90 mg bid, helping to explain the efficacy of the lower ticagrelor dose in PEGASUS-TIMI 54.

Objective— Clinical studies suggest that platelet P2Y 12 inhibitors reduce mortality from sepsis, although the underlying mechanisms have not been clearly defined in vivo. We hypothesized that P2Y 12 inhibitors may improve survival from sepsis by suppressing systemic inflammation and its prothrombotic effects. We therefore determined whether clopidogrel and the novel, more potent P2Y 12 inhibitor, ticagrelor, modify these responses in an experimental human model. Approach and Results— We randomized 30 healthy volunteers to ticagrelor (n=10), clopidogrel (n=10), or no antiplatelet medication (controls; n=10). We examined the effect of P2Y 12 inhibition on systemic inflammation, which was induced by intravenous injection of Escherichia coli endotoxin. Both P2Y 12 inhibitors significantly reduced platelet–monocyte aggregate formation and peak levels of major proinflammatory cytokines, including tumor necrosis factor α, interleukin-6, and chemokine (C–C motif) ligand 2. In contrast to clopidogrel, ticagrelor also significantly reduced peak levels of IL-8 and growth colony-stimulating factor and increased peak levels of the anti-inflammatory cytokine IL-10. In addition, ticagrelor altered leukocyte trafficking. Both P2Y 12 inhibitors suppressed D-dimer generation and scanning electron microscopy revealed that ticagrelor also suppressed prothrombotic changes in fibrin clot ultrastructure. Conclusions— Potent inhibition of multiple inflammatory and prothrombotic mechanisms by P2Y 12 inhibitors demonstrates critical importance of platelets as central orchestrators of systemic inflammation induced by bacterial endotoxin. This provides novel mechanistic insight into the lower mortality associated with P2Y 12 inhibitors in patients with sepsis in clinical studies.

Background: Ticagrelor has superior efficacy to clopidogrel in the management of acute coronary syndromes but has not been assessed in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention for stable coronary artery disease. We compared the pharmacodynamic effects of ticagrelor and clopidogrel in this stable population. Methods: One hundred eighty aspirin-treated stable coronary artery disease patients, who were planned to undergo elective percutaneous coronary intervention in a single center, were randomized 1:1:1 to either a standard clopidogrel regimen or 1 of 2 regimens of ticagrelor, either 90 mg (T90) or 60 mg twice daily (T60), both with a 180 mg loading dose. Cellular adenosine uptake was assessed, at the time of the procedure and pre- and postdose at 1 month, by adding adenosine 1 µmol/L to aliquots of anticoagulated whole blood and mixing with a stop solution at 0, 15, 30, and 60 seconds, then measuring residual plasma adenosine concentration by high-performance liquid chromatography. Systemic plasma adenosine concentration and platelet reactivity were assessed at the same timepoints. High-sensitivity troponin T was measured pre- and 18 to 24 hours postpercutaneous coronary intervention. Results: One hundred seventy-four patients underwent an invasive procedure, of whom 162 received percutaneous coronary intervention (mean age 65 years, 18% female, 21% with diabetes mellitus). No effect on in vitro adenosine uptake was seen postdose at 1 month for either ticagrelor dose compared with clopidogrel (residual adenosine at 15 seconds, mean±SD: clopidogrel 0.274±0.101 µmol/L; T90 0.278±0.134 µmol/L; T60 0.288±0.149 µmol/L; P =0.37). Similarly, no effect of ticagrelor on in vitro adenosine uptake was seen at other timepoints, nor was plasma adenosine concentration affected (all P >0.1). Both maintenance doses of ticagrelor achieved more potent and consistent platelet inhibition than clopidogrel (VerifyNow P2Y 12 reaction units, 1 month, mean±SD: predose, T60: 62±47, T90: 40±38, clopidogrel 181±44; postdose, T60: 34±30, T90: 24±21, clopidogrel 159±57; all P 12 reaction units>208, 1 month postdose: 0%, 0%, and 21%, respectively). Median (interquartile range) high-sensitivity troponin T increased 16.9 (6.5–46.9) ng/L for clopidogrel, 22.4 (5.5–53.8) ng/L for T60, and 17.7 (8.1–43.5) ng/L for T90 ( P =0.95). There was a trend toward less dyspnea with T60 versus T90 (7.1% versus 19.0%; P =0.09). Conclusions: Maintenance therapy with T60 or T90 had no detectable effect on cellular adenosine uptake at 1 month, nor was there any effect on systemic plasma adenosine levels. Both regimens of ticagrelor achieved greater and more consistent platelet inhibition than clopidogrel but did not appear to affect troponin release after percutaneous coronary intervention. Clinical Trial Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT02327624.

In the PLATO study, ticagrelor was associated with fewer pulmonary infections and subsequent deaths than clopidogrel. Neutrophils are a first-line defence against bacterial lung infection; ticagrelor inhibits cellular uptake of adenosine, a known regulator of neutrophil chemotaxis and phagocytosis. We assessed whether the inhibition of adenosine uptake by ticagrelor influences neutrophil chemotaxis and phagocytosis. Neutrophils and erythrocytes were isolated from healthy volunteers. Concentration-dependent effects of adenosine on IL-8-induced neutrophil chemotaxis were investigated and the involved receptors identified using adenosine receptor antagonists. The modulatory effects of ticagrelor on adenosine-mediated changes in neutrophil chemotaxis and phagocytosis of Streptococcus pneumoniae were determined in the presence of erythrocytes to replicate physiological conditions of cellular adenosine uptake. Low-concentration adenosine (10− 8 M) significantly increased IL-8-induced neutrophil chemotaxis (% neutrophil chemotaxis: adenosine 28.7% ± 4.4 vs. control 22.6% ± 2.4; p, Graphical abstract

Aims Platelets have a fundamental role in atherothrombosis, but their role in early atherogenesis is unclear. The P2Y12 receptor is responsible for amplifying and sustaining platelet activation and P2Y12 inhibition is crucial in modulating the vessel wall response to injury. We therefore examined the role of platelet vs. vessel wall P2Y12 in early atherogenesis and considered the use of P2Y12 antagonists ticagrelor and clopidogrel in modulating this process. Methods and results ApoE−/− and ApoE−/−P2Y12−/− male mice underwent bone marrow transplantation and were fed a western diet for 4 weeks before assessing atherosclerotic burden. Compared with ApoE−/− controls, platelet P2Y12 deficiency profoundly reduced platelet reactivity but had no effect on atheroma formation, whereas vessel wall P2Y12 deficiency significantly attenuated atheroma in the aortic sinus and brachiocephalic artery (both P < 0.001). ApoE−/− and ApoE−/−P2Y12−/− male mice fed western diet plus either twice-daily doses of ticagrelor (100 mg/kg) or daily clopidogrel (20 mg/kg) for 4 weeks exhibited no significant reduction in atheroma compared with control mice fed mannitol. Attenuated P-selectin expression confirmed platelet P2Y12 inhibition in drug-treated mice. Conclusions Despite its major contribution to platelet reactivity, platelet P2Y12 has no effect on early atheroma formation, whereas vessel wall P2Y12 is important in this process. Ticagrelor and clopidogrel effectively reduced platelet reactivity but were unable to inhibit early atherogenesis, demonstrating that these P2Y12 inhibitors may not be effective in preventing early disease.

Dual antiplatelet therapy consisting of clopidogrel in addition to aspirin has previously been the standard of care for patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) but international guidelines have been evolving over the last 4 years with the introduction of prasugrel and ticagrelor. In October 2009, prasugrel was approved in the UK by the National Institute of Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) for use in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), diabetic patients with non-ST-elevation (NSTE) ACS undergoing PCI and patients with stent thrombosis while other ACS patients were to continue receiving clopidogrel. Ticagrelor was approved in October 2011 by NICE for use in patients with moderate-to-high risk NSTE ACS and STEMI undergoing primary PCI and was recommended in preference to clopidogrel in European guidelines. These recommendations were adopted in our region, constituting a population of 1.8 million. We studied the effect of changing patterns of P2Y12 inhibitor usage on levels of platelet inhibition during maintenance therapy. Patients admitted to Northern General Hospital, Sheffield, with NSTE ACS or STEMI managed with primary PCI were enrolled over two periods of time: May 2010 to November 2011 (T1); and October 2012 to February 2013 (T2). Venous blood samples were obtained at 1 month after the onset of ACS. Light transmittance aggregometry (LTA) was performed and maximum aggregation response to ADP 20 μM was determined. A total of 116 patients were enrolled in T1 of whom 82 were receiving clopidogrel and 34 were receiving prasugrel. Twenty-nine patients were enrolled in T2, all of whom were receiving ticagrelor. Mean LTA results according to treatment with clopidogrel, prasugrel and ticagrelor were 57 ± 18%, 41 ± 20%, and 31 ± 12%, respectively. Prasugrel was associated with significantly lower platelet aggregation responses than clopidogrel (p

SummaryVerifyNow (VN) P2Y12 is a point-of-care assay used to assess response to P2Y12 inhibitors. Sodium citrate (citrate) is the standard anticoagulant used for this assay but requires a pre-incubation period. Hirudin is an alternative anticoagulant for platelet function studies that maintains physiological divalent cation levels. We investigated whether hirudin anticoagulation might allow more rapid testing of P2Y12 inhibition at the time of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Blood was collected from the arterial sheath of aspirin-treated patients undergoing elective, urgent or emergency coronary angiography ± PCI and aliquots were anticoagulated with either citrate or hirudin. For each anticoagulant, VN P2Y12 was performed both immediately and after 20 minutes. A total of 98 patients were included in this study following pre-treatment with clopidogrel (n = 88), prasugrel (n = 6) or no P2Y12 inhibitor (n = 4). PRU with hirudin immediately (PRU_H_Imm) and PRU with citrate 20 minutes post sampling (PRU_C_20) were very strongly correlated (R = 0.95) though PRU_H_Imm tended to be lower than PRU_C_20 so that optimal correlation was estimated by the equation PRU_H_Imm = 0.95 x PRU_C_20 (p < 0.001). Bland-Altman plots showed good agreement between PRU_H_Imm and (0.95 x PRU_C_20). Platelet reactivity was more stable over the studied time course with hirudin as compared to citrate. We therefore conclude that VN P2Y12 with hirudin anticoagulation can be performed more rapidly and results are strongly correlated with delayed citrate measurements. Further studies are warranted to assess the utility of this method for improving clinical outcomes in patients undergoing PCI.

SummaryDelays in the onset of action of prasugrel during primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) have been reported and could be related to the effects of morphine on gastric emptying and subsequent intestinal absorption. The study objective was to determine whether morphine delays the onset of action of prasugrel in patients with a prior history of ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) treated with PPCI. This was a crossover study of 11 aspirin-treated patients with prior history of STEMI treated with PPCI, for which prasugrel and morphine had been previously administered. Patients were randomised to receive either morphine (5 mg) or saline intravenously followed by 60 mg prasugrel. Blood samples were collected before randomised treatment and over 24 hours after prasugrel administration. The inhibitory effects of prasugrel on platelets were determined using the VerifyNow P2Y12 assay and light transmission aggregometry. Plasma levels of prasugrel and prasugrel active metabolite were measured. Platelet reactivity determined by VerifyNow PRU, VerifyNow % Inhibition and LTA was significantly higher at 30–120 minutes (min) when morphine had been co-administered compared to when saline had been co-administered. Morphine, compared to saline, significantly delayed adequate platelet inhibition after prasugrel administration (158 vs 68 min; p = 0.006). Patients with delayed onset of platelet inhibition also had evidence of delayed absorption of prasugrel. In conclusion, prior administration of intravenous morphine significantly delays the onset of action of prasugrel. Intravenous drugs may be necessary to reduce the risk of acute stent thrombosis in morphine-treated STEMI patients undergoing PPCI.

Antiplatelet therapy plays a central role in the management of ischaemic heart disease [1]. While poor inhibition of P2Y12 receptor has been linked to higher incidence of ischaemic events, enhanced...

Objective— Our goal was to study the effects of ticagrelor on murine platelet function and thrombosis and characterize the time course of P2Y 12 inhibition required to inhibit neointima formation following vascular injury. Methods and Results— Mice were treated with ticagrelor or vehicle. Platelet aggregation and P-selectin expression were assessed over time, and thrombus formation was assessed in laser-injured cremasteric arterioles of P2Y 12 +/+ and P2Y 12 −/− mice. Neointima formation in FeCl 3 -injured carotid artery was assessed in C57BL/6 mice treated with different regimens of ticagrelor. Ticagrelor inhibited platelet aggregation and P-selectin expression in a dose-dependent, reversible manner. Ticagrelor inhibited thrombus formation to the same extent as seen in P2Y 12 −/− mice. Neointima formation was markedly reduced in mice treated with ticagrelor before and 4 hours after injury (neointima area: control, 39 921±22 749 μm 2 , versus ticagrelor, 3705±2600 μm 2 ; P Conclusion— Ticagrelor effectively and reversibly inhibits P2Y 12 -mediated platelet function and thrombosis in mice. P2Y 12 inhibition is required both at the time of and after injury to effectively inhibit neointima formation. Additional studies are warranted to evaluate the role of P2Y 12 inhibition in preventing restenosis.

The thienopyridine P2Y(12) receptor antagonist clopidogrel reduces the risk of arterial thrombosis and individual pharmacodynamic responses to clopidogrel are believed to reflect the levels of active metabolite (AM) generated. Rifampicin increases the inhibitory effect of clopidogrel on platelet aggregation (PA). We studied the response to clopidogrel before and during administration of rifampicin in order to study the relationship between individual AM levels and P2Y(12) blockade. Healthy volunteers received a 600-mg loading dose of clopidogrel followed by 75 mg daily for 7 days and, after a washout period and treatment with rifampicin [300 mg twice a day (b.i.d.)], received the same regimen of clopidogrel. Clopidogrel AM levels were determined over 4 h after the clopidogrel loading dose and unblocked P2Y(12) receptor number was assessed using a (33) P-2MeSADP binding assay. PA was measured by optical aggregometry with ADP and TRAP. Rifampicin enhanced clopidogrel AM production [area-under-the-curve (AUC): clopidogrel 89±22 ng h mL(-1) , clopidogrel+rifampicin 335±86 ng h mL(-1) , P0.0001], and P2Y(12) blockade (unblocked receptors: clopidogrel 48±24, clopidogrel+rifampicin 4±2, P0.0001) and reduced PA (5 μmol L(-1) ADP: clopidogrel 20±4, clopidogrel+rifampicin 5±2, P0.01). Increasing numbers of unblocked receptors were required for an aggregation response with a decreasing concentration of ADP. PA induced by ADP 2 μmol L(-1) was particularly sensitive to low levels of receptor blockade. Potentiation of clopidogrel AM production by rifampicin leads to greater P2Y(12) blockade and consequently greater inhibition of PA. PA responses to low concentrations of ADP are more sensitive to P2Y(12) blockade.

Background— Platelets are believed to play an important role in atherogenesis and the vessel response to vascular injury. The P2Y 12 receptor (P2Y 12 ) plays a central role in amplifying platelet aggregation, dense granule and α-granule secretion, P-selectin expression, microparticle formation, and procoagulant membrane changes, regardless of the activating stimulus. We hypothesized that P2Y 12 deficiency might reduce the vessel wall response to vascular injury as well as thrombosis in murine vascular injury models. Methods and Results— P2Y 12 -deficient (−/−) mice and littermate controls (+/+) were bred on a C57 BL/6 background. In vivo murine models of arterial injury were employed alone and in combination with bone marrow transplantation to investigate the role of P2Y 12 in the vessel wall response to arterial injury and thrombosis. At 21 days after ferric chloride injury, neointima formation in P2Y 12 −/− arteries was significantly less than that observed in control strain arteries ( P 12 +/+ compared with P2Y 12 −/− animals ( P 12 versus platelet P2Y 12 . Analysis of arterial sections from chimeric animals at 21 days after injury revealed a smaller intima-media ratio in −/− to +/+ animals than in the positive (+/+ to +/+) control group ( P Conclusions— These data demonstrate a role for platelet P2Y 12 in the vessel wall response to arterial injury and thrombosis. This illustrates the manner in which platelets may contribute to atherogenesis and restenosis.

The aim of these studies was to investigate the extent of platelet P2Y(12) receptor inhibition by the thienopyridine active metabolite of prasugrel, R-138727. Blood was taken from healthy volunteers and pre-incubated with R-138727 or cangrelor (AR-C66931MX). Platelet aggregation was assessed in platelet rich plasma (PRP) and whole blood (WB). Vasodilator stimulated phosphoprotein (VASP) phosphorylation, platelet procoagulant activity (annexin V binding and microparticle formation) and calcium mobilisation were measured by flow cytometry. Platelet-leukocyte co-aggregate formation and sCD40L release, both pro-inflammatory responses of platelets, were measured by flow cytometry and ELISA, respectively. P2Y(12) receptor antagonism was determined using a radioligand binding assay ((33)P 2-MeSADP) in resting and stimulated platelets and the effects of clopidogrel administration were also assessed. R-138727 yielded concentration-dependent inhibition of platelet aggregation, VASP phosphorylation inhibition, procoagulant activity and pro-inflammatory responses. In the presence of R-138727 or cangrelor there was increased calcium reuptake following agonist stimulation. R-138727 30 micromol/L and cangrelor 1 micromol/L completely inhibited (33)P 2-MeSADP binding, compared to partial inhibition following clopidogrel administration. Platelet activation and granule secretion did not expose an additional pool of P2Y(12) receptors. Prasugrel's active metabolite effectively blocks the P2Y(12) receptor with the highest concentrations tested yielding complete inhibition of P2Y(12)-mediated amplification of several important platelet responses.

Cangrelor is a rapid-acting, direct-binding, and reversible P2Y12 antagonist which has been studied for use during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with or without pretreatment with an oral P2Y12 antagonist. As cangrelor is administered intravenously, it is necessary to switch to an oral P2Y12 antagonist following PCI, such as the thienopyridines clopidogrel, and prasugrel or the non-pyridine ticagrelor. Previous studies have suggested a negative pharmacodynamic interaction between cangrelor and thienopyridines. This in vitro study evaluated the receptor-level interaction between cangrelor and the active metabolite (AM) of clopidogrel or prasugrel by assessing functional P2Y12 receptor number using a (33)P-2MeSADP binding assay. All P2Y12 antagonists studied resulted in strong P2Y12 receptor blockade (cangrelor: 93.6%; clopidogrel AM: 93.0%; prasugrel AM: 97.9%). Adding a thienopyridine AM in the presence of cangrelor strongly reduces P2Y12 receptor blockade by the AM (clopidogrel AM: 7%, prasugrel AM: 3.2%). The thienopyridine AMs had limited ability to compete with cangrelor for binding to P2Y12 (% P2Y12 receptor blockade after co-incubation with cangrelor 1000 nmol/L: 11.7% for clopidogrel AM 3 µmol/L; 34.1% for prasugrel AM 3 µmol/L). In conclusion, in vitro cangrelor strongly inhibits the binding of clopidogrel and prasugrel AMs to the P2Y12 receptor, consistent with the previous observation of a negative pharmacodynamic interaction. Care may need to be taken to not overlap exposure to thienopyridine AMs and cangrelor in order to reduce the risk of thrombotic complications following PCI.

SummaryThis study aimed to establish the utility of a whole-blood singleplatelet counting (WBSPC) assay, a measure of microaggregation, in monitoring the effects of tirofiban, comparing this with optical aggregometry (OA) and the Ultegra TRAP cartridge system (UTC), measures of macroaggregation. Fifty-nine patients with acute coronary syndrome scheduled for coronary angiography +/angioplasty were studied. WBSPC assay (ADP 0.3-100 µM, Sysmex KX21 analyzer), OA (ADP 20 µM) and UTC were performed: before starting tirofiban; 30 min, 4 and 24 h after starting tirofiban; and 1 and 2h after stopping tirofiban. Thirty minutes after starting tirofiban, there was substantial inhibition of platelet aggregation (40 ± 30%; WBSPC, 2 minutes after addition of ADP 30 µM) and this remained stable at 4 and 24 h. OA (86 ± 17%; inhibition of maximal aggregation,ADP 20 µM) and UTC (93 ± 7%) showed marked inhibition with less inter-individual variation. There was no significant correlation between OA and UTC results (R2 = 0.006), but fair correlation between OA and WBSPC results (R2 = 0.37). Greater inhibition of macroaggregation (OA and UTC) was seen compared to microaggregation (WBSPC) such that WBSPC was more discriminating in the therapeutic range when macroaggregation was often completely inhibited. A WBSPC assay of platelet microaggregation shows promise for monitoring GPIIb/IIIa antagonists.

Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa (GPIIb/IIIa) antagonists, including abciximab and tirofiban, are administered concurrently with clopidogrel, a P2Y12 antagonist, and aspirin in some patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. We studied the effects of, and interactions between, abciximab, tirofiban, aspirin and the P2Y12 antagonist cangrelor on platelet aggregation, alpha and dense granule secretion and procoagulant responses in vitro. Blood was obtained from healthy volunteers. Platelet aggregation, dense granule secretion, alpha granule secretion (PAI-1 and soluble CD40 ligand levels) and procoagulant responses (annexin-V and microparticle formation) were assessed using collagen and thrombin receptor activating peptide (TRAP) as agonists. All the antagonists used singularly inhibited collagen-induced responses. Combinations of abciximab or tirofiban with aspirin and/or cangrelor gave additive inhibition with the greatest effect seen when abciximab or tirofiban was combined with both aspirin and cangrelor. Cangrelor inhibited TRAP-induced responses and, again, there was additive inhibition of these parameters when abciximab or tirofiban were combined with cangrelor. The GPIIb/IIIa receptor plays an important role in amplification of platelet activation such that there are important interactions between GPIIb/IIIa antagonists and inhibitors of both P2Y12 receptor activation and, to a lesser extent, thromboxane A2 generation. These interactions are likely to have important influences on the safety and efficacy of combination anti-platelet therapies.

Genetic variations of the protease-activated receptor-1 (PAR-1) have been associated with platelet receptor density and linked to thrombin receptor-activating peptide (TRAP)-induced phenotypes of platelet aggregation and P-selectin expression. We investigated whether the PAR-1 intervening sequence-14 AT dimorphism influences platelet procoagulant activity. We also determined whether the P2Y12 antagonist clopidogrel could offset any observed functional polymorphism of the PAR-1 receptor by inhibiting P2Y12-mediated amplification of TRAP-induced responses. We studied 54 patients listed for elective percutaneous coronary intervention assessing TRAP-induced platelet aggregation and markers of procoagulant activity. Platelet responses were measured at baseline, 4 h post clopidogrel 300 mg, and 10 and 28 days following clopidogrel 75 mg daily. Each patient was genotyped for the PAR-1 intervening sequence-14 A/T dimorphism. Increased platelet aggregation and procoagulant responses were observed with PAR-1 A allele homozygotes. Clopidogrel significantly inhibited these platelet responses regardless of PAR-1 genotype, but did not offset the hyper-reactivity associated with the A/A homozygotes. We conclude that a common sequence variation within the PAR-1 gene influences TRAP-induced platelet procoagulant activity as well as aggregation. Higher platelet reactivity associated with PAR-1 IVSn-14 A allele homozygotes persists despite clopidogrel therapy. These individuals may be at higher risk of thromboembolic events and may require additional anti-platelet medication.

SummaryInappropriate platelet activation is a feature of acute and chronic diseases such as disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) and atherosclerosis. Since proinflammatory microbial-derived agonists can be involved in the pathogenesis of these diseases, we examined the potential role ofTLR4 (mediating responses to LPS) andTLR2 (which responds to bacterial lipopeptides) in platelet activation. Our data suggested low-level expression of TLR2 andTLR4 on platelets, determined by flow cytometry, and we also observed expression of TLR4 on a megakaryocytic cell line by both flow cytometry and immunohistochemistry. Stimulation of the platelets with the TLR4 agonist LPS, and the synthetic TLR2 agonist Pam3CSK4, resulted in no platelet aggregation, no increase in CD62P surface expression and no increase in the cytosolic concentration of Ca2+. The TLR agonists were also unable to directly activate platelets primed with epinephrine, or pretreated with a low concentration ofADP or PAF. Pretreatment of platelets with LPS or Pam3CSK4 also failed to modulate the platelet response to submaximal concentrations of the classical platelet agonists ADP and PAF. We conclude that theTLR agonists LPS and Pam3CSK4 have no direct effect on platelet activation and that platelet TLRs may be a remnant from megakaryocytes. TLR2 and TLR4 agonists are thought to have a significant role in diseases such as atherosclerosis and DIC, but our research suggests that this is through a mechanism other than direct platelet activation or by modification of platelet responses to other agonists.

We investigated whether statin type or dose influenced the inhibition of platelet function induced by clopidogrel in a prospective, open, parallel group study in patients undergoing elective percutaneous coronary intervention. Patients were taking CYP3A4 metabolised atorvastatin (n = 20) or simvastatin (n = 21), non-CYP3A4 metabolised pravastatin (n = 11) or fluvastatin (n = 2), or no statin therapy (n = 5). ADP and TRAP-induced platelet aggregation were measured using optical aggregometry, whole-blood single-platelet counting, and the Ultegra and Plateletworks point-of-care systems. Platelet pro-coagulant activity (annexin V binding and microparticle formation), P-selectin expression and platelet-leukocyte conjugate formation were assessed by flow cytometry. Platelet responses were measured at baseline, 4 h post clopidogrel 300 mg, and after 10 and 28 days with clopidogrel 75 mg daily. Clopidogrel significantly inhibited both ADP and TRAP-induced platelet responses over time, with steady state inhibition achieved by day 10. This was demonstrated by all techniques used. There was no significant effect of statin type or dose on platelet responses by any method at any time-point. In conclusion, statins do not influence the inhibitory effects of clopidogrel on multiple platelet responses, including aggregation, P-selectin expression, platelet-leucocyte conjugate formation and pro-coagulant responses, in patients undergoing elective PCI.

The effects of the GPIIb-IIIa antagonists abciximab and MK-852 on platelet-leukocyte interactions in vitro were studied and the results compared with those obtained with a combination of aspirin, dipyridamole and AR-C69931 (Asp/Dip/AR-C). Platelet-monocyte (P/M) and platelet-neutrophil (P/N) conjugate formation increased when blood was stirred or a platelet agonist was added. Leukocyte activation also occurred as judged by expression of surface tissue factor antigen and CD11b. Abciximab and MK-852 potentiated P/M, especially when collagen was used. They also increased the amount of tissue factor on the monocytes, but not CD11b. The Asp/Dip/AR-C did not enhance P/M or tissue factor exposure. Augmented tissue factor expression on monocytes in the presence of a GPIIb-IIIa antagonist may be relevant to the increased mortality associated with trials of such antagonists when given orally in patients with vascular disease. The Asp/Dip/AR-C was superior to abciximab and MK-852 in inhibiting platelet and leukocyte function.

Introduction Ticagrelor is a more potent platelet inhibitor than clopidogrel but also has a more rapid offset of inhibitory effect. The optimal timing of discontinuation of ticagrelor prior to coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery is unknown. In the ONSET/OFFSET study of patients with stable coronary artery disease, ticagrelor’s effects dissipated within 48–120 hours of discontinuation. However, there is evidence that the pharmacodynamics of antiplatelet therapy are significantly altered during an acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and the ONSET/OFFSET study results should not be extrapolated to ACS patients. Although the PLATO study suggested that it was safe to discontinue ticagrelor 48 hours prior to CABG, regulatory authorities recommended that ticagrelor should be discontinued 5 days prior to CABG. The PLATO study also showed that ticagrelor was associated with fewer deaths following pulmonary adverse events and sepsis compared to clopidogrel. It is unknown whether ticagrelor’s additional property of inhibiting cellular adenosine uptake might underlie this observation. The aim of this study was to characterise the offset of ticagrelor’s activity in inhibiting platelets and also in inhibiting cellular adenosine uptake in ACS patients. Methods Patients admitted with ACS, treated with ticagrelor and referred for CABG were recruited. Venous blood was drawn from patients at the following 6 timepoints: 2 hours (h), 24 hour, 48 hour, 72 hour, 96 hour, and 120 hour after the last dose of ticagrelor prior to CABG. Whole-blood aggregometry was carried out using the Multiplate analyzer with adenosine diphosphate 6.45 µM as agonist and the final value of area under the curve (AUC) (units, U) was recorded. Results were analysed using linear mixed models. A local protocol was referred to, where an AUC of >50U supports safe progression to surgery, while values 50U indicates need for re-testing 24–48 hours later. Inhibition of adenosine uptake was determined by measuring the adenosine plasma concentration using liquid chromatography. Results 13 patients were recruited, all of whom received ticagrelor prior to CABG surgery. At 96 hour post ticagrelor, the mean AUC was 82.8U, (95% confidence interval, 60.4, 105.2). Only at 96 hour was the lower limit of the confidence interval >50U. From the mixed model analysis, the comparison between 72 hour and 120 hour post ticagrelor showed a significant difference (p=0.007) while 96 hour and 120 hour showed no significant difference (p=1.000). Adenosine plasma concentration was measured in 7 patients who received ticagrelor and showed no significant difference in adenosine plasma concentration across all timepoints. Conclusion ACS patients might be safe to undergo CABG surgery 4 days after the cessation of ticagrelor. Ticagrelor might have no measurable effect on adenosine transport in ACS patients.

SummaryVorapaxar is an antagonist of the protease activated receptor-1 (PAR-1), the principal platelet thrombin receptor. The Thrombin Receptor Antagonist for Clinical Event Reduction (TRACER) trial evaluated vorapaxar compared to placebo in non-ST-elevation (NSTE)-acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients. It was the study′s objective to assess the pharmacodynamic effects of vorapaxar versus placebo that included aspirin or a thienopyridine or, frequently, a combination of both agents in NSTE-ACS patients. In a substudy involving 249 patients, platelet aggregation was assessed by light transmittance aggregometry (LTA) in 85 subjects (41 placebo, 44 vorapaxar) using the agonists thrombin receptor activating peptide (TRAP, 15 μM), adenosine diphosphate (ADP, 20 μM), and the combination of collagen-related peptide (2.5 μg/ml) + ADP (5 μM) + TRAP (15 μM) (CAT). VerifyNow® IIb/IIIa and vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein (VASP) phosphorylation assays were performed, and platelet PAR-1 expression, plasma platelet/endothelial and inflammatory biomarkers were determined before and during treatment. LTA responses to TRAP and CAT and VerifyNow results were markedly inhibited by vorapaxar. Maximal LTA response to TRAP (median, interquartile range) 2 hours post loading dose: placebo 68% (53–75%) and vorapaxar 3% (2–6%), p

VerifyNow (VN) P2Y12 is a point-of-care assay used to assess response to P2Y12 inhibitors. Sodium citrate (citrate) is the standard anticoagulant used for this assay but requires a pre-incubation period. Hirudin is an alternative anticoagulant for platelet function studies that maintains physiological divalent cation levels. We investigated whether hirudin anticoagulation might allow more rapid testing of P2Y₁₂ inhibition at the time of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Blood was collected from the arterial sheath of aspirin-treated patients undergoing elective, urgent or emergency coronary angiography±PCI and aliquots were anticoagulated with either citrate or hirudin. For each anticoagulant, VN P2Y12 was performed both immediately and after 20 minutes. A total of 98 patients were included in this study following pre-treatment with clopidogrel (n=88), prasugrel (n=6) or no P2Y₁₂ inhibitor (n=4). PRU with hirudin immediately (PRU_H_Imm) and PRU with citrate 20 minutes post sampling (PRU_C_20) were very strongly correlated (R=0.95) though PRU_H_Imm tended to be lower than PRU_C_20 so that optimal correlation was estimated by the equation PRU_H_Imm=0.95xPRU_C_20 (p0.001). Bland-Altman plots showed good agreement between PRU_H_Imm and (0.95xPRU_C_20). Platelet reactivity was more stable over the studied time course with hirudin as compared to citrate. We therefore conclude that VN P2Y12 with hirudin anticoagulation can be performed more rapidly and results are strongly correlated with delayed citrate measurements. Further studies are warranted to assess the utility of this method for improving clinical outcomes in patients undergoing PCI.

SummaryThe thienopyridine P2Y12 receptor antagonists clopidogrel and prasugrel prevent arterial thrombosis and are routinely used following percutaneous coronary intervention. However, the optimal level of P2Y12 blockade to effectively inhibit platelet function is unknown. These studies utilised the active metabolite of prasugrel (R-138727) to achieve a range of P2Y12 blockade in vitro and assessed several aspects of platelet function. Blood from healthy volunteers was incubated with R-138727 (0–10 μM). P2Y12 receptor number was assessed using a 33P-2MeSADP binding assay. Platelet aggregation (PA) was measured by optical aggregometry with ADP 2–20 μM. VASP phosphorylation, annexin V binding, microparticle formation and P-selectin expression were assessed by flow cytometry. Increasing numbers of unblocked receptors were required for a sustained aggregation response with decreasing concentrations of ADP. A P2Y12 receptor blockade of 60–80% resulted in strong inhibition of final PA response, P-selectin expression, microparticle formation and vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein (VASP). PA induced by ADP 2 μM and P-selectin expression were particularly sensitive to low levels of receptor blockade whereas the VASP phosphorylation assay was relatively insensitive, requiring 60% receptor blockade to achieve substantial inhibition. Different assays varied in their ability to discriminate particular ranges of P2Y12 blockade and 80% or greater P2Y12 receptor blockade is required for consistently strong inhibition of several aspects of platelet function. These data guide the interpretation of results from different assays used to monitor the effects of P2Y12 receptor antagonists.

The efficacy of the platelet P2Y12 receptor antagonist clopidogrel, which undergoes cytochrome-mediated metabolism to its active form, shows marked inter-individual variability. We investigated whether polymorphic variations in the P2Y12 gene, which have been linked to platelet aggregation phenotypes, or the cytochrome P450 3A5 gene 6986G > A polymorphism, which largely determines CYP3A5 expression, influence the response to clopidogrel therapy. Fifty-four patients listed for elective percutaneous coronary intervention were studied using ADP-induced optical aggregometry, whole-blood single platelet counting (WBSPC) aggregometry, and flow-cytometric analysis of platelet P-selectin expression and platelet-monocyte conjugate formation. Platelet reactivity was measured at baseline, 4 h post clopidogrel 300 mg, and 10 and 28 days following clopidogrel 75 mg daily. A further 55 patients were studied using ADP-induced WBSPC at baseline and 4 h post clopidogrel 600 mg. Patients were genotyped for P2Y12 haplotype and the CYP3A5 6986G > A single nucleotide polymorphism. Neither genotype was found to significantly influence the inhibition of platelet responses by either clopidogrel regimen. In conclusion, common sequence variations within the P2Y12 and CYP3A5 genes do not contribute any major effect to the inter-patient variability in clopidogrel efficacy.

Inappropriate platelet activation is a feature of acute and chronic diseases such as disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) and atherosclerosis. Since proinflammatory microbial-derived agonists can be involved in the pathogenesis of these diseases, we examined the potential role of TLR4 (mediating responses to LPS) and TLR2 (which responds to bacterial lipopeptides) in platelet activation. Our data suggested low-level expression of TLR2 and TLR4 on platelets, determined by flow cytometry, and we also observed expression of TLR4 on a megakaryocytic cell line by both flow cytometry and immunohistochemistry. Stimulation of the platelets with the TLR4 agonist LPS, and the synthetic TLR2 agonist Pam3CSK4, resulted in no platelet aggregation, no increase in CD62P surface expression and no increase in the cytosolic concentration of Ca2+. The TLR agonists were also unable to directly activate platelets primed with epinephrine, or pretreated with a low concentration of ADP or PAF. Pretreatment of platelets with LPS or Pam3CSK4 also failed to modulate the platelet response to submaximal concentrations of the classical platelet agonists ADP and PAF. We conclude that the TLR agonists LPS and Pam3CSK4 have no direct effect on platelet activation and that platelet TLRs may be a remnant from megakaryocytes. TLR2 and TLR4 agonists are thought to have a significant role in diseases such as atherosclerosis and DIC, but our research suggests that this is through a mechanism other than direct platelet activation or by modification of platelet responses to other agonists.

Platelet-leukocyte interactions are recognised to have pro-inflammatory effects, which may be important in the pathophysiology of ischaemic heart disease. Clopidogrel and the novel intravenous antithrombotic agent AR-C69931MX act at the level of the platelet P2Y12 receptor, which is known to amplify platelet activation, aggregation and other responses induced by numerous platelet agonists. We studied the effects of clopidogrel and aspirin on ADP-induced platelet-leukocyte conjugate formation and P-selectin expression in healthy volunteers. The effects of clopidogrel and AR-C69931MX administered to patients with ischaemic heart disease were also assessed. AR-C69931MX and aspirin were also studied in vitro. Clopidogrel and AR-C69931MX suppressed ADP-induced platelet aggregation, P-selectin expression and platelet-leukocyte conjugate formation whereas aspirin had no inhibitory effect. These effects of clopidogrel and AR-C69931MX may confer therapeutic benefits in the management of acute coronary syndromes.

Introduction In the PLATelet inhibition and patient Outcomes (PLATO) study, ticagrelor was associated with fewer pulmonary infection events and subsequent deaths but slightly higher inflammatory markers compared to clopidogrel. Ticagrelor and clopidogrel inhibit platelet P2Y12 receptors via different mechanisms and ticagrelor additionally is a weak inhibitor of reuptake of adenosine, which has numerous effects on innate immunity. We studied the effects of ticagrelor and clopidogrel on the innate immune responses of healthy volunteers. Methods 30 healthy volunteers were randomised to receive ticagrelor 90 mg bd (n = 10), clopidogrel 75 mg od (n = 10) or no antiplatelet medication (controls; n = 10) for one week. E. coli endotoxin (LPS, 2 ng/kg) was then administered intravenously. Blood was sampled pre-treatment, after treatment and over 24 h post LPS. Platelet aggregation induced by 30 µM ADP was assessed by optical aggregometry. Platelet P-selectin expression and platelet-leukocyte conjugate formation were determined by flow cytometry. Plasma levels of cytokines were determined using cytometric bead array. Results After treatment, maximal platelet aggregation responses to ADP in the ticagrelor, clopidogrel and control groups were 12 ± 6%, 31 ± 26% and 81 ± 24% respectively. After LPS exposure, ticagrelor and clopidogrel significantly reduced ADP-induced platelet P-selectin expression and platelet-monocyte conjugate formation compared to controls. LPS-induced increases in TNF were significantly attenuated by both ticagrelor (p = 0.025) and clopidogrel (p = 0.017), which reduced peak levels by 61% and 60% respectively compared to controls. Peak TNF levels correlated with indices of platelet reactivity (ADP-induced platelet aggregation [p = 0.0096], P-selectin expression [p = 0.026] and platelet-monocyte conjugate formation [p = 0.024]). Ticagrelor also significantly attenuated IL-6 release (p = 0.015), reducing peak levels by 43% compared to controls, whereas clopidogrel had a non-significant effect (p = 0.15), with peak levels 28% lower than controls. Conclusion Ticagrelor inhibited release of pro-inflammatory cytokines TNF and IL-6 in a model of human sepsis. The similar effect of ticagrelor and clopidogrel, as well as the correlation between levels of platelet reactivity and TNF release, suggest that P2Y12 contributes to innate immune response and demonstrates anti-inflammatory effects of P2Y12 inhibition.