Search

BACKGROUND AND AIMS India has a significant burden of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection and has committed to achieving national elimination by 2030. This will require a substantial scale-up in testing and treatment. The "HEAD-Start Project Delhi" aimed to enhance HCV diagnosis and treatment pathways among the general population. METHODS A prospective study was conducted at 5 district hospitals (Arm 1: one-stop shop), 15 polyclinics (Arm 2: referral for viral load (VL) testing and treatment) and 62 screening camps (Arm 3: referral for treatment). HCV prevalence, retention in the HCV care cascade, and turn-around time were measured. RESULTS Between January and September 2019, 37 425 participants were screened for HCV. The median (IQR) age of participants was 35 (26-48) years, with 50.4% male and 49.6% female. A significantly higher proportion of participants in Arm 1 (93.7%) and Arm 3 (90.3%) received a VL test compared with Arm 2 (52.5%, P

Background: People who use drugs (PWUD) are among those with the highest risk for hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. Highly effective direct-acting antiviral agents offer an opportunity to eliminate HCV. A simple tool for the prediction of HCV infection risk in PWUD is urgently needed. This study aimed to develop and validate a risk prediction tool to identify people at greater risk of having hepatitis C among PWUD that is applicable in resource-limited settings. Methods: We extracted data from national HIV/AIDS sentinel surveillance in PWUD (Zhejiang Province, 2016–2021) and developed and validated a risk score to improve HCV testing in PWUD. This risk score consists of seven risk factors identified using multivariable logistic regression modeling (2016–2020, exploratory group). We validated this score using surveillance data for 2021 (validation group). The accuracy of the model was determined using C-statistics. Results: We identified seven risk factors, including sex, age, marital status, educational attainment, and the use of heroin, morphine, and methamphetamine. In the exploratory group, the positive rates of detecting the HCV antibody in the low-risk (0–9 points), intermediate-risk (10–16 points), and high-risk (≥17 points) groups were 6.72%, 17.24%, and 38.02%, respectively (Ptrend < 0.001). In the validation group, the positive rates in the low-, medium-, and high-risk groups were 4.46%, 12.23%, and 38.99%, respectively (Ptrend < 0.001). Conclusions: We developed and validated a drug-specific risk prediction tool for identifying PWUD at increased risk of HCV infection. This tool can complement and integrate the screening strategy for the purpose of early diagnosis and treatment.

Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) is a major health care concern worldwide. Egypt shows the highest worldwide HCV prevalence. Fibrosis progression is common in HCV and it is the most important prognostic factor in chronic HCV patients. The aim of this study was to investigate changes in some parameters of liver fibrosis progression after successful HCV eradication by direct acting antiviral (DAA) therapy in Egyptian patients. The study included 100 chronic HCV patients. liver stiffness measurement (LSM) was obtained by Transient elastography (TE) or Fibroscan before starting DAA treatment, after the end of 12 weeks of treatment and after achieving sustained virologic response12 (SVR12). Based on baseline LSM, patients were stratified into F2, F3 and F4 groups (METAVIR), F0-F1 patients were excluded. LSM and laboratory data after the end of treatment and after achieving SVR12 was compared with that baseline values in each fibrosis group. Following DAA treatment, all patients achieved SVR12. Mean baseline LSM dropped from 13.5 to 10.1 (kPa) post SVR12; the maximum change occurred in F2 patients 84.3% versus 84.2%, 43.3% in F3, and F4 patients respectively (p < 0.001). At baseline, 30 patients were in the F4 group; only 11 patients (43.3%) regressed to non-cirrhotic range (

Objectives Hepatitis B and D infections are highly endemic in Mauritania, with prevalences ranging from 10 to 20%. With the present prospective transversal pilot study, we aimed to evaluate the prevalences of HBV, HCV, and HDV infections in healthcare workers (HCWs), and offer treatment or vaccination as required. Methods At inclusion, each HCW was screened for anti-HBc Ab (followed by HBsAg assay when positive). Additional biological analyses were performed for HBsAg + cases. Depending on the results, HBV vaccination or anti-viral treatment was offered. Results A total of 3,857 HCWs were included, of whom 1,363 tested negative for anti-HBc Ab and received full vaccination. Of the 2,494 HCWs who were positive for anti-HBc Ab, 1,246 were positive for anti-HBs Ab and 418 were positive for HBsAg. Three HCWs were positive for HBeAg; 66 and 18 had HBV DNA levels respectively > 2,000 and > 20,000 IU/mL; and 48 were positive for anti-HDV Ab among whom 10 were positive for HDV RNA. HCV prevalence was 0.5%. Only seven HCWs fulfilled the criteria for treatment and five of them were treated. Conclusion Few HCWs in Mauritania are immunised against HBV. The prevalences of anti-HBc Ab and HBsAg observed in this work were similar to those observed in our earlier works, whereas prevalence of active HDV infection was less high. HBV and HDV infections are a serious health concern in Mauritania. New recommendations developed in accordance with WHO guidelines should include mandatory HBV screening and immunisation for HCWs.

Background Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), hepatitis C virus (HCV) and hepatitis B virus (HBV) are substantial public health threats in the region of Central Asia and the Caucasus, where the prevalence of these infections is currently rising. Methods A systematic review of MEDLINE, Embase and PsycINFO was conducted with no publication date or language restrictions through October 2019. Additional data were also harvested from national surveillance reports, references found in discovered sources, and other “grey” literature. It included studies conducted on high-risk populations (people who inject drugs (PWID), female sex workers (FSW), men who have sex with men (MSM), prisoners, and migrants) in Central Asia: Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, and Uzbekistan; and the Caucasus: Armenia, Azerbaijan, Georgia, and Northern Caucasus region of the Russian Federation. Results Wide ranges were noted for HIV prevalence: PWID 0–30.1%, MSM 0–25.1%, prisoners 0–22.8%, FSW 0–10.0%, and migrants 0.06–1.5%, with the highest prevalence of these high-risk groups reported in Kazakhstan (for PWID), Georgia (for MSM and prisoners) and Uzbekistan (for migrants). HCV prevalence also had a wide range: PWID 0.3–92.1%, MSM 0–18.9%, prisoners 23.8–49.7%, FSW 3.3–17.8%, and migrants 0.5–26.5%, with the highest prevalence reported in Georgia (92.1%), Kyrgyzstan (49.7%), and migrants from Tajikistan and Uzbekistan (26.5%). Similarly, HBV prevalence had a wide range: PWID 2.8–79.7%, MSM 0–22.2%, prisoners 2.7–6.2%, FSW 18.4% (one study), and migrants 0.3–15.7%. Conclusion In Central Asia and the Caucasus, prevalence of HIV, HCV and HBV remains exceedingly high among selected populations, notably PWID and MSM.

Background & aims Elimination of HCV by 2030, as defined by the World Health Organization (WHO), is attainable with the availability of highly efficacious therapies. This study reports progress made in the timing of HCV elimination in 45 high-income countries between 2017 and 2019. Methods Disease progression models of HCV infection for each country were updated with latest data on chronic HCV prevalence, and annual diagnosis and treatment levels, assumed to remain constant in the future. Modelled outcomes were analysed to determine the year in which each country would meet the WHO 2030 elimination targets. Results Of the 45 countries studied, 11 (Australia, Canada, France, Germany, Iceland, Italy, Japan, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, and United Kingdom) are on track to meet WHO's elimination targets by 2030; five (Austria, Malta, Netherlands, New Zealand, and South Korea) by 2040; and two (Saudi Arabia and Taiwan) by 2050. The remaining 27 countries are not expected to achieve elimination before 2050. Compared to progress in 2017, South Korea is no longer on track to eliminate HCV by 2030, three (Canada, Germany, and Sweden) are now on track, and most countries (30) saw no change. Conclusions Assuming high-income countries will maintain current levels of diagnosis and treatment, only 24% are on track to eliminate HCV by 2030, and 60% are off track by at least 20 years. If current levels of diagnosis and treatment continue falling, achieving WHO's 2030 targets will be more challenging. With less than ten years remaining, screening and treatment expansion is crucial to meet WHO's HCV elimination targets.

Background Egypt is the nation most affected by hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection, following an epidemic of historic proportions. We aimed to characterize the epidemic’s historical evolution and to delineate the role of parenteral antischistosomal therapy (PAT) campaigns in transmission. Methods A mathematical model was constructed and analysed in order to understand HCV-transmission dynamics. The model was fitted to Egypt’s Demographic and Health Survey data and to a systematic database of HCV-prevalence data. Results The incidence rate peaked in 1966 at 15.7 infections per 1000 person-years—a period of time that coincides with the PAT campaigns—and rapidly declined thereafter, beginning the mid-1990s. The annual number of new infections peaked in 1993 at 581 200 (with rapid demographic growth), leading to a high-incidence-cohort effect, and declined to 67 800 by 2018. The number of individuals ever infected (1950–2018) was 16.4 million, with HCV prevalence peaking in 1979. The number of individuals ever exposed to PAT was 8.3 million; however, of these individuals, 7.3 million were alive in 1980 and only 3.5 million alive in 2018. The number of individuals ever infected due to PAT exposure was 963 900, with 850 200 individuals alive in 1980 and only 389 800 alive in 2018. The proportion of PAT-attributed prevalent infections peaked at 19.9% in 1972, declining to 5.5% by 2018. Conclusions PAT campaigns played an important role in HCV transmission, yet explain only 6% of infections—they appear to be a manifestation, rather than a cause, of the epidemic. A possible driver of the epidemic could be the mass expansion of inadequate-quality healthcare during PAT campaigns and subsequent decades. Despite a historic toll, the epidemic has been rapidly diminishing since the mid-1990s.

Background and Objectives: Co-infection of hepatitis C virus (HCV) with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) is in- creasing due to similar transmission pathways. Chronic HCV infection is the most common complication among HIV-infect- ed individuals. Information on the frequency of HCV infection on Iranian HIV-infected individuals is scarce. The aim of this study was the detection of HCV prevalence and genotypes among HIV-infected people in Sanandaj, Iran. Materials and Methods: In this cross-sectional study, whole blood samples were taken from 185 HIV positive individuals referring to Consultation Center for Behavioral Diseases, Sanandaj, Iran. The ELISA test was done on samples for anti-HCV antibodies. RNA was extracted from only anti-HCV antibody positive samples. An RT-PCR test was conducted to detect HCV RNA. Genotypes of HCV were detected by melting curve analysis by specific primers and probes. Test results and demographic information were analyzed by SPSS software. Results: The mean age of individuals was 39.3 ± 9.4 years. Out of 185 individuals 99 (53.5%) were positive for anti-HCV antibodies. Out of 99 antibody positive individuals, 44 had HCV RNA. Among 44 RNA positive individuals, genotypes and subtypes of HCV were as 26 (59.1%) 1a, 17 (38.6%) 3a and one (2.2%) 4. There was a significant association between an- ti-HCV antibody and demographic variables including, age, gender, occupation, and CD4+ T-cell count (p = 0.0001). Conclusion: The present study reveals that HIV/HCV co-infection is high in the study population. It is recommended similar studies should be done in other HIV infected populations for management of HIV/HCV co-infection

Background Compared to other countries in sub-Saharan Africa, Tanzania has a relatively progressive illicit drug harm reduction (HR) policy, through a predominantly opioid substitution therapy-based programme. However, access to hepatitis C virus (HCV) diagnosis and curative direct acting antiviral therapy remains elusive. We developed a cost-effectiveness model to evaluate a simplified HCV screening-and-treatment intervention amongst PWID in Dar-es-Salaam, Tanzania. Methods A decision tree and Markov state transition model compared existing practice (no access to HCV viral confirmation and treatment) with the integration of point-of-care HCV screening and treatment within (1) existing HR services and (2) expansion to include PWID not currently engaged in HR. Outcome measures were screening, treatment, HR and disease-related costs per PWID, quality-adjusted life years (QALY) and disability adjusted life years (DALY). Cost-effectiveness was evaluated from a healthcare payer's perspective over a 30-year time horizon over a range of willingness-to-pay thresholds (USD$273 to USD$1,050). Both deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses have been conducted. Results Assuming a chronic HCV prevalence of 18.8%, screening-and-treatment in existing HR settings resulted in an ICER per QALY-gained and DALY averted of USD$633 and USD$1,161, respectively. Expanding to include an outreach programme for unengaged PWID yielded an ICER per QALY-gained and DALY-averted of USD$4,091 and USD$10,288. Factors affecting the sensitivity of the ICER value included the cost of HR and the health utility of non-cirrhotic disease states. Conclusion Simplified HCV screening and treatment of PWID has the potential to be cost-effective in Dar-es-Salaam, Tanzania. In practice, synergism of human and financial resources with established health programmes may offer a pragmatic solution to minimise operational costs.

Background and AimsBetween 2014 and 2019, the SToP-C trial observed a halving in HCV incidence in four Australian prisons following scale-up of direct-acting antiviral (DAA) therapy. However, the contribution of HCV treatment to this decline is unclear because the study did not have a control group. We used modeling to consider this question.Approach and ResultsWe parameterized and calibrated a dynamic model of HCV transmission in prisons to data from each SToP-C prison on incarceration dynamics, injecting drug use, HCV prevalence trends among prison entrants, baseline HCV incidence before treatment scale-up, and subsequent HCV treatment scale-up. The model projected the decrease in HCV incidence resulting from increases in HCV treatment and other effects. We assessed whether the model agreed better with observed reductions in HCV incidence overall and by prison if we included HCV treatment scale-up, and its prevention benefits, or did not. The model estimated how much of the observed decrease in HCV incidence was attributable to HCV treatment in prison. The model projected a decrease in HCV incidence of 48.5% (95% uncertainty interval [UI], 41.9-54.1) following treatment scale-up across the four prisons, agreeing with the observed HCV incidence decrease (47.6%; 95% CI, 23.4-64.2) from the SToP-C trial. Without any in-prison HCV treatment, the model indicated that incidence would have decreased by 7.2% (95% UI, −0.3 to 13.6). This suggests that 85.1% (95% UI, 72.6-100.6) of the observed halving in incidence was from HCV treatment scale-up, with the remainder from observed decreases in HCV prevalence among prison entrants (14.9%; 95% UI, −0.6 to 27.4).ConclusionsOur results demonstrate the prevention benefits of scaling up HCV treatment in prison settings. Prison-based DAA scale-up should be an important component of HCV elimination strategies.

Introduction: Hepatitis B and C infection are responsible for more than 300 million of chronic liver disease patients all over the world. One goal of WHO 2030 agenda is the eradication of hepatitis B and C. However poverty is a great obstacle to achieve this goal. In Brazil, more than 13 million of people live in poverty (PLP) and could be vulnerable to HBV and HCV. Objectives: This study aims to determine HBV and HCV prevalence and analyze the response to HBV vaccination by measuring anti -HBs antibodies in serum samples from PLP. Methods: This was a cross­ sectional study carried out in rural settlement in the municipality of Sao Joao do Piaui, Northeast Brazil in March and July 2019. Participants were recruited in their homes and after signing the informed consent, they gave blood samples. A commercial ELISA was use d for measurements of antibodies against i) hepatitis B surface antigen (anti-HBs) and ii) hepatitis B core antigen (HBc) and of the hepatitis surf ace antigen (HBsAg). Nearly half of the population was female (51.0%). The mean age was 36.2±20.4 years, and about 43.2% received a monthly income of approximately $35.00 USD. Most are self­declared black or mixed race (81.9%), were married (50.1%), 15.5% was illiterate and 25.8% had a maximum of six years of formal schooling. Overall zero positivity for HBsAg, anti-HBc and anti -HBs determined by ELISA was 0.2%, 5.1 % and 43.9%, respectively. Anti-HBs reactivity was not associated with monthly income and schooling. Low rates of vaccination against hepatitis B were found among PLP in Northeast Brazil, highlighting the need for preventive actions towards this population segment, vulnerable and a potential disseminator of this infection. Strategies to increase HBV vaccination will be essential to eradicate hepatitis Band achieve the goals of WHO 2030 agenda. Report the levels of biochemical markers in CLD patients with or without COVID-19 to give more information that could help clinical monitoring.Study was approved by Brazilian Ethics Committee. Blood samples were collected after signed informed consent. Results: Most of individuals were male 56% (37/66) and mean age of population was 49±17 years. Six out 66 CLD patients were SARS CoV-2 RNA positive at baseline. At the end of follow-up, all of these 6 patients achieved SARS-CoV-2 clearance. At least once during follow-up, the CLD group versus CLD/COVID-19 group, 48% (29/60) vs. 17% (1/6) (P = 0.2) had abnormal alanine aminotransferase; 47% (28/60) vs. 17% (1/6) had abnormal aspartate aminotransferase (P = 0.21); 60% (36/60) vs. 67% (4/6) had abnormal γ-glutamyl transferase (P = 1.00), 32% CLD patients (19/60) had abnormal total bilirubin levels vs. none of the CLD/COVID-19 group (P = 0.17). Conclusions: Previous liver disease did not seem to increase the biochemical levels, except GGT, during COVID-19 infection. However, liver function monitoring is still essential for both COVID-19 patients with and without liver disease.

Transmission of Hepatitis C (HCV) continues via sharing of injection equipment between people who inject drugs (PWID). Network-based modelling studies have produced conflicting results about whether random treatment is preferable to targeting treatment at PWID with multiple partners. We hypothesise that differences in the modelled injecting network structure produce this heterogeneity. The study aimed to test how changing network structure affects HCV transmission and treatment effects. We created three dynamic injecting network structures connecting 689 PWID (UK-net, AUS-net and USA-net) based on published empirical data. We modelled HCV in the networks and at 5 years compared prevalence of HCV 1) with no treatment, 2) with randomly targeted treatment and 3) with treatment targeted at PWID with the most injecting partnerships (degree-based treatment). HCV prevalence at 5 years without treatment differed significantly between the three networks (UK-net (42.8%) vs. AUS-net (38.2%), p < 0.0001 and vs. USA-net (54.0%), p < 0.0001). In the treatment scenarios UK-net and AUS-net showed a benefit of degree-based treatment with a 5-year prevalence of 1.0% vs. 9.6% p < 0.0001 and 0.15% vs. 0.44%, p < 0.0001. USA-net showed no significant difference (29.3% vs. 29.2%, p = 0.0681). Degree-based treatment was optimised with low prevalence, moderate treatment coverage conditions whereas random treatment was optimised in low treatment coverage, high prevalence conditions. In conclusion, injecting network structure determines the transmission rate of HCV and the most efficient treatment strategy. In real-world injecting network structures, the benefit of targeting HCV treatment at individuals with multiple injecting partnerships may have been underestimated.

We hypothesize that patterns of sexual behaviour play a role in the conformation of transmission networks. If that was the case, behavioural grouping might in turn correlate with transmission networks and have the potential to predict proximity in viral phylogenies. To address this hypothesis, we present an intuitive approach for quantifying interactions between clusters of sexual behaviour along a virus phylogeny. Data from the Swiss HIV Cohort Study on condom use and incident Hepatitis C virus (HCV) sequences served as proof-of-concept. A strict inclusion criteria contrasting with relatively low HCV prevalence hindered our ability to identify significant relationships. This manuscript intends to serve as guide for studies aimed at characterizing interactions between behavioural patterns and transmission networks. Large transmission networks such as those of HIV or COVID-19 are prime candidates for applying this methodological approach.

Key Points Question What improvements in the hepatitis C (HCV) care cascade are required to eliminate HCV among people who inject drugs (PWID)? Findings This decision analytic model of HCV transmission found that improved testing, treatment, and access to harm reduction were all associated with reductions in HCV prevalence and mortality among PWID. Improvements in both testing and treatment were associated with HCV prevalence of less than 2% by 2030. Meaning These findings suggest that HCV elimination may be possible among PWID by 2030 with improved testing and treatment; improved harm reduction may reduce the time and number of treatments required to achieve similar outcomes., This decision analytical model evaluates potential improvements in the hepatitis C virus (HCV) care cascade among people who inject drugs (PWID), focusing on improved testing, treatment uptake, and access to harm reduction., Importance The success of direct-acting antiviral therapies for chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection led the World Health Organization to set elimination targets by 2030. For the United States to achieve these benchmarks, public health responses must target high-risk populations, such as people who inject drugs (PWID), a group with high rates of HCV incidence and low rates of treatment uptake. Objective To evaluate potential improvements in the HCV care cascade among PWID, focusing on improved testing, treatment uptake, and access to harm reduction. Design, Setting, and Participants This decision analytic model used a differential equation–based dynamic transmission model based on data from New Hampshire, an illustrative state with a large number of PWID and limited HCV treatment infrastructure. Surveillance data through 2020 was used for model parameterization, and the final analysis was conducted in May 2021. Main Outcomes and Measures Model forecasts of chronic HCV cases and advanced-stage HCV outcomes from 2022 to 2045. Results A total of 6 scenarios were tested: (1) the base case, (2) improved harm reduction, (3) improved testing, (4) improved treatment, (5) improved testing and treatment, and (6) improved testing, treatment, and harm reduction. All scenarios with improved testing, treatment uptake, and/or access to harm reduction were associated with decreases in forecasted HCV prevalence and HCV-associated mortality compared with the base case. Improving harm reduction, testing, and treatment individually were forecast to reduce prevalence of HCV in 2045 from 69.7% in the base case to 62.8%, 45.7%, and 35.5%, respectively. Combining treatment and testing improvements was associated with a 2045 prevalence of 0.3%; adding harm reduction improvements was associated with further reductions in prevalence forecasts (to 0.2%), with fewer total treatments (10 960 vs 13 219 from 2022-2045). Conclusions and Relevance In this modeling study, no single intervention was projected to achieve World Health Organization HCV elimination targets. Scenarios with improvements in both testing and treatment were associated with a prevalence of less than 3% by 2030 and achieved elimination targets. Adding improvements in harm reduction was associated with faster reductions in prevalence and fewer treatments.

Background The hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is a candidate disease for micro-elimination. Accurate baseline HCV prevalence estimation is essential to monitor progress to micro-elimination but can be methodologically challenging in low-endemic regions like the Netherlands due to lack of disaggregated data by age or risk-groups on the number of chronic HCV patients (i.e. HCV RNA positive). This study estimates the number of patients that has had a chronic HCV infection (ever-chronic) in the Utrecht region of the Netherlands. Methods In the Utrecht province in the Netherlands, positive HCV tests from the period 2001–2015 from one diagnostic center and four hospital laboratories were collected. A two-source capture-recapture method was used to analyze the overlap between the two registries (with 92% HCV RNA and 8% HCV immunoblot confirmed infections) to obtain the number of ever-chronic HCV infections in the Utrecht region. The Utrecht region was defined as an area with a 25 km radius from the Utrecht city center. The current viremic HCV prevalence was calculated by taking into account the proportion of cured and deceased HCV patients from a local HCV retrieval (REACH) project. Results The estimated number of ever-chronic HCV patients was 1245 (95% CI 1164–1326) and would indicate a prevalence of 0.10 (95% CI 0.09–0.10) in the Utrecht region. This is 30% (95% CI 21–38%) more than the number of known HCV patients in the records. The ever-chronic HCV prevalence was highest in the 1960–1969 age cohort (0.16; 95% CI 0.14–0.18). Since 50% of the HCV patients were cured or deceased in the REACH-project, the number of current viremic HCV patients was estimated at 623 individuals in the Utrecht region (prevalence 0.05%). Conclusion The results of this study suggest a low ever-chronic and current HCV prevalence in the Utrecht area in the Netherlands, but other studies need to confirm this.

Objectif : L'objectif était de comparer la séroprévalence du Virus de l'Immunodéficience Humaine (VIH) et des Virus des Hépatites B et C (VHB et VHC) chez les donneurs de sang prélevés lors des collectes mobiles et en collectes fixes au Centre National de Transfusion Sanguine de Bamako. Patients et méthodes : Il s'agissait d'une étude prospective transversale qui s'est déroulée sur 15mois à Bamako et environs. Un total de 6600 donneurs dont 3300 pour chaque type de cabines (mobile et fixe) ont été inclus en fonction de leur aptitude au don de sang. Les échantillons sanguins ont été testés par l'ELISA. Les données saisies sur EPI INFO 7.0, ont été analysées sur SPSS 20.0. Le test de χ2 a été utilisé pour comparer les proportions avec un seuil de significativité α fixé à 0,05. L'étude a été menée en respectant les règles d'éthique liées à la recherche sur les sujets humains en vigueur en République du Mali. Résultats : Le sex-ratio était de 4,96 en faveur des hommes et l'âge moyen était de 30,03 ± 9,04ans. Les prévalences du VIH, du VHB et du VHC étaient respectivement 2%, 18,1% et 3% chez l'ensemble des donneurs. Le sexe masculin et la tranche d'âge [18 - 25ans] étaient significativement les plus touchés par le VHB. La prévalence du VIH était significativement plus élevée en collecte mobile (2,5%) qu'en centre fixe (1,5%), p=0,003. Les prévalences du VHB et du VHC étaient égales pour les deux collectes, avec 18,2% et 3% pour les mobiles et 18% et 3% pour les fixes. Les coinfections étaient plus fréquentes en collecte mobile qu'en cabine fixe. Conclusion : La prévalence du VIH était élevée en collecte mobile qu'en fixe. Aucune différence de prévalences n'existait entre les deux types de collectes pour le VHB et le VHC. Afin de couvrir les besoins transfusionnels en qualité et en quantité suffisante un réajustement de stratégie semble plus que nécessaire. Cette nouvelle approche doit être focalisée sur la fidélisation des donneurs reçus aussi bien en cabine fixe qu'en collecte mobile, indemnes de toutes pathologies transmissibles par transfusion sanguine

Background We describe the initial results of an adult academic emergency department (ED) nontargeted hepatitis C virus (HCV) screening program serving Appalachia, which is disproportionately affected by the opioid epidemic. Methods The study was a retrospective screening study of ED systematic, nontargeted, opt-out HCV testing outcomes from July 2018 through September 2020. Eligibility requirements for “nontargeted” HCV testing included age ≥18 years, verbally able to communicate, receiving bloodwork already as part of routine clinical care, and not opting out of testing. For eligible individuals who did not opt out of testing, an HCV antibody (Ab) test was performed. Reactive Ab tests were confirmed with reflexive HCV RNA testing. The primary study outcome was the characterization of HCV Ab and RNA prevalence. Results There were 75 722 unique adult visitors during the period studied. Of these, 54 931 individuals were verbally engaged regarding testing and did not opt out. A total of 34 848 individuals received HCV Ab testing, with 3665 patients (10.5%) having reactive results. RNA confirmatory testing was reflexively performed in all Ab-positive patients, with 1601 (50.3%) positive. The majority of HCV Ab– and RNA-positive patients were young, born after 1965, and were more likely to be White, male, Medicaid insured, and report a history of injection drug use. Conclusions ED nontargeted, opt-out testing can identify a high prevalence of HCV infection among adult visitors. HCV infection was disproportionately high among younger, White individuals, likely reflecting the escalating syndemic of opioid injection and HCV transmission in Appalachia., Our HCV screening study from an ED serving Appalachia, a region severely impacted by the opioid epidemic, displays initial results from screening and epidemiological findings associated with Ab and RNA positive patients.

Background Previously the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommended targeted hepatitis C virus (HCV) screening for adults born between 1945 and 1965 and individuals with HCV risk factors. In April 2020, the CDC updated their recommendations to now include all individuals 18 years of age and older in settings with HCV prevalence > 0.1%. Few emergency departments (EDs) currently employ this nontargeted screening approach. Objectives We examined how a shift from targeted to nontargeted screening might affect HCV case identification. We hypothesized that nontargeted screening could improve HCV case identification in our ED. Methods Retrospective review of prospectively collected nontargeted screening data from June 6, 2018 to June 5, 2019 in a large urban academic ED. Patients 18 years of age and older, triaged to the adult or pediatric ED and able to provide consent for HCV testing, were eligible for study inclusion. Results There were 83,864 ED visits and 40,282 unique patients deemed eligible for HCV testing. Testing occurred in 10,630 (26.4%) patients, of which 638 (6%) had positive HCV antibody (Ab+) tests and 214 (2%) had a positive viral load (VL+). Birth cohort-targeted screening would have identified 48% of the patients with Ab+ tests and 47% of those who were VL+. Risk-based targeted screening would increase the number of Ab+ patients to 67% and VL+ to 72%. Conclusions Nontargeted ED-based HCV screening can identify a large number of patients with HCV infection. A shift from targeted to nontargeted screening may result in fewer missed infections but requires further study.

Over 70 million individuals are infected with hepatitis C virus (HCV) worldwide. Yet most prevalence data are in the adult population, with little focus on paediatrics, partially due to the scarcity of public data. The objective of this paper is to examine HCV prevalence in children by estimating prevalence rates among women, given the assumption that most cases are vertically transmitted. Between 2001 and 2017, maternal HCV infection affected ~ 0.24% of all births, with prevalence increasing by at least 261%. On average, approximately 0.01% of the total number of live births were infected with HCV, with a 245% increase in the number of children born with the infection. HCV epidemiology has evolved, with women of childbearing age representing a greater proportion of infected individuals in the United States, and infants born to infected mothers being at risk. We therefore recommend a greater public health focus of HCV on the paediatric population.

Although the prevalences of HIV and HCV are significantly higher amongst PWID in India compared to the general population, the strains circulating within this group have not been well-characterized. Through subgenomic sequencing of viruses present in residual plasma from an HIV/HCV prevalence study conducted amongst PWID across five cities in India in 2016–2017, a total of N = 498 HCV and N = 755 HIV strains were classified from N = 975 study participants. Considerable HCV diversity was identified, with different strains predominating in each region of the country. Overall, the most common strain was genotype 3a (39.0%), with genotypes 1a (26.9%), 1b (3.0%), 1c (0.2%), 3b (20.7%), 3i (2.0%), 4a (0.2%), 4d (1.0%), 6 (1.8%), 6n (4.8%), 6 v (0.2%) and one unclassifiable recombinant specimen (0.2%) also identified. The majority of the HIV specimens were subtype C (96.7%), although subtype A (0.4%), CRF01_AE (0.4%) and unique recombinant forms (URFs, 2.5%) were also detected. Notably, the geographical restriction of HIV subtype A and CRF01_AE, and HCV genotypes 4 and 6 to specific sites suggests distinct novel introductions of HIV and HCV into PWID populations, potentially via drug trafficking routes from neighboring countries where these strains are common.

OBJECTIVE The objective of this study was to assess the prevalence of hepatitis C virus (HCV) in regional Victoria and assess amenability to treatment. METHODS Households were randomly selected and one adult from each was invited to a 'clinic', which included HCV, liver function and liver stiffness/fibrosis tests. Participants reactive to HCV were asked about their amenability to treatment. RESULTS The study identified eight cases of HCV (antibody and PCR reactive, 1.1%) among 748 participants, half of which were new diagnoses. Most of the HCV-reactive participants were male (89%). Liver function and fibrosis were not significantly different between HCV-reactive and non-reactive participants. Most participants notified of their HCV were amenable to treatment. CONCLUSIONS The prevalence of HCV in this regional Victorian study (1.1%) was similar to the Australian modelled prevalence estimates. Most participants were amenable to treatment. Implications for public health: The unique opportunity to eliminate HCV requires a reorientation of the public health response toward systematic implementation of treatment to address barriers and reduce stigma and discrimination for marginalised populations. This should include targeting regional areas where the HCV prevalence of undiagnosed cases may be higher than metropolitan areas.

Organ transplant guidelines in many settings recommend that people with potential hepatitis C virus (HCV) exposure or infection are deemed ineligible to donate. The recent availability of highly-effective treatments for HCV means that this may no longer be necessary. We used a mathematical model to estimate the expected difference in healthcare costs, difference in disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) and cost-effectiveness of removing HCV restrictions for lung and kidney donations in Australia. Our model suggests that allowing organ donations from people who inject drugs, people with a history of incarceration and people who are HCV antibody-positive could lead to an estimated 10% increase in organ supply, population-level improvements in health (reduction in DALYs), and on average save AU$2,399 (95%CI AU$1,155-3,352) and AU$2,611 (95%CI AU$1,835-3,869) per person requiring a lung and kidney transplant respectively. These findings are likely to hold for international settings, since this policy change remained cost saving with positive health gains regardless of HCV prevalence, HCV treatment cost and waiting list survival probabilities. This study suggests that guidelines on organ donation should be revisited in light of recent changes to clinical outcomes for people with HCV.

OBJECTIVES This study aims to estimate the prevalence of hepatitis B (HBV) and C (HCV) in the population through field-screening camps conducted by Chennai Liver Foundation, in the southern state of Tamil Nadu, India. This is the largest population-based study from Tamil Nadu. PATIENTS AND METHODS A total of 75 camps were conducted across 14 districts of Tamil Nadu (2014-2017). Screening was done by rapid point-of-care assays (SD-bioline tests) and confirmed by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (Monolisa tests). Those tested negative were offered first dose of HBV vaccine. Positive patients with HBV count of more than 2000 IU/ml or HCV-RNA positive on quantitative analysis were treated. RESULTS A total of 18 589 people were screened, with HBV infection detected in 303 (prevalence 1.63%) and HCV infection in 56 (prevalence 0.3%), with significant variation among districts. Males contributed to about three-fourths of detected HBV [233/303 (77%)] or HCV [41/56 (73%)] infection. Screening detected a higher overall HBV/HCV infection rate in rural [203 (2.52%) infections in 8047 people] than in urban [156 (1.47%) infections in 10 542 people] areas (P

Background There has been an evolution in the treatment of chronic hepatitis C (HCV) due to highly effective direct-acting antivirals, however, restriction of treatment to medical specialists hinders escalation of HCV treatment. This is particularly true in resource-limited settings (RLS), which disproportionately represent the burden of HCV worldwide. The ASCEND study in Washington, DC, demonstrated that complete task-shifting can safely and effectively overcome a low provider-to-patient ratio and expand HCV treatment. However, this model has not been applied internationally to RLS. Method The validated ASCEND model was translated to an international clinical program in Kigali, Rwanda, aimed at training general medicine providers on HCV management and obtaining HCV prevalence data. Results The didactic training program administered to 11 new HCV providers in Rwanda increased provider’s knowledge about HCV management. Through the training program, 26% of patients seen during the follow-up period were screened for HCV and a prevalence estimate of 2% was ascertained. Of these patients, 30% were co-infected with hepatitis B. Conclusion The ASCEND paradigm can be successfully implemented in RLS to escalate HCV care, in a self-sustaining fashion that educates more providers about HCV management, while increasing the public’s awareness of HCV and access to treatment.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the prevalence of HIV, hepatitis C virus (HCV) infections, and related risky behaviours among inmates in Quebec’s provincial prisons between 2003 and 2014–2015. METHODS: Cross-sectional data were anonymously collected from May 2014 to March 2015 for men (n = 1315) and women (n = 250) and combined with data collected in 2003 to evaluate trends in the last decade. Participants completed a questionnaire and provided saliva samples. The data from the 2003 and 2014–2015 surveys were merged for statistical analysis. RESULTS: HIV prevalence was stable between 2003 and 2014–2015 for men (2.4% vs. 1.8%, p = 0.4), whereas it decreased for women (8.8% vs. 0.8%, p

Background: Hepatitis C virus (HCV) is a public health issue, worldwide. HCV infection during pregnancy is associated with vertical transmission. Objectives The current study aimed at investigating the prevalence of HCV in pregnant women. Methods: The current cross sectional study was conducted in Duhok, Kurdistan region of Iraq from January 2016 to December 2018. In the study, pregnant women were tested for HCV antibodies (HCV-Ab) positivity. The infection then was confirmed by HCV-real time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). Results: During the study, 37,200 pregnant women were recruited; 15 (0.04%) subjects were positive for HCV-Ab. To confirm the infection, HCV-RT PCR was performed for subjects with positive results and only three cases were confirmed using this method; giving a prevalence of 3/37,200 (0.001%). Conclusions: HCV prevalence in pregnant women was low in Duhok city. Continuous screening is required to control infection and prevent vertical transmission.

Recent advances in the treatment of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection have produced highly effective all-oral direct-acting antivirals (DAA) therapies with minimal side effects and short treatment duration. This is encouraging news for the 71 million persons estimated to be chronically infected with HCV worldwide.1 From a public health perspective, HCV prevalence shall be eliminated if available treatment is also targeted to those who most likely transmit the virus. Despite this scientific breakthrough, a systematic review from the USA described that of 43% of patients are aware of their HCV diagnosis, only 16% had begun treatment.2 Evidently, long-standing barriers to treatment need to be addressed for these effective therapies to be delivered. Therefore, in the DAA era, where treatment efficacy, side effects and duration are not a problem, identification of barriers that prevent the delivery of HCV care is an important issue that remains pending. Historically, multiple-layered barriers related to a patient, provider and structural factors may effectively prevent HCV linkage to care (figure 1): Figure 1 Overcoming barriers to increase access to hepatitis C treatment. HCV, hepatitis C virus. Patient-related factors are a common source of treatment deferral and limited awareness, poor adherence to physician recommendations and treatment fears. Patient unawareness of HCV infection represents one of the greatest obstacles to treatment. Efforts to scale up HCV diagnosis must include community education and stigma issues. Confusion about disease complications and modes of transmission is also common. Once HCV diagnosis is established, patients frequently fail to seek treatment probably because they may not recognise the urgency to treat this asymptomatic infection. In some regions, patients with HCV are more likely to be uninsured when compared with persons without HCV. Uninsured individuals are less likely to have regular visits with healthcare professionals, reducing the probability of diagnosis and treatment. …