Search

Objectives: Postoperative complications after Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) can dramatically compromise patient’s outcome. The aim of this study is to analyze the per- and postoperative short-term outcomes after LSG and to assess predictive risk factors of complications. Methods: The study group consisted of 790 patients (610 women and 180 men) who underwent LSG In 2014. All interventions were performed by 18 experienced surgeons members of the Club Coelio. Data about preoperative work-up, surgical techniques, 30-days postoperative morbidity and mortality were collected. Endpoints were perioperative morbidity and mortality and assessment of potential risk factors for complications. Results: Mean age and body mass index were respectively 39 years and 41.5kg/m2. Ninety-one patients (11.5%) had previous bariatric surgery. Morbidity rate was 4.7% (37/790) including 16 leaks (2.0%) and 9 bleedings (1.1%) and no deaths. Risk factors for leak were: previous adjustable banding (p =.0051), with no difference between removal of the banding and LSG in 1 or 2 steps, and type of endostapler (p =.0129). Conclusions: Leakage after Sleeve was rare but still observed even in experienced hands. The leak rate is particularly high when LSG is performed after adjustable gastric banding removal., SCOPUS: ar.j, info:eu-repo/semantics/published

We report the case of a male African patient who presented at day 8 of life with recurrent episodes of proximal small intestine occlusion, which was treated conservatively, because of misdiagnosis. Physical and cognitive development was normal throughout with, however, some episodes of stagnation. At the age of 15 years the recurrence of symptoms, not responding to the current conservative treatment, resulted in severe weight loss with BMI at 11 kg/m2. The oesogastroduodenal barium study disclosed an extrinsic duodenal compression compatible with a congenital duodenal band. Because of the major concerns related to the patient and to the medical environment, jejunostomy for feeding was first performed to improve his weight. A year later the intestinal malrotation was cured by gastrojejunal bypass. The postoperative clinical course was favorable. The patient resumed a normal life and schooling. His BMI is currently 21.5 kg/m2., SCOPUS: ar.j, info:eu-repo/semantics/published

Objectives: Sleeve gastrectomy (SG) has been used as the first step of a staged malabsorptive procedure for high-risk patients. More recently SG was proposed as an stand alone procedure in the treatment of morbidly obese patients. The aim of this study is to analyze perioperative outcome of morbid obese patients after SG. Methods: 301 patients, 201 women and 100 men, undergoing SG were retrospectively analyzed. SG was performed by 17 surgeons all member of the Club Coelio. The mean BMI was 44.7kg/m2 (27.4-70.3 kg/m2). 34 patients (11.3%) of our series had SG as revisional surgery. These revisional procedures consisted of 32 conversions from gastric banding, 1 conversion from vertical gastroplasty (VBG) and 1 from transoral endoscopic gastroplasty. Among the 32 patients that had revisional SG after a gastric banding, 13 bands were removed at least 3 months before the revisional SG and 19 bands were removed during the SG procedure. Endpoints were perioperative morbidity and mortality and potential risk factors for complications, mainly per or postoperative bleeding or leakage. Results: Overall mortality was 0% and morbidity was 10.3%. Perioperative bleeding occurred in 10 patients (3.3%), leakage in 12 patients (4%) patients and stenosis in 3 patients (1%). The risk of leakage was significantly higher after revisional bariatric surgery and in case of gastric perforation during surgery(p = 0.0001). Previous gastric banding is also associated with a higher risk of postoperative bleeding (p = 0.0006). Conclusions: SG can be safely performed but patients and surgeons must be aware of a higher risk of postoperative complications when SG is proposed as a revisional surgery., SCOPUS: ar.j, info:eu-repo/semantics/published

Purpose: A classification for primary and incisional abdominal wall hernias is needed to allow comparison of publications and future studies on these hernias. It is important to know whether the populations described in different studies are comparable. Methods: Several membersof the EHS board and some invitees gathered for 2 days to discuss the development of an EHS classific

A classification for primary and incisional abdominal wall hernias is needed to allow comparison of publications and future studies on these hernias. It is important to know whether the populations described in different studies are comparable., Comparative Study, Consensus Development Conference, Journal Article, Review, SCOPUS: ar.j, info:eu-repo/semantics/published

The QoL of the patients was greatly improved after antireflux surgery, but remained lower than that of a control group of healthy subjects. Better patient selection should improve the results. In our series, male patients or patients with a high preoperative GIQLI score were the best candidates for antireflux surgery.