Emerging adulthood, the new period which is especially prevalent in the developed or industrialized countries during ages 18 to 29, is a new conceptualization proposed by Arnett. Intimacy is a superordinate concept which includes intimate interaction and intimate relationship. This study includes two proceses which are scale development and conduction of gender differences about markers of starting romantic intimacy among Turkish emerging adults. In first process, Markers of Starting Romantic Intimacy Scale, with 17 items and 5 factors, was developed using by 220 participants. In the second step, the scale was administered to 318 Turkish male and female emerging adults between ages 22 and 25. Results show that there is no significant difference between gender and total score of the scale. With respect to gender, there are significant differences between gender and in four subscales which are self perception, affective and cognitive intimacy, self knowledge and romantic verbalizations. Moreover, there is no significant relationship between gender and behavioral intimacy subscale., {"references":["Register, L. and Henley, T. (1992) The Phenomenology of Intimacy.\nJournal of Social and Personal Relationships, 9,467-481.","Moss, B. F., & Schwebel, A. I. (1993). Marriage and romantic\nrelationships: defining intimacy in romantic relationships. Family\nRelations, 42, 7-31.","Robson, D. and Robson, M. (1998) Intimacy and Computer\nCommunication. British Journal of Guidance and Counselling,\n26(1):33-42.","Prager, K. J. (1995). The psychology of intimacy. New York: The\nGuilford Press.","Reis, H. T. ,& Shaver, P. (1988). Intimacy as interpersonal process. In S.\nDuck (Ed.), Handbook of Personal Relationships: Theory, relationships,\nand interventions (367-389). Chichester, UK: Willey","Sexton, R.E. , & Sexton, V.S. (1982). Intimacy: A historical perspective.\nIn M. Fisher and G. Stricker (Eds.), Intimacy (pp. 1-20). New York:\nPlenum.","Perlman, D. , & Fehr, B. (1987). The development of intimate\nrelationships. In D. Perlman & S. Duck (Eds.), Intimate Relationships:\nDevelopment, Dynamics, and Deterioration (pp. 13-42). Newbury Park,\nCA: Sage","Battarbee, K., Baerten, N. and Loeber, S. (2002) Pools and Satellites\nIntimacy in the City. Proceedings of DIS 2002, ACM, 237-245.","Chelune, G.J., Robison, J.T. and Kommor, M.J. (1984) A Cognitive\nInteractional Model of Intimate Relationships. In Derlega, V.J. (ed.)\n(1984) Communication, Intimacy, and Close Relationships. Academic\nPress, Inc., New York.\n[10] Cheal, D. (1987) 'Showing them you love them': Gift giving and the\ndialectic of intimacy. The sociological Review, 35(1):150-169.\n[11] Duck, S. (1994). Dynamics of relationships. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage\nPublications\n[12] Hatfield, E. (1988). Passionate and companionate love. In R. J.\nSternberg., & M. L. Barnes (Eds.), The pscyhology of love (p.191-213).\nNew Haven and London: Yale University Pres.\n[13] Sternberg, R. J. (1986). Triangulating love. Psychological Rewiev, 93,\n119-135.\n[14] Sternberg, R. J. (1988). A triangular theory of love. İn R.J. Sternberg., &\nM.L. Barnes (Eds.), The pscyhology of love (P.68-99). New Haven and\nLondon: Yale University Press.\n[15] Sternberg, R. J. (1999). Cupid-s Arrow: The Course of Love Through\nTime. UK: Cambridge Universty Press.\n[16] Erikson, E. H. (1968). Identity: Youth and crisis. New York: Norton.\n[17] Arnett, J. J. (2000). Emerging adulthood: A theory of development from\nthe late teens through the twenties. American Psychologist, 55, 469-480.\n[18] Arnett, J. J. (2004). Emerging adulthood: The winding road from the\nlate teens through the twenties. New York: Oxford University Press.\n[19] Arnett, J. J. (2001). Conceptions of the transition to adulthood:\nPerspectives from adolescence to midlife. Journal of Adult Development,\n8, 133-143.\n[20] Arnett, J. J. (2003). Conceptions of the transition to adulthood among\nemerging adults in American ethnic groups. In J. J. Arnett and N. L.\nGalambos (Eds.), New directions for child and adolescent development:\nExploring cultural conceptions of the transition to adulthood (No. 100,\npp. 63-76). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.\n[21] Casper, L. M., & S. M. Bianchi. (2002). Continuity and Change in the\nAmerican Family. Thousand Oaks: Sage.\n[22] Facio, A. & Micocci, F. (2003). Emerging adulthood in Argentina. In J.\nJ. Arnett and N. L. Galambos (Eds.), New directions for child and\nadolescent development: Exploring cultural conceptions of the transition\nto adulthood (No. 100, pp. 5-20). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.\n[23] Mayseless, O. and Scharf, M. (2003). What does it mean to be an adult?\nThe Israeli experience. In J. J. Arnett and N. L. Galambos (Eds.), New\ndirections for child and adolescent development: Exploring cultural\nconceptions of the transition to adulthood (No. 100, pp. 21-32). San\nFrancisco:Jossey-Bass.\n[24] Nelson, L. J. (2003). Rites of passage in emerging adulthood:\nPerspectives of young Mormons. In J. J. Arnett and N. L. Galambos\n(Eds.), New directions for child and adolescent development: Exploring\ncultural conceptions of the transition to adulthood (pp. 33-49). San\nFrancisco: Jossey-Bass.\n[25] Maccoby, E. E. (1998). The two sexes:Growing up apart, coming\ntogether. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.\n[26] Connely, J. & Goldberg, A. (1999). Romantic relationships in\nadolescence: The role of friends and peers in the emergence and\ndevelopmant. In W. Furman, B. B. Brown, & C. Feiring, (Eds.), The\ndevelopment of romantic relationships in adolescence (266-290).\nCambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.\n[27] Gray, M., & Steinberg, L. (1999). Unpacking authoritative parenting:\nReassesing a multiddimensional construct. Journal of Marriage on the\nFamily, 61,574-587.\n[28] Collins, W. A. (2003). More than myth: The developmental significiance\nof romantic relationships in adolescence. Journal of Research on\nAdolescence, 52, 25-42.\n[29] Lefkowitz, E.S., Bone, T. L., Shearer, C. L. (2003). Communication with\nbest friends about sex-related topics during emerging adulthood. Journal\nof Youth and Adolescence, 9, 52-57.\n[30] Brown, M.T. (1989). A cross-sectional analysis of self-disclosure\npatterns. Journal of Mental Health Counseling, 11, 384-395.\n[31] Duck, S. (1988). Relating to others. London: Sage Publications.\n[32] Duck, S. (1993). Induvidual in relationships. London: Sage\nPublications.\n[33] Bonn, S. D. (1994). Dispelling doubt and uncartainity: Trust in\nromantic relationships. In S. Duck (Eds.). Dynamics of relationships.\nLondon: Sage Publications.\n[34] Murstein, B. I. (1986). Paths to marriage. London:Sage Publications.\n[35] Myers, D. G. (1996). Social psychology. USA: The McGraw-Hill\nCompanies.\n[36] Guneri, O., Sumer, Z. & Y─▒ld─▒r─▒m, A. (1999). Sources of self-identity\namong Turkish adolescents, Adolescence. 34, 135, 535-546.\n[37] TDHS-2003, Turkey Demographic and Health Survey. (2004).\nHacettepe University, Ankara.\n[38] Ery─▒lmaz, A. Perceived control to start romantic intimacy at adolescence\nand young adulthood periods. paper presented at the Xth Conference of\nEuropean Association for Research on Adolescence, Antalya, Turkey,\nMay 2-6 2006.\n[39] Schwartz S., Cote J. and Arnett, J. J. (2005). Identity and agency in\nemerging adulthood:Two developmental routes in the individualization\nprocess. Youth and Society, Vol. 37 No. 2, December 2005 201-229.\n[40] Atak, H. & ├çok, F. Emerging adulthood and perceived adulthood in\nTurkey, 3rd Conference on Emerging Adulthood, Tucson, AZ, USA, 15-\n16 February 2007.\n[41] Altman, I. and Taylor, D.A. (1973) Social Penetration: The development\nof interpersonal relationships. Holt, New York.\n[42] Levinger, G. and Senn, D.J. (1967) Disclosure of feelings in marriage.\nMerill-Palmer Quarterly, 13, 237-249.\n[43] Kag─▒tc─▒bas─▒, C. (1996). Family and human development Across Cultures.\nLawrence Erlbaum Ass. NJ.\n[44] Atak, H., Adulthood criteria in Turkey: Equilibrium or limitation?, XIV.\nNational Psychology Congress, Hacettepe University, Ankara, 6-8\nSeptember 2006.\n[45] Buss, D., & Barnes, M. (1986). Preferences in human mate selection.\nJournal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 3: 559-570."]}