Search

Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared.

Background: Norway has a long coastline, steep mountains, and wide fjords, which presents some challenges to the prehospital emergency healthcare system. In recent years, the prehospital emergency medical services (EMS) have undergone significant changes, structurally, in terms of professionalisation of the services and in the education level of the personnel. In this article, we aim to describe the current structure for handling prehospital medical emergencies., Methods: For healthcare, Norway is divided into four Regional Health Authorities, consisting of 19 Health Trusts, where 18 have an EMS. There is a dedicated medical emergency number, 113, that terminates in 16 emergency medical communication centres. The use of air and boat ambulances, in addition to traditional ambulances, seeks to meet the challenges in the EMS system., Strengths and Limitations: The Norwegian EMS is an advanced system with highly educated staff; however, this level of care comes with an equally high cost., Conclusion: The Norwegian EMS can handle emergencies nationwide, providing advanced care at the scene and during transport. The geography and demography challenge the idea of equal care, but the open publishing of data from national quality registries seeks to identify and address potential differences., Competing Interests: The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: ‘Ingvild B.M. Tjelmeland: grants from the Lærdal Foundation for non-related research projects.’., (© 2023 The Author(s).)

Background: Perceptions about expected outcome after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) influence treatment decisions, and there is a need for updated evidence about outcomes for the elderly., Method: We conducted a cross-sectional study of cases reported to the Norwegian Cardiac Arrest Registry from 2015 through 2021 of patients 60 years and older, suffering cardiac arrest in healthcare institutions or at home. We examined reasons for emergency medical service (EMS) withholding or withdrawing resuscitation. We compared survival and neurological outcome for EMS-treated patients and explored factors associated with survival using multivariate logistic regression., Result: We included 12,191 cases and the EMS started resuscitation in 10,340 (85%). The incidence per capita of OHCA the EMS were alerted to was 267/100,000 in healthcare institutions and 134/100,000 at home. Resuscitation was most frequently withdrawn due to medical history (n = 1251). In healthcare institutions, 72 of 1503 (4.8%) patients survived to 30 days compared to 752 of 8837 (8.5%) at home (P <.001). We found survivors in all age cohorts both in healthcare institutions and at home, and most of the 824 survivors had a good neurological outcome with a Cerebral Performance Category ≤2 (88%)., Conclusion: Medical history was the most frequent reason for EMS not to start or continue resuscitation, indicating a need for a discussion about, and documentation of, advance directives in this age group. When EMS attempted resuscitation, most survivors had a good neurological outcome, both in healthcare institutions and at home., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)