Search

Abstract Background Obesity adversely impacts outcomes of total hip arthroplasty (THA), leading surgeons to impose body mass index cutoffs for patient eligibility and encourage preoperative weight loss. This study aimed to determine if preoperative weight loss impacts outcomes of THA in the general patient population and if it mitigates poor outcomes in obese patients. Methods Patients who underwent THA from 2013–2020 were identified in the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database. Patients were stratified by weight loss of >10% of body weight over the preceding 6 months. We used multivariable linear and logistic regression models, adjusted for age, sex, race/ethnicity, and comorbidities, to examine the effect of significant preoperative weight loss on 30-day outcomes after THA in the general and obese patient populations. Results In the overall population, patients who lost significant weight preoperatively had significantly increased length of stay, were more likely to have a non-home discharge, return to the operating room, or be readmitted, and were more likely to experience numerous medical complications. In the obese population, patients who lost significant weight preoperatively had significantly increased length of stay and were more likely to require a transfusion or experience any medical complication. Discussion Rapid significant preoperative weight loss is not associated with improved postoperative outcomes after THA in the obese population and is associated with worse outcomes in the general population. Arthroplasty surgeons should balance these risks with the risks of obesity when advising patients about preoperative weight loss prior to THA. Level of evidence III.

Abstract Background Body mass index (BMI) has been shown to influence risk for revision total hip arthroplasty (rTHA), but few studies have specifically examined which causes of rTHA are most likely in different BMI classes. We hypothesized that patients in different BMI classes would undergo rTHA for disparate reasons. Methods Ninety-eight thousand six hundred seventy patients undergoing rTHA over 2006–2020 were identified in the National Inpatient Sample. Patients were classified as underweight, normal-weight, overweight/obese, or morbidly obese. Multivariable logistic regression was used to analyze the impact of BMI on rTHA for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI), dislocation, periprosthetic fracture (PPF), aseptic loosening, or mechanical complications. Analyses were adjusted for age, sex, race/ethnicity, socioeconomic status, insurance, geographic region, and comorbidities. Results Compared to normal-weight patients, underweight patients were 131% more likely to have a revision due to dislocation and 63% more likely due to PPF. Overweight/obese patients were 19% less likely to have a revision due to dislocation and 10% more likely due to PJI. Cause for revision in morbidly obese patients was 4s1% less likely to be due to dislocation, 8% less likely due to mechanical complications, and 90% more likely due to PJI. Conclusions Overweight/obese and morbidly obese patients were more likely to undergo rTHA for PJI and less likely for mechanical reasons compared to normal weight patients. Underweight patients were more likely to undergo rTHA for dislocation or PPF. Understanding the differences in cause for rTHA among the BMI classes can aid in patient-specific optimization and management to reduce postoperative complications. Level of evidence III.

Abstract Introduction Early postoperative pain following total knee arthroplasty significantly impacts outcomes and patient satisfaction. However, the characteristics and sources of early pain after total knee arthroplasty remain unclear. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to determine the anatomic distribution and course of postoperative pain in the acute and subacute period following total knee arthroplasty. Methods A prospective observational study of primary, elective unilateral total knee arthroplasty cases was conducted at our academic tertiary care medical center from January 2021 to September 2021. Preoperative variables were extracted from institutional electronic medical records. Postoperatively, patients utilized a knee pain map to identify the two locations with the most significant pain and rated it using the visual analog scale (VAS). The data were collected on day 0, at 2 weeks, 2 months, and 6 months after operation. Results This study included 112 patients, with 6% of patients having no pain at postoperative day 0, 22% at 2 weeks, 46% at 2 months, and 86% at 6 months after operation. In those who reported pain, the VAS score (mean ± standard deviation) was 5.8 ± 2.4 on postoperative day 0 and decreased at each follow-up time point (5.4 ± 2.3 at 2 weeks, 3.9 ± 2.2 at 2 months, and 3.8 ± 2.7 at 6 months). The majority of patients were able to identify distinct loci of pain. The most common early pain loci were patellae, thigh, and medial joint line, and this distribution dissipated by 6 months. Conclusion At 2 postoperative weeks, pain was primarily at the medial joint, and at 6 months postoperatively, pain was more likely to be at the lateral joint. No relationship was found between pain at six months and pain scores or location at postoperative day 0 or 2 weeks. Understanding the distribution and progression of knee pain following total knee arthroplasty may benefit patient education and targeted interventions. Level of Evidence Level II, prospective observational study

Abstract Background Acute kidney injury (AKI) following total joint arthroplasty (TJA) is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) is used as an indicator of renal function. The purpose of this study was (1) to assess each of the five equations that are used in calculating eGFR, and (2) to evaluate which equation may best predict AKI in patients following TJA. Methods The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) was queried for all 497,261 cases of TJA performed from 2012 to 2019 with complete data. The Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) II, re-expressed MDRD II, Cockcroft-Gault, Mayo quadratic, and Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration equations were used to calculate preoperative eGFR. Two cohorts were created based on the development of postoperative AKI and were compared based on demographic and preoperative factors. Multivariate regression analysis was used to assess for independent associations between preoperative eGFR and postoperative renal failure for each equation. The Akaike information criterion (AIC) was used to evaluate predictive ability of the five equations. Results Seven hundred seventy-seven (0.16%) patients experienced AKI after TJA. The Cockcroft-Gault equation yielded the highest mean eGFR (98.6 ± 32.7), while the Re-expressed MDRD II equation yielded the lowest mean eGFR (75.1 ± 28.8). Multivariate regression analysis demonstrated that a decrease in preoperative eGFR was independently associated with an increased risk of developing postoperative AKI in all five equations. The AIC was the lowest in the Mayo equation. Conclusions Preoperative decrease in eGFR was independently associated with increased risk of postoperative AKI in all five equations. The Mayo equation was most predictive of the development of postoperative AKI following TJA. The mayo equation best identified patients with the highest risk of postoperative AKI, which may help providers make decisions on perioperative management in these patients.

Abstract Background Knee osteoarthritis (OA) is among the most common and disabling persistent pain conditions, with increasing prevalence and impact around the globe. In the U.S., the rising prevalence of knee OA has been paralleled by an increase in annual rates of total knee arthroplasty (TKA), a surgical treatment option for late-stage knee OA. While TKA outcomes are generally good, post-operative trajectories of pain and functional status vary substantially; a significant minority of patients report ongoing pain and impaired function following TKA. A number of studies have identified sets of biopsychosocial risk factors for poor post-TKA outcomes (e.g., comorbidities, negative affect, sensory sensitivity), but few prospective studies have systematically evaluated the unique and combined influence of a broad array of factors. Methods This multi-site longitudinal cohort study investigated predictors of 6-month pain and functional outcomes following TKA. A wide spectrum of relevant biopsychosocial predictors was assessed preoperatively by medical history, patient-reported questionnaire, functional testing, and quantitative sensory testing in 248 patients undergoing TKA, and subsequently examined for their predictive capacity. Results The majority of patients had mild or no pain at 6 months, and minimal pain-related impairment, but approximately 30% reported pain intensity ratings of 3/10 or higher. Reporting greater pain severity and dysfunction at 6 months post-TKA was predicted by higher preoperative levels of negative affect, prior pain history, opioid use, and disrupted sleep. Interestingly, lower levels of resilience-related “positive” psychosocial characteristics (i.e., lower agreeableness, lower social support) were among the strongest, most consistent predictors of poor outcomes in multivariable linear regression models. Maladaptive profiles of pain modulation (e.g., elevated temporal summation of pain), while not robust unique predictors, interacted with psychosocial risk factors such that the TKA patients with the most pain and dysfunction exhibited lower resilience and enhanced temporal summation of pain. Conclusions This study underscores the importance of considering psychosocial (particularly positively-oriented resilience variables) and sensory profiles, as well as their interaction, in understanding post-surgical pain trajectories.

A 51-year-old woman suffered cardiac arrest requiring emergent intraosseous access that abutted the tibial component of her total knee arthroplasty. She developed a wound at the site and knee pain which was concerning for deep infection. Subsequent imaging was consistent with osteonecrosis developing around the tibial component. The component eventually loosened, requiring a revision surgery. Her deep cultures remained negative throughout. Her findings are most consistent with osteonecrosis and aseptic loosening of her prosthesis. While intraosseous access may be beneficial during resuscitation, it has complications. This is the first reported case of osteonecrosis secondary to intraosseous access leading to prosthetic loosening necessitating a revision surgery.

Purpose. To review mid-term results after replacing the polyethylene liner in a well-fixed acetabular shell. Methods. 22 patients underwent replacement of the polyethylene liner in a well-fixed acetabular shell using cementation. The inner surface of the metal shell was scored with grooves (1 to 2 mm deep) for cement interdigitation. Trial liners were used to assess the appropriate size, with an aim to provide at least 2 mm of an even cement mantle behind the polyethylene liner. None of the liners were constrained or lipped. Clinical and radiographic outcomes were evaluated, and Harris Hip Scores obtained. Radiographic loosening of the acetabular shell was recorded. Implant survival was evaluated using the Kaplan-Meier estimator. Results. After a mean follow-up of 70 (range, 21–189) months, 17 patients had stable hips and their mean Harris Hip Score was 89 (range, 72–93). Four patients underwent re-revision after 28 to 108 months for aseptic loosening of the acetabular shell (n=2) and recurrent dislocation (n=2). One patient showed radiographic evidence of acetabular migration but was stable. The femoral components of all patients were stable. 92% of patients had good-to-excellent results. Implant survival at 60 months was 81% (95% confidence interval [CI], 51–94%); it became 91% (95% CI, 61–99%) if reductions for dislocations were excluded. Conclusion. Cementation of an undersized polyethylene liner into a non-modular shell is one option for revision of a well-fixed acetabular shells. Nonetheless, further follow-up is required to determine if it remains a viable option in the long term. If there is any doubt about the stability of the acetabular shell, a complete revision should be performed.