Search

Background Very limited studies, so far, have been conducted to identify the pharmacodynamic targets of cefepime, a well-established fourth-generation cephalosporin. As a result, conventional targets representing the cephalosporin class are used for cefepime target attainment analysis. Objectives We employed both a neutropenic murine lung infection model and an in vitro pharmacokinetic model (IVPM) to determine cefepime’s pharmacodynamic target [percentage of the dosing interval during which unbound drug concentrations remain higher than the MIC (%fT>MIC)] for bacteriostatic and 1 log10 kill effects. Methods Ten strains with cefepime MICs ranging from 0.03 to 16 mg/L were studied in the lung infection. In the IVPM, five cefepime-resistant strains with cefepime/tazobactam (fixed 8 mg/L) MICs ranging from 0.25 to 8 mg/L were included. Through 24 h dose fractionation, both in lung infection and IVPM (in the latter case, tazobactam 8 mg/L continuous infusion was used to protect cefepime), varying cefepime exposures and corresponding pharmacodynamic effect scenarios were generated to identify the pharmacodynamic targets. Results Using a non-linear sigmoidal maximum-effect (Emax) model, the cefepime’s plasma fT>MIC for 1 log10 kill in lung infection ranged from 17% to 53.7% and a combined exposure–response plot yielded 30%. In the case of IVPM, T>MIC ranged from 6.9% to 75.4% with a mean value of 34.2% for 1 log10 kill. Conclusions Both in vivo and in vitro studies showed that cefepime’s pharmacodynamic requirements are lower than generally reported for cephalosporins (50%–70% fT>MIC). The lower requirement for cefepime could be linked with factors such as cefepime’s better permeation properties and multiple PBP affinity-driven enhanced bactericidal action.

Sepsis is a life-threatening organ dysfunction resulting from inflammatory responses instigated by toxins secreted by bacteria. Immunomodulatory effect of clindamycin is earlier reported in a murine lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced sepsis model. There are no studies demonstrating the immunomodulatory effect of clindamycin in combination with ceftriaxone in a clinically relevant murine polymicrobial sepsis model induced by cecal ligation and puncture (CLP). Ceftriaxone is combined to control the bacterial growth. Following 3 h of CLP challenge, Swiss albino mice were administered vehicle, ceftriaxone alone (100 mg/kg, subcutaneously), and in combination with clindamycin at immunomodulatory dose (200 mg/kg, intraperitoneally). Survival was assessed for 5 days, and bacterial count and biochemical and physiological parameters were measured after 18 h of CLP challenge. Ceftriaxone alone caused significant reduction in bacterial count in blood, peritoneal fluid, lung, liver, and kidney homogenate which was not further substantially reduced by ceftriaxone and clindamycin combination. Day 5 survival was greatly improved by combination compared with ceftriaxone alone which was also evident through marked drop in blood glucose, total white blood cell (WBC) count, and body temperature. The combination group significantly mitigated the cytokine (tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α and interleukin (IL)-6) and myeloperoxidase (MPO) levels in plasma, lung, liver, and kidney of CLP-challenged mice, which further helped in significantly suppressing the elevated levels of liver and kidney function parameters. Clindamycin at immunomodulatory dose in combination with ceftriaxone attenuated organ damage and improved survival of septic mice by suppressing infection, inflammatory responses, and oxidative stress.

Acute lung injury is an inflammatory condition developed after severe sepsis in response to excessive secretion of pro-inflammatory cytokines. Doxycycline is widely reported to possess immunomodulatory activity through inhibition of various inflammatory pathways. Considering the broad spectrum of anti-inflammatory activity, protective effect of doxycycline was evaluated in clinically relevant murine polymicrobial sepsis model induced by caecal ligation and puncture (CLP). In this model, sepsis is accompanied with infection and therefore ceftriaxone at sub-protective dose was combined to retard the bacterial growth. Three hours after CLP challenge, mice were administered vehicle, ceftriaxone (100 mg/kg subcutaneously) alone and in combination with immunomodulatory dose of doxycycline (50 mg/kg, intraperitoneal) and survival were monitored for 5 days. Bacterial count in blood and peritoneal fluid along with cytokines [interleukin (IL)-6, IL-1β, tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-α] and myeloperoxidase (MPO) in plasma and lung homogenate were measured at 18 h post-CLP. Plasma glutathione (GSH) was also determined. Doxycycline in presence of ceftriaxone improved survival of septic mice by significantly reducing the plasma and lung pro-inflammatory cytokines and MPO levels. It also increased plasma GSH levels. Doxycycline did not improve antibacterial effect of ceftriaxone in combination, suggesting that the protective effect of doxycycline was due to its immunomodulatory activity. Doxycycline in the presence of ceftriaxone demonstrated improved survival of septic mice by modulating the immune response.

Levonadifloxacin and its prodrug alalevonadifloxacin are novel broad-spectrum anti-MRSA agents belonging to the benzoquinolizine subclass of quinolone, formulated for intravenous and oral administration, respectively. Various in vitro and in vivo studies have established their antimicrobial spectrum against clinically significant Gram-positive, Gram-negative, atypical, and anaerobic pathogens. The potent activity of levonadifloxacin against MRSA, quinolone-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, and hetero-vancomycin-intermediate strains is an outcome of its well-differentiated mechanism of action involving preferential targeting to DNA gyrase. Potent anti-staphylococcal activity of levonadifloxacin was also observed in clinically relevant experimental conditions such as acidic pH, the intracellular environment, and biofilms, suggesting that the drug is bestowed with enabling features for the treatment of difficult-to-treat MRSA infections. Levonadifloxacin also retains clinically relevant activity against resistant respiratory pathogens such as macrolide- and penicillin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae, Streptococcus pyogenes, Haemophilus influenzae, and Moraxella catarrhalis and, in conjunction with clinically established best-in-class human epithelial lung fluid concentration, has promising potential in the management of recalcitrant respiratory infections. Attractive features, such as resistance to NorA efflux, divergent mechanism of action in S. aureus, cidality against high-inoculum cultures, and low mutant prevention concentration, are likely to confer favorable resistance-suppression features to both agents. In vivo studies have shown promising efficacy in models of acute bacterial skin and skin structure infection, respiratory infections, pyelonephritis, and peritonitis at human-equivalent mouse doses. Both formulations were well tolerated in multiple phase I studies and overall showed a dose-dependent exposure. In particular, oral alalevonadifloxacin showed excellent bioavailability (~90%), almost mirroring the pharmacokinetic profile of intravenous levonadifloxacin, indicating the prodrug's seamless absorption and efficient cleavage to release the active parent drug. Hepatic impairment studies showed that clinical doses of levonadifloxacin/alalevonadifloxacin are not required to be adjusted for various degrees of hepatic impairment. With the successful completion of phase II and phase III studies for both levonadifloxacin and alalevonadifloxacin, they represent clinically attractive therapeutic options for the treatment of infections caused by multi-drug-resistant Gram-positive organisms. Herein, we review the current evidence on therapeutically appealing attributes of levonadifloxacin and alalevonadifloxacin, which are based on a range of non-clinical in vitro and in vivo investigations and clinical studies.

Cefepime/zidebactam is in clinical development for the treatment of carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative infections. MICs of cefepime/zidebactam (1:1) and comparators against Enterobacterales (n = 563), Pseudomonas (n = 172) and Acinetobacter baumannii (n =181) collected from 15 Greek hospitals (2014-2018) were determined by reference broth microdilution method. The isolates exhibited high carbapenem resistance rates [(Enterobacterales (75%), Pseudomonas (75%) and A. baumannii (98.3%)]. Cefepime/zidebactam showed MIC50/90 of 0.5/2 mg/L, against Enterobacterales including metallo-β-lactamases (MBL)-producers. Reduced susceptibility rates to tigecycline (16.8%), colistin (47.4%), ceftazidime/avibactam (59.8%), and imipenem/relebactam (61%) indicated high prevalence of multi-drug resistance among Greek Enterobacterales. Cefepime/zidebactam exhibited MIC50/90 of 8/16 mg/L against Pseudomonas including MBL-producers. The MIC50/90 of ceftazidime/avibactam and imipenem/relebactam were high (≥32 mg/L). Cefepime/zidebactam showed MIC90 of 64 mg/L against A. baumannii which is within its therapeutic scope. Other antibiotics including colistin showed limited activity against A. baumannii. The activity of cefepime/zidebactam against multi-drug-resistant isolates is attributable to zidebactam mediated novel β-lactam-enhancer mechanism.

In India and China, indigenous drug manufacturers market arbitrarily combined parenteral β-lactam and β-lactamase inhibitors (BL-BLIs). In these fixed-dose combinations, sulbactam or tazobactam is indiscriminately combined with parenteral cephalosporins, with BLI doses kept in ratios similar to those for the approved BL-BLIs. Such combinations have been introduced into clinical practice without mandatory drug development studies involving pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic, safety, and efficacy assessments being undertaken. Such unorthodox combinations compromise clinical outcomes and also potentially contribute to resistance development.

WCK 5222 is a combination of cefepime and the high-affinity PBP2-binding β-lactam enhancer zidebactam. The cefepime-zidebactam combination is active against multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria, including carbapenemase-expressing Acinetobacter baumannii The mechanism of action of the combination involves concurrent multiple penicillin binding protein inhibition, leading to the enhanced bactericidal action of cefepime. The aim of the present study was to assess the impact of the zidebactam-mediated enhanced in vitro bactericidal action in modulating the percentage of the time that the free drug concentration remains above the MIC (percent fT>MIC) for cefepime required for the in vivo killing of A. baumannii Cefepime and cefepime-zidebactam MICs were comparable and ranged from 2 to 16 mg/liter for the A. baumannii strains (n = 5) employed in the study. Time-kill studies revealed the improved killing of these strains by the cefepime-zidebactam combination compared to that by the constituents alone. Employing a neutropenic mouse lung infection model, exposure-response analyses for all the A. baumannii strains showed that the cefepime fT>MIC required for 1-log10 kill was 38.9%. In the presence of a noneffective dose of zidebactam, the cefepime fT>MIC requirement dropped significantly to 15.5%, but it still rendered a 1-log10 kill effect. Thus, zidebactam mediated the improvement in cefepime's bactericidal effect observed in time-kill studies, manifested in vivo through the lowering of cefepime's pharmacodynamic requirement. This is a first-ever study demonstrating a β-lactam enhancer role of zidebactam that helps augment the in vivo activity of cefepime by reducing the magnitude of its pharmacodynamically relevant exposures against A. baumannii.

Zidebactam and WCK 5153 are novel bicyclo-acyl hydrazide (BCH) agents that have previously been shown to act as β-lactam enhancer (BLE) antibiotics in Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter baumannii. The objectives of this work were to identify the molecular targets of these BCHs in Klebsiella pneumoniae and to investigate their potential BLE activity for cefepime and aztreonam against metallo-β-lactamase (MBL)-producing strains in vitro and in vivo. Penicillin binding protein (PBP) binding profiles were determined by Bocillin FL assay, and 50% inhibitory concentrations (IC(50)s) were determined using ImageQuant TL software. MICs and kill kinetics for zidebactam, WCK 5153, and cefepime or aztreonam, alone and in combination, were determined against clinical K. pneumoniae isolates producing MBLs VIM-1 or NDM-1 (plus ESBLs and class C β-lactamases) to assess the in vitro enhancer effect of BCH compounds in conjunction with β-lactams. Additionally, murine systemic and thigh infection studies were conducted to evaluate BLE effects in vivo. Zidebactam and WCK 5153 showed specific, high PBP2 affinity in K. pneumoniae. The MICs of BLEs were >64 μg/ml for all MBL-producing strains. Time-kill studies showed that a combination of these BLEs with either cefepime or aztreonam provided 1 to >3 log(10) kill against MBL-producing K. pneumoniae strains. Furthermore, the bactericidal synergy observed for these BLE–β-lactam combinations translated well into in vivo efficacy even in the absence of MBL inhibition by BLEs, a characteristic feature of the β-lactam enhancer mechanism of action. Zidebactam and WCK 5153 are potent PBP2 inhibitors and display in vitro and in vivo BLE effects against multidrug-resistant (MDR) K. pneumoniae clinical isolates producing MBLs.

Sepsis is a life-threatening systemic inflammatory condition triggered as a result of an excessive host immune response to infection. In the past, immunomodulators have demonstrated a protective effect in sepsis. Azithromycin (a macrolide antibiotic) has immunomodulatory activity and was therefore evaluated in combination with ceftriaxone in a clinically relevant murine model of sepsis induced by cecal ligation and puncture (CLP). First, mice underwent CLP and 3 h later were administered the vehicle or a subprotective dose of ceftriaxone (100 mg/kg of body weight subcutaneously) alone or in combination with an immunomodulatory dose of azithromycin (100 mg/kg intraperitoneally). Survival was monitored for 5 days. In order to assess the immunomodulatory activity, parameters such as plasma and lung cytokine (interleukin-6 [IL-6], IL-1β, tumor necrosis factor alpha) concentrations, the plasma glutathione (GSH) concentration, plasma and lung myeloperoxidase (MPO) concentrations, body temperature, blood glucose concentration, and total white blood cell count, along with the bacterial load in blood, peritoneal lavage fluid, and lung homogenate, were measured 18 h after CLP challenge. Azithromycin in the presence of ceftriaxone significantly improved the survival of CLP-challenged mice. Further, the combination attenuated the elevated levels of inflammatory cytokines and MPO in plasma and lung tissue and increased the body temperature and blood glucose and GSH concentrations, which were otherwise markedly decreased in CLP-challenged mice. Ceftriaxone produced a significant reduction in the bacterial load, while coadministration of azithromycin did not produce a further reduction. Therefore, the survival benefit offered by azithromycin was due to immunomodulation and not its antibacterial action. The findings of this study indicate that azithromycin, in conjunction with appropriate antibacterial agents, could provide clinical benefits in sepsis.