Search

Clinical outcomes for many childhood brain tumours remain poor, despite our increasing understanding of the underlying disease biology. Advances in molecular diagnostics have refined our ability to classify tumour types and subtypes, and efforts are underway across multiple international paediatric neuro-oncology consortia to take novel biological insights in the worst prognosis entities into innovative clinical trials. Whilst for the first time we are designing such studies on the basis of disease-specific biological data, the levels of preclincial evidence in appropriate model systems on which these trials are initiated is still widely variable. We have considered these issues between CONNECT, PNOC and ITCC-Brain, and developed a framework in which we can assess novel concepts being brought forward for possible clinical translation. Whilst not intended to be proscriptive for every possible circumstance, these criteria provide a basis for self-assessment of evidence by laboratory scientists, and a platform for discussion and rational decision-making prior to moving forward clinically.

The wide variety of clinical manifestations of the genetic syndrome neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) are driven by overactivation of the RAS pathway. Mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase inhibitors (MEKi) block downstream targets of RAS. The recent regulatory approvals of the MEKi selumetinib for inoperable symptomatic plexiform neurofibromas in children with NF1 have made it the first medical therapy approved for this indication in the United States, the European Union, and elsewhere. Several recently published and ongoing clinical trials have demonstrated that MEKi may have potential benefits for a variety of other NF1 manifestations, and there is broad interest in the field regarding the appropriate clinical use of these agents. In this review, we present the current evidence regarding the use of existing MEKi for a variety of NF1-related manifestations, including tumor (neurofibromas, malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors, low-grade glioma, and juvenile myelomonocytic leukemia) and non-tumor (bone, pain, and neurocognitive) manifestations. We discuss the potential utility of MEKi in related genetic conditions characterized by overactivation of the RAS pathway (RASopathies). In addition, we review practical treatment considerations for the use of MEKi as well as provide consensus recommendations regarding their clinical use from a panel of experts.

Background Selumetinib is the first approved treatment for pediatric patients with neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) and symptomatic, inoperable plexiform neurofibromas (PN) in the EU and US, as well as in multiple other countries. Evidence for the management of selumetinib-associated adverse events (AEs) is mostly limited to clinical trials and expanded-access programs. We gathered a panel of European healthcare practitioners with clinical experience prescribing selumetinib and/or managing pediatric patients with NF1-PN to provide recommendations on the prevention and management of AEs. Methods A modified Delphi approach was used to develop the recommendations among the group of experts. Initial statements were developed from a literature review of current management recommendations and regulatory reports. The panel refined the statements and rated the extent to which they agreed with them in 2 sessions and a follow-up survey. The panel comprised 2 pediatric neuro-oncologists, 1 pediatric oncologist, 1 pediatrician, 1 neuropediatrician, 1 oncologist, 1 neurologist, 2 psychologists, and 1 dermatologist. Results The experts agreed on the relative frequency and impact of AEs potentially associated with selumetinib. Consensus-level agreement was reached for 36 statements regarding the prevention and management of AEs potentially associated with selumetinib. Experts recommended treatments for AEs based on their experience. Conclusions The development of a variety of consensus statements indicates expert agreement on best practices for the prevention and management of AEs potentially associated with selumetinib in pediatric patients with NF1-PN. These events are generally manageable and should be considered alongside treatment benefit. Information sharing is warranted as further experience is gained. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims: The question of how to handle clinically actionable outcomes from retrospective research studies is poorly explored. In neuropathology, this problem is exacerbated by ongoing refinement in tumour classification. We sought to establish a disclosure threshold for potential revised diagnoses as determined by the neuro‐oncology speciality. Methods: As part of a previous research study, the diagnoses of 73 archival paediatric brain tumour samples were reclassified according to the WHO 2016 guidelines. To determine the disclosure threshold and clinical actionability of pathology‐related findings, we conducted a result‐evaluation approach within the ethical framework of BRAIN UK using a surrogate clinical multidisciplinary team (MDT) of neuro‐oncology specialists. Results: The MDT identified key determinants impacting decision‐making, including anticipated changes to patient management, time elapsed since initial diagnosis, likelihood of the patient being alive and absence of additional samples since cohort inception. Ultimately, none of our research findings were considered clinically actionable, largely due to the cohort's historic archival and high‐risk nature. From this experience, we developed a decision‐making framework to determine if research findings indicating a change in diagnosis require reporting to the relevant clinical teams. Conclusions: Ethical issues relating to the use of archival tissue for research and the potential to identify actionable findings must be carefully considered. We have established a structured framework to assess the actionability of research data relating to patient diagnosis. While our specific findings are most applicable to the pathology of poor prognostic brain tumour groups in children, the model can be adapted to a range of disease settings, for example, other diseases where research is dependent on retrospective tissue cohorts, and research findings may have implications for patients and families, such as other tumour types, epilepsy‐related pathology, genetic disorders and degenerative diseases. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Despite the fact that they are not typically life-threatening, low-grade gliomas (LGGs) remain a significant clinical challenge in pediatric neuro-oncology due to comorbidities associated with these tumors and/or their treatments, and their propensity to multiply recurs. LGGs, in total the most common brain tumors arising in childhood, can often become a chronic problem requiring decades of management. The Second International Consensus Conference on Pediatric Low-Grade Gliomas held in Padua, Italy in 2016 was convened in an attempt to advance the pace of translating biological discoveries on LGGs into meaningful clinical benefit. Topics discussed included: the implications of our growing biological understanding of the genomics underlying these tumors; the assessment of the model systems available; the implications of the molecular and histopathologic differences between adult and pediatric diffuse gliomas; and steps needed to expedite targeted therapy into late-stage clinical trials for newly diagnosed cases. Methods for the diagnostic assessment of alterations in the Ras/mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway, typical for these tumors, were also considered. While the overall tone was positive, with a consensus that progress is being and will continue to be made, the scale of the challenge presented by this complex group of tumors was also acknowledged. The conclusions and recommendations of the meeting panel are provided here as an outline of current thinking and a basis for further discussion.

High-grade gliomas in children are different from those that arise in adults. Recent collaborative molecular analyses of these rare cancers have revealed previously unappreciated connections among chromatin regulation, developmental signaling, and tumorigenesis. As we begin to unravel the unique developmental origins and distinct biological drivers of this heterogeneous group of tumors, clinical trials need to keep pace. It is important to avoid therapeutic strategies developed purely using data obtained from studies on adult glioblastoma. This approach has resulted in repetitive trials and ineffective treatments being applied to these children, with limited improvement in clinical outcome. The authors of this perspective, comprising biology and clinical expertise in the disease, recently convened to discuss the most effective ways to translate the emerging molecular insights into patient benefit. This article reviews our current understanding of pediatric high-grade glioma and suggests approaches for innovative clinical management.

BACKGROUND: LMD in children with recurrent medulloblastoma and other PNETs carries a poor prognosis and novel therapies are urgently needed to improve disease control. Somatostatin receptor-2 (SSR-2)is overexpressed in medulloblastoma and other central PNETs and can serve as a target for radionuclide tagged somatostatin analogues like 177Lu-DOTA-TATE that has shown considerable efficacy in adults with SSR-2 positive neuro-endocrine tumors. As a preliminary step prior to testing this agent in children with LMD, we performed an efficacy study of i.t. 177Lu-DOTA-TATE in athymic rats bearing LMD from MBL. METHODS: The subarachnoid space was accessed through the animal's cervical spine and a catheter was threaded along the dorsal aspect of spinal cord to the lumbar region and injected with 1 x 107 D341 human MBL cells and treatment initiated 3 days later. Groups of 10 animals received a single i.t. dose of 2, 3, or 5 mCi of 177Lu- DOTA-TATE or saline control. Animals were followed 300 days for survival. RESULTS: Treatment with 2 mCi resulted in an increase in median survival of 58.3% compared with saline control (p < 0.001). Treatment with 5.0 mCi of 177Lu-DOTA-TATE increased median survival by 75.0% compared with the saline control group while a single dose of 3.0 mCi 177Lu-DOTA-TATE increased median survival compared with saline controls by 519.4%. Long-term survivors were seen in 0 of 10 animals treated with saline, 4 of 11 treated with 3 mCi, and 3 of 12 treated with 5.0 mCi. CONCLUSION: Intrathecal 177Lu- DOTA TATE is efficacious in controlling LMD from medulloblastoma in athymic rats. A phase I trial of this agent is being planned in children with LMD from recurrent MBL and other CNS PNETs. INTRODUCTION: Medulloblastoma/PNET is the most common malignant brain tumor in children. For children older than 3 years, the treatment of high risk group includes surgery, craniospinal (CSI) radiation therapy (30-36 Gy) plus local boost radiotherapy (54-56 Gy) and adjuvant chemotherapy, such as cisplatinum, carboplatin, lomustine, cyclophosphamide, and vincristine. The results have demonstrated 5-year overall survival (OS) of 40-60%. This study aimed to evaluate the outcomes of high risk medulloblastoma/PNET patients who were treated with radiation and adjuvant chemotherapy. METHODS: Patients were diagnosed with high risk medulloblastoma/PNET according to the histopathology, medulloblastoma risk classification by an evidence of metastasis or the residual tumor more than 1.5 cm2 and evidence of residual tumor after surgery in PNET. Treatment protocol was CSI RT 36 Gy with local boost at tumor 54-56 Gy. Two to four weeks after RT, patients received 8 courses of chemotherapy consisting of cyclophosphamide 800 mg/m2, day 1-3 and vincristine 2 mg/m2, week 1-3, alternated with carboplatin 200 mg/m2, day 1-3 and etoposide 150 mg/m2, day 1-3. RESULTS: Total of 25 patients, male: female of 2.6:1 and mean ± SD for age of 9.7± 3.0 years, were enrolled. The 5-year progression free survival and OS were 41.6± 11.7% and 61.5± 12.9%,respectively. The age and sex did not determine the difference in outcomes. The hematotoxic side effect, according to the National Cancer Institute's Common Terminology Criteria, were grade 4 leucopenia 60%, grade 4 neutropenia 60%, grade 4 anemia 20%, grade 4 thrombocytopenia 16%, grade 3 leucopenia 20%, grade 3 neutropenia 20%, grade 3 anemia 40%, and grade 3 thrombocytopenia 36%. Febrile neutropenia was found in 11 patients (44%). CONCLUSION: The present study demonstrated the similar outcomes of high risk medulloblastoma/PNET with the previous studies. Although, the grade 3 and 4 hematologic toxicity was high, no treatment related death was found. OBJECTIVE: Recent investigations revealed an association between transcriptional subtypes and morphological features in medulloblastoma. Since both characteristics are of prognostic significance, a precise correlation between them should be well established. Therefore we re-examined paediatric nodular medulloblastoma tumours for correlation with molecular subtypes of disease. METHODS: Paediatric patients with previously diagnosed desmoplastic/nodular (D/N) or medulloblastoma with extensive nodularity (MBEN) histopathology were re-analysed by two neuropathologists. In addition to H&E-stained slides, reticulin preparations were simultaneously analysed from the same FFPE blocks. For identification of transcriptional subtypes of tumours immunohistopathological analyses were performed using a panel of representative antibodies. MYCC amplification was detected by FISH. RESULTS: Altogether 28 tumours with original MBEN or D/N diagnosis where molecular subtypes could be determined were identified. All tumours with MBEN histology belonged to SHH group and displayed distinctive reticulin-positive internodular reaction. However, only ∼60% of tumours with original D/N diagnosis were reticulin-positive. They belonged to SHH type, were mainly infantile and patients are still alive. Among reticulin-negative tumours only two were of the SHH type and were subsequently reclassified as classic and anaplastic tumours with pseudonodules. Importantly, all remaining reticulin-negative tumours with a presence of nodules in H&E staining belonged to the non-WNT,SHH type. Therefore the original diagnosis was again reclassified as classic or anaplastic tumours with pseudonodules. Patients from this group were only males, with median age 14 years old, one had MYCC amplification and two of them died because of disease. Therefore, non-WNT,SHH tumours did not display typical desmoplastic/nodular histology accompanied by reticulin positive reaction as opposite to truly D/N tumours being typical for SHH molecular group (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Reticulin staining is necessary to distinguish two different biologically and clinically group of nodular tumours which appear morphologically similar under H&E staining alone. BACKGROUND: In the PNET4 European randomised controlled trial, children with standard risk medulloblastoma were allocated to HFRT or to STRT. All received maintenance chemotherapy. Event-free survival was similar between the two treatment arms. HFRT was associated with worse growth and better questionnaire-based executive function 6.1 years post-diagnosis, especially in children aged 8 years at diagnosis. In children aged .10); WMI (5.20 [-2.07 to 12.47], p > .10), PSI (10.91 [-1.54 to 23.36], p = .08; FSIQ (5.28 [-4.23 to 14.79], p > .10). CONCLUSION: HFRT was associated with higher verbal IQ in children aged

Criteria for new drug approval include demonstration of efficacy. In neuro-oncology, this is determined radiographically utilizing tumor measurements on MRI scans. Limitations of this method have been identified where drug activity is not reflected in decreased tumor size. The RANO (Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology) working group was established to address limitations in defining endpoints for clinical trials in adult neuro-oncology and to develop standardized response criteria. RAPNO was subsequently established to address unique issues in pediatric neuro-oncology. The aim of this paper is to delineate response criteria issues in pediatric clinical trials as a basis for subsequent recommendations.

UnlabelledChildren and young adults with glioblastoma (GBM) have a median survival rate of only 12 to 15 months, and these GBMs are clinically and biologically distinct from histologically similar cancers in older adults. They are defined by highly specific mutations in the gene encoding the histone H3.3 variant H3F3A , occurring either at or close to key residues marked by methylation for regulation of transcription—K27 and G34. Here, we show that the cerebral hemisphere-specific G34 mutation drives a distinct expression signature through differential genomic binding of the K36 trimethylation mark (H3K36me3). The transcriptional program induced recapitulates that of the developing forebrain, and involves numerous markers of stem-cell maintenance, cell-fate decisions, and self-renewal.Critically, H3F3A G34 mutations cause profound upregulation of MYCN , a potent oncogene that is causative of GBMs when expressed in the correct developmental context. This driving aberration is selectively targetable in this patient population through inhibiting kinases responsible for stabilization of the protein.SignificanceWe provide the mechanistic explanation for how the fi rst histone gene mutation inhuman disease biology acts to deliver MYCN, a potent tumorigenic initiator, into a stem-cell compartment of the developing forebrain, selectively giving rise to incurable cerebral hemispheric GBM. Using synthetic lethal approaches to these mutant tumor cells provides a rational way to develop novel and highly selective treatment strategies

Greater collaboration needed to realize potential of molecular profiling initiatives for pediatric cancers. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]