Search

Chronic complications of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and highly active retroviral therapy have become increasingly relevant as life expectancy for HIV patients has improved and the affected population ages. HIV-associated lipodystrophy syndrome is characterised by an abnormal fat distribution syndrome associated with metabolic disturbances including insulin resistance, and deranged glucose and lipid metabolism. It is associated with increased risks of progression to type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease. Lipodystrophy is a clinical diagnosis and mostly subjective as standardised diagnostic criteria have not yet been defined. Several therapeutic interventions have been investigated including lifestyle therapy, vitamin supplements, switching antiretroviral therapy and specific therapies for insulin resistance and hyperlipidaemia. Current management options for HIV associated lipodystrophy are limited and are mostly based on avoidance of risk factors and switching of antiretroviral drugs. Therapies to improve insulin resistance have been tried but they are frequently ineffective as are lipid-lowering drugs. Interest in anabolic agents has been resurrected and new clinical data suggest that HIV-associated lipodystrophy growth hormone releasing factor therapy may have a beneficial role in the treatment of HIV-associated lipodystrophy. However, there still remains a need for robust prospective cohort studies and well designed intervention trials to resolve the aetiology and define the best treatment for this complication of HIV disease and its treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

These two Phase I, open-label, single-dose, randomized, crossoverstudies in 40 healthymale subjects investigated the pharmacokinetic and safety profiles of various formulations of the amprenavir prodrug GW433908 in the presence and absence of food compared with amprenavir capsules. GW433908 is a phosphate ester prodrug of the antiretroviral protease inhibitor amprenavir, with improved solubility over the parent molecule and a potential for reduced pill burden on current dosing regimens. The calcium salt of the prodrug, GW433908G, was selected for further investigation, as it appeared to offer the greatest potential for the development of new drug formulations. In the fasting state, (1) GW433908G tablet and suspension were bioequivalent in terms of both AUC and Cmax, and (2) GW433908G tablet and suspension were bioequivalent to amprenavir capsules for AUC; however, Cmax was lower with GW433908G. After a high-fat meal compared with fasting, (1) the bioavailability of GW433908G suspension was decreased by 20% and Cmax by 41%, and (2) for GW433908G tablets, there was no influence on AUC(12% lower Cmax). After a low-fat meal compared with fasting, (1) there was bioequivalence for GW433908G tablets, but (2) bioavailability was decreased by 23% for amprenavir capsules (Cmax was also lower, by 46%). Overall, for GW433908G and amprenavir capsules, food had a negligible influence on plasma concentration at 12 hours postdose (C12). Whether administered as tablets or suspension, GW433908G pharmacokinetics was only slightly affected by food. GW433908G tablets were well tolerated and delivered plasma amprenavir concentrations equivalent to the recommended therapeutic amprenavir dose but with fewer tablets. The possibility of a lower pill burden offered by GW433908 may be of clinical benefit in the treatment of HIV infection. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The aim of the current study was to characterize the pharmacokinetics of GW420867X, a new nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor, using a single escalating dose protocol in healthy volunteers. Four dose levels were investigated in sequential order: 300, 600, 900, and 1200 mg, with a ratio of 4:1 subjects receiving active or placebo treatment, respectively. Following single-dose administration, GW420867X was readily absorbed with a median time to peak concentration of 3 to 5 hours. GW420867X plasma exposure (AUC) was dose proportional but variable within the 300 to 1200 mg dose range. Less than dose-proportional increases were observed for Cmax. The terminal elimination t(1/2) was 50 hours, which supports once-daily dosing in future studies. Plasma trough concentrations of GW420867X at 24 hours after dosing were many fold greater than the in vitro IC50 HIV-1(HXB2) in MT4 cells. GW420867X was generally well tolerated following single-dose administration up to 900 mg; increased central nervous system-related adverse events were observed at higher doses. GW420867X had a favorable pharmacokinetic and safety profile that would enable this drug to be explored in future clinical studies with HIV-1 infected patients at doses that would provide appropriate safety and efficacy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The Association for Human Pharmacology in the Pharmaceutical Industry's annual meeting focused on current and impending challenges facing the United Kingdom's (UK) pharmaceutical industry and how these opportunities can inspire innovation and best practice. The UK pharmaceutical landscape is still evolving following Brexit and learnings from the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. As such, the UK's clinical community is in a unique position to steer innovation in a meaningful direction. With the continuation of remote forms of working, further opportunities have arisen to support novel practices away from the clinic. The keynote speaker reflected on clinical development over the past 40 years and how the industry must continue to concentrate on patient welfare. The future of drug development was discussed regarding challenges associated with developing translational gene therapies, and the status of investment markets analyzed from a business strategy and consulting perspective. The patient viewpoint was a core theme throughout the conference with patient-centric blood sampling and decentralized clinical trials providing suggestions for how the industry can save costs and increase efficiency. Moreover, the patient perspective was central to a debate over whether ethics requirements should be the same for oncology patients taking part in first-in-human studies as those for healthy subjects. Discussions continued around the changing roles of the Qualified Person and Principal Investigators which underpins how sponsors may want to run future trials in the UK. Lessons learned from conducting challenge trials in healthy volunteers and patients were discussed following a presentation from the serving Chair of the COVID-19 challenge ethics committee. The current state of interactions with the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency were also explored. It was considered how the immediate future for the UK clinical trials community is inevitably still linked with Europe; the newly implemented European Medicines Agency Clinical Trials Information System has been met with lukewarm responses, providing a promising opportunity to ensure UK Phase I units continue to play a vital role in global research., Competing Interests: Authors CM and TH were employed by Niche Science & Technology Ltd. Author JB was employed by Covance Clinical Research Unit Ltd. Authors UL and JT were employed by Richmond Pharmacology Ltd. Author SS was employed by Alwyn Consulting. Author KW was employed by Weatherden Ltd. The remaining author declares that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2023 Mundy, Bush, Cheriyan, Lorch, Stringer, Taubel, Wydenbach and Hardman.)

Background: Patients with type-2 (T2) cytokine-low severe asthma often have persistent symptoms despite suppression of T2 inflammation with corticosteroids., Objectives: We sought to analyze whole blood transcriptome from 738 samples in T2-biomarker-high/-low patients with severe asthma to relate transcriptomic signatures to T2 biomarkers and asthma symptom scores., Methods: Bulk RNA-seq data were generated for blood samples (baseline, week 24, week 48) from 301 participants recruited to a randomized clinical trial of corticosteroid optimization in severe asthma. Unsupervised clustering, differential gene expression analysis, and pathway analysis were performed. Patients were grouped by T2-biomarker status and symptoms. Associations between clinical characteristics and differentially expressed genes (DEGs) associated with biomarker and symptom levels were investigated., Results: Unsupervised clustering identified 2 clusters; cluster 2 patients were blood eosinophil-low/symptom-high and more likely to be receiving oral corticosteroids (OCSs). Differential gene expression analysis of these clusters, with and without stratification for OCSs, identified 2960 and 4162 DEGs, respectively. Six hundred twenty-seven of 2960 genes remained after adjusting for OCSs by subtracting OCS signature genes. Pathway analysis identified dolichyl-diphosphooligosaccharide biosynthesis and assembly of RNA polymerase I complex as significantly enriched pathways. No stable DEGs were associated with high symptoms in T2-biomarker-low patients, but numerous associated with elevated T2 biomarkers, including 15 that were upregulated at all time points irrespective of symptom level., Conclusions: OCSs have a considerable effect on whole blood transcriptome. Differential gene expression analysis demonstrates a clear T2-biomarker transcriptomic signature, but no signature was found in association with T2-biomarker-low patients, including those with a high symptom burden., (Crown Copyright © 2023. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

A workshop held at the 18th Annual Conference of the Pharmaceutical Contract Management Group in Krakow on 9 September 2022 asked over 200 delegates what the clinical trial landscape would look like in 2050. Issues considered included who will be running the pharmaceutical industry in 2050; how 'health chips', wearables and diagnostics will impact on finding the right patients to study; how will artificial intelligence be designing and controlling clinical trials; and what will the role of the Clinical Research Associate, the critical observer, documenter and conductor of a clinical trial need to look like by 2050. The consensus was that, by 2050, if you are working in clinical trials, you will be a data scientist. We can expect to see an increasing role of new technologies and a new three-phase registration model for novel therapies. The first phase will involve an aspect of quality evaluation and biological proof-of-concept probably involving more preclinical modelling and engineered human cell lines and fewer animal studies than currently used. Once registered, new products will enter a period of adaptive clinical development (delivered as a single study) intended to establish safety. This phase will most likely take around 1-2 years and explore tailored options for administration. Investigations will most likely be conducted in patients, possibly in a 'patient-in-a-box' setting (hospital or healthcare centre, virtual or microsite). On completion of safety licencing, drugs will begin an assessment of efficacy in partnership with those responsible for reimbursement - testing will be performed in patients, possibly where individual patient involvement in safety testing will offer some reimbursement deal for future treatment. Change is coming, though its precise form will likely depend on the creativity and vision of sponsors, regulators and payers., Competing Interests: Disclosure and potential conflicts of interest: The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest relevant to this manuscript. The International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) Potential Conflicts of Interests form for the authors is available for download at: https://www.drugsincontext.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/dic.2023-2-2-COI.pdf, (Copyright © 2023 Hardman TC, Aitchison R, Scaife R, Edwards J, Slater G on behalf of the Committee of the Pharmaceutical Contract Management Group.)

Background: Approximately 5% to 10% of patients with asthma have severe disease, with a consistent preponderance in females. Current asthma guidelines recommend stepwise treatment to achieve symptom control with no differential treatment considerations for either sex., Objective: To examine whether patient sex affects outcomes when using a composite T2-biomarker score to adjust corticosteroid (CS) treatment in patients with severe asthma compared with standard care., Methods: This is a post hoc analysis, stratifying patient outcomes by sex, of a 48-week, multicenter, randomized controlled clinical trial comparing a biomarker-defined treatment algorithm with standard care. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients with a reduction in CS treatment (inhaled and oral corticosteroids). Secondary outcomes included exacerbation rates, hospital admissions, and lung function., Results: Of the 301 patients randomized, 194 (64.5%) were females and 107 (35.5%) were males. The biomarker algorithm led to a greater proportion of females being on a lower CS dose versus standard care, which was not seen in males (effect estimate: females, 3.57; 95% CI, 1.14-11.18 vs males, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.16-1.80). In T2-biomarker-low females, reducing CS dose was not associated with increased exacerbations. Females scored higher in all domains of the 7-item Asthma Control Questionnaire, apart from FEV1, but with no difference when adjusted for body mass index/anxiety and/or depression. Dissociation between symptoms and T2 biomarkers were noted in both sexes, with a higher proportion of females being symptom high/T2-biomarker low (22.8% vs 15.6%; P = .0002), whereas males were symptom low/T2-biomarker high (22.3% vs 11.4%; P < .0001)., Conclusions: This exploratory post hoc analysis identified that females achieved a greater benefit from biomarker-directed CS optimization versus symptom-directed treatment., (Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Rationale: The past 25 years have seen huge progress in understanding of the pathobiology of type-2 (T2) asthma, identification of measurable biomarkers, and the emergence of novel monoclonal antibody treatments. Although present in a minority of patients with severe asthma, very little is known about the mechanisms underlying T2-low asthma, making it a significant unmet need in asthma research. Objectives: The objective of this study was to explore the differences between study exacerbators and nonexacerbators, to describe physiological changes at exacerbation in those who are T2 HIGH and T2 LOW at the time of exacerbation, and to evaluate the stability of inflammatory phenotypes when stable and at exacerbation. Methods: Exacerbation assessment was a prespecified secondary analysis of data from a 48-week, multicenter, randomized controlled clinical study comparing the use of biomarkers and symptoms to adjust steroid treatment in a T2-low severe asthma-enriched cohort. Participants were phenotyped as T2 LOW (fractional exhaled nitric oxide ⩽ 20 ppb and blood eosinophil count ⩽ 150 cells/µl) or T2 HIGH (fractional exhaled nitric oxide > 20 or blood eosinophil count > 150) at study enrollment and at each exacerbation. Here, we report the findings of the exacerbation analyses, including comparison of exacerbators and nonexacerbators, the physiological changes at exacerbation in those who had evidence of T2 biology at exacerbation versus those that did not, and the stability of inflammatory phenotypes when stable and at exacerbation. Measurements and Main Results: Of the 301 participants, 60.8% (183) had one or more self-reported exacerbations (total of 390). Exacerbators were more likely to be female, have a higher body mass index, and have more exacerbations requiring oral corticosteroid and unscheduled primary care attendances for exacerbations. At enrollment, 23.6% (71) were T2 LOW and 76.4% (230) T2 HIGH . The T2 LOW group had more asthma primary care attendances, were more likely to have a previous admission to HDU (high dependency unit)/ICU and to be receiving maintenance oral corticosteroids. At exacerbation, the T2 LOW events were indistinguishable from T2 HIGH exacerbations in terms of lung function (mean fall in T2 LOW FEV 1, 200 [400] ml vs. T2 HIGH 200 [300] ml; P  = 0.93) and symptom increase (ACQ5: T2 LOW , 1.4 [0.8] vs. T2 HIGH , 1.3 [0.8]; P  = 0.72), with no increase in T2 biomarkers from stable to exacerbation state in the T2 LOW exacerbations. The inflammatory phenotype within individual patients was dynamic; inflammatory phenotype at study entry did not have a significant association with exacerbation phenotype. Conclusions: Asthma exacerbations demonstrating a T2 LOW phenotype were physiologically and symptomatically similar to T2 HIGH exacerbations. T2 LOW asthma was an unstable phenotype, suggesting that exacerbation phenotyping should occur at the time of exacerbation. The clinically significant exacerbations in participants without evidence of T2 biology at the time of exacerbation highlight the unmet and pressing need to further understand the mechanisms at play in non-T2 asthma. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02717689).

Background: Evidence-based therapies used to treat coronavirus disease (COVID-19) remain limited. Azoximer bromide (AZB; Polyoxidonium ® ) is an immunomodulating molecule frequently used in the Russian Federation. It offers demonstrable therapeutic benefit in upper respiratory tract infections. This study evaluated the safety and efficacy of AZB when used in combination with standard of care treatment in patients hospitalized with COVID-19., Methods: Hospitalized patients with COVID-19 ( n =81; nine sites) received AZB 12 mg intravenously once daily for 3 days then intramuscularly every other day until day 17. The primary endpoint included clinical status at day 15 versus baseline. Historical control data of 100 patients from a randomized, controlled, open-label trial conducted in China were included to serve as a direct control group., Results: Notable clinical improvement, assessed by seven-point ordinal scale (OS) score and National Early Warning Score, was observed. Mean duration of hospitalization was 19.3 days. Indicators of pneumonia and lung function showed gradual recovery to normalization. No patients died but, by day 28, one patient still required respiratory support; this patient died on day 34. A higher proportion of patients receiving AZB required invasive or non-invasive ventilation (OS 5 or 6) at baseline compared with the historical control group. Improvement in mean OS score by day 14/15 was not notable in the control group (OS 3.99-3.87) but was clear in the AZB group (OS 4.36-2.90). Mean duration of hospitalization was similar in the control group (16.0 days); however, day 28 mortality was higher, at 25.0% ( n =25)., Conclusion: AZB combined with standard of care was safe and well tolerated. An apparent clinical improvement could not be fully evaluated due to the lack of a direct control group; further assessment of AZB for the treatment of COVID-19 in a randomized, placebo-controlled study is warranted., Competing Interests: Disclosure and potential conflicts of interest: AAT and NFK are employees of NPO Petrovax Pharm LLC. FH and TCH work for organizations contracted by NPO Petrovax Pharm. J-FR is a consultant for NPO Petrovax Pharm. All other authors do not have any conflicting or competing interests. The International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) Potential Conflicts of Interests form for the authors is available for download at: https://www.drugsincontext.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/dic.2022-1-1-COI.pdf, (Copyright © 2022 Efimov SV, Matsiyeuskaya NV, Boytsova OV, Akhieva LY, Kuntsevich EV, Troshina AA, Kvasova EI, Tikhonov AA, Khomyakova NF, Harrison F, Rossi JF, Hardman TC.)

Background: Understanding why patients with severe asthma do not follow healthcare provider (HCP) advice to adjust treatment is critical to achieving personalised disease management., Methods: We reviewed patient choice to follow HCP advice to adjust asthma treatment in a UK-based randomised, controlled, single-blind (study participant), multicentre, parallel group 48-week clinical study comparing biomarker-directed treatment adjustment with standard care in severe asthma., Results: Of 1572 treatment advisories (291 participants), instructions were followed in 1377 cases (87.6%). Patients were more likely to follow advice to remain on treatment (96.7%) than to either reduce (70.3%) or increase (67.1%) their treatment, with 64% of patients following all treatment advice. Multivariate analysis associated belonging to an ethnic minority group (OR 3.10, 95% CI 1.68-5.73) and prior study medication changes (two or more changes: OR 2.77, 95% CI 1.51-5.10) with failure to follow treatment advice. In contrast, emergency room attendance in the prior year (OR 0.54, 95% CI 0.32-0.92) was associated with following treatment advice. The largest effect was seen with transition onto or off oral corticosteroids (OR 29.28, 95% CI 16.07-53.36) when compared with those requested to maintain treatment. Centre was also an important determinant regarding the likelihood of patients to follow treatment advice., Conclusions: Belonging to an ethnic minority group and multiple prior treatment adjustments were associated with not following HCP treatment advice. Patients also responded differently to HCP advice across UK specialist centres. These findings have implications for the generalisability of models of care in severe asthma and require further focused studies., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest: J. Busby has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: J.G. Matthews has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: R. Chaudhuri reports grants, personal fees for advisory board work and nonfinancial support for meeting attendance from AstraZeneca, personal fees for advisory board work from GlaxoSmithKline and Novartis, personal fees for advisory board work and nonfinancial support for meeting attendance from Chiesi, nonfinancial support for meeting attendance from Napp Pharmaceuticals, outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: I.D. Pavord reports personal fees for lectures, advisory board honoraria, sponsorship to attend scientific meetings, and payments for organising educational events from AstraZeneca, personal fees for lectures, advisory board honoraria, and sponsorship to attend scientific meetings from Boehringer Ingelheim and GlaxoSmithKline, personal fees for lectures from Aerocrine and Chiesi, personal fees for lectures and advisory board honoraria from Almirall and Novartis, advisory board honoraria from Genentech, Regeneron, Sanofi, Circassia and Knopp, personal fees for lectures, payments for organising educational events, and sponsorship to attend scientific meetings from Teva, grants from the National Institute for Health Research, outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: T.C. Hardman has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: J.R. Arron has patents “Diagnosis and treatments relating to Th2 inhibition” (US 9,684,000 B2) and “Diagnosis and treatments relating to Th2 inhibition” (US 9,995,755 B2) issued with rights assigned to Genentech, a member of the Roche group, and is an employee of Genentech, Inc. and owns stocks/options in the Roche group. Conflict of interest: P. Bradding reports grants from Genentech, other (consultancy work on behalf of the University of Leicester) from Roche and Boehringer Ingelheim, outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: C.E. Brightling reports grants and personal fees from GlaxoSmithKline, AstraZeneca, Sanofi, Novartis, Chiesi, Genentech, Gossamer, Mologic and 4D Pharma, all paid to the institution and outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: D.F. Choy is an employee of Genentech, Inc. and owns stocks/options in the Roche group. Conflict of interest: D.C. Cowan has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: R. Djukanovic reports receiving fees for lectures at symposia organised by Novartis, AstraZeneca and Teva, consultation for Teva and Novartis as member of advisory boards, and participation in a scientific discussion about asthma organised by GlaxoSmithKline; he is a co-founder and current consultant, and has shares in Synairgen, a University of Southampton spin-out company. Conflict of interest: C.E. Hanratty has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: T.W. Harrison reports grants, personal fees and nonfinancial support from AstraZeneca, grants and personal fees from GlaxoSmithKline, personal fees from Vectura, Synairgen and Chiesi, outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: C.T. Holweg is an employee and stock owner of Genentech Inc., a member of the Roche Group, outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: P.H. Howarth reports employment by GlaxoSmithKline. Conflict of interest: S.J. Fowler reports personal fees for lectures and support to attend an international conference from AstraZeneca, grants and personal fees for lectures from Boehringer Ingelheim, personal fees for lectures, participation in an advisory board, and support to attend an national conference from Chiesi, personal fees for lectures from GlaxoSmithKline, Novartis and Teva, outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: J.L. Lordan has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: A.H. Mansur reports personal and institution payment for talks, advisory board meetings, sponsorship to attend conferences and education grants for service developments from GlaxoSmithKline, AstraZeneca, Novartis, Sanofi, Teva and others, outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: A. Menzies-Gow reports grants and personal fees from AstraZeneca, personal fees from Novartis, GlaxoSmithKline, Sanofi and Vectura, personal fees and nonfinancial support from Teva and Boehringer Ingelheim, outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: R.M. Niven has received lecture fees, advisory board activity and been supported to attend international meetings/conferences in the last 5 years by the following companies: AstraZeneca, Boehringer, Boston Scientific, Chiesi, Napp, Novartis and Teva. None of these have any relevance to the manuscript; R.M. Niven owns no shares or stocks and is not personally or in any family way connected to any pharmaceutical companies. Conflict of interest: D.S. Robinson has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: S.M. Walker has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: A. Woodcock reports personal fees for lectures from GlaxoSmithKline, personal fees for lectures and consultancy from Novartis, personal fees for consultancy from Chiesi, other (chairing research projects) from Reacta Biotech, Axalbion and Medicines Evaluation Unit, outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: L.G. Heaney reports other (sponsorship for meeting attendance) from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chiesi, GlaxoSmithKline and Napp Pharmaceutical, personal fees for lectures and advisory board work from Novartis, Hoffman la Roche/Genentech Inc., Sanofi, GlaxoSmithKline, AstraZeneca, Teva, Theravance and Circassia, grants from Medimmune, Novartis UK, Roche/Genentech Inc., and GlaxoSmithKline, and is academic lead for the Medical Research Council Stratified Medicine UK Consortium in severe asthma, which involves industrial partnerships with Amgen, Genentech/Hoffman la Roche, AstraZeneca, Medimmune, GlaxoSmithKline, Aerocrine and Vitalograph, outside the submitted work., (Copyright ©The authors 2022.)

Phenotype-specific omic expression patterns in people with frailty could provide invaluable insight into the underlying multi-systemic pathological processes and targets for intervention. Classical approaches to frailty have not considered the potential for different frailty phenotypes. We characterized associations between frailty (with/without disability) and sets of omic factors (genomic, proteomic, and metabolomic) plus markers measured in routine geriatric care. This study was a prevalent case control using stored biospecimens (urine, whole blood, cells, plasma, and serum) from 1522 individuals (identified as robust (R), pre-frail (P), or frail (F)] from the Toledo Study of Healthy Aging (R=178/P=184/F=109), 3 City Bordeaux (111/269/100), Aging Multidisciplinary Investigation (157/79/54) and InCHIANTI (106/98/77) cohorts. The analysis included over 35,000 omic and routine laboratory variables from robust and frail or pre-frail (with/without disability) individuals using a machine learning framework. We identified three protective biomarkers, vitamin D3 (OR: 0.81 [95% CI: 0.68-0.98]), lutein zeaxanthin (OR: 0.82 [95% CI: 0.70-0.97]), and miRNA125b-5p (OR: 0.73, [95% CI: 0.56-0.97]) and one risk biomarker, cardiac troponin T (OR: 1.25 [95% CI: 1.23-1.27]). Excluding individuals with a disability, one protective biomarker was identified, miR125b-5p (OR: 0.85, [95% CI: 0.81-0.88]). Three risks of frailty biomarkers were detected: pro-BNP (OR: 1.47 [95% CI: 1.27-1.7]), cardiac troponin T (OR: 1.29 [95% CI: 1.21-1.38]), and sRAGE (OR: 1.26 [95% CI: 1.01-1.57]). Three key frailty biomarkers demonstrated a statistical association with frailty (oxidative stress, vitamin D, and cardiovascular system) with relationship patterns differing depending on the presence or absence of a disability.

In a recent publication, Eleftheriou et al. proposed that inhibitors of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) are functional inhibitors of the main protease (M pro ) of SARS-CoV-2. Their predictions prompted the authors to suggest linagliptin, a DPP-4 inhibitor and approved anti-diabetes drug, as a repurposed drug candidate against the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic. We used an enzymatic assay measuring the inhibition of M pro catalytic activity in the presence of four different commercially available gliptins (linagliptin, sitagliptin, alogliptin and saxagliptin) and several structural analogues of linagliptin to study the binding of DPP-4 inhibitors to M pro and their functional activity. We show here that DPP-4 inhibitors like linagliptin, other gliptins and structural analogues are inactive against M pro ., (© 2020 The Authors. Published by Wiley-VCH GmbH.)

Background: Asthma treatment guidelines recommend increasing corticosteroid dose to control symptoms and reduce exacerbations. This approach is potentially flawed because symptomatic asthma can occur without corticosteroid responsive type-2 (T2)-driven eosinophilic inflammation, and inappropriately high-dose corticosteroid treatment might have little therapeutic benefit with increased risk of side-effects. We compared a biomarker strategy to adjust corticosteroid dose using a composite score of T2 biomarkers (fractional exhaled nitric oxide [FENO], blood eosinophils, and serum periostin) with a standardised symptom-risk-based algorithm (control)., Methods: We did a single-blind, parallel group, randomised controlled trial in adults (18-80 years of age) with severe asthma (at treatment steps 4 and 5 of the Global Initiative for Asthma) and FENO of less than 45 parts per billion at 12 specialist severe asthma centres across England, Scotland, and Northern Ireland. Patients were randomly assigned (4:1) to either the biomarker strategy group or the control group by an online electronic case-report form, in blocks of ten, stratified by asthma control and use of rescue systemic steroids in the previous year. Patients were masked to study group allocation throughout the entirety of the study. Patients attended clinic every 8 weeks, with treatment adjustment following automated treatment-group-specific algorithms: those in the biomarker strategy group received a default advisory to maintain treatment and those in the control group had their treatment adjusted according to the steps indicated by the trial algorithm. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients with corticosteroid dose reduction at week 48, in the intention-to-treat (ITT) population. Secondary outcomes were inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) dose at the end of the study; cumulative dose of ICS during the study; proportion of patients on maintenance oral corticosteroids (OCS) at study end; rate of protocol-defined severe exacerbations per patient year; time to first severe exacerbation; number of hospital admissions for asthma; changes in lung function, Asthma Control Questionnaire-7 score, Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire score, and T2 biomarkers from baseline to week 48; and whether patients declined to progress to OCS. A secondary aim of our study was to establish the proportion of patients with severe asthma in whom T2 biomarkers remained low when corticosteroid therapy was decreased to a minimum ICS dose. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02717689 and has been completed., Findings: Patients were recruited from Jan 8, 2016, to July 12, 2018. Of 549 patients assessed, 301 patients were included in the ITT population and were randomly assigned to the biomarker strategy group (n=240) or to the control group (n=61). 28·4% of patients in the biomarker strategy group were on a lower corticosteroid dose at week 48 compared with 18·5% of patients in the control group (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1·71 [95% CI 0·80-3·63]; p=0·17). In the per-protocol (PP) population (n=121), a significantly greater proportion of patients were on a lower corticosteroid dose at week 48 in the biomarker strategy group (30·7% of patients) compared with the control group (5·0% of patients; aOR 11·48 [95% CI 1·35-97·83]; p=0·026). Patient choice to not follow treatment advice was the principle reason for loss to PP analysis. There was no difference in secondary outcomes between study groups and no loss of asthma control among patients in the biomarker strategy group who reduced their corticosteroid dose., Interpretation: Biomarker-based corticosteroid adjustment did not result in a greater proportion of patients reducing corticosteroid dose versus control. Understanding the reasons for patients not following treatment advice in both treatment strategies is an important area for future research. The prevalence of T2 biomarker-low severe asthma was low., Funding: This study was funded, in part, by the Medical Research Council UK., (Copyright © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY 4.0 license. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

The Association for Human Pharmacology in the Pharmaceutical Industry (AHPPI) annual meeting focused on impending change, innovation, and future challenges facing early phase drug development as we move into the second decade of the 21th century. The meeting opened with discussion around the technical revolution in pharmaceutical medicine over the 4 decades since the AHPPI was founded and how transformative technologies have accompanied the introduction of processes such as physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling. During the meeting examples were presented of how in terms of the development of new therapies, the classic phases of clinical drug development are becoming a thing of the past and the lines between the phases have begun to blur, particularly in the field of oncology. The contribution that monoclonal antibodies have made to medicine and the next chapter in their design and use was also discussed. A representative of the UK's Medicine and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency discussed the increasing numbers of requests to approve complex innovative design trials, how novel trial designs are impacting on the traditional linear "phase" approach to drug development and the common pitfalls associated with them. Guidance was provided from a regulator's viewpoint on what was meant by the term "novel design" and how to submit successful trial applications for such complex trials. In an Oxford-style debate, the audience discussed the motion that "there is no longer a need to include placebo subjects in early clinical trials." The keynote speaker focused on delivering change in complex environments such as the field of drug development. The afternoon session included presentations on the challenges associated with drug product design, the complexities within non-oral dosage forms and proposed new methods of formulations for drug delivery. Presentations were also given on advances in mechanistic and computational pharmacokinetic modeling and how they have proved to be valuable tools to rationalize and facilitate the process of drug development., Competing Interests: MA was employed by the company Parexel International. JB was employed by the company Covance. AC was employed by the company Celerion. AK was employed by the company Simbec-Orion Group. SM was employed by the company Quotient Sciences. UL and JT were employed by the company Richmond Pharmacology Ltd. SS was employed by the company Alwyn Consulting. SK was employed by the company Niche Science & Technology. TCH is the Managing Director of the company Niche Science & Technology. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2020 Khan, Albayaty, Bush, Cheriyan, Cromie, Koch, Hammond, Mair, Lorch, Stringer, Taubel and Hardman.)

Intratumoural heterogeneity of pulmonary adenocarcinoma challenges the accurate interpretation of programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) immunohistochemistry, which is the only validated predictive marker for successful anti-PD-1/PD-L1 immunotherapy. The aim of this study was to determine whether PD-L1 expression is related to adenocarcinoma histological differentiation in a retrospective analysis of tumour biopsies with intratumoural histological heterogeneity. Adenocarcinomas with high intratumoural heterogeneity were categorised as 'mixed adenocarcinomas'. PD-L1 expression was determined immunohistochemically using tumour proportion scores (TPS). In 'mixed adenocarcinomas' PD-L1 scores were assessed across tumour areas with specific histological patterns. Comparisons were performed between histologically distinct differentiated tumours and/or histological areas. Poorly differentiated adenocarcinomas, represented by predominantly solid or micropapillary histological patterns, showed significantly higher expression of PD-L1 than other subtypes (p<0.001). Differentiation of intra-adenocarcinoma components was inversely correlated with PD-L1 expression: there were more PD-L1 positive cells in poorly differentiated areas than less differentiated (p<0.001), or than well differentiated areas (p<0.001), and in less differentiated more than well differentiated areas (p=0.001). In conclusion, PD-L1 expression is associated with poorly differentiated morphology in adenocarcinomas with intratumoural histological heterogeneity. Consequently, a TPS approach may not account for the contribution of more aggressive tumour components with higher levels of PD-L1 expression in within the tumour. Performing spectral analyses of PD-L1 expression across tumours is likely to be more accurate., (Copyright © 2020 Royal College of Pathologists of Australasia. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: Type 2 diabetes, a highly prevalent chronic disease, is associated with increasing frailty and functional decline in older people. We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of a multimodal intervention on functional performance in frail and pre-frail participants aged ≥70 years with type 2 diabetes mellitus., Methods: The MID-Frail study was a cluster-randomized multicenter clinical trial conducted in 74 trial sites across seven European countries. The trial recruited 964 participants who were aged >70 years [mean age in intervention group, 78.4 (SD 5.6) years, 49.2% male and 77.6 (SD 5.29) years, 52.4% male in usual care group], with type diabetes mellitus and determined to be frail or pre-frail using Fried's frailty phenotype. Participants were allocated by trial site to follow either usual care (UCG) or intervention procedures (IG). Intervention group participants received a multimodal intervention composed of (i) an individualized and progressive resistance exercise programme for 16 weeks; (ii) a structured diabetes and nutritional educational programme over seven sessions; and (iii) Investigator-linked training to ensure optimal diabetes care. Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) scores were used to assess change in functional performance at 12 months between the groups. An analysis of the cost-effectiveness of the intervention was undertaken using the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). Secondary outcomes included mortality, hospitalization, institutionalization, quality of life, burden on caregivers, the frequency and severity of hypoglycaemia episodes, and the cost-effectiveness of the intervention., Results: After 12 months, IG participants had mean SPPB scores 0.85 points higher than those in the UCG (95% CI, 0.44 to 1.26, P < 0.0001). Dropouts were higher in frail participants and in the intervention group, but significant differences in SPPB between treatment groups remained consistent after sensitivity analysis. Estimates suggest a mean saving following intervention of 428.02 EUR (2016) per patient per year, with ICER analysis indicating a consistent benefit of the described health care intervention over usual care. No statistically significant differences between groups were detected in any of the other secondary outcomes., Conclusions: We have demonstrated that a 12 month structured multimodal intervention programme across several clinical settings in different European countries leads to a clinically relevant and cost-effective improvement in the functional status of older frail and pre-frail participants with type 2 diabetes mellitus., (© 2019 The Authors Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Society on Sarcopenia, Cachexia and Wasting Disorders.)

The Association for Human Pharmacology in the Pharmaceutical Industry (AHPPI) annual meeting focused on the changing face of early phase drug development and opened with a keynote speech concerning the revolution in pharmaceutical medicine over the last 30 years and the impact this has had on the way patients are treated. Examples were presented of how translational pharmaceutics is being used to tackle the high drug candidate failure rate and is improving productivity when moving drug candidates from the laboratory through to clinical proof of concept. The European Medicines Agency revised 2007 Risk Mitigation guideline on first in human (FIH) clinical trials was discussed. The focus of the revised guideline, which came into force in February 2018, is on risk mitigation and promotion of safety and will assist drug sponsors with the design and performance of early clinical studies. The use of integrated adaptive protocol designs in early clinical development was discussed in relation to the challenges involved when running early phase clinical trials in patients. The Health Regulatory Authority presented its strategies to ensure that following Brexit, the United Kingdom remains an attractive place to conduct Phase I clinical trials. The Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency confirmed that in the event of a "no deal" Brexit, it is well placed to implement and influence many provisions of the new EU CTR. The meeting provided an opportunity to discuss the changing regulatory environment and the opportunities and challenges facing the United Kingdom following Brexit with invited speakers from a range of disciplines including drug development, clinical trials and research organizations, government science policy and regulatory agencies.

The first formal conference of the EUropean Federation for Exploratory MEdicines Development (EUFEMED) held in London was the result of a collaborative effort of its founding associations: the Association for Applied Human Pharmacology (AGAH; Germany), the Association for Human Pharmacology in the Pharmaceutical Industry (AHPPI; UK), the Belgian Association of Phase-I Units (BAPU; Belgium), and Club Phase-I (France). The conference focused on innovation and risk management in early clinical drug development. Among other innovations, immunotherapy in oncology and inflammatory diseases were discussed as well as the importance of adaptive trial designs in early clinical drug development. Consideration was given to assessing and mitigating risk in early clinical drug development, and included a preconference workshop. Different measures to minimize risks in healthy volunteers and patients in first-in-human trials were discussed in addition to the importance of non-clinical data, the need for reliable biomarkers, improved communication on adverse events (AEs) and well-trained study sites with ready access to intensive care units and clinical specialists. The need for a European-wide system for prevention of over-volunteering was also discussed. The conference provided opportunity to discuss these developments and concerns and the changing regulatory environment with stakeholders from academia, industry, and regulatory agencies including the European Medicines Agency (EMA). Presentations given by invited speakers are published on http://www.eufemed.eu/london-conference-2017/.

Background: Patients with difficult-to-control asthma consume 50-60% of healthcare costs attributed to asthma and cost approximately five-times more than patients with mild stable disease. Recent evidence demonstrates that not all patients with asthma have a typical type 2 (T2)-driven eosinophilic inflammation. These asthmatics have been called 'T2-low asthma' and have a minimal response to corticosteroid therapy. Adjustment of corticosteroid treatment using sputum eosinophil counts from induced sputum has demonstrated reduced severe exacerbation rates and optimized corticosteroid dose. However, it has been challenging to move induced sputum into the clinical setting. There is therefore a need to examine novel algorithms to target appropriate levels of corticosteroid treatment in difficult asthma, particularly in T2-low asthmatics. This study examines whether a composite non-invasive biomarker algorithm predicts exacerbation risk in patients with asthma on high-dose inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) (± long-acting beta agonist) treatment, and evaluates the utility of this composite score to facilitate personalized biomarker-specific titration of corticosteroid therapy., Methods/design: Patients recruited to this pragmatic, multi-centre, single-blinded randomised controlled trial are randomly allocated into either a biomarker controlled treatment advisory algorithm or usual care group in a ratio of 4:1. The primary outcome measure is the proportion of patients with any reduction in ICS or oral corticosteroid dose from baseline to week 48. Secondary outcomes include the rate of protocol-defined severe exacerbations per patient per year, time to first severe exacerbation from randomisation, dose of inhaled steroid at the end of the study, cumulative dose of inhaled corticosteroid during the study, proportion of patients on oral corticosteroids at the end of the study, proportion of patients who decline to progress to oral corticosteroids despite composite biomarker score of 2, frequency of hospital admission for asthma, change in the 7-item Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ-7), Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ), forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1), exhaled nitric oxide, blood eosinophil count, and periostin levels from baseline to week 48. Blood will also be taken for whole blood gene expression; serum, plasma, and urine will be stored for validation of additional biomarkers., Discussion: Multi-centre trials present numerous logistical issues that have been addressed to ensure minimal bias and robustness of study conduct., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02717689 . Registered on 16 March 2016.

Objective: Inadvertently submitting a paper to a journal that is unlikely to publish it is a waste of resources and ultimately delays dissemination of one's research. A high proportion of manuscripts are rejected by their author's first-choice journal. The aim of the present work was to review guidance provided within the literature for journal selection that might minimize the chance of manuscript rejection. We also consider papers that encompass more than one main medical science and describe the selection process that we used with a paper that was published in Cardiovascular Endocrinology ., Methods: A database search (Embase, PubMed and Medworm) was performed for all articles published in the scientific literature providing guidance on journal selection. Articles were identified that either had journal selection as their principal topic or included journal selection as part of a broader discussion of publishing. The relative performance of four free-to-use, web-based applications that claim to provide guidance on journal selection was compared., Results: The searches identified 286 hits, of which 249 were in English. Of these papers, 16 discussed journal selection and a further 10 articles were identified from citations within the original 16 articles. Only one article described a comprehensive model for submission decision-making. Identification of appropriate candidate journals by various web-based applications was erratic, with the Jane database providing the most robust suggestions., Conclusion: Our work suggests that little attention has been focused in the scientific literature on the mechanisms that authors use to select a journal for their work. Nevertheless, scientists for the most part seem to have a good sense of where their papers are most likely to be accepted. Beyond ensuring that a manuscript fulfils all the target journal's requirements, the literature suggests that it is important to have an objective view of the scientific contribution or 'value' of your work.

Background: Diabetes, a highly prevalent, chronic disease, is associated with increasing frailty and functional decline in older people, with concomitant personal, social, and public health implications. We describe the rationale and methods of the multi-modal intervention in diabetes in frailty (MID-Frail) study., Methods/design: The MID-Frail study is an open, randomised, multicentre study, with random allocation by clusters (each trial site) to a usual care group or an intervention group. A total of 1,718 subjects will be randomised with each site enrolling on average 14 or 15 subjects. The primary objective of the study is to evaluate, in comparison with usual clinical practice, the effectiveness of a multi-modal intervention (specific clinical targets, education, diet, and resistance training exercise) in frail and pre-frail subjects aged ≥70 years with type 2 diabetes in terms of the difference in function 2 years post-randomisation. Difference in function will be measured by changes in a summary ordinal score on the short physical performance battery (SPPB) of at least one point. Secondary outcomes include daily activities, economic evaluation, and quality of life., Discussion: The MID-Frail study will provide evidence on the clinical, functional, social, and economic impact of a multi-modal approach in frail and pre-frail older people with type 2 diabetes., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01654341.

Purpose of Review: Lipid-lowering is an intervention that reduces atherosclerosis and its complications. Statins currently form the standard of care but are not able to reduce low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) adequately in all patients - particularly those with familial hypercholesterolaemia and those with statin intolerance., Recent Findings: Combination therapy with statins is well established and ezetimibe is often used as an additional LDL-C-lowering agent reducing LDL-C by 20%. However, its clinical efficacy still remains controversial. Newer, more potent methods of LDL-C reduction are in development. Both lomitapide, a microsomal transfer protein inhibitor (MTPI), and mipomersen, an antisense oligonucleotide (ASO), have been shown to improve LDL-C levels by 25-50% in patients with homozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia. In patients with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia or statin intolerance antibody-based inhibitors of preprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin 9 (PCSK9) produce reductions in LDL-C of 30-65%. Cholesterol ester transfer protein inhibitors (CETPIs) reduce LDL-C by 30-40% as well as raising levels of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) and may also have a role as additional LDL-C-reducing drugs., Summary: Surrogate outcome trials will be required with lomitapide or mipomersen to confirm their effects in homozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia and clinical endpoint trials will be needed for PCSK9 and CETPIs if these are to be used widely.

Introduction: Pro-protein [corrected] convertase subtilisin kexin (PCSK)-9 is a newly discovered protein involved in intracellular and extracellular regulation of low-density lipoprotein receptor (LDLR) expression. Autosomal dominant activating mutations in PCSK-9 cause familial hypercholesterolaemia whereas inactivating mutations in man reduce LDL cholesterol (LDL-C) and are associated with a decreased lifetime risk of cardiovascular events., Areas Covered: As PCSK-9 binds to the LDLR, a number of approaches involving small molecule or peptide inhibition of binding, antibody-mediated inactivation of binding and the use of antisense oligonucleotides are being investigated as therapeutic approaches to lower LDL-C in man. This article reviews the biochemistry and physiology of PCSK-9 and details the efforts made to design novel molecules with the ability to inhibit PCSK-9 activity. Work in animal models has confirmed that reducing PCSK-9 expression can reduce atherosclerosis in mice, rats and primates. Monoclonal antibodies such as REGN-727 and AMG-145 have been shown to reduce LDL-C in patients with familial hypercholesterolaemia already treated with statins or healthy normocholesterolaemic controls., Expert Opinion: PCSK-9 inhibition is a potentially interesting novel addition to the armamentarium of LDL-C reducing drugs. Its effects in reducing LDL-C will need to be confirmed to reduce CVD events in large-scale clinical trials.

Lipid lowering is established as a proven intervention to reduce atherosclerosis and its complications. Statins form the basis of care but are not able to treat all aspects of dyslipidaemia. Many novel therapeutic compounds are being developed. These include additional therapeutics for low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, for example, thyroid mimetics (thyroid receptor beta-agonists), antisense oligonucleotides or microsomal transfer protein inhibitors (MTPI); triglycerides, for example, novel peroxosimal proliferator activating receptors agonists, MTPIs, diacylglycerol acyl transferase-1 inhibitors and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), for example, mimetic peptides; HDL delipidation strategies and cholesterol ester transfer protein inhibitors and modulators of inflammation, for example, phospholipase inhibitors. Gene therapy for specific rare disorders, for example, lipoprotein lipase deficiency using alipogene tiparvovec is also in clinical trials. Lipid-lowering drugs are likely to prove a fast-developing area for novel treatments as possible synergies exist between new and established compounds for the treatment of atherosclerosis., (© 2012 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.)

There is a recognized need for new treatment options for type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Recovery of glucose from the glomerular filtrate represents an important mechanism in maintaining glucose homeostasis and represents a novel target for the management of T2DM. Recovery of glucose from the glomerular filtrate is executed principally by the type 2 sodium-glucose cotransporter (SGLT2). Inhibition of SGLT2 promotes glucose excretion and normalizes glycemia in animal models. First reports of specifically designed SGLT2 inhibitors began to appear in the second half of the 1990s. Several candidate SGLT2 inhibitors are currently under development, with four in the later stages of clinical testing. The safety profile of SGLT2 inhibitors is expected to be good, as their target is a highly specific membrane transporter expressed almost exclusively within the renal tubules. One safety concern is that of glycosuria, which could predispose patients to increased urinary tract infections. So far the reported safety profile of SGLT2 inhibitors in clinical studies appears to confirm that the class is well tolerated. Where SGLT2 inhibitors will fit in the current cascade of treatments for T2DM has yet to be established. The expected favorable safety profile and insulin-independent mechanism of action appear to support their use in combination with other antidiabetic drugs. Promotion of glucose excretion introduces the opportunity to clear calories (80-90 g [300-400 calories] of glucose per day) in patients that are generally overweight, and is expected to work synergistically with weight reduction programs. Experience will most likely lead to better understanding of which patients are likely to respond best to SGLT2 inhibitors, and under what circumstances.

The sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT2), located in the plasma membrane of cells lining the proximal tubule, facilitates the reabsorbtion of glucose in the kidney. Inhibition of SGLT2 has the potential to reduce blood glucose and represents an opportune target for managing blood glucose. By promoting the excretion of glucose, SGLT2 inhibitors are the first anti-diabetic treatment to target the removal rather than the metabolic redirection of glucose. Their mechanism of action is independent of that of endogenous insulin status and thus provides a means of managing plasma glucose irrespective of a patient's glycaemic status or treatments being used in combination. Several candidate SGLT2 inhibitors based on the core glucoside structure of phlorizin are currently being developed, of which, the metabolically more stable aromatic and heteroaromatic C-glucosides have demonstrated the most promising preclinical and clinical data. The inhibition of SGLT2 by messenger antisense technology is also being investigated. Current indications suggest that short-term benefits, in terms of HbA1(c) reductions, are modest and it remains to be seen whether encouraging exogenous glucose disposal will result in long term patient benefits in terms of returning metabolic balance or even weight loss. Indications are that clinical efficacy will be greater with molecules based on an O-glucoside structure. Concerns have been raised over the safety of these agents, particularly a possible predisposition to urinary tract infections, but these concerns have yet to be confirmed in clinical studies. Clinical development programs will need to establish those patients most likely to benefit from inhibition of SGLT2.

Background: The introduction of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) around 1996 markedly reduced mortality and morbidity from human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection. As life expectancy has improved, the chronic complications of HIV and HAART have become increasingly relevant., Scope: This article provides an overview of the HIV-associated lipodystrophy, its pathogenesis and its clinical consequences (based on a search strategy in PubMed including literature published to November 2007)., Findings: Lipodystrophy syndrome is characterized by abnormal fat distribution syndrome associated with metabolic disturbances and includes insulin resistance, deranged glucose and lipid metabolism. It is associated with increased risks of progression to type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease. Robust diagnostic criteria are required for lipodystrophy, and subsequent prospective cohort studies and randomized controlled trials are then required to determine the etiology and prognosis of lipodystrophy, and to evaluate therapeutic interventions for this consequence of HAART. Therapies to improve insulin resistance have been tried but they are frequently ineffective, and are limited by potential toxicity in this population. Hence, current management options for HIV associated lipodystrophy are limited and are mostly based on avoidance of risk factors and switching of antiretroviral drugs., Conclusion: As the '3 by 5 strategy' of providing HIV drugs to the developing world is implemented worldwide, the numbers of patients adhering to antiretroviral medicines is dramatically increasing. One must be aware that in reducing the burden of acute retroviral disease, the treatments proposed might lead to significant rates of metabolic complications and further exacerbation of the epidemic of diabetes and cardiovascular disease.

Background: Alterations in erythrocyte sodium-lithium countertransport (SLC) activity and its maximal velocity (Vmax) are associated with hypertension and hypertriglyceridemia. The presence of apolipoprotein (apo) E variants is associated with hypertriglyceridemia. This study investigated the relationship between apoE phenotype and SLC kinetics., Methods: Cardiovascular risk factors and SLC kinetics were measured in 171 subjects and 69 controls. Apolipoprotein E phenotypes were determined by Western blotting., Results: Patients were 51% male, aged 56+/-13 years, with a blood pressure (BP) of 134+/-22/81+/-11 mm Hg, total cholesterol of 6.71+/-1.57 (256+/-61 mg/dL); median triglycerides 1.65 mmol/L (146 mg/dL) (range, 0.31 to 9.85 mmol/L; 27 to 872 mg/dL) and high-density lipoprotein (HDL) 1.39+/-0.43 mmol/L (54+/-16.6 mg/dL); fasting glucose 4.91+/-0.61 mmol/L (88.5+/-11.0 mg/dL); median insulin 11.7 IU/L (range, 3.7 to 39.8 IU/L). Phenotype frequencies were E3/E3 56%, E2/E3 14%, E2/E2 1%, E3/E4 27%, and E4/E4 2%. The SLC activity, Vmax, and sodium affinity (Km) were not significantly different with respect to apoE phenotype in simple analysis by Kruskal Wallis test. However, in multiple regression analysis after exclusion of BP, a strong co-correlate of SLC activity, the presence of an apoE2 allele was associated reduced activity (beta = -0.061; P = .01) along with HDL:apoA1 ratio (beta = -0.170; P < .001), whereas for the kinetic parameter Vmax, associations were found with triglyceride (beta = 0.029; P = .04), HDL:apoA1 ratio (beta = -0.186; P = .03) and the presence of an apoE2 allele (beta = -0.089; P = .04)., Conclusions: These findings suggest that the apoE phenotype may modulate SLC activity and that the presence of an apoE2 allele phenotype is associated with lower SLC activity and Vmax.

Introduction: Erythrocyte sodium-lithium countertransporter (SLC) has traditionally been characterised as the sodium-stimulated lithium efflux from lithium-loaded erythrocytes. Concurrent activity of the sodium-potassium cotransporter (NKCC) can be expected to lead to imprecise estimates of the activity of the SLC. In the present study, we have characterised this methodological problem and have shown that it can be corrected with the inclusion of bumetanide in the physiological salt solution., Methods: Lithium efflux was studied in lithium-loaded erythrocytes from 35 healthy, normotensive subjects. Erythrocytes were divided into two identical samples (A and B) and lithium efflux characteristics in both samples studied simultaneously by incubating aliquots from each in 10 media of differing external sodium concentrations. Efflux media employed for A and B were the same except for 0.02 mM bumetanide in the media used in B., Results: Increased external sodium was associated with increasing lithium efflux both in the absence and presence of bumetanide; efflux rates were consistently lower in media containing bumetanide (P<.05 in all cases). As external sodium increased, bumetanide-sensitive lithium efflux decreased in a manner that correlated inversely with external sodium concentration (r=-.77, P<.01). A small, nonsignificant increase in SLC activity was observed between measurements made under control conditions (median [range] in mmol Li/l RBC h; 0.272 [0.098-0.491]) and those made in the presence of bumetanide (0.286 [0.135-0.650]; P=.064). Bumetanide did not influence maximal rate of turnover or the affinity constant for external sodium. In contrast, the ratio of these variables was lower when determined in the absence than in the presence of bumetanide (5.5 [1.5-14.6] vs. 6.9 [2.8-24.2], respectively; P<.05)., Discussion: This work shows that a component of lithium efflux mediated by the NKCC changes substantially with alterations in external sodium, resulting in a variable contribution of this second transport pathway to apparent SLC activity. To eliminate this variability, bumetanide should be included in all media when studying SLC, and the relationship to external sodium concentration determined.