1. Importance of continuous treatment with intravitreal aflibercept injections in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration—12-month post hoc analysis of the PERSEUS real-world evidence study
- Author
-
Peter Wiedemann, Joachim Wachtlin, Nicole Eter, Georgios Keramas, Christine Rech, Helmut G. Sachs, Carsten Framme, Zoran Hasanbasic, and Harald Schilling
- Subjects
medicine.medical_specialty ,Visual acuity ,Recombinant Fusion Proteins ,Angiogenesis Inhibitors ,Cohort Studies ,Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience ,Macular Degeneration ,Intravitreal injection ,Internal medicine ,Ranibizumab ,Post-hoc analysis ,medicine ,Humans ,Dosing ,Prospective Studies ,Aflibercept ,business.industry ,Diabetic retinopathy ,Macular degeneration ,medicine.disease ,Sensory Systems ,Ophthalmology ,Receptors, Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor ,Treatment Outcome ,Cohort ,Intravitreal Injections ,Retinal Disorders ,Female ,medicine.symptom ,Intravitreal aflibercept ,business ,Tomography, Optical Coherence ,Cohort study ,medicine.drug ,Neovascular age-related macular degeneration - Abstract
Purpose To investigate the influence of treatment regularity with intravitreal aflibercept injections (IVT-AFL injections) on visual acuity (VA) outcomes in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) enrolled in the PERSEUS trial who received at least 7 IVT-AFL injections during the first year. Methods This was a post hoc analysis of the PERSEUS trial, a prospective, non-interventional, multicenter cohort study, and included 370 patients with nAMD who had received ≥ 7 IVT-AFL injections during year 1. In addition to the prespecified subgroups of treatment-naïve and previously treated patients, results were compared between patients with regular (n = 209) and irregular (n = 161) treatment. Regular treatment was defined as initial dosing with monthly IVT-AFL injections for 3 months, then bimonthly IVT-AFL injections until month 12. Irregular treatment was defined as any deviation from regular treatment (provided ≥ 7 injections were received). The outcome of primary interest was the mean change in VA from baseline after 12 months. Further outcomes of interest included VA gain or loss, proportion of patients achieving reading vision, and percentage of patients with fluid. Results At month 12, the mean (± standard deviation, SD) VA improvement from baseline was 6.1 ± 15.6 Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study letters in the regular cohort and 2.5 ± 16.7 letters in the irregular cohort with ≥ 7 IVT-AFL injections (P = 0.0514). Best results were obtained in the treatment-naïve regular sub-cohort with a mean ± SD VA improvement of 8.0 ± 17.7 letters, whereas treatment-naïve patients with irregular treatment experienced a considerably lower VA gain (2.8 ± 20.0 letters). Irregular treatment consistently correlated with inferior results in treatment-naïve patients. At month 12, the proportion of treatment-naïve patients who had experienced a worsening of ≥ 5 letters was 29.6% in the irregular sub-cohort versus 13.6% in the regular sub-cohort (P = 0.0049). However, among the treatment-naïve patients, the mean number of injections was significantly higher in the irregular than in the regular sub-cohort (8.0 ± 1.2 vs. 7.4 ± 0.6; P = 0.0001). Furthermore, compared with the treatment-naïve, regular sub-cohort, patients in the irregular sub-cohort had more visits (19.1 ± 8.6 vs. 16.1 ± 5.7), VA tests (14.2 ± 6.9 vs. 12.0 ± 4.6), and optical coherence tomography examinations (5.1 ± 3.7 vs. 3.4.0 ± 3.0). Conclusions Although irregularly treated patients received more injections and more monitoring visits during the first year of IVT-AFL treatment, they experienced worse VA outcomes than regularly treated patients.
- Published
- 2020