Search

Introduction: Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is a treatment option for spine metastases. The International Spine Radiosurgery Consortium (ISRC) has published consensus guidelines for target delineation in spine SBRT. A new software called Elements™ Spine SRS by Brainlab® that includes the module Elements SmartBrush Spine (v3.0, Munich, Germany) has been developed specifically for SBRT treatment of spine metastases, and the latter provides the ability to perform semiautomatic clinical target volume (CTV) generation based on gross tumor volume (GTV) localization and guidelines. The aims of our study were to evaluate this software by studying differences in volumes between semiautomatic CTV contours compared to manual contouring performed by an expert radiation oncologist and to determine the dosimetric impact of these differences on treatment plans. Methods: A total of 35 volumes ("Expert GTV" and "Expert CTV") from 30 patients were defined by a single expert. A semiautomatic definition of these 35 CTVs based on the location of "Expert GTV" and following ISRC guidelines was also performed in Elements SmartBrush Spine ("Brainlab CTV"). The spatial overlap between "Brainlab" and "Expert" CTVs was calculated using the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC). We considered a threshold of 0.80 or above to indicate that Elements SmartBrush Spine performed very well with adequate contours for clinical use. Two dosimetric treatment plans, each corresponding to a specific planning target volume (PTV; Expert PTV, Brainlab PTV), were created for 11 patients. Results: We showed that "Brainlab CTV" and "Expert CTV" mean volumes were 29.8 ± 16.1 and 28.7 ± 15.7 cm3, respectively (p = 0.23). We also showed that the mean DSC for semiautomatic contouring relative to expert manual contouring was 0.85 ± 0.08 and less than 0.80 in five cases. For metastases involving the vertebral body only (n = 13,37%), the mean DSC was 0.90 ± 0.03, and for ones involving other or several vertebral regions (n = 22.63%), the mean DSC was 0.81 ± 0.08 (p < 0.001). The comparison of dosimetric treatment plans was performed for equivalent PTV coverage. There were no differences between doses received by organs at risk (spinal cord and esophagus) for Expert and Brainlab PTVs, respectively. Conclusion: The results showed that the semiautomatic method had quite good accuracy and can be used in clinical routine even for complex lesions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Temozolomide (TMZ) is known to induce thrombocytopenia but no early predictive test has yet been clearly established. The aim of the study was to retrospectively identify and validate a threshold of early platelet variation predicting TMZ-induced thrombocytopenia during the TMZ phase in patients treated according to the Stupp protocol for glioblastoma.Methods: A training set was used to analyze variations in platelet count occurring from the first week (W1) to week 6 (W6) during radiotherapy. Our aim was to identify the most relevant platelet decrease associated with TMZ-induced thrombocytopenia ≤ 100 G/L at day 28 during the TMZ phase. The performance of the threshold was confirmed in an independent validation set.Results: Overall, 147 patients were included, 85 and 62 in the training and validation sets, respectively. Twenty-seven patients (18%) experienced at least one TMZ-induced thrombocytopenia in the TMZ phase. A platelet decrease at W6 ≥ 35% (∆W6 ≥ 35%) was identified as the best predictive variation with an AUC of 0.83, a sensitivity of 65%, and a specificity of 96%. In the validation set, ∆W6 ≥ 35% platelet variation was identified as an independent marker of TMZ-induced thrombocytopenia during the TMZ phase (OR 15.23 (95% CI 3.5-107.5)) corresponding to sensitivity of 77% (66-87%), specificity of 73% (62-84%), a positive predictive value of 42% (29-54%), and a negative predictive value of 92% (86-99%).Conclusion: Platelet decrease at W6 ≥ 35% during the RT-TMZ phase is an early and simple predictive marker of clinically relevant TMZ-induced thrombocytopenia during TMZ maintenance. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is a treatment option for spine metastases. The International Spine Radiosurgery Consortium (ISRC) has published consensus guidelines for target delineation in spine SBRT. A new software called Elements™ Spine SRS by Brainlab ® that includes the module Elements SmartBrush Spine (v3.0, Munich, Germany) has been developed specifically for SBRT treatment of spine metastases, and the latter provides the ability to perform semiautomatic clinical target volume (CTV) generation based on gross tumor volume (GTV) localization and guidelines. The aims of our study were to evaluate this software by studying differences in volumes between semiautomatic CTV contours compared to manual contouring performed by an expert radiation oncologist and to determine the dosimetric impact of these differences on treatment plans., Methods: A total of 35 volumes ("Expert GTV" and "Expert CTV") from 30 patients were defined by a single expert. A semiautomatic definition of these 35 CTVs based on the location of "Expert GTV" and following ISRC guidelines was also performed in Elements SmartBrush Spine ("Brainlab CTV"). The spatial overlap between "Brainlab" and "Expert" CTVs was calculated using the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC). We considered a threshold of 0.80 or above to indicate that Elements SmartBrush Spine performed very well with adequate contours for clinical use. Two dosimetric treatment plans, each corresponding to a specific planning target volume (PTV; Expert PTV, Brainlab PTV), were created for 11 patients., Results: We showed that "Brainlab CTV" and "Expert CTV" mean volumes were 29.8 ± 16.1 and 28.7 ± 15.7 cm 3 , respectively (p = 0.23). We also showed that the mean DSC for semiautomatic contouring relative to expert manual contouring was 0.85 ± 0.08 and less than 0.80 in five cases. For metastases involving the vertebral body only (n = 13,37%), the mean DSC was 0.90 ± 0.03, and for ones involving other or several vertebral regions (n = 22.63%), the mean DSC was 0.81 ± 0.08 (p < 0.001). The comparison of dosimetric treatment plans was performed for equivalent PTV coverage. There were no differences between doses received by organs at risk (spinal cord and esophagus) for Expert and Brainlab PTVs, respectively., Conclusion: The results showed that the semiautomatic method had quite good accuracy and can be used in clinical routine even for complex lesions., Competing Interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2022 Rogé, Henni, Neggaz, Mallet, Hanzen, Dubray, Colard, Gensanne and Thureau.)