Search

Agriculture can be a contributor of pollutants, including pesticides and excess sediment, to aquatic environments. However, side-inlet vegetated filter strips (VFSs), which are planted around the upstream side of culverts draining agricultural fields, may provide reductions in pesticide and sediment losses from agricultural fields, and have the additional benefit of removing less land from production than traditional VFS. In this study, reductions of runoff, the soluble pesticide acetochlor, and total suspended solids were estimated using a paired watershed field study and coupled PRZM/VFSMOD modeling for two treatment watersheds with source to buffer area ratios (SBAR) of 80:1 (SI-A) and 481:1 (SI-B). Based on the paired watershed ANCOVA analysis, runoff and acetochlor load reductions were significant following the implementation of a VFS at SIA but not SI-B, indicating the potential for side-inlet VFS to reduce runoff and acetochlor load from a watershed with an area ratio of 80:1 but not a higher ratio of 481:1. VFSMOD simulations were consistent with the results of the paired watershed monitoring study, where simulated reductions of runoff, acetochlor loads, and TSS loads were substantially lower for SI-B than SI-A. VFSMOD simulations of SI-B with the SBAR ratio observed at SI-A (80:1) also show that VFSMOD can be used to capture variability in effectiveness of VFS based on multiple factors including SBAR. While this study focused on the effectiveness of side-inlet VFSs at the field scale, broader adoption of properly sized side-inlet VFSs could improve surface water quality at the watershed or larger scales. Additionally, modeling at the watershed scale could aid in locating, sizing, and assessing the impacts of side-inlet VFSs at this larger scale., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: Meghan Arpino, John Hanzas, Jody Stryker, Michael Winchell, Don Meals reports financial support was provided by Acetochlor Registration Partnership, which consists of Bayer US Crop Science Division and Corteva Agriscience., (Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

A surface drinking water monitoring program for four corn (Zea mays L.) herbicides was conducted during 1995-2001. Stratified random sampling was used to select 175 community water systems (CWSs) within a 12-state area, with an emphasis on the most vulnerable sites, based on corn intensity and watershed size. Finished drinking water was monitored at all sites, and raw water was monitored at many sites using activated carbon, which was shown capable of removing herbicides and their degradates from drinking water. Samples were collected biweekly from mid-March through the end of August, and twice during the off-season. The analytical method had a detection limit of 0.05 microg L(-1) for alachlor [2-chloro-N-(2,6-diethylphenyl)-N-(methoxymethyl)-acetamide] and 0.03 microg L(-1) for acetochlor [2-chloro-N-(ethoxymethyl)-N-(2-ethyl-6-methylphenyl)-acetamide], atrazine [6-chloro-N-ethyl-N'-(1-methylethyl)-1,3,5-triazine-2,4-diamine], and metolachlor [2-chloro-N-(2-ethyl-6-methylphenyl)-N-(2-methoxy-1-methylethyl)-acetamide]. Of the 16528 drinking water samples analyzed, acetochlor, alachlor, atrazine, and metolachlor were detected in 19, 7, 87, and 53% of the samples, respectively. During 1999-2001, samples were also analyzed for the presence of six major degradates of the chloroacetanilide herbicides, which were detected more frequently than their parent compounds, despite having higher detection limits of 0.1 to 0.2 microg L(-1). Overall detection frequencies were correlated with product use and environmental fate characteristics. Reservoirs were particularly vulnerable to atrazine, which exceeded its 3 microg L(-1) maximum contaminant level at 25 such sites during 1995-1999. Acetochlor annualized mean concentrations (AMCs) did not exceed its mitigation trigger (2 microg L(-1)) at any site, and comparisons of observed levels with standard measures of human and ecological hazards indicate that it poses no significant risk to human health or the environment.