Search

The Mr F study investigates the pathogenesis of low trauma distal forearm fractures in men and includes volumetric bone mineral density (vBMD) measurements at the ultradistal forearm as there are no current data. A standard 64 slice CT scanner was used to determine if it was possible to adapt the existing Mindways quantitative computed tomography Pro software for measuring vBMD values at the hip and spine sites. For calculation of intra- and interobserver reliability 40 forearm scans out of the 300 available were chosen randomly. The images were analyzed using the Slice Pick module and Bone Investigational Toolkit. The 4% length of the radius was chosen by measuring the length of the radius from the scaphoid fossa distally to the radial head. The acquired image then underwent extraction, isolation, rotation, and selection of region of interest in order to generate a report on vBMD. A cross-sectional image was created to allow the generation of data on the cortical and trabecular components separately. Repeat analyses were undertaken by 3 independent observers who were blinded as to whether the image was from a participant with or without fracture. The images were presented in random order at each time point. The following parameters were recorded: cortical cross sectional area, total vBMD, trabecular vBMD, and cortical vBMD (CvBMD). Data were analyzed by calculating intraclass correlation coefficients for intra- and interobserver reliability. The lowest values occurred at the CvBMD with intraobserver reliability of 0.92 (95% confidence interval [CI] of 0.86-0.96) and interobserver reliability of 0.92 (95% CI 0.89-0.96). All other parameters had reliability values between 0.97 and 0.99 with tighter 95% CI than for CvBMD. The method of adapting the Mindways Pro software using a standard CT to produce vBMD and structural data at the ultradistal radius is reliable., (Copyright © 2019 The International Society for Clinical Densitometry. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

There is a concern that bisphosphonates may impair fracture healing because of their inhibitory effects on bone turnover. Here we evaluated the effects of early bisphosphonate therapy on fracture healing and functional outcome following a fracture of the distal radius. The fracture and bisphosphonates (FAB) trial was a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial involving 15 trauma centers in the United Kingdom. We enrolled 421 bisphosphonate-naive patients aged ≥50 years with a radiographically confirmed fracture of the distal radius and randomized them in a 1:1 ratio to receive alendronic acid 70 mg once weekly (n = 215) or placebo (n = 206) within 14 days of the fracture. The primary outcome measure was the proportion of fractures that had radiologically united at 4 weeks as assessed by an observer, blinded to treatment allocation. Secondary outcomes included the Disabilities of the Arm Shoulder and Hand (DASH) questionnaire, range of wrist movement and grip strength, pain and analgesia requirements, and the rate of malunion. The mean ± SD age of participants was 63 ± 8.5 years and 362 (86%) were female. At 4 weeks, 48 of 202 (23.8%) fractures had united in the alendronic acid group compared with 52 of 187 (27.8%) in the placebo group (observed absolute proportion difference 4.0%; 95% CI, -4.7% to 12.8%; p = 0.36). The absolute proportion difference between groups based on imputed data was 4.5% (95% CI, -4.7% to 13.8%; p = 0.30). There was no significant difference in the proportion of fractures that had united at any other time point and no differences in the DASH score, pain at the fracture site, grip strength, or any other clinical outcome. We conclude that among patients aged 50 years and above with a distal radius fracture, early administration of alendronic acid does not adversely affect fracture union or clinical outcome. These findings suggest bisphosphonate therapy can be safely commenced early after fracture if clinically indicated. © 2019 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research., (© 2019 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.)

The pathogenesis of low trauma wrist fractures in men is not fully understood. This study found that these men have lower bone mineral density at the forearm itself, as well as the hip and spine, and has shown that forearm bone mineral density is the best predictor of wrist fracture., Introduction: Men with distal forearm fractures have reduced bone density at the lumbar spine and hip sites, an increased risk of osteoporosis and a higher incidence of further fractures. The aim of this case-control study was to investigate whether or not there is a regional loss of bone mineral density (BMD) at the forearm between men with and without distal forearm fractures., Methods: Sixty-one men with low trauma distal forearm fracture and 59 age-matched bone healthy control subjects were recruited. All subjects underwent a DXA scan of forearm, hip and spine, biochemical investigations, health questionnaires, SF-36v2 and Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX). The non-fractured arm was investigated in subjects with fracture and both forearms in control subjects., Results: BMD was significantly lower at the ultradistal forearm in men with fracture compared to control subjects, in both the dominant (mean (SD) 0.386 g/cm 2 (0.049) versus 0.436 g/cm 2 (0.054), p < 0.001) and non-dominant arm (mean (SD) 0.387 g/cm 2 (0.060) versus 0.432 g/cm 2 (0.061), p = 0.001). Fracture subjects also had a significantly lower BMD at hip and spine sites compared with control subjects. Logistic regression analysis showed that the best predictor of forearm fracture was ultradistal forearm BMD (OR = 0.871 (0.805-0.943), p = 0.001), with the likelihood of fracture decreasing by 12.9% for every 0.01 g/cm 2 increase in ultradistal forearm BMD., Conclusions: Men with low trauma distal forearm fracture have significantly lower regional BMD at the ultradistal forearm, which contributes to an increased forearm fracture risk. They also have generalised reduction in BMD, so that low trauma forearm fractures in men should be considered as indicator fractures for osteoporosis.

Background: Ultrasound provides evaluation of rotator cuff disease with accuracy comparable to that of magnetic resonance imaging. Fluid in the sheath of the long head of the biceps tendon (LHB), identified on ultrasound scan, has been associated with disease of the rotator cuff, LHB, and glenohumeral joint. Prior literature has compared ultrasound findings only with arthrography, and results have been conflicting. Arthroscopy remains the reference standard in assessing accuracy of imaging modalities. We present the first study investigating the significance of fluid in the LHB on ultrasound in predicting subsequent rotator cuff disease identified on arthroscopy., Methods: Records were reviewed of 175 patients undergoing ultrasound and subsequent arthroscopy under 1 shoulder surgeon. Experienced musculoskeletal radiologists and sonographers performed ultrasound. Ultrasound examination and operating records were collected and analyzed. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, correlation, and logistic regression modeling., Results: Highly significant correlation (P < .001; ρ = 0.354) was found between fluid in the LHB sheath and rotator cuff tears on arthroscopy. Statistically significant but weak correlation (P < .05; rho = 0.187) was found between fluid in the LHB sheath and both biceps tendon disease and glenohumeral joint disease. Fluid around the LHB was shown to increase the likelihood of having rotator cuff tear (odds ratio, 2.641; 95% confidence interval, 1.229-5.674) and biceps tendon disease (odds ratio, 2.698; 95% confidence interval, 1.216-5.987)., Conclusion: This is the first report identifying significant correlation between fluid in the LHB sheath identified on ultrasound and subsequent rotator cuff disease identified at arthroscopy. We recommend routine reporting of fluid in the LHB sheath as it is likely to improve the accuracy of detecting rotator cuff and biceps tendon diseases., (Copyright © 2016 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

This cohort study investigated the influence of psychological factors, including perception of illness, anxiety and depression on recovery and functional outcome after total knee replacement surgery. A total of 100 patients (55 male; 45 female) with a mean age of 71 (42 to 92) who underwent a primary total knee replacement for osteoarthritis were recruited into this study. In all 97 participants completed the six week and 87 the one year follow-up questionnaires. Pre-operatively patients completed the revised Illness Perception Questionnaire, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale and Recovery Locus of Control Scale. Function was assessed pre-operatively, at six weeks and one year using Oxford Knee Score (OKS) and the goniometer-measured range of movement (ROM). The results showed that pre-operative function had the biggest impact on post-operative outcome for ROM and OKS. In addition questionnaire variables and depression had an impact on the OKS at six weeks. Depression and anxiety were also associated with a higher (worse) knee score at one year but did not influence the ROM at either six weeks or one year. Recovery from total knee replacement can be difficult to predict. This study has identified psychological factors that play an important role in recovery from surgery and functional outcome. These should be taken into account when considering patients for total knee replacement.