Search

Objectives: Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae are common sexually transmitted infections (STIs). Untreated infection in pregnancy can result in adverse neonatal outcomes, including vertical transmission. Screening for these infections is not routine in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs)., Methods: The Maduo Study was a non-randomised cluster crossover trial in Botswana to provide preliminary data on the effect of antenatal C. trachomatis and N. gonorrhoeae screening and treatment on postdelivery prevalence and vertical transmission to infants. Pregnant women asymptomatic for STIs were enrolled at four clinics (seven clusters). The intervention arm received C. trachomatis and N. gonorrhoeae screening at first antenatal care, third trimester and postdelivery. The standard-of-care arm received postdelivery screening only. Infants of women with a positive test postdelivery in both arms were screened. A cluster-level analysis was performed to compare the risk of postdelivery infection between intervention and standard-of-care arms., Results: The study enrolled 500 women; 206 (82.1%) and 187 (75.1%) were retained in the intervention and standard-of-care arms, respectively and screened ≤12 weeks postdelivery. C. trachomatis prevalence in the intervention arm reduced from 22.7% at first antenatal care to 1.0% postdelivery. N. gonorrhoeae prevalence reduced from 1.2% at first antenatal care to 0% postdelivery. The risk of C. trachomatis and/or N. gonorrhoeae was lower in the intervention arm postdelivery (0.6%) compared with the standard-of-care arm (15.7%); adjusted risk difference: -14.7% (95% CI -23.0%, -6.4%). Among 26 infants born to women with either infection postdelivery, 10 (38.5%) tested positive ( C. trachomatis : 9; N. gonorrhoeae : 1)., Conclusions: Postdelivery prevalence of C. trachomatis was significantly lower among pregnant women in Botswana who received diagnostic antenatal screening. Among women with C. trachomatis and/or N. gonorrhoeae postdelivery, more than one-third transmitted the infection to their infants. This exploratory study suggests antenatal STI screening has the potential to reduce infection in newborns in similar LMIC settings., Trial Registration Number: NCT04955717., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Objective: To evaluate the impact of screening and treating asymptomatic pregnant women for Chlamydia (C.) trachomatis and Neisseria (N.) gonorrhoeae infections on the frequency of preterm birth or low birthweight infants in Botswana., Design: Non-randomised, cluster-controlled trial., Setting: Four antenatal care clinics in Gaborone, Botswana., Population: Pregnant women aged ≥15 years, attending a first antenatal care visit, ≤27 weeks of gestation and without urogenital symptoms were eligible., Methods: Participants in the intervention clinics received screening (GeneXpert®, Cepheid) during pregnancy and at the postnatal visit. Participants in the standard-of-care clinics received screening at the postnatal visit only. We used multivariable logistic regression and post-estimation predictive margins analysis. Post-hoc analysis was conducted among sub-samples stratified by parity., Main Outcome Measures: Preterm birth (<37 weeks of gestation) and low birthweight (<2500 g)., Results: After controlling for parity, hypertension, antenatal care visits and clinic site, the predicted prevalence of preterm birth or low birthweight was lower in the intervention arm (11%) compared with the standard-of-care arm (16%) (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.59; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.28-1.24). In post-hoc analysis, the intervention was more effective than the standard-of-care (aOR 0.20; 95% CI 0.07-0.64) among nulliparous participants., Conclusion: A C. trachomatis and N. gonorrhoeae infection screening and treatment intervention among asymptomatic pregnant women may have reduced preterm birth or low birthweight outcomes, but results were not statistically significant. Post-hoc analysis found that the intervention reduced adverse outcomes among nulliparous participants., (© 2024 The Authors. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Background: Partner notification and treatment for sexually transmitted infections are critical to prevent reinfection and reduce transmission. However, partner treatment rates are low globally. Expedited partner therapy (EPT), in which the patient delivers treatment directly to their partner, may result in more partners treated. We assessed partner notification and treatment outcomes among pregnant women in Gaborone, Botswana, including EPT intent, uptake, and effectiveness., Methods: The Maduo study was a cluster-controlled trial evaluating the effect of antenatal Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae infection screening in pregnant women. The intervention arm received screening at first antenatal care (ANC), third-trimester, and postnatal care visits. The standard-of-care arm received screening postnatally. Participants screening positive were given options for partner treatment: contact slips, in-clinic treatment, or EPT. Self-reported partner notification and treatment outcomes were assessed at test-of-cure visit., Results: Of 51 women who screened positive for C. trachomatis / N. gonorrhoeae at first ANC and returned for test of cure, 100% reported notifying their partner and 48 (94.1%) reported their partner received treatment. At third trimester 100% (n = 5), reported partners were treated. Before testing, EPT intent was lower than EPT uptake at all time points (first ANC: 17.9% vs. 80.4%; third-trimester: 57.1% vs. 71.4%; postnatal care: 0% vs. 80.0%). Partner treatment success was 100% among EPT users compared with 70% among nonusers ( P = 0.006)., Conclusions: Partner notification and treatment success was high in this population. Despite low pretest intent to use EPT, uptake was high and associated with greater partner treatment success. Our findings suggest that EPT may be a successful partner treatment strategy to pursue in low- and middle-income countries., Competing Interests: Conflict of Interest and Sources of Funding: The authors have no competing interests to disclose., (Copyright © 2024 American Sexually Transmitted Diseases Association. All rights reserved.)

Objective: Congenital birth defects affect 3 to 5% of pregnancies. Genetic counseling can help patients navigate the testing process and understand results. The study objective was to identify predictors and utility of genetic counseling at the time of pregnancy termination. Additionally, we aimed to see what proportion of patients would benefit from additional testing based on the results of the genetic testing., Study Design: This was a retrospective cohort review of all terminations performed for fetal anomalies by an academic center from July 2016 to May 2020. Indications were stratified by abnormal serum screening or types of abnormal ultrasound findings. Data were abstracted regarding uptake of genetic counseling and testing results. Abnormal results that warranted additional testing regarding recurrence risks were noted. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to identify predictors of receipt of genetic counseling and testing., Results: Of 387 patients, 57% ( n  = 220) received preprocedure genetic counseling and 43% ( n  = 167) did not. Among patients who received diagnostic testing, 62% ( n  = 194) had genetic counseling compared with 38% ( n  = 121) without counseling (adjusted odds ratio 2.46, 95% confidence interval [1.41-4.29], p  < 0.001). Among the entire cohort, 38% ( n  = 148) had suspected aneuploidy based on serum screening. Of these, 89% ( n  = 132/148) had definitive testing, 92% ( n  = 122/132) confirming the aneuploidy. Among the other 68% ( n  = 239) with structural anomalies, 76% ( n  = 183) had diagnostic testing with 29% ( n  = 53) yielding an abnormal result. Among those fetuses with structural anomalies, 36% ( n  = 19/53) of genetic diagnoses warranted additional parental testing because of risk of recurrence compared with only 2% ( n  = 2/122) of patients with abnormal serum screening results alone., Conclusion: Genetic counseling was associated with increased uptake of diagnostic testing, which yielded useful information and prompted additional testing. This is important for determining etiology and recurrence risk and should be offered to patients presenting for termination for fetal indications, as well as providing diagnostic closure for patients., Key Points: · Genetic counseling increases the uptake of diagnostic testing in patients with fetal anomalies.. · Patients with ultrasound anomalies received less diagnostic testing despite actionable results 36% of the time.. · Genetic testing is invaluable for recurrence risk counseling even if patients chose to terminate.., Competing Interests: None declared., (Thieme. All rights reserved.)

Background: Chlamydia trachomatis ( C. trachomatis ) and Neisseria gonorrhoeae ( N. gonorrhoeae ) are curable sexually transmitted infections (STIs) that cause adverse pregnancy and neonatal outcomes. Most countries, including Botswana, do not offer C. trachomatis or N. gonorrhoeae screening during antenatal care (ANC) and instead use a syndromic approach for management of STIs., Methods: The Maduo Study is a prospective, cluster-controlled trial in Botswana evaluating the impact of diagnostic screening for antenatal C. trachomatis and N. gonorrhoeae infections to prevent adverse neonatal outcomes. Using baseline data from the Maduo Study (March 2021-March 2022), we determined the prevalence of C. trachomatis and N. gonorrhoeae infection among asymptomatic pregnant women in Botswana and correlates of infection using multivariable logistic regression., Results: Of 251 women who underwent C. trachomatis and N. gonorrhoeae screening at first ANC visit, 55 (21.9%, 95%CI 17.0-27.5) tested positive for C. trachomatis , 1 (0.4%, 95%CI 0-2.2) for N. gonorrhoeae ; and 2 (0.8%, 95%CI 0-2.8) for dual C. trachomatis and N. gonorrhoeae infection. Older age was associated with lower odds (aOR 0.93; 95%CI 0.88-0.98; p = 0.011) while any alcohol use during pregnancy was associated with higher odds (aOR = 3.53; 95%CI 1.22-10.16; p = 0.020) of testing positive for C. trachomatis or N. gonorrhoeae ., Conclusions: A high frequency of C. trachomatis infections was detected among asymptomatic pregnant women in Botswana indicating that many antenatal STIs are missed by the syndromic management approach. Our results highlight the need for diagnostic C. trachomatis screening during ANC in Botswana and other low- and middle-income countries that rely solely on the syndromic approach for management of STIs.

Partner management of sexually transmitted infection (STIs) is essential to identify and treat new cases, prevent reinfection in the index case, interrupt chains of transmission, reduce STI-related morbidity, and target STI screening and treatment interventions. The responsibility for partner notification and treatment falls on the health care provider. Approaches to partner management include patient referral, provider referral, contractual referral, and expedited partner therapy (EPT), with EPT and enhanced partner referral outperforming other methods. This article provides an overview of clinical recommendations regarding partner management, with particular emphasis on EPT, and an update on new and emerging evidence in the field., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Competing Interests: Potential conflicts of interest. The authors: No reported conflicts of interest. All authors have submitted the ICMJE Form for Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest.

Background: Chlamydia trachomatis (CT) and Neisseria gonorrhoeae (NG) are extremely common sexually transmitted infections (STIs) that are associated with adverse birth and neonatal outcomes, and the risk of vertical transmission of CT and NG during delivery is high. The majority of CT and NG infections are asymptomatic and missed by the standard of care in most countries (treatment based on symptoms). Thus, it is likely that missed maternal CT and NG infections contribute to preventable adverse health outcomes among women and children globally. This study aims to assess the effectiveness of CT and NG testing for asymptomatic pregnant women to prevent adverse neonatal outcomes, understand the inflammatory response linking CT and NG infections to adverse neonatal outcomes, and conduct an economic analysis of the CT and NG testing intervention., Methods: The Maduo ("results" in Setswana) is a prospective, cluster-controlled trial in Gaborone, Botswana to compare a near point-of-care CT and NG testing and treatment intervention implemented in "study clinics" with standard antenatal care (World Health Organization-endorsed "syndromic management" strategy based on signs and symptoms without laboratory confirmation) implemented in "standard of care clinics" among asymptomatic pregnant women. The primary outcome is vertical transmission of CT/NG infection. Secondary outcomes include preterm birth (delivery < 37 completed weeks of gestation) and/or low birth weight (< 2500 g). The trial will also evaluate immunological and inflammatory markers of adverse neonatal outcomes, as well as the costs and cost-effectiveness of the intervention compared with standard care., Discussion: The Maduo study will improve our understanding of the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of CT and NG testing among asymptomatic pregnant women. It will also increase knowledge about the CT/NG-related immune responses that might drive adverse neonatal outcomes. Further, results from this study could encourage expansion of STI testing during antenatal care in low resource settings and improve maternal and neonatal health globally., Trial Registration: This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (Identifier NCT04955717, First posted: July 9, 2021))., (© 2022. The Author(s).)

Partner notification and treatment are essential to sexually transmitted infection (STI) management. However, in low- and middle-income countries, half of partners do not receive treatment. A mixed methods study was conducted to explore experiences and preferences around partner notification and treatment in patients seeking STI care in Gaborone, Botswana. Thirty participants were administered a quantitative survey, followed by a semi-structured interview on partner notification, treatment, and expedited partner therapy (EPT). Among the 30 participants, 77% were female with a median age of 28 years (IQR = 24-36), 87% notified their partner, and 45% of partners requiring treatment received treatment. Partners who received a contact slip were more likely to have been treated than those who did not (75% vs. 25%). Contact slips were identified as facilitators of notification and treatment, while asymptomatic partners and limited clinic resources were identified as barriers to treatment. Few participants expressed a preference for EPT and concerns included preference for medical supervision, a belief their partner would refuse, and an inability to explain the treatment. Despite successful notification, partner treatment was modest within this population. Information for partners, provider counseling, and improved access to services may increase partner treatment. Education on STIs and treatment options may improve EPT acceptability.

To disseminate lessons learned from the implementation experience of a public-private sector partnership, we describe a comprehensive HIV/AIDS program including 5-year survival outcomes for individuals who initiated antiretroviral therapy (ART) treatment in Togo from 2010 to 2015. A retrospective case study analysis was conducted from a cohort of patients receiving ART at an HIV/AIDS care clinic in Kara Region, Togo. Kaplan-Meier curves with Log rank tests were used to compare estimated survival curves by demographic and clinical characteristics. Associations were described between survival probability and age, gender, World Health Organization (WHO) disease stage, and timing of ART initiation. Cox proportional hazard model was used to determine predictors of mortality. After approximately five-years since ART initiation (1780 days), there were 114 deaths, with a survival probability of 75.3% (95% CI: 70.3-80.6%). Participants with advanced WHO disease stage were more likely at risk of death relative to patients categorized as WHO Stage 1, with Stage 4 approximately 9 times more likely (aHR 9.22, 95% CI 4.29-19.84). Our study suggests that delivering comprehensive HIV care through a private-public partnership may serve as a model to expand and improve HIV/AIDS care as well as high quality primary care.