Search

Background: Diabetes mellitus is associated with higher risk of target lesion failure (TLF) after percutaneous coronary intervention. We studied the 5-year outcome in patients with diabetes mellitus treated with biodegradable polymer stents. Methods: The SORT OUT VII was a randomised trial comparing the ultrathin sirolimus-eluting Orsiro stent (O-SES) and the biolimus-eluting Nobori stent (N-BES) in an all-comer setting. Patients (n = 2525) were randomised to receive O-SES (n = 1261, diabetes: n = 236) or N-BES (n = 1264, diabetes: n = 235). Endpoints were TLF (a composite of cardiac death, target-lesion myocardial infarction (MI), target lesion revascularization (TLR)), definite stent thrombosis and a patient related outcome (all-cause mortality, MI and revascularization) within 5 years. Results: Patients with diabetes mellitus had higher TLF (20.6% vs 11.0%, (Rate ratio (RR) 1.85 95% confidence interval (CI): (1.42-2.40) and patient related outcome (42.0% vs 31.0%, RR 1.43 95% CI: (1.19-1.71)) compared to patients without diabetes. Among patients with diabetes mellitus, TLF after 5 years did not differ between O-SES and N-BES (21.2% vs 20.0%), RR 1.05 95% CI: (0.70-1.58), p = 0.81). Cardiac death, MI, TLR, and definite stent thrombosis did not differ between the groups. Conclusion: In patients with diabetes mellitus, 5-year outcomes were similar among patients treated with biodegradable polymer O-SES or N-BES. Clinical trial registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01879358. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Bioresorbable scaffolds (BRS) have been proposed as an alternative to drug-eluting stents (DES), offering radial support during the early phases of healing, while potentially reducing the risk of long-term complications. A magnesium-based BRS (MgBRS) has shown promising results after implantation. However, there is a lack of knowledge regarding the long-term outcomes. Case summary A 62-year-old man with hypertension, dyslipidaemia, family history of ischaemic heart disease, and previous myocardial infarction, presented with non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI). Six years prior, he also had a NSTEMI and a mid-left anterior descending artery (LAD) lesion was treated with a 3.0/25 mm MgBRS. Post-implantation optical coherence tomography (OCT) revealed proximal edge dissection, and a second MgBRS 3.0/15 mm was implanted. Optical coherence tomography of the scaffold-treated segment was performed after 6 and 12 months with no sign of restenosis. The current angiogram showed a restenosis in the previously MgBRS-treated segment in LAD. Optical coherence tomography showed a plaque rupture in a thin cap fibro-atheroma and scaffold remnants. The lesion was pre-dilated and stented with a 3.0/20 mm DES and post-dilated with a 3.5 mm non-compliant balloon. Discussion Most cases of late scaffold failure showed acquired mal-apposition, which also can be related to the degrading process, or uncovered struts, none of which were seen in our case at 6 or 12 months. This case represents an insight into the vascular healing and potential mechanisms for failure of the MgBRS, with serial OCT recording at implantation, and after 6 months, 12 months, and 6 years. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

BACKGROUND: Bioresorbable scaffolds (BRS) were developed to overcome limitations related to late stent failures of drug-eluting stents, but lumen reductions over time after implantation of BRS have been reported. This study aimed to investigate if lesion preparation with a scoring balloon compared with a standard noncompliant balloon minimizes lumen reduction after implantation of a Magmaris BRS assessed with optical coherence tomography and intravascular ultrasound. METHODS: Eighty-two patients with stable angina were randomized in a ratio of 1:1 to lesion preparation with a scoring balloon versus a standard noncompliant balloon before implantation of a Magmaris BRS. The primary end point was minimal lumen area at 6-month follow-up. RESULTS: Following Magmaris BRS implantation, minimal lumen area (6.4±1.6 versus 6.3±1.5 mm2; P =0.65), mean scaffold area (7.8±1.5 versus 7.5±1.7 mm2; P =0.37), and mean lumen area (8.0±1.6 versus 7.7±2.1 mm2; P =0.41) did not differ significantly in patients with lesions prepared with scoring versus standard noncompliant balloon, respectively. Six-month angiographic follow-up with optical coherence tomography and intravascular ultrasound was available in 74 patients. The primary end point, 6-month minimal lumen area, was significantly larger in lesions prepared with a scoring balloon compared with a standard noncompliant balloon (4.7±1.4 versus 3.9±1.9 mm2; P =0.04), whereas mean lumen area (7.2±1.4 versus 6.8±2.2 mm2; P =0.35) did not differ significantly. Intravascular ultrasound findings showed no difference in mean vessel area at the lesion site from baseline to follow-up in the scoring balloon group (16.8±2.9 versus 17.0±3.6 mm2; P =0.62), whereas mean vessel area (17.1±4.4 versus 15.7±4.9 mm2; P <0.001) was smaller in lesions prepared with a standard noncompliant balloon due to negative remodeling. CONCLUSIONS: Lesion preparation with a scoring balloon before implantation of a Magmaris BRS resulted in a significantly larger minimal lumen area after 6 months due to less negative remodeling compared with lesion preparation with a standard noncompliant balloon. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT04666584. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]