Search

Background: The global incidence of persistent pain after surgery is approximately 10%, with considerable clinical and socioeconomic impacts. Despite identifying many risk factors in its development and the challenging management of the often neuropathic pain complaints, preoperative recognition of high-risk patients in various surgical populations using a standardized risk factor assessment questionnaire is lacking. This study evaluates the predictive value of a short holistic risk factor screening questionnaire as a first step in preventing and treating persistent pain in adults undergoing elective surgery.Methods: This prospective observational pragmatic trial will include 560 adults undergoing elective surgery. The primary endpoint is the evaluation of the predictive value of the screening questionnaire, including the optimal cut-off determination in terms of sensitivity and specificity for inclusion in a perioperative high-vigilance program. Secondary endpoints are postoperative pain (intensity and characterization using the NRS and DN4), postoperative analgesic usage, and well-being using the EQ-5D-5 L. To assess the performance of the designed screening questionnaire in the identification of psychosocial pain aspects, HADs, and STAI-trait are being surveyed. Additionally, the multidimensional pain inventory (MPI, part 1) is being used to assess the impact of pain on daily life in patients.Discussion: This pragmatic clinical trial will evaluate a short preoperative screening questionnaire to predict persistent postoperative pain after elective surgery in adults. Suppose high-risk patients could be identified earlier using this short preoperative holistic screening questionnaire. In that case, it might contribute to a more widespread implementation of standardized preoperative assessment and awareness for preventing persistent postoperative pain.Trial Registration: Local ethics committee: B3002022000112. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT05526976. Registered on: 02 September 2022. Start of recruitment: 22 December 2022.Trial Status: This paper is based on protocol version 4.0. The first patient was assigned to the research project on the 22 of December 2022. We anticipate including the last patient in October 2023 and plan to finalize the study by January 2024. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Pectus excavatum and pectus carinatum are the most common chest wall deformities. Although minimally invasive correction (minimally invasive repair of pectus, MIRP) has become common practice, it remains associated with severe postoperative pain. Preoperative psychosocial factors such as anxiety and low self-esteem can increase postsurgical pain. Early detection of psychological symptoms, effective biopsychosocial perioperative management of patients, and prevention of pain chronification using an enhanced recovery pathway (ERP) may improve outcomes. However, the incidence of the latter is poorly described in adolescents undergoing MIRP. Objective: The objective of our study was to evaluate the implementation of an ERP containing early recovery goals and to assess persistent postsurgical pain 3 months postoperatively in pediatric patients undergoing MIRP. The ERP consists of a Web-based platform containing psychological screening questionnaires and extensive telemonitoring for follow-up of patients at home. Methods: A population-based cohort study was conducted with prospectively collected data from patients undergoing pectus surgery between June 2017 and December 2017. An ERP was initiated preoperatively; it included patient education, electronic health-based psychological screening, multimodal pre-emptive analgesia, nausea prophylaxis as well as early Foley catheter removal and respiratory exercises. After hospital discharge, patients were followed up to 10 weeks using a Web-based diary evaluating pain and sleep quality, while their rehabilitation progress was monitored via Bluetooth-connected telemonitoring devices. Results: We enrolled 29 adolescents using the developed ERP. Pre-emptive multimodal analgesia pain rating scores were low at hospital admission. Optimal epidural placement, defined by T8-9 or T9-10, occurred in 90% (26/29) of the participants; thus, no motor block or Horner syndrome occurred. Mean bladder catheterization duration was 3.41 (SD 1.50) days in ERP patients. Numeric rating scale (NRS) scores for pain and the incidence of nausea were low, contributing to a fluent rehabilitation. Mean NRS scores were 2.58 (SD 1.77) on postoperative day (POD) 1, 2.48 (SD 1.66) on POD 2, and 3.14 (SD 1.98) on POD 3 in ERP-treated patients. Telemonitoring at home was feasible in adolescents after hospital discharge despite adherence difficulties. Although the pain scores at the final interview were low (0.81 [SD 1.33]), 33% (9/27) long-term follow-up ERP patients still experienced frequent disturbing thoracic pain, requiring analgesic administration, school absenteeism, and multiple doctor (re)visits. Conclusions: Allocating patients to the appropriate level of care preoperatively and immediately postoperatively may improve long-term outcome variables. Internet-based technologies and feasible, objective monitoring tools can help clinicians screen surgical patients for risk factors and initiate early treatment when indicated. Future research should focus on improving risk stratification and include a psychological assessment and evaluation of the effect of perioperative care pathways in children undergoing major surgery. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]