Search

Background An important aspect of achieving the provision of woman-centred maternity services is to seek women’s experiences of maternity care. Aim To explore women’s experiences of the care received within the Irish maternity system and to identify aspects of positive care and areas requiring improvement. Methods The Babies Born Better pan-European online survey asked open-ended questions on positive aspects of care and aspects of care that could be improved. Data from women who birthed in Ireland within the previous five years were included. Socio-demographic data were analysed descriptively, and descriptive content analysis was conducted for the qualitative comments. Findings Data from 736 participants were included. Four categories were generated from the analysis: Women’s interactions with healthcare professionals included five sub-categories of competence and expertise, continuity and consistency, respectful care, communication, and shared decision-making; Interventions and procedures included the five sub-categories of medical interventions, breastfeeding support, pain relief, birth partner’s presence and involvement, and facilitating mother and baby attachment; Organisational and infrastructural issues contained three sub-categories of facilities and services, environment and atmosphere, and staffing levels; and the fourth category, Overall evaluations and specific statements, showed the diversity of women’s experiences within the services. Conclusions Several positive aspects of care within the Irish maternity services were identified, many of which related to interpersonal factors and interactions with healthcare professionals. The findings also revealed what could be changed, some of which would require minimal resources or effort, so that women would experience positive care.

Background An important aspect of achieving the provision of woman-centred maternity services is to seek women’s experiences of maternity care. Aim To explore women’s experiences of the care received within the Irish maternity system and to identify aspects of positive care and areas requiring improvement. Methods The Babies Born Better pan-European online survey asked open-ended questions on positive aspects of care and aspects of care that could be improved. Data from women who birthed in Ireland within the previous five years were included. Socio-demographic data were analysed descriptively, and descriptive content analysis was conducted for the qualitative comments. Findings Data from 736 participants were included. Four categories were generated from the analysis: Women’s interactions with healthcare professionals included five sub-categories of competence and expertise, continuity and consistency, respectful care, communication, and shared decision-making; Interventions and procedures included the five sub-categories of medical interventions, breastfeeding support, pain relief, birth partner’s presence and involvement, and facilitating mother and baby attachment; Organisational and infrastructural issues contained three sub-categories of facilities and services, environment and atmosphere, and staffing levels; and the fourth category, Overall evaluations and specific statements, showed the diversity of women’s experiences within the services. Conclusions Several positive aspects of care within the Irish maternity services were identified, many of which related to interpersonal factors and interactions with healthcare professionals. The findings also revealed what could be changed, some of which would require minimal resources or effort, so that women would experience positive care.

Background: Family members, or others, often assume the role of informal (unpaid) carers of people with chronic illnesses. Care-giving, however, can impact profoundly on the quality of life of carers and can cause carer worry, stress and guilt. Implementing interventions that positively affect the lives of carers is important; however, carers as a group are often difficult to reach. We embedded a study within a pilot-feasibility trial of a mindfulness based intervention to determine and prioritise the key motivators and challenges influencing informal carers’ decisions for participating in a trial. Methods: We used a multi-method approach involving interviews with participants from a ‘host trial’ and data from systematic reviews to develop a survey that was distributed to informal carers in Ireland. The survey consisted of 28 motivator and 17 challenge statements. Participants rated how important they thought each statement was when deciding to take part in a trial on a 5-point Likert Scale. Mean scores and standard deviations were calculated for each statement and arranged in descending order to provide the priority lists. Results: Thirty-six carers responded to the survey. Helping to create awareness about carers was the top ranked motivator, followed by four study design statements related to the time at which the study occurs, the study location, format of delivery and venue. The least important motivator related to how carers were invited to take part a study. Difficulties in planning due to the caring role emerged as the most important challenge, followed by being unable to leave the care recipient on his/her own. Conclusions: Insight into decision-making for research participation will assist trial developers tailor trial processes for informal carer populations. We recommend that trialists should consider these motivators and challenges when designing future trials involving informal carers so as to enhance trial feasibility and success.