Search

Iron deficiency is the most common nutrient deficiency in the world, affecting over 20% of premenopausal women worldwide. Oral iron supplementation is often the first-line treatment for the acute and chronic management of iron deficiency due to its ease and accessibility. However, there is no consensus on the optimal formulation or dosing strategy, or which patients should be preferentially treated with intravenous iron. Management of iron deficiency is complicated by the hepcidin-ferroportin iron regulatory pathway, which has evolved to prevent iron overload and thereby creates an inherent limit on gastrointestinal iron uptake and efficacy of oral iron. Unabsorbed iron propagates many of the side effects that complicate oral iron use including dyspepsia and constipation, all of which can thus be exacerbated by excessive oral iron doses. Daily low dose and every other day dosing protocols have attempted to bypass this physiologic bottleneck to allow for effective absorption and limit side effects; however, this approach has still resulted in low fractional iron absorption. In the following manuscript, we review the pathophysiology of iron absorption and current evidence for various preparations of oral iron. Lastly, we highlight opportunities for further study to advance the care of individuals affected by iron deficiency.

Hepatic cirrhosis leads to numerous hematologic derangements resulting in a complex and tenuously rebalanced hemostatic milieu. The utility of common hematologic tests including the INR and aPTT in assessing hemostatic and thrombotic risk in patients with cirrhosis is limited, and consensus on transfusion thresholds and proper management of thrombotic complications continues to evolve. This review summarizes the pathophysiology of key derangements of hemostasis including those of platelets, von Willebrand factor, pro- and anticoagulation factors, and fibrin. Additionally, the pathogenesis, consequences, optimal management, and prevention of major thrombotic and bleeding complications in cirrhosis arte discussed.

With rapid advancements in diagnosis and treatment of malignancies, the gap between generalists and subspecialists continues to widen, particularly in cancers like lymphoma where the spectrum of disease varies from indolent to rapidly progressive. Prior to establishing with a hematologist/oncologist, patients must be accurately and comprehensively diagnosed and managed for lymphoma in the generalist setting. In the following manuscript, we review the common clinical presentations in which should raise concern for lymphoma. We summarize the literature regarding the role of laboratory studies including complete blood count and peripheral blood flow cytometry, the recommendations for lymph node sampling, the role and selection of imaging modalities, and ideal patient monitoring for high-risk clinical syndromes that may be encountered in lymphoma.

Mutations in isocitrate dehydrogenase genes (IDH1 and IDH2) are common in acute myeloid leukemia (AML), occurring in up to 30% of AML cases. Mutations in IDH leads to abnormal epigenetic regulation in AML cells and blocks differentiation. Inhibitors of mutated IDH1 and IDH2, ivosidenib and enasidenib, respectively, were recently approved by the FDA for relapsed/refractory AML; ivosidenib is also approved for newly diagnosed AML patients not fit for standard chemotherapy. Here, we discuss the clinical development of IDH inhibitors, their unique side effects, and outline future combination approaches in AML. IDH inhibitors are well-tolerated but can induce differentiation of AML cells, which leads to the on-target side effect of differentiation syndrome in up to 20% of patients. Although IDH inhibitors demonstrate efficacy as monotherapy, recent trials have shown that they have higher response rates in combination with hypomethylating agents (HMAs). Current trials of IDH inhibitors include combination with standard induction chemotherapy, as maintenance therapy, and in combination with venetoclax-based regimens. IDH inhibitors are active and have a favorable toxicity profile in AML therapy. Current clinical trials are evaluating how to best incorporate IDH inhibitors into combination therapy to optimize outcomes and duration of response for AML patients with IDH mutations.

Iron deficiency anemia (IDA) and heavy menstrual bleeding are prevalent, interrelated issues impacting over 300 million premenopausal women worldwide. IDA is generally associated with increased platelet counts; however, the effects of IDA and its correction on platelet function in premenopausal women remain unknown.We sought to determine how IDA and intravenous iron affect platelet count and platelet function in premenopausal women.Hematologic indices were assessed in a multicenter, retrospective cohort of 231 women repleted with intravenous iron. Pre- and postinfusion blood samples were then obtained from a prospective cohort of 13 women to analyze the effect of intravenous iron on hematologic parameters as well as platelet function with flow cytometry and platelet aggregation assays under physiologic shear.Following iron replacement, anemia improved, and mean platelet counts decreased by 26.5 and 16.0 K/mmWe find that intravenous iron improves anemia while restoring platelet counts and platelet secretory responses in premenopausal women with iron deficiency. Our results suggest that iron deficiency as well as iron replacement can have a range of effects on platelet production and function. Consequently, platelet reactivity profiles should be further examined in women and other groups with IDA where replacement offers a promising means to improve anemia as well as quality of life.

Background: Iron deficiency, heavy menstrual bleeding, and anemia are interrelated conditions with high prevalence in women's health. Together, they impact an estimated 310 million premenopausal women worldwide. Iron deficiency has been associated with development of anemia as well as thrombocytosis. However, the effects of iron deficiency on platelet function remain unknown. Objective: We set out to investigate the impact of IV iron repletion on platelet function, platelet count, and other blood cell indices in iron deficient premenopausal women. Methods: We conducted a prospective single-center study of iron deficient premenopausal women who underwent iron repletion with a single dose of 1000 mg of low molecular weight iron. Pre-infusion and post-infusion blood samples were obtained for laboratory analysis. Standard of care monitoring of iron indices and complete blood counts were also included in the analysis. Pre-infusion rates of anemia and thrombocytosis were calculated using minimum hemoglobin and peak platelet count in the 6 months preceding iron infusion. Platelet function was quantified by Fluorescence-Activated Cell Sorting (FACS) quantification of platelet activation marker antibodies for GPIIb/IIIa (PAC1) and P-selectin (CD62P) after exposure to multiple platelet agonists. Platelet aggregation was assessed by flow of anticoagulated whole blood at a shear rate of 300 s -1 for 5 minutes through chambers coated with type I collagen, imaged with differential interference contrast optics, and quantitatively represented through computation of percent total surface coverage. Pre-infusion and post-infusion cell indices and aggregation data were compared by paired samples t-test. All statistical analyses were performed in GraphPad Prism (Version 8.0.0). Results: Thirteen patients were included in the analysis. Heavy menstrual bleeding was the suspected cause of iron deficiency in 83% of patients. Thrombocytosis was present in 15% of patients at pre-infusion and no patients at post-infusion. Average ferritin was 14 µg/L at pre-infusion and 126 µg/L at post-infusion. The peak platelet count within 6 months pre-infusion was 309 K/mm 3 (±89) vs. 274 (±64) K/mm 3 at post-infusion (p Conclusion: Correction of iron deficiency results in decreased platelet count and improves platelet aggregation over collagen. Iron repletion may also improve platelet reactivity in response to physiologic agonists. These findings may suggest that iron deficiency impairs hemostasis and that correction of low iron may be even more critical for women with heavy menstrual bleeding. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Shatzel: Aronora Inc,: Consultancy.

Background: Splanchnic vein thrombosis (SVT) occurs in a heterogenous group of patients secondary to a variety of risk factors including acute and chronic liver disease, malignancy, and myeloproliferative neoplasms. There is equipoise on the utility of anticoagulation in many patients with SVT given the perceived risks of bleeding and unclear benefits. We sought to determine which clinical factors predict new or progressive thrombosis in a cohort of patients with SVT. Methods: We undertook a retrospective cohort study of patients over 18 years of age identified to have an SVT at the Oregon Health & Science University from 01/01/2015 - 12/31/2020, including only patients who were not initially treated with anticoagulation at the time of their initial VTE diagnosis. Relevant clinical variables were selected apriori. The primary study endpoint was imaging-confirmed progression of SVT, development of cavernous transformation, intestinal ischemia, or new venous or arterial thrombosis. Chart demographics, patient history, and relevant lab values at the time of initial SVT were extracted for the analysis. Descriptive analysis, univariate logistic regression, and multivariable logistic regression were performed in STATA version 12.1 and R (R core team 2019). Results: Seventy-eight patients were included in the analysis (mean age 60 years old, 74% male). The most common SVT in the cohort was isolated portal vein thrombosis (N=60) followed by thrombosis of multiple splanchnic veins (N=14). The most prevalent causes of liver disease in the cohort were viral hepatitis (N=33) alcoholic cirrhosis (N=20) and non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (N=12). 66% of patients had known varices at diagnosis. 33% had thrombosis directly associated with a tumor. The mean platelet count and INR were 105 x 109/L and 1.55 respectively. Twenty-two patients (28%) developed the primary endpoint of thrombus progression. Univariate logistic regression found that prior history of thrombosis (OR 6, P= 0.04) and the presence of varices at diagnosis (OR 4.4, P= 0.02) were associated with progression. We then created a multivariable logistic regression model and observed that total bilirubin (ORadj = 0.34, p = 0.03), MELD score (ORadj = 1.33, p = 0.04), the presence of varices (ORadj = 11.7, 0.03), and BMI (ORadj = 1.14, p = 0.047) were significant predictors of our composite outcome while controlling for age, glomerular filtration rate, INR, and prior history of VTE. Discussion: In our heterogenous cohort of patients with SVT not treated with anticoagulation, one in four patients developed the composite endpoint of SVT progression, development of cavernous transformation, intestinal ischemia, or new venous or arterial thrombosis. Several common clinical variables appear to be predictive for thrombus progression, suggesting that predictive models may be feasible to determine which patients with SVT are likely to benefit from anticoagulation. Disclosures Shatzel: Aronora Inc,: Consultancy.

266 Background: Germline genetic testing and somatic genomic profiling using commercial multigene panels are now routine in mPDAC. A subset of these patients have deleterious alterations in genes involved with DDR. Herein we investigate the role of daDDR as a predictive biomarker for response to first-line platinum-based chemotherapy. Methods: Utilizing the IRB-approved pancreas cancer and genetics clinic databases at the University of Miami, we identified all patients with mPDAC who had germline and/or somatic mutation testing. We performed a retrospective chart review to extract demographic and clinical characteristics including treatments received, response and survival. Results: Between 2012 and 2018, 116 patients with mPDAC underwent germline (using Invitae, Ambry Counsyl or Myriad) and/or somatic testing (using FoundationOne CDx). Among these, 40 received first-line therapy with FOLFIRINOX (95%) or gemcitabine/cisplatin (5%). The median age was 59 years and 15 (38%) were female. The majority (70%) were Hispanic and 63% had de-novo mPDAC (treatment-naïve). Germline testing revealed daDDR in 5 patients and somatic NGS found an additional 4 patients with daDDR (total of 9 (23%), including 5 with BRCA2, one each with BRCA1, RAD51C, ATM and MUTYH). The median progression-free survival (PFS) was significantly longer in patients with daDDR than without (17.3 vs 7.8 months, log-rank p = 0.01). The median overall survival (OS) was not statistically different between the two groups. Three patients with daDDR had complete or near-complete radiological and tumor marker responses to FOLFIRINOX and were treated with olaparib (a PARP inhibitor) as maintenance and remain progression-free after 7, 12.4 and 13.6 months respectively. Conclusions: daDDR appears to define a subset of patients with mPDAC who may be more sensitive to platinum agents. There are currently no biomarkers for selection of first-line therapy in patients with mPDAC and we demonstrate that this composite biomarker which is easily done via commercially available assays may be able to inform treatment selection.