Search

Background and Aims Combination atezolizumab/bevacizumab is the gold standard for first-line treatment of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Our study investigated the efficacy and safety of combination therapy in older patients with HCC. Methods 191 consecutive patients from eight centres receiving atezolizumab and bevacizumab were included. Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), overall response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) defined by RECIST v1.1 were measured in older (age ≥ 65 years) and younger (age

Background Atezolizumab plus bevacizumab (Atezo/Bev) is first line-treatment for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Body mass index (BMI) has demonstrated predictive value for response to immunotherapy in non-HCC cancer types. Our study investigated the effect of BMI on safety and efficacy of real-life use of Atezo/Bev for unresectable HCC. Methods 191 consecutive patients from seven centres receiving Atezo/Bev were included in the retrospective study. Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), overall response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) defined by RECIST v1.1 were measured in overweight (BMI ≥ 25) and non-overweight (BMI Results Patients in the overweight cohort (n = 94) had higher rates of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and lower rates of Hepatitis B compared to non-overweight cohort (n = 97). Baseline Child–Pugh class and Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage were similar between cohorts, with lower rates of extrahepatic spread in the overweight group. Overweight patients had similar OS compared to non-overweight (median OS 15.1 vs. 14.9 months; p = 0.99). BMI did not influence median PFS (7.1 vs. 6.1 months; p = 0.42), ORR (27.2% vs. 22.0%; p = 0.44) and DCR (74.1% vs. 71.9%; p = 0.46). There were higher rates of atezolizumab-related fatigue (22.3% vs. 10.3%; p = 0.02) and bevacizumab-related thrombosis (8.5% vs. 2.1%; p = 0.045) in the overweight patients, but overall trAEs and treatment discontinuation were comparable between cohorts. Conclusion Atezo/Bev has comparable efficacy in overweight HCC patients, with an increase in treatment-related fatigue and thrombosis. Combination therapy is safe and efficacious to use in overweight patients, including those with underlying NAFLD.

Atezolizumab plus bevacizumab (AtezoBev) is the standard of care for first-line treatment of unresectable HCC. No evidence exists as to its use in routine clinical practice in patients with impaired liver function.In 216 patients with HCC who were consecutively treated with AtezoBev across 11 tertiary centers, we retrospectively evaluated treatment-related adverse events (trAEs) graded (G) according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v5.0, including in the analysis all patients treated according to label (n = 202, 94%). We also assessed overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), overall response (ORR), and disease control rates (DCR) defined by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors v1.1. Disease was mostly secondary to viral hepatitis, namely hepatitis C (n = 72; 36%) and hepatitis B infection (n = 35, 17%). Liver function was graded as Child-Pugh (CP)-A in 154 patients (76%) and CP-B in 48 (24%). Any grade trAEs were reported by 143 patients (71%), of which 53 (26%) were G3 and 3 (2%) G4. Compared with CP-A, patients with CP-B showed comparable rates of trAEs. Presence and grade of varices at pretreatment esophagogastroduodenoscopy did not correlate with bleeding events. After a median follow-up of 9.0 months (95% CI, 7.8-10.1), median OS was 14.9 months (95% CI, 13.6-16.3), whereas median PFS was 6.8 months (95% CI, 5.2-8.5). ORR and DCR were respectively 25% and 73%, with no difference across CP classes.This study confirms reproducible safety and efficacy of AtezoBev in routine practice. Patients with CP-B reported similar tolerability compared with CP-A, warranting prospective evaluation of AtezoBev in this treatment-deprived population.

Different approaches are available after progression of disease (PD) to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), including continuation of ICI, treatment switching to tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and cessation of anticancer therapy. We sought to characterise the relationship between radiologic patterns of progression and survival post-ICI, also appraising treatment strategies.We screened 604 HCC patients treated with ICIs, including only those who experienced PD by data cut-off. We evaluated post-progression survival (PPS) according to treatment strategy at PD and verified its relationship with radiologic patterns of progression: intrahepatic growth (IHG), new intrahepatic lesion (NIH), extrahepatic growth (EHG), new extrahepatic lesion (NEH) and new vascular invasion (nVI).Of 604 patients, 364 (60.3%) experienced PD during observation. Median PPS was 5.3 months (95%CI: 4.4-6.9; 271 events). At data cut-off, 165 patients (45%) received no post-progression anticancer therapy; 64 patients (17.6%) continued ICI beyond PD. IHG (HR 1.64 [95%CI:1.21-2.22]; p=0.0013) and nVI (HR 2.15 [95%CI:1.38-3.35]; p=0.0007) were associated with shorter PPS. Multivariate models adjusted for progression patterns, treatment line, and ALBI grade and ECOG-PS at PD confirmed receipt of ICI beyond PD with (HR 0.17, 95%CI 0.09-0.32; p0.0001), or without subsequent TKI (HR 0.39, 95%CI 0.26-0.58; p0.0001) as predictors of prolonged PPS versus no anticancer therapy.ICI-TKI sequencing is a consolidated option in advanced HCC. nVI and IHG predict poorer prognosis. Despite lack of recommendation, continuation of ICI beyond progression in HCC is adopted clinically: future efforts should appraise which patients benefit from this approach.

Simple Summary The investigation of predictive and prognostic markers is pivotal in patients affected by hepatocellular carcinoma treated with immune-checkpoint-inhibitors. Inflammation has a central role in hepatocellular carcinoma development and progression; however, its role in influencing outcomes in the context of immunotherapy has not been fully elucidated yet. In the following study, we investigated the prognostic role of bloods derived inflammatory markers and we found that they predict survival and response of patients treated with immunotherapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. Abstract Systemic inflammation is a hallmark of cancer, and it has a pivotal role in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) development and progression. We conducted a retrospective study including 362 patients receiving immune check-point inhibitors (ICIs) across three continents, evaluating the influence of neutrophiles to lymphocytes ratio (NLR), platelets to lymphocytes ratio (PLR), and prognostic nutritional index (PNI) on overall (OS), progression free survival (PFS), and radiologic responses. In our 362 patients treated with immunotherapy, median OS and PFS were 9 and 3.5 months, respectively. Amongst tested inflammatory biomarkers, patients with NLR ≥ 5 had shorter OS (7.7 vs. 17.6 months, p < 0.0001), PFS (2.1 vs. 3.8 months, p = 0.025), and lower objective response rate (ORR) (12% vs. 22%, p = 0.034); similarly, patients with PLR ≥ 300 reported shorter OS (6.4 vs. 16.5 months, p < 0.0001) and PFS (1.8 vs. 3.7 months, p = 0.0006). NLR emerged as independent prognostic factors for OS in univariate and multivariate analysis (HR 1.95, 95%CI 1.45–2.64, p < 0.001; HR 1.73, 95%CI 1.23–2.42, p = 0.002) and PLR remained an independent prognostic factor for both OS and PFS in multivariate analysis (HR 1.60, 95%CI 1.6–2.40, p = 0.020; HR 1.99, 95%CI 1.11–3.49, p = 0.021). Systemic inflammation measured by NLR and PLR is an independent negative prognostic factor in HCC patients undergoing ICI therapy. Further studies are required to understand the biological mechanisms underlying this association and to investigate the predictive significance of circulating inflammatory biomarkers in HCC patients treated with ICIs.

Background and Rationale: Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy is an expanding therapeutic option for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Antibiotics (ATB) taken prior to or early during ICI therapy can impact immunotherapy efficacy across indications; however, the effect of ATB is undefined in HCC. Methods: In a large international cohort of 450 ICI recipients from Europe, North America, and Asia, we categorized patients according to timing of ATB focusing on exposure within −30 to +30 days from ICI (early immunotherapy period [EIOP]). EIOP was evaluated in association with overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and best radiologic response using RECIST 1.1 criteria. Results: Our study comprised mostly cirrhotic (329, 73.3%) males (355, 79.1%) with a Child-Turcotte Pugh class of A (332, 73.9%), receiving ICI after 1 therapy line (251, 55.9%) for HCC of Barcelona clinic liver cancer stage C (325, 72.4%). EIOP (n = 170, 37.9%) was independent of baseline clinicopathologic features of HCC and correlated with longer PFS (6.1 vs. 3.7 months, log-rank p = 0.0135). EIOP+ patients had similar OS, overall response, and disease control rates (DCRs) compared to EIOP. The effect of EIOP persisted in landmark time analyses and in multivariable models, confirming the independent predictive role of EIOP in influencing PFS following adjustment for covariates reflective of tumor burden, liver function, and ICI regimen administered. In patients receiving programmed cell death-1 receptor/ligand inhibitors monotherapy, EIOP was also associated with higher DCRs (61.4% vs. 50.9%, p = 0.0494). Conclusions: Unlike other oncological indications, ATB in the 30 days before or after ICI initiation is associated with improved benefit from immunotherapy, independent of disease and treatment-related features. Evaluation of the immune microbiologic determinants of response to ICI in HCC warrants further investigation.

BackgroundImmune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionized treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. Integrated use of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE), a locoregional inducer of immunogenic cell death, with ICI has not been formally assessed for safety and efficacy outcomes.MethodsFrom a retrospective multicenter dataset of 323 patients treated with ICI, we identified 31 patients who underwent >1 TACE 60 days before or concurrently, with nivolumab at a single center. We derived a propensity score-matched cohort of 104 patients based on Child-Pugh Score, portal vein thrombosis, extrahepatic metastasis and alpha fetoprotein (AFP) who received nivolumab monotherapy. We described overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective responses according to modified RECIST criteria and safety in the multimodal arm in comparison to monotherapy.ResultsOver a median follow-up of 9.3 (IQR 4.0–16.4) months, patients undergoing multimodal immunotherapy with TACE achieved a significantly longer median (95% CI) PFS of 8.8 (6.2–23.2) vs 3.7 (2.7–5.4) months (log-rank 0.15, pConclusionsTACE can be safely integrated with programmed cell death 1 blockade and may lead to a significant delay in tumor progression and disease downstaging in selected patients.

The availability of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) for the management of advanced hepatocellular cancer (HCC) has changed the treatment paradigm. There are emerging questions regarding the efficacy of subsequent anticancer therapies. The primary aim of this retrospective, multicenter study was to examine the types of anticancer treatment received after ICIs and to assess the impact on post-ICI survival. We established an international consortium of 11 tertiary-care referral centers located in the USA (n = 249), Europe (n = 74), and Asia (n = 97), and described patterns of care following ICI therapy. The impact of subsequent therapy on overall survival (OS) was estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method and presented with a 95% confidence interval (CI). A total of 420 patients were treated with ICIs for advanced HCC after one line of systemic therapy (n = 371, 88.8%): 31 (8.8%) had died, 152 (36.2%) received best supportive care (BSC) following ICIs, and 163 patients (38.8%) received subsequent anticancer therapy. Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs, n = 132, 80.9%), in particular sorafenib (n = 49, 30.0%), were the most common post-ICI therapy followed by external beam radiotherapy (n = 28, 17.2%), further immunotherapy (n = 21, 12.9%), locoregional therapy (n = 23, 14.1%), chemotherapy (n = 9, 5.5%), and surgery (n = 6, 3.6%). Receipt of post-ICI therapy was associated with longer median OS compared with those who had received BSC (12.1 vs. 3.3 months; hazard ratio [HR]: 0.4 (95% CI: 2.7–5.0). No difference in OS was noted in those patients who received TKI before ICIs compared with those who received ICIs followed by TKI. Conclusion: Post-ICI therapy is associated with OS in excess of 12 months, suggesting a role for therapeutic sequencing. OS from TKI therapy was similar to that reported in registration studies, suggesting preserved efficacy following ICIs.

Purpose The development of treatment-related adverse events (trAE) correlates favorably with clinical outcomes in multiple studies of patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI); however, this relationship is undefined in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Patients and methods We derived a cohort of 406 patients with unresectable/advanced HCC receiving ICI therapy as part of international clinical trials submitted to the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in support of marketing applications. We tested whether the development of clinically significant trAE (i.e. graded ≥2, trAE2) predicted improved overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and objective response rates (ORR) following ICI. We established an international consortium of 10 tertiary-care referral centres located in Europe (n = 67), United States (US, n = 248) and Asia (n = 42) to validate this association. Results In the FDA dataset of 406 patients, 325 (80%) with Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stage C HCC mostly treated with ICI monotherapy (n = 258, 64%), trAE2 were reported in 228 patients (56.1%). Development of trAE2 was associated with longer OS (16.7 versus 11.2 months) and PFS (5.5 versus 2.2 months) and persisted as an independent predictor of outcome after adjusting for viral aetiology, gender, Child-Pugh class, BCLC stage, AFP levels, ECOG-PS, ICI regimen (mono/combination therapy) and receipt of corticosteroid therapy. In a multi-institutional cohort of 357 patients with similar characteristics mostly treated with ICI monotherapy (n = 304, 85%), the development of trAE2 was associated with longer OS (23.3 versus 12.1 months) and PFS (9.6 versus 3.9 months). TrAE2 were confirmed predictors of improved OS (HR 0.43; 95% CI:0.25–0.75) and PFS (HR 0.48; 95% CI: 0.31–0.75), with multivariable analyses confirming their association with outcome independent of clinicopathologic features of interest. Additional time-varying multivariable analyses also indicated that trAEs were associated with a decreased risk of progression (HR 0.56, 95% CI: 0.46–0.67) in the FDA dataset and death (HR 0.55; 95% CI: 0.32–0.95) in the multi-institutional dataset. Conclusion Development of trAE2 correlates with improved outcomes in patients with HCC receiving ICI in clinical trials and in routine practice. Prospective studies aimed at understanding the underlying immunologic foundations of such relationships are warranted to identify predictive biomarkers of toxicity and response.

The impact of corticosteroid therapy (CT) on efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) is undefined in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). We evaluated whether CT administered at baseline (bCT) or concurrently with ICI (cCT) influences overall (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall response rates (ORR) in 341 patients collected across 3 continents. Of 304 eligible patients, 78 (26%) received >10 mg prednisone equivalent daily either as bCT (n=14, 5%) or cCT (n=64, 21%). Indications for CT included procedure/prophylaxis (n=37, 47%), management of immune-related adverse event (n=27, 35%), cancer-related symptoms (n=8, 10%) or comorbidities (n=6, 8%). Neither overall CT, bCT nor cCT predicted for worse OS, PFS nor ORR in univariable and multivariable analyses (p>0.05). CT for cancer-related indications predicted for shorter PFS (p

Several targeted agents including multi-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (mTKIs) and immunotherapy (IO) agents have been approved for use beyond the frontline setting in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Due to lack of prospective head-to-head comparative trials, there is no standardized way for alternating those agents beyond frontline. Therefore, we performed a retrospective review of the Kansas University (KU) cancer registry to determine whether IO may be superior to non-IO therapy. Patients with advanced HCC were divided into two groups based on the second-line systemic regimen received (IO vs. non-IO). Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were calculated under the Kaplan&ndash, Meier and Cox proportional hazards models. No statistically significant differences in PFS and OS were found, although a non-significant delayed separation in the survival curve favoring IO was identified (median PFS 3.9 months vs. 3 months, median OS 10 months vs. 10 months respectively for IO vs. non-IO). This retrospective analysis is one of the earliest and largest studies comparing second-line IO and non-IO therapies thus far reported. Future studies should aim to define specific biomarkers for response prediction and treatment optimization based on individual patient and tumor characteristics. Furthermore, combinatorial therapeutic strategies is an evolving approach showing early promising signal.

BackgroundNivolumab is Food and Drug Administration approved in sorafenib-experienced, advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Post-registration data of treatment in a real-world setting is lacking.Patients and methodsWe performed an international, multicenter observational study to confirm safety and efficacy of nivolumab in 233 patients treated outside clinical trials from eight centers in North America, Europe and Asia.ResultsPatients received nivolumab for Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage C (n=191, 92.0%) and Child-Pugh (CP) A (n=158, 67.8%) or B (n=75, 32.2%) HCC as first (n=85, 36.5%) or second to fourth systemic therapy line (n=148, 63.5%). Objective response rate (ORR) was 22.4% and disease control rate was 52.1%. Median overall survival (OS) was 12.2 months (95% CI 8.4 to 16.0) and median progression-free survival was 10.1 months (95% CI 6.1 to 14.2). Treatment-related adverse events of grade >2 occurred in 26 patients (11.2%). Efficacy and safety were similar across CP classes and therapy line. OS was shorter in CP-B than A (7.3 months vs 16.3 months, p=0.05). Achievement of an objective response predicted for improved OS (25.4 months vs 13.2 months, pConclusionsThis study confirms safety and efficacy of nivolumab in advanced HCC across various lines of therapy and degrees of liver dysfunction. Despite equal ORR and toxicity to nivolumab, patients with CP-B functional class have shorter survival than the patients with CP-A.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) have shown positive results in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). As liver function contributes to prognosis, its precise assessment is necessary for the safe prescribing and clinical development of ICI in HCC. We tested the accuracy of the albumin-bilirubin (ALBI) grade as an alternative prognostic biomarker to the Child-Turcotte-Pugh (CTP). In a prospectively maintained multi-centre dataset of HCC patients, we assessed safety and efficacy of ICI across varying levels of liver dysfunction described by CTP (A to C) and ALBI grade and evaluated uni- and multi-variable predictors of overall (OS) and post-immunotherapy survival (PIOS). We studied 341 patients treated with programmed-death pathway inhibitors (n = 290, 85%). Pre-treatment ALBI independently predicted for OS, with median OS of 22.5, 9.6, and 4.6 months across grades (p &lt, 0.001). ALBI was superior to CTP in predicting 90-days mortality with area under the curve values of 0.65 (95% CI 0.57&ndash, 0.74) versus 0.63 (95% CI 0.54&ndash, 0.72). ALBI grade at ICI cessation independently predicted for PIOS (p &lt, 0.001). Following adjustment for ICI regimen, neither ALBI nor CTP predicted for overall response rates or treatment-emerging adverse events (p &gt, 0.05). ALBI grade identifies a subset of patients with prolonged survival prior to and after ICI therapy, lending itself as an optimal stratifying biomarker to optimise sequencing of systemic therapies in advanced HCC.

Background: Immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI) is an expanding option in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Antibiotics (ATB) have been shown to reduce response and survival after ICI in other cancers. Methods: Efficacy of ICI is described in patients (pt) from 11 centres (246 USA, 100 Asia, 68 Europe), with median overall (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) and best response (RECIST 1.1) compared between pt with and without ATB exposure in the early immunotherapy period (EIOP) of 30 days before and after ICI initiation. Results: Most of our 414 pt were cirrhotic (297, 71.7%) due to hepatitis C (162, 391.1%) with Barcelona Clinic Stage C (294, 71.0%), Child-Pugh class (CP) A (313, 76.3%) and AFP>400 IU/mL (158, 39.3%). OS was 15.4 mo (95%CI 13.1-17.7) and PFS was 5.3 months (95% CI 4.5-6.0). Most ICI was anti-PD-1 monotherapy (358, 86.5%) and given as 1st (173, 41.8%) or 2nd line (208, 50.2%). Best response to ICI was complete response in 27 pt (6.5%), partial response in 45 (10.9%), stable disease (SD) in 160 (38.6%) and progressive disease (PD) in 161 (38.9%). ATB was given to 167 pt (40.3%), prior to or early after (30 d) ICI initiation (EIOP, 157, 38.0%) or beyond 30 days (21, 5.1%), mostly as beta-lactams (27, 10.9%) or quinolones (26, 10.5%). ATB use was independent of CP class (p=0.76), ECOG performance status (p=0.58) and BCLC stage (p=0.60). mOS in the EIOP+ group was similar to the EIOP- group (13.1 vs 15.5 mo, p=0.92). mPFS in the EIOP+ group was significantly longer than the EIOP- group (7.9 vs 4.2 mo, p=0.004). Observations persisted when stratified by CP class (p=0.42) and ICI type (p=0.92). Partial response rate was higher in the EIOP+ group (17.3% vs 8.6%, p=0.01), although overall objective response and disease control rates were similar between EIOP groups (ORR: 22.7% vs 15.9%, p=0.10; DCR: 64.0% vs 56.6%, p=0.15). Pt in the EIOP+ group were not more likely to experience gastrointestinal AE (EIOP +/- 9.2%/5.4%, p=0.12) or hepatic AE (EIOP +/-, 17.9%/16.5%, p=0.92) of any grade, while severe liver AE (grade 2 or above) were less common in the EIOP+ group (EIOP+/- 2.8%/9.5%, p=0.01). Conclusions: ATB in the 30 d before or after ICI initiation in HCC is associated with prolonged PFS. This is contrary to findings in other solid tumors. Evaluation of the immune-microbiologic determinants of response to ICI in HCC a key research question. Citation Format: Petros Fessas, Muntaha Naeem, Thomas U. Marron, David Szafron, Elad Sharon, Anwar Saeed, Tomi Jun, Sirish Dharmapuri, Abdul R. Naqash, Thoetchai Peeraphatdit, Anuhya Gampa, Yinghong Wang, Uqba Khan, Mahvish Muzaffar, Musharraf Navaid, ChiehJu Lee, Pei-Chang Lee, Anushi Bulumulle, Bo Yu, Sonal Paul, Neil Nimkar, Dominik Bettinger, Hannah Hildebrand, Yehia I. Abugabal, Tiziana Pressiani, Nicola Personeni, Naoshi Nishida, Masatoshi Kudo, Ahmed Kaseb, Yi-Hsiang Huang, Celina Ang, Anjana Pillai, Lorenza Rimassa, David J. Pinato. Early antibiotic exposure delays disease progression following immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma: Evidence from an observational study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2021; 2021 Apr 10-15 and May 17-21. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(13_Suppl):Abstract nr 485.

Background: Antibiotic exposure has been associated with worse outcomes with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in cancer patients, likely due to disruption of the gut microbiome. Other commonly prescribed medications, such as proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) and histamine-2-receptor antagonists (H2RAs), are also known to disrupt the microbiome, but data on their association with ICI outcomes are conflicting. Methods: We conducted a retrospective, multicenter, international cohort study including 314 hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients treated with ICIs from 2017 to 2019 to assess the association between PPI or H2RA exposure (up to 30 days before ICI) and overall survival. Secondary outcomes included overall response rate (ORR) and development of any treatment-related adverse events (AEs). Results: Baseline PPI/H2RA exposure was not associated with overall survival in univariable (HR 1.01, 95% CI 0.75–1.35) or multivariable analysis (HR 0.98, 95% CI 0.71–1.36). Baseline PPI/H2RA exposure was not associated with either ORR (OR 1.32, 95% CI 0.66–2.65) or AEs (OR 1.07, 95% CI 0.54–2.12) in multivariable analysis. Conclusions: Our results suggest that exposure to PPI/H2RA prior to ICIs does not adversely affect outcomes in HCC patients.

e17046 Background: Patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) for muscle invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) often are not able to complete three or four cycles of therapy which is standard of care. Pathological completed response (pCR) is a surrogate marker for long term survival. We set out to determine if pCR differed based on total tolerated cycles prior to surgery in those receiving cisplatin based NAC. Methods: Data was gathered at our institution on patients receiving neoadjuvant gemcitabine with cisplatin (GC), or dose dense methotrexate, vinblastin, adriamycin, cisplatin (ddMVAC)). The primary outcome was pCR, and secondary outcome was downstaging. pCR was compared between those who received 1-2, 3, and 4 cycles. Results: A total of 92 patients receiving NAC during the years of 2014 to 2019. 12 received 2 or less cycles, 22 received 3, and 57 completed 4. Age was not significantly different between groups (69.7, ≤ 2), (69.0, 3), (67.4, 4). Gender differences were noted: (41.7% female, ≤ 2), (22.7% female, 3), (12.3% female, 4), p = 0.05. The rates of pCr among the three groups were: (16.7%, ≤ 2), (22.7%, 3), (40.4%, 4), p = 0.14. Downstaging was seen in: (33.3%, ≤ 2), (59.1%, 3), (52.6%, 4), p = 0.35. Conclusions: While not statistically significant our study suggests a trend on pCR rates related to the total of cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy prior to surgery. Limitations include retrospective design and small sample size.

e16677 Background: Nivo is FDA-approved in sorafenib-experienced, advanced HCC. Post-registration data to portray treatment in a real-world setting is lacking. Methods: We describe safety and efficacy of nivo in patients (pts) from 8 centres (USA n = 181, Asia n = 47, Europe n = 5), documenting overall (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), overall response (ORR) and disease control rates (DCR) (RECIST). Results: We analysed 233 pts, mostly cirrhotic (n = 176, 75%) due to hepatitis C (n = 95, 54.0%) with Barcelona Clinic Stage (BCLC) C HCC (n = 178, 76.4%), Child-Pugh class (CP) A (n = 158, 67.8%) or B (n = 75, 32.2%), and AFP > 400 IU/mL (n = 132, 56.7%). Nivo was given as first (1L, n = 85, 36.5%), second line (2L, n = 130, 55.8%) or > 2L (n = 18, 7.7%), after local (n = 191, 82%) and systemic therapy (n = 148, 63.5%), mostly sorafenib (n = 142, 60.9%). Median duration of nivo was 6.0 months (mo, interquartile range [IQR] 2.6-11.9) and stopped due to progression (n = 109, 46.8%) or toxicity (n = 8, 3.4%). After median follow up of 7 mo (IQR 3.0-12.3), ORR was 22.4% and DCR was 52.1%. Best responses (n = 219, 94%) included complete and partial responses in 18 (7.7%) and 31 (13.3%) pts respectively, stable disease in 65 (27.9%) and progressive disease in 105 (45.1%), not dissimilar by CP (p = 0.26). Median OS was 12.2 mo (95%CI 8.4-16.0) and predicted by CP (CPA 16.3 mo 95%CI 11.7-20.8; CPB 7.3 mo 95%CI 4.2-10.4; hazard ratio [HR] 1.9, p = 0.01), nivo line (1L 16.3 mo 95%CI 8.0-24.5; > 1L 10.4 mo 95%CI 7.4-13.5; HR 0.68, p = 0.05), and PVT (PVT- 13.8 mo 95%CI 11.7-16.0; PVT+ 10.4 mo 95%CI 7.8-13.0; HR 1.8, p = 0.015) but not cirrhosis, AFP, BCLC or steroid use (p > 0.05). Median PFS was 10.1 mo (95%CI 6.1-14.2), predicted by BCLC (A-B 19.0 mo 95%CI 7.1-30.8; C 8.2 mo 95%CI 4.9-11.4; HR 2.8, p = 0.002) and line (1L 18.2 mo 95%CI 10.4-25.9; > 1L 8.2 mo 95% CI 6.2-10.2; HR 0.60, p = 0.021), but not cirrhosis, AFP, or steroid use (p > 0.05). 26 pts (11.2%) suffered > = Grade 2 toxicities, most commonly fatigue (n = 29, 24.7%). Conclusions: Real-world use of nivo in advanced HCC across line of therapy suggests reproducible clinical efficacy and safety compared to prospective trials.

531 Background: The impact of corticosteroid treatment (CT) on the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is undefined. We evaluated whether CT administered at baseline (bCT) or concurrently to ICI (cCT) influences clinical outcomes of HCC patients treated with ICI. Methods: This retrospective, multi-center observational study was conducted across 9 tertiary academic referral centers collected 341 HCC patients who received ICI across 3 continents between January 1, 2016 and April 1, 2019. Outcome measures included overall (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) calculated from time of ICI commencement and overall response rates (ORR) defined by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (v1.1) on 6-8 weekly periodic restaging. Results: Of 331 eligible patients, 254 (76%) had BCLC-C stage HCC and received mostly PD(L)-1 ICI monotherapy (n=250, 85%). Median OS was 12.1 months (95%CI 9.2-15.0 months) and median PFS was 8.1 months (95%CI 6.3-10 months). In total 81 patients (24%) received >10 mg prednisone equivalent daily either as bCT (n=15, 4%) or cCT (n=66, 20%). Indications for CT included procedure/prophylaxis (n=37, 45%), management of irAE (n=31, 37%), cancer-related symptoms (n=5, 2%) or comorbidities (n=8, 3%). Neither overall CT, bCT nor cCT predicted for worse OS, PFS nor ORR in uni- and multi-variable analyses (p>0.05). CT for cancer-related indications predicted for shorter PFS (2.4 vs. 11.3 months, p=0.01), OS (4.5 vs. 12.8 months, p=0.05) and reduced ORR (p=0.03) compared to cancer-unrelated indications. Conclusions: This is the first study to demonstrate that neither bCT nor cCT appear to influence response and OS following ICI in HCC. Worse survival and ORR in CT recipients for cancer-related indications appears driven by the poor prognosis associated with symptomatic HCC.

533 Background: Sorafenib or lenvatinib are the current frontline options for advanced HCC. Multiple biologic agents including multi-Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors (TKI) cabozantinib & regorafenib have been recently approved for the previously treated population. Immunotherapy (IO) agent Nivolumab have also been approved in the same setting. Due to lack of prospective head to head comparison, there is no standardized way for alternating those agents beyond frontline. Methods: We performed a retrospective review of KU cancer registry. Patients with advanced HCC were divided into 2 groups based on the 2nd line systemic regimen (IO vs non-IO). Kaplan–Meier and Cox proportional hazards models were utilized to evaluate progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Results: Between 2016-2019, 98 patients were identified, 41 received IO, while 57 received biologics. All patients had sorafinib as 1st line therapy. Most patients have ECOG 0-1 and Child-Pugh class A or B. 55% had hepatitis C, 6% hepatitis B and 27 % have history of alcohol misuse. Almost 50% of patients have received prior liver directed therapy. Comparing IO vs non-IO groups, median PFS was 3.9 months vs 3 months and median OS was 10 months vs 10 months. There was no statistically significant difference in PFS & OS but there was a delay separation in the survival curve favoring IO. Similar outcome was seen in a sub-group analysis of the hepatitis C patients. Conclusions: This retrospective comparative review of current 2nd line regimens is one of the first & largest studies reported. In this study population, IO was not superior to multi-TKI as a 2nd line regimen. The late survival curve separation favoring IO might suggest a delay IO effect in a subgroup of patients. Future studies should define specific biomarkers that could predict response and allow treatment to be optimized depending on patient and tumor characteristics. Furthermore, combining IO plus multi-TKI might be a promising next step in development. A number of ongoing trials are testing this strategy including our CAMILLA trial of Cabozantinib plus Durvalumab, currently enrolling patients at the University of Kansas Cancer Center NCT03539822 .

e15156 Background: There are differences in the incidence, clinical presentation, molecular pathogenesis and outcome of colorectal cancer (CRC) based on tumor location. Emerging research suggests that perioperative carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) ratio (post-op/pre-op CEA) is a prognostic factor for CRC patients. We aimed to determine the association between tumor location, CEA ratio, smoking status and overall survival (OS) among patients with CRC. Methods: We analysed 323 patients who underwent resection for CRC at KUMC. After excluding those without pre- or post-operative CEA data, 162 patients were classified as either high ( > = 0.5) or low ( < 0.5) ratio. Primary outcomes were: 1) OS stratified by tumor location; 2) OS stratified by CEA ratio; and 3) whether the association between CEA ratio and OS differed by tumor location, after adjusting for stage and smoking status. Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate survival rates, and Cox proportional hazards models for multivariate analysis. Results: The median age was 63 years (inter-quartile range 53-72), 61% male, 43% smokers, 73% left-sided tumors, median pre-operative CEA was 3.0 (IQR 1.5-7), and 64% had CEA ratio > = 0.5. The OS rates were 85.7% and 91.9% in patients with left-sided vs right-sided tumors respectively (log-rank p-value = 0.9). The OS rates were 83.5% and 91.5% in patients with high vs low CEA ratios respectively (log-rank p-value = 0.3). The effect of CEA ratio on OS was significantly different when stratified by tumor location (p-value for interaction < 0.001). However, in the stratified analysis, the n was too small to permit further inferential analysis. In multivariate analysis, both tumor location (HR 0.6; p = 0.5) and CEA ratio (HR 1.5; p = 0.5) were not significantly associated with OS after adjusting for smoking status and tumor stage. Smoking was significantly associated with higher rates of death (HR 3.9; p = 0.04) when adjusted for tumor location, CEA ratio, and tumor stage. Conclusions: There was no difference in OS between left versus right-sided tumors. The association between CEA ratio and OS was significantly modified by tumor location. However, to attribute this modification to left vs right warrants validation in a larger cohort as our sample size was limited. Smoking increases mortality irrespective of right vs left sided CRC.