1. Assessment: dermatomal somatosensory evoked potentials. Report of the American Academy of Neurology's Therapeutics and Technology Assessments Subcommittee.
- Author
-
Ferguson, JH, Brin, M, Goldstein, ML, Gorelich, PB, Hanley, DF, Lange, DJ, Nuwer, MR, Roach, ES, Goldman, R, Goodin, D, and Marini, AM
- Subjects
Brain ,Humans ,Therapeutics ,Electric Stimulation ,Technology ,Medical ,Neurology ,Evoked Potentials ,Somatosensory ,Societies ,Medical ,United States ,Evaluation Studies as Topic ,Skin Physiological Phenomena ,Medical Laboratory Science ,Technology ,Medical ,Evoked Potentials ,Somatosensory ,Societies ,Neurology & Neurosurgery ,Clinical Sciences ,Neurosciences ,Cognitive Sciences - Abstract
The different conclusions reached by studies investigating the utility of DSEPs prevent a confident conclusion regarding utility. Some investigators are strong believers in the diagnostic usefulness of this technique. Others are mere skeptical. One possible cause is variable study design. Most studies provide evidence no higher than level III (case reports, expert opinions). Controlled studies, especially with blinded interpreters of the tests, would provide needed evidence of efficacy in view of the existing confusion in the literature. It is our consensus that the current evidence supporting the diagnostic use of DSEPs is Type D and that DSEPs should be regarded as Investigational, meaning that current evidence is insufficient to determine appropriateness. This group does encourage further study.
- Published
- 1997