Search

Background Pleurodesis is done as an in-patient procedure to control symptomatic recurrent malignant pleural effusion (MPE) and has a success rate of 75–80%. Thoracic ultrasonography has been shown in a small study to predict pleurodesis success early by demonstrating cessation of lung sliding (a normal sign seen in healthy patients, lung sliding indicates normal movement of the lung inside the thorax). We aimed to investigate whether the use of thoracic ultrasonography in pleurodesis pathways could shorten hospital stay in patients with MPE undergoing pleurodesis. Methods The Efficacy of Sonographic and Biological Pleurodesis Indicators of Malignant Pleural Effusion (SIMPLE) trial was an open-label, randomised controlled trial done in ten respiratory centres in the UK and one respiratory centre in the Netherlands. Adult patients (aged ≥18 years) with confirmed MPE who required talc pleurodesis via either a chest tube or as poudrage during medical thorascopy were eligible. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to thoracic ultrasonography-guided care or standard care via an online platform using a minimisation algorithm. In the intervention group, daily thoracic ultrasonography examination for lung sliding in nine regions was done to derive an adherence score: present (1 point), questionable (2 points), or absent (3 points), with a lowest possible score of 9 (preserved sliding) and a highest possible score of 27 (complete absence of sliding); the chest tube was removed if the score was more than 20. In the standard care group, tube removal was based on daily output volume (per British Thoracic Society Guidelines). The primary outcome was length of hospital stay, and secondary outcomes were pleurodesis failure at 3 months, time to tube removal, all-cause mortality, symptoms and quality-of-life scores, and cost-effectiveness of thoracic ultrasonography-guided care. All outcomes were assessed in the modified intention-to-treat population (patients with missing data excluded), and a non-inferiority analysis of pleurodesis failure was done in the per-protocol population. This trial was registered with ISRCTN, ISRCTN16441661. Findings Between Dec 31, 2015, and Dec 17, 2019, 778 patients were assessed for eligibility and 313 participants (165 [53%] male) were recruited and randomly assigned to thoracic ultrasonography-guided care (n=159) or standard care (n=154). In the modified intention-to-treat population, the median length of hospital stay was significantly shorter in the intervention group (2 days [IQR 2–4]) than in the standard care group (3 days [2–5]; difference 1 day [95% CI 1–1]; pInterpretation Thoracic ultrasonography-guided care for pleurodesis in patients with MPE results in shorter hospital stay (compared with the British Thoracic Society recommendation for pleurodesis) without reducing the success rate of the procedure at 3 months. The data support consideration of standard use of thoracic ultrasonography in patients undergoing MPE-related pleurodesis. Funding Marie Curie Cancer Care Committee

Background Malignant pleural effusion (MPE) is common and imposes a significant burden on patients and health-care providers. Most patients require definitive treatment, usually drainage and chemical pleurodesis, to relieve symptoms and prevent fluid recurrence. Thoracic ultrasound (TUS) can identify the presence of pleural adhesions in other clinical scenarios, and could therefore have a role in predicting long-term pleurodesis success or failure in MPE. Methods Patients undergoing chest tube drainage and talc slurry pleurodesis for symptomatic MPE were recruited to a prospective observational cohort pilot study assessing whether TUS findings pre-talc and post-talc instillation predicted treatment outcome. Participants underwent TUS examination immediately before, and 24 h after talc slurry administration to derive pleural adherence scores for the affected hemithorax. The recorded TUS scans were additionally scored by two independent assessors blinded to the patient's clinical status. The primary outcome was pleurodesis success at 1-month and 3-month follow-up. Results Eighteen participants were recruited to the pilot study. Participants who suffered pleurodesis failure had a lower pleural adherence score at 24 h post-talc instillation than those who were successful (difference of 6.27; 95% CI, 3.94-8.59). TUS examination was acceptable to patients, while TUS scoring was highly consistent across all assessors (intraclass correlation coefficient, 0.762; 95% CI, 0.605-0.872). Conclusion A TUS-derived pleural adherence score may facilitate early prediction of long-term outcomes following chemical pleurodesis, with implications for personalized care and decision making in MPE. Further research is needed to evaluate this novel finding. Trial Registry ClinicalTrials.gov; No. NCT02625675; URL: www.clinicaltrials.gov.

Importance Malignant pleural effusion (MPE) is challenging to manage. Talc pleurodesis is a common and effective treatment. There are no reliable data, however, regarding the optimal method for talc delivery, leading to differences in practice and recommendations. Objective To test the hypothesis that administration of talc poudrage during thoracoscopy with local anesthesia is more effective than talc slurry delivered via chest tube in successfully inducing pleurodesis. Design, Setting, and Participants Open-label, randomized clinical trial conducted at 17 UK hospitals. A total of 330 participants were enrolled from August 2012 to April 2018 and followed up until October 2018. Patients were eligible if they were older than 18 years, had a confirmed diagnosis of MPE, and could undergo thoracoscopy with local anesthesia. Patients were excluded if they required a thoracoscopy for diagnostic purposes or had evidence of nonexpandable lung. Interventions Patients randomized to the talc poudrage group (n = 166) received 4 g of talc poudrage during thoracoscopy while under moderate sedation, while patients randomized to the control group (n = 164) underwent bedside chest tube insertion with local anesthesia followed by administration of 4 g of sterile talc slurry. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary outcome was pleurodesis failure up to 90 days after randomization. Secondary outcomes included pleurodesis failure at 30 and 180 days; time to pleurodesis failure; number of nights spent in the hospital over 90 days; patient-reported thoracic pain and dyspnea at 7, 30, 90, and 180 days; health-related quality of life at 30, 90, and 180 days; all-cause mortality; and percentage of opacification on chest radiograph at drain removal and at 30, 90, and 180 days. Results Among 330 patients who were randomized (mean age, 68 years; 181 [55%] women), 320 (97%) were included in the primary outcome analysis. At 90 days, the pleurodesis failure rate was 36 of 161 patients (22%) in the talc poudrage group and 38 of 159 (24%) in the talc slurry group (adjusted odds ratio, 0.91 [95% CI, 0.54-1.55]; P = .74; difference, –1.8% [95% CI, –10.7% to 7.2%]). No statistically significant differences were noted in any of the 24 prespecified secondary outcomes. Conclusions and Relevance Among patients with malignant pleural effusion, thoracoscopic talc poudrage, compared with talc slurry delivered via chest tube, resulted in no significant difference in the rate of pleurodesis failure at 90 days. However, the study may have been underpowered to detect small but potentially important differences. Trial Registration ISRCTN Identifier: ISRCTN47845793

Background There is growing interest in bedside thoracic ultrasound (TUS) beyond assessment of pleural disease or as an adjunct for interventions. TUS is used by some clinicians as an extension of physical examination, assessing the lung with results used to influence clinical decisions. Despite the publication of training curricula and consensus guidelines,1 there are few objective and robust data to demonstrate the utility of TUS in this area of clinical practice.Methods 30 patients undergoing haemodialysis were prospectively recruited to an observational cohort study (NCT01949402; REC 13/SC/0319). Patients underwent standardised TUS assessment before, during and after haemodialysis; a total lung B-line score was generated, alongside a binary label of whether appearances were consistent with interstitial syndrome or not. TUS video clips were recorded and scored by two blinded expert clinician sonographers asked to follow consensus statement guidance.1 Low-dose non-contrast CT thorax pre- and post-dialysis was used as the 'gold standard' radiologic comparison, and completed a questionnaire addressing satisfaction with TUS assessment.Results TUS detected a progressive reduction in B-line score in most patients undergoing haemodialysis, with moderate correlation with the volume of fluid removed once those patients with minimal B-lines pre-dialysis were discounted (figure 1). By contrast, there was no lung parenchymal change evident on CT pre- and post-dialysis in any of the patients studied. Interobserver agreement was good for total B-line score (ICC 0.63, 95% CI 0.52textendash0.72) and diagnosing interstitial syndrome (κ=0.60, 95% CI 0.47textendash0.73). TUS assessment was acceptable to patients, with none considering it time-consuming or unwilling to have it again if needed.Conclusion This is the first study to demonstrate, using blinded outcome assessment, that TUS can detect variation in the appearance of the lungs, manifest as a B-line score, caused by changes in fluid status during haemodialysis, and that TUS appears to be more sensitive than CT. Further studies are needed to investigate the utility of TUS as a diagnostic tool in this and similar clinical contexts and how it might impact on patient care and outcomes.Funding Esaote UK; Rosetrees Trust, UKReferenceIntensive Care Med 2012;38(4):577textendash91.Abstract P99 Figure 1

Background: Pleural infection is a common complication of pneumonia associated with high mortality and poor clinical outcome. We performed a feasibility interventional clinical trial assessing the safety and significance of ultrasound (US)-guided pleural biopsy culture to increase the microbiological yield. Methods: 20 patients with established pleural infection were recruited. Participants underwent a detailed US and US-guided pleural biopsies before chest drain insertion, alongside standard clinical management. Pleural biopsies and routine clinical samples were submitted for microbiological analysis. In an exploratory sub-study, the 16S rRNA technique was applied on pleural biopsy samples, to investigate its’ utility on increasing speed and accuracy versus standard microbiological diagnosis. Findings US-guided were safe with no adverse events observed in this study. Pleural biopsies increased microbiological yield by 30% in addition to pleural fluid and blood samples. The 16S rRNA technique was successfully applied to pleural biopsy samples, demonstrating high sensitivity (93%) and specificity (89·5%). Interpretation Our findings demonstrate safety of conducting US guided biopsies in patients with pleural infection and a substantial increase in microbiological diagnosis. qPCR primer assessment of pleural fluid and biopsy appears to have excellent sensitivity and specificity.

Introduction Malignant pleural effusion (MPE) is common and currently in UK there are an estimated 50 000 new cases of MPE per year. Talc pleurodesis remains one of the most popular methods for fluid control. The value of thoracic ultrasound (TUS) imaging, before and after pleurodesis, in improving the quality and efficacy of care for patients with MPE remains unknown. Additionally, biomarkers of successful pleurodesis including measurement of pleural fluid proteins have not been validated in prospective studies. The SIMPLE trial is an appropriately powered, multicentre, randomised controlled trial designed to assess ’by the patient bedside' use of TUS imaging and pleural fluid analysis in improving management of MPE. Methods and analysis 262 participants with a confirmed MPE requiring intervention will be recruited from hospitals in UK and The Netherlands. Participants will be randomised (1:1) to undergo either chest drain insertion followed by instillation of sterile talc, or medical thoracoscopy and simultaneous poudrage. The allocated procedure will be done while the patient is hospitalised, and within 3 days of randomisation. Following hospital discharge, participants will be followed up at 1, 3 and 12 months. The primary outcome measure is the length of hospital stay during initial hospitalisation. Ethics and dissemination The trial has received ethical approval from the South Central-Oxford C Research Ethics Committee (Reference number 15/SC/0600). The Trial Steering Committee includes an independent chair and members, and a patient representative. The trial results will be published in a peer-reviewed journal and presented at international conferences. Trial registration number ISRCTN: 16441661.

INTRODUCTION: The management of recurrent malignant pleural effusions (MPE) can be challenging. Various options are available, with the most efficacious and widely used being talc pleurodesis. Talc can either be applied via a chest drain in the form of slurry, or at medical thoracoscopy using poudrage. Current evidence regarding which method is most effective is conflicting and often methodologically flawed. The TAPPS trial is a suitably powered, multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial designed to compare the pleurodesis success rate of medical thoracoscopy and talc poudrage with chest drain insertion and talc slurry. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: 330 patients with a confirmed MPE requiring intervention will be recruited from UK hospitals. Patients will be randomised (1:1) to undergo either small bore (