Search

Abstract Background Little is known about the induction of humoral responses directed against human autoantigens during acute inflammation. We utilized a highly sensitive antibody profiling technology to study autoantibodies in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and severe sepsis, conditions characterized by intensive immune activation leading to multiple organ dysfunction. Methods Using Luciferase Immunoprecipitation Systems (LIPS), a cohort of control, ARDS and sepsis patients were tested for antibodies to a panel of autoantigens. Autoantibody titers greater than the mean plus 3 SD of the 24 control samples were used to identify seropositive samples. Available longitudinal samples from different seropositive ARDS and sepsis patient samples, starting from within the first two days after admission to the intensive care, were then analyzed for changes in autoantibody over time. Results From screening patient plasma, 57% of ARDS and 46% of septic patients without ARDS demonstrated at least one statistically significant elevated autoantibody compared to the controls. Frequent high titer antibodies were detected against a spectrum of autoantigens including potassium channel regulator, gastric ATPase, glutamic decarboxylase-65 and several cytokines. Analysis of serial samples revealed that several seropositive patients had low autoantibodies at early time points that often rose precipitously and peaked between days 7-14. Further, the use of therapeutic doses of corticosteroids did not diminish the rise in autoantibody titers. In some cases, the patient autoantibody titers remained elevated through the last serum sample collected. Conclusion The rapid induction of autoantibodies in ARDS and severe sepsis suggests that ongoing systemic inflammation and associated tissue destruction mediate the break in tolerance against these self proteins.

Introduction: Multidisciplinary Pulmonary Embolism Response Teams (PERTs) streamline care of adults with life-threatening pulmonary embolism (PE). Given rarity of pediatric PE, developing a clinical, educational, and research PERT paradigm is a novel and underutilized concept in pediatrics., Research Question: Is PERT feasible in pediatrics, and does it improve PE care?, Study Design and Methods: A strategy-to-execution proposal to launch a pediatric PERT was developed for institutional buy-in. Key stakeholders collectively implemented PERT. Data were collected for the two-year pre- and post-PERT eras, and outcomes were compared., Results: PERT implementation took 12 months. Our PERT, led by hematology, comprises of pediatric experts in emergency medicine, critical care, interventional cardiology, anesthesiology, and interventional radiology. Data on 30 patients pre-PERT and 31 post-PERT were analyzed. Pre-PERT, 10%(3/30), 13%(4/30), 20%(6/30), and 57%(17/30), and post-PERT, 3%(1/31), 10%(3/31), 16%(5/31), and 71%(22/31) were categorized as high-risk, intermediate-LOW risk, intermediate-HIGH risk, and low-risk PE, respectively. Post-PERT, there were 13 unique PERT activations. PERT was activated on all eligible PE patients and, additionally, on four low-risk PEs. Time-to-echocardiogram was shorter post-PERT (4.7 hrs vs 2 hrs, P=0.0147). Anticoagulation was ordered (90 min vs 54 min, P=0.003) and given sooner (154 min vs 113 min, P=0.049) post-PERT. There were no differences in time-to-reperfusion therapies (12 hrs pre-PERT vs 8.7 hrs post-PERT, P=0.1). Five (83.3%) of six eligible (intermediate-HIGH and high-risk) patients received reperfusion therapies in the post-PERT era compared to three (37.5%) of eight eligible patients in the pre-PERT era (P=0.0001). There were no differences in major bleeding, mortality, or length of stay in either era., Interpretation: The pediatric PERT paradigm was successfully created and adopted locally. Our PERT enhanced access to experts, facilitated timely advanced therapies, and held value for low-risk PE. The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (UTSW) and Children's Health System of Texas pediatric PERT may serve as a best-practice model for streamlining care for pediatric PE., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Synthetic biology involves the engineering of proteins, signaling pathways and even whole organisms using modular designs and formats. A major tool of synthetic biology is artificial gene synthesis, which provides a direct means from a conceptualized DNA sequence to the corresponding physical DNA for the construction of a variety of biological components. To date, synthetic biology has often been used to answer fundamental questions in basic research, but now is poised to greatly enhance translational research. In this review, we discuss several translational applications of synthetic biology including the construction of novel diagnostics and vaccines, development of new synthetic pathways for drug screening and biosynthesis, and the creation of engineered viruses and microbes to fight human disease. Together these and other novel translational applications of artificial gene synthesis and synthetic biology have the opportunity to make major advances for improving human health.

Autoantibody levels to the SSA complex, composed of Ro52 and Ro60 proteins, are commonly measured in the diagnoses of Sjögren's Syndrome (SjS), as well as other rheumatological diseases. One of these proteins, Ro52, is an interferon-inducible member of the tripartite motif family bearing a RING motif functioning as an E3 ligase that ubiquitinates interferon regulatory factor 8 and other proteins. Using Luciferase Immunoprecipitation Systems (LIPS) we explored the antigenicity of Ro52 in detail. Analysis of antibody responses against Ro52 and 20 other established antigens revealed that Ro52 had the highest antibody titers and most likely represents one of the most immunogenic human proteins. While the antibody titers in many of the SjS patients were significantly and substantially higher than the controls, all healthy individuals had anti-Ro52 autoantibodies. N- and C-terminal fragments of Ro52 showed immunoreactivity in these serum samples, but the sums of these antibody titers were significantly lower than the antibody titers directed against the full-length Ro52. Antibody profiling of controls and SjS patients with three different N-terminal fragments of Ro52 revealed that the coiled-coil region was the most useful diagnostic (66% sensitivity), followed by the B-box (31% sensitivity), and then the RING-finger (24% sensitivity). The C-terminal region of Ro52, containing the B30.2 domain, showed higher antibody titers in SjS patients compared to controls and this region was responsible for the high level of Ro52 immunoreactivity in healthy individuals. Analysis of immunoreactivity to TRIM5, a Ro52-related protein, and the B30.2 domain from BTN1 and pyrin, failed to show significant antibody titers with the control or SjS patient serum. These results highlight the unusually high level of Ro52 antigenicity and demonstrate that autoantibodies are directed at both linear and conformational epitopes spanning the entire molecule.