Search

Existing studies suggest that biochar application can reduce soil nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions, mainly based on short‐term results. However, it remains unclear what the effects (i.e., legacy effects) and underlying mechanisms are on N2O emissions after many years of a single application of biochar. Here, we collected intact soil columns from plots without and with biochar application in a subtropical tea plantation 7 years ago for an incubation experiment. We used the N2O isotopocule analysis combined with ammonia oxidizer‐specific inhibitors and molecular biology approaches to investigate how the legacy effect of biochar affected soil N2O emissions. Results showed that the soil in the presence of biochar had lower N2O emissions than the control albeit statistically insignificant. The legacy effect of biochar in decreasing N2O emissions may be attributed to the reduced effectiveness of the soil substrate, nitrification and denitrification activities, and the promotion of the further reduction of N2O. The legacy effect of biochar reduced the relative contribution of nitrifier denitrification/bacterial denitrification, nitrification‐related N2O production, and the relative abundance of several microorganisms involved in the nitrogen cycle. Our global meta‐analysis also showed that the reduction of N2O by biochar increased with increasing application rate but diminished and possibly even reversed with increasing experimental time. In conclusion, our findings suggest that the abatement capacity of biochar on soil N2O emissions may weaken over time after biochar application, but this remains under further investigation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Ammonia (NH3) emissions from fertilized soils to the atmosphere and the subsequent deposition to land surface exert adverse effects on biogeochemical nitrogen (N) cycling. The region‐ and crop‐specific emission factors (EFs) of N fertilizer for NH3 are poorly developed and therefore the global estimate of soil NH3 emissions from agricultural N fertilizer application is constrained. Here we quantified the region‐ and crop‐specific NH3 EFs of N fertilizer by compiling data from 324 worldwide manipulative studies and focused to map the global soil NH3 emissions from agricultural N fertilizer application. Globally, the NH3 EFs averaged 12.56% and 14.12% for synthetic N fertilizer and manure, respectively. Regionally, south‐eastern Asia had the highest NH3 EFs of synthetic N fertilizer (19.48%) and Europe had the lowest (6%), which might have been associated with the regional discrepancy in the form and rate of N fertilizer use and management practices in agricultural production. Global agricultural NH3 emissions from the use of synthetic N fertilizer and manure in 2014 were estimated to be 12.32 and 3.79 Tg N/year, respectively. China (4.20 Tg N/year) followed by India (2.37 Tg N/year) and America (1.05 Tg N/year) together contributed to over 60% of the total global agricultural NH3 emissions from the use of synthetic N fertilizer. For crop‐specific emissions, the NH3 EFs averaged 11.13%–13.95% for the three main staple crops (i.e., maize, wheat, and rice), together accounting for 72% of synthetic N fertilizer‐induced NH3 emissions from croplands in the world and 70% in China. The region‐ and crop‐specific NH3 EFs of N fertilizer established in this study offer references to update the default EF in the IPCC Tier 1 guideline. This work also provides an insight into the spatial variation of soil‐derived NH3 emissions from the use of synthetic N fertilizer in agriculture at the global and regional scales. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Biochar has been used as an amendment to improve soil fertility and increase crop yield. However, the effects of biochar on soil properties and rapeseed yield in upland red soil have not been thoroughly investigated, and the factors crucial for rapeseed yield are not yet clear. A five-year field trial was conducted to investigate the effects the of biochar (biochar application rates of 0, 2.5, 5, 10, 20, 30, and 40 t ha−1, respectively) on soil physicochemical and microbial properties as well as rapeseed yield in upland red soil in Jiangxi Province, China. Results showed that biochar can significantly increase soil pH, available phosphorus, organic carbon, K s, and water retention, however, the influences of biochar on these indexes declined over time. Soil total nitrogen increased significantly when the dose of biochar exceeded 5 t ha−1, and the content of total nitrogen in the 40 t ha−1 biochar treatment increased each year. While the application of biochar gradually increased the contents of NH 4 +-N, NO 3 −-N and enhanced the soil microorganism and enzymatic activities during the first three years, they had returned nearly to their starting values by the end of this study. Rapeseed yield and yield components were significantly improved relative to the control for all biochar amendments in the first year, but the rapeseed yield in all biochar treatments decreased steadily after 2012. According to the principal components analysis and path analysis, the most responsive parameters in the upland red soil were soil acidity and hydraulic properties, meanwhile, soil acidity and hydraulic properties had greater impacts on rapeseed yield than did other indexes. Taken together, these results suggest that biochar can significantly improve soil fertility and rapeseed yield, but the improvements are not permanent. Soil acidity and hydraulic properties were the crucial factors that determined soil fertility and rapeseed yield in upland red soil. Graphical abstract Unlabelled Image Highlights • The effects of 7 rates of biochar in an upland red soil were studied over 5 years. • Soil pH and hydraulic property are major influences on upland red soil fertility. • Biochar can improve rape yield by raising soil pH and water percolation and retention. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Inland freshwater ecosystems are of increasing concerns in global methane (CH 4 ) budget in the atmosphere. Agricultural irrigation watersheds are a potential CH 4 emission hotspot owing to the anthropogenic carbon and nutrients loading. However, large-scale spatial variations of CH 4 concentrations and fluxes in agricultural catchments remain poorly understood, constraining an accurate regional estimate of CH 4 budgets. Here, we examined the spatiotemporal variations of dissolved CH 4 concentrations and fluxes from typical freshwater types (ditch, reservoir and river) within an agricultural irrigation watershed from Hongze catchment, which is subjected to intensive agricultural and rural activities in Eastern China. The dissolved CH 4 concentrations and fluxes showed similar temporal variations among the three freshwater types, with the highest rates in summer and the lowest rates in winter. The total CH 4 emission from this agricultural irrigation watershed was estimated to be 0.002 Gg CH 4 yr -1 , with annual mean CH 4 concentration and flux of 0.12 μmol L -1 and 0.58 mg m -2 d -1 , respectively. Diffusive CH 4 fluxes varied in samples taken from different freshwater types, the annual mean CH 4 fluxes for ditch, reservoir and river were 0.31 ± 0.06, 0.71 ± 0.13 and 0.72 ± 0.25 mg m -2 d -1 , respectively. Among three freshwater types, the CH 4 fluxes were the lowest in ditch, which was associated with the lowest responses of CH 4 fluxes to water dissolved oxygen (DO), nitrate nitrogen (NO 3 - -N) and sediment dissolved organic carbon (DOC) concentrations in ditch. In addition, water velocity and wind speed were significantly lower in ditch than in reservoir and river, suggesting that they also played important roles in explaining the spatial variability of dissolved CH 4 concentrations and fluxes. These results highlighted a need for more field measurements with wider spatial coverage and finer frequency, which would further improve the reliability of flux estimates for assessing the contribution of agricultural watersheds to the regional and global CH 4 budgets., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)