Search

Behavioral transparency for Internet-of-Things (IoT) networked assets involves two distinct yet interconnected tasks: (a) characterizing device types by discerning the patterns exhibited in their network traffic, and (b) assessing vulnerabilities they introduce to the network. While identifying communication protocols, particularly at the application layer, plays a vital role in effective network management, current methods are, at best, ad-hoc. Accurate protocol identification and attribute extraction from packet payloads are crucial for distinguishing devices and discovering vulnerabilities. This paper makes three contributions: (1) We process a public dataset to construct specific packet traces pertinent to six standard protocols (TLS, HTTP, DNS, NTP, DHCP, and SSDP) of ten commercial IoT devices. We manually analyze TLS and HTTP flows, highlighting their characteristics, parameters, and adherence to best practices-we make our data publicly available; (2) We develop a common model to describe protocol signatures that help with the systematic analysis of protocols even when communicated through non-standard port numbers; and, (3) We evaluate the efficacy of our data models for the six protocols, which constitute approximately 97% of our dataset. Our data models, except for SSDP in 0.3% of Amazon Echo's flows, produce no false positives for protocol detection. We draw insights into how various IoT devices behave across those protocols by applying these models to our IoT traces., Comment: 8 pages, 3 figures, 2 tables, A short version of this article submitted to IEEE WoWMoM workshop on Smart Computing for Smart Cities (SC2) 2024, Perth, Australia, For traffic traces and models https://github.com/savinduwannigama/ProtoIoT

IoT networks are increasingly becoming target of sophisticated new cyber-attacks. Anomaly-based detection methods are promising in finding new attacks, but there are certain practical challenges like false-positive alarms, hard to explain, and difficult to scale cost-effectively. The IETF recent standard called Manufacturer Usage Description (MUD) seems promising to limit the attack surface on IoT devices by formally specifying their intended network behavior. In this paper, we use SDN to enforce and monitor the expected behaviors of each IoT device, and train one-class classifier models to detect volumetric attacks. Our specific contributions are fourfold. (1) We develop a multi-level inferencing model to dynamically detect anomalous patterns in network activity of MUD-compliant traffic flows via SDN telemetry, followed by packet inspection of anomalous flows. This provides enhanced fine-grained visibility into distributed and direct attacks, allowing us to precisely isolate volumetric attacks with microflow (5-tuple) resolution. (2) We collect traffic traces (benign and a variety of volumetric attacks) from network behavior of IoT devices in our lab, generate labeled datasets, and make them available to the public. (3) We prototype a full working system (modules are released as open-source), demonstrates its efficacy in detecting volumetric attacks on several consumer IoT devices with high accuracy while maintaining low false positives, and provides insights into cost and performance of our system. (4) We demonstrate how our models scale in environments with a large number of connected IoTs (with datasets collected from a network of IP cameras in our university campus) by considering various training strategies (per device unit versus per device type), and balancing the accuracy of prediction against the cost of models in terms of size and training time., Comment: 18 pages, 13 figures

IoT devices are increasingly utilized in critical infrastructure, enterprises, and households. There are several sophisticated cyber-attacks that have been reported and many networks have proven vulnerable to both active and passive attacks by leaking private information, allowing unauthorized access, and being open to denial of service attacks. This paper aims firstly, to assist network operators to understand the need for an IoT network security solution, and then secondly, to survey IoT network attack vectors, cyber threats, and countermeasures with a focus on improving the robustness of existing security solutions. Our first contribution highlights viewpoints on IoT security from the perspective of stakeholders such as manufacturers, service providers, consumers, and authorities. We discuss the differences between IoT and IT systems, the need for IoT security solutions, and we highlight the key components required for IoT network security system architecture. For our second contribution, we survey the types of IoT attacks by grouping them based on their impact. We discuss various attack techniques, threats, and shortfalls of existing countermeasures with an intention to enable future research into improving IoT network security., Comment: 13 pages, 2 figures

IoT devices are increasingly being implicated in cyber-attacks, raising community concern about the risks they pose to critical infrastructure, corporations, and citizens. In order to reduce this risk, the IETF is pushing IoT vendors to develop formal specifications of the intended purpose of their IoT devices, in the form of a Manufacturer Usage Description (MUD), so that their network behavior in any operating environment can be locked down and verified rigorously. This paper aims to assist IoT manufacturers in developing and verifying MUD profiles, while also helping adopters of these devices to ensure they are compatible with their organizational policies and track devices network behavior based on their MUD profile. Our first contribution is to develop a tool that takes the traffic trace of an arbitrary IoT device as input and automatically generates the MUD profile for it. We contribute our tool as open source, apply it to 28 consumer IoT devices, and highlight insights and challenges encountered in the process. Our second contribution is to apply a formal semantic framework that not only validates a given MUD profile for consistency, but also checks its compatibility with a given organizational policy. We apply our framework to representative organizations and selected devices, to demonstrate how MUD can reduce the effort needed for IoT acceptance testing. Finally, we show how operators can dynamically identify IoT devices using known MUD profiles and monitor their behavioral changes on their network., Comment: 17 pages, 17 figures. arXiv admin note: text overlap with arXiv:1804.04358

IoT devices are increasingly being implicated in cyber-attacks, driving community concern about the risks they pose to critical infrastructure, corporations, and citizens. In order to reduce this risk, the IETF is pushing IoT vendors to develop formal specifications of the intended purpose of their IoT devices, in the form of a Manufacturer Usage Description (MUD), so that their network behavior in any operating environment can be locked down and verified rigorously. This paper aims to assist IoT manufacturers in developing and verifying MUD profiles, while also helping adopters of these devices to ensure they are compatible with their organizational policies. Our first contribution is to develop a tool that takes the traffic trace of an arbitrary IoT device as input and automatically generates a MUD profile for it. We contribute our tool as open source, apply it to 28 consumer IoT devices, and highlight insights and challenges encountered in the process. Our second contribution is to apply a formal semantic framework that not only validates a given MUD profile for consistency, but also checks its compatibility with a given organizational policy. Finally, we apply our framework to representative organizations and selected devices, to demonstrate how MUD can reduce the effort needed for IoT acceptance testing.