Search

Background: Current symptom management approaches for patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) focus on addressing heart rhythm and do not include management of behavioral or emotional contributors to symptom manifestation or severity. Objective: To inform content development of a digitally delivered AF symptom self-management program by exploring patients’ experiences of the impact of AF symptoms and their perspectives on behavioral approaches to symptom management. Methods: This was a qualitative study of 3 focus groups composed of adults living with symptomatic AF. Group transcripts underwent thematic content analysis to identify themes and subthemes. Themes were matched to available self-management strategies that could be adapted for use in a digitally delivered AF symptom self-management program. Results: Six major themes (with subthemes) were identified: symptoms (anxiety, fatigue, stress/other negative emotions, AF-specific symptoms, heart rhythm); social aspects (social impact, social support); AF treatments (medication, procedures); health behaviors (sleep, physical activity, hydration, breathing/mindfulness/relaxation); positive emotions; and AF education and information gathering. Symptom self-management strategies were identified that could be used to address these symptom-related themes. Conclusion: Patients with AF reported a wide range of emotional, physical, and social impacts of the condition. They endorsed attempts to self-manage symptoms and an interest in learning more about how to effectively self-manage. Findings indicate the potential for a digital self-management program to address existing gaps in AF symptom–related care.

This collaborative statement from the Digital Health Committee of the Heart Rhythm Society provides everyday clinical scenarios in which wearables may be utilized by patients for cardiovascular health and arrhythmia management. We describe herein the spectrum of wearables that are commercially available for patients, and their benefits, shortcomings and areas for technological improvement. Although wearables for rhythm diagnosis and management have not been examined in large randomized clinical trials, undoubtedly the usage of wearables has quickly escalated in clinical practice. This document is the first of a planned series in which we will update information on wearables as they are revised and released to consumers.

Background: Many digital health technologies capable of atrial fibrillation (AF) detection are directly available to patients. However, adaptation into clinical practice by heart rhythm healthcare practitioners (HCPs) is unclear. Objective: To examine HCP perspectives on use of commercial technologies for AF detection and management. Methods: We created an electronic survey for HCPs assessing practice demographics and perspectives on digital devices for AF detection and management. The survey was distributed electronically to all members of 3 heart rhythm professional societies. Results: We received 1601 responses out of 73,563 e-mails sent, with 43.6% from cardiac electrophysiologists, 12.8% from fellows, and 11.6% from advanced practice practitioners. Most respondents (62.3%) reported having recommended patient use of a digital device for AF detection. Those who did not had concerns about their accuracy (29.6%), clinical utility of results (22.8%), and integration into electronic health records (19.8%). Results from a 30-second single-lead electrocardiogram were sufficient for 42.7% of HCPs to recommend oral anticoagulation for patients at high risk for stroke. Respondents wanted more data comparing the accuracy of digital devices to conventional devices for AF monitoring (64.9%). A quarter (27.3%) of HCPs had no reservations recommending digital devices for AF detection, and most (53.4%) wanted guidelines from their professional societies providing guidance on their optimal use. Conclusion: Many HCPs have already integrated digital devices into their clinical practice. However, HCPs reported facing challenges when using digital technologies for AF detection, and professional society recommendations on their use are needed.

Atrial fibrillation (AF) usually starts as paroxysmal but can evolve relentlessly to the persistent and permanent forms. However, the mechanisms governing such a transition are unknown. The authors show that intracardiac serum levels of galectin (Gal)-3 are greater in patients with persistent than paroxysmal AF and that Gal-3 independently predicts atrial tachyarrhythmia recurrences after a single ablation procedure. Using a sheep model of persistent AF the authors further demonstrate that upstream therapy targeting Gal-3 diminishes both electrical remodeling and fibrosis by impairing transforming growth factor beta–mediated signaling and reducing myofibroblast activation. Accordingly, Gal-3 inhibition therapy increases the probability of AF termination and reduces the overall burden of AF. Therefore the authors postulate that Gal-3 inhibition is a potential new upstream therapy to prevent AF progression.

Healthcare providers are expected to deliver care improvement solutions that not only provide high quality patient care, but also improve outcomes, reduce costs, ensure safety, and increase patient satisfaction. Human-centered design methodologies, such as design thinking, allow providers to collaboratively ideate solutions with patients and family members. We describe a pilot workshop designed to teach providers the stages of design thinking while working on improving patient-provider communication. Twenty-four providers (physicians, nurses, technical staff, and administrative staff) from multiple cardiovascular units attended the workshop with five former patients and family members from those units. The workshop educated on and guided teams of providers patients and family members through the stages of design thinking (empathy, define, ideate, prototype, test). Pre- and post-event assessments indicated an increase in knowledge of the design thinking methodology and participants’ ability to apply it to a clinical problem. We also present recommendations for designing a successful design thinking workshop.