Search

Objective: To investigate the prevalence of diabetes retinopathy and evaluate the factors influencing its occurrence both at the onset of type 2 diabetes (T2D) and three years into its duration. Design: Retrospective population-based study. Setting: Data was retrieved from Regional Healthcare Information Platform in Region Halland 2016–2020. Subjects: Patients 35-75 years old in Region Halland receiving first-time diabetes diagnosis according to ICD-code E11-14 in 2016–17. The total cohort consisted of 1659 patients. Main outcome measures: The main outcome measure of the study was the occurrence of diabetes retinopathy at onset and within three years from the diabetes diagnosis. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was conducted for diabetes retinopathy at onset and within three years, adjusted for age, gender, comorbidities, levels of HbA1c, cholesterol, kidney functional and blood pressure. Results: At onset, there were 12% with diabetes retinopathy and after three years, 32% of the patients had developed diabetes retinopathy. In the study cohort, 71 of patients who were examined with fundus photography within three years after onset, and 8% had had dietary recommendation without pharmacotherapy. High HbA1c levels, blood pressure values and impaired renal function already at onset were associated with development of diabetes retinopathy at onset and this association persisted after three years. The odds ratio for diabetes retinopathy was increased adjusted for HbA1c elevations, renal impairment, and increased blood pressure at index and when adjusted for these variables three years from index. Conclusion: These findings indicate that the risk of developing diabetes retinopathy is present early on at onset and within the first three years of diabetes diagnosis. This highlights the importance of promptly regulating glucose- and blood-pressure levels and follow up kidney dysfunction to mitigate the risk of diabetes retinopathy. KEY POINTS: Among patients with type 2 diabetes, 12% had developed diabetes retinopathy already at onset. Among patients with type 2 diabetes, one-third had developed diabetes retinopathy after three years from onset. The presence of diabetes retinopathy already at diabetes onset, was associated with elevated HbA1c levels, renal impairment and elevated blood pressure. Diabetes retinopathy three years after the onset of the disease, was associated with increased HbA1c levels, high blood pressure, and renal dysfunction. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This Swedish study aimed to assess the prevalence, associated clinical factors, and mortality rates of heart failure patients diagnosed without echocardiograms in both hospital and primary care settings. We conducted a retrospective population-based study using data from the Region Halland healthcare database in Sweden covering 330,000 residents. From 2013–2019, 3,903 patients received an incidental heart failure diagnosis without an echocardiogram and they were followed for one year. Using logistic and Cox regression analyses, we evaluated the prevalence, clinical characteristics, and all-cause mortality at intervals of 30, 100, and 365 days post-diagnosis. In this Swedish cohort, the one-year all-cause mortality rate was markedly higher for patients diagnosed in hospitals (42%) compared to those in primary care (20%, p < 0.001). Patients diagnosed in primary care were older and had fewer comorbidities and lower NT-proBNP levels. Hospital-diagnosed patients faced a significantly higher mortality rate in the initial 30 days but saw similar rates to primary care patients thereafter. In a Swedish region, heart failure diagnoses without echocardiograms were more common in hospitals, and these patients initially faced worse prognoses. After the first month, however, the prognosis of hospital-diagnosed patients mirrored that of those diagnosed in primary care. These findings emphasize the need for improved diagnostic and treatment approaches in both care settings to enhance outcomes. In a Swedish study, 58% of heart failure patients diagnosed without an echocardiogram were identified in a hospital setting. Patients diagnosed in primary care were generally older with fewer comorbidities and lower NT-proBNP levels. The first-year post-diagnosis mortality rate was higher for patients diagnosed in hospitals (42%) compared to those diagnosed in primary care (20%). Despite a higher initial mortality for hospital-diagnosed patients, the rates became comparable with primary care diagnoses after the first month. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

To explore how cancer survivors have experienced their contacts with primary care after being diagnosed with cancer, focusing on the integration between cancer specialist and primary care, and participants' views on what could make primary care services better at catering to the needs of cancer survivors. A qualitative study in which data was collected through semi-structured digital focus group interviews and analyzed using a template analysis approach. Adult residents of Skåne, Sweden, who had been diagnosed with and initiated treatment for either of five common cancer forms, recruited through patient advocacy groups. A qualitative description of participants' experiences and perceptions as expressed in focus group interview data. Most participants felt that primary care services had not played a significant role for them, despite patterns of both increased and unmet health needs. Insufficient coordination and communication with specialist cancer care, low availability, lacking personal continuity, low cancer competence and lacking commitment to cancer-related needs were presented as barriers to satisfactory primary care. A strengthened bond between cancer and primary care services, privileged access, and holistic perspectives were all suggested as measures to make primary care more suitable to cancer survivors' needs. The study suggests that cancer survivors experience a range of issues that hinders primary care services from playing a productive role in the cancer care process. The results speak for a need for interventions to remove barriers to satisfactory primary care contacts in this group of patients. The growing number of cancer survivors highlights the role of primary care services in the cancer care continuum. Despite the presence of unmet needs, few cancer survivors felt that primary care services had been significant to their care. Survivors identified a number of barriers to satisfactory primary care, including lacking coordination and communication between cancer and primary care. Strengthened links between healthcare services, privileged access, and holistic perspectives were suggested to improve primary care delivery for cancer survivors. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Background There is a great variability in licit prescription drug use in the population and among patients. Factors other than purely medical ones have proven to be of importance for the prescribing of licit drugs. For example, individuals with a high age, female gender and low socioeconomic status are more likely to use licit prescription drugs. However, these results have not been adjusted for multi-morbidity level. In this study we investigate the odds of using licit prescription drugs among individuals in the population and the rate of licit prescription drug use among patients depending on gender, age and socioeconomic status after adjustment for multi-morbidity level. Methods The study was carried out on the total population aged 20 years or older in Östergötland county with about 400 000 inhabitants in year 2006. The Johns Hopkins ACG Case-mix was used as a proxy for the individual level of multi-morbidity in the population to which we have related the odds ratio for individuals and incidence rate ratio (IRR) for patients of using licit prescription drugs, defined daily doses (DDDs) and total costs of licit prescription drugs after adjusting for age, gender and socioeconomic factors (educational and income level). Results After adjustment for multi-morbidity level male individuals had less than half the odds of using licit prescription drugs (OR 0.41 (95% CI 0.40-0.42)) compared to female individuals. Among the patients, males had higher total costs (IRR 1.14 (95% CI 1.13-1.15)). Individuals above 80 years had nine times the odds of using licit prescription drugs (OR 9.09 (95% CI 8.33-10.00)) despite adjustment for multi-morbidity. Patients in the highest education and income level had the lowest DDDs (IRR 0.78 (95% CI 0.76-0.80), IRR 0.73 (95% CI 0.71-0.74)) after adjustment for multi-morbidity level. Conclusions This paper shows that there is a great variability in licit prescription drug use associated with gender, age and socioeconomic status, which is not dependent on level of multi-morbidity.

Abstract Background Adequate resource allocation is an important factor to ensure equity in health care. Previous reimbursement models have been based on age, gender and socioeconomic factors. An explanatory model based on individual need of primary health care (PHC) has not yet been used in Sweden to allocate resources. The aim of this study was to examine to what extent the ACG case-mix system could explain concurrent costs in Swedish PHC. Methods Diagnoses were obtained from electronic PHC records of inhabitants in Blekinge County (approx. 150,000) listed with public PHC (approx. 120,000) for three consecutive years, 2004-2006. The inhabitants were then classified into six different resource utilization bands (RUB) using the ACG case-mix system. The mean costs for primary health care were calculated for each RUB and year. Using linear regression models and log-cost as dependent variable the adjusted R2 was calculated in the unadjusted model (gender) and in consecutive models where age, listing with specific PHC and RUB were added. In an additional model the ACG groups were added. Results Gender, age and listing with specific PHC explained 14.48-14.88% of the variance in individual costs for PHC. By also adding information on level of co-morbidity, as measured by the ACG case-mix system, to specific PHC the adjusted R2 increased to 60.89-63.41%. Conclusion The ACG case-mix system explains patient costs in primary care to a high degree. Age and gender are important explanatory factors, but most of the variance in concurrent patient costs was explained by the ACG case-mix system.

Abstract Background Lithuanian primary health care (PHC) is undergoing changes from the systems prevalent under the Soviet Union, which ensured free access to specialised health care. Currently four different PHC models work in parallel, which offers the opportunity to study their respective effect on referral rates. Our aim was to investigate whether there were differences in referrals rates from different Lithuanian PHC models in Klaipeda after adjustment for co-morbidity. Methods The population listed with 18 PHC practices serving inhabitants in Klaipeda city and region (250 070 inhabitants). Four PHC models: rural state-owned family medicine practices, urban privately owned family medicine practices, state-owned polyclinics and privately owned polyclinics. Information on listed patients and referrals during 2005 from each PHC practice in Klaipeda was obtained from the Lithuanian State Sickness Fund database. The database records included information on age, gender, PHC model, referrals and ICD 10 diagnoses. The Johns Hopkins ACG Case-Mix system was used to study co-morbidity. Referral rates from different PHC models were studied using Poisson regression models. Results Patients listed with rural state-owned family medicine practices had a significantly lower referral rate to specialised health care than those in the other three PHC models. An increasing co-morbidity level correlated with a higher physician- to self-referral ratio. Conclusion Family medicine practices located in rural-, but not in urban areas had significantly lower referral rates to specialised health care. It could not be established whether this was due to organisation, training of physicians or financing, but suggests there is room for improving primary health care in urban areas. Patient's place of residence and co morbidity level were the most important factors for referral rate. We also found that gatekeeping had an effect on the referral pattern with respect to co-morbidity level, so that those with a physician referral were more likely to have had higher co-morbidity.

Abstract Background Individualbased measures for comorbidity are of increasing importance for planning and funding health care services. No measurement for individualbased healthcare costs exist in Sweden. The aim of this study was to validate the Johns Hopkins ACG Case-Mix System's predictive value of polypharmacy (regular use of 4 or more prescription medicines) used as a proxy for health care costs in an elderly population and to study if the prediction could be improved by adding variables from a population based study i.e. level of education, functional status indicators and health perception. Methods The Johns Hopkins ACG Case-Mix System was applied to primary health care diagnoses of 1402 participants (60–96 years) in a cross-sectional community based study in Karlskrona, Sweden (the Swedish National study on Ageing and Care) during a period of two years before they took part in the study. The predictive value of the Johns Hopkins ACG Case-Mix System was modeled against the regular use of 4 or more prescription medicines, also using age, sex, level of education, instrumental activity of daily living- and measures of health perception as covariates. Results In an exploratory biplot analysis the Johns Hopkins ACG Case-Mix System, was shown to explain a large part of the variance for regular use of 4 or more prescription medicines. The sensitivity of the prediction was 31.9%, whereas the specificity was 88.5%, when the Johns Hopkins ACG Case-Mix System was adjusted for age. By adding covariates to the model the sensitivity was increased to 46.3%, with a specificity of 90.1%. This increased the number of correctly classified by 5.6% and the area under the curve by 11.1%. Conclusion The Johns Hopkins ACG Case-Mix System is an important factor in measuring comorbidity, however it does not reflect an individual's capability to function despite a disease burden, which has importance for prediction of comorbidity. In this study we have shown that information on such factors, which can be obtained from short questionnaires increases the probability to correctly predict an individual's use of resources, such as medications.