Search

Concurrent hearing and genetic screening of newborns is expected to play important roles not only in early detection and diagnosis of congenital deafness, which triggers intervention, but also in predicting late-onset and progressive hearing loss and identifying individuals who are at risk of drug-induced HL. Concurrent hearing and genetic screening in the whole newborn population in Beijing was launched in January 2012. This study included 180,469 infants born in Beijing between April 2013 and March 2014, with last follow-up on February 24, 2018. Hearing screening was performed using transiently evoked otoacoustic emission (TEOAE) and automated auditory brainstem response (AABR). For genetic testing, dried blood spots were collected and nine variants in four genes, GJB2, SLC26A4, mtDNA 12S rRNA, and GJB3, were screened using a DNA microarray platform. Of the 180,469 infants, 1,915 (1.061%) were referred bilaterally or unilaterally for hearing screening; 8,136 (4.508%) were positive for genetic screening (heterozygote, homozygote, or compound heterozygote and mtDNA homoplasmy or heteroplasmy), among whom 7,896 (4.375%) passed hearing screening. Forty (0.022%) infants carried two variants in GJB2 or SLC26A4 (homozygote or compound heterozygote) and 10 of those infants passed newborn hearing screening. In total, 409 (0.227%) infants carried the mtDNA 12S rRNA variant (m.1555A>G or m.1494C>T), and 405 of them passed newborn hearing screening. In this cohort study, 25% of infants with pathogenic combinations of GJB2 or SLC26A4 variants and 99% of infants with an m.1555A>G or m.1494C>T variant passed routine newborn hearing screening, indicating that concurrent screening provides a more comprehensive approach for management of congenital deafness and prevention of ototoxicity.

Drops impacting on a flat solid surface will spread until it reaches maximum contact with the substrate underneath. After that, it recoils. In the present work, the variations of energy components during the spreading are studied carefully, including kinetic, capillary, and dissipated energies. Our experimental and numerical results show that, when the impact speed is low, the fast slipping of the contact line (in inertia-capillary regime) and corresponding “interface relaxation” lead to extra dissipation. An auxiliary dissipation is therefore introduced into the traditional theoretical model. The energy components predicted by the improved model agree with the experimental and numerical results very well. As the impact speed increases (the Weber number, We=ρD0V02/γ, becomes larger than 40 in the present work), the dissipation induced by the initial velocity plays more important roles. The analyses also indicate that on the hydrophobic surfaces the auxiliary dissipation is lower than that on hydrophilic o...