Search

Objective: The objective of this Phase 2, open-label, multicenter study is to investigate the antitumor activity of navicixizumab monotherapy or in combination with chemotherapy in patients with advanced solid tumors. Cohort C will enroll triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) patients. Background: Navicixizumab is a bispecific humanized monoclonal immunoglobulin G2 kappa antibody directed against human delta-like ligand 4, a critical ligand of the NOTCH pathway, and human vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). Aberrant NOTCH signaling is associated with chemotherapy resistance, tumor plasticity, enhanced metastatic potential, promotion of a cancer stem cell phenotype, and immune evasion. In TNBC, aberrant NOTCH expression is associated with poor prognosis, making targeting of this pathway an attractive therapeutic strategy. Additionally, NOTCH may mediate resistance to angiogenesis inhibition. While VEGF inhibitors are approved for the treatment of multiple solid tumors, observed anti-tumor activity is limited in breast cancer. Pre-clinical data show that co-inhibition of NOTCH and angiogenesis have superior antitumor activity compared to individual pathway targeting. We postulate that navicixizumab will demonstrate anticancer efficacy against TNBC. Methods: Eligible TNBC patients will have locally advanced or metastatic disease and have received at least 2 and no more than 4 prior lines of standard therapy for metastatic disease, including immunotherapy (for PD-L1 positive TNBC patients), and sacituzumab govitecan. TNBC is defined as ER and PR < 1%, and HER2-negative (IHC 0, 1+, or 2+ and negative fluorescence in situ hybridization [FISH]). Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue from an archival or a core tumor sample must be available for biomarker analysis. Samples will be tested using Oncomap™ ExTra with the Xerna TME Panel™ to classify patient samples into one of four tumor microenvironment (TME) subtypes based on angiogenic and immune gene expression signatures. Up to 30 patients will be enrolled to each TNBC cohort from approximately 8 sites in the US and will receive 3 mg/kg navicixizumab alone (Cohort C1) or in combination with paclitaxel (80 mg/m2 on Days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-day cycle) (Cohort C2). Patients will have radiologic tumor assessments every 8 weeks and will continue to receive treatment until disease progression per RECIST v1.1 (as assessed by the investigator), unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, another protocol-defined discontinuation criterion is met, or the sponsor terminates the study, whichever occurs first. The primary endpoints of the study are objective response rate (ORR) and progression-free survival (PFS). The historical benchmarks for this patient population are estimated at an ORR of < 5% and a 20% PFS rate at 4 months, with targets of 15% and 40% respectively considered promising for this study. Interim efficacy assessments will be at 10-patient increments following the time patients have had at least 1 post-baseline scan. Cohort continuation and future evaluation decisions will be guided by the boundaries identified by a sequential monitoring procedure. Secondary efficacy endpoints include overall survival, time to response, disease control rate, duration of response, and the relationship between antitumor activity of navicixizumab and Xerna TME Panel™ biomarker subtypes. Citation Format: Amelia B. Zelnak, Heinz-Josef Lenz, Kerry Culm, Lukas Makris, Valerie Chamberlain Santos, Hagop Youssoufian, Colleen Mockbee, Kathy D. Miller. ONCX-NAV-G201: A phase 2, basket study of navicixizumab monotherapy or in combination with chemotherapy in patients with select advanced solid tumors: Triple-negative breast cancer cohort (trial in progress) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr OT2-16-01.

PURPOSE This phase Ib study evaluated the safety and efficacy of paclitaxel plus navicixizumab, a bispecific antiangiogenic antibody to vascular endothelial growth factor and delta-like ligand 4, against platinum-resistant ovarian cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS This open-label, nonrandomized, dose-escalation and -expansion study included 44 patients with previously treated, recurrent, platinum-resistant grade 2/3 ovarian cancer. Treatment was intravenous navicixizumab (3 mg/kg or 4 mg/kg once every 2 weeks) plus paclitaxel (80 mg/m2 intravenously on days 0, 7, and 14 of 28-day cycles). The primary and secondary objectives were to evaluate the safety and efficacy of navicixizumab plus paclitaxel. An RNA-based diagnostic panel was retrospectively used to test the hypothesis that tumors with high angiogenesis or immune-suppressed tumor microenvironment (TME) subtypes (biomarker-positive) are more likely to respond to navicixizumab than those with immune-active/-desert TME subtypes (biomarker-negative). RNA expression was analyzed in available pretreatment tumor tissue to classify 33 patients' TME subtypes, and TME panel findings were correlated with tumor response. RESULTS The dose-escalation cohorts enrolled patients at navicixizumab doses of 3 mg/kg once every 2 weeks (n = 3) and 4 mg/kg once every 2 weeks (n = 2); 3 mg/kg was selected for expansion (n = 39). No dose-limiting toxicities occurred. The most common grade 3/4 treatment-related adverse events were hypertension (40.9%), neutropenia (6.8%), and thrombocytopenia (4.5%). Pulmonary hypertension occurred in 18.2% (grade 1-2). The overall objective response rate was 43.2% (95% CI, 28.3 to 59.0): 33.3% (95% CI, 17.3 to 52.8) in patients previously treated with bevacizumab, 64.3% (95% CI, 35.1 to 87.2) in bevacizumab-naive patients, and 62% (95% CI, 31.6 to 86.1) in biomarker-positive patients. The median duration of response was 6 months (95% CI, 5.4 months to not estimable). CONCLUSION Navicixizumab plus paclitaxel demonstrated promising clinical activity in bevacizumab-treated and -naive patients with platinum-resistant ovarian cancer, with manageable toxicity.

Supplementary Data from Anti–Transforming Growth Factor β Receptor II Antibody Has Therapeutic Efficacy against Primary Tumor Growth and Metastasis through Multieffects on Cancer, Stroma, and Immune Cells

The distributions of mRNA gene expression levels IGF-1R, Total IR, IR-A, and IR-B

Supplemental Section for Resubmission - Clean Version

Figure S2C displays probability of progression-free survival over time in subgroups of patients with and without bulky disease

Purpose:In the phase III DUO trial, duvelisib, an oral dual PI3K-δ,γ inhibitor, demonstrated significantly improved efficacy versus ofatumumab [median (m) progression-free survival (PFS), 13.3 vs. 9.9 months (HR, 0.52; P < 0.0001); overall response rate [ORR], 74% vs. 45% (P < 0.0001)], with a manageable safety profile in patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL)/small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL). We report results from patients with progressive disease (PD) after ofatumumab who crossed over to duvelisib in the DUO trial.Patients and Methods:Patients with radiographically confirmed PD after ofatumumab received duvelisib 25 mg twice daily in 28-day cycles until PD, intolerance, death, or study withdrawal. The primary endpoint was ORR per investigator. Secondary endpoints included duration of response (DOR), PFS, and safety.Results:As of December 14, 2018, 90 ofatumumab-treated patients in the DUO trial prior to crossover had an ORR of 29%, mDOR of 10.4 months, and mPFS of 9.4 months. After crossover, 77% of patients (69/90) achieved a response, with an mDOR of 14.9 months and mPFS of 15.7 months. Patients with del(17p) and/or TP53 mutations had similar outcomes [ORR, 77% (20/26); mPFS, 14.7 months]. Notably, 73% of patients (47/64) with disease previously refractory to ofatumumab achieved a response. The most frequent any-grade/grade 3/4 treatment-emergent adverse events were diarrhea (47%/23%), neutropenia (26%/23%), pyrexia (24%/4%), cutaneous reactions (23%/4%), and thrombocytopenia (10%/6%).Conclusions:Duvelisib demonstrated high response rates with good durability and a manageable safety profile in patients with R/R CLL/SLL who progressed on ofatumumab, including patients with high-risk disease and disease previously refractory to ofatumumab.

Figure S2 displays a graph of the plasma concentrations of total docetaxel for patients dosed with 60/mg/m2 of BIND-014 on the Q3W schedule.

Supplemental Figure Legend

Supplementary Figure from Safety and Activity of PolyPEPI1018 Combined with Maintenance Therapy in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: an Open-Label, Multicenter, Phase Ib Study

Purpose: This phase II trial evaluated the efficacy and safety of cixutumumab, a human anti–insulin-like growth factor receptor 1 (IGF-1R) monoclonal IgG1 antibody, and explored potential biomarkers in postmenopausal women with hormone receptor–positive breast cancer.Experimental Design: Patients with hormone receptor–positive breast cancer that progressed on antiestrogen therapy received (2:1 randomization) cixutumumab 10 mg/kg and the same antiestrogen (arm A) or cixutumumab alone (arm B) every 2 weeks (q2w). Primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS); secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS) and safety. Correlative analyses of IGF-1R, total insulin receptor (IR), and IR isoforms A (IR-A) and B (IR-B) expression in tumor tissue were explored.Results: Ninety-three patients were randomized (arm A, n = 62; arm B, n = 31). Median PFS was 2.0 and 3.1 months for arm A and arm B, respectively. Secondary efficacy measures were similar between the arms. Overall, cixutumumab was well tolerated. IGF-1R expression was not associated with clinical outcomes. Regardless of the treatment, lower IR-A, IR-B, and total IR mRNA expression in tumor tissue was significantly associated with longer PFS [IR-A: HR, 2.62 (P = 0.0062); IR-B: HR, 2.21 (P = 0.0202); and total IR: HR, 2.18 (P = 0.0230)] and OS [IR-A: HR, 2.94 (P = 0.0156); IR-B: HR, 2.69 (P = 0.0245); and total IR: HR, 2.72 (P = 0.0231)].Conclusions: Cixutumumab (10 mg/kg) with or without antiestrogen q2w had an acceptable safety profile, but no significant clinical efficacy. Patients with low total IR, IR-A, and IR-B mRNA expression levels had significantly longer PFS and OS, independent of the treatment. The prognostic or predictive value of IR as a biomarker for IGF-1R–targeted therapies requires further validation. Clin Cancer Res; 22(2); 301–9. ©2015 AACR.

Supplementary Figure Legends for Figures S1 and S2

Kaplan-Meier curves of PFS and OS in pooled group and arm A dichotomized by insulin receptor-A (IR-A) expression (high vs. low) using the 75th percentile of marker distribution as cutpoint.

Purpose: First-in-human phase I trial to determine the safety, pharmacokinetics, and antitumor activity of BIND-014, a novel, tumor prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)–targeted nanoparticle, containing docetaxel.Experimental Design: Patients with advanced solid tumors received BIND-014 every three weeks (n = 28) or weekly (n = 27), with dose levels ranging from 3.5 to 75 mg/m2 and 15 to 45 mg/m2, respectively.Results: BIND-014 was generally well tolerated, with no unexpected toxicities. The most common drug-related toxicities (>20% of patients) on either schedule included neutropenia, fatigue, anemia, alopecia, and diarrhea. BIND-014 demonstrated a dose-linear pharmacokinetic profile, distinct from docetaxel, with prolonged persistence of docetaxel-encapsulated circulating nanoparticles. Of the 52 patients evaluable for response, one had a complete response (cervical cancer on the every three week schedule) and five had partial responses (ampullary adenocarcinoma, non–small cell lung, and prostate cancers on the every-three-week schedule, and breast and gastroesophageal cancers on the weekly schedule). Responses were noted in both PSMA-detectable and -undetectable tumors.Conclusions: BIND-014 was generally well tolerated, with predictable and manageable toxicity and a unique pharmacokinetic profile compared with conventional docetaxel. Clinical activity was noted in multiple tumor types. The recommended phase II dose of BIND-014 is 60 mg/m2 every three weeks or 40 mg/m2 weekly. Clin Cancer Res; 22(13); 3157–63. ©2016 AACR.

Figure S3 displays probability of overall survival over time in the study population

Supplementary Table from Safety and Activity of PolyPEPI1018 Combined with Maintenance Therapy in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: an Open-Label, Multicenter, Phase Ib Study

•Table S1 shows a summary of prior anticancer therapies received by all patients in the study •Table S2 shows best overall response, overall response rate, and duration of response by investigator in the study population of patients while receiving ofatumumab in the parent DUO study before crossover •Table S3 shows rates of all serious TEAEs and individual hematologic and non-hematologic serious TEAEs in {greater than or equal to} 2% of patients in the study population • Table S4 shows rates of all TEAEs leading to death in patients in the study population •Table S5 shows a summary of patient disposition information

Purpose: Transforming growth factor β (TGFβ) is a pleiotropic cytokine that affects tumor growth, metastasis, stroma, and immune response. We investigated the therapeutic efficacy of anti–TGFβ receptor II (TGFβ RII) antibody in controlling metastasis and tumor growth as well as enhancing antitumor immunity in preclinical tumor models.Experimental Design: We generated neutralizing antibodies to TGFβ RII and assessed the antibody effects on cancer, stroma, and immune cells in vitro. The efficacy and mechanism of action of the antibody as monotherapy and in combination with chemotherapy in suppression of primary tumor growth and metastasis were evaluated in several tumor models.Results: Anti–TGFβ RII antibody blocked TGFβ RII binding to TGFβ 1, 2, and 3, and attenuated the TGFβ-mediated activation of downstream Smad2 kinase, invasion of cancer cells, motility of endothelial and fibroblast cells, and induction of immunosuppressive cells. Treatment with the antibody significantly suppressed primary tumor growth and metastasis and enhanced natural killer and CTL activity in tumor-bearing mice. Immunohistochemistry analysis showed cancer cell apoptosis and massive necrosis, and increased tumor-infiltrating T effector cells and decreased tumor-infiltrating Gr-1+ myeloid cells in the antibody-treated tumors. Fluorescence-activated cell sorting analysis indicated the significant reduction of peripheral Gr-1+/CD11b+ myeloid cells in treated animals. Concomitant treatment with the cytotoxic agent cyclophosphamide resulted in a significantly increased antitumor efficacy against primary tumor growth and metastasis.Conclusions: These preclinical data provide a foundation to support using anti–TGFβ RII antibody as a therapeutic agent for TGFβ RII–dependent cancer with metastatic capacity. Clin Cancer Res; 16(4); 1191–205

Figure S1 displays probability of progression-free survival over time in the study population and in the subgroup of patients with del(17p) and/or TP53 mutations that received ofatumumab while participating in the parent DUO study before crossover

Purpose:Although chemotherapy is standard of care for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), immunotherapy has no role in microsatellite stable (MSS) mCRC, a “cold” tumor. PolyPEPI1018 is an off-the-shelf, multi-peptide vaccine derived from 7 tumor-associated antigens (TAA) frequently expressed in mCRC. This study assessed PolyPEPI1018 combined with first-line maintenance therapy in patients with MSS mCRC.Patients and Methods:Eleven patients with MSS mCRC received PolyPEPI1018 and Montanide ISA51VG adjuvant subcutaneously, combined with fluoropyrimidine/biologic following first-line induction with chemotherapy and a biologic (NCT03391232). In Part A of the study, 5 patients received a single dose; in Part B, 6 patients received up to three doses of PolyPEPI1018 every 12 weeks. The primary objective was safety; secondary objectives were preliminary efficacy, immunogenicity at peripheral and tumor level, and immune correlates.Results:PolyPEPI1018 vaccination was safe and well tolerated. No vaccine-related serious adverse event occurred. Eighty percent of patients had CD8+ T-cell responses against ≥3 TAAs. Increased density of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes were detected post-treatment for 3 of 4 patients’ liver biopsies, combined with increased expression of immune-related gene signatures. Three patients had objective response according to RECISTv1.1, and 2 patients qualified for curative surgery. Longer median progression-free survival for patients receiving multiple doses compared with a single dose (12.5 vs. 4.6 months; P = 0.017) suggested a dose–efficacy correlation. The host HLA genotype predicted multi-antigen–specific T-cell responses (P = 0.01) indicative of clinical outcome.Conclusions:PolyPEPI1018 added to maintenance chemotherapy for patients with unresectable, MSS mCRC was safe and associated with specific immune responses and antitumor activity warranting further confirmation in a randomized, controlled setting.

Background: Triple Negative Breast Cancer (TNBC) represents approximately 15% of all breast cancer. It confers a poorer prognosis relative to the other breast cancer subtypes, with an increased likelihood of recurrence and death within 5 years of diagnosis. There is no standard of care specifically for patients presenting with TNBC. Altered amino acid metabolism have been shown to play a role in TNBC. Eryaspase, asparaginase (ASNase) encapsulated in red blood cells (RBCs) is an investigational product under development. Following infusion, asparagine and glutamine are actively transported into RBCs where they are hydrolyzed by the encapsulated ASNase. In a recent randomized Phase 2b study, eryaspase has demonstrated evidence of improved overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS) and acceptable safety when combined with gemcitabine or FOLFOX therapy in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer whose disease progressed following first-line treatment (NCT02195180). The demonstration of ASNase activity of eryaspase in combination with chemotherapy including DNA-damaging agents in both preclinical and clinical settings provide a rationale to further test combination in TNBC. Methods: TRYbeCA-2 is an international, randomized, open-label Phase 2/3 trial (N=64 for Phase 2) of eryaspase combined with chemotherapy in patients with locally recurrent or metastatic TNBC who have not received prior systemic therapy for locally recurrent or metastatic disease. Patients are randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive gemcitabine/carboplatin with or without eryaspase, administered as IV infusion on Day 1 and Day 8 of each 3-week cycle. Key eligibility criteria include measurable lesion(s), performance status 0 or 1, and adequate organ function. The primary endpoint is the objective response rate (ORR) as determined by an independent radiological review. Key secondary endpoints include ORR as determined by the investigator’s assessment, clinical benefit rate, overall survival, progression-free survival, safety, biomarker research, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. A steering committee will be established to review safety at regular intervals and to review safety and efficacy data at the end of the Phase 2 to determine whether or not to proceed to Phase 3. The study is planned in European countries. Several sites have already been initiated and at least one patient was enrolled at the time of submitting this abstract. Citation Format: Ahmad Awada, Javier Cortes, Sarah Slater, Iain MacPherson, Tibor Csoszi, Jean-Baptiste Bertrand, Anne-Sophie Clermont, Rachel Pollard, Romain Chrestia-Blanchine, Nigel Biswas-Baldwin, Hagop Youssoufian, Iman El-Hariry. TRYbeCA-2: A randomized phase 2/3 study of eryaspase in combination with gemcitabine and carboplatin chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone as first-line treatment in patients with metastatic or locally recurrent triple-negative breast cancer (NCT03674242) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2019 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2019 Dec 10-14; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(4 Suppl):Abstract nr OT1-08-02.

Purpose: Although chemotherapy is standard of care for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), immunotherapy has no role in microsatellite stable (MSS) mCRC, a “cold” tumor. PolyPEPI1018 is an off-the-shelf, multi-peptide vaccine derived from 7 tumor-associated antigens (TAA) frequently expressed in mCRC. This study assessed PolyPEPI1018 combined with first-line maintenance therapy in patients with MSS mCRC. Patients and Methods: Eleven patients with MSS mCRC received PolyPEPI1018 and Montanide ISA51VG adjuvant subcutaneously, combined with fluoropyrimidine/biologic following first-line induction with chemotherapy and a biologic (NCT03391232). In Part A of the study, 5 patients received a single dose; in Part B, 6 patients received up to three doses of PolyPEPI1018 every 12 weeks. The primary objective was safety; secondary objectives were preliminary efficacy, immunogenicity at peripheral and tumor level, and immune correlates. Results: PolyPEPI1018 vaccination was safe and well tolerated. No vaccine-related serious adverse event occurred. Eighty percent of patients had CD8+ T-cell responses against ≥3 TAAs. Increased density of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes were detected post-treatment for 3 of 4 patients’ liver biopsies, combined with increased expression of immune-related gene signatures. Three patients had objective response according to RECISTv1.1, and 2 patients qualified for curative surgery. Longer median progression-free survival for patients receiving multiple doses compared with a single dose (12.5 vs. 4.6 months; P = 0.017) suggested a dose–efficacy correlation. The host HLA genotype predicted multi-antigen–specific T-cell responses (P = 0.01) indicative of clinical outcome. Conclusions: PolyPEPI1018 added to maintenance chemotherapy for patients with unresectable, MSS mCRC was safe and associated with specific immune responses and antitumor activity warranting further confirmation in a randomized, controlled setting.

TPS263 Background: The objective of this Phase 2, open-label, multicenter study is to investigate the antitumor activity of navicixizumab monotherapy or in combination with chemotherapy in patients with advanced solid tumors (NCT05453825). Cohort A will enroll colorectal cancer (CRC) patients. Navicixizumab is a bispecific humanized monoclonal immunoglobulin G2 kappa antibody directed against human delta-like ligand 4, a critical ligand of the NOTCH pathway, and human vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). Aggressive CRC remains difficult to treat owing to the aberrant activation of oncogenic signaling pathways including the NOTCH pathway. Preclinical data show that co-inhibition of NOTCH and angiogenesis have superior antitumor activity compared to individual pathway inhibition. We postulate that navicixizumab will demonstrate anticancer efficacy against CRC. Methods: Eligible CRC patients will have locally advanced or metastatic disease and have received at least 2 and no more than 3 prior lines of standard therapy for metastatic disease, including an anti-VEGF monoclonal antibody. Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue from an archival or a core tumor sample must be available for biomarker analysis. Samples will be tested using Oncomap ExTra with the Xerna TME Panel where patient samples will be classified into one of four tumor microenviroment (TME) subtypes based on angiogenic and immune gene expression signatures. Up to 30 patients will be enrolled to each CRC cohort from approximately 8 sites in the US and will receive 3 mg/kg navicixizumab alone (Cohort A1) or in combination with irinotecan (180 mg/m2 on Days 1 and 15 of a 28-day cycle, Cohort A2). Patients will have radiologic tumor assessments every 8 weeks and will continue to receive treatment until disease progression per RECIST v1.1 (as assessed by the investigator), unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, another protocol-defined discontinuation criterion is met, or the sponsor terminates the study, whichever occurs first. The primary endpoints of the study are objective response rate (ORR) and progression-free survival (PFS). The historical benchmarks for this patient population are estimated at an ORR of

TPS283 Background: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is among the top three most commonly occurring cancers globally. CRC is now routinely classified as MSI-high (MSI-H) or microsatellite-stable (MSS) based on the detection or absence of molecular markers of genetic instability, respectively. The efficacy of checkpoint inhibitor immunotherapy in MSI-H CRC has not been replicated in MSS CRC. Therefore, additional interventions are needed to convert immunologically “cold” MSS CRC to “hot” tumors resembling MSI-H tumors. PolyPEPI1018 is an off-the-shelf, multi-peptide vaccine containing 12 immunogenic epitopes derived from 7 cancer testis antigens (CTAs) frequently expressed in patients with CRC. PolyPEPI1018 successfully restored and boosted pre-existing anticancer immunity of MSS mCRC subjects and triggered recruitment and infiltration of cytotoxic T cells into the tumor. In first line metastatic MSS CRC, PolyPEPI1018 in combination with fluoropyrimidine/bevacizumab vaccine was safe and demonstrated early evidence of clinical activity. Therefore, we hypothesized that the combination of PolyPEPI1018 and atezolizumab will convert a “cold” MSS mCRC to a “hot” tumor and may increase the likelihood of inducing favorable antitumor immunity and subsequent clinical benefit. Methods: The study is a phase 2, multicenter, single-arm clinical trial of PolyPEPI1018 vaccine (1.2 mg, sc, every 3 weeks) and atezolizumab (1200 mg, iv, every 3 weeks) for patients with advanced or metastatic MSS CRC who have progressed on 2 or 3 lines of prior standard regimens. 28 patients will be enrolled at 3 US sites with a primary objective to assess the safety and tolerability of multiple doses of PolyPEPI1018 in combination with atezolizumab. Secondary endpoints include objective response rate (ORR) assessed by RECIST v1.1, vaccine induced immunological response rate (IRR), progression-free survival and overall survival. Correlative aims include assessing blood and tissue biomarkers (PD-L1, Immunoscore®IC, ctDNA, clinical tumor markers) for association with clinical benefit. An exploratory study is being conducted for co-development of a companion diagnostic based on HLA-genotype and computational personal epitope (PEPI) prediction test. A Simon 2-stage design will be used for the initial assessment of ORR. If pre-specified activity goal for the first stage of accrual (n = 18) is met, additional 10 participants will be enrolled to the second stage. A formal review of safety will be performed after the initial 6 participants have received at least 2 cycles of study therapy. The study is open with 10 patients enrolled at time of submission. Clinical trial information: NCT05243862 .

e20609 Background: ACSS2 catalyzes the ligation of acetate with Co-enzyme A to generate Acetyl-CoA. Selection to an acetate dependent state has been demonstrated and is associated with the induction of ACSS2 gene expression in certain human cancers. The ACSS2 gene is amplified in human breast cancers, and its expression is up-regulated in human colorectal, breast, ovarian and lung cancers. MTB-9655 is a potent (IC50 = 0.15nM in biochemical, and EC50 = 3nM in cellular assays) oral inhibitor of ACSS2 and induces anti-tumor effects in xenograft mouse models of human colorectal, breast and lung cancers that express high levels of ACSS2. Methods: Using a combined accelerated (single patient for the first two dose levels) and 3+3 dose escalation and dose expansion design, MTB-9655 was administered on a once daily (QD) schedule in 21-day cycles in a Phase 1 trial to assess safety, tolerability, PK and potential anti-tumor activity in patients with advanced solid tumors. Re-staging was performed every 2 cycles. Results: To-date, 10 subjects have received MTB-9655 at doses up to 225mg. MTB-9655 was absorbed rapidly post oral dosing with a half-life of 6-12 hours. Dose proportional exposure was observed on day 1 of the first dosing cycle, and steady-state exposure was noted between day 8 and day 1 of the second dosing cycle. Dose limiting toxicities or Grade 3 treatment-related adverse events (AEs) have not been observed up to the 225mg dose level. The most common AE was nausea (29%). Low grade increase in bilirubin levels was observed in 1 patient at 225mg dose, without changes in other liver enzyme levels. Increased bilirubin levels were readily reversed with dose interruption. As MTB-9655 is a 729nM inhibitor of the UGT1A1 enzyme, the increase in bilirubin levels is likely attributed to off-target UGT1A1 inhibitory activity. Conclusions: MTB-9655 has been well tolerated, and the safety profile was predictable based on preclinical studies in rodents and non-human primates. Dose proportional plasma drug levels were observed and predicted to have reached biologically active levels. Expected increase in bilirubin levels was observed in 1 patient, which may be used as a marker of significant drug exposure. MTD has not reached up to the 225mg dose and the dose escalation is continuing. Development of MTB-9655 is planned as a single agent, and based on animal model studies, in combination with standard of care platinum-based agents and gemcitabine. Clinical trial information: NCT04990739.

581 Background: The prognosis for advanced metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma remains dismal with median survival of 12-15 months in most recent trials, highlighting the urgent need for novel therapeutic agents. mFOLFIRINOX remains the standard of care for the first line treatment of advanced disease, with historical objective response rate (ORR) of ̃31%. Eryaspase, L-asparaginase (ASPNase) encapsulated in red blood cells (RBCs), is an investigational product under development. Following infusion, asparagine is actively transported in RBCs where it is hydrolyzed by encapsulated ASPNase. The reduction in plasma concentration of this essential amino acid leads to cancer cell death. A second line pivotal randomized phase III trial (Trybeca-1), which compares chemotherapy (Gemcitabine + Nab-Paclitaxel or 5-Fluorouracil + Irinotecan) with or without Eryaspase, has completed enrollment with results pending (NCT03665441). Methods: Patients with locally advanced or metastatic biopsy-proven pancreatic adenocarcinoma were treated with the combination of mFOLFIRINOX plus Eryaspase. The design was a standard 3 +3 dose escalation. mFOLFIRINOX was given as 5-Fluorouracil 2400 mg/m2 over 46 hours, Oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2, Irinotecan 150 mg/m2 plus Eryaspase 75 units/kg at dose level 0 or 100 units/kg at dose level 1. Key eligibility criteria include performance status of 0 or 1, locally advanced or metastatic disease, and adequate organ function. The primary objectives were to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and to determine the safety of this combination. Results: To date, nine patients have been enrolled with a mean age of 70. Four patients had locally advanced disease and five had metastatic disease. Three patients were enrolled at dose level 0 and six at dose level 1, with no dose limiting toxicities (DLT). Eight patients have had imaging to evaluate response: the ORR was 50% with four partial responses (PRs); 50% (N = 4) had stable disease (SD); disease control rate (PR + SD) was 100%. There were no grade 4 adverse events (AEs). The most common grade 3 AEs were hypokalemia (33%), fatigue (11%), and hypotension (11%); but they were beyond the DLT period of 28 days. The most common grade 1/2 AEs were neuropathy (78%), elevated liver enzymes (78%), nausea (78%), anemia (66%), fatigue (66%), diarrhea (66%), and mucositis (44%). Conclusions: The novel combination of mFOLFIRINOX plus Eryaspase was well tolerated with no DLT and has encouraging signs of clinical activity. The MTD has been declared with 5-FU 2400 mg/2, Oxaliplatin 85 mg/2, Irinotecan 150 mg/m2, and Eryaspase 100 units/kg. We plan to expand enrollment to further look at efficacy and are in the process of designing a larger randomized study in the first line setting pending results from the Trybeca-1 trial. Clinical trial information: NCT04292743.

518 Background: Eryaspase, asparaginase encapsulated in red blood cells is an investigational product under development. The encapsulated asparaginase induces the degradation of asparagine and glutamine, crucial for cancer cell growth and survival. An earlier Phase 2b study in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer showed an improvement in overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS) with eryaspase plus chemotherapy. Methods: TRYbeCA-1 was a randomized, open-label Phase 3 trial of eryaspase combined with chemotherapy in patients with advanced adenocarcinoma of the pancreas who have progressed on only one prior line of systemic anti-cancer therapy. Patients were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel or irinotecan/fluorouracil (5FU) therapy (depending on first-line received) with or without eryaspase, administered as IV infusion on Day 1 and Day 15 of each 4-week cycle. Key eligibility criteria included progression on or following first-line systemic treatment, ECOG performance status 0 or 1, stage III-IV disease, documented evidence of disease progression, available tumor tissue and adequate organ function. The primary endpoint was OS. A total of 412 events were required for 90% power to detect a treatment effect hazard ratio (HR) of 0.725 at a two-sided significance level of 5%. Results: A total of 512 patients were included. Baseline characteristics were well balanced between the treatment arms. The study did not meet the OS primary endpoint [HR: 0.92 (95% confidence interval (CI), 0.76-1.11), p-value 0.375]. The median OS for patients treated with eryaspase plus chemotherapy was 7.5 mo (95% CI, 6.5-8.3), compared to 6.7 mo (95% CI, 5.4-7.5) for chemotherapy alone. There was a trend of nominal OS benefit in 107 patients treated with eryaspase and irinotecan-5FU compared to 109 patients in control subgroup, with a median OS of 8.0 mo versus 5.7 mo, respectively [HR: 0.81 (95% CI: 0.60- 1.09)]. Treatment effect was consistent across various prognosis factors. Median PFS was 3.7 mo vs. 3.5 mo in the eryaspase and control arms, respectively [HR: 0.89 (95% CI: 0.73-1.07), p-value 0.215]. Disease control rate was 57.6% and 49.0% (p-value 0.047) in the eryaspase and control arms, respectively. The most common adverse events were in the eryaspase arm were asthenia, diarrhea, and anemia (Grade 3-4: 16.9%, 7.66% and 17.3%, respectively). Eryaspase did not appear to enhance toxicity of chemotherapy. Conclusion: This large prospective study did not meet it primary endpoint of improving OS in patients treated with eryaspase. The addition of eryaspase demonstrated nevertheless a well-tolerated profile and an encouraging survival benefit in the irinotecan/5FU subgroup, warranting further investigation. Clinical trial information: NCT03665441.

Relapsed or refractory (R/R) peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL) is an aggressive lymphoma with a median overall survival (OS) of 6 months. Most approved therapies have overall response rates (ORR) of < 30%, low complete response (CR) rates, and short progression free survival (PFS). Duvelisib (DUV), a dual PI3K-δ,γ inhibitor, is FDA approved at 25 mg twice daily (BID) for the treatment of R/R chronic lymphocytic leukemia or small lymphocytic lymphoma after ≥ 2 lines of prior therapy and R/R follicular lymphoma after ≥ 2 prior systemic therapies, the latter based on accelerated approval. DUV monotherapy demonstrated an ORR of 50% in patients (pts) with R/R PTCL in a Phase 1 study across multiple subtypes (Horwitz, Blood 2018). In the Phase 2, open-label, multi-center, PRIMO trial of DUV in R/R PTCL, the initial results of the dose-optimization phase (N=33) showed a 54% ORR in the 75 mg BID (N=13) and 35% in the 25 mg BID (N=20) cohorts by investigator assessment (INV) , the primary endpoint (Horwitz, ASH 2019). We report mature dose-optimization results and the initial results of a planned preliminary assessment (N=20) of the dose-expansion (NCT03372057; supported by Verastem Oncology). In the dose-optimization phase, pts received DUV at 25 mg (Cohort 1) or 75 mg BID (Cohort 2). Pts were evaluable if they completed 1 cycle (28 days) of DUV and had ≥ 1 efficacy assessment. The dose-expansion phase is ongoing with a targeted enrollment of 100 pts; pts were eligible if they had histologically confirmed R/R PTCL after ≥2 cycles of a prior standard regimen and a CD4 lymphocyte count of ≥ 50/mm3 (0.05 x 109/L). Based on the initial dose-optimization results, it was determined pts will receive DUV starting at 75 mg BID for 2 cycles to achieve more rapid tumor control, followed by 25 mg to try to maintain long-term disease control and mitigate the potential for later onset toxicities. Pts were to be maintained on therapy continuously until progressive disease (PD) or unacceptable toxicity. For those at 25mg BID, it was permitted for the dose to be re-escalated to 75 mg BID if an assessment shows PD and the pt had not required a dose modification due to toxicity. The primary endpoint is ORR by an Independent Review Committee (IRC), and secondary endpoints include duration of response (DOR), PFS, OS, disease control rate, and safety; all analyses consisted of pts that received at least 1 dose of DUV. The statistical analysis plan was amended to take a preliminary assessment of ORR after approximately 20 pts were evaluated for response in the dose-expansion phase, consistent with the number of pts that were evaluated in the dose-optimization phase (Cohort 2). Dose-Optimization Phase Efficacy Update: As of the data cutoff, 2 pts (1 each cohort) remain on treatment. Efficacy data are summarized in Table 1. Of those pts that achieved a CR, 1 in each cohort proceeded to undergo stem cell transplant or consolidated radiation therapy with curative intent, and are censored in the DOR assessment . Dose-Expansion Phase Initial Summary: As of the data cutoff of 23 March 2020, a total of 25 pts have been dosed, 20 of whom underwent at least 1 disease response assessment (Table 1). Pts had a median age of 61 years (range, 21-86 years) and a median of 2 prior therapies (range, 1-6). Forty-five percent (9/20) of pts remain on treatment (5 responders, 3 with assessments not yet performed, 1 on treatment with stable disease);11 pts discontinued due to PD (n=7), adverse events (n=2) , or to under go transplant (n=2). Responses occurred in 8/20 pts: PTCL-NOS (4 CR, 1 partial response [PR]), ALCL (1 PR), AITL (1 CR) and SPTCL (1 CR). The most frequent adverse events seen were neutrophil count decreased (25%), ALT increased (21%), WBC decreased (21%) and lymphocyte count decreased (21%). In summary, the DUV data observed to date show consistent response rates in a R/R PTCL pt population. The safety profile observed in PRIMO to date is consistent with the current safety profile of DUV. The mature dose-optimization phase results demonstrated a median DOR of 12.2 months for the 75 mg BID cohort. The preliminary results from the PRIMO dose-expansion cohort (75 mg BID followed by 25 mg BID dosing) show an ORR of 40 % and CR rate of 30% (6/20) by INV assessment. These data support continued evaluation of DUV as a treatment option for R/R PTCL. Updated data from the planned interim analysis after 40 pts enroll (occurred June 2020) will be presented. Disclosures Pro: Verastem Oncology: Research Funding. Brammer:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Kymera: Honoraria; Verastem Oncology: Other: Travel. Jacobsen:Takeda: Honoraria; Merck, Pharmacyclics, F. Hoffmann-LaRoche, Novartis: Research Funding; Acerta, AstraZeneca, Merck: Consultancy. Mehta-Shah:Corvus: Research Funding; Verastem: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Bristol Myers-Squibb: Research Funding; Genetech/Roche: Research Funding; C4 Therapeutics: Consultancy; Karyopharm Therapeutics: Consultancy; Innate Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Kyowa Hakko Kirin: Consultancy. Zain:Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Kyowa Kirlin: Research Funding; Mundai Pharma: Research Funding. Zinzani:Immune Design: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Merck: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; MSD: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Sandoz: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Janssen-Cilag: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Celltrion: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Verastem: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Sanofi: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; ADC Therapeutics: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Kirin Kyowa: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; EUSA Pharma: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Servier: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; TG Therapeutics, Inc.: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Portola: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Eusapharma: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Kyowa Kirin: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Immune Design: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; AbbVie: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Incyte: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Lustgarten:Verastem Oncology: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Youssoufian:Verastem Oncology: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Horwitz:Janssen: Consultancy; GlaxoSmithKline: Consultancy; Daiichi Sankyo: Research Funding; C4 Therapeutics: Consultancy; Beigene: Consultancy; Portola: Consultancy, Research Funding; Mundipharma: Consultancy; Innate Pharma: Consultancy; Corvus: Consultancy; Trillium: Consultancy, Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Millenium/Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding; Kyowa Hakka Kirin: Consultancy, Research Funding; Infinity/Verastem: Research Funding; Forty Seven: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Aileron: Consultancy, Research Funding; ADCT Therapeutics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Vividion Therapeutics: Consultancy; Verastem: Consultancy, Research Funding; Myeloid Therapeutics: Consultancy; Miragen: Consultancy; Kura Oncology: Consultancy; ASTEX: Consultancy; Affirmed: Consultancy. OffLabel Disclosure: Duvelisib (DUV), a dual PI3K-δ,γ inhibitor, is FDA approved at 25 mg twice daily (BID) for the treatment of R/R chronic lymphocytic leukemia or small lymphocytic lymphoma after at least 2 lines of prior therapy and R/R follicular lymphoma after at least 2 prior systemic therapies, the latter based on accelerated approval. This indication is approved under accelerated approval based on overall response rate. Continued approval for this indication may be contingent upon verification and description of clinical benefit in confirmatory trials. Duvelisib is not approved for Peripheral T-Cell Lymphoma. This study is investigating treatment or outcomes that have not received approval from a Health Authority. The information presented is not intended to convey conclusions of safety or efficacy. There is no guarantee that the outcome of these studies will result in approval by a Health Authority.

Purpose: In the phase III DUO trial, duvelisib, an oral dual PI3K-δ,γ inhibitor, demonstrated significantly improved efficacy versus ofatumumab [median (m) progression-free survival (PFS), 13.3 vs. 9.9 months (HR, 0.52; P < 0.0001); overall response rate [ORR], 74% vs. 45% (P < 0.0001)], with a manageable safety profile in patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL)/small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL). We report results from patients with progressive disease (PD) after ofatumumab who crossed over to duvelisib in the DUO trial. Patients and Methods: Patients with radiographically confirmed PD after ofatumumab received duvelisib 25 mg twice daily in 28-day cycles until PD, intolerance, death, or study withdrawal. The primary endpoint was ORR per investigator. Secondary endpoints included duration of response (DOR), PFS, and safety. Results: As of December 14, 2018, 90 ofatumumab-treated patients in the DUO trial prior to crossover had an ORR of 29%, mDOR of 10.4 months, and mPFS of 9.4 months. After crossover, 77% of patients (69/90) achieved a response, with an mDOR of 14.9 months and mPFS of 15.7 months. Patients with del(17p) and/or TP53 mutations had similar outcomes [ORR, 77% (20/26); mPFS, 14.7 months]. Notably, 73% of patients (47/64) with disease previously refractory to ofatumumab achieved a response. The most frequent any-grade/grade 3/4 treatment-emergent adverse events were diarrhea (47%/23%), neutropenia (26%/23%), pyrexia (24%/4%), cutaneous reactions (23%/4%), and thrombocytopenia (10%/6%). Conclusions: Duvelisib demonstrated high response rates with good durability and a manageable safety profile in patients with R/R CLL/SLL who progressed on ofatumumab, including patients with high-risk disease and disease previously refractory to ofatumumab.

TPS453 Background: FOLFIRINOX remains the standard of care for the first line treatment of patients with locally advanced and metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma, however the prognosis remains poor, thus novel treatment options are indicated. Eryaspase, asparaginase (ASNase) encapsulated in red blood cells (RBCs) is an investigational product under development. Following infusion, asparagine and glutamine are actively transported into RBCs where they are hydrolyzed by the encapsulated ASNase. A randomized phase IIb study in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer whose disease progressed following first-line treatment (NCT02195180) was previously conducted. Eryaspase in combination with gemcitabine monotherapy or FOLFOX combination therapy improved overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS). The safety profile of eryaspase was acceptable. A second line pivotal randomized phase III trial (Trybeca-1) is currently enrolling (NCT03665441). We design this phase I study to determine the safety of mFOLFIRINOX combined with Eryaspase in the first line of treatment. Methods: Patients with locally or metastatic biopsy proven pancreatic adenocarcinoma will be treated with the combination of mFOLFIRINOX plus Eryaspase. This will be a standard 3+3 design with 4 possible doing levels. mFOLFIRINOX dosing will include 5-Fluorouracil 2400 mg/m2 over 46 hours, Oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2, Irinotecan 150 mg/m2 plus Eryaspase 75 Units/kg at dose level 0. Eryaspase will be dose escalated up to 100 Units/kg. The study will enroll at three academic centers. Key eligibility criteria include performance status 0 or 1; locally advanced or metastatic tumor disease; adequate organ function. The primary objective is to determine the maximum tolerated dose and safety of this novel combination. Key secondary objectives include objective response rate, progression-free survival, overall survival, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and biomarker research. A data safety monitoring committee will review data every 3 months. Clinical trial information: 04292743.

Advancing nanomedicines from concept to clinic requires integration of new science with traditional pharmaceutical development. The medical and commercial success of nanomedicines is greatly facilitated when those charged with developing nanomedicines are cognizant of the unique opportunities and technical challenges that these products present. These individuals must also be knowledgeable about the processes of clinical and product development, including regulatory considerations, to maximize the odds for successful product registration. This article outlines these topics with a goal to accelerate the combination of academic innovation with collaborative industrial scientists who understand pharmaceutical development and regulatory approval requirements-only together can they realize the full potential of nanomedicines for patients.

TPS4666 Background: Second-line treatment options for advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma are currently limited. Eryaspase, asparaginase (ASNase) encapsulated in red blood cells (RBCs) is an investigational product under development. Following infusion, asparagine and glutamine are actively transported into RBCs where they are hydrolyzed by the encapsulated ASNase. We have recently reported the outcome of a randomized Phase 2b study inpatients with advanced pancreatic cancer whose disease progressed following first-line treatment(NCT02195180). Eryaspase in combination with gemcitabine monotherapy or FOLFOX combination therapy improved overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS). The safety profile of eryaspase was acceptable. The results of this Phase 2b study provided a rationale for initiating this confirmatory Phase 3 pivotal trial (TRYbeCA-1). Methods: TRYbeCA-1 is a randomized, open-label Phase 3 trial (N = ~500) of eryaspase combined with chemotherapy in patients with adenocarcinoma of the pancreas who have failed only one prior line of systemic anti-cancer therapy for advanced pancreatic cancer and have measurable disease. Patients are randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive gemcitabine/Abraxane or irinotecan-based therapy (FOLFIRI [FOLinic acid-Fluorouracil-IRInotecan regimen] or irinotecan liposome injection/5-fluorouracil/leucovorin) with or without eryaspase, administered as IV infusion on Day 1 and Day 15 of each 4-week cycle. Key eligibility criteria include performance status 0 or 1; stage III-IV disease; documented evidence of disease progression; available tumor tissue; and adequate organ function. The primary endpoint is OS. Key secondary endpoints include PFS and objective response rate, safety, quality of life, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, and biomarker research. A hazard ratio in OS of 0.725 is being targeted which represents a conservative estimate based on the Phase 2b data and is viewed as being highly clinically relevant. An IDMC is established to review safety at regular intervals andto review efficacy data at the planned interim and final analyses. IDMC last reviewed the trial in October 2019 and suggested the trial continue as planned. Clinical trial information: NCT03665441 .

Prostate cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related death in men in the United States. A major cause of drug resistance in prostate and other epithelial tumors may be due to the presence of a fraction of tumor cells that retain the ability to initiate tumors and hence are termed tumor-initiating cells (TIC) or cancer stem cells. Here, we report that darinaparsin, an organic derivative of arsenic trioxide, is cytotoxic to prostate cancer cell lines as well as fresh prostate cancer cells from patients at low micromolar concentrations, and importantly inhibits the TIC subpopulations. It also inhibits growth of the castrate-resistant Du145 prostate tumor propagated as xenograft in mice and inhibits the tumor-initiating potential of prostate cancer cells. Although the mechanism by which darinaparsin acts is not completely known, we show that it kills prostate cancer cells by blocking cells in the G2–M phase of the cell cycle and inhibits Hedgehog signaling by downregulating Gli-2 transcriptional activity. These data provide a rationale for evaluating darinaparsin in patients with castrate-resistant prostate cancer. Mol Cancer Ther; 14(1); 23–30. ©2014 AACR.

Background: Second-line treatment options for advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma are currently limited. Eryaspase, asparaginase (ASNase) encapsulated in red blood cells (RBCs), is an investigational product under development. Following infusion, asparagine and glutamine are actively transported into RBCs where they are hydrolyzed by the encapsulated ASNase. We have recently reported the outcome of a randomized phase 2b study in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer whose disease progressed following first-line treatment (NCT02195180). Eryaspase in combination with gemcitabine monotherapy or FOLFOX combination therapy improved overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). The safety profile of eryaspase was acceptable. The results of this phase 2b study provided a rationale for initiating this confirmatory phase 3 pivotal trial (TRYbeCA-1). Methods: TRYbeCA-1 is an international, randomized, open-label phase 3 trial (N= ~500) of eryaspase combined with chemotherapy in patients with adenocarcinoma of the pancreas who have failed only one prior line of systemic anticancer therapy for advanced pancreatic cancer and have measurable disease. Patients are randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive gemcitabine/abraxane or irinotecan-based therapy (FOLFIRI [FOLinic acid-Fluorouracil-IRInotecan regimen] or irinotecan liposome injection/5-fluorouracil/leucovorin) with or without eryaspase, administered as IV infusion on Day 1 and Day 15 of each 4-week cycle. Key eligibility criteria include performance status 0 or 1, stage IV disease, documented evidence of disease progression, available tumor tissue, and adequate organ function. The primary endpoint is OS. Key secondary endpoints include PFS and objective response rate, safety, quality of life, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, and biomarker research. A hazard ratio in OS of 0.725 is being targeted, which represents a conservative estimate based on the phase 2b data and is viewed as being highly clinically relevant. An IDMC will be established to review safety at regular intervals and to review efficacy data at the planned interim and final analyses. Citation Format: Pascal Hammel, Rosanna Berardi, Eric Van Cutsem, Jaime Feliu, Richard Greil, Harpreet Wasan, Jean-Philippe Metges, Peter Nygren, Pia Österlund, Marcus Noel, Thomas Seufferlein, Geert-Jan Creemers, Anu Gupta, Sophie Salesse, Nigel Biswas-Baldwin, Hedy Dion, Hagop Youssoufian, Iman El-Hariry, Manuel Hidalgo. Trybeca-1: A randomized, phase 3 study of eryaspase in combination with chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone as second-line treatment in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma (NCT03665441) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference on Pancreatic Cancer: Advances in Science and Clinical Care; 2019 Sept 6-9; Boston, MA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(24 Suppl):Abstract nr B22.

Introduction Relapsed or refractory (R/R) peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL) carries a poor prognosis, with most approved therapies having response rates of < 30% and limited progression-free survival (PFS). Duvelisib (DUV), a dual PI3K-δ,γ inhibitor, is FDA approved at 25 mg twice daily (BID) for the treatment of R/R chronic lymphocytic leukemia or small lymphocytic lymphoma after ≥ 2 lines of prior therapy and R/R follicular lymphoma after ≥ 2 prior systemic therapies. DUV exhibited potent activity against T-cell lymphoma cell lines in vitro, and DUV monotherapy at 25 or 75 mg BID demonstrated clinical activity in patients (pts) with R/R peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL) in phase 1 studies [overall response rate (ORR), 50%] across multiple subtypes (Horwitz et al. Blood 2018; Horwitz et al. 2019 ICML). The phase 2 PRIMO trial was designed to determine an optimal regimen of DUV monotherapy in R/R PTCL and characterize the efficacy and tolerability of DUV in this disease. We report the results for the dose-optimization phase of the PRIMO trial (NCT03372057). Methods In the dose-optimization phase, pts with R/R PTCL, ECOG performance score of ≤ 2, and no history of allogeneic stem cell transplant were randomized to receive DUV 25 mg BID with an option for dose escalation (cohort 1) or DUV 75 mg BID (cohort 2) continuously until development of progressive disease or unacceptable toxicity (cycle = 28 days). The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed ORR, and secondary endpoints included duration of response and safety. Results A total of 33 pts (cohort 1, n = 20; cohort 2, n = 13) were treated in the dose-optimization phase (Table). Pts had a median of 1.5 years (range, 0.3-12.7 years) from initial diagnosis and a median of 2 prior therapies (range, 1-8). Patients were evaluable if they completed 1 cycle of DUV and had ≥ 1 efficacy assessment. Nonevaluable patients could be replaced. Response was assessed in the evaluable and overall populations. All patients in cohort 2 and 13 of 20 patients in cohort 1 were able to complete 1 cycle of therapy. Seven patients in cohort 1 discontinued therapy early due to disease progression and/or toxicity. Low CD4 counts (< 50 cells/mm3; Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events grade 4) were associated with early discontinuation of DUV. Most responses (cohort 1, 5/7; cohort 2, 6/7) were observed at the end of cycle 1. At a median follow-up of 20 weeks, the majority of responders (cohort 1, 4/7; cohort 2, 6/7) were still in response at the time of their last assessment. ORR as assessed by blinded independent central review could be determined for 31 patients and was 42% in cohort 1 and 67% in cohort 2. Table. Analysis Populations and Investigator-Assessed Response Pharmacokinetic analysis demonstrated a dose-related increase in exposure, with ≈ 2-fold increase in the steady-state exposure of DUV at the 75 vs 25 mg BID dosage, suggesting that adequate exposure can be more rapidly and reliably achieved with a higher dose of DUV. No differences were observed in pharmacodynamic markers (pAKT in monocytes and B cells) at 25 and 75 mg dose levels. The most common (≥ 3 patients) grade ≥ 3 adverse events (AEs) in all patients receiving DUV were neutropenia (7), thrombocytopenia (5), and sepsis (4), with disease progression, pneumonia, aspartate aminotransferase elevation, lymphopenia, dyspnea, and rash observed in 3 patients. Serious AEs occurring in ≥ 2 patients were colitis, pyrexia, disease progression, sepsis, pneumonia, hyponatremia, dyspnea, pneumonitis, and respiratory failure. Overall, 12% of pts receiving DUV discontinued due to an AE. Conclusions These findings confirm that both 25 and 75 mg BID starting dosages of DUV are clinically active in pts with R/R PTCL, with complete responses in both cohorts. There were no unexpected toxicities. Early progression was seen more frequently in the 25 mg cohort, and higher initial exposure may be important in aggressive diseases. The expansion phase of the PRIMO trial will investigate DUV starting at 75 mg BID for 2 cycles to achieve rapid tumor response, followed by 25 mg BID to maintain long-term disease control and mitigate the potential for later onset toxicity. Disclosures Horwitz: Miragen: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Aileron: Research Funding; Aileron: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Research Funding; ADCT Therapeutics: Research Funding; Corvus Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Kyowa Hakko Kirin: Consultancy; Astex: Consultancy; Affimed: Consultancy; Kura: Consultancy; Infinity/Verastem: Consultancy, Research Funding; Portola: Consultancy; Affimed: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Millennium/Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Innate Pharma: Consultancy; Millennium/Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding; Astex: Consultancy; ADCT Therapeutics: Research Funding; Portola: Consultancy; Mundipharma: Consultancy; Aileron: Research Funding; Portola: Consultancy; Forty-Seven: Research Funding; Trillium: Research Funding; Aileron: Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Millennium/Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding; Kura: Consultancy; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Astex: Consultancy; Forty-Seven: Research Funding; Corvus Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; ADCT Therapeutics: Research Funding; Astex: Consultancy; Miragen: Consultancy; Kyowa Hakko Kirin: Consultancy; Millennium/Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding; Affimed: Consultancy; Miragen: Consultancy; Mundipharma: Consultancy; Innate Pharma: Consultancy; Forty-Seven: Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Innate Pharma: Consultancy; Innate Pharma: Consultancy; Mundipharma: Consultancy; Corvus Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Affimed: Consultancy; Kyowa Hakko Kirin: Consultancy; Trillium: Research Funding; Forty-Seven: Research Funding; Kyowa Hakko Kirin: Consultancy; Kura: Consultancy; Infinity/Verastem: Consultancy, Research Funding; Corvus Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Miragen: Consultancy; Trillium: Research Funding; Kura: Consultancy; Mundipharma: Consultancy; Infinity/Verastem: Consultancy, Research Funding; Trillium: Research Funding; Infinity/Verastem: Consultancy, Research Funding; Portola: Consultancy; ADCT Therapeutics: Research Funding. Mehta-Shah:Kiowa Hakka Kirin: Consultancy; Roche/Genentech: Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Verastem Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Innate Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding. Pro:Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel Expenses; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Kyowa Hakka Kirin: Consultancy, Honoraria; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel Expenses, Research Funding. Jacobsen:Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Merck: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Takeda: Honoraria; Acerta: Consultancy; Astra-Zeneca: Consultancy; F. Hoffmann-LaRoche: Research Funding. Casulo:Celgene: Research Funding; Gilead: Honoraria, Other: Travel, accommodation, expenses; Roche: Other: Travel, accommodation, expenses. Brammer:Celgene: Research Funding; Seatlle Genetics: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Haney:Verastem Inc: Employment, Equity Ownership. Youssoufian:Verastem Oncology: Consultancy, Equity Ownership. Weaver:Verastem Oncology: Employment, Equity Ownership, Patents & Royalties: Inventor; Hillstream Biopharma: Consultancy, Equity Ownership; FemtoDx: Consultancy, Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Patents & Royalties: Inventor. Baglio:Verastem Oncology: Employment. Narasimhan:Verastem: Employment, Equity Ownership. Zain:Spectrum: Consultancy; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy. OffLabel Disclosure: Duvelisib (DUV), a dual PI3K-delta,gamma inhibitor, is US FDA approved at 25 mg twice daily (BID) for the treatment of R/R chronic lymphocytic leukemia or small lymphocytic lymphoma after at least 2 lines of prior therapy and R/R follicular lymphoma after at least two prior systemic therapies.

Background: Myelofibrosis (MF) is a life-threatening disease characterized by splenomegaly, constitutional symptoms, and shortened survival. Although ruxolitinib, a JAK1/2 inhibitor, is approved for Intermediate or High-risk MF and can reduce the spleen size and improve quality of life, many patients discontinue due to loss of efficacy. In preclinical models, the activity of mutated JAK2 is tightly regulated by epichaperomes, a complex network of proteins which forms under cellular stress, such as cancer, and nucleates on heat shock protein 90 (Hsp90), which in turn assumes a specific conformation in its ATP binding domain. PU-H71 is a first-in-class inhibitor of tumor epichaperome-specific Hsp90, which potently kills cancer cells via disruption of the epichaperome and degradation of JAK2 as well as other client proteins. Prior dose-ranging studies of PU-H71 administered intravenously to patients with cancer identified a safe and tolerable dose. In this study, we assess an oral formulation of PU-H71 and evaluate the hypothesis that its cancer-specific mechanism combined with ruxolitinib may result in added clinical benefit as well as a wider therapeutic window. Methods: This is a multicenter, Phase 1b study with dose escalation and expansion cohorts designed to assess the safety, tolerability, PK, and preliminary efficacy of PU-H71 in patients with PMF, Post-PV MF, Post ET MF. Up to 24 patients who have active disease and receiving ≥3 months of ruxolitinib therapy (and on a stable dose for 8 weeks before starting therapy with PU-H71) will be enrolled. Evidence of persistent or worsening disease consisting of disease-related symptoms and splenomegaly of at least 5 cm below the costal margin as measured by physical examination are required. Additional inclusion criteria include a baseline platelet count of ≥50,000/mL and AST/ALT ≤2 x Upper Limit of Normal. Patients with a QT interval corrected using Fridericia's formula (QTcF) >480 ms (corrected) or left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤50% are excluded. The study will employ a standard 3+3 dose escalation design beginning with 50 mg/day to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended Phase 2 dose (RP2D), with additional patients treated in a dose expansion cohort. Response to treatment will be assessed by the 2013 revised International Working Group-Myeloproliferative Neoplasm Research and Treatment and European Leukemia Net. Additional assessments will include symptom burden assessment using the Myeloproliferative Neoplasm Symptom Assessment Form Total Symptom Score, bone marrow histology, JAK2V617F allele burden, serum cytokine profiles, flow cytometry of peripheral blood mononuclear cells for epichaperome status, and pharmacokinetic studies. Enrollment is ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT03935555. Disclosures Pemmaraju: abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; samus: Research Funding; celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; cellectis: Research Funding; Stemline Therapeutics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; plexxikon: Research Funding; Daiichi-Sankyo: Research Funding; sagerstrong: Research Funding; affymetrix: Research Funding; incyte: Consultancy, Research Funding; mustangbio: Consultancy, Research Funding. Gundabolu:Samus Therapeutics: Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; Jazz pharmaceuticals: Consultancy. Pettit:Samus Therapeutics: Research Funding. Talpaz:Imago BioSciences: Consultancy, Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Constellation: Research Funding; CTI BioPharma: Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Samus Therapeutics: Research Funding. Podoltsev:Alexion: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Genentech: Research Funding; Kartos Therapeutics: Research Funding; Blueprint Medicines: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Boehringer Ingelheim: Research Funding; Astellas Pharma: Research Funding; Daiichi Sankyo: Research Funding; Sunesis Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; AI Therapeutics: Research Funding; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; Astex Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; CTI Biopharma: Research Funding; Celgene: Other: Grant funding, Research Funding; Samus Therapeutics: Research Funding; Arog Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Agios Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Incyte: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Schiller:Amgen: Other, Research Funding; Biomed Valley Discoveries: Research Funding; Astellas: Research Funding; Eli Lilly and Company: Research Funding; FujiFilm: Research Funding; Genzyme: Research Funding; Gilead: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; J&J: Research Funding; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Research Funding; Karyopharm: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Onconova: Research Funding; Pfizer Pharmaceuticals: Equity Ownership, Research Funding; Sangamo Therapeutics: Research Funding; Bristol Myer Squibb: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Constellation Pharmaceutical: Research Funding; Daiichi Sankyo: Research Funding; Agios: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Eisenberg:Samus Therapeutics: Research Funding. Youssoufian:Samus Therapeutics: Consultancy. Duggan:Samus Therapeutics: Employment. Wallner:Samus Therapeutics: Employment. Verstovsek:Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; NS Pharma: Research Funding; Constellation: Consultancy; Pragmatist: Consultancy; Gilead: Research Funding; Protaganist Therapeutics: Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Roche: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Genetech: Research Funding; CTI BioPharma Corp: Research Funding; Blueprint Medicines Corp: Research Funding; Sierra Oncology: Research Funding; Pharma Essentia: Research Funding; Astrazeneca: Research Funding; Ital Pharma: Research Funding; Promedior: Research Funding.

Background Duvelisib, an oral dual PI3K-δ and PI3K-γ inhibitor, is approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of adult patients with relapsed or refractory (R/R) follicular lymphoma (FL) after ≥ 2 prior systemic therapies. In multiple phase 1-3 studies that included patients with iNHL, duvelisib was shown to be efficacious, with a favorable risk-benefit profile. This study will evaluate whether duvelisib efficacy at the approved 25 mg twice daily (BID) dose can be achieved and maintained with an acceptable or improved safety profile by the inclusion of prespecified 2-week drug holidays in patients with R/R iNHL. Study Design and Methods TEMPO is a randomized, open-label, multicenter, international, phase 2 study of duvelisib in adult patients with R/R iNHL in whom ≥ 1 line of prior therapy has failed. The primary objective is to evaluate the efficacy of duvelisib administered with prescribed drug holidays, with the primary endpoint of overall response rate (ORR) by the 2007 revised International Working Group criteria. Key secondary endpoints include ORR by the 2014 Lugano criteria, progression-free survival, overall survival, time to treatment failure, duration of response, lymph node response rate, time to the first response, adverse event profile, and determination of pharmacokinetics parameters. Exploratory objectives include assessment of quality of life and biomarkers of treatment response and toxicity. Key inclusion criteria include histologically confirmed FL grades 1 to 3a, marginal zone lymphoma (splenic, nodal, or extranodal) or small lymphocytic lymphoma, radiological evidence of disease progression and ≥ 1 bidimensionally measurable lesion ≥ 1.5 cm, adequate organ function, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status ≤ 2. Key exclusion criteria include prior allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant; previous treatment with a PI3K inhibitor; history of drug-induced colitis or drug-induced pneumonitis; ongoing treatment for systemic infection; central nervous system NHL; prolonged QT interval; history of tuberculosis treatment within the 2 past years; history of stroke, unstable angina, myocardial infarction, or ventricular arrhythmia requiring medication or mechanical control within the past 6 months; history of or concurrent interstitial lung disease of any severity and/or severely impaired lung function; ongoing treatment with chronic immunosuppressants; and any unstable or severe uncontrolled medical condition. A total of 102 patients are planned to be enrolled. Patients will be randomized 1:1 to 2 arms and stratified by number of prior therapies (1 or > 1), bulky disease status (longest diameter of baseline lesion < 5 cm or ≥ 5 cm), and time since last recurrence (≥ 24 months or < 24 months). In arm 1, patients will receive duvelisib 25 mg BID for one 10-week (W) cycle followed by 25 mg BID on W3 and W4 of each subsequent 4-week cycle. In arm 2, patients will receive duvelisib 25 mg BID on W1, W2, W5, W6, W9, and W10 of one 10-week cycle and then on W3 and W4 of each subsequent 4-week cycle. Patients will be treated until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal. This study will test the null hypothesis that the ORR in each arm is ≤ 30% against the alternative that the ORR is ≥ 55%. The study has a 2-stage design. In stage 1, 15 patients will be enrolled in each arm, with response assessment after ≥ 3 cycles. If there are fewer than 6 partial or complete responses, consideration may be given to terminating the arm. Otherwise, in stage 2, 36 additional patients will be enrolled, for a total of 51 per arm. Enrollment is planned to be initiated in August 2019. Approximately 50 sites will be open for enrollment across the United States, Europe, and Asia. Disclosures Karmali: Takeda, BMS: Other: Research Funding to Institution; Gilead/Kite; Juno/Celgene: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Astrazeneca: Speakers Bureau. Youssoufian:Verastem Oncology: Consultancy, Equity Ownership. Sprott:SMOC Therapeutics: Employment, Equity Ownership; Verastem Oncology: Employment, Equity Ownership. Weaver:FemtoDx: Consultancy, Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Patents & Royalties: Inventor; Verastem Oncology: Employment, Equity Ownership, Patents & Royalties: Inventor; Hillstream Biopharma: Consultancy, Equity Ownership. Narasimhan:Verastem: Employment, Equity Ownership. Lustgarten:Verastem: Employment. Patrick:Verastem Oncology: Employment. Zalutskaya:Verastem Inc: Employment, Equity Ownership. Gordon:Gilead: Other: Advisory Board; Juno/Celgene: Other: Advisory Board, Research Funding; Zylem LLC: Other: co-founder; research in nanoparticles in cancer; Bayer: Other: Advisory Board. OffLabel Disclosure: Duvelisib (DUV), a dual PI3K-delta,gamma inhibitor, is US FDA approved at 25 mg twice daily (BID) for the treatment of R/R chronic lymphocytic leukemia or small lymphocytic lymphoma after at least 2 lines of prior therapy and R/R follicular lymphoma after at least two prior systemic therapies.

Background Triple Negative Breast Cancer (TNBC) represents approximately 15% of all breast cancer. It confers a poorer prognosis relative to the other breast cancer subtypes, with an increased likelihood of recurrence and death within 5 years of diagnosis. There is no standard of care specifically for patients presenting with TNBC. Altered amino acid metabolism have been shown to play a role in TNBC. Eryaspase, asparaginase (ASNase) encapsulated in red blood cells (RBCs) is an investigational product under development. Following infusion, asparagine and glutamine are actively transported into RBCs where they are hydrolyzed by the encapsulated ASNase. In a recent randomized phase 2b study, eryaspase has demonstrated evidence of improved overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS) and acceptable safety when combinedwith gemcitabine or FOLFOX therapyinpatients with advanced pancreatic cancer whose disease progressed following first-line treatment (NCT02195180). The demonstration of ASNase activity of eryaspase in combination with chemotherapy including DNA-damaging agents in both preclinical and clinical settings provide a rationale to further test combination in TNBC. Trial design TRYbeCA-2 is an international, randomized, open-label phase 2/3 trial (N = 64 for phase 2) of eryaspase combined with chemotherapy in patients with locally recurrent or metastatic TNBC who have not received prior systemic therapy for locally recurrent or metastatic disease. Patients are randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive gemcitabine/carboplatin with or without eryaspase, administered as IV infusion on Day 1 and Day 8 of each 3-week cycle. Key eligibility criteria include measurable lesion(s), performance status 0 or 1, and adequate organ function. The primary endpoint is the objective response rate (ORR) as determined by an independent radiological review. Key secondary endpoints include ORR as determined by the investigator’s assessment, clinical benefit rate, overall survival, progression-free survival, safety, biomarker research, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. Clinical trial identification NCT03674242. Legal entity responsible for the study Erytech. Funding Erytech. Disclosure J. Bertrand: Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options, Full / Part-time employment: Erytech. A. Clermont: Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options, Full / Part-time employment: Erytech. R. Pollard: Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options, Full / Part-time employment: Erytech. R. Chrestia-Blanchine: Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options, Full / Part-time employment: Erytech. N. Biswas-Baldwin: Leadership role, Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options, Full / Part-time employment: Erytech. I. El-Hariry: Leadership role, Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options, Full / Part-time employment: Erytech. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.