Search

Introduction: Tau-positron emission tomography (PET) outcome data of patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD) cannot currently be meaningfully compared or combined when different tracers are used due to differences in tracer properties, instrumentation, and methods of analysis., Methods: Using head-to-head data from five cohorts with tau PET radiotracers designed to target tau deposition in AD, we tested a joint propagation model (JPM) to harmonize quantification (units termed "CenTauR" [CTR]). JPM is a statistical model that simultaneously models the relationships between head-to-head and anchor point data. JPM was compared to a linear regression approach analogous to the one used in the amyloid PET Centiloid scale., Results: A strong linear relationship was observed between CTR values across brain regions. Using the JPM approach, CTR estimates were similar to, but more accurate than, those derived using the linear regression approach., Discussion: Preliminary findings using the JPM support the development and adoption of a universal scale for tau-PET quantification., Highlights: Tested a novel joint propagation model (JPM) to harmonize quantification of tau PET. Units of common scale are termed "CenTauRs". Tested a Centiloid-like linear regression approach. Using five cohorts with head-to-head tau PET, JPM outperformed linearregressionbased approach. Strong linear relationship was observed between CenTauRs values across brain regions., (© 2024 The Author(s). Alzheimer's & Dementia published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Alzheimer's Association.)

Introduction: Aducanumab selectively targets aggregated forms of amyloid beta (Aβ), a neuropathological hallmark of Alzheimer's disease (AD)., Methods: PRIME was a Phase 1b, double-blind, randomized clinical trial of aducanumab. During the 12-month placebo-controlled period, participants with prodromal AD or mild AD dementia were randomized to receive aducanumab or placebo. At week 56, participants could enroll in a long-term extension (LTE), in which all participants received aducanumab. The primary endpoint was safety and tolerability., Results: Amyloid-related imaging abnormalities-edema (ARIA-E) were the most common adverse event. Dose titration was associated with a decrease in the incidence of ARIA-E. Over 48 months, aducanumab decreased brain amyloid levels in a dose- and time-dependent manner. Exploratory endpoints suggested a continued benefit in the reduction of clinical decline over 48 months., Discussion: The safety profile of aducanumab remained unchanged in the LTE of PRIME. Amyloid plaque levels continued to decrease in participants treated with aducanumab., Highlights: PRIME was a Phase 1b, double-blind, randomized clinical trial of aducanumab. We report cumulative safety and 48-month efficacy results from PRIME. Amyloid-related imaging abnormalities-edema (ARIA-E) were the most common adverse event (AE); 61% of participants with ARIA-E were asymptomatic. Dose titration was associated with a decrease in the incidence of ARIA-E. Aducanumab decreased levels of amyloid beta (Aβ) in a dose- and time-dependent manner., (© 2024 Biogen and The Authors. Alzheimer's & Dementia published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Alzheimer's Association.)

In Alzheimer's disease, the spread of aberrantly phosphorylated tau is an important criterion in the Braak staging of disease severity and correlates with disease symptomatology. Here, we report the results of TANGO ( NCT03352557 ), a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group and multiple-dose long-term trial of gosuranemab-a monoclonal antibody to N-terminal tau-in patients with early Alzheimer's disease. The primary objective was to assess the safety and tolerability of gosuranemab compared to placebo. The secondary objectives were to assess the efficacy of multiple doses of gosuranemab in slowing cognitive and functional impairment (using the Clinical Dementia Rating Scale Sum of Boxes (CDR-SB) scores at week 78) and evaluate the immunogenicity of gosuranemab (using the incidence of anti-gosuranemab antibody responses). Participants were randomized (n = 654); received (n = 650) low-dose (125 mg once every 4 weeks (q4w), n = 58; 375 mg q12w, n = 58), intermediate-dose (600 mg q4w, n = 106) or high-dose (2,000 mg q4w, n = 214) gosuranemab or placebo (q4w, n = 214) intravenously for 78 weeks; and assigned to cerebrospinal fluid (n = 327) and/or tau positron emission tomography (n = 357) biomarker substudies. Gosuranemab had an acceptable safety profile and was generally well tolerated (incidence of serious adverse events: placebo, 12.1%; low dose, 10.3%; intermediate dose, 12.3%; high dose, 11.7%). The incidence of treatment-emergent gosuranemab antibody responses was low at all time points. No significant effects were identified in cognitive and functional tests as no dose resulted in a favorable change from the baseline CDR-SB score at week 78 compared to placebo control (adjusted mean change: placebo, 1.85; low dose, 2.20; intermediate dose, 2.24; high dose, 1.85). At week 76, all doses caused significant (P < 0.0001) reductions in the cerebrospinal fluid levels of unbound N-terminal tau compared to placebo., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Introduction: We assessed the use of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers as an alternative to positron emission tomography (PET) for brain amyloid beta (Aβ) pathology confirmation in the EMERGE and ENGAGE clinical trials., Methods: EMERGE and ENGAGE were randomized, placebo-controlled, Phase 3 trials of aducanumab in participants with early Alzheimer's disease. Concordance between CSF biomarkers (Aβ42, Aβ40, phosphorylated tau 181, and total tau) and amyloid PET status (visual read) at screening was examined., Results: Robust concordance between CSF biomarkers and amyloid PET visual status was observed (for Aβ42/Aβ40, AUC: 0.90; 95% CI: 0.83-0.97; p < 0.0001), confirming CSF biomarkers as a reliable alternative to amyloid PET in these studies. Compared with single CSF biomarkers, CSF biomarker ratios showed better agreement with amyloid PET visual reads, demonstrating high diagnostic accuracy., Discussion: These analyses add to the growing body of evidence supporting CSF biomarkers as reliable alternatives to amyloid PET imaging for brain Aβ pathology confirmation., Highlights: CSF biomarkers and amyloid PET concordance were assessed in Ph3 aducanumab trials. Robust concordance between CSF biomarkers and amyloid PET was observed. CSF biomarker ratios increased diagnostic accuracy over single CSF biomarkers. CSF Aβ42/Aβ40 demonstrated high concordance with amyloid PET. Results support CSF biomarker testing as a reliable alternative to amyloid PET., (© 2023 the Alzheimer's Association.)

Clinical Dementia Rating-Sum of Boxes (CDR-SB) assessments from two Phase 3 studies (ENGAGE and EMERGE) of aducanumab in subjects with early Alzheimer's disease (AD) were pooled to develop an exposure-response (ER) model. A linear model in the logit-transformed scaled CDR-SB best characterized the time profile for placebo- and aducanumab-treated subjects, with concentration as the exposure metric. The model allowed delineation of slow (4%), typical (86%), and fast (10%) progressing subpopulations in the data. The estimated drug effect on the disease progression rate was significant, 2.05 L/(g·year), with a 95% confidence interval (1.60, 2.50) that did not include zero. Following an evaluation of a series of ER model forms including differential drug and null effects either between the studies or among the three progression classes, the final ER model with a common (pooled) estimate of the drug effect between the studies and among the three progression classes was considered parsimonious. The final model provides supportive evidence that the two studies demonstrate a common intrinsic pharmacology. None of the identified covariates (Mini-Mental State Examination-BL score and Asian race) were clinically meaningful. Finally, simulations demonstrated that the intrinsic pharmacology remained consistent between the two Phase 3 studies., (© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)

Introduction: Individuals with progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP) experience cognitive changes that are challenging to follow without a validated neuropsychological test battery to measure progression. This study describes a composite measure to evaluate cognition in individuals with PSP., Methods: Baseline cognitive test data from 486 participants with PSP in the PASSPORT (NCT03068468) study included the Repeatable Battery for Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS), Color Trails Test (CTT) parts 1 and 2, letter-number sequencing, and letter fluency. Data were analyzed using summary statistics and a matrix of Pearson correlations. A hypothetical factor structure was constructed and validated., Results: Observed correlations were highest for scores between story memory and story recall (correlation coefficient = 0.78) and lowest for scores between letter fluency and picture naming (correlation coefficient = 0.11), and picture naming and figure copy (correlation coefficient = 0.12). After excluding picture naming and Color Trails Test (CTT) parts 1 and 2, a 3-factor structure was hypothesized for the remaining 13 tests. Confirmatory factor analysis demonstrated goodness of fit within acceptable limits (comparative fit index and Tucker-Lewis index = 0.98, standardized root-mean-square residual and root-mean-square error of approximation = 0.05-0.06). Mixed-model repeated-measures analysis of change from baseline to week 52 in RBANS and PSP cognitive composite score produced mean-to-standard-deviation ratios of 0.418 and 0.780, respectively., Conclusions: This novel composite endpoint, based on RBANS and designed to account for motor impairments in PSP, improves on current cognitive assessments PSP., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 52-week study (no. NCT03068468) evaluated gosuranemab, an anti-tau monoclonal antibody, in the treatment of progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP). In total, 486 participants dosed were assigned to either gosuranemab (n = 321) or placebo (n = 165). Efficacy was not demonstrated on adjusted mean change of PSP Rating Scale score at week 52 between gosuranemab and placebo (10.4 versus 10.6, P = 0.85, primary endpoint), or at secondary endpoints, resulting in discontinuation of the open-label, long-term extension. Unbound N-terminal tau in cerebrospinal fluid decreased by 98% with gosuranemab and increased by 11% with placebo (P < 0.0001). Incidences of adverse events and deaths were similar between groups. This well-powered study suggests that N-terminal tau neutralization does not translate into clinical efficacy., (© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature America, Inc.)

Background: Progressive supranuclear palsy is a rare neurodegenerative disease associated with dysfunctional tau protein. BIIB092 is a humanised monoclonal antibody that binds to N-terminal tau and is thus being assessed as a potential novel treatment for progressive supranuclear palsy. We aimed to investigate the safety and tolerability of BIIB092 in individuals with progressive supranuclear palsy., Methods: This 12-week, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, multiple ascending dose, phase 1b trial was done at 13 outpatient sites in the USA. Participants aged 41-86 years with probable or possible progressive supranuclear palsy with a score of 20 or greater on the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) were enrolled. Three BIIB092 dose escalation cohorts (150 mg, 700 mg, or 2100 mg; eight participants per cohort) were tested sequentially. For each dose cohort, the first two participants were randomly assigned by a computer-generated scheme to receive either BIIB092 or placebo intravenously every 4 weeks for 57 days. After 2 days, the six remaining participants in each cohort were randomly assigned (5:1) to receive BIIB092 or placebo for 57 days. An additional expansion panel of 24 patients was randomly assigned (3:1) to receive 2100 mg or placebo every 4 weeks for 57 days. All participants were followed up to day 85. The primary outcome was safety, which was analysed in the treated population (all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of the study drug). This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02460094., Findings: Between Oct 2, 2015, and Oct 19, 2016, 48 participants were enrolled and randomly assigned to the BIIB092 (n=36) and placebo (n=12) groups. No apparent demographic differences were observed between the two groups at baseline. All 48 participants completed the treatment phase of the study. Adverse events were generally mild to moderate in severity; the most common in the placebo and BIIB092 groups were falls (in two [17%] of 12 patients and in ten [28%] of 36 patients), urinary tract infections (in one [8%] of 12 and in six [17%] of 36), contusions (in one [8%] of 12 and in five [14%] of 36), and headaches (in none and in five [14%] of 36). Four serious adverse events resulting in admission to hospital were reported in three participants who received BIIB092 2100 mg: two severe adverse events of urinary tract infection, one severe adverse event of change in mental status, and one moderate adverse event of aspiration pneumonia. None was considered to be related to the study drug, all were resolved, and no deaths were reported., Interpretation: Repeated administration of the anti-tau monoclonal antibody BIIB092, at doses of up to 2100 mg, appears to be well tolerated in participants with progressive supranuclear palsy. Results of this phase 1b trial have informed the design of the ongoing phase 2 PASSPORT (NCT03068468) study to examine the efficacy and safety of BIIB092., Funding: Bristol-Myers Squibb, Biogen., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

The Alzheimer's Association's Research Roundtable met in November 2017 to explore the new National Institute on Aging and the Alzheimer's Association Research Framework for Alzheimer's disease. The meeting allowed experts in the field from academia, industry, and government to provide perspectives on the new National Institute on Aging and the Alzheimer's Association Research Framework. This review will summarize the "A, T, N System" (Amyloid, Tau, and Neurodegeneration) using biomarkers and how this may be applied to clinical research and drug development. In addition, challenges and barriers to the potential adoption of this new framework will be discussed. Finally, future directions for research will be proposed., (Copyright © 2018 the Alzheimer's Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

In 2011, the National Institute on Aging and Alzheimer's Association created separate diagnostic recommendations for the preclinical, mild cognitive impairment, and dementia stages of Alzheimer's disease. Scientific progress in the interim led to an initiative by the National Institute on Aging and Alzheimer's Association to update and unify the 2011 guidelines. This unifying update is labeled a "research framework" because its intended use is for observational and interventional research, not routine clinical care. In the National Institute on Aging and Alzheimer's Association Research Framework, Alzheimer's disease (AD) is defined by its underlying pathologic processes that can be documented by postmortem examination or in vivo by biomarkers. The diagnosis is not based on the clinical consequences of the disease (i.e., symptoms/signs) in this research framework, which shifts the definition of AD in living people from a syndromal to a biological construct. The research framework focuses on the diagnosis of AD with biomarkers in living persons. Biomarkers are grouped into those of β amyloid deposition, pathologic tau, and neurodegeneration [AT(N)]. This ATN classification system groups different biomarkers (imaging and biofluids) by the pathologic process each measures. The AT(N) system is flexible in that new biomarkers can be added to the three existing AT(N) groups, and new biomarker groups beyond AT(N) can be added when they become available. We focus on AD as a continuum, and cognitive staging may be accomplished using continuous measures. However, we also outline two different categorical cognitive schemes for staging the severity of cognitive impairment: a scheme using three traditional syndromal categories and a six-stage numeric scheme. It is important to stress that this framework seeks to create a common language with which investigators can generate and test hypotheses about the interactions among different pathologic processes (denoted by biomarkers) and cognitive symptoms. We appreciate the concern that this biomarker-based research framework has the potential to be misused. Therefore, we emphasize, first, it is premature and inappropriate to use this research framework in general medical practice. Second, this research framework should not be used to restrict alternative approaches to hypothesis testing that do not use biomarkers. There will be situations where biomarkers are not available or requiring them would be counterproductive to the specific research goals (discussed in more detail later in the document). Thus, biomarker-based research should not be considered a template for all research into age-related cognitive impairment and dementia; rather, it should be applied when it is fit for the purpose of the specific research goals of a study. Importantly, this framework should be examined in diverse populations. Although it is possible that β-amyloid plaques and neurofibrillary tau deposits are not causal in AD pathogenesis, it is these abnormal protein deposits that define AD as a unique neurodegenerative disease among different disorders that can lead to dementia. We envision that defining AD as a biological construct will enable a more accurate characterization and understanding of the sequence of events that lead to cognitive impairment that is associated with AD, as well as the multifactorial etiology of dementia. This approach also will enable a more precise approach to interventional trials where specific pathways can be targeted in the disease process and in the appropriate people., (Copyright © 2018 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Lanabecestat (AZD3293; LY3314814) is an orally active potent inhibitor of human β-secretase 1 in clinical development for the treatment of Alzheimer disease. In this first Japanese clinical study for an Alzheimer disease intervention to include cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) sampling in Japanese elderly healthy subjects, we report the pharmacokinetics and effects on plasma and CSF amyloid-β (Aβ) peptides of lanabecestat in a phase 1 study involving 40 healthy Japanese subjects (NCT02005211). No safety and tolerability concerns were identified in healthy Japanese subjects exposed to lanabecestat up to the highest doses given, which is consistent with observations in a US phase 1 study of lanabecestat. Exposure to lanabecestat was similar for young and elderly subjects and increased in a dose-dependent manner. For elderly subjects, plasma lanabecestat half-life after multiple dosing was 12 to 17 hours (on days 10 and 14). Robust plasma and CSF Aβ peptide reductions were also seen at all doses, with CSF Aβ 42 concentrations reduced by 63% and 79% in the 15- and 50-mg lanabecestat groups, respectively. CSF soluble amyloid-β precursor protein β also decreased following lanabecestat treatment. Suppression of CSF Aβ peptides was similar in elderly healthy Japanese subjects and US patients with mild to moderate Alzheimer disease. Lanabecestat is a promising potentially disease-modifying treatment in phase 3 development for patients with early Alzheimer disease., (© 2017, The American College of Clinical Pharmacology.)

AZD3293 (LY3314814) is a promising new potentially disease-modifying BACE1 (β-secretase) inhibitor in Phase III clinical development for the treatment of Alzheimer's disease. Reported here are the first two Phase I studies: (1) a single ascending dose study evaluating doses of 1-750 mg with a food-effect component (n = 72), and (2) a 2-week multiple ascending dose study evaluating doses of 15 or 50 mg once daily (QD) or 70 mg once weekly (QW) in elderly subjects (Part 1, n = 31), and 15, 50, or 150 mg QD in patients with mild to moderate Alzheimer's disease (Part 2, n = 16). AZD3293 was generally well tolerated up to the highest doses given. No notable food effects were observed. PK following multiple doses (Part 2) were tmax of 1 to 3 h and mean t1/2 of 16 to 21 h across the 15 to 150 mg dose range. For single doses of ≥5 mg, a ≥70% reduction was observed in mean plasma Aβ40 and Aβ42 concentrations, with prolonged suppression for up to 3 weeks at the highest dose level studied. Following multiple doses, robust reductions in plasma (≥64% at 15 mg and ≥78% at ≥50 mg) and cerebrospinal fluid (≥51% at 15 mg and ≥76% at ≥50 mg) Aβ peptides were seen, including prolonged suppression even with a QW dosing regimen. AZD3293 is the only BACE1 inhibitor for which prolonged suppression of plasma Aβ with a QW dosing schedule has been reported. Two Phase III studies of AZD3293 (AMARANTH, NCT02245737; and DAYBREAK-ALZ, NCT02783573) are now ongoing.

A growing body of pathological, biomarker, genetic, and mechanistic data suggests that amyloid accumulation, as a result of changes in production, processing, and/or clearance of brain amyloid-β peptide (Aβ) concentrations, plays a key role in the pathogenesis of Alzheimer's disease (AD). Beta-secretase 1 (BACE1) mediates the first step in the processing of amyloid-β protein precursor (AβPP) to Aβ peptides, with the soluble N terminal fragment of AβPP (sAβPPβ) as a direct product, and BACE1 inhibition is an attractive target for therapeutic intervention to reduce the production of Aβ. Here, we report the in vitro and in vivo pharmacological profile of AZD3293, a potent, highly permeable, orally active, blood-brain barrier (BBB) penetrating, BACE1 inhibitor with unique slow off-rate kinetics. The in vitro potency of AZD3293 was demonstrated in several cellular models, including primary cortical neurons. In vivo in mice, guinea pigs, and dogs, AZD3293 displayed significant dose- and time-dependent reductions in plasma, cerebrospinal fluid, and brain concentrations of Aβ40, Aβ42, and sAβPPβ. The in vitro potency of AZD3293 in mouse and guinea pig primary cortical neuronal cells was correlated to the in vivo potency expressed as free AZD3293 concentrations in mouse and guinea pig brains. In mice and dogs, the slow off-rate from BACE1 may have translated into a prolongation of the observed effect beyond the turnover rate of Aβ. The preclinical data strongly support the clinical development of AZD3293, and patients with AD are currently being recruited into a combined Phase 2/3 study to test the disease-modifying properties of AZD3293.