Search

Purpose: For many malignancies, considerable divergence between the efficacy found in clinical trials and effectiveness in routine practice have been reported (efficacy–effectiveness gap). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy–effectiveness gap in palliative first-line (1L) chemotherapy treatment (CTx) for urothelial carcinoma of the bladder. Methods: From seven Dutch teaching hospitals, all patients diagnosed with unresectable stage III (cT2-4aN1-3M0) and IV (cT4b and/or cM1) disease, who received 1L-CTx (for both primary as recurrent disease after radical cystectomy) between 2008 and 2016, were captured. Results were compared with data from seven randomised trials that investigated 1L gemcitabine + cisplatin (GemCis) and/or gemcitabine + carboplatin (GemCarbo). Results: Of the 835 included patients, 191 received 1L-CTx. Median overall survival (mOS) of GemCis patients (N = 88) was 10.4 months [95% CI 7.9–13.0], which was shorter compared to clinical trial findings (range mOS: 12.7–14.3 months) despite comparable clinical characteristics. The mOS of GemCarbo patients (N = 92) was 9.3 months [95% CI 7.5–11.1]. Patients who received GemCarbo had worse prognostic characteristics (higher age, impaired renal function and worse performance status (all P-values < 0.001)) compared to GemCis patients, but were equal in occurrence of dose reductions (24.4% vs. 29.5%, P-value = 0.453), early termination (55.7% vs. 54.1%, P-value = 0.839), clinical best response (P-value = 0.733), and toxicity (68.1% vs. 63.3%, P-value = 0.743). In multivariable regression, GemCis was not superior to GemCarbo (HR 0.90 [95% CI 0.55–1.47], P-value = 0.674). Conclusion: There seems to be an efficacy–effectiveness gap in 1L GemCis treatment, despite patients having similar baseline characteristics. Early termination of treatment occurred more often and dose reduction less often compared to clinical trials, hinting towards abandonment of treatment in case of adverse events. Patients treated with 1L GemCis did not have superior survival compared to GemCarbo patients, even though GemCarbo patients had worse baseline characteristics. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Population-based studies on treatment patterns in oncology and corresponding clinical outcomes can help identify strategies towards optimal value for patients. This study was performed to describe the variation in treatment patterns and major oncological outcomes for muscle-invasive or metastatic bladder cancer (MIBC/mBC) patients in the Netherlands. Methods: Patients diagnosed with cT2-4aN0-3M0-1 disease between 2008 and 2016 in seven large teaching hospitals in the Netherlands were included. Baseline characteristics, disease stage, intended and definitive treatment, and oncological outcomes were collected. Patients were categorized based on cTNM-stage: (1) cT2-4aN0M0, (2) cT2-4aN1-3M0 and (3) cT4b and/or M1. Results: The total study population comprised 1853 patients, of which 1303 patients were diagnosed with cT2-4aN0M0 disease. Overall, curative treatment was intended in 81% (range 74–85%, P value = 0.132). Radical cystectomy (RC) and curative radiotherapy (RTx) ranged between hospitals from 42 to 66% and 13 to 27%, respectively (P value < 0.001). For 334 patients staged cT4b and/or M1, frequencies for palliative therapy and best supportive care (no anti-cancer therapy) ranged between hospitals from 20 to 54% and 44 to 71%, respectively (P value < 0.001). There was no association between hospital site and overall survival (OS) in a univariable and multivariable Cox regression for survival analysis (after adjusting for age and cT-stage), for all three cTNM-groups. Neoadjuvant or induction chemotherapy (NAIC) utilization rates before RC ranged from 8 to 38% (P value < 0.001). Conclusions: There is large inter-hospital variation in treatment intent in MIBC/mBC patients. This variation does not seem to translate to differences in overall survival rates. There is an ongoing trend of increased use of RC. Utilisation of NAIC is relatively low considering European guideline recommendations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Pancreatic cancer is one of the five most common causes of cancer mortality in developed countries. In patients with metastatic disease, the most frequent treatment used is FOLFIRINOX, which is associated with moderate toxicity which could influence quality of life. The efficacy of FOLFIRINOX in a general population in the Netherlands has not been subject of research before, and therefore, this research has been set up in order to investigate what the real-life benefits of FOLFIRINOX are in a population with metastatic pancreatic cancer (mPC) treated in three general hospitals in the Netherlands., Methods: The data used in this study was collected by patient records leading to a noninterventional retrospective cohort study. Eighty-six patients, over 18 years of age, diagnosed with mPC between the years 2015 and 2022 and treated with FOLFIRINOX at Maasstad Hospital in Rotterdam, Amphia Hospital in Breda, or Catharina Hospital in Eindhoven, were included in the study. Kaplan-Meier models were used in order to represent survival outcomes., Results: The results showed a median overall survival of 228 days (IQR 118-355). Only 14.0% (n = 12) completed the first-line treatment, and 51.2% (n = 44) of patients stopped treatment before or during cycle 6. Toxicity is highest, grade 3, after the first cycle but remains high for grade 1 and 2 during all treatment cycles., Conclusion: Survival rates for patient with metastatic pancreatic cancer treated with FOLFIRINOX were worse in our study population than in comparative studies., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)

Due to alternative splicing, the SLCO1B3 gene encodes two protein variants; the hepatic uptake transporter liver-type OATP1B3 (Lt-OATP1B3) and the cancer-type OATP1B3 (Ct-OATP1B3) expressed in several cancerous tissues. There is limited information about the cell type-specific transcriptional regulation of both variants and about transcription factors regulating this differential expression. Therefore, we cloned DNA fragments from the promoter regions of the Lt-SLCO1B3 and the Ct-SLCO1B3 gene and investigated their luciferase activity in hepatocellular and colorectal cancer cell lines. Both promoters showed differences in their luciferase activity depending on the used cell lines. We identified the first 100 bp upstream of the transcriptional start site as the core promoter region of the Ct-SLCO1B3 gene. In silico predicted binding sites for the transcription factors ZKSCAN3, SOX9 and HNF1α localized within these fragments were further analyzed. The mutagenesis of the ZKSCAN3 binding site reduced the luciferase activity of the Ct-SLCO1B3 reporter gene construct in the colorectal cancer cell lines DLD1 and T84 to 29.9% and 14.3%, respectively. In contrast, using the liver-derived Hep3B cells, 71.6% residual activity could be measured. This indicates that the transcription factors ZKSCAN3 and SOX9 are important for the cell type-specific transcriptional regulation of the Ct-SLCO1B3 gene.

Cancer-type organic anion transporting polypeptide 1B3 (Ct-OATP1B3), a splice variant of the hepatic uptake transporter OATP1B3 (liver-type; Lt-OATP1B3), is expressed in several tumor entities including colorectal carcinoma (CRC) and breast cancer. In CRC, high OATP1B3 expression has been associated with reduced progression-free and overall survival. Several kinase inhibitors used for antitumor treatment are substrates and/or inhibitors of OATP1B3 (e.g. encorafenib, vemurafenib). The functional importance of Ct-OATP1B3 has not been elucidated so far. HEK293 cells stably overexpressing Ct-OATP1B3 protein were established and compared with control cells. Confocal laser scanning microscopy, immunoblot, and proteomics-based expression analysis demonstrated that Ct-OATP1B3 protein is intracellularly localized in lysosomes of stably-transfetced cells. Cytotoxicity experiments showed that cells recombinantly expressing the Ct-OATP1B3 protein were more resistant against the kinase inhibitor encorafenib compared to control cells [e.g. encorafenib (100 µM) survival rates: 89.5% vs. 52.8%]. In line with these findings, colorectal cancer DLD1 cells endogenously expressing Ct-OATP1B3 protein had poorer survival rates when the OATP1B3 substrate bromosulfophthalein (BSP) was coincubated with encorafenib or vemurafenib compared to the incubation with the kinase inhibitor alone. This indicates a competitive inhibition of Ct-OATP1B3-mediated uptake into lysosomes by BSP. Accordingly, mass spectrometry-based drug analysis of lysosomes showed a reduced lysosomal accumulation of encorafenib in DLD1 cells additionally exposed to BSP. These results demonstrate that Ct-OATP1B3 protein is localized in the lysosomal membrane and can mediate transport of certain kinase inhibitors into lysosomes revealing a new mechanism of resistance. Significance Statement We describe the characterization of a splice variant of the liver-type uptake transporter OATP1B3 expressed in several tumor entities. This variant is localized in lysosomes mediating resistance against kinase inhibitors which are substrates of this transport protein by transporting them into lysosomes and thereby reducing the cytoplasmic concentration of these antitumor agents. Therefore, the expression of the Ct-OATP1B3 protein is associated with a better survival of cells revealing a new mechanism of drug resistance., (Copyright © 2020 American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.)

Organic Cation Transporter 1 (OCT1, gene symbol: SLC22A1 ) is predominately expressed in human liver, localized in the basolateral membrane of hepatocytes and facilitates the uptake of endogenous compounds (e.g. serotonin, acetylcholine, thiamine), and widely prescribed drugs (e.g. metformin, fenoterol, morphine). Furthermore, exogenous compounds such as MPP + , ASP + and Tetraethylammonium can be used as prototypic substrates to study the OCT1-mediated transport in vitro . Single-transfected cell lines recombinantly overexpressing OCT1 (e.g., HEK-OCT1) were established to study OCT1-mediated uptake and to evaluate transporter-mediated drug-drug interactions in vitro . Furthermore, double-transfected cell models simultaneously overexpressing basolaterally localized OCT1 together with an apically localized export protein have been established. Most of these cell models are based on polarized grown MDCK cells and can be used to analyze transcellular transport, mimicking the transport processes e.g. during the hepatobiliary elimination of drugs. Multidrug and toxin extrusion protein 1 (MATE1, gene symbol: SLC47A1 ) and the ATP-driven efflux pump P-glycoprotein (P-gp, gene symbol: ABCB1 ) are both expressed in the canalicular membrane of human hepatocytes and are described as transporters of organic cations. OCT1 and MATE1 have an overlapping substrate spectrum, indicating an important interplay of both transport proteins during the hepatobiliary elimination of drugs. Due to the important role of OCT1 for the transport of endogenous compounds and drugs, in vitro cell systems are important for the determination of the substrate spectrum of OCT1, the understanding of the molecular mechanisms of polarized transport, and the investigation of potential drug-drug interactions. Therefore, the aim of this review article is to summarize the current knowledge on cell systems recombinantly overexpressing human OCT1., Competing Interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2021 Haberkorn, Fromm and König.)

Background: Pancreatic cancer has a very poor prognosis. Best practices for the use of chemotherapy, enzyme replacement therapy, and biliary drainage have been identified but their implementation in daily clinical practice is often suboptimal. We hypothesized that a nationwide program to enhance implementation of these best practices in pancreatic cancer care would improve survival and quality of life., Methods/design: PACAP-1 is a nationwide multicenter stepped-wedge cluster randomized controlled superiority trial. In a per-center stepwise and randomized manner, best practices in pancreatic cancer care regarding the use of (neo)adjuvant and palliative chemotherapy, pancreatic enzyme replacement therapy, and metal biliary stents are implemented in all 17 Dutch pancreatic centers and their regional referral networks during a 6-week initiation period. Per pancreatic center, one multidisciplinary team functions as reference for the other centers in the network. Key best practices were identified from the literature, 3 years of data from existing nationwide registries within the Dutch Pancreatic Cancer Project (PACAP), and national expert meetings. The best practices follow the Dutch guideline on pancreatic cancer and the current state of the literature, and can be executed within daily clinical practice. The implementation process includes monitoring, return visits, and provider feedback in combination with education and reminders. Patient outcomes and compliance are monitored within the PACAP registries. Primary outcome is 1-year overall survival (for all disease stages). Secondary outcomes include quality of life, 3- and 5-year overall survival, and guideline compliance. An improvement of 10% in 1-year overall survival is considered clinically relevant. A 25-month study duration was chosen, which provides 80% statistical power for a mortality reduction of 10.0% in the 17 pancreatic cancer centers, with a required sample size of 2142 patients, corresponding to a 6.6% mortality reduction and 4769 patients nationwide., Discussion: The PACAP-1 trial is designed to evaluate whether a nationwide program for enhanced implementation of best practices in pancreatic cancer care can improve 1-year overall survival and quality of life., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03513705. Trial opened for accrual on 22th May 2018.

Purpose: To prospectively evaluate participants' experience and preference of magnetic resonance (MR) colonography with limited bowel preparation compared with full-preparation colonoscopy in participants at increased risk for colorectal cancer., Materials and Methods: This study had institutional review board approval; all participants gave written informed consent. In this multicenter study, consecutive participants undergoing conventional colonoscopy because of a personal or family history of colorectal cancer or adenomatous polyps underwent MR colonography 2 weeks prior to colonoscopy. They all followed a low-fiber diet and were given lactulose and an oral contrast agent (fecal tagging with gadolinium) 2 days before colonography. Before imaging, spasmolytics were administered intravenously, and a water-gadolinium chelate mixture was administered rectally for distention of the colon. Breath-hold T1- and T2-weighted sequences were performed in the prone and supine positions. Participant experience in terms of, for example, pain and burden was determined by using a five-point scale and was evaluated with a Wilcoxon signed rank test; participant preference was determined by using a seven-point scale and was evaluated with the chi2 statistic after dichotomizing., Results: Two hundred nine participants (77 women, 132 men; mean age, 58 years; range, 23-84 years) were included. One hundred forty-eight participants received sedatives (midazolam) and/or analgesics (fentanyl) during colonoscopy. Participants rated the MR colonography bowel preparation as less burdensome (P<.001) compared with the colonoscopy bowel preparation (10% and 71% of participants rated the respective examinations moderately to extremely burdensome). Participants also experienced less pain at MR colonography (P<.001) and found MR colonography less burdensome (P<.001). Immediately after both examinations, 69% of participants preferred MR colonography, 22% preferred colonoscopy, and 9% were indifferent (P<.001, 69% vs 22%). After 5 weeks, 65% preferred MR colonography and 26% preferred colonoscopy (P<.001)., Conclusion: Participants preferred MR colonography without extensive cleansing to colonoscopy immediately after both examinations and 5 weeks later. Experience of the bowel preparation and of the procedure was rated better., (Copyright (c) RSNA, 2007.)

Purpose: To prospectively evaluate the diagnostic performance of magnetic resonance (MR) colonography by using limited bowel preparation in patients with polyps of 10 mm or larger in diameter in a population at increased risk for colorectal cancer, with optical colonoscopy as the reference standard., Materials and Methods: The institutional review boards of all three hospitals approved the study. All patients provided written informed consent. In this multicenter study, patients undergoing colonoscopy because of a personal or family history of colorectal cancer or adenomatous polyps were included. Two blinded observers independently evaluated T1- and T2-weighted MR colonographic images obtained with limited bowel preparation (bright-lumen fecal tagging) for the presence of polyps. The limited bowel preparation consisted of a low-fiber diet, with ingestion of lactulose and an oral gadolinium-based contrast agent (with all three major meals) starting 48 hours prior to imaging. Results were verified with colonoscopic outcomes. Patient sensitivity, patient specificity, polyp sensitivity, and interobserver agreement for lesions of 10 mm or larger were calculated for both observers individually and combined., Results: Two hundred patients (mean age, 58 years; 128 male patients) were included; 41 patients had coexistent symptoms. At colonoscopy, 12 patients had 22 polyps of 10 mm or larger. Per-patient sensitivity was 58% (seven of 12) for observer 1, 67% (eight of 12) for observer 2, and 75% (nine of 12) for both observers combined for polyps of 10 mm or larger. Per-patient specificity was 95% (178 of 188) for observer 1, 97% (183 of 188) for observer 2, and 93% (175 of 188) for both observers combined. Per-polyp sensitivity was 55% (12 of 22) for observer 1, 50% (11 of 22) for observer 2, and 77% (17 of 22) for both observers combined. Interobserver agreement was 93% for identification of patients with lesions of 10 mm or larger., Conclusion: In patients at increased risk for colorectal cancer, specificity of MR colonography by using limited bowel preparation was high, but sensitivity was modest.

Purpose: To prospectively compare three strategies of magnetic resonance colonography (MRC) with fecal tagging., Materials and Methods: Three strategies were compared: (S1) gadolinium as oral tagging agent and a gadolinium-water mixture for rectal filling (bright lumen), (S2) oral barium and water rectally, and (S3) oral barium and air rectally. In S2 and S3 (both dark lumen) gadolinium was injected intravenously. Three-dimensional (3D) T1-weighted and two-dimensional (2D) T2-weighted sequences were used. Two observers scored diagnostic confidence and image quality (contrast, homogeneity, artifacts), analyzed by chi-squared and Fisher's exact test. Patient experience and preference were determined by questionnaire (Mann-Whitney test)., Results: A total of 45 patients were included, 15 were randomly assigned per strategy. Diagnostic confidence of S1 and S3 is significantly better than for S2. S1 has the additional advantage of showing significantly better contrast between bowel wall and lumen, and showing significantly better homogeneity on both T1- and T2-weighted sequences, but with significantly more artifacts on the T1-weighted sequences. S3 showed significantly better contrast and homogeneity than S2 on the T2-weighted sequences. Bowel preparation of S1 was rated significantly better. Patient preference was comparable., Conclusion: Image quality was best using the bright lumen strategy or the dark lumen strategy using air for rectal filling. Although bowel preparation was rated best using the bright lumen strategy, patient preference was comparable., (Copyright (c) 2007 Wiley-Liss, Inc.)