Search

Debris‐flow volumes can increase along their flow path by entraining sediment stored in the channel bed and banks, thus also increasing hazard potential. Theoretical considerations, laboratory experiments and field investigations all indicate that the saturation conditions of the sediment along the flow path can greatly influence the amount of sediment entrained. However, this process is usually not considered for practical applications. This study aims to close this gap by combining runout and hydrological models into a predictive framework that is calibrated and tested using unique observations of sediment erosion and debris‐flow properties available at a Swiss debris‐flow observation station (Illgraben). To this end, hourly water input to the erodible channel is predicted using a simple, process‐based hydrological model, and the resulting water saturation level in the upper sediment layer of the channel is modelled based on a Hortonian infiltration concept. Debris‐flow entrainment is then predicted using the RAMMS debris‐flow runout model. We find a strong correlation between the modelled saturation level of the sediment on the flow path and the channel‐bed erodibility for single‐surge debris‐flow events with distinct fronts, indicating that the modelled water content is a good predictor for erosion simulated in RAMMS. Debris‐flow properties with more complex flow behaviour (e.g., multiple surges or roll waves) are not as well predicted using this procedure, indicating that more physically complete models are necessary. Finally, we demonstrate how this modelling framework can be used for climate change impact assessment and show that earlier snowmelt may shift the peak of the debris‐flow season to earlier in the year. Our novel modelling framework provides a plausible approach to reproduce saturation‐dependent entrainment and thus better constrain event volumes for current and future hazard assessment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Martian gullies are landforms consisting of an erosional alcove, a channel, and a depositional apron. A significant proportion of Martian gullies at the mid‐latitudes is active today. The seasonal sublimation of CO2 ice has been suggested as a driver behind present‐day gully activity. However, due to a lack of in situ observations, the actual processes causing the observed changes remain unresolved. Here, we present results from flume experiments in environmental chambers in which we created CO2‐driven granular flows under Martian atmospheric conditions. Our experiments show that under Martian atmospheric pressure, large amounts of granular material can be fluidized by the sublimation of small quantities of CO2 ice in the granular mixture (only 0.5% of the volume fraction of the flow) under slope angles as low as 10°. Dimensionless scaling of the CO2‐driven granular flows shows that they are dynamically similar to terrestrial two‐phase granular flows, that is, debris flows and pyroclastic flows. The similarity in flow dynamics explains the similarity in deposit morphology with levees and lobes, supporting the hypothesis that CO2‐driven granular flows on Mars are not merely modifying older landforms, but they are actively forming them. This has far‐reaching implications for the processes thought to have formed these gullies over time. For other planetary bodies in our solar system, our experimental results suggest that the existence of gully like landforms is not necessarily evidence for flowing liquids but that they could also be formed or modified by sublimation‐driven flow processes. Plain Language Summary: Gullies on Mars are features that look like landforms carved by debris flows on Earth. At the top, the gullies have an erosional alcove where material is eroded and at the bottom of the gully, a fan exists where this material is deposited. For a long time, it was believed that these gullies were formed by liquid water, just like on Earth. However, Martian gullies are active today, which cannot be reconciled with the lack of liquid water on the surface of Mars. Data from satellites has shown that the activity in Martian gullies is correlated to a seasonal cycle of CO2 ice deposition and sublimation. However, we still do not know whether and how CO2 sublimation produces the observed changes in gullies. Here we show the results of experiments in environmental chambers in which we created CO2‐driven flows under Martian conditions. The experiments show that granular material can be fluidized by sublimation of CO2 ice. Furthermore, the flow dynamics and morphology of the deposits are similar to debris flows and pyroclastic flows on Earth. This explains the similarity between the Martian gullies and the water‐shaped gullies on Earth without the presence of liquid water on the surface of Mars today. Key Points: The sublimation of small amounts of CO2 ice can fluidize granular material on low slopes under Martian atmospheric pressureThe flow dynamics of CO2‐driven flows are similar to that of terrestrial fluidized two‐phase flows, for example, debris flows and dense pyroclastic flowsExperimental CO2‐driven granular flows create deposit morphologies similar to those observed in Martian gullies [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The forced vortex equation, based on the cross-stream inclination of a flow surface as it passes through a bend, is a common approach to estimating debris flow velocities. Here, we present the preliminary results of a study of superelevation and the correction factor k, used to adapt the forced vortex equation to debris flows, based on data from the Illgraben torrent in Switzerland. The definition of the radius of curvature, a factor in the calculation of superelevation velocities, is not found to exercise a large influence on the calculated velocities when using high resolution aerial images, with the choice of cross-section location and k-factor exercising a more significant influence. The k-factors found here fall within the range previously reported in the literature, ranging from approximately 1 to 7, and a previously suggested non-linear relationship with Froude numbers is evident in the dataset. Following the debris flow season of 2022, the study will be continued with additional debris flow events and the investigative methods will be extended to include high-resolution LiDAR sensors installed along the Illgraben torrent.

Erosion and entrainment of material by debris flows determine debris-flow volume growth and therefore hazard potential. Recent advances in field, laboratory, and modelling studies have distilled two driving forces behind debris-flow erosion; impact and shear forces. A third factor influencing the (relative) importance of these forces is the viscosity and abundance of the interstitial fluid in the debris flow and the bed. However, how erosion and these forces depend on the composition of the debris flow itself and the composition of the bed remains unclear. Here, we present results of small-scale flume experiments with a loosely packed erodible bed that highlight the far-reaching effects of debris-flow and bed composition on erosion processes and magnitude. We quantify the effects of gravel, clay, and solid fraction in the debris flow on bed erosion. In addition, we quantify the effects of water and clay content of the unconsolidated bed on erosion by a debris flow. We show that debris flow erosion increases linearly when the gravel fraction of a debris flow is increased, which is linked to an increase in both impact and shear forces. We find that debris flow erosion, and the related forces, are non-linearly impacted by the clay and water content of the debris flow and those of the bed. For both the clay content of the debris flow and the bed, an optimum in erosion exists around a specific clay percentage that does not directly relate to an optimum in either shear or impact forces. When the water content of the bed and/or the debris flow is increased, erosion becomes largest when supersaturated conditions occur. These conditions are unrelated to the magnitude of the two erodible forces. This shows that both clay and water content affect erosion by affecting the transfer of pore pressures from the debris flow to the bed. We can therefore conclude that impact and shear forces dictate debris flow erosion in most cases but that their (relative) importance is significantly altered by the means and effectivity of pore pressure transfer from the debris flow to the bed. The latter is highly influenced by the viscosity and abundance of the interstitial fluid of the debris flow and the composition of the bed.

Debris flows can grow greatly in size and hazardous potential by eroding bed and bank materials. However, erosion mechanisms are poorly understood because debris flows are complex hybrids between a fluid flow and a moving mass of colliding particles, bed erodibility varies between events, and field measurements are hard to obtain. Here, we (i) quantify the spatio-temporal patterns of erosion and deposition and (ii) identify the key controls on debris-flow erosion in the Illgraben (CH). We use a dataset that combines information on flow properties, antecedent rainfall, and bed and bank erosion for 13 debris flows that occurred between 2019 and 2021. We show that spatio-temporal patterns of erosion and deposition in natural debris-flow torrents can be highly variable and dynamic, and we identify a memory effect where erosion is strong at locations of strong deposition during previous flows and vice versa. We find that flow conditions and antecedent rainfall (affecting bed wetness) jointly control debris-flow erosion. We find statistically significant correlations between channel erosion/deposition and a wide range of flow conditions, including frontal flow depth, velocity, and discharge, and flow volume, cumulative shear stress and seismic energy, as well as antecedent rainfall. Overall, flow conditions describing the cumulative forces exerted at the bed during an event, such as cumulative shear stress and flow volume, best explain erosion. A shear-stress approach accounting for bed erodibility may therefore be applicable for modelling and predicting debris-flow erosion. This work can provide input for model development by identifying correlations of flow and bed conditions with erosion that models should oblige.

Deep seated landslides are common phenomena in Alpine areas. In case of a direct connectivity with the channel system, the catchment’s sediment yield and the probability of other forms of mass wasting processes such as debris flows may be increased significantly. Up to now, sediment dynamics related to deep-seated landslides and debris flows have not been quantified. The Lattenbach catchment (basin area 5,3 km², relief 2134 m) in Grins (Tyrol, Austria), is an example for an active DF-site, where there is geomorphological evidence of deep-seated landslide activity. In this study we shed light (1) on the location and size of active landslides in the catchment, that may deliver sediment to the channel system. Furthermore, we want to (2) quantify the contributed sediment volumes by these landslides (3) and estimate the exported sediment by debris flow. We apply an image correlation algorithm to high resolution ALS and TLS terrain models of derived over a period of 14 years to calculate surface movement rates within the catchment and locate deep seated landslide activity. We further assess the sediment yield of these landslides to the channel system and relate that with DF-volumes measured by a monitoring station at the catchment outlet. We find that there are five deep-seated landslide bodies directly connected to the channel system in the catchment. These are the largest source of sediment and significantly increases the overall sediment yield of the catchment. Our study shall contribute to the limited knowledge about the importance of deep-seated landslides for sediment dynamics and debris-flow activity, as their presence is predicted to be more frequent in the wake of global warming.

Pore‐fluid pressure (PP) plays an important role in bed erosion, but the mechanisms that control PP evolution and the resulting feedbacks on flow dynamics are unclear. Here, we develop a general formulation, allowing quantification of the propensity for PP evolution of saturated and unsaturated bed sediments. We conduct erosion experiments by systematically varying grain composition and water content of beds, for investigating effects of PP evolution on flow erosion. With increasing water content, PP shows a slight rise in deforming beds with drained behavior but significant larger rise in undrained beds. Regardless of bed composition, the erosion rate of beds presents a synchronous change tendency with PP evolution due to the loss in basal friction. PP instigates positive feedback that induces a remarkable gain of flow velocity and momentum on wet beds with undrained behavior. Our results help explain observations of volume growth and long run out of debris flows. Plain Language Summary: Debris flows are common geophysical flows consisting of debris grains and muddy water. Debris flows can grow significantly in volume and mobility as they pick up loose sediment from gully bed and banks. The destructive potential of debris flows increases with increasing flow volume and run out. This brings about great challenges for effective early warning of debris flows, design of prevention measures and mapping of hazard zones related to human settlements. It is commonly believed that flow momentum is consumed by carrying static bed sediments. However, flows can gain momentum by overriding wet bed sediments. This can be explained by pore‐pressure generation as debris flows move across wet beds. The increase of measured pore‐fluid pressure is limited for beds with a low water content, but substantial for beds with a higher water content, which strongly affects the erosion rates of bed sediments. Flow velocity and momentum on wet beds are observed to increase significantly but slightly for dryer beds as a result of the pore‐pressure feedback. These findings indicate that the debris composition of the catchment, the water content of bed sediment and the pore‐pressure development should be evaluated when making predictions on debris‐flow hazard. Key Points: Propensity for pore pressure evolution of bed sediments during debris‐flow erosion is evaluated by a Deborah numberSignificant pore pressure and accompanying intense erosion occur for wet bed sediments with undrained behaviorEnhanced pore pressure of wet bed sediments reduces flow basal friction, increasing flow mobility and runout [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]