Search

PURPOSE: Despite advances in systemic therapy, outcomes of patients with gastric cancer (GC) peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) remain poor, in part because of poor penetrance of systemic therapy into peritoneal metastasis due to the plasma-peritoneal barrier and anarchic intra-tumoral circulation. Hence, regional treatment approach with administration of chemotherapy directly into the peritoneal cavity (intraperitoneal, IP) under various conditions, combined with or without cytoreductive surgery (CRS) has remained an area of significant research interest. The purpose of this review is to provide high-level evidence for regional treatment approaches in the management of GCPC with limited peritoneal disease. METHODS: A review of the current literature and ongoing clinical trials for regional IP therapies for GCPC was performed. Studies included in this review comprise of phase III randomized controlled trials, non-randomized phase II studies, high-impact retrospective studies, and active ongoing clinical trials for each available IP modality. RESULTS: The three common IP approaches are heated intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC), normothermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (NIPEC) and more recently introduced, pressurized intraperitoneal aerosolized chemotherapy (PIPAC). These IP approaches have been combined with systemic therapy and/or CRS with varying degrees of promising results, demonstrating evidence of improvements in survival rates and peritoneal disease control. Patient selection, optimization of systemic therapy, and completeness of cytoreduction have emerged as major factors influencing the design of contemporary and ongoing trials. CONCLUSION: IP chemotherapy has a clear role in the management of patients with GCPC, and when combined with CRS in appropriately selected patients has the potential to significantly improve survival. Ongoing and upcoming IP therapy clinical trials hold great promise to shape the treatment paradigm for GCPC.

Acute kidney injury (AKI) following hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is common. Identifying patients at risk could have implications for surgical and anesthetic management. We aimed to develop a predictive model that could predict AKI based on patients preoperative characteristics and intraperitoneal chemotherapy regimen. We retrospectively gathered data of adult patients undergoing HIPEC at our health system between November 2013 and April 2022. Next, we developed a model predicting postoperative AKI using multivariable logistic regression and calculated the performance of the model (area under the receiver operating characteristics curve [AUC]) via tenfold cross-validation. A total of 412 patients were included, of which 36 (8.7%) developed postoperative AKI. Based on our multivariable logistic regression model, multiple preoperative and intraoperative characteristics were associated with AKI. We included the total intraoperative cisplatin dose, body mass index, male sex, and preoperative hemoglobin level in the final model. The mean area under the receiver operating characteristics curve value was 0.82 (95% confidence interval 0.71-0.93). Our risk model predicted AKI with high accuracy in patients undergoing HIPEC in our institution. The external validity of our model should now be tested in independent and prospective patient cohorts.

Introduction: Cytoreductive surgery combined with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS/HIPEC) has been established as an effective treatment for peritoneal cancer (PC). However, this kind of combination therapy is associated with a high lactate level. Moreover, studies have suggested that the rate of complications early after surgery directly increased with elevated lactate levels. Glucose-insulin-potassium (GIP), a potent cardioprotective intervention, has been demonstrated to adjust blood glucose (BG) levels and reduce lactate levels. However, the insulin-glucose ratio should be adjusted according to the surgery performed. Here, we aimed to evaluate the advantages of using modified GIP during CRS/HIPEC to reduce the lactate level at the end of surgery and further reduce the incidence of early postoperative complications. Methods and analysis: The modified GIP versus conventional management during surgery study is a single-center, randomized, single-blinded outcome assessment clinical trial of 80 patients with PC who are between 18 and 64 years old and undergoing CRS/HIPEC. Participants will be randomly allocated to receive modified GIP or conventional treatment (1:1). The primary outcome will be the plasma lactate level at the end of surgery. The secondary outcomes will include the highest levels and fluctuation ranges of lactate and BG during surgery, extubation time, APACHE-II score 24 h after surgery, postoperative defecation and exhaust time, postoperative lactate clearance time, postoperative liver and kidney function, incidence of complications within 7 days after surgery, length of intensive care unit stay (LIS), length of hospital stay (LHS), and total cost of hospitalization. Ethics and dissemination: The trial protocol was approved by the Scientific Research Ethics Committee of Beijing Shijitan Hospital Affiliated with Capital Medical University, approval number sjtky11-1x-2022(118). The results will be published in international peer-reviewed journals. Trial registration: ChiCTR2200057258. Registered on March 5, 2022. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Pancreatic cancer is a highly aggressive cancer with unfavorable prognosis despite the therapeutic interventions. Intraperitoneal chemotherapy has recently shown potential outcomes in the presence of peritoneal metastases. However, a consensus is still lacking on different methods for intraperitoneal chemotherapy in pancreatic cancer. A variety of drugs and doses via three types of intraperitoneal chemotherapy have been studied. The prognosis and treatment strategies for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) will be significantly influenced by peritoneal dissemination and resectability of the macroscopic disease. Normothermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (NIPEC) has been used for the treatment of peritoneal metastases of pancreatic carcinomas. Intraperitoneal chemotherapy is often combined with systemic therapies or surgical procedures which may lead to favorable combination therapies such as cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS/HIPEC). Pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) is a relatively new approach that provides a homogenous and deep penetration of the chemotherapy into the peritoneum by producing aerosols. The present study aims to review the literature for recent evidence on intraperitoneal chemotherapy in pancreatic cancer. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The selection of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) or early postoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy (EPIC) for peritoneal metastases from colorectal cancer or appendiceal neoplasms following cytoreductive surgery (CRS) depends on the surgeon's discretion. This study was designed to compare postoperative and oncologic outcomes of HIPEC and EPIC using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW). Methods: This study included 175 patients who received HIPEC or EPIC following CRS at a single tertiary university hospital between December 1999 and December 2020. Inverse probability of treatment weighting analysis was performed to control for pretreatment characteristics between the two groups. Multivariate analysis was performed to determine factors associated with postoperative and survival outcomes. Results: After IPTW, no significant differences in baseline demographics and tumor characteristics were observed between the two groups. The HIPEC group had a significantly longer operation time than the EPIC group. The EPIC group showed a significantly higher postoperative mortality rate than the HIPEC group. Operation time (odds ratio [OR] 1.01; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.01–1.02; p < 0.001), bowel anastomosis (OR 7.25; 95% CI 1.16–45.2; p = 0.034), neoadjuvant chemotherapy (OR 7.62; 95% CI 1.85–31.4; p = 0.005), and EPIC (OR 8.76; 95% CI 2.16–35.5; p = 0.002) were independent risk factors for major surgical complications. No association was observed between intraperitoneal chemotherapy type and major hematologic toxicity, overall survival, progression-free survival, or peritoneal progression-free survival. Conclusions: EPIC was a risk factor for major surgical complications. Survival outcomes were similar between the two types of intraperitoneal chemotherapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

PURPOSE: High-grade appendiceal adenocarcinomas (HGAA) with peritoneal metastases (PMs) are associated with poor survival. Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is a novel treatment approach for unresectable HGAA-PM. However, its influence on immunogenomic profiles has not yet been fully explored. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We obtained 79 samples of metastatic peritoneal tumor deposits from patients diagnosed with HGAA and performed whole-exome sequencing, RNA sequencing, and immunoprofiling before and after HIPEC. Tumor biopsies were subjected to immunogenomic profiling to detect mutational signatures and immune populations associated with oncologic outcomes. RESULTS: Fifteen patients with HGAA-PMs were included in the study. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 6.7 months (2.7-25.3) and the median overall survival was 11.4 months (4.7-42). Mucin-associated genes (MUC16 , MUC3A , and MUC5AC) and titin (TTN) had the highest mutation frequencies. Mutational signatures such as single-base substitution 29 and doublet-base substitution 11 were present in >50% of single-base and double-base mutations. Higher PD-L1 coexpression on CD8+ T cells demonstrated a higher PFS both intratumorally (P =.019) and at the margin (P =.025). CONCLUSION: HIPEC-associated mutational signatures were identified in HGAA-PMs. Elevated PD-L1+ cytotoxic T-cell populations after HIPEC had better PFS, offering valuable insights for prognostication in the context of HIPEC treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Clinical T4 (cT4) stage gastric cancer presents with frequent postoperative recurrence and poor prognosis. This study is to evaluate the oncological efficacy of laparoscopic radical total gastrectomy combined with postoperative prophylactic hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) in patients with cT4N + M0 gastric cancer who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Methods: We reviewed the clinicopathological data of 174 patients with clinical T4 gastric cancer who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by laparoscopic radical total gastrectomy between June 2017 and December 2021. Among them, 142 were included in the non-HIPEC group, and 32 in the HIPEC group. Patients in both groups were paired based on propensity score in a 2:1 ratio to assess disparities in tumor recurrence and long-term survival. Results: After matching, there were no significant differences in the clinicopathological data between the two groups. The peritoneum (16.1%) and distant organs (10.9%) were the most frequent locations for recurrence. Prior to matching, the recurrence rates were similar at all sites for both groups. Compared with those in the non-HIPEC cohort, the recurrence rates at all sites, the lung, and the peritoneum were notably lower in the HIPEC cohort. Prior to matching, the 3-year overall survival and disease-free survival rates were similar between the two groups; following matching, the HIPEC group exhibited notably greater survival rates than did the non-HIPEC group. The disparities in survival rates between the groups became even more pronounced after conducting a stratified analysis among patients with stage III disease. Conclusions: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy combined with prophylactic HIPEC after laparoscopic radical gastrectomy can effectively reduce the rate of peritoneal metastasis in patients with cT4N + M0 advanced gastric cancer and significantly improve the prognosis of such patients, which is of great clinical value. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: Pancreatic cancer with peritoneal metastasis presents a challenging prognosis, with limited effective treatment options available. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of combining cytoreductive surgery (CRS) with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) as a treatment strategy for this patient group. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on patients with peritoneal metastasis of pancreatic cancer who underwent CRS + HIPEC treatment at Beijing Shijitan Hospital from March 2017 to December 2023. The study focused on assessing clinical features, the incidence of sever adverse events (SAEs), and overall survival (OS). Results: A total of 10 patients were enrolled in this study. The median OS was 24.2 months, suggesting an improvement over traditional therapies. While SAEs were noted, including two cases of severe complications necessitating additional surgical interventions, no perioperative fatalities were recorded. The overall survival time for patients with CC0/1 was not significantly different from that of patients with CC2/3, and no prognostic predictors were identified. Conclusions: The combination of CRS and HIPEC appears to be a viable and promising treatment modality for patients with peritoneal metastasis of pancreatic cancer, offering an improved survival rate with manageable safety concerns. Further research is needed to refine patient selection criteria and to explore the long-term benefits of this approach. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Peritoneal metastatic carcinoma refers to the spread of malignant tumors from the primary site to the peritoneum. It is commonly observed in the advanced stages of various cancer types, including gastric cancer, colorectal cancer, ovarian cancer and pseudomyxoma peritonei (PMP). Peritoneal metastatic carcinoma seriously impair human health due to their high recurrence and mortality rates, and palliative treatment based on chemotherapy is usually provided after radical surgery or in the advanced stage of peritoneal metastases. The difficulties in the treatment of peritoneal metastatic carcinoma are the lack of targeted drugs and the difficulty of drugs to cross the blood-peritoneal barrier, resulting in poor systemic effects. Intraperitoneal chemotherapy, as an important therapeutic means, has a broad application prospect in the treatment of peritoneal metastatic carcinoma. In recent years, innovations in intraperitoneal chemotherapy techniques such as hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC), pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) and the development of novel drugs have significantly improved patients' quality of life. The development of novel drugs has significantly improved patient survival. However, the diversity and complexity of these diseases have led to clinical variability and uncertainty in the efficacy of intraperitoneal chemotherapy in terms of treatment strategies such as mode of administration, drug type and dose. Although evidence-based guidelines and recommended treatment strategies have been developed, there is a need to further support these regimens through additional clinical trials and higher levels of evidence-based medicine. This review summarized the development history and recent advances in intraperitoneal chemotherapy, compared and analyzed the treatments such as surgery combined with traditional IPC, HIPEC and PIPAC, and summarized the research progress of recently conducted intraperitoneal chemotherapy techniques; moreover, in terms of the clinical application of intraperitoneal chemotherapy techniques, this paper elaborated on its use in diseases such as gastric cancer, colorectal cancer, gynecological oncology, PMP, cholangiocarcinoma and pancreatic cancer. For the limitations of intraperitoneal chemotherapy technology, it is proposed that the innovative development of nanomedicine is expected to provide a safer and more effective option for the treatment of peritoneal metastatic carcinoma. In conclusion, this review summarized the latest progress, shortcomings and future development of intraperitoneal chemotherapy, with the aim of providing a feasible direction for more effective clinical treatment of peritoneal metastatic carcinoma. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Early‐onset colorectal cancer (EOCRC) incidence is increasing in Australia. However, no Australian studies have reported on EOCRC patients' surgical management and survival patterns. Methods: A retrospective study of 111 EOCRC patients treated at the Royal Prince Alfred Hospital (RPAH), Sydney, Australia between January 2013 and December 2021 was performed. RPAH is a quaternary referral centre for pelvic exenteration (PE) and cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS/HIPEC). Results: Most patients had left‐sided tumours (76.58%) and stage IV disease at the time of presentation (37.85%). 27.93% of patients underwent either CRS/HIPEC and PE and 72.07% of patients underwent other colorectal resections of which the most common was low anterior resection (19.82%). A stoma was fashioned in 50.54% of patients. Complications occurred in 54.95% of patients of which most were Clavien‐Dindo grade II (47.54%). Absolute 1‐, 3‐ and 5‐year time intervals were 93.69%, 87.39% and 85.48%. Disease‐free and overall survival were poorer in stage IV patients who had PE, followed by CRS/HIPEC then other colorectal resections (P < 0.001 and P = 0.003). Conclusions: Stoma formation, PE and CRS/HIPEC and minor postoperative complications were common in our EOCRC cohort. Despite this, the 5‐year absolute survival rate was acceptable. Thus, an aggressive surgical approach in EOCRC patients at a quaternary referral centre may be feasible at the cost of greater postoperative morbidity. This information is imperative in the surgical consent and preoperative counselling of EOCRC patients and highlights the need for further research to assess the postoperative functional outcomes and quality of life of EOCRC patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) coupled with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is a potentially curative approach to peritoneal disease (PD) and corresponds to the needs of patients with dire survival rates. However, the oncological community remains cautious toward this procedure because of its significant morbidity and mortality rates. This evolving evidence around CRS and HIPEC and its impact suggests a need for more standardized procedures in existing centers. Because of its complexity and potential for high morbidity and mortality, critical observation of our center's complication rates using complication management documentation tools were crucial to further develop our standard operating procedures (SOP) and maximize patient safety. Methods: Our prospectively maintained institutional database was queried to identify all patients who underwent CRS and HIPEC and had a filled-out quality management (QM) and complication management documentation tool at discharge at the surgical department of the Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Virchow Klinikum, Berlin, Germany, between January 2018 and December 2023. Results: A total of 155 patients had a surgical and/or medical complication recorded. In total, 305 surgeries were surveyed. Some patients had more than one postoperative complication; hence, 344 events in 50 categories were recorded, of which 267 were graded 3a or higher in 92 patients. The most common medical complications were of pulmonary and renal origin. On the surgical side, surgical site infections (SSI) were most common. The incidence of anastomotic leakage (AL) was 5% (n = 8), with no events between 2021 and the present. Patients with longer surgery duration times were at higher risk for developing postoperative complications. Conclusions: Major abdominal surgeries like CRS and HIPEC are associated with significant patient morbidity despite achieving optimal oncological outcomes. Postoperative complications are managed through strict surveillance and transparency, particularly in our large reference centers, to minimize patient risk. Quality management programs in our department have successfully maintained high standards of care without compromising patient safety. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Ovarian cancer is one of the most frequent malignancies in women. The treatment landscape underwent significant changes as new agents were introduced in ovarian cancer management over the last decade. We present two cases of long responses to Olaparib in BRCA (BReast CAncer gene) mutant ovarian cancer patients. The first case belongs to a 42-year-old female diagnosed with advanced ovarian carcinoma with a rare germinal mutation (BRCA1 c.68_69delAG, commonly found in descendants of Ashkenazi Jewish populations, but also Arabic and Asian ones) and a significant family history of ovarian and breast cancers. After poorly tolerated neoadjuvant chemotherapy, the patient underwent total hysterectomy, bilateral adnexectomy, and intraperitoneal hyperthermic chemotherapy. After eight months, the disease progressed, and first-line platinum chemotherapy was administered. Although not well-tolerated (grade 3 anemia, allergic reactions), chemotherapy resulted in a partial response, and given the patient's characteristics, maintenance with Olaparib was recommended. Treatment is ongoing (total current duration 69 months) and tolerated well (grade 1 side effects). This case illustrates the long-term benefits that novel therapies like Olaparib may offer in patients with platinum-sensitive relapsed ovarian cancer harboring a rare BRCA mutation. The second case highlights a 55-year-old postmenopausal woman diagnosed with ovarian cancer, FIGO stage IVA. Initial treatment included six cycles of chemotherapy, which led to a partial response, followed by interval debulking surgery and another four cycles of chemotherapy. Subsequent Olaparib maintenance therapy post BRCA1 mutation identification contributed to a significant progression-free survival of 65 months until disease recurrence and secondary cytoreductive surgery, showcasing the effectiveness of PARP inhibitors in personalized oncology treatment of ovarian cancer. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Several abdominal-located cancers develop metastasis within the peritoneum, what is called peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC), constituting a clinical challenge in their therapeutical management, often leading to poor prognoses. Current multidisciplinary strategies, including cytoreductive surgery (CRS), hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC), and pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC), demonstrate efficacy but have limitations. In response, alternative strategies are explored in the drug delivery field for intraperitoneal chemotherapy. Controlled drug delivery offers a promising avenue, maintaining localized drug concentrations for optimal PC management. Drug delivery systems (DDS), including hydrogels, implants, nanoparticles, and hybrid systems, show potential for sustained and region-specific drug release. The present review aims to offer an overview of the advances and current designs of DDS for PC chemotherapy administration, focusing on their composition, main characteristics, and principal experimental outcomes, highlighting the importance of biomaterial rationale design and in vitro/vivo models for their testing. Moreover, since clinical data for human subjects are scarce, we offer a critical discussion of the gap between bench and bedside in DDS translation, emphasizing the need for further research. [Display omitted] • Emphasis on the chemical and structural properties of drug delivery systems (DDS) for intraperitoneal chemotherapy (IPEC). • Analysis of key findings and clinical potential from testing DDS formulations on in vitro and in vivo cancer models. • Overview of the patent landscape and clinical trials, identifying development constraints to bridge the translational gap. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and Objectives: Cisplatin is a chemotherapeutic drug that is frequently used with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). Cisplatin-induced gonadotoxicity leads to a depletion of the ovarian reserve, causing premature ovarian insufficiency. This study aimed to investigate the impact of hyperthermia on cisplatin-induced ovarian toxicity and to determine whether sevoflurane or desflurane could be a more appropriate choice of anesthetic for reducing ovarian toxicity in HIPEC procedures. Materials and Methods: A total of 24 New Zealand rabbits were randomly divided into 4 groups as follows: Group H: HIPEC (cisplatin 7 mg/kg), Group HS: HIPEC (cisplatin 7 mg/kg) + 3% sevoflurane (2 h), Group HD: HIPEC (cisplatin 7 mg/kg) + 6% desflurane (2 h), and Group C: Control (Saline). Two catheters were placed in the abdominal cavity, the upper and lower quadrants. The perfusate was heated to 42 °C and given intraperitoneally for 90 min at a rate of 4 mL/min by catheters. Ovarian tissues were collected for Hematoxylin and Eosin staining and immunohistochemical analysis. Results: The primary follicle number was significantly decreased in Group H and HD compared to the C group (p < 0.05). Bax expression was high in Group H, according to all groups (p < 0.0001). Bax expression significantly decreased after sevoflurane, compared to group H (p = 0.012). The bcl-2 expression decreased in all groups compared to the C group. Bcl-2 expression was increased with sevoflurane compared to the H group (p = 0.001). Caspase 3 and p53 expression increased in all groups compared to the C group. p53 expression was decreased with sevoflurane and desflurane compared to the H group (p = 0.002, p = 0.008, respectively). Conclusions: The application of cisplatin with the intraoperative HIPEC method caused ovarian damage. According to our results, sevoflurane anesthesia could be a better option in mitigating cell death I the n ovarian reserve (follicle count) and apoptosis in the HIPEC procedures. We think that our findings should be supported by large series of clinical and experimental studies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Many patients undergoing major abdominal surgery experience changes in their albumin levels, but the impact of this on their recovery is not well understood. Our research focused on patients who had cytoreductive surgery and a special chemotherapy treatment during surgery. We looked at how albumin levels changed from the time of surgery until three days after surgery and whether these changes were linked to major complications. We found that patients whose albumin levels dropped significantly during surgery were more likely to have serious complications. By tracking albumin levels, we might better predict and manage complications after this type of surgery. Our findings suggest that monitoring albumin could improve patient outcomes in the future. The clinical consequences of perioperative albumin extravasation accompanying major abdominal surgery remain underexplored. We retrospectively reviewed the data of patients who underwent cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraoperative peritoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). Parameters of albumin kinetics, including serum albumin concentration decrease (∆Alb) and extravasated albumin level (Albshift), were assessed from surgery until postoperative day (POD) 3. Logistic regression analysis identified factors associated with major complications. The association of albumin kinetics with major complications was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. Serum albumin levels decreased during surgery and subsequently increased. Of the 121 analyzed patients, 25 (21%) developed major complications. The ∆Alb and Albshift during surgery and on POD 3 were greater in patients who developed major complications than in those who did not (12 ± 12 vs. 6 ± 14, p = 0.032, and 127.5 (71.9) vs. 48.5 (44.9), p < 0.001, respectively). Perioperative ∆Alb and Albshift were associated with major complications. The areas under the ROC curve of Albshift during the 3 days post-surgery and Albshift on POD 3 were 0.843 and 0.910, respectively. Albshift during the 3 days post-surgery and Albshift on POD 3 were correlated with complications (p < 0.05). In conclusion, perioperative albumin loss was associated with major complications in patients undergoing CRS and HIPEC. Albshift was associated with serious complications. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Appendiceal mucinous neoplasms are rare and can be associated with the development of disseminated peritoneal disease known as pseudomyxoma peritonei (PMP). Mucinous tumours identified on appendicectomy are therefore followed up to assess for recurrence and the development of PMP. In addition, individuals who initially present with PMP and are treated with cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS/HIPEC) are followed up to assess for recurrence. However, despite the concerted efforts of multiple expert groups, the optimal imaging follow-up protocol is yet to be established. The purpose of this article is to review the available evidence for imaging surveillance in these populations to identify the optimum post-resection imaging follow-up protocol. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Nutritional status is closely related to the outcomes of cytoreductive surgery combined with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS-HIPEC). However, the prognostic value of the Controlling Nutritional Status (CONUT) score in CRS-HIPEC has not yet been investigated. This study evaluated the predictive power of the CONUT score for mortality and postoperative complications after CRS-HIPEC. We found that patients with high CONUT score exhibited significantly higher 1-year mortality and postoperative complication rates than those with low CONUT score. Notably, a high CONUT score was identified as an independent risk factor for 1-year mortality and postoperative complications. These results suggest the potential of the CONUT score as a robust risk stratification tool for identifying high-risk patients within the CRS-HIPEC surgical demographic. The Controlling Nutritional Status (CONUT) score is a novel nutritional index that integrates the serum albumin level, peripheral blood lymphocyte count, and total cholesterol level. This retrospective study explores its prognostic significance in patients undergoing cytoreductive surgery combined with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS-HIPEC). We included 436 patients who underwent CRS-HIPEC, categorized into low (0–3) and high (4–12) CONUT score groups, and performed logistic regression analysis to predict one-year mortality and postoperative morbidity. Our findings revealed that high CONUT scores correlate with increased one-year mortality (47.1% vs. 20.3%, p < 0.001) and morbidity (39.2% vs. 18.2%, p < 0.001) compared to low CONUT scores. Multivariable regression analysis confirmed high CONUT scores as independent predictors of one-year mortality (odds ratio: 2.253, 95% CI: 1.014–5.005, p = 0.046) and postoperative morbidity (odds ratio: 2.201, 95% CI: 1.066–4.547, p = 0.033). These results underscore the CONUT score's effectiveness as an independent marker for evaluating risks associated with CRS-HIPEC, emphasizing its potential to improve risk stratification. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Peritoneal sarcomatosis has traditionally been characterized by a poor prognosis and few effective treatment options. Improving radical surgery procedures with high percentages of complete cytoreduction and limited morbidity in centers with considerable experience, together with new systemic treatments associated with evolutionary development in oncology, may modify this concept. The wide histological variability of soft tissue sarcomas that can cause peritoneal sarcomatosis prompts its evaluation and treatment by expert multidisciplinary teams. An updated review of the scientific evidence in this regard and the consensus regarding recommendations for the adequate management of this condition represent the main objective of this study. Peritoneal sarcomatosis is a rare malignant disease with a poor prognosis, secondary to peritoneal dissemination of abdominopelvic soft tissue sarcomas. Its rarity, together with the characteristic histological heterogeneity and the historically poor response to systemic treatments, has prevented the establishment of widely accepted treatment criteria with curative intent. In this sense, radical cytoreductive surgery (CRS) with peritonectomy procedures and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC), widely used in peritoneal carcinomatosis with excellent results, have not had the same evolutionary development in patients with peritoneal sarcomatosis. A multidisciplinary working group of experts in sarcomas and peritoneal oncological surgery established a series of recommendations based on current scientific evidence for the management of peritoneal sarcomatosis, taking into account the different histological subgroups of abdominopelvic sarcomas that can cause it depending on their origin: retroperitoneal sarcomas, uterine sarcomas, and visceral/peritoneal sarcomas of GIST (gastrointestinal stromal tumor) and non-GIST origin. This article shows the results of sarcoma experts' voting on the recommendations presented during the I Ibero-American Consensus on the Management of Peritoneal Sarcomatosis, which took place during the recent celebration of the III Hispanic-Portuguese Meeting for Updates on the Treatment of Sarcomas. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) is characterized by a high recurrence rate and mortality following cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC), primarily due to incomplete cancer elimination. To enhance the standard of care for PC, we developed two cationic liposomal formulations aimed at localizing a toll-like receptor agonist, resiquimod (R848), in the peritoneal cavity to activate the immune system locally to specifically eradicate residual tumor cells. These formulations effectively extended R848 retention in the peritoneum by >10-fold, resulting in up to a 2-fold increase in interferon α (IFN-α) induction in the peritoneal fluid, without increasing the plasma levels. In a CT26 colon cancer model with peritoneal metastases, these liposomal R848 formulations, when combined with oxaliplatin (OXA)—an agent used in HIPEC that induces immunogenic cell death—increased tumor infiltration of effector immune cells, including DCs, CD4, and CD8 T cells. This led to the complete elimination of PC in 60–70% of the mice, while the control mice reached humane endpoints by 30 days. The cured mice developed specific antitumor immunity, as re-challenging them with the same tumor cells did not result in tumor establishment. However, inoculation with a different tumor line led to tumor development. Additionally, exposing CT26 tumor antigens to the splenocytes isolated from the cured mice induced the expansion of CD4 and CD8 T cells and the release of IFN-γ, demonstrating long-term immune memory to the specific tumor. The anti-tumor efficacy of these liposomal R848 formulations was mediated via CD8 T cells with different levels of involvement of CD4 and B cells, and the combination with an anti-PD-1 antibody achieved a cure rate of 90%. [Display omitted] • Cationic liposomes loaded with resiquimod extended retention in the peritoneum. • Resiquimod-loaded liposomes with oxaliplatin eradicated PC in 60–70% of mice. • Cured mice developed long-term, specific anti-tumor immunity. • In combination with anti-PD-1therapy, the treatment achieved a 90% cure rate in mice. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: The present study aimed to analyze of uterine smooth muscle tumors of uncertain malignant potential (STUMP) and the outcomes of patients with STUMP. Material and methods: In this retrospective study, the data of patients diagnosed with STUMP in a single tertiary center between January 2005--January 2020 were reviewed. We assessed the demographic variables, treatment outcomes, time until recurrence, disease-free and overall survival of the patients. Results: Twenty-five patients diagnosed with STUMP were included in the study. The mean age of the patients was 43.2 ± 10.3 years. Thirteen of the 25 patients (52%) were treated by myomectomy, others received diagnoses following hysterectomy. The median follow-up time was 45.2 months. Recurrence was observed in three cases (12%), two of which were followed up without hysterectomy, and the third patient died by peritonitis carcinomatosa 60 months after diagnosis although she received cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) treatment. Conclusions: This study evaluates the data of patients with STUMP. Our results reveal a STUMP recurrence of 12%, like those previously reported in the literature. Despite the possibility of malignant recurrence, fertility-preserving treatment with close follow-up should be tried, because of the relatively early age at diagnosis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Peritoneal metastasis in gastric cancer has a poor prognosis and is increasing in prevalence. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy is used for advanced tumors; however, surgery is generally not considered for metastatic and unresectable diseases. Recently, conversion surgery, a treatment which aims for an R0 resection following chemotherapy, has become a novel therapeutic option with better survival rates. In addition to surgery, hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) leads to significant tumor reduction, but it is limited by its morbidity. Pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) delivers high concentrations of chemotherapy, but does not remove the tumor, making it useful mostly in palliative settings. Intraperitoneal (IP) therapy, known for its minimally invasive nature and repeatability, shows promise but requires further research. Ultimately, an integrated approach involving systemic chemotherapy, radical gastrectomy, HIPEC, PIPAC and IP chemotherapy can be used to optimize treatment outcomes of gastric cancer patients with peritoneal metastasis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Background Clinical T4 (cT4) stage gastric cancer presents with frequent postoperative recurrence and poor prognosis. This study is to evaluate the oncological efficacy of laparoscopic radical total gastrectomy combined with postoperative prophylactic hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) in patients with cT4N + M0 gastric cancer who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Methods We reviewed the clinicopathological data of 174 patients with clinical T4 gastric cancer who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by laparoscopic radical total gastrectomy between June 2017 and December 2021. Among them, 142 were included in the non-HIPEC group, and 32 in the HIPEC group. Patients in both groups were paired based on propensity score in a 2:1 ratio to assess disparities in tumor recurrence and long-term survival. Results After matching, there were no significant differences in the clinicopathological data between the two groups. The peritoneum (16.1%) and distant organs (10.9%) were the most frequent locations for recurrence. Prior to matching, the recurrence rates were similar at all sites for both groups. Compared with those in the non-HIPEC cohort, the recurrence rates at all sites, the lung, and the peritoneum were notably lower in the HIPEC cohort. Prior to matching, the 3-year overall survival and disease-free survival rates were similar between the two groups; following matching, the HIPEC group exhibited notably greater survival rates than did the non-HIPEC group. The disparities in survival rates between the groups became even more pronounced after conducting a stratified analysis among patients with stage III disease. Conclusions Neoadjuvant chemotherapy combined with prophylactic HIPEC after laparoscopic radical gastrectomy can effectively reduce the rate of peritoneal metastasis in patients with cT4N + M0 advanced gastric cancer and significantly improve the prognosis of such patients, which is of great clinical value.

Abstract Objectives Pancreatic cancer with peritoneal metastasis presents a challenging prognosis, with limited effective treatment options available. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of combining cytoreductive surgery (CRS) with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) as a treatment strategy for this patient group. Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted on patients with peritoneal metastasis of pancreatic cancer who underwent CRS + HIPEC treatment at Beijing Shijitan Hospital from March 2017 to December 2023. The study focused on assessing clinical features, the incidence of sever adverse events (SAEs), and overall survival (OS). Results A total of 10 patients were enrolled in this study. The median OS was 24.2 months, suggesting an improvement over traditional therapies. While SAEs were noted, including two cases of severe complications necessitating additional surgical interventions, no perioperative fatalities were recorded. The overall survival time for patients with CC0/1 was not significantly different from that of patients with CC2/3, and no prognostic predictors were identified. Conclusions The combination of CRS and HIPEC appears to be a viable and promising treatment modality for patients with peritoneal metastasis of pancreatic cancer, offering an improved survival rate with manageable safety concerns. Further research is needed to refine patient selection criteria and to explore the long-term benefits of this approach.

Background: Secondary treatment of recurrent colorectal peritoneal metastases after previous cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is poorly investigated. Objectives: To evaluate the overall survival outcome of secondary (repeat) CRS + HIPEC compared to palliative treatment in recurrent peritoneal disease. Methods: Patients with colorectal peritoneal metastases treated with an index CRS + HIPEC and subsequently having recurrent peritoneal disease were identified from the prospective Swedish national HIPEC registry. Patients were divided into interventional group (secondary CRS + HIPEC) or palliative group. Multivariable logistic regression, propensity-score matching, and survival outcomes were calculated. Results: Among 575 patients who underwent complete CRS between 2010 and 2021, 208 (36 %) were diagnosed with a subsequent recurrent peritoneal disease. Forty-two patients (20 %) were offered secondary CRS + HIPEC. Propensity-score matching of secondary interventional cases with palliative cases succeeded in 88 % (n = 37) in which female sex, lower peritoneal cancer index at index surgery, longer disease-free interval, and absence of extra-peritoneal metastases were identified as the most relevant matching covariates. Median OS from date of recurrence was 38 months (95%CI 30–58) in the interventional group and 19 months (95%CI: 15–24) in the palliative group (HR 0.35 95%CI: 0.20–0.63, p = 0.0004). Sensitivity analyses confirmed the results. As reference, the median OS from index CRS + HIPEC in the whole colorectal registry (n = 575) was 41 months (95%CI: 38–45). Conclusion: After matching for relevant factors, the hazard ratio for death was significantly reduced in patients who were offered a secondary CRS + HIPEC procedure for recurrent peritoneal disease. Selection bias is inherent, but survival outcomes were comparable to those achieved after the initial procedure.

Acute kidney injury (AKI) is recognized as a common complication following cytoreductive surgery combined with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS-HIPEC). Characterized by prolonged renal function impairment, acute kidney disease (AKD) is associated with a higher risk of chronic kidney disease (CKD) and mortality. From January 2018 to December 2021, 158 patients undergoing CRS-HIPEC were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were separated into non-AKI, AKI, and AKD cohorts. Laboratory parameters and perioperative features were gathered to evaluate risk factors for both HIPEC-induced AKI and AKD, with the 90-day prognosis of AKD patients. AKI developed in 21.5% of patients undergoing CRS-HIPEC, while 13.3% progressed to AKD. The multivariate analysis identified that ascites, GRAN%, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), and intraoperative (IO) hypotension duration were associated with the development of HIPEC-induced AKI. Higher uric acid, lessened eGFR, and prolonged IO hypotension duration were more predominant in patients proceeding with AKD. The AKD cohort presented a higher risk of 30 days of in-hospital mortality (14.3%) and CKD progression (42.8%). Our study reveals a high incidence of AKI and AKI-to-AKD transition. Early identification of risk factors for HIPEC-induced AKD would assist clinicians in taking measures to mitigate the incidence. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Low-grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasm (LAMN) is a tumor that primarily originates from the appendix and belongs to the family of appendiceal mucinous neoplasms (AMNs). In 50% of female patients, AMNs (particularly LAMNs) have a tendency to metastasize to organs in the genital tract, where the neoplasm can mimic the features of primary ovarian mucinous cancer (POMC). The present case report reviewed the difficulties in differentiating between these two types of tumors. In the present case report, a 61-year-old female patient was admitted to the Second Department of Gynecological Surgery and Gynecological Oncology, University Clinical Hospital no. 4 at Lublin Medical University (Lublin, Poland) with the diagnosis of a right ovarian mass. After performing ultrasound and computed tomography (CT) scans and laboratory analysis, the patient underwent total abdominal hysterectomy, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, omentectomy, appendectomy and resection of the Douglas peritoneum. Notably, the postoperative pathological assessment revealed LAMN with metastases to the right ovary and omentum. Immunohistochemically, cytokeratin 20 and caudal type homeobox 2 both stained positively, whereas paired box gene 8 stained negatively. After surgery, the patient received the recommended hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy at the Department of Surgical Oncology at Lublin Medical University. After 1 year, a CT scan was performed, which indicated no evidence of recurrent disease. In conclusion, observations from the present case report suggest that gynecologists should be conscious of the possibility of malignancies of gastrointestinal origin in cases of ovarian tumors instead of making direct assumptions of POMC. If the mucinous mass involves the base of the appendix or if there is a suspicion of positive margins, then cytoreductive surgery and right-sided hemicolectomy must be performed. In addition, identifying the origin of mucinous tumors in the right ovary and/or the appendix requires the histopathological examination of a panel of markers using immunohistochemistry. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To study outcomes after cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS-HIPEC) in patients also treated for colorectal liver metastases (CLM). Background: Colorectal cancer (CRC) frequently metastasizes to the liver and peritoneum and is associated with a poor prognosis. In selected patients, a benefit in overall survival (OS) was shown for both peritoneal metastases (PM-CRC) offered CRS-HIPEC, and CLM treated with surgical resection. However, the presence of CLM was considered a relative contraindication to CRS-HIPEC, causing a paucity of outcome data in this patient group. Methods: Patients with PM-CRC having CRS-HIPEC at a single national center between 2007 and 2023, with additional intervention for CLM, were included (previous curative treatment for extraperitoneal and extrahepatic metastases was allowed). Three groups were defined: CLM before CRS-HIPEC (pre-CRS-HIPEC), CLM resected simultaneously with CRS-HIPEC (sim-CRS-HIPEC), and CLM after CRS-HIPEC (post-CRS-HIPEC), aiming to retrospectively analyze outcomes. Results: Fifty-seven patients were included and classified as: pre-CRS-HIPEC (n = 11), sim-CRS-HIPEC (n = 29), and post-CRS-HIPEC (n = 17). Median Peritoneal Cancer Index (PCI) was 8; 13 patients had severe complications (Clavien-Dindo ≥ 3), and no 90-day mortality. Median OS was 48 months after CRS-HIPEC. PCI was a predictor of OS (hazard ratio: 1.11, P < 0.001). We observed no difference in short or long-term outcomes between intervention groups. Discussion: This study demonstrated that patients with CLM having CRS-HIPEC had comparable OS to reports on CRS-HIPEC only, likely explained by a low PCI. Simultaneous CLM resection did not increase the risk of severe complications. Conclusions: In this national cohort, CRS-HIPEC and CLM intervention offers long-term survival, suggesting that this treatment may be offered to selected patients with PM-CRC and CLM. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Decision regret is an emerging patient reported outcome. The aim of this study was to assess the incidence of regret in patients with appendiceal cancer (AC) who underwent cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS-HIPEC). Patients and Methods: An anonymous survey was distributed to patients through the Appendix Cancer and Pseudomyxoma Peritonei (ACPMP) Research Foundation. The Decision Regret Scale (DRS) was employed, with DRS > 25 signifying regret. Patient demographics, tumor characteristics, postoperative outcomes, symptoms (FACT-C), and PROMIS-29 quality of life (QoL) scores were compared between patients who regretted or did not regret (NO-REG) the procedure. Results: A total of 122 patients were analyzed. The vast majority had no regret about undergoing CRS-HIPEC (85.2%); 18 patients expressed regret (14.8%). Patients with higher regret had: income ≤ $74,062 (72.2% vs 44.2% NO-REG; p = 0.028), major complications within 30 days of surgery (55.6% vs 15.4% NO-REG; p < 0.001), > 30 days hospital stay (38.9% vs 4.8% NO-REG; p < 0.001), a new ostomy (27.8% vs 7.7% NO-REG; p = 0.03), >1 CRS-HIPEC procedure (56.3% vs 12.6% NO-REG; p < 0.001). Patients with worse FACT-C scores had more regret (p < 0.001). PROMIS-29 QOL scores were universally worse in patients with regret. Multivariable analysis demonstrated > 30 days in the hospital, new ostomy and worse gastrointestinal symptom scores were significantly associated with regret. Conclusions: The majority of patients with AC undergoing CRS-HIPEC do not regret undergoing the procedure. Lower income, postoperative complications, an ostomy, undergoing > 1 procedure, and with worse long-term gastrointestinal symptoms were associated with increased regret. Targeted perioperative psychological support and symptom management may assist to ameliorate regret. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Sarcoma is a rare mesenchymal tumor. Evaluation of sarcoma patients primarily or after recurrence must be done in an experienced center. En bloc surgical resection is the mainstay of treatment for all sarcoma subtypes. The primary surgery or re-resection after recurrence must be done by an experienced, well-trained surgeon. Correlation between the imaging findings, the operative, and the histopathological findings is a must. We report a patient who was diagnosed with retroperitoneal sarcoma and had three surgical resections with incomplete removal. The last resection was complicated by a urinary leak. The tumor was resected piecemeal with the use of gemcitabine and docetaxel as a novel combination for hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy in recurrent complicated abdominal sarcomas.

Abstract Background Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) combined with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is established in the management of pseudomyxoma peritonei (PMP), selected cases of peritoneal mesothelioma, and resectable colorectal or ovarian peritoneal metastases in Western countries. However, the efficacy and feasibility of these techniques are not well established in the Asian population, and little has been reported on long‐term survival outcomes for surgically resected PMP patients. Materials and Methods Retrospective analysis of a prospective database of short‐ and longer‐term outcomes of consecutive patients who underwent CRS and HIPEC for PMP in a newly established peritoneal malignancy unit in Japan between 2010 and 2016. Results A total of 105 patients underwent CRS and HIPEC and 57 maximal tumor debulking (MTD) for pseudomyxoma peritonei. In the CRS group, the primary tumor was appendiceal in 94 patients (90%) followed by ovarian and colorectal. Major postoperative complications occurred in 22/105 patients (21%) with one in‐hospital mortality (0.9%). The 5‐year overall and disease‐free survival rates for the CRS group were 74.2% and 50.1%, respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed unfavorable histology to be the significant predictor of reduced overall and disease‐free survival. Completeness of cytoreduction, CA19‐9, and CA125 were also associated with disease‐free survival. Conclusions This is the first report on long‐term outcomes and survival analysis of CRS and HIPEC for PMP in the Asian population. CRS and HIPEC can be conducted with reasonable safety and favorable survival in a new center. Complete tumor removal and histological type are the strongest prognostic factors for both overall and disease‐free survival.

Abstract Introduction The safety and efficacy of CRS + HIPEC combined with urinary tract resection and reconstruction are controversial. This study aims to summarize the clinicopathological features and to evaluate the safety and survival prognosis of CRS + HIPEC combined with urinary tract resection and reconstruction. Methods The patients who underwent urinary tract resection and reconstruction as part of CRS surgery were retrospectively selected from our disease-specific database for analysis. The clinicopathological characteristics, treatment-related variables, perioperative adverse events (AEs), and survival outcomes were studied using a descriptive approach and the K-M analysis with log-rank comparison. Results Forty-nine patients were enrolled. Perioperative serious AEs (SAEs) were observed in 11 patients (22.4%), with urinary SAEs occurring in 3 patients (6.1%). Additionally, there were 23 cases (46.8%) involving urinary adverse events (UAEs). The median overall survival (OS) in the entire cohort was 59.2 (95%CI: 42.1–76.4) months. The median OS of the UAE group and No-UAE group were 59.2 months (95%CI not reached), and 50.5 (95%CI: 11.5 to 89.6) months, respectively, with no significant difference (P = 0.475). Furthermore, there were no significant differences in OS based on the grade of UAEs or the number of UAEs (P = 0.562 and P = 0.622, respectively). Conclusion The combination of CRS + HIPEC with urinary tract resection and reconstruction is associated with a high incidence of Grade I-II UAEs, which do not have an impact on OS. The safety profile of this combined technique is acceptable. However, this is a retrospective single-center single-arm analysis, with limitations of generalizability and potential selection bias. The findings need high-level validation.

Gastric cancer (GC) is the fifth most diagnosed cancer, but it is the third leading cause of cancer death worldwide. Despite the likelihood of gastric cancer metastasizing to the peritoneum, optimal management strategies for this population remain undefined. We carried out a retrospective analysis to present our findings on patients with advanced gastric cancer (AGC) with peritoneal metastases (CP) who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by gastrectomy + hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). To better understand the data, we compared these patients with AGC patients without CP who were treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy and surgery, as well as with another group of patients who underwent upfront surgery. Patients who undergo surgery and HIPEC achieve a higher survival rate than patients in the literature who undergo only palliative chemotherapy with a median overall survival of 28 months with a low incidence of major complications.

Lei Wang,1 Xinbao Li,2 Yan Li,2 Zhongying Bao,1 Shuhong Duan,1 Jie Zhang1 1Department of Infectious Diseases, Beijing Shijitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100038, People’s Republic of China; 2Department of Peritoneal Cancer Surgery, Beijing Shijitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100038, People’s Republic of ChinaCorrespondence: Lei Wang, Department of Infectious Diseases, Beijing Shijitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, NO. 10, Tie Yi Road, Yang Fang Dian, Haidian District, Beijing, 100038, People’s Republic of China, Tel + 86 10 63926121, Email wanglei2489@bjsjth.cnObjective: In this study we aimed to evaluate the postoperative safety of cytoreductive surgery (CRS) combined with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) for the treatment of peritoneal surface malignancies (PSM), and analyzed the risk factors and pathogen resistance associated with bloodstream infections.Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the incidence of postoperative bloodstream infections in 1500 patients undergoing CRS and HIPEC for PSM. We utilized univariate and multivariate analyses to screen for independent risk factors associated with postoperative bloodstream infections in CRS combined with HIPEC.Results: Among the 1500 cases of individuals undergoing CRS combined with HIPEC, 207 cases (13.8%) experienced bloodstream infections. A total of 233 strains of pathogens were isolated and cultured, consisting of 151 gram-positive cocci, 52 gram-negative bacilli, and 30 fungi. Coagulase-negative staphylococci (SCN) were the gram-positive cocci (54.94%), while Klebsiella pneumoniae subsp. Pneumoniae (7.30%) and Escherichia coli (5.58%) dominated the Gram-negative bacilli. Candida albicans was the predominant fungus. Staphylococci exhibited high sensitivity to tigecycline, linezolid, vancomycin, and quinupristin/dalfopristin. However, K. pneumoniae and E. coli were resistant to imipenem. Furthermore, five parameters were associated with the development of bloodstream infections: age (P = 0.040), surgical history (P = 0.033), prior tumor treatment (P < 0.001), tumor tissue type (P = 0.034), and completeness of cytoreduction (CC) score (P = 0.004). Among these, age (P = 0.013), prior tumor treatment (P = 0.001), tumor tissue type (P = 0.032), and CC score (P = 0.002) emerged as independent risk factors for postoperative bloodstream infections in patients undergoing CRS combined with HIPEC.Conclusion: Postoperative bloodstream infections in patients with PSM undergoing CRS combined with HIPEC are predominantly attributed to SCN, K. pneumoniae subsp. Pneumoniae, and C. albicans. Notably, Enterobacteriaceae exhibited resistance to carbapenem. Independent risk factors for postoperative infections in PSM include age, prior tumor treatment, tumor tissue type, and completeness of cytoreduction score.Keywords: bloodstream infections, cytoreductive surgery, hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy, pathogens drug resistance, pathogens

Background. The high prevalence of advanced forms of cancer currently requires new treatment approaches. Only modern high-tech surgical procedures can provide means for improving the results of treatment.The aim. To study the results of treatment of patients with ovarian cancer with symptoms of peritoneal carcinomatosis using the HIPEC (Hyperthermic IntraPEritoneal Chemotherapy) method.Materials and methods. The study was conducted in Irkutsk Regional Cancer Center and included 88 patients. They were divided into 2 groups: group 1 – primary cytoreductive surgery (CRS) with the HIPEC method (41 patients); group 2 – primary cytoreductive surgery (47 patients). The most important criterion was the peritoneal cancer index (PCI). If the PCI was ≤ 14, we chose cytoreductive surgery with or without HIPEC.Results. PCI analysis showed differences in its values between the study groups (CRS – 10.17 ± 0.952; CRS + HIPEC – 12.93 ± 0.744; p = 0.002). There was an increase in length of stay in patients who underwent major surgeries in combination with HIPEC (21.8 ± 0.9 days versus 14.5 ± 0.6 days in the CRS group; p = 0.001). The CRS + HIPEC group had a longer duration of surgery (394.88 ± 19.935 min vs. 172.98 ± 11.514 min in the CRS group; p = 0.001). There was an increase in the overall percentage of postoperative complications in the CRS + HIPEC group – up to 26.8 % without statistically significant differences with the CRS group – 8.5 % (p = 0.082). The median time of relapse onset in the CRS + HIPEC group was 26 ± 4.3 months, while in the CRS group it was 18 ± 2.6 months.Conclusion. Using HIPEC method has proven its significance in increasing diseasefree survival.

Abstract Background Hepatocellular carcinoma with peritoneal metastasis (HCC-PM) has a poor outlook. Traditional treatments have limited effect on survival. The safety and efficacy of cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS + HIPEC) have been shown in other peritoneal cancers. This study evaluates the role of CRS + HIPEC in HCC-PM. Methods A retrospective analysis of HCC-PM patients treated with CRS + HIPEC at Beijing Shijitan Hospital from March 2017 to December 2023 was conducted, assessing clinical features, severe adverse events (SAEs), and overall survival (OS) rates. Results The study population comprised 10 HCC-PM patients who underwent CRS + HIPEC. The median peritoneal cancer index (PCI) was 25, and complete cytoreduction (CC0 ~ 1) was achieved in half of the patients. Three patients experienced SAEs within 30 days postoperatively. The 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year OS rates were recorded as 89.0%, 89.0%, and 21.0% respectively, with a median OS1 of 107.8 months and OS2 of 49.9 months. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 5.0 months. Conclusion The application of CRS + HIPEC offers significant benefits to patients with HCC-PM. A selected group of patients may achieve prolonged PFS. Incorporating CRS + HIPEC into the treatment paradigm can thus be considered a strategic therapeutic option for patients with HCC-PM.

This article discusses a study that examined the effectiveness and safety of combining whole-body infrared hyperthermia with immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy for advanced gastrointestinal tumors. The study included 18 patients with different types of gastrointestinal cancer and found that the treatment provided survival benefits and was safe and feasible. The results showed a disease control rate of 55.6% and a median progression-free survival of 53.5 days. The study suggests that this combination therapy could improve outcomes for patients with advanced gastrointestinal tumors. However, further research on a larger scale is needed to confirm these findings. [Extracted from the article]

Background: The newest clinical evidence that the relationship between the peritoneal cancer index (PCI) and the postoperative prognosis of advanced ovarian cancer patients remains controversial, and there are no large-sample and multicenter studies to clarify this matter. Therefore, in this paper, we used meta-analysis to systematically assess the postoperative prognostic value of PCI in subjects with advanced ovarian cancer to provide individualized treatment plans and thus improve the prognosis of patients. Methods: Literature on the correlation between PCI and the postoperative prognosis in subjects with advanced OC undergoing cytoreductive surgery (CRS) was searched in the Cochrane Library, Pubmed, Embase, and Web of Science from the database inception to April 20, 2023. The search was updated on February 28, 2024. We only included late-stage (FIGO stage: III-IV) patients who did not undergo neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) or hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). Afterwards, literature screening and data extraction were conducted using Endnote20 software. The literature quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS). Lastly, statistical analysis was performed with STATA 15.0 software. Results: Five studies with 774 patients were included. The result indicated that patients with high PCI had a worse prognosis than those with low PCI. The combined hazard ratio was 2.79 [95%CI: (2.04, 3.82), p<0.001] for overall survival (OS) in patients with high PCI. Further subgroup analysis by the FIGO staging revealed that in stage III [HR: 2.61, 95%CI: (2.00, 3.40), p<0.001] and stage III-IV patients [HR: 2.69, 95%CI: (1.66, 4.36), p<0.001], a high PCI score was significantly associated with a worse prognosis. The PCI score had a greater impact on the OS of patients with higher stages. The combined hazard ratio was 1.89 [95%CI: (1.51, 2.36), p<0.001] for progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with high PCI. Conclusion: PCI may be used as a postoperative prognosis indicator in patients with advanced OC on primary debulking surgery. High PCI indicates a worse prognosis. However, further research is warranted to confirm these findings. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: This study evaluates the potential superiority of combining paclitaxel-based hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) with sequential intravenous neoadjuvant chemotherapy over intravenous neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone in Chinese patients with Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage IIIC, IVA and IVB high-grade serous ovarian/fallopian tube carcinoma (HGSOC). This interim analysis focuses on the safety and immediate efficacy of both regimens to determine the feasibility of the planned trial (C-HOC Trial). Methods: In a single-center, open-label, randomized control trial, FIGO stage IIIC, IVA, and IVB HGSOC patients (FAGOTTI score ≥ 8 during laparoscopic exploration) unsuitable for optimal cytoreduction in primary debulking surgery (PDS) were randomized 2:1 during laparoscopic exploration. The Experiment Group (HIPEC Group) received one cycle of intraperitoneal neoadjuvant laparoscopic hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (paclitaxel) followed by three cycles of intravenous chemotherapy (paclitaxel plus carboplatin), while the Control Group received only three cycles of intravenous chemotherapy. Both groups subsequently underwent interval debulking surgery (IDS). The adverse effects of chemotherapy, postoperative complications, and pathological chemotherapy response scores (CRS) after IDS were compared. Results: Among 65 enrolled patients, 39 HIPEC Group and 21 Control Group patients underwent IDS. Grade 3–4 chemotherapy-related adverse effects were primarily hematological with no significant differences between the two groups. The HIPEC Group exhibited a higher proportion of CRS 3 (20.5% vs. 4.8%; P = 0.000). R0 resection rates in IDS were 69.2% (HIPEC Group) and 66.7% (Control Group). R2 resection occurred in 2.6% (HIPEC Group) and 14.3% (Control Group) cases. No reoperations or postoperative deaths were reported, and complications were managed conservatively. Conclusions: Combining HIPEC with IV NACT in treating ovarian cancer demonstrated safety and feasibility, with no increased chemotherapy-related adverse effects or postoperative complications. HIPEC improved tumor response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy, potentially enhancing progression-free survival (PFS). However, the final overall survival results are pending, determining if HIPEC combined with IV NACT is superior to IV NACT alone. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is traditionally a maximally invasive operation with a large abdominal incision and multi‐visceral resections. However, to minimize abdominal wall morbidity and improve functional recovery, some centres have adopted a minimally invasive (MI) approach in select cases. The primary aim of this systematic review and meta‐analysis was to assess the evidence for safety and patient selection for minimally invasive approaches to CRS and HIPEC with curative intent. Methods: A PRISMA‐compliant systematic review was performed using three electronic databases: Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE and Web of Science. Data regarding postoperative morbidity was meta‐analysed. Results: Thirteen studies met the inclusion criteria (N = 462 MI patients), all of which were retrospective in design. Six studies included an open comparison group. Pseudomyxoma peritonei, mesothelioma and ovarian carcinoma made up the majority of cases (>90%), with a PCI < 10 listed as a prerequisite to selection across all studies. On pooled analysis there was no difference in major morbidity between MI and open groups (OR 0.52 95% CI 0.18–1.46, P = 0.33). There was one perioperative death reported in the MI group. Length of stay appeared shorter in the MI group (median range MI: 4–11 v Open: 7–13 days). Short‐term recurrence and overall survival between both groups also appeared no different. Conclusion: Minimally invasive CRS and HIPEC appears feasible and safe in appropriately selected patients. Clear histological stratification and longer term follow up is required to determine oncological safety, particularly in more aggressive tumours such as colorectal peritoneal metastases. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and Aims: Ovarian cancer maintains the highest mortality rate among gynecological malignancies. Unfortunately, two-thirds of cases are diagnosed at an advanced stage with the presence of peritoneal carcinomatosis. In this study, we aimed to present the 7-year results of cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy in cases where peritoneal carcinomatosis developed during the medical oncological treatment and follow-up after primary high-grade serous ovarian cancer debulking surgeries. Patients and Methods: Data from 63 patients collected prospectively in our clinic were retrospectively evaluated. Results: Postoperative Clavien–Dindo grade 3–4 complications occurred in 12 cases (19%) and 14 cases (22.2%), respectively. CD grade 3a complications developed in four cases (6.3%), which were treated with percutaneous drainage catheters, while CD grade 3b complications occurred in eight cases (12.7%), and these cases underwent reoperation. Five cases (7.9%) experienced mortality within the first 30 days. The mean survival time was determined as 44.99 months (36.33–53.65), while the median survival time was 56 months. Conclusions: In selected patients requiring redo surgery due to recurrent ovarian cancer, secondary cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy are associated with longer overall survival and should be considered in the treatment of advanced-stage disease. Further large-scale randomized controlled trials are needed in this regard. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) combined with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is a major treatment of colorectal peritoneal carcinomatosis (CPC). The aim was to determine the disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) of patients undergoing CRS–HIPEC for CPC and factors associated with long-term survival (LTS). Methods: consecutive CPC patients who underwent CRS–HIPEC at a HIPEC center between 2007 and 2021 were included. Actual survival was calculated, and Cox proportional hazards models were used to identify factors associated with OS, DFS and LTS. Results: there were 125 patients with CPC who underwent primary CRS–HIPEC, with mean age of 54.5 years. Median follow-up was 31 months. Average intraoperative PCI was 11, and complete cytoreduction (CC-0) was achieved in 96.8%. Median OS was 41.6 months (6–196). The 2-year and 5-year OS were 68% and 24.8%, respectively, and the 2-year DFS was 28.8%. Factors associated with worse OS included pre-HIPEC systemic therapy, synchronous extraperitoneal metastasis, and PCI ≥ 20 (p < 0.05). Progression prior to CRS–HIPEC was associated with worse DFS (p < 0.05). Lower PCI, fewer complications, lower recurrence and longer DFS were associated with LTS (p < 0.05). Conclusion: CRS and HIPEC improve OS in CPC patients but they have high disease recurrence. Outcomes depend on preoperative therapy response, extraperitoneal metastasis, and peritoneal disease burden. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Pseudomyxoma peritonei (PMP) is an indolent malignant syndrome. The standard treatment for PMP is cytoreductive surgery combined with intraperitoneal hyperthermic chemotherapy (CRS + HIPEC). However, the high recurrence rate and latent clinical symptoms and signs are major obstacles to further improving clinical outcomes. Moreover, patients in advanced stages receive little benefit from CRS + HIPEC due to widespread intraperitoneal metastases. Another challenge in PMP treatment involves the progressive sclerosis of PMP cell-secreted mucus, which is often increased due to activating mutations in the gene coding for guanine nucleotide-binding protein alpha subunit (GNAS). Consequently, the development of other PMP therapies is urgently needed. Several immune-related therapies have shown promise, including the use of bacterium-derived non-specific immunogenic agents, radioimmunotherapeutic agents, and tumor cell-derived neoantigens, but a well-recognized immunotherapy has not been established. In this review the roles of GNAS mutations in the promotion of mucin secretion and disease development are discussed. In addition, the immunologic features of the PMP microenvironment and immune-associated treatments are discussed to summarize the current understanding of key features of the disease and to facilitate the development of immunotherapies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: The TORPEDO (CTRI/2018/12/016789) is the single-arm, prospective, interventional study evaluating the role of a total parietal peritonectomy (TPP) in patients undergoing interval cytoreductive surgery (iCRS). In this manuscript, we report the perioperative outcomes and platinum resistant recurrence (PRR) in 218 patients enrolled in the study. Methods: A TPP was performed in all patients undergoing iCRS irrespective of the residual disease extent. hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) was performed as per the clinician's discretion with 75 mg/m2 of cisplatin. Maintenance therapy was also used at the discretion of the treating clinicians. Results: From 9th December 2018 to 31st July 2022 (recruitment complete), 218 patients were enrolled at 4 medical centers in India. The median surgical peritoneal cancer index was 14 and a complete gross resection was achieved in 95.8%. HIPEC was performed in 130 (59.6%) patients. The 90-day major morbidity was 17.4% and 2.7% patients died within 90 days of surgery. Adjuvant chemotherapy was delayed beyond 6 weeks in 7.3%. At a median follow-up of 19 months (95% confidence interval [CI]=15.9-35 months), 101 (46.3%) recurrences and 19 (8.7%) deaths had occurred. The median progression-free survival was 22 months (95% CI=17-35 months) and the median overall survival (OS) not reached. Platinum resistant recurrence was observed in 6.4%. The projected 3-year OS was 81.5% and in 80 patients treated before may 2020, it was 77.5%. Conclusion: The morbidity and mortality of TPP with or without HIPEC performed during iCRS is acceptable. The incidence was of PRR is low. Early survival results are encouraging and warrant conduction of a randomized controlled trial comparing TPP with conventional surgery. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: This study aimed to assess the prognostic role of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) in patients with epithelial appendiceal neoplasms with peritoneal metastases. The presence of CTCs may be used for the early detection of invasive cancer in this rare diagnosis. Our study is the first study to assess the potential value of CTCs in this specific group of patients. Appendiceal tumors are uncommon and, at times, discovered incidentally during histological examination. The histopathological classification of the disease is complex and has generated some controversy. The analysis of circulating tumor cells can be used for the early detection of metastatic potential. The aim of the present study was to examine the prognostic value of circulating tumor cells in patients with appendiceal tumors and peritoneal metastases. To our knowledge, this is the first study to examine CTCs in appendiceal tumors. We performed a prospective cohort study of consecutive patients treated with cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy between 2015 and 2019 at a HIPEC referral center. In total, 31 patients were included in the analysis, and circulating tumor cells were detected in 15 patients (48%). CTC positivity was not associated with overall or recurrence-free survival, nor was it correlated with PCI score or histopathological grading. Surprisingly, however, CTCs were found in almost half the patients. The presence or quantities of these cells did not, on their own, predict systemic metastatic potential during the observed time, and they did not appear to significantly correlate with the oncological outcomes recorded. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Although several studies have been completed to investigate the effect of cytoreductive surgery (CRS) with or without hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) in endometrial cancer with peritoneal metastasis (ECPM), a direct comparison was not performed previously. A meta-analysis was performed to investigate the suspected additional survival benefits of CRS plus HIPEC over CRS only. Twenty-one and ten studies with a total number of 1116 and 152 cases investigating CRS only and CRS plus HIPEC were identified, respectively. When all articles were analyzed, the 1-year survival rate was 17.60% higher for CRS plus HIPEC (82.28% vs. 64.68%; p = 0.0102). The same tendency was observed for the 2-year (56.07% vs. 36.95%; difference: 19.12%; p = 0.0014), but not for the 5-year (21.88% vs. 16.45%; difference: 5.43%; p = 0.3918) survival rates. The same clinical significance, but statistically less strong observations, could be made if only the studies published after 2010 were investigated (1-year survival rate: 12.08% and p = 0.0648; 2-year survival rate: 10.90% and p = 0.0988). CRS remains one of the core elements of ECPM treatment, but the addition of HIPEC to CRS can increase the positive clinical outcome, especially in the first 2 years. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Multimodal treatment in peritoneal metastases (PM) from colorectal neoplasms may improve overall survival (OS). In this study, we reported our experience in using cytoreductive surgery (CRS) combined with intraperitoneal chemohyperthermia (HIPEC) for the treatment of peritoneal metastases (PM) from colorectal neoplasms. The first aim was to evaluate the overall survival of these patients. Furthermore, using the results of the Prodige 7 Trial and incorporating them with the entropy balance statistical tool, we generated a pseudopopulation on which to test the use of CRS alone. We performed a retrospective analysis based on a prospective database of all 55 patients treated with CRS + HIPEC between March 2004 and January 2023. The median OS was 47 months, with 1-, 3- and 5-year survival rates of 90.8%, 58.7% and 42.7%, respectively. There was no significant difference in the data in the pseudogroup generated with entropy balance. This finding confirms the critical role of complete cytoreduction in achieving the best OS for patients with PM. PCI > 6 seems to be the most important prognostic factor influencing OS. At present, CRS + HIPEC seems to be the therapeutic strategy that guarantees the best results in terms of OS for patients with relatively low PCI and in whom a CCS ≤ 1 can be achieved. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) combined with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is established in the management of pseudomyxoma peritonei (PMP), selected cases of peritoneal mesothelioma, and resectable colorectal or ovarian peritoneal metastases in Western countries. However, the efficacy and feasibility of these techniques are not well established in the Asian population, and little has been reported on long‐term survival outcomes for surgically resected PMP patients. Materials and Methods: Retrospective analysis of a prospective database of short‐ and longer‐term outcomes of consecutive patients who underwent CRS and HIPEC for PMP in a newly established peritoneal malignancy unit in Japan between 2010 and 2016. Results: A total of 105 patients underwent CRS and HIPEC and 57 maximal tumor debulking (MTD) for pseudomyxoma peritonei. In the CRS group, the primary tumor was appendiceal in 94 patients (90%) followed by ovarian and colorectal. Major postoperative complications occurred in 22/105 patients (21%) with one in‐hospital mortality (0.9%). The 5‐year overall and disease‐free survival rates for the CRS group were 74.2% and 50.1%, respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed unfavorable histology to be the significant predictor of reduced overall and disease‐free survival. Completeness of cytoreduction, CA19‐9, and CA125 were also associated with disease‐free survival. Conclusions: This is the first report on long‐term outcomes and survival analysis of CRS and HIPEC for PMP in the Asian population. CRS and HIPEC can be conducted with reasonable safety and favorable survival in a new center. Complete tumor removal and histological type are the strongest prognostic factors for both overall and disease‐free survival. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]