1. Does HPV‐18 co‐infection increase the risk of cervical pathology in individuals with HPV‐16?
- Author
-
Gökkaya, Mustafa, Alcı, Aysun, Aytekin, Okan, Unsal, Mehmet, Cakır, Caner, Oktar, Okan, Yalcin, Necim, Kahraman, Alper, Tokalioglu, Alp, Ersak, Burak, Yıldırım, Hande Esra Koca, Koc, Sevgi, Toptas, Tayfun, Kilic, Fatih, Celik, Fatih, Boran, Nurettin, Ustun, Yaprak, Tekin, Ozlem Moraloglu, Comert, Gunsu Kimyon, and Korkmaz, Vakkas
- Subjects
- *
CERVICAL intraepithelial neoplasia , *GYNECOLOGIC cancer , *CANCER invasiveness , *HUMAN papillomavirus , *COLPOSCOPY - Abstract
Objective: We aimed to investigate differences between HPV‐16 mono‐ and HPV‐16/18 co‐infections in terms of cervical dysplasia and invasive cancer. Methods: This multicentre, retrospective study spanned from December 2017 to December 2020, involving women who visited gynaecological oncology clinics for colposcopy with either HPV‐16 or HPV‐16/18 positivity. A total of 736 patients, 670 in Group 1 (HPV‐16 positivity) and 66 in Group 2 (HPV‐16/18 positivity), were compared for the presence of CIN2+ lesions detected by colposcopic biopsy or endocervical curettage (ECC). Exclusions included hysterectomized patients, those with prior gynaecological cancers, and patients with HPV positivity other than types 16 and 18. Results: Among the included patients, 42.4% had a diagnosis of CIN2+ lesions. The cytology results demonstrated abnormal findings in 45.3% in Group 1 and 42.2% in Group 2, with no significant difference between the groups. ECC revealed CIN2+ lesion in 49 (8.7%) patients in group 1, while only 1 (1.7%) patient had CIN2+ lesion in group 2. There was no difference between 2 groups in terms of ECC result (p = 0.052). In group 1, 289 (43.1%) patients had CIN2+ lesion, while 23 (34.8%) patients had CIN2+ lesions in group 2. There was no difference between group 1 and 2 in terms of diagnosis of CIN2+ lesions (p = 0.19). Conclusion: This multicentre retrospective study found no significant differences between HPV‐16 mono‐ and HPV‐16/18 co‐infections regarding cervical pathologies. Larger studies are needed to validate and further explore these findings. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF