Search

High-dose melphalan (HDM) plus autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) remains a standard-of-care treatment approach for eligible patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) based on demonstrated superiority in terms of progression-free survival (PFS) versus nontransplant approaches. Very high rates of minimal residual disease (MRD)-negative responses are also being seen with novel triplet and quadruplet induction regimens plus HDM-ASCT. However, recent clinical trials have shown no overall survival benefit with transplant versus nontransplant approaches. Furthermore, HDM is associated with several important downsides, including acute and long-term toxicities, transient decreases in quality of life, the need for hospitalization, an increased mutational burden at relapse, and an elevated risk of second primary malignancies. In this context, given the highly heterogeneous nature of MM in the NDMM patient population, as well as the continued emergence of novel agents and treatment approaches, there is an increasing rationale for considering deferred HDM-ASCT approaches in selected patients. Approaches under investigation include MRD-adapted therapy and the use of novel immune-based therapies as alternatives to HDM-ASCT. Ongoing developments in understanding the pathobiology and prognostic factors in NDMM, plus immune profiling and routine MRD evaluation, will result in novel, HDM-sparing treatment paradigms, enabling further improvement in patient outcomes.

High-dose melphalan (HDM) plus autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) remains a standard-of-care treatment approach for eligible patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) based on demonstrated superiority in terms of progression-free survival (PFS) versus nontransplant approaches. Very high rates of minimal residual disease (MRD)-negative responses are also being seen with novel triplet and quadruplet induction regimens plus HDM-ASCT. However, recent clinical trials have shown no overall survival benefit with transplant versus nontransplant approaches. Furthermore, HDM is associated with several important downsides, including acute and long-term toxicities, transient decreases in quality of life, the need for hospitalization, an increased mutational burden at relapse, and an elevated risk of second primary malignancies. In this context, given the highly heterogeneous nature of MM in the NDMM patient population, as well as the continued emergence of novel agents and treatment approaches, there is an increasing rationale for considering deferred HDM-ASCT approaches in selected patients. Approaches under investigation include MRD-adapted therapy and the use of novel immune-based therapies as alternatives to HDM-ASCT. Ongoing developments in understanding the pathobiology and prognostic factors in NDMM, plus immune profiling and routine MRD evaluation, will result in novel, HDM-sparing treatment paradigms, enabling further improvement in patient outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Patients who are diagnosed with multiple myeloma are given an initial sequence of treatments that usually, for those who are young and fit enough, includes high-dose melphalan followed by autologous stem cell transplantation. This has contributed to the improvement in survival seen over the past 30 years. However, high-dose melphalan has significant limitations, including short-term side effects and longer-term issues such as an increased risk of developing secondary hematologic malignancies including leukemia. There are now numerous highly efficacious combination regimens for initial treatment that result in increasingly large proportions of patients achieving deep responses with no evidence of minimal residual disease. Moreover, large, randomized studies using these regimens have shown no benefit in overall survival after receiving high-dose melphalan with stem cell transplantation. There is thus a growing rationale for selected eligible patients to defer receiving high-dose melphalan and stem cell transplantation until potentially needed in a subsequent line of treatment. The standards of care for the initial treatment of patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) who are eligible for high-dose melphalan and autologous stem cell transplantation (HDM-ASCT) include highly active triplet and quadruplet regimens based on proteasome inhibitors, immunomodulatory drugs, and monoclonal antibodies. These regimens are resulting in improved outcomes and increasingly high rates of minimal residual disease (MRD)-negative responses without HDM-ASCT as part of the upfront therapy. Furthermore, recent randomized studies have shown that, while transplant-based approaches as a frontline therapy result in significantly longer progression-free survival compared to non-transplant approaches, this has not translated into an overall survival benefit. Given these developments, and in the context of the treatment burden of undergoing HDM-ASCT, in addition to the acute toxicities and long-term sequelae of HDM, which are associated with the genotoxicity of melphalan, there is an increasing rationale for considering deferring upfront HDM-ASCT in select transplant-eligible patients and saving it as a treatment option for later salvage therapy. Here, we review the latest clinical trial data on upfront or deferred HDM-ASCT and on the activity of quadruplet induction regimens, including rates of MRD-negative responses, and summarize emerging treatment approaches in the upfront setting such as the use of MRD-directed therapy and alternatives to HDM-ASCT. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The standards of care for the initial treatment of patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) who are eligible for high-dose melphalan and autologous stem cell transplantation (HDM-ASCT) include highly active triplet and quadruplet regimens based on proteasome inhibitors, immunomodulatory drugs, and monoclonal antibodies. These regimens are resulting in improved outcomes and increasingly high rates of minimal residual disease (MRD)-negative responses without HDM-ASCT as part of the upfront therapy. Furthermore, recent randomized studies have shown that, while transplant-based approaches as a frontline therapy result in significantly longer progression-free survival compared to non-transplant approaches, this has not translated into an overall survival benefit. Given these developments, and in the context of the treatment burden of undergoing HDM-ASCT, in addition to the acute toxicities and long-term sequelae of HDM, which are associated with the genotoxicity of melphalan, there is an increasing rationale for considering deferring upfront HDM-ASCT in select transplant-eligible patients and saving it as a treatment option for later salvage therapy. Here, we review the latest clinical trial data on upfront or deferred HDM-ASCT and on the activity of quadruplet induction regimens, including rates of MRD-negative responses, and summarize emerging treatment approaches in the upfront setting such as the use of MRD-directed therapy and alternatives to HDM-ASCT.

Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) is one of the most frequent adverse events compromising quality of life (QoL) in patients undergoing autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). However, CINV prophylaxis is still lacking uniformity for high-dose melphalan (HDM), which is used to condition patients with multiple myeloma (MM). Netupitant/palonosetron (NEPA) is administered with dexamethasone (DEXA) for CINV prevention in several chemotherapy regimens. Our study aims to assess the efficacy of NEPA, without DEXA, in preventing CINV in 106 adult patients with MM receiving HDM and ASCT. All patients had antiemetic prophylaxis with multiple doses of NEPA 1 h before the start of conditioning and after 72 h and 120 h. A complete response (CR) was observed in 99 (93%) patients at 120 h (overall phase). The percentage of patients with complete control was 93%. The CR rate during the acute phase was 94% (n = 100). During the delayed phase, the CR rate was 95% (n = 101). Grade 1 nausea and vomiting were experienced by 82% and 12% of the patients, respectively. Grade 2 nausea was reported in 18% and vomiting in 10% of patients. Our results showed, for the first time, that NEPA, without DEXA, was a well-tolerated and effective antiemetic option for MM patients receiving HDM followed by ASCT. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Summary: Treatment of patients with light-chain amyloidosis (AL amyloidosis) has changed over the last 20 years, and early mortality rates have decreased with prolongation of survival. However, many patients are not cured with conventional therapy. Therefore, all patients should be assessed at diagnosis to determine eligibility for autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) since high-dose melphalan and ASCT have been shown to induce long-term hematologic and clinical responses with treatment-related mortality (TRM) <5%. Earlier diagnosis, improvement of supportive care, and deeper remissions with recently available first-line therapy have substantially reduced TRM. However, procedures and experience in complex AL amyloidosis patients still vary between transplant centers because a multidisciplinary team is necessary for an individual risk-adapted approach. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Recent advances in multiple myeloma include numerous approvals of novel therapies with unprecedented efficacy, a rapid and sustained tempo of new drug development, and further refinements to prognostication to include minimal residual disease (MRD) testing and improved risk stratification. The upfront use of immunomodulatory drug and proteasome inhibitor combinations followed by maintenance has resulted in transformative clinical benefit. Four‐drug regimens incorporating monoclonal antibodies are reporting unprecedented rates of complete response and MRD negativity in the absence of intensification. In the context of these advances, the added value of high‐dose melphalan with autologous stem‐cell transplant (HDM‐ASCT) is a key question. From a safety standpoint, HDM‐ASCT is associated with both acute toxicities that reduce quality of life and long‐term toxicities that may limit life expectancy for some patients. The present review discusses the recent advances in induction therapy, the impact of these advances on HDM‐ASCT, the evolving role of MRD testing and the short‐ and long‐term risks of HDM‐ASCT. Recognising that prospective data remains limited, we suggest that HDM‐ASCT not be considered mandatory for eligible newly diagnosed patients who are treated with highly efficacious regimens and achieve deep responses, but rather be held in reserve without early exposure to the clinical and genomic toxicity inherent to this approach. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In the past years, high dose chemotherapy (HDT) with autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT)has more extensively been performed in elderly patients with multiple myeloma (MM). Several studies found a similar survival benefit compared to younger patients. The objective of our retrospective study is to analyse the tolerability of HDT + ASCT in elderly patients. We compared 26 ASCT performed in MM patients ≥65 years to 127 ASCT in patients <65 years by evaluating treatment-tolerability, length of hospital stay and number of transfusions. There was no significant difference in the duration of hospitalisation (16 days (range 14–47) in the elderly vs. 17 days (range 14–71) days, P = 0.0903), median time of cytopenia (neutrophils<500/μl: 5 days (range 4–24) vs. 6 days (range 3–28) days, P = 0.1091; platelets<30 000/μl: 6 days (range 3–36) vs. 7 days (range 0–53) days, P = 0.274) or incidence of, or degree of complications between the two age-groups. Immediate and day 100 treatment related mortality (TRM) was comparable in both groups (3.85% vs. 1.58%, P = 0.4304). our findings support the concept that HDT + ASCT can be safely administered as first-line option for well-selected patients≥65 years. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: High-dose melphalan (HDMel) is the most common conditioning chemotherapy regimen for autologous stem cell transplantation (SCT) in patients affected by multiple myeloma (MM). No consensus exists for the emetogenicity or prophylaxis of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) in this regimen.Methods: Data on the incidence and efficacy/safety of CINV prophylaxis among patients affected by MM undergoing autologous SCT with the HDMel regimen was extracted from electronic databases and analyzed.Results: Eleven studies involving multiple CINV prophylaxis regimens were identified and included. No consensus on HDMel emetogenicity was reached, but most studies summarized the emetogenicity as moderate-high risk. An aprepitant-based three-drug regimen (aprepitant + serotonin receptor antagonist (5HT3RA) + dexamethasone) showed better efficacy than a two-drug regimen (5HT3RA + dexamethasone) for CINV prevention without increasing the frequency in adverse events.Conclusions: The aprepitant-based three-drug regimen should be the regimen of choice for CINV prophylaxis for MM patients undergoing autologous SCT with HDMel conditioning. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The most commonly used antibacterial prophylaxis during autologous stem cell transplants (ASCT) for multiple myeloma (MM) involves a fluoroquinolone, such as ciprofloxacin or levofloxacin. We assessed the impact of adding doxycycline to ciprofloxacin as routine antibacterial prophylaxis in these patients.Methods: We retrospectively reviewed electronic medical records and our ASCT database to analyze rates and types of bacterial infections in MM patients who underwent ASCT in our institution.Results: Among 419 patients, 118 received ciprofloxacin alone (cipro group), and 301 ciprofloxacin and doxycycline (cipro-doxy group). Neutropenic fever (NF) developed in 63 (53%) and 108 (36%) patients of the cipro and cipro-doxy groups, respectively (p = 0.010). The number of documented bacteremic episodes was 13 (11%) and 14 (4.7%) in the two groups, respectively (p = 0.017). Antimicrobial resistance and Clostridium difficile infections were uncommon. Transplant-related mortality was 1% in both groups.Conclusions: The addition of doxycycline to standard prophylaxis with ciprofloxacin seems to reduce the number of NF episodes and documented bacterial infections in patients with MM undergoing ASCT, without increasing rate of serious complications. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: High-dose melphalan and autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) are associated with high symptom burden. This study aimed to explore multiple myeloma (MM) patients' experience of symptom frequency, intensity, and distress during therapy.Methods: This descriptive longitudinal study enrolled 29 MM patients who completed the 43-item PROVIVO questionnaire, measuring symptom experience across the dimensions of frequency, intensity, and distress at four assessment points: hospital admission (T0), leucocyte nadir (T1), discharge (T2), and 30 days post discharge (T3). Symptom assessment covered five categories: (1) physical, (2) emotional, (3) cognitive, (4) male/female urogenital symptoms, and (5) follow-up care planning (e.g., financial problems). Results were displayed as heat maps and bubble graphs for each patient, differences between T0 and T4 individually assessed, and intensity (IMS) and mean distress scores (DMS) calculated on a scale from 0 to 4.Results: The most frequent, intense, and distressing physical symptoms were fatigue, diarrhea, and decreased appetite. As expected, peak symptom intensity (decreased appetite 2.79) and distress (diarrhea 2.11) were reported during high-dose melphalan and the leucocyte nadir (T1). Thereafter, most symptoms' intensity and distress improved. Items on urogenital symptoms remained predominantly unanswered or patients were sexually inactive.Conclusions: PROVIVO enabled exploration of various dimensions of MM patients' symptom experiences, which differed substantially before and after ASCT. Our results suggest that high-dose melphalan, ASCT, and other intensive novel agent therapies warrant targeted symptom management programs that include focused patient support. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Standard conditioning regimens for autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) are often not tolerated by elderly patients, on one hand. Single high-dose melphalan, on the other hand, has been shown to be safe and active as a pretransplant preparative regimen in elderly patients. Y90 -Ibritumomab tiuxetan (Y90 -IT) is well tolerated and feasible in the transplantation setting. We therefore investigated the combination of high-dose melphalan and Y90 -IT as a conditioning regimen for patients ≥65 years of age. Patients with relapsed or resistant CD20-positive lymphoma in remission after salvage chemotherapy could be enrolled. High-dose therapy consisted of standard dose Y90 -IT (0.4-mCi/kg body weight) followed by melphalan at escalating doses (100, 140, 170 and 200 mg/m2 ) and ASCT. The primary objective was to identify the maximum tolerated dose; secondary end points were complete response (CR) rate 100 days after transplantation and toxicity. Twenty patients (median age 72 years) were included. No DLT occurred at any dose level. Thirteen patients completed the treatment, 11 were evaluable for response. Seven patients did not complete treatment because of mobilization failure (n = 3), progressive disease (n = 2), worsening of cardiac function (n = 1), and grade 3 dyspnea (n = 1). Seven patients achieved a CR/complete remission/unconfirmed (CRu) and 2 had stable disease. Five out of 7 responding patients were still alive more than 3 years after transplantation. The 2 patients with SD had a long-term survival of 3 and 5 years, respectively. Nonhematological grade 3 or higher treatment related adverse events (AEs) were infection (n = 6), including 2 cases of febrile neutropenia, diarrhea (n = 3), mucositis, anorexia, viral hepatitis, hypokalemia, dehydration, and multiorgan failure (n = 1 for each). The combination of Y90 -IT and high-dose melphalan is feasible before ASCT for elderly patients, with promising activity and manageable toxicity. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) is a significant side effect in multiple myeloma (MM) patients receiving high-dose melphalan treatment followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). We evaluated the efficacy and safety of a triple antiemetic combination of palonosetron, aprepitant, and low-dose dexamethasone in 24 MM patients who received melphalan conditioning (100 mg/m2 on days 1-2) before ASCT (on day 4). Intravenous palonosetron (0.75 mg on day 1), oral aprepitant (125 mg on day 1; 80 mg on days 2-4), and intravenous dexamethasone (6.6 mg on days 1-4) were administered for prevention of CINV. Complete response (no emesis and no rescue antiemetic) and complete control (no emesis, no rescue antiemetic, and no more than mild nausea) rates were 75 and 68% during the overall phase (0-120 h), while they were 88 and 86% in the acute phase (0-48 h), 75 and 68% in the delayed phase (48-120 h), and 67 and 59% in the extended phase (120-168 h), respectively. There were no serious adverse events related to the antiemetic therapy. In conclusion, the three-antiemetic regimen consisting of palonosetron, aprepitant, and dexamethasone was safe and effective for controlling CINV due to high-dose melphalan treatment, especially during the delayed phase. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Bortezomib-dexamethasone (BD) and high-dose melphalan (HDM) are effective for systemic light-chain (AL) amyloidosis, but have not been compared in detail. We retrospectively investigated patients treated with BD or HDM at our center between September 2001 and June 2016. Among 234 patients, 20 were treated with BD and 30 received HDM. With the exception of age, transplant eligibility, and previous history of other chemotherapy, there were no significant differences in most background parameters between the two groups. Median age was higher (63.2 vs. 55.8, P = 0.001), number of transplant-eligible patients was lower (60.0 vs. 96.7%, P = 0.002), and number of previously treated patients was higher (35.0 vs. 0.0%, P < 0.001) in the BD group. The BD group showed trends toward lower treatment-related mortality (5.0 vs. 10.0%, P = 0.641), greater hematological response (partial response or better) (90.0 vs. 73.3%, P = 0.279), higher complete response (60 vs. 50%, P = 0.487), and similar survival with the HDM group (neither reached, P = 0.705). In conclusion, BD was as effective and safe as HDM. Notably, BD achieved this outcome among patients with poorer clinical backgrounds compared with HDM. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

High-dose melphalan (MEL) is the standard therapy for autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) in multiple myeloma (MM), although the optimal conditioning regimen remains yet to be identified. Thiotepa (THIO) appears to be a potentially effective option, with broad-spectrum antitumor efficacy that can be added to myeloablative multiagent regimens for ASCT in hematopoietic tumors. We conducted a phase II trial, adding THIO (275 mg/m 2 ) to high-dose MEL (140 mg/m 2 ) before a second ASCT, in a tandem ASCT strategy, in 64 patients with “de novo” MM. Overall, there was no transplant-related mortality. The incidence of neutropenic fever and mucositis (grades 3 to 4) was 39% and 9%, respectively. Median number of days to neutrophil and platelet engraftment were 11 and 12, respectively. After the second transplantation, the complete response improved to 43.8%. Overall response rate was 86%. After a median follow-up of 18.1 months, 13 patients had progressed and 3 died from MM. Median progression-free survival was not reached, and actuarial 2-year rates of progression-free and overall survival were 71% and 88.9%, respectively. Our results suggest that THIO/MEL is a feasible and safe conditioning regimen for ASCT in MM and should be explored for efficacy in a phase III study. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Oral mucositis ( OM) is a common complication of conditioning regimens with high-dose melphalan ( HDmel). This retrospective cohort study analyzes the impact of oral cryotherapy ( OC) or room temperature saline rinses on the prevention of OM in patients with multiple myeloma ( MM) or lymphoid neoplasias submitted to autologous stem cell transplantation ( ASCT) in a single center. Patients and methods From August 2006 to July 2011, 134 consecutive patients were enrolled. Two consecutive groups were included: Non- OC (August 2006 to April 2009, 68 patients) and OC (May 2009 to July 2011, 66 cases). MM cases (78, 58%) received HDmel as the conditioning regimen and 56 patients (42%) with lymphoma received BEAM. Results The non- OC and OC groups were comparable for the main clinicobiologic features and type of neoplasia. OM was more frequent and severe in patients receiving BEAM as the conditioning therapy. The group of OC showed less frequent and less severe mucositis and fewer days on antibiotics. No differences were observed in the duration of OM, need for parenteral nutrition and narcotics, and the length of hospital stay on comparison with the OC and non- OC groups. By multivariate analyses, OC was an independent favorable prognostic factor for OM development. Conclusions This study shows that OC is more effective than saline rinses in the prevention of OM in patients with lymphoma and myeloma receiving conditioning regimens with HDmel for ASCT. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: Multiple myeloma is the most frequent indication for high-dose melphalan (HDM) chemotherapy with autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). Gastrointestinal symptoms represent the most significant nonhematological toxicity of HDM. However, specific, especially genetic, predictors of their incidence or clinical severity are lacking. The amino acid transporters LAT1 and LAT2 encoded by the SLC7A5 and SLC7A8 genes, respectively, are the principal mediators of melphalan uptake into cells. To determine whether genetic variability at these loci contributed to interindividual differences in the development of gastrointestinal complications of HDM, we analyzed single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in these genes in 135 patients with multiple myeloma treated with HDM and ASCT and correlated these with the need for total parenteral nutrition (TPN). Seven SNPs in SLC7A5 and 20 in SLC7A8 were genotyped. Multiple analyses indicated that 1 SNP in the first intron of SLC7A5, rs4240803, was significantly associated with TPN use (odds ratio = .45, 95% confidence interval, .25 to .79; P = .007). Further, every haplotype that correlated with TPN requirement included this SNP. These results suggest that variability in melphalan transport affects mucosal injury after HDM. This finding could help in individualizing the dose of this effective and widely used chemotherapeutic agent for multiple myeloma. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Background In the 1960s, it was reported that infectious complications were the main cause of fever during neutropenia that followed hematopoietic stem cell transplant ( HSCT). More recently, mucositis has become recognized as an important determinant of the inflammatory response and infectious complications. Methods The objective of this prospective study was to determine the impact of intestinal mucositis, as measured by plasma citrulline, and neutropenia on the systemic inflammatory response (C-reactive protein) and the occurrence of bacteremia among 2 cohorts of HSCT recipients: 1 composed of 18 patients who had been treated with a myeloablative ( MA) regimen (high-dose melphalan) and the other involving 19 patients who had received the non-myeloablative ( NMA) regimen (fludarabine and cyclophosphamide). Blood cultures were obtained for surveillance from admission onwards as well as at the onset of fever. Results The MA regimen induced severe intestinal mucositis manifest by citrullinemia <10 μmol/L, which was accompanied by an inflammatory response, and bacteremia affected 8 (44%) of 18 patients and coincided with the nadir of citrullinemia. By contrast, those who had been treated with the NMA regimen did not develop severe intestinal mucositis, had a moderate inflammatory response, and only 2 (11%) of the 19 patients developed bacteremia. However, both groups experienced profound neutropenia and its duration was significantly longer for those receiving the NMA regimen. Conclusion This study suggests that severe intestinal mucositis, i.e., citrullinemia <10 μmol/L, defines the period of risk of bacteremia better than does neutropenia, and that measuring plasma citrulline may prove useful in deciding who needs empirical antimicrobial therapy and when. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

High-dose melphalan has been gaining recognition as a highly emetogenic agent used in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). The aim of this retrospective study was to elucidate the efficacy of aprepitant in preventing high-dose melphalan-induced emesis. Sixty patients who received melphalan (70 mg/m/day, 2 days) and fludarabine (125 mg/m/day, 5 days) as conditioning for allogeneic HSCT for hematological malignancies, and who received ondansetron and methylprednisolone as an antiemetic prophylaxis, were eligible. Twenty of these 60 patients also received aprepitant for 5 days (aprepitant group); the remaining 40 patients served as a control. The rates of complete response (CR), defined as no emesis without rescue medications, and complete protection (CP), defined as no emesis with or without rescue medications, were assessed between the two groups. The observation period was 12 days from the first day of melphalan administration. The CR and CP rates were significantly higher in the aprepitant group than in the control group during the observation period (35 % versus 10 %, P < 0.05; 85 % versus 33 %, P < 0.001; respectively). These results suggest that aprepitant in combination with ondansetron and steroid effectively ameliorates nausea and vomiting caused by the high-dose melphalan-based conditioning for allogeneic HSCT. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Autologous stem-cell transplant has been widely used to treat patients with AL amyloidosis. However, transplant-related mortality rates are high, and a recent randomized trial suggested that non-transplant regimens produced comparable results with less toxicity. In order to define the role of patient selection in stem cell transplantation, we evaluated 78 consecutive AL amyloidosis patients transplanted at our centre. Transplant-related mortality occurred in 11·5%. Complete haematological response and organ response were achieved in 56% and 60%. Median overall survival was significantly lower for patients with brain-type natriuretic peptide ( BNP) >300 pg/ml (17·5 months vs. not-reached) ( P = 0·0004), troponin-I >0·07 ng/ml (13·5 months vs. not-reached) ( P = 0·00001) and those not achieving a complete haematological response (88 months vs. not-reached) ( P = 0·0345); high BNP and troponin-I were the most important predictive factors in a multivariate analysis. Based on this study, patients with BNP <300 pg/ml and/or normal levels of troponin-I should be considered transplant candidates. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Der Onkologe is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Abstract: Melphalan 200 mg/m2 is the standard conditioning regimen for patients with multiple myeloma (MM) with normal renal function (NRF) undergoing autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT). In an effort to escalate the dose of melphalan and to improve the efficacy, we designed a dose-escalation study of melphalan in conjunction with palifermin in patients with NRF, with the hope that a higher dose of melphalan can be administered with an acceptable degree of oral mucositis (OM). We enrolled 19 patients (18 evaluable) with NRF. Dose-escalation of melphalan administered on day −2 began at 200 mg/m2 with palifermin administered at a fixed dose of 60 mcg/kg/day. Palifermin was given as an i.v. bolus on day −5, −4, and −3, and then on day +1, +2, and +3. Subsequent dose escalations of melphalan were done at 20 mg/m2 increments up to a maximum dose of 280 mg/m2. Of 18 evaluable patients, there were no treatment-related deaths by day 100. The median age was 48.5 years (range, 33-65 years). The most common adverse events related to palifermin included rash (18 events, no ≥grade 3 events), elevation of amylase (10 events, 4 were grade 3 but asymptomatic), and lipase (5 events, 2 were grade 3 but asymptomatic), edema (11 events, no ≥grade 3). The overall incidence of OM grade 3 was 44% (8/18) with a median duration of severe mucositis of 5 days (range, 3-6 days). Eleven patients (61%) required opioid analgesics. None of the patients received total parenteral nutrition (TPN)/nasogastric feeding. Two of 6 patients who were given melphalan 280 mg/m2 did not develop OM. Cardiac dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) in the form of atrial fibrillation did occur in 1 of 6 patients treated with melphalan 280 mg/m2. Palifermin has permitted safe dose escalation of melphalan up to 280 mg/m2, thus reaching the cumulative dosage of melphalan administered in tandem ASCT. This higher dose of melphalan has the potential to improve the efficacy and, hopefully, outcomes of patients with MM with a single ASCT. A phase 2 trial is necessary to better delineate the antimyeloma efficacy of this regimen. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

High-dose melphalan 140 mg/m2 is the standard of care for patients with multiple myeloma (MM) with renal insufficiency (RI). Palifermin as a cytoprotective agent has demonstrated efficacy in reducing the intensity and duration of oral mucositis (OM) in patients who receive intensive chemotherapy/radiotherapy. There is no prospective data on the use of palifermin in patients with MM with RI. Eligibility criteria: creatinine clearance ≤60 mL/minute/1.73 m2, age >18 years, no dialysis, no active OM, and a suitable candidate for autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT). Melphalan dose ranged from 140 to 200 mg/m2 and escalated at the increment of 20 mg/m2. Six dosages of palifermin 60 mcg/kg/day were given intravenously between day –5 to day +3. Dose escalations were to stop if dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) occurred at melphalan dose in ≥2 of 3 patients, with that dose declared as the maximal administered dose and the level below where ≤1 of 6 patients had DLTs was considered the maximally tolerated dose (MTD). Nineteen patients were enrolled from June 2007 to June 2011. Data on 15 evaluable patients is reported as 4 patients were removed. Median age was 59 years (range, 36-67 years). The overall incidence of OM ≥ grade 3 was 53% (8 of 15) and a median duration of ≥grade 3 OM was 6.5 days (range, 3-42 days). One patient in L2 (melphalan 160 mg/m2) developed atrial fibrillation on day +9. Two patients in L4 (melphalan 200 mg/m2) developed grade 4 OM, hence reaching DLT. No DLT was observed in 6 patients enrolled in L3 (melphalan 180 mg/m2). Palifermin has permitted safe dose escalation of melphalan up to 180 mg/m2 in patients with RI. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Cardiac complications following hematopoietic stem cell transplantation ( HSCT) are emerging as a significant concern given the increasing utilization of HSCT for a variety of hematologic malignancies. Methods We utilized an existing database to determine the frequency of cardiac dysfunction ( CD), namely a decrease in left ventricular ejection fraction, following conditioning with high-dose melphalan ( HDM) and autologous HSCT for multiple myeloma ( MM) and systemic amyloidosis ( AL). We then performed a case-control study to examine variables associated with increased risk of CD in this population. Results In MM patients undergoing HSCT, the rate of CD was 1.6% (17/1050, 95% CI: [0.9, 2.6]). None of the examined pre- HSCT variables or HDM dose were significantly associated with development of CD in this population. In patients with AL, the rate of CD was 5.6% (24/426, 95% CI: [3.6, 8.3]). On univariate analysis, decision to administer an HDM dose <200 mg/m2 [odds ratio ( OR): 4.59 (1.27-16.57) P = 0.02], pretransplant left ventricular ejection fraction <60% [ OR: 17.78 (2.29-138.33) P = 0.006], and documented amyloid involvement of ≥3 organs [ OR: 4.0 (1.03-15.6) P = 0.046] were associated with the development of CD in the AL population. No other examined peri-transplant factors were associated with development of CD. Conclusion To our knowledge, this is the first series to report a significant rate of CD following HDM conditioning and autologous HSCT in patients with AL. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

High-dose melphalan and auto-SCT (HDM/SCT) induces hematological complete responses (HCRs) in 40% of patients with immunoglobulin light chain (AL) amyloidosis. However, relapses occur in 8% of patients who initially achieve HCR. We conducted a study to explore the feasibility and efficacy of a second HDM/SCT in this setting. Eleven patients were enrolled. Five patients underwent repeat stem cell mobilization with G-CSF; the others had stem cells cryopreserved from the first mobilization. Six patients received 200 mg/m2 HDM; five patients received modified HDM at 140 mg/m2. Engraftment occurred at a median of 10 days for neutrophils and 12 days for platelets. There was no treatment-related mortality or death within the first year, but significant grade III/IV non-hematological toxicities occurred. In all, 4 of 11 patients (36%) achieved HCR at 1 year. Two of these patients are in continuous remission at 3 and 6 years; the other two relapsed at 2 and 3 years. Of the four patients who achieved partial hematological response at 1 year, three have relapsed at a median of 3 years. Three patients died of progressive disease at 1-2 years. In conclusion, one-third of patients with AL amyloidosis who relapse after HDM/SCT can achieve HCR with a second SCT. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The current standard conditioning regimen before auto-SCT in patients with multiple myeloma is melphalan 200 mg/m2. Several attempts have recently been made to improve this aspect of the high-dose therapy procedure. The scope of this review article is to summarize current knowledge on conditioning regimens in this setting. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We report a patient with primary systemic AL amyloidosis who suffered from remarkable bilateral cervical lymphadenopathy. Intensive chemotherapies, including two cycles of high-dose melphalan with autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation, were insufficiently effective for both the lymphadenopathy and amyloidogenic IgGλλ-type M-protein in serum, but the patient showed complete haematological remission after extensive surgical removal of enlarged lymph nodes that had massive depositions of λλ-type immunoglobulin light chain-derived amyloid. Lymphadenectomy may be a possible therapeutic approach with regard to both cosmetic and haematological aspects in primary systemic AL amyloidosis patients with focal lymphadenopathy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Explore safety and efficacy of three palonosetron-containing regimens for emesis prevention over 7 days in multiple myeloma (MM) patients receiving melphalan (100 mg/m2) and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT).Patients and methods: Randomized, double-blind pilot study in MM patients (n = 73) receiving 1, 2, or 3 days of 0.25 mg palonosetron (30-s i.v. bolus) 30 min before melphalan (days −2 and −1) and HSCT (day 0). Patients received dexamethasone (20 mg i.v., days −2 and −1) immediately before or after study drug/placebo. Daily diaries recorded emesis, rescue medication, nausea duration, and adverse events (AEs).Results: Seven-day complete protection (no emesis) occurred in 41.7% [95% confidence interval (CI) 22.1% to 63.4%], 41.7% (95% CI 22.1% to 63.4%), and 44.0% (95% CI 24.2% to 65.1%) of patients receiving 1, 2, or 3 days of palonosetron, respectively (P = 0.43). Complete response (emesis free without rescue medication) occurred in 8.3%, 20.8%, and 20.0% (P = 0.14). Common AEs (≥10%) were mild-to-moderate diarrhea, constipation, headache, insomnia, and flatulence. No serious AEs occurred.Conclusions: Palonosetron with dexamethasone was safe and effective in preventing emesis in MM patients receiving melphalan and HSCT. This pilot study with a limited number of patients suggests that multiple doses of palonosetron could be more effective than a single dose in making patients emesis free without need for rescue medication. However, even multiple doses of palonosetron resulted in only 20% of patients being emesis free without rescue medication, suggesting that further improvement will require development of more effective combination antiemetic therapy. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]

45-year-old Japanese woman had been diagnosed with monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) featuring urinary Bence-Jones protein of the lambda type (BJP-lambda) for 11 years. She then developed eyelid purpura, dyspnea, and flank pain. Abdominal CT scans revealed renal infarction. Biopsy of the kidney, heart, jejunum, and skin demonstrated amyloid deposits in the vessel walls, but not in the glomeruli. She was diagnosed as having AL amyloidosis with IgD-lambda monoclonal gammopathy and BJP-lambda. Autologous stem cell transplantation (SCT) was done after chemotherapy with vincristine, daunorubicin, dexamethasone (VAD), and high-dose melphalan (HDM). This reduced the IgD level from 156 to 0.1 mg/dL, along with the disappearance of BJP, despite cerebral infarction during chemotherapy. We recommend SCT for patients with IgD-associated AL amyloidosis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We report a 58-year-old Japanese man with primary systemic AL amyloidosis who achieved disappearance of proteinuria including Bence-Jones protein (λ-type) after two courses of VAD therapy (vincristine, doxorubicin, and dexamethasone) and subsequent high-dose melphalan, followed by autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation. Because this patient did not have any apparent amyloidosis-related heart or liver damage and met all of the eligibility criteria for this therapy, this treatment was performed. Both proteinuria and M-protein disappeared completely, and he is doing well clinically at 19 months after treatment. However, amyloid deposits were still found in the kidneys, including the glomeruli and tubulointerstitium, when renal biopsy was done at 8 months after treatment. In the future, we may reach a time when clinical remission corresponds to histological remission. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We analyzed the results of 108 patients (78 males and 30 females) with multiple myeloma who underwent autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). The median age of patients was 52 years (range, 26–68 years). High-dose melphalan (200 mg/m2) was used for conditioning. In all, 66 (61%) patients had evidence of chemo-sensitive disease before transplant. After ASCT 79.6% of patients responded: complete response 36%, very good partial response 29.6%, and partial response 13.9%. Complete response rate was higher for patients with chemo-sensitive disease; 33 of 66 (50.0%) patients achieved complete response compared with 7 of 42 (14.3%) patients with progressive disease, P<0.01. Response rates to ASCT were significantly low for patients with Hb 8.5 g/dl, serum albumin 3.3 g/dl, β-2 microglobulin >5.5 mg/l, International Staging System stage III at diagnosis and >12 months interval from diagnosis to transplant. Grade III–IV mucositis was the major regimen-related toxicity. At a median follow-up of 70 months, the median overall survival and event free survival (EFS) were 71 and 42 months, respectively. Estimated overall survival and EFS at 60 months were 54.4±0.05% (s.e.) and 49.3±0.05% (s.e.), respectively. Survival was significantly better for patients with pre-transplant chemo-sensitive disease and for those who achieved complete response following transplant.Bone Marrow Transplantation (2009) 43, 481–489; doi:10.1038/bmt.2008.343; published online 3 November 2008 [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The role of high-dose chemotherapy (HDCT) in epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) remains controversial. This study was initiated to compare the efficacy and tolerability of HDCT as a consolidation approach in women with chemosensitive advanced EOC (FIGO stages IIC–IV). Patients who had achieved their first clinical complete remission after six cycles of conventional paclitaxel and carboplatin combination chemotherapy were randomly assigned to receive or not high-dose melphalan. The primary objective was to compare time to disease progression (TTP). A total of 80 patients were enrolled onto the trial. Patients who were randomized to receive HDCT were initially treated with cyclophosphamide 4 g/m2 for PBPC mobilization. HDCT consisted of melphalan 200 mg/m2. Of the 37 patients who were allocated to HDCT, 11 (29.7%) did not receive melphalan either due to patient refusal (n=5) or due to failure of PBPC mobilization (n=6). In an intent-to-treat analysis, there were no significant differences between the two arms in TTP (P=0.059) as well as in overall survival (OS) (P=0.38).Bone Marrow Transplantation (2008) 41, 547–554; doi:10.1038/sj.bmt.1705925; published online 19 November 2007 [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Primary (AL amyloidosis) is a systemic disease characterized by an amyloid deposition process in many organs, with unsatisfactory survival of patients. The monoclonal light chains form the fibrils that deposit and accumulate in tissues. Renal involvement is very frequent in AL amyloidosis and could lead to development of nephrotic syndrome followed by the renal failure in many cases. Classic therapeutic combination melphalan and prednisone has been supplemented with drugs with different mechanisms of action in this group of patients: high-dose dexamethasone, high-dose dexamethasone with melphalan, combination of vincristine, doxorubicin, and dexamethasone or newly high-dose melphalan supported by peripheral blood stem cell transplantation. This progressive therapy leads to the better survival and prognosis in the majority of patients. Alternative therapeutic approaches include thalidomide (alone or in combination with cyclophosphamide), lenalidomide, iododoxorubicin, etanercept and rituximab. The development of immunotherapy is expected in the near future. Copyright © 2007 S. Karger AG, Basel [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Total Therapy 1, the first tandem autotransplant trial for newly diagnosed patients with multiple myeloma, was designed to increase the frequency of complete response (CR) and thereby extend survival. With a median follow-up of 12 years, 62 of 231 initially enrolled patients are alive (17% at 15 years); 31 remain event free (7% at 15 years) including 16 of 94 (41%) that initially achieved CR. Currently alive patients less frequently had cytogenetic abnormalities (CAs) at baseline ( P = 0·002), postenrolment ( P < 0·001) and at relapse ( P = 0·004); elevations of serum C-reactive protein (CRP) ( P = 0·003) and lactate dehydrogenase ( P = 0·029), anaemia ( P = 0·029) and they more often completed two transplants within 12 months ( P = 0·019). Postenrolment overall survival (OS) and event-free survival (EFS) were superior in the absence of CA of the hypodiploidy or deletion 13 variety ( P < 0·001 and 0·037 respectively) and in the presence of low CRP at baseline ( P = 0·001 and 0·017 respectively). Postrelapse survival was longer in the absence of CA at relapse ( P < 0·001), IgA isotype ( P = 0·002), International Staging System stage 3 ( P = 0·014), and when patients had two protocol transplants prior to relapse ( P = 0·038). Ten-year EFS and OS could be accomplished in 15% and 33% of patients, respectively, when all agents available in 1989, especially high-dose melphalan, were applied together upfront for the management of myeloma. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In a pilot study high-dose melphalan (HD-Mel, 200 mg/m2) and autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) were administered to 14 patients (median age 52, range 29–60 years) with acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) in first relapse after a previous ASCT in first complete remission ( n=11) or chemotherapy ( n=3). A first cohort of five patients received HD-Mel as salvage therapy after a previous cycle of mitoxantrone, topotecan and cytarabine (MTC) had failed in four out of five patients, while a second cohort of nine patients received HD-Mel in untreated relapse. Thirteen (93%) of 14 patients achieved a second complete remission (CR2), including all four patients who had been refractory to MTC. No treatment-related mortality was observed after HD-Mel. Thirteen (93%) patients were able to proceed to a dose-reduced allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) from human-leucocyte-antigens-compatible unrelated ( n=12) or sibling donors ( n=1) in CR2 ( n=11) or poor recovery/relapse ( n=2) after a median of 2 (1.7–4.5) months following HD-Mel. Three MTC-refractory patients, but none of the upfront HD-Mel patients, died due to an allograft-related non-relapse cause. Nine patients are alive in CR2 after a median of 6 (2–49) months after HD-Mel and a median of 4 (0.6–47) months after a sequential allo-SCT. Although median follow-up is still short, the proportion of patients achieving a CR2, as well as of those proceeding to a subsequent reduced-intensity-conditioning-allo-SCT, is superior to those previously reported. Our results highly encourage to further investigate HD-Mel and ASCT as a promising salvage regimen for relapsed AML patients for whom autologous peripheral blood stem cells are available. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Patients with AL amyloidosis were treated with VAD (vincristine, doxorubicin and dexamethasone) with or without high-dose melphalan followed by auto-PBSCT according to eligibility criteria based on disease severity, and prospectively investigated the therapeutic benefits and complications. Thirty-one patients were enrolled in this study. VAD and subsequent high-dose melphalan with auto-PBSCT were performed only in patients who met all of the eligibility criteria. Among patients ineligible for this treatment, VAD alone was performed in those with satisfactory general status. Eleven patients met the eligibility criteria, and of these, 7 were treated with VAD and subsequent high-dose melphalan with auto-PBSCT. Seven patients received VAD alone, and the remaining 17 were treated with the supportive therapy. Among the 14 patients treated with chemotherapy, 9 (5 of the 7 treated with VAD and high-dose melphalan, and 4 of the 7 treated with VAD alone) showed complete hematological response with apparent improvement of amyloidosis-related clinical symptoms. Serious complications of chemotherapy were cytomegalovirus infection and pneumocystis carinii pneumonia seen in 1 and 2 patients, respectively. These chemotherapies may be effective for reduction of M-protein and are also useful in improving of amyloidosis-induced organ dysfunction. In patients who cannot tolerate high-dose melphalan, VAD alone is a potent therapeutic option, although there are possible harmful effects on the heart and peripheral nerve. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Amyloid light chain (AL) amyloidosis is the result of a clonal plasma cell expansion, in which monoclonal light chains transform to amyloid deposit in various tissues and can lead to organ dysfunction and organ failure. The median survival of patients with AL amyloidosis without therapy is 10–14 months. With high-dose melphalan (HDM) and autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT), haematological and clinical remission rates of up to 50% of treated patients have been reported from phase II studies. HDM followed by ASCT appears to prolong survival in patients, if haematological remission can be reached. In this phase II study, we evaluated vincristine, adriamycin and dexamethasone (VAD) as induction chemotherapy prior to stem cell mobilization and HDM with ASCT. The regimen was, in general, feasible in patients with AL amyloidosis, but VAD chemotherapy had a considerable World Health Organization (WHO) grade III–IV toxicity (25%) and mortality (7%) rate. VAD pretreatment did not interfere with stem cell mobilization and HDM with ASCT was possible in 86% of patients. The overall treatment efficacy was comparable with reported results of HDM and ASCT without preceding chemotherapy. We could not show an additional benefit of VAD induction in terms of increasing haematological response rate; however the 13% mortality rate after HDM and ASCT in our series was lower than the previous report. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

A total of 65 adults with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) received 200 mg/m2 melphalan and an autograft in first remission, with a plan to receive 6-mercaptopurine (6MP), methotrexate (MTX), and vincristine—prednisone (VP) for 2 years afterwards. There was no transplant-related mortality. In all, 69% of patients received 6MP, 54% received MTX, and 49% received VP. The cumulative incidence of relapse at 5 years was 52%. The 5-year probabilities of disease-free (DFS) and overall (OS) survival were 48 and 55%. Age >30 years, >4 weeks to attain remission, and t(9;22) or t(4;11) karyotypes were adverse prognostic features. Patients with 0 (standard risk), 1 (intermediate risk), and 2–3 (high risk) adverse features had 5-year cumulative incidences of relapse of 19, 59, and 100% (P<0.0001), and 5-year probabilities of DFS of 80, 41, and 0% (P<0.0001). The 5-year probabilities of DFS for patients receiving 0, 1, 2, and 3 maintenance therapy agents were 19, 40, 51, and 70% (P = 0.0097). Maintenance therapy intensity was an independent determinant of outcome in Cox analysis. These data show that a high-dose melphalan-based autograft is safe and could be widely applicable in ALL in first remission, and that maintenance chemotherapy very likely contributes to improved outcome of auto-grafted ALL patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]